PLATE VII.--SIR RICHARD SOUTHWELL

(In the Uffizi Gallery, Florence)

This striking portrait of one of Holbein's contemporaries is

one of the best examples of the master's work in Italy. A study

for the finished picture may be seen at Windsor, and there is

another copy in the Louvre. It was Sir Richard Southwell who

did much to bring about the fall of Sir Thomas More.

[Illustration]

When in 1531 the painter returned to England he could stand alone, and

this was well for him, since Sir Thomas More was born to learn that

the favour of princes is not remarkable for a quality of permanence.

There would seem to have been no lack of work for Holbein as long as he

lived. Here we may remark that the date of his death is in dispute,

some authorities placing it as early as 1543, while others grant him

another eleven years--a very valuable concession to any poor mortal,

but one that the Fates do not appear to have granted, 1543 being the

probable date of his death, and the Plague the cause.

He was not satisfied with portraits for long. The Steelyard, of which

we shall soon speak at length, gave him subject pictures to paint.

King Henry took him into his service with a retainer of £30 a year,

no inconsiderable sum in those days, and payment for all works done,

and he soon became a painter of the pictures that are produced to

commemorate state occasions. Happily he painted them better than some

more modern men have been able to. It is hardly a reproach to a man

that he cannot invest with special interest a picture that is to all

intent and purpose composed for him, a canvas on which the figures must

be handled less with regard to composition than precedence, and really

Holbein did very well. His education was certain to tell in his favour;

he began to enjoy the fruits of his association with the Humanists. Great

painters employed at European Courts enjoyed a certain ambassadorial

rank: the interest taken in art was so considerable, that the gift of

a picture by a great artist was as fine a present as could be given

or received, and when artists were sent to foreign courts they were

often entrusted with missions not associated directly or indirectly with

their profession.

To be sure, Holbein did not hold the same high position that fell to

Peter Paul Rubens, but he was entrusted on two occasions with missions

of a very delicate character, being instructed to paint the portraits

of ladies whom the king had married or was prepared to marry. The

Dowager Duchess of Milan was one of the few who declined to become

Queen of England, and Anne of Cleves was one who was less discriminating.

There can be no doubt that Holbein's capacity for expressing strength

in the most delicate fashion imaginable appealed very strongly to his

sitters. The rugged character of one man's head, the delicate lines of

a woman's face, could be expressed without violence in the one case or

excess of sentiment in the other, and he does not seem to have done more

than present his sitters in their most attractive aspect, and with due

regard to their salient characteristics. He did not flatter and he did

not shock, but would seem to have found something at once pleasant and

true to express about all his sitters.

Although it does not seem unreasonable to believe that Holbein would

have lacked work on his return to England, even if the social troubles

of the time had been even greater than they were, it must be admitted

that the painter was very fortunate in securing the patronage of the

Steelyard, the great German or Anglo-German trading company established

on the banks of the Thames. It was associated with the Hanseatic

League; its buildings extended over a large part of the city in the

neighbourhood of Thames Street and Cannon Street; its members had a

Guildhall with beautiful garden in a place where London is almost at

its ugliest to-day, and the Steelyard Tavern was a very noted house. To

the Steelyard came all the traffic of the Orient, all the spices of the

merchant. As much of Europe as had the desire to trade with England--then

only a second-rate power--relied largely upon the agency of the Steelyard.

The Corporation that governed the undertaking would seem to have been a

very capable body, and in return for the privileges granted to it by

successive rulers, every member was sworn to play a man's part in the

defence of London. We have nothing like the Steelyard in Great Britain

to-day, but the East India Company probably had much in common with it;

and had Rhodesia proved worthy of the highest hopes entertained by its

founder, the Chartered Company might have been conducted on similar

lines. Such associations are apt to spring up when an old country

discovers a new one. German trading associations were as pushful in

Renaissance times as they are to-day, and more artistic. It should

be remembered that Bellini, Titian, and Tintoretto worked for German

merchants in Venice.

When Holbein came back to London to find Warham and Colet dead, and Sir

Thomas More, with but a little space of life left, retiring from the

high office of Chancellor, he seems to have found new friends in the

Steelyard; and perhaps because he was anxious to establish a position

among the members of the richest trading guild of his time, he seems to

have devoted a great deal of care and time to his world-famous portrait

of George Gisze, one of the merchants of the Steelyard. The picture,

in an admirable condition of preservation, is to be seen in the Berlin

Gallery, and is one of the richest, most decorative portraits ever

painted by the artist. It will be found reproduced in these pages, and

perhaps there will be some who will wonder whether the artist did not

work deliberately to interest and astonish his new clients, and whether,

for that purpose, he did not depart from his usual reticence and good

taste. The portrait of Gisze himself, a handsome man, wearing a bright

scarlet doublet under a black cloak, is admirable, it arrests and holds

the attention. But the heterogeneous mass of accessories startles and

tires the spectator. Vase and flowers, scissors, book, scales, letters,

golden balls, inscription, keys, watches, seals--there seems to be no

limit to the material with which Holbein has loaded his canvas, and the

accessories are all so well painted that they seem to be wasted. There

is no reason to doubt that Holbein was deliberately painting a picture

for purpose of advertisement, and that he intended to make his appeal

to a class that, for all its business acumen and commercial intelligence,

was not on the same intellectual plane as the men of Sir Thomas More's

world.

Holbein(#43410) · 第 20 / 24 题