C = (A10^{6}) / (nV).

A series of experiments made on this plan have revealed the fact that

if a number of vertical insulated wires are hung up in the air and

rather near together, the electrical capacity of the whole of the

wires in parallel is not nearly equal to the sum of their individual

capacities. If a number of parallel insulated wires are separated by a

distance equal to about 3 per cent. of their length, the capacity of

the whole lot together varies roughly as the square root of their

number. Thus, if we call the capacity of one vertical wire in free

space unity, then the capacity of four wires placed rather near

together will only be about twice that of one wire, and that of

twenty-five wires will only be about five times one wire.

This approximate rule has been confirmed by experiments made with long

wires one hundred or two hundred feet in length in the open air. Hence

it points to the fact that the ordinary plan of endeavouring to obtain

a large capacity by putting several wires in parallel and not very far

apart is very uneconomical in material. The diagrams in Fig. 8 show

the various methods which have been employed by Mr. Marconi and others

in the construction of such multiple wire aerials. If, for instance,

we put four insulated stranded 7/22 wires each 100 feet long, about

six feet apart, all being held in a vertical position, the capacity of

the four together is not much more than twice that of a single wire.

In the same manner, if we arrange 150 similar wires, each 100 feet

long, in the form of a conical aerial, the wires being distributed at

the top round a circle 100 feet in diameter, the whole group will not

have much more than twelve times the capacity of one single wire,

although it weighs 150 times as much.

[Illustration: FIG. 8.--VARIOUS FORMS OF AERIAL RADIATOR. _a_, single

wire; _b_, multiple wire; _c_, fan shape; _d_, cylindrical; _g_,

Conical.]

The author has designed an aerial in which the wires, all of equal

length, are arranged sufficiently far apart not to reduce each other's

capacity.

As a rough guide in practice, it may be borne in mind that a wire

about one tenth of an inch in diameter and one hundred feet long, held

vertical and insulated, with its bottom end about six feet from the

ground, has a capacity of 0.0002 of a microfarad, if no other earthed

vertical conductors are very near it. The moral of all this is that

the amount of electric energy which can be stored up in a simple

Marconi aerial is very limited, and is not much more than one-tenth of

a joule or one-fourteenth of a foot-pound, per hundred feet of 7/22

wire. The astonishing thing is that with so little storage of energy

it should be possible to transmit intelligence to a distance of a

hundred miles without connecting wires.

One consequence, however, of the small amount of energy which can be

accumulated in a simple Marconi aerial is that this energy is almost

entirely radiated in one oscillation or wave. Hence, strictly

speaking, a simple aerial of this type does not create a train of

waves in the ether, but probably at most a single impulse or two.

[Illustration: FIG. 9.--MARCONI-BRAUN SYSTEM OF INDUCING ELECTROMOTIVE

FORCE IN AN AERIAL, A. B, battery; K, key; I, induction coil; S, spark

gap; C, Leyden jar; E, earth plate; _ps_, oscillation transformer.]

We shall later on consider some consequences which follow from this

fact. Meanwhile, it may be explained that there are methods by which

not only a much larger amount of energy can be accumulated in

connection with an aerial, but more sustained oscillations created

than by the original Marconi method. One of these methods originated

with Professor Braun, of Strasburg, and a modification was first

described by Mr. Marconi in a lecture before the Society of Arts of

London.[7] In this method the charge in the aerial is not created by

the direct application to it of the secondary electromotive force of

an induction coil, but by means of an induced electromotive force

created in the aerial by an oscillation transformer. The method due to

Professor Braun is as follows: A condenser or Leyden jar has one

terminal, say, its inside, connected to one spark ball of an induction

coil. The other spark ball is connected to the outside of the Leyden

jar or condenser through the primary coil of a transformer of a

particular kind, called an oscillation transformer (see Fig. 9). The

spark balls are brought within a few millimetres of each other. When

the coil is set in operation, the jar is charged and discharged

through the spark gap, and electrical oscillations are set up in the

circuit consisting of the dielectric of the jar, the primary coil of

the oscillation transformer and the spark gap. The secondary circuit

of this oscillation transformer is connected in between the earth and

the insulated aerial wire; hence, when the oscillations take place in

the primary circuit, they induce other oscillations in the aerial

circuit. But the arrangement is not very effective unless, as is

shown by Mr. Marconi, the two circuits of the oscillation transformer

are tuned together.

We shall return presently to the consideration of this form of

transmitter; meanwhile we may notice that by means of such an

arrangement it is possible to create in the aerial a far greater

charging electromotive force than would be the case if the aerial were

connected directly to one terminal of the secondary circuit of the

induction coil, the other terminal being to earth, and the two

terminals connected as usual by spark balls. By the inductive

arrangement it is possible to create in an aerial electromotive forces

which are equivalent to a spark of a foot in length, and when the

length of the aerial is also properly proportioned the potential along

it will increase all the way up, until at the top or insulated end of

the aerial it may reach an amount capable of giving sparks several

feet in length. From the remarks already made on the analogy between

the closed organ-pipe and the Marconi aerial wire, it will be seen

that the wave which is radiated from the aerial must have a wave

length four times that of the aerial if the aerial is vibrating in its

fundamental manner. It is also possible to create electrical

oscillations in a vertical wire which are the harmonics of the

fundamental.

All musicians are aware that in the case of an organ-pipe if the pipe

is blown gently it sounds a note which is called the fundamental of

the pipe. The celebrated mathematician, Daniel Bernouilli, discovered

that an organ-pipe can be made to yield a succession of musical notes

by properly varying the pressure of the current of air blown into it.

If the pipe is an open pipe, and if we call the frequency of the

primary note obtained when the pipe is gently blown, unity, then when

we blow more strongly the pipe yields notes which are the harmonics of

the fundamental one; that is to say, notes which have frequencies

represented by the numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, &c. If, however, the pipe is

closed at the top, then over-blowing the pipe makes it yield the odd

harmonics or the tones which are related to the primary tone in the

ratio of 3, 5, 7, &c., to unity. Accordingly, if a stopped pipe gives

as its fundamental the note C, its first overtone will be the fifth

above the octave or G'.

[Illustration: FIG. 10.--SEIBT'S APPARATUS FOR SHOWING STATIONARY

WAVES IN LONG SOLENOID A. I, induction coil; S, spark gap; L,

inductance coil; C_{1}C_{2}, Leyden jars; E, earth wire.]

As already remarked, the aerial wire or radiator as used in Marconi

telegraphy may be looked upon as a kind of ether organ-pipe or siren

tube, and its electrical phenomena are in every respect similar to the

acoustic phenomena of the ordinary closed organ-pipe. When the aerial

is sounding its fundamental ether note, the conditions which pertain

are that there is a current flowing into the aerial at the lower end,

but at that point the variation in potential is very small, whereas at

the upper end there is no current, but the variations of potential are

very large. Accordingly, we say that at the upper end of the aerial

there is an antinode of potential and a node of current, and at the

bottom an antinode of current and a node of potential. By altering the

frequency of the electrical impulses we can create in the aerial an

arrangement of nodes of current or potential corresponding to the

overtones of a closed organ-pipe. But whatever may be the arrangement

the conditions must always hold that there is a node of current at

the upper end and an antidote of current at the lower end. In other

words, there are large variations of current at the place where the

aerial terminates on the spark-gap and no current at the upper end.

The first harmonic is formed where there is a node of potential at

one-third of the length of the aerial from the top. In this case we

have a node of potential not only at the lower end of the wire, but at

two-thirds of the way up. In the same way we can create in the closed

organ-pipe, by properly overblowing the pipe, a region about

two-thirds of the way up the pipe, where the pressure changes in the

air are practically no greater than they are at the mouthpiece. We can

make evident visually in a beautiful manner the existence of similar

stationary electrical waves in an aerial by means of an ingenious

arrangement devised by Dr. Georg Seibt, of Berlin. It consists of a

very long silk-covered copper wire, A (see Fig. 10), wound in a close

spiral of single layer round a wooden rod six feet long and about two

inches in diameter. This rod is insulated, and at the lower end the

wire is connected to a Leyden jar circuit, consisting of a Leyden jar

or jars and an inductance coil, L, the inductance of which can be

varied. Oscillations are set up in this jar circuit by means of an

induction-coil discharge, and the lower end of the long spiral wire is

attached to one point on the jar circuit. In this manner we can

communicate to the bottom end of the long spiral wire a series of

electric impulses, the time period of which depends upon the capacity

of the jar and the inductance of the discharge circuit. We can,

moreover, vary this frequency over wide limits. Parallel to the long

spiral wire is suspended another copper wire, E (see Fig. 10), and

between this wire and the silk-covered copper wire discharges take

place due to the potential difference between each part of the wire

and this long aerial wire. If we arrange matters so that the impulses

communicated to the bottom end of the long spiral wire correspond to

its fundamental note or periodic time, then in a darkened room we

shall see a luminous glow or discharge between the vertical wire and

the spiral wire, which increases in intensity all the way up to the

top of the spiral wire. The luminosity of this brush discharge at any

point is evidence of the potential of the spiral wire at that point,

and its distribution clearly demonstrates that the difference of

potential between the spiral wire and the aerial increases all the way

up from the bottom to the top of the spiral wire. In the next place,

by making a little adjustment and by varying the inductance of the jar

circuit, we can increase the frequency of the impulses which are

falling upon the spiral wire; and then it will be noticed that the

distribution of the brush discharge or luminosity is altered, and that

there is a maximum now at about one-third of the height of the spiral

wire, and a dark place at about two-thirds of the height, and another

bright place at the top, thus showing that we have a node of potential

at about two-thirds the way up the wire (see Fig. 11), and we have

therefore set up in the spiral wire electrical oscillations

corresponding to the first overtone. It is possible to show in the

same way the existence of the second harmonic in the coil, but the

luminosity then becomes too faint to be seen at a distance.

[Illustration: FIG. 11.--HARMONIC OSCILLATIONS IN LONG SOLENOID SHOWN

WITH SEIBT'S APPARATUS.]

An interesting form of aerial devised by Professor Slaby, of Berlin,

depends for its action entirely on the fact that the electrical

oscillations set up in it which radiate are harmonics of the

fundamental tone.

[Illustration: FIG. 12.--NON-RADIATIVE CLOSED LOOP AERIAL.]

[Illustration: FIG. 13.--SLABY'S LOOP RADIATOR.]

A closed vertical loop, A_{1}A_{2} (see Fig. 12), is formed by

erecting two parallel insulated wires vertically a few feet apart and

joining them together at the top. At the bottom these wires are

connected, with the secondary terminals of an induction coil, a

condenser, C, or Leyden jar, being bridged across the terminals and a

pair of spark balls, S, inserted in one side of the loop. It will

readily be seen that on setting the coil in action, oscillations will

take place in these vertical wires, but that if the oscillations are

simply the fundamental note of the system, then at any moment

corresponding to a current going up one side of the loop of wire there

must be a current coming down the other. Accordingly, an arrangement

of this kind, forming what is called a closed circuit, will not

radiate or radiates but very feebly. Professor Slaby found, however,

that it might be converted into a powerful radiator if we give the two

sides of the loop unequal capacity or inductance and at the same time

earth one of the lower ends of the loop, as shown in Fig. 13. By this

means it is possible to set up in the loop electrical overtones or

harmonics of the fundamental oscillation, and if we cause the system

to vibrate so as to produce its first odd harmonic, there is a

potential node at the lower end of both vertical sides of the loop, a

potential node on both vertical sides at two-thirds of the way up, and

a potential antinode at the summit of the loop; then, under these

circumstances, the closed loop of wire is in the same electrical

condition as if two simple Marconi aerials, both emitting their first

odd harmonic oscillation, were placed side by side and joined together

at the top.

It is a little difficult without the employment of mathematical

analysis to explain precisely the manner in which earthing one side of

the loop or making the loop unsymmetrical as regards inductance has

the effect of creating overtones in it. The following rough

illustration may, however, be of some assistance. Imagine a long

spiral metallic spring supported horizontally by threads. Let this

represent a conductor, and let any movement to or fro of a part of the

spring represent a current in that conductor. Suppose we take hold of

the spring at one end, we can move it bodily to and fro as a whole. In

this case, every part of the spring is moving one way or the other in

the same manner at the same time. This corresponds with the case in

which the discharge of the condenser through the uniform loop

conductor is a flow of electricity, all in one direction one way or

the other. The current is in the same direction in all parts of the

loop at the same time, and, therefore, if the current is going up one

side of the loop it is at the same time coming down the other side.

Hence the two sides of the loop are always in exact opposition as

regards the effect of the current in them on the external space, and

the loop does not radiate. Returning again to the case of the spring.

Supposing that we add a weight to one end of the spring by attaching

to it a metal ball, and then move the other end to and fro with

certain periodic motion, it will be found quite easy to set up in the

spring a pulsatory motion resembling the movement of the air in an

open organ-pipe. Under these circumstances both ends of the spring

will be moving inwards or outwards at the same time, and the central

portions of the spring, although being pressed and expanded slightly,

are moving to and fro very little. This corresponds in the case of the

looped aerial with a current flowing up or down both sides at the same

time; in other words, when this mode of electrical oscillation is

established in the loop, its electrical condition is just that of two

simple Marconi aerials joined together at the top and vibrating in

their fundamental manner. Accordingly, if one side of the double loop

is earthed, we then have an arrangement which radiates waves.

Professor Slaby found that by giving one side of the loop less

inductance than the other, and at the same time earthing the side

having greater inductance at the bottom, he was able to make an

arrangement which radiated, not in virtue of the normal oscillations

of the condenser, but in virtue of the harmonic oscillations set up in

the conductor itself. The mathematical theory of this radiator has

been very fully developed by Dr. Georg Seibt.

It will be seen, therefore, that there are several ways in which we

may start into existence oscillations in an aerial. First, the aerial

may be insulated, and we may charge it to a high potential and allow

this charge suddenly to rush out. Although this process gives rise to

a disturbance in the ether, as already explained, it is analogous to a

pop or explosion in the air, rather than to a sustained musical note.

The exact acoustic analogue would be obtained if we imagine a long

pipe pumped full of air and then suddenly opened at one end. The air

would rush out, and, communicating a blow to the outer air, would

create an atmospheric disturbance appreciated as a noise or small

explosion. This is what happens when we cut the string and let the

cork fly out from a bottle of champagne. At the same time, the

inertia of the air rushing out of the tube would cause it to overshoot

the mark, and a short time after opening the valve the tube, so far

from containing compressed air, would contain air slightly rarefied

near its mouth, and this rarefication would travel back up the tube in

the form of wave motion, and, being reflected as condensation at the

closed end, travel down again; and so after being reflected once or

twice at the open or closed end, become damped out very rapidly in

virtue of both air friction and the radiation of the energy. In the

case, however, of the ordinary organ-pipe, we do not depend merely

upon a store of compressed air put into the pipe, but we have a store

of energy to draw upon in the form of the large amount of compressed

air contained in a wind chest, which is being continually supplied by

the bellows. This store of compressed air is fed into the organ-pipe,

with the result that we obtain a continuous radiation of sound waves.

The first case, in which the only store of energy is the compressed

air originally contained in the pipe, illustrates the operation of the

simple Marconi aerial. The second case, in which there is a larger

store of energy to draw upon, the organ-pipe being connected to a wind

chest, illustrates the Marconi-Braun method, in which an aerial is

employed to radiate a store of electric energy contained in a

condenser, gradually liberated by the aerial in the form of a series

of electrical oscillations and waves. In this arrangement the

condenser corresponds to the wind chest, and it is continually kept

full of electrical energy by means of the induction coil or

transformer, which answers to the bellows of the organ. From the

condenser, electrical energy is discharged each time the spark

discharge passes at a spark gap in the form of electrical oscillations

set up in the primary circuit of an oscillation transformer. The

secondary circuit of this transformer is connected in between the

earth and the aerial, and therefore may be considered as part of it,

and, accordingly, the energy which is radiated from the aerial is not

simply that which is stored up in it in virtue of its own small

capacity, but that which is stored up in the much larger capacity

represented by the primary condenser or, as it may be called, the

electrical wind chest. By the second arrangement we have therefore the

means of radiating more or less continuous trains of electric waves,

corresponding with each spark discharge. To create powerful

oscillations in the aerial, one condition of success is that there

shall be an identity in time-period between the circuit of the aerial

and that of the primary condenser. The aerial is an open circuit which

has capacity with respect to the earth, and it has also inductance,

partly due to the wire of the aerial and partly due to the secondary

circuit of the oscillation transformer in series with it. The primary

circuit or spark circuit has capacity--viz., the capacity of the

energy-storing condenser--and it has also inductance--viz., the

inductance of the primary circuit of the oscillation transformer. We

shall consider at a later stage more particularly the details of

syntonising arrangements, but meanwhile it may be said that one

condition for setting up powerful waves by means of the above

arrangement is that the electrical time-period of both the two

circuits mentioned shall be the same. This involves adjusting the

inductance and capacity so that the product of conductance and

capacity for each of these two circuits is numerically the same.

Instead of employing an oscillation transformer between the condenser

circuit and the aerial, the aerial may be connected directly to some

point on the condenser circuit at which the potential oscillations are

large, and we have then another arrangement devised by Professor Braun

(see Fig. 14). In this case, in order to accumulate large potential

oscillations at the top of the aerial, it is, as we have seen,

necessary that the length of the aerial shall be one quarter the

length of the wave. If, therefore, the electrical oscillations in the

condenser circuit are at the rate of N per second, in other words,

have a frequency N, the wave-length correponding to this frequency is

given by the expression,

3x10^{10}/N cms.

The number 3x10^{10} is the value in centimetres per second of the

velocity of the electromagnetic wave, and is identical with that of

light. The corresponding resonant length of the aerial is therefore

one-fourth of this wave-length, or 3x10^{10}/4N. Generally speaking,

however, it will be found that with any length of aerial which is

practicable, say, 200 feet or 6,000 cms., this proportion necessitates

rather a high frequency in the primary oscillation circuit. In the

case considered--viz., for an aerial 200 feet in height--the

oscillations in the primary circuit must have a frequency of one and a

quarter million. This high frequency can only be obtained either by

greatly reducing the inductance of the primary discharge circuit, or

reducing the capacity. If we reduce the capacity, we thereby greatly

reduce the storage of energy, and it is not practicable to reduce the

inductance below a certain amount.

[Illustration: FIG. 14.--BRAUN'S RADIATOR. B, battery; I, induction

coil; K, key; S, spark-gap; L, inductance coil; C, condenser; A,

aerial.]

Summing up, it may be said that there are three, and, as far as the

writer is aware, at present only three, modes of exciting the

electrical oscillations in an aerial wire. First, the aerial may

itself be used as an electrical reservoir and charged to a high

potential and suddenly discharged to the earth. This is the original

Marconi method. The second method, due to Braun, consist of attaching

the aerial to some point on an oscillation circuit consisting of a

condenser, an inductance coil and a spark gap, in series with one

another, and charging and discharging the condenser across the spark

gap so as to create alterations of potential at some point on the

oscillation circuit. The length of the aerial must then be so

proportioned as above described that it is resonant to this frequency.

Thirdly, we may employ the arrangement involving an oscillation

transformer, in which the oscillations in the primary condenser

circuit are made to induce others in the aerial circuit, the

time-period of the two circuits being the same. This method may be

called the Braun-Marconi method. Professor Slaby has combined together

in a certain way the original Marconi simple aerial with the resonant

quarter-wave-length wire of Braun. He constructs what he calls a

_multiplicator_, which is really a wire wound into a loose spiral

connected at one point to an oscillation circuit consisting of a

condenser inductance, the length of this wire being proportioned so

that there is a great resonance or multiplication of tension or

potential at its free end. This free end is then attached to the lower

end of an ordinary Marconi aerial, and serves to charge it with a

higher potential than could be obtained by the use of the induction

coil directly attached to it.

* * * * *

We have next to consider the appliances for creating the necessary

charging electromotive force, and for storing and releasing this

charge at pleasure, so as to generate the required electrical

oscillations in the aerial.

It is essential that this generator should be able to create not only

large potential difference, but also a certain minimum electric

current. Accordingly, we are limited at the present moment to one of

two appliances--viz., the induction coil or the alternating current

transformer.

It will not be necessary to enter into an explanation of the action of

the induction coil. The coil generally employed for wireless

telegraphy is technically known as a ten-inch coil--_i.e._, a coil

which is capable of giving a ten-inch spark between pointed conductors

in air at ordinary pressure. The construction of a large coil of this

description is a matter requiring great technical skill, and is not to

be attempted without considerable previous experience in the

manufacture of smaller coils. The secondary circuit of a ten-inch coil

is formed of double silk-covered copper wire; generally speaking, the

gauge called No. 36, or else No. 34 S.W.G. is used, and a length of

ten to seventeen miles of wire is employed on the secondary circuit,

according to the gauge of wire selected. For the precautions necessary

in constructing the secondary coil, practical manuals must be

consulted.[8]

Very great care is required in the insulation of the secondary circuit

of an induction coil to be used in Hertzian wave telegraphy, because

the secondary circuit is then subjected to impulsive electromotive

forces lasting for a short time, having a much higher electromotive

force than that which the coil itself normally produces.

The primary circuit of a ten-inch coil generally consists of a length

of 300 or 400 feet of thick insulated copper wire. In such a coil the

secondary circuit would require about ten miles of No. 34 H.C. copper

wire, making 50,000 turns round the core. It would have a resistance

at ordinary temperatures of 6,600 ohms, and an inductance of 460

henrys. The primary circuit, if formed of 360 turns of No. 12 H.C.

copper wire, would have a resistance of 0.36 of an ohm, and an

inductance of 0.02 of a henry.

An important matter in connection with an induction coil to be used

for wireless telegraphy is the resistance of the secondary circuit.

The purpose for which we employ the coil is to charge a condenser of

some kind. If a constant electromotive force (V) is applied to the

terminals of a condenser having a capacity C, then the difference of

potential (_v_) of the terminals of the condenser at any time that the

contact is made is given by the expression:

v = V(1 - e^{-t/RC}).

In the above equation, the letter e stands for the number 2.71828, the

base of the Napierian logarithms, and R is the resistance in series

with the condenser, of which the capacity is C, to which the

electromotive force is applied. This equation can easily be deduced

from first principles,[9] and it shows that the potential difference

_v_ of the terminals of the condenser does not instantly attain a

value equal to the impressed electromotive force V, but rises up

gradually. Thus, for instance, suppose that a condenser of one

microfarad is being charged through a resistance of one megohm by an

impressed voltage of 100 volts, the equation shows that at the end of

the first second after contact, the terminal potential difference of

the condenser will be only 63 volts, at the end of the second second,

86 volts, and so on.

Since _e_^{-10} is an exceedingly small number, it follows that in 10

seconds the condenser would be practically charged with a voltage

equal to 100 volts. The product CR in the above equation is called the

_time-constant_ of the condenser, and we may say that the condenser is

practically charged after an interval of time equal to ten times the

time-constant, counting from the moment of first contact between the

condenser and the source of constant voltage. The time-constant is to

be reckoned as the product of the capacity (C) in microfarads, by the

resistance of the charging circuit (R) in megohms. To take another

illustration. Supposing we are charging a condenser having a capacity

of one-hundreth of a microfarad, through a resistance of ten thousand

ohms. Since ten thousand ohms is equal to one-hundredth of a megohm,

the time-constant would be equal to one-ten-thousandth of a second,

and ten times this time-constant would be equal to a thousandth of a

second. Hence, in order to charge the above capacity through the above

resistance, it is necessary that the contact between the source of

voltage and the condenser should be maintained for at least

one-thousandth part of a second.

In discussing the methods of interrupting the circuit, we shall return

to this matter, but, meanwhile, it may be said that in order to secure

a small time-constant for the charging circuit, it is desirable that

the secondary circuit of the induction coil should have as low a

resistance as possible. This, of course, involves winding the

secondary circuit with a rather thick wire. If, however, we employ a

wire larger in size than No. 34, or at the most No. 32, the bulk and

the cost of the induction coil began to rise very rapidly. Hence, as

in all other departments of electrical construction, the details of

the design are more or less a matter of compromise. Generally

speaking, however, it may be said that the larger the capacity which

is to be charged, the lower should be the resistance of the secondary

circuit of the induction coil.

In the practical construction of induction coils for wireless

telegraphy, manufacturers have departed from the stock designs. We are

all familiar with the appearance of the instrument maker's induction

coil; its polished mahogany base, its lacquered brass fittings, and

its secondary bobbin constructed of and covered with ebonite. But such

a coil, although it may look very pretty on the lecture table, is yet

very unsuited to positions in which it may be used in connection with

Hertzian wave telegraphy.

Three important adjuncts of the induction coil are the primary

condenser, the interrupter and the primary key. The interrupter is the

arrangement for intermitting the primary current. We have in some way

or other to rapidly interrupt the primary current, and the torrent of

sparks that then appears between the secondary terminals of the coil

is due to the electromotive force set up in the secondary circuit at

each break or interruption of the primary circuit. We may divide

interrupters into five classes.

We have first the well-known hammer interrupter which Continental

writers generally attribute to Neef or Wagner.[10] In this

interrupter, the magnetisation of the iron core of the coil is caused

to attract a soft-iron block fixed at the top of a brass spring, and

by so doing to interrupt the primary circuit between two platinum

contacts. Mr. Apps, of London, added an arrangement for pressing back

the spring against the back contact, and the form of hammer that is

now generally employed is therefore called an Apps break.

As the ten-inch coil takes a primary current of ten amperes at sixteen

volts when in operation, it requires very substantial platinum

contacts to withstand the interruption of this current continuously

without damage. The small platinum contacts that are generally put on

these coils by instrument makers are very soon worn out in practical

wireless telegraph work. If a hammer break is used at all, it is

essential to make the contacts of very stout pieces of platinum, and

from time to time, as they get burnt away or roughened, they must be

smoothed up with a fine file. It does not require much skill to keep

the hammer contacts in good order and prevent them from sticking

together and becoming damaged by the break spark.

By regulating the pressure of the spring against the back contact, by

means of an adjusting screw, the rate at which the break vibrates can

be regulated, but as a rule it is not possible, with a hammer break,

to obtain more than about 800 interruptions per minute, or, say,

twelve a second. The hammer break is usually operated by the magnetism

of the iron core of the coil, but for some reasons it is better to

separate the break from the coil altogether, and to work it by an

independent electromagnet, which, however, may be excited by a current

from the same battery supplying the induction coil. For coils up to

the ten-inch size the hammer break can be used when very rapid

interruptions are not required. It is not in general practicable to

work coils larger than the ten-inch size with a platinum contact

hammer break, as such a butt contact becomes overheated and sticks if

more than ten amperes is passed through it. In the case of larger

coils, we have to employ some form of interrupter in which mercury or

a conducting liquid forms one of the contact surfaces.

The next class of interrupter is the vibrating or hand-worked mercury

break, in which a platinum or steel pin is made to vibrate in and out

of mercury. This movement may be effected by the attraction of an iron

armature by an electromagnet, or by the varying magnetism of the core

of the coil, or it may be effected more slowly by hand.

The mercury surface must be covered with water, alcohol, paraffin or

creosote oil to prevent oxidation and to extinguish the break spark.

The interruption of the primary current obtained by the mercury break

is more sudden than that obtained by the platinum contact in air, in

consequence of the more rapid extinction of the spark; hence the

sparks obtained from coils fitted with mercury interrupters are

generally from twenty to thirty per cent. longer than those obtained

from the same coil under the same conditions, with platinum contact

interrupters. The mercury breaks will not, however, work well unless

cleaned at regular intervals by emptying off the oil and rinsing well

with clean water, and hence they require rather more attention than

platinum interrupters. It is not generally possible to obtain so many

interruptions per minute with the simple vibrating mercury interrupter

as with the ordinary hammer interrupter. The mercury interrupter has,

however, the advantage that the contact time during which the circuit

is kept closed may be made longer than is the case with the hammer

break. Also, if fresh water is allowed to flow continuously over the

mercury surface, it can be kept clean, and the break will then operate

for considerable periods of time without attention. The mercury

interrupter may be worked by a separate electromagnet or by the

magnetism of the core of the induction coil.

The third class of interrupter may be called the motor interrupter, of

which a large number have been invented in recent years. In this

interrupter some form of a continuously-rotating electromotor is

employed to make and break a mercury or other liquid contact. In one

simple form the motor shaft carries an eccentric, which simply dips a

platinum point into mercury, or else a platinum horseshoe into two

mercury surfaces, making in this manner an interruption of the primary

circuit at one or two places. As a small motor can easily be run at

twelve hundred revolutions per minute, or twenty per second, it is

possible to secure easily in this manner a uniform rate of

interruption of the primary current at the rate of about twenty per

second. If, however, much higher speeds are employed, then the time of

contact becomes abbreviated, and the ability of the coil to charge a

capacity is diminished.

Professor J. Trowbridge has described an effective form of motor break

for large coils, in which the interruption is caused by withdrawing a

stout platinum wire from a dilute solution of sulphuric acid, and by

this means he increased the spark given by a coil provided with hammer

break and condenser from fifteen inches to thirty inches when using

the liquid break and no condenser.[11]

A good form of motor-interrupter, due to Dr. Mackenzie Davidson,

consists of a slate disc bearing pin contacts fixed on the prolonged

steel axle of a motor placed in an inclined position; the disc and the

lower part of the axle lie in a vessel filled one-third with mercury

and two-thirds with paraffin oil. The circuit is made and broken by

the revolution of the disc causing the pins to enter and leave the

mercury. The speed of the motor can be regulated by a small

resistance, and can be adapted to the electromotive force used in the

primary circuit. When the motor is running slowly the interrupter can

be used with a low electromotive force, that is to say, something

between twelve and twenty volts, but with a higher speed a large

electromotive force can be used without danger of overheating the

primary coil, and with an electromotive force of about fifty volts,

the interruptions may be so rapid that an unbroken arc of flame,

resembling an alternating-current arc, springs between the secondary

terminals of the coil.

Mr. Tesla has devised numerous forms of rotating mercury break. In

one, a star-shaped metal disc revolves in a box so that its points dip

into mercury covered with oil, and make and break contact. In another

form, a jet of mercury plays against a similar shaped rotating wheel.

For details, the reader must consult the fuller descriptions in _The

Electrical World_ of New York, Vol. XXXII., p. 111, 1898; also Vol.

XXXIII., p. 247; or _Science Abstracts_, Vol. II., pp. 46 and 47,

1898.

The fourth class of interrupter is called a turbine interrupter. In

this appliance, a jet of mercury is forced out of a small aperture by

means of a centrifugal pump, and is made to squirt against a metal

plate, and interrupted intermittently by a toothed wheel made of

insulating material rotated by the motor which drives the pump. The

current supplying the coil passes through or along this jet of

mercury, and is therefore rendered intermittent when the wheel

revolves. In the case of this interrupter, the duration of the

contacts, as well as the number of interruptions per second, is under

control, and for this reason better results are probably obtained with

it than with any other form of break.

A description of a turbine mercury break devised by M. Max Levy was

given in the _Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift_, Vol. XX., p. 717,

October 12, 1899 (see also _Science Abstracts_, Vol. III., p. 63,

abstract No. 165) as follows:--

A toothed wheel made of insulating material carries from 6 to 24

teeth, and can be made to rotate from 300 to 1,000 times per minute,

the interruptions being thus regulated between 5 and 400 per second.

By raising or lowering the position of the jet of mercury and that of

the plate against which it strikes, the duration of the contact can

be varied, so that it is possible to regulate this period without

disturbing the number of interruptions per second.

The sparks obtained from a coil worked with a turbine interrupter have

more quantity than the sparks obtained with any other interrupter

under similar conditions, and the coil can be worked with a far higher

voltage than is possible when using the hammer break. In this manner,

the appearance of the secondary sparks can be varied from the thin

snappy sparks given by the hammer break to the thick flame-like arc

sparks given by the electrolytic break. This break can be adapted for

any voltage from twelve to two hundred and fifty volts, and the

primary circuit cannot be closed before the interrupter is acting. The

mercury in the break is generally covered with alcohol or paraffin oil

to reduce oxidation, and the appliance is nearly noiseless when in

operation. The mercury has to be cleaned at intervals, if the

interrupter is much used. If alcohol is used to cover the mercury, the

cleaning is very simple; the break requires only to be rinsed under a

water tap. When paraffin oil is used, the cleaning is generally

effected with the help of a few ounces of sulphuric acid in a very few

minutes. It is best, however, to clean the mercury continuously by

allowing the water to flow over it.

The motor driving the centrifugal pump and the fan can be wound for

any voltage, and it is best to have it so arranged that this motor

works on the same battery which supplies the primary circuit of the

coil, the two circuits working parallel together. A rheostat can be

added to the motor circuit to regulate the speed.

The turbine break driven by an independent motor, which is kept always

running, has another advantage over the hammer break in practical

wireless telegraphy, viz., that a useful secondary spark can be

secured with a shorter time of closure of the primary circuit, since

there is no inertia to overcome as in the case of the hammer break.

This latter form has only continued in use because of its simplicity

and ease of management by ordinary operators.

The mercury turbine interrupter has been extensively adopted both in

the German and British navies in connection with induction coils used

for wireless telegraphy.

Lastly we have the electrolytic interrupters, the first of which was

introduced by Dr. Wehnelt, of Charlottenburg, in the year 1899, and

modified by subsequent inventors. In its original form, a glass vessel

filled with dilute sulphuric acid (one of acid to five or else ten

parts of water) contains two electrodes of very different sizes; one

is a large lead electrode formed of a piece of sheet lead laid round

the interior of the vessel, and the other is a short piece of platinum

wire projecting from the end of a glass or porcelain tube. The smaller

of these electrodes is made the positive, and the large one the

negative. If this electrolytic cell is connected in series with the

primary circuit of the induction coil (the condenser being cut out)

and supplied with an electromotive force from forty to eighty volts,

an electrolytic action takes place which interrupts the current

periodically.[12] An enormous number of interruptions can, by suitable

adjustment, be produced per second, and the appearance of a discharge

from the secondary terminals of the coil, while using the Wehnelt

break, more resembles an alternate-current arc than the usual

disruptive spark.

At the time when the Wehnelt break was first introduced, great

interest was excited in it, and the technical journals in 1899 were

full of discussions as to the theory of its operation.[13] The general

facts concerning the Wehnelt break are that the electrolyte must be

dilute sulphuric acid in the proportion of one of acid to five or ten

of water. The large lead plate must be the cathode or negative pole,

and the anode or positive pole must be a platinum wire, about a

millimetre in diameter, and projecting one or two millimetres from the

pointed end of a porcelain, glass or other acid-proof insulating tube.

The aperture through which the platinum wire works must be so tight

that acid cannot enter, yet it is desirable that the platinum wire

should be capable of being projected more or less from the aperture by

means of an adjusting screw. The glass vessel which contains these two

electrodes should be of considerable size, holding, say, a quart of

fluid, and it is better to include this vessel in a larger one in

which water can be placed to cool the electrolyte, as the latter gets

very warm when the break is used continuously. If such an electrolytic

cell has a continuous electromotive force applied to it tending to

force a current through the electrolyte from the platinum wire to the

lead plate, we can distinguish three stages in its operation, which

are determined by the electromotive force and the inductance in the

circuit. First, if the electromotive force is below sixteen or twenty

volts, then ordinary and silent electrolysis of the liquid proceeds,

bubbles of oxygen being liberated from the platinum wire and hydrogen

set free against the lead plate. If the electromotive force is raised

above twenty-five volts, then if there is no inductance in the

circuit, the continuous flow of current proceeds, but if the circuit

of the electrolyte possesses a certain minimum inductance, the

character of the current flow changes, and it becomes intermittent,

and the cell acts as an interrupter, the current being interrupted

from 100 to 2,000 times per second, according to the electromotive

force and the inductance of the circuit. Under these conditions, the

cell produces a rattling noise and a luminous glow appears round the

tip of the platinum wire. Thus, in a particular case, with an

inductance of 0.004 millihenry in the circuit of a Wehnelt break, no

interruption of the circuit took place, but with one millihenry of

inductance in the circuit, and with an electromotive force of 48

volts, the current became intermittent at the rate of 930 per second,

and by increasing the voltage to 120 volts, the intermittency rose to

1,850 a second.

The Wehnelt break acts best as an interrupter with an electromotive

force from 40 to 80 volts. At higher voltages a third stage sets in:

the luminous glow round the platinum wire disappears, and it becomes

surrounded with a layer of vapour, as observed by MM. Violle and

Chassagny; the interruptions of current cease, and the platinum wire

becomes red hot. If there is no inductance in the circuit, the

interrupter stage never sets in at all, but the first stage passes

directly into the third stage. In the first stage bubbles of oxygen

rise steadily from the platinum wire, and in the interrupted stage

they rise at longer intervals, but regularly. The cell will not,

however, act as a break at all unless some inductance exists in the

circuit.

In applying the Wehnelt break to an induction coil, the condenser is

discarded and also the ordinary hammer break, and the Wehnelt break is

placed in circuit with the primary coil. In some cases, the inductance

of the primary coil alone is sufficient to start the break in

operation, but with voltages above 50 or 60, it is generally necessary

to supplement the inductance of the primary coil by another inductive

coil. The best form of Wehnelt break for operating induction coils is

the one with multiple anodes (see Dr. Marchant, _The Electrician_,

Vol. XLII., p. 841, 1899), and when it has to be used for long

periods, the cathode may advantageously be formed of a spiral of lead

pipe, through which cold water is made to circulate.

Another form of electrolytic break was introduced by Mr. Caldwell. In

this, a vessel containing dilute sulphuric acid is divided into two

parts. In the partition is a small hole, and in the two compartments

are electrodes of sheet lead. The small hole causes an intermittency

in the current which converts the arrangement into a break. Mr.

Campbell Swinton modified the above arrangement by making the

partition to consist of a sort of porcelain test-tube with a hole in

the bottom. This hole can be more or less plugged up by a glass rod

drawn out to a point, and this is used to more or less close the hole.

This porcelain vessel contains dilute acid and stands in a larger

vessel of acid, and lead electrodes are placed in both compartments.

The current and intermittency can be regulated by more or less closing

the aperture between the two regions.

When the Wehnelt break is applied to an ordinary ten-inch induction

coil, and the inductance of the primary circuit and the electromotive

force varied until the break interrupts the current regularly and with

the frequency of some hundred a second, the character of the secondary

discharge is entirely different from its appearance with the ordinary

hammer break. The thin blue lightning-like sparks are then replaced by a

thicker mobile flaming discharge, which resembles an alternating-current

arc, and, when carefully examined or photographed, is found to consist

of a number of separate discharges superimposed upon one another in

slightly different positions.

Many theories have been adopted as to the action of the break, but

time will not permit us to examine these. Professor S. P. Thompson and

Dr. Marchant have suggested a theory of resonance.[14] One difficulty

in explaining the action of the break is created by the fact that it

will not work if the platinum wire is made a cathode.

Although the Wehnelt break has some advantages in connection with the

use of the induction coil for Roentgen ray work, its utility as far as

regards Hertzian wave telegraphy is not by any means so marked. It has

already been explained that, in order to charge a condenser of a given

capacity at a constant voltage, the electromotive force must be

applied for a certain minimum time, which is determined by the value

of the capacity and the resistance of the secondary circuit of the

induction coil. If the coil is a ten-inch coil and has a secondary

resistance of, say, 6,000 ohms, and if the capacity to be charged has

a value, say, of one-thirtieth of a microfarad, then the time-constant

of the circuit is 1/5,000 of a second. Therefore, the contact with the

condenser must be maintained for at least 1/500 of a second, during

the time that the secondary electromotive force of the coil is at its

maximum, so that the condenser may become charged to a voltage which

the coil is then capable of producing.

In the induction coil, the electromotive force generated in the

secondary coil at the "break" of the primary current is higher than

that at the "make," and this electromotive force, other things being

equal, depends upon the rate at which the magnetism of the iron core

dies away, and its duration is shorter in proportion as the whole time

occupied in the disappearance of the magnetism is less. The Wehnelt

break does not increase the actual secondary electromotive force, nor

apparently its duration, but it greatly increases the number of times

per second this electromotive force makes it appearance. Hence this

break increases the current, but not the electromotive force in the

secondary coil. It, therefore, does not assist us in the direction

required--viz., in prolonging the duration of the secondary

electromotive force to enable larger capacities to be charged.

The important point in connection with the working of a coil used for

charging a condenser is not the length of spark which the coil can

give alone, but the length of spark which can be obtained between

small balls attached to the secondary terminals, when these terminals

are also connected to the two surfaces of the condenser. Thus, a coil

may give a ten-inch spark if worked alone, but on a capacity of

one-thirtieth of a microfarad it may not be able to give more than a

five-millimetre spark. Hence, in describing the value of a coil for

wireless telegraph purposes, it is not the least use to state the

length of spark which the coil will give between the pointed

conductors in air, but we must know the spark length which it will

give between brass balls, say, 1 centimetre in diameter, connected to

the secondary terminals, when these terminals are also short-circuited

by a stated capacity, the spark not exceeding that length at which it

becomes non-oscillatory.

A good way of describing the value of an induction coil for wireless

telegraph purposes is to state the length of oscillatory spark which

can be produced between balls one centimetre in diameter connected to

the secondary terminals, when these balls are short-circuited by a

condenser having a capacity, say, of one-hundredth of a microfarad,

and also one-tenth of a microfarad.

If a hammer or motor interrupter is employed with the coil, then a

primary condenser must be connected across the points between which

the primary circuit is broken. This condenser generally consists of

sheets of tinfoil alternated with sheets of paraffin paper, and for a

ten-inch coil may have a capacity of about 0.4 or 0.5 of a

microfarad.[15]

Lord Rayleigh discovered that if the interruption of the primary

circuit is sufficiently sudden and complete, as when the primary

circuit is severed by a bullet from a gun, the primary condenser can

be removed and yet the sparks obtained from the secondary circuit are

actually longer than those obtained with the condenser and the

ordinary break.[16]

In the use, however, of the coil for Hertzian wave telegraphy, with

all interrupters except the Wehnelt break a condenser of suitable

capacity must be joined across the break points.

Turning in the next place to the primary key, or signalling

interrupter, it is necessary to be able to control the torrent of

sparks between the secondary terminals of the coil, and to cut them up

into long and short periods in accordance with the letters of the

Morse alphabet. This is done by means of the primary key. The primary

key generally consists of an ordinary massive single contact key with

heavy platinum contacts. As the current to be interrupted amounts to

about ten amperes and is flowing in a highly inductive circuit, the

spark at break is considerable. If the attempt is made to extinguish

this spark by making the contacts move rapidly away from one another

through a long distance, in other words, by using a key with a wide

movement, then the speed at which the signals can be set is greatly

diminished. The speed of sending greatly depends upon the time taken

to move the key up and down between sending two dots, and hence a

short range key sends quicker than a long range key. If it is desired

to use a short range key, then some method must be employed to

extinguish the spark at the contacts. This is done in one of three

ways: Either by using a high resistance coil to short-circuit these

contacts, or by a condenser, or by a magnetic blow-out, as in the case

of an electric tramcar circuit controller. Of these, the magnetic

blow-out is probably the best.

Mr. Marconi has designed a signalling key which performs the function

not only of interrupting the primary circuit, but at the same time

breaks connection between the receiving appliance and the aerial.

The author has designed for signalling purposes a multiple contact key

which interrupts the circuit simultaneously in ten or twelve different

places. The particular point about this break is the means which are

taken to make the twelve interruptions absolutely simultaneous. If

these interruptions are not simultaneous, the spark always takes place

at the contact which is broken first, but if the circuit is

interrupted in a dozen places quite simultaneously, then the spark is

cut up into a dozen different portions, and the spark at each contact

is very much diminished. By this break, voltages up to two thousand

volts may be quite easily dealt with.

Various forms of break have been devised in which the circuit is

broken under oil or insulating fluids, but, generally speaking, these

devices are not very portable, and a dry contact between platinum

surfaces with appropriate means for cutting up the spark and blowing

it out so that the mechanical movement of the switch may be small is

the best thing to use.

The signalling key is really a very important part of the transmitting

arrangement, because whatever may be the improvements in receiving

instruments, it is not possible to receive faster than we can send. A

great many statements have appeared in the daily papers as to the

possibility of receiving hundreds of words a minute by Hertzian wave

telegraphy, but the fact remains that whatever may be the sensibility

of the receiving appliance, the rate at which telegraphy of any kind

can be conducted is essentially dependent upon the rate at which the

signals can be sent, and this in turn is largely dependent upon the

mechanical movement which the key has to make to interrupt the primary

circuit, and so interrupt the secondary discharge.

In order to make the separation of the contact points of the switch as

small as possible, and yet prevent an arc being established, various

blow-out devices have been employed. The simplest arrangement for this

purpose is a powerful permanent magnet so placed that its inter-polar

field embraces the contact points and is at right angles to them.

As already explained, the applicability of the induction coil in

wireless telegraphy is limited by the fact of the high resistance of

the secondary circuit and the small current that can be supplied from

it. Data are yet wanting to show what is the precise efficiency of the

induction coil, as used in Hertzian wave telegraphy, but there are

reasons for believing that it does not exceed 50 or 60 per cent.

Where large condensers have to be charged--in other words, where we

have to deal with larger powers--we are obliged to discard the

induction coil and to employ the alternating-current transformer. But

this introduces us to a new class of difficulties. If an

alternating-current transformer wound for a secondary voltage, say, of

20,000 or 30,000 volts, has its primary circuit connected to an

alternator, then if the secondary terminals, to which are connected

two spark balls, are gradually brought within striking distance of one

another, the moment we do this an alternating-current arc starts

between these balls. If the transformer is a small one, there is no

difficulty in extinguishing this arc by withdrawing the secondary

terminals, but if the transformer is a large one, say, of ten or

twenty kilowatts, dangerous effects are apt to ensue when such an

experiment is tried. The short circuiting of the secondary circuit

almost entirely annuls the inductance of the primary circuit. There

is, therefore, a rush of current into the transformer, and if it is

connected to an alternator of low armature resistance the fuses are

generally blown and other damage done.

Let us supppse, then, that the secondary terminals of the transformer

are also connected to a condenser. On bringing together the spark

balls connected with the secondary terminals we may have one or more

oscillatory discharges, but the process will not be continuous,

because the moment that the alternating-current arc starts between the

spark balls it reduces their difference of potential to a

comparatively low value, and hence the charge taken by the condenser

is very small, and, moreover, the circuit is not interrupted

periodically so as to re-start a train of oscillations.

When, therefore, we desire to employ an alternating-current

transformer as a source of electromotive force, although it may have

the advantage that the resistance of the secondary circuit of the

transformer is generally small compared with that of the secondary

circuit of an induction coil, yet, nevertheless, we are confronted

with two practical difficulties: (1) How to control the primary

current flowing into the transformer, and (2) how to destroy the

alternating-current arc between the spark balls and reduce the

discharge entirely to the disruptive or oscillatory discharge of the

condenser.

The control over the current can be obtained, in accordance with a

plan suggested by the author, by inserting in the primary circuit of

the transformer two variable choking coils. The form in which it is

preferred to construct these is that of a cylindrical bobbin standing

upon a laminated cross-piece of iron. These bobbins can have let down

into them an =E=-shaped piece of laminated iron, so as to complete the

magnetic circuit, and thus raise the inductance of the bobbin. By

placing two of these variable choking coils in series with the primary

circuit, the current is under perfect control. We can fix a minimum

value below which the current shall not fall, by adjusting the

position of the cores of these two choking coils, and we can then

cause that current to be increased up to a certain limit which it

cannot exceed, by short-circuiting one of these choking coils by an

appropriate switch. Several ways have been suggested for extinguishing

the alternating current arc which forms between the spark balls

connected to the secondary terminals when these are brought within a

certain distance of one another. One of these is due to Mr. Tesla. He

places a strong electromagnet so that its lines of magnetic flux pass

transversely between the spark balls. When the discharge takes place

the electric arc is blown out, but if the balls are short-circuited by

a condenser the oscillatory discharge of the condenser still takes

place across the spark gap. Professor Elihu Thomson achieves the same

result by employing a blast of air thrown on the spark gap. This has

the effect of destroying the alternating-current arc, but still leaves

the oscillating discharge of the condenser. The action is somewhat

tedious to explain in words, but it can easily be understood that the

blast of air, by continually breaking down the alternating-current arc

which tends to form, allows the condenser connected to the spark balls

to become charged with the potential of the secondary circuit of the

transformer, and that this condenser then discharges across the spark

gap, producing an oscillatory discharge in the usual manner. The

author has found that, without the use of any air blast or

electromagnet, simple adjustment of the double choking coil in the

primary circuit of the transformer, as above described, is sufficient

to bring about the desired result, when the capacity of the condenser

is adjusted to be in resonance.

Another method, which has been adopted by M. d'Arsonval, is to cause

the spark to pass between two balls placed at the extremities of

metal rods, which are in rapid rotation like the spokes of a wheel. In

this case, the draught of air produced by the passage of the spark

balls blows out the arc and performs the same function as the blast of

air in Professor Elihu Thomson's method. When these adjustments are

properly made, it is possible, by means of a condenser and an

alternating-current transformer supplied with current from an

alternator, to create a rapidly intermittent oscillatory discharge,

the sparks of which succeed one another so quickly that it appears

almost continuous. When using a large transformer and condenser, the

noise and brilliancy of these sparks are almost unbearable, and the

eyes may be injured by looking at this spark for more than a moment.

In the construction of transformers intended to be used in this

manner, very special precautions have to be taken in the insulation of

the primary and secondary circuits, and the insulation of these from

the core.

It may be remarked in passing that experimenting with large

high-tension transformers coupled to condensers of large capacity is

exceedingly dangerous work, and the greatest precautions are necessary

to avoid accident. In the light, however, of sufficient experience

there is no difficulty in employing high-tension transformers in the

above-described manner, and in obtaining electromotive forces of

upwards of a hundred thousand volts supplied through transformers

capable of yielding any required amount of current.

On occasions where continuous current alone is available, a motor

generator has to be employed converting the continuous current into an

alternating current. This is best achieved by the employment of a

small alternator directly coupled to a continuous-current motor; or by

providing the shaft of a continuous-current motor with two rings

connected to two opposite portions of its armature, so that when

continuous current is supplied to the brushes pressing against the

commutator, an alternating current can be drawn off from two other

brushes touching the above-mentioned insulated rings.

The next element of importance in the transmitting arrangement is the

spark gap. In the case of those transmitters employing an ordinary

induction coil, the secondary spark, or the discharge of any condenser

connected to the secondary terminals can be taken between the brass

balls about half an inch or one inch in diameter, with which the

terminals of the secondary coil are usually furnished; and it is

generally the custom to allow this spark discharge to take place in

air at ordinary pressure. In the very early days of his work Mr.

Marconi adopted the discharger devised by Professor Rhigi, in which

the spark takes place between two brass balls placed in vaseline or

other highly insulating oil.[17] But whatever advantage may accrue

from using oil as the dielectric in which the spark discharge takes

place, when carrying out simple laboratory experiments on Hertzian

waves, there is no advantage in the case of wireless telegraphy. The

Rhigi discharger was, therefore, soon discarded. If discharges having

large quantity are passed through oil, it is rapidly decomposed or

charred, and ceases to retain the special insulating and

self-restoring character which is necessary in the medium in which an

oscillating spark is formed. The conditions when the discharges of

large condensers are passed between spark balls are entirely different

from those when the quantity of the spark, or to put it in more exact

language, the current passing, is very small. In the case of Hertzian

experiments it is necessary, as shown by Hertz, to maintain a high

state of polish on the spark balls when they are employed for the

production of short waves of small energy, but when we are dealing

with large quantities of energy at each discharge, those methods which

succeed for laboratory experiments are perfectly impracticable. The

conditions necessary to be fulfilled by a discharger for use in

Hertzian wave telegraphy are that the surfaces shall maintain a

constant condition and not be fused or eaten away by the spark, and,

next, that the medium in which the discharge takes place shall not be

decomposed by the passage of the spark, but shall maintain the

property of giving way suddenly when a certain critical pressure is

reached, and passing instantly from a condition in which it is a very

perfect insulator to one in which it is a very good conductor; and,

thirdly, that on the cessation of the discharge, the medium shall

immediately restore itself to its original condition.

When using the ordinary ten-inch induction coil, and when the capacity

charged by it does not exceed a small fraction of a microfarad, it is

quite sufficient to employ brass or steel balls separated by a certain

distance in air, at the ordinary pressure, as the arrangement of the

discharger. When, however, we come to deal with the discharges of very

large condensers, at high electromotive forces, then it is necessary

to have special arrangements to prevent the destruction of the

surfaces between which the spark passes, or their continual

alteration, and many devices have been invented for this purpose. The

author has devised an arrangement which fulfils the above conditions

very perfectly for use in large power stations, but the details of

this cannot be made public at the present time.

* * * * *

We have to consider in connection with this part of the subject the

dielectric strength of air under different pressures and for different

thicknesses. It was shown by Lord Kelvin, in 1860, that the dielectric

strength of very thin layers of air is greater than that of thick

layers.[18] The electric force, reckoned in volts per centimetre,

required to pierce a thickness of air from two to ten millimetres in

thickness, at atmospheric pressure, may be taken at 30,000 volts per

centimetre. The same force in electrostatic units is represented by

the number 100, since a gradient of 300 volts per centimetre

corresponds to a force of one electrostatic unit. It appears also that

for air and other gases there is a certain minimum voltage

(approximately 400 volts) below which no discharge takes place,

however near the conducting surfaces may be approximated. In this

particular practical application, however, we are only concerned with

spark lengths which are measured in millimetres or centimetres, lying,

say, between one or two millimetres and five or six centimetres. Over

this range of spark length we shall not generally be wrong in

reckoning the voltage required to produce a spark between metal balls

in air at the ordinary pressure to be given by the rule:

_Disruptive voltage_ = 3,000 x _spark-gap length in millimetres_.

If, however, the air pressure is increased above the normal by

including the spark balls in a vessel in which air can be compressed,

then the spark length, corresponding to a given potential difference,

very rapidly decreases. Mr. F. J. Jervis-Smith[19] found that by

increasing the air pressure from one atmosphere to two atmospheres

round a pair of spark balls he reduced the spark length given by a

certain voltage from 2.5 to 0.75 centimetre.

Professor R. A. Fessenden has also made some interesting observations

on the effect of using compressed air round spark gaps. He found that

if a certain voltage between metal surfaces would yield a spark four

inches in length, at the ordinary pressure of the air, if the spark

balls were enclosed in a cylinder, the air round them compressed at

50lb. per square inch, the spark length for the same potential

difference of the balls was only one quarter of an inch, or

one-sixteenth of its former value.

The writer has also made experiments with an apparatus designed to

study the effect of compressed air round the spark gap. The

experimental arrangements are as follows: A ten-inch induction coil

has one of its terminals connected to the internal coating of a

battery of Leyden jars. The external coating is connected through the

primary coil of an oscillation transformer with the other secondary

terminal of the coil, and these secondary terminals are also connected

to a spark gap consisting of two brass balls enclosed in a glass

vessel into which air can be forced by a pump, the air pressure being

measured by a gauge. The balls in the glass vessel are set at a

distance of about three millimetres apart. The secondary circuit of

the oscillation transformer is connected to another pair of spark

balls, the distance of which can be varied.

Suppose we begin with the air in the glass vessel containing the balls

connected to the secondary terminals of the induction coil, which may

be called the secondary balls, at atmospheric pressure, and create

oscillatory discharges in the primary coil of the oscillation

transformer, we have a spark between the balls, which may be called

the tertiary balls, connected to the secondary terminals of the

oscillation transformer. If the secondary balls are placed, say, three

millimetres apart, the air in the glass vessel enclosing them being at

the ordinary atmospheric pressure, then with one particular

arrangement of jars used, a spark twenty-five or twenty-six

millimetres long between the tertiary balls will take place. Suppose,

then, we increase the pressure of the air round the secondary balls,

pumping it by degrees to 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50lb. per square inch

above the atmospheric pressure. We find that the spark between the

tertiary balls will gradually leap a greater and greater distance, and

when the pressure of the air is 50lb. per square inch, we can obtain a

fifty-millimetre spark between the tertiary balls, whereas when the

air in the glass vessel is at atmospheric pressure, we can only obtain

a spark between the tertiary balls of half that length.

This experiment demonstrates that the effect of compressing the air

round the secondary terminals of the induction coil is to greatly

increase the difference of potential between these balls before the

spark passes. In fact, it requires about double the voltage to force a

spark of the same length through air compressed at 50lb. on the square

inch that it does to make a spark of identical length between the same

balls in air at normal pressure. This shows that there is a very great

advantage in taking the discharge spark in compressed air. A better

effect can be produced by substituting dry gaseous hydrochloric acid

for air at ordinary pressures.

One other incidental advantage is that the noise of the spark is very

much reduced. The continual crackle, of the discharge spark of the

induction coil in connection with wireless telegraphy is very annoying

to sensitive ears, but in this manner we can render it perfectly

silent.

Professor Fessenden also states that when the spark balls are

surrounded by compressed air, and if one of the balls is connected

with a radiator, the compression of the air, although it shortens the

spark-gap corresponding to a given voltage, does not in any way

increase the radiation. When, however, the air in the spark-ball

vessel is compressed to 60lb. in the square inch, there is a marked

increase in the effective radiation, and at 80lb. per square inch the

energy emitted in the form of waves is nearly three and a-half times

greater than at 50lb., the potential difference between the balls

remaining the same.

This effect is no doubt connected with the fact that the production of

a wave, whether in ether or in any other material, is not so much

dependent upon the absolute force applied as upon the suddenness of

its application. To translate it into the language of the electronic

theory, we may say that the electron radiates only whilst it is being

accelerated, and that its radiating power, therefore, depends not so

much upon its motion as upon the rate at which its motion is changing.

The advantage in using compressed air round the spark gap is that we

can increase the effective potential difference between the balls

without rendering the spark non-oscillatory. In air of the ordinary

pressure there is a certain well-defined limit of spark length for

each voltage, beyond which the discharge becomes non-oscillatory, but

by the employment of spark balls in compressed air, we can increase

the potential difference between the balls corresponding to a given

distance apart before a discharge takes place, or employ higher

potentials with the same length of spark gap. In addition to this, we

have, perhaps, the production of a more effective radiation, as

asserted by Fessenden, when the air pressure exceeds a certain

critical value.

The next element which we have to consider in the transmitting

arrangements is a condenser of some kind for storing the energy which

is radiated at intervals. Where a condenser other than the aerial is

employed for storing the electric energy which is to be radiated by

the aerial, some form of it must be constructed which will withstand

high potentials. As the dielectric for such a condenser, only two

materials seem to be of any practical use, viz., glass and micanite.

Glass condensers in the form of Leyden jars have been extensively

employed, but they have the disadvantage that they are very bulky in

proportion to their electrical capacity. The instrument maker's quart

Leyden jar has a capacity of about one-five hundredth of a microfarad,

but it occupies about 150 cubic inches or more. Professor Braun has

employed in his transmitting arrangements condensers consisting of

small glass tubes like test tubes, lined on the inside and outside

with tinfoil, which are more economical in space. The author has found

that condensers for this purpose are best made of sheet glass about

one-eighth or one-tenth of an inch in thickness, coated to within one

inch of their edge on both sides with tinfoil, and arranged in a

vessel containing resin or linseed oil, like the plates of a storage

battery. M. d'Arsonval has employed micanite, but although this

material has a considerably higher dielectric strength than glass, it

is much more expensive to obtain a given capacity by means of micanite

than by glass, although the bulk of the condenser for a given capacity

is less.

To store up a certain amount of electric energy in a condenser, we

require a certain definite volume of dielectric, no matter how we may

arrange it, and the volume required per unit of energy is determined

by the dielectric strength of the material. Thus, for instance,

ordinary sheet glass cannot be safely employed with a greater electric

force than is represented by 20,000 volts for one-tenth of an inch in

thickness, or, say, a potential gradient of 160,000 volts per

centimetre. This is equivalent to an electric force of about 500

electrostatic units. This may be called the safe-working force. The

electrostatic capacity of a condenser formed of two metal surfaces a

foot square separated by glass three millimetres in thickness is

between 1/360 and 1/400 of a microfarad. If this condenser is charged

to 20,000 volts, we have stored up in it half a joule of electric

energy, and the volume of the dielectric is 270 cubic centimetres.

Hence, to store up in a glass condenser electric energy represented by

one joule at a pressure of 20,000 volts, we require 500 cubic

centimetres of glass, and it will be found that if we double the

pressure and double the thickness of the glass, we still require the

same volume.[20] Hence, in the construction of high-tension condensers

to store up a given amount of energy, the economical problem is how to

obtain the greatest energy-storing capacity for the least money.

Glass fulfils this condition better than any other material. Although

some materials may have very high dielectric strength, such as paper

saturated with various oils, or resins, yet they cannot be used for

the purpose of making condensers to yield oscillatory discharges,

because the oscillations are damped out of existence too soon by the

dielectric.

In arranging condensers to attain a given capacity, regard has to be

taken of the fact that for a given potential difference there must be

a certain total thickness of dielectric, and that if condensers of

equal size are being arranged in parallel it adds to their capacity,

whilst joining them in series divides their capacity. If N equal

condensers or Leyden jars have each a capacity represented by C, and

if they are joined _n_ in series and _m_ in parallel, the joint

capacity of the whole number is _m_C/_n_, where the product _mn_ = N.

Passing on next to the consideration of oscillation transformers of

various kinds--these are appliances of the nature of induction coils

for transforming the current or electromotive force of electrical

oscillations in a required ratio. These coils are, however, destitute

of any iron core, and they generally consist of coils of wire wound on

a fibre, wooden or ebonite frame, and must be immersed in a vat of oil

to preserve the necessary insulation. No dry insulation of the nature

of indiarubber or gutta-percha will withstand the high pressures that

are brought to bear upon the circuits of an oscillation transformer.

In constructing these transformers we have to set aside all previous

notions gathered from the design of low-frequency iron-core

transformers. The chief difficulty we have to contend against in the

construction of an effective oscillation transformer is the inductance

of the primary circuit and the magnetic leakage that takes place. In

other words, the failure of the whole of the flux generated by the

primary circuit to pass through or be linked with the secondary

circuit. Mr. Marconi has employed an excellent form of oscillation

transformer, in the design of which he was guided by a large amount of

experience. In this transformer the two circuits are wound round a

square wooden frame. The primary circuit consists of a number of

strands of thick insulated cable laid on in parallel, so that it

consists of only one turn of a stranded conductor. The secondary

circuit consists of a number of turns, say, ten to twenty, of thinner

insulated wire laid over the primary circuit and close to it, so that

the transformer has the transformation ratio of one to ten or one to

twenty. In the arrangements devised and patented by Mr. Marconi, these

two circuits, with their respective capacities in series with them,

are tuned to one another, so that the time-period of each circuit is

exactly the same, and without this tuning the device becomes

ineffective as a transformer.[21] There is no advantage in putting a

number of turns on the primary circuit, because such multiplication

simply increases the inductance, and, therefore, diminishes the

primary current in the same ratio which it multiplies the turns, and

hence the magnetic field due to the primary circuit remains the same.

Where it is desired to put a number of turns upon a coil, and yet at

the same time keep the inductance down, the writer has adopted the

device of winding a silk or hemp rope well paraffined between the

turns of the circuit, so as to keep them further apart from one

another, and as the inductance depends on the turns per centimetre,

this has the effect of reducing the inductance.

The next and most important element in any transmitting station is the

aerial or radiator, and it was the introduction of this element by Mr.

Marconi which laid the foundation for Hertzian wave telegraphy as

opposed to mere experiments with the Hertzian waves. We may consider

the different varieties of aerial which have been evolved from the

fundamental idea. The simple single Marconi aerial consists of a bare

or insulated wire, generally about 100ft. or 150ft. in length,

suspended from a sprit attached to a tall mast. As these masts have

generally to be erected in exposed positions, considerable care has to

be taken in erecting them with a large margin of strength. To the end

of a sprit is attached an insulator of some kind, which may be a

simple ebonite rod, or sometimes a more elaborate arrangement of oil

insulators, and to the lower end of this insulator is attached the

aerial wire. As at the top of the aerial we have to deal with

potentials capable sometimes of giving sparks several feet in length,

the insulation of the upper end of the aerial is an important matter.

In the original Marconi system, the lower end of the aerial was simply

attached to one spark ball connected to one terminal of the induction

coil, and the other terminal and spark ball were connected to the

earth. In this arrangement, the aerial acted not only as radiator, but

as energy-storing capacity, and as already explained, its radiating

power was on that account limited. The earth connection is an

important matter. For long distance work, a good earth is essential.

This earth must be made by embedding a metal plate in the soil, and

many persons are under the impression that the efficiency of the earth

plate depends upon its area, but this is not the fact. It depends much

more upon its shape, and principally upon the amount of its "edge." It

has been shown by Professor A. Tanakadate, of Japan, that if a metal

plate of negligible resistance is embedded in an infinite medium

having a resistivity _r_, the electrical conductance of this plate is

equal to 4pi/_r_ times the electrostatic capacity of the same plate

placed in a dielectric of infinite extent. Hence in designing an

earth plate, we have to consider not how to give it the utmost amount

of surface, but how to give it the greatest electrostatic capacity,

and for this purpose it is far better to divide a given amount of

metal into long strips radiating out in different directions, rather

than to employ it in the form of one big square or circular plate. The

importance of the "good earth" will have been seen from our discussion

on the mode of formation of electric waves. There must be a perfectly

free access for the electrons to pass into and out of the aerial.

Hence, if the soil is dry, or badly conductive in the neighbourhood,

we have to go down to a level at which we get a good moist earth. In

fact, the precautions which have to be taken in making a good earth

for Hertzian wave telegraphy are exactly those which should be taken

in making a good earth for a lightning conductor.

Whilst on the subject of aerials, a word may be said on the

localisation of wireless telegraph stations on the Marconi system. For

reasons which were explained previously, the transmission of signals

is effected more easily over water than over dry land, and it is

hindered if the soil in the neighbourhood of the sending station is a

poor conductor. Hence, all active Hertzian wave telegraph stations,

like all active volcanoes, are generally found near the sea. In those

cases in which a multiple aerial has to be put up consisting of many

wires, one mast may be insufficient to support the structure, and

several masts arranged in the form of a square or a circle have to be

employed. The illustrated papers have reproduced numerous pictures of

the Marconi power stations at Poldhu in Cornwall, Glace Bay in Nova

Scotia, and Cape Cod in the United States. In these stations, after

preliminary failures to obtain the necessary structural strength with

ordinary masts, tall lattice girder wooden towers have been built,

about 215 feet in height, well stayed against wind pressure, and which

so far have proved themselves capable of withstanding any storm of

wind which has come against them.

An important question in connection with the sending power of an

aerial is that of the relation of its height to the distance covered.

Some time ago Mr. Marconi enunciated a law, as the result of his

experiments, connecting these two quantities, which may be called

Marconi's Law. He stated that the height of the aerial to cover a

given distance, other things remaining the same, varies as the square

root of the distance. Let D be the distance and let L be the length of

the aerial, then if both the transmitting and receiving aerial are the

same height, we may say that D varies as L^{2}. This relation may be

theoretically deduced as follows:--Any given receiving apparatus for

Hertzian wave telegraphy requires a certain minimum energy to be

imparted to it to make it yield a signal. If the resistance and the

capacity of the receiver is taken as constant, this minimum working

energy is proportional to the square of the electromotive force set up

in the receiving aerial by the impact on it of the electric waves.

This electromotive force varies as the length of the receiving aerial

and as the magnetic force due to the wave cutting across it, and the

magnetic force varies as the current in the transmitting aerial, and

therefore, for any given voltage varies as the capacity, and therefore

as the length of the transmitting aerial. If, therefore, the

transmitting and receiving aerial have the same length, the minimum

energy varies as the square of the electromotive force in the

receiving aerial, and therefore as the fourth power of the length of

either aerial, since the electromotive force varies as the product of

the lengths of the aerials. Hence, when the distance between the

aerials is constant, the minimum working energy varies as the fourth

power of the height of either aerial, but when the lengths of the

aerials are constant, the energy caught up by the receiving aerial

must vary inversely as the square of the distance D between the

aerials. Hence, if we call _e_ this minimum working energy, _e_ must

vary as 1/D^{2} when L is constant, or as L^4 when D is constant, and

since _e_ is a constant quantity for any given arrangements of

receiver and transmitter, it follows that when the height of aerial

and distance vary, the ratio L^4/D^2 is constant, or, in other words,

D^2 varies as L^4 or D varies as L^2--_i.e._, distance varies as the

square of the height of the aerial, which is Marconi's Law. The curve,

therefore, connecting height of aerial with sending distance for given

arrangements is a portion of a parabola.

Otherwise, the law may be stated in the form L = _a_[\sq]{D}, where _a_

is a numerical coefficient. If L and D are both measured in metres,

then, for recent Marconi apparatus as used on ships, _a_ = 0.15 roughly.

(See a report on experiments made for the Italian Navy, 1900-1901, by

Captain Quintino Bonomo--"Telegrafia senza fili," Rome, 1902.)

This law, however, must not be used without discretion. After Mr.

Marconi had transmitted signals across the British Channel, some

people, forgetting that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing,

predicted that aerials a thousand feet in height would be required to

signal across the Atlantic, but Mr. Marconi has made such improvements

of late years in the receiving arrangements that he has been able to

receive signals over three thousand miles in 1903 with aerials only

thirty-three per cent. longer than those which, in 1899, he employed

to cover twenty miles across the English Channel.

[Illustration: FIG. 15.--ALTERNATING-CURRENT DOUBLE-TRANSFORMATION

POWER PLANT FOR GENERATING ELECTRIC WAVES (Fleming). _a_, alternator;

H_{1}H_{2}, choking coil; K, signalling key; T, step-up transformer;

S_{1}S_{2} spark-gap; C_{1}C_{2} condensers; T_{1}T_{2}, oscillation

transformers; A, aerial; E, earthplate.]

We turn, in the next place, to the consideration of those devices for

putting more power into the aerial than can be achieved when the

aerial itself is simply employed as the reservoir of energy. Professor

Braun, of Strassburg, in 1899, described a method for doing this by

inducing oscillations in the aerial by means of an oscillation

transformer, these oscillations being set up by the discharges from a

Leyden jar or battery of Leyden jars, which formed the reservoir of

energy. The induction coil is employed to produce a rapidly

intermittent series of electrical oscillations in the primary coil of

an oscillation transformer by the discharge through it of a Leyden

jar. Mr. Marconi immensely improved this arrangement, as described by

him in a lecture given before the Society of Arts on May 17, 1901, by

syntonising the two circuits and making the circuit, consisting of the

capacity of the aerial and the inductance of the secondary circuit of

the oscillation transformer, have the same time-period as the circuit

consisting of the Leyden jars, or energy-storing condenser, and the

primary circuit of the oscillation transformer, and by so doing

immensely added to the power and range of the apparatus.

Starting from these inventions of Braun and Marconi, the author

devised a double transmission system in which the oscillations are

twice transformed before being generated in the aerial, each time with

a multiplication of electromotive force and a multiplication of the

number of groups of oscillations per second. This arrangement can best

be understood from the diagram (see Fig. 15).

In this case a transformer, T, or transformers receive alternating

low-frequency current from an alternator, _a_, being regulated by

passing through two variable choking coils, H_{1} and H_{2}, so as to

control it. This alternating current is transformed up from a

potential of two thousand to twenty, forty or a hundred thousand, and

is employed to charge a large condenser, C_{1}, which discharges

across a primary spark-gap, S_{1}, through the primary coil of an

oscillation transformer, T_{1}. The secondary circuit of the

oscillation transformer is connected to a second pair of spark balls,

S_{2}, which in turn are connected by a secondary condenser, C_{2},

and the primary circuit of a third transformer, T_{2} and the

secondary circuit of this last transformer are inserted between a

Marconi aerial, A, and the earth E. When all these circuits are tuned

to resonance by Mr. Marconi's methods, we have an enormously powerful

arrangement for creating electric waves, or rather trains of electric

waves, sent out from the aerial, and the oscillations are controlled

and the signals made by short-circuiting one of the choking coils.

Another transmitting arrangement, which involves a slightly different

principle, and employs no oscillation transformer, is one due also to

Professor Braun. In this case, a condenser and inductance are connected

in series to the spark balls of an induction coil, and oscillations are

set up in this circuit. Accordingly, there are rapid fluctuations of

potential at one terminal of the condenser. If to this we connect a long

aerial, the length of which has been adjusted to be one quarter of the

length of wave corresponding to the frequency, in other words, to make

it a quarter-wave resonator, then powerful oscillations will be

accumulated in this rod. The relation between the height (H) of the

aerial and the frequency is given by the equation 3 x 10^{10} = 4_n_H,

where _n_ is the frequency of the oscillations and H the height of the

aerial in centimetres. The frequency of the oscillations is determined

by the capacity (C) and inductance (L) of the condenser circuit, and can

be calculated from the formula

n = (5,000,000) / ([\sq]{C (in mfds.) x L (in cms.)}).

That is, the frequency is obtained by dividing into the number

5,000,000, the square root of the product of the capacity in

microfarads, and inductance in centimetres, of the condenser circuit.

It will be found, on applying these rules, that it is impossible to

unite together any aerial of a length obtainable in practice with a

condenser circuit of more than a very moderate capacity. It has been

shown that for an aerial two hundred feet in height the corresponding

resonating frequency is about one and a quarter million.[22] As we are

limited in the amount to which we can reduce the inductance of a

discharge circuit, probably to something like a thousand centimetres,

a simple calculation shows that the largest capacity we can employ is

about a sixtieth of a microfarad. This capacity, even if charged at

60,000 volts, would only contain thirty joules of energy, or about

22.5 foot-pounds, which is a small storage compared to that which can

be achieved when we are employing the above-described methods, which

involve the use of an oscillation transformer. In such a case,

however, it is an advantage to employ a spark-gap in compressed air,

because we can then raise the voltage to a much higher value than in

air of ordinary pressure without lengthening the spark so much as to

render it non-oscillatory.

When employing methods involving the use of an oscillation

transformer, it is possible to use multiple aerials having large

capacity, and hence to store up a very large amount of energy in the

aerial, which is liberated at each discharge. The most effective

arrangement is one in which the radiator draws off gradually a large

supply of energy from a non-radiating circuit, and so sends out a true

train of waves, and not mere impulses, into the ether, and as we shall

see later on, it is only when the radiation takes place in the form of

true wave trains that anything like syntony can be obtained.

There are a number of variants of the above methods of arranging the

radiator and associated energy-storing in circuit. Descriptions of

these arrangements will be found in patents by Mr. Marconi, Professor

Slaby and Count von Arco, Sir Oliver Lodge, Dr. Muirhead, Professor

Popoff, Professor Fessenden and others. In all cases, however, they

are variations of the three simple forms of radiator already

described.

Returning to the analogy with the air or steam siren suggested at the

commencement of this article, the reader will see in the light of the

explanations already given, that all parts of the air-wave producing

apparatus have their analogues in the electrical radiator as used in

Hertzian wave telegraphy. The object in the one case is to produce

rapid oscillations of air particles in a tube, which result in the

production of an air wave in external space; in the other case, the

arrangement serves to produce oscillations of electrons or electrical

particles in a wire, the movements of which create a disturbance in

the ether called an electrical wave. Comparing together, item by item,

it will be seen, therefore, that the induction coil or transformer

used in connection with electric-wave apparatus is analogous to the

air pump in the siren plant. In the electrical apparatus, this

electron pump is employed to put an electrical charge into a

condenser; in the air wave apparatus, the air pump is employed to

charge an air vessel with high pressure air. From the electrical

condenser the charge is released in the form of a series of electrical

oscillations, and in the air wave producing appliance, the compressed

air is released in the form of a series of intermittent puffs or

blasts. In the electrical wave producing apparatus, these electrical

oscillations in the condenser circuit are finally made to produce

other oscillations in an air wire or open circuit, just as the puffs

of air finally expend themselves in producing aerial oscillations in

the siren tube. Finally, in the one case we have a series of air waves

and in the other case, a series of electrical waves. These trains of

electric waves or air waves, as the case may be, are intermitted into

long and short groups, in accordance with the signals of the Morse

alphabet, and, therefore, the Hertzian wave transmitter, in whatever

form it may be employed, when operated by means of a Marconi aerial,

is in fact an electrical siren apparatus, the function of which is to

create periodic disturbances in the universal ether of the same

character as those which the siren produces in atmospheric air.

* * * * *

We have to consider in the next place the arrangements of the

receiving station and the various forms of receivers that have been

devised for effecting telegraphy by Hertzian waves. Just as the

transmitting station consists essentially of two parts, viz., a part

for creating electrical oscillations and a part for throwing out or

radiating electric waves, so the receiving-station appliances may be

divided into two portions; the function of one being to catch up a

portion of the energy of the passing wave, and that of the other to

make a record or intelligible signal in some manner in the form of an

audible or visible sign.

Accordingly, there must be at the receiving station an arrangement

called a receiving aerial, which in general takes the form of a long

vertical wire or wires, similar in form to the transmitting aerial,

There is, however, a distinct difference in the function of the

transmitting aerial and the receiving aerial. The function of the

first is effective radiation, and for this purpose the aerial must

have associated with it a store of energy to be released as wave

energy; but the function of the receiving aerial is to be the seat of

an electromotive force which is created by the electric force and the

magnetic force of the incident electric wave.

In tracing out the mode of operation of the transmitting aerial, it

was pointed out that the electric waves emitted consisted of

alternations of electric force in a direction which is perpendicular

to the surface of the earth, and magnetic force parallel to the

surface of the earth. These two quantities, the electric force and the

magnetic force, are called the _wave vectors_, and they both lie in a

plane perpendicular to the direction in which the wave is travelling

and at right angles to one another, the electric force being

perpendicular to the surface of the earth. In optical language, the

wave sent out by the aerial would be called a plane polarised wave,

the plane of polarisation being parallel to the magnetic force. Hence,

if at any point in the path of the wave we erect a vertical conductor,

as the wave passes over it, it is cut transversely by the magnetic

force of the wave and longitudinally by the electric force. Both of

these operations result in the creation of an alternating

electromotive force in the receiving aerial wire.

As in all other cases of oscillatory motion, the principle of

resonance may here be brought into play to increase immensely the

amplitude of the current oscillations thereby set up in the receiving

aerial. As already explained, any vertical insulated wire placed with

its lower end near the earth has capacity with respect to the earth,

and it has also inductance, the value of these factors depending on

its shape and height. Accordingly, it has a natural electrical

time-period of its own, and if the periodic electromotive impulses

which are set up in it by the passage of the waves over it agree in

period with its own natural time-period, then the amplitude of the

current vibrations in it may become enormously greater than when there

is a disagreement between these two periods. Before concluding these

articles we shall return to this subject of electric resonance and

syntony, and discuss it with reference to what is called the tuning of

Hertzian wave stations. Meanwhile, it may be said that for the sake of

obtaining, at any rate in an approximate degree, this coincidence of

time-period, it is generally usual to make the receiving aerial as far

as possible identical with the transmitting aerial. If the receiving

aerial is not insulated, but is connected to the earth at its lower

end through the primary coil of an oscillation transformer, we can

still set up in it electrical oscillations by the impact on it of an

electric wave of proper period; and if the oscillation transformer is

properly constructed we can draw from its secondary circuit electric

oscillations in a similar period.

One problem in connection with the design of a receiving aerial is

that of increasing its effective length and capacity so as to increase

correspondingly the electromotive force or current oscillations in it.

It is clear that if we put a number of receiving wires in parallel so

that each one of them is operated upon by the wave separately,

although we can increase in this way the magnitude of the alternating

current which can be drawn off from the aerial, we cannot increase the

electromotive force in it except by increasing the actual height of

the wires. Unfortunately, there is a limit to the height of the

receiving aerial. It has to be suspended, like the transmitting

aerial, from a mast or tower, and the engineering problem of

constructing such a permanent supporting structure higher than, say,

two hundred feet is a difficult one.

Since any one station has to send as well as receive, it is usual to

make one and the same aerial wire or wires do double duty. It is

switched over from the transmitting to the receiving apparatus, as

required. This, however, is a concession to convenience and cost. In

some respects it would be better to have two separate aerials at each

station, the one of the best form for sending, and the other of the

best form for receiving.

In Mr. Marconi's early arrangements, the so-called coherer or

sensitive wave-detecting appliance, to be described more in detail

presently, was inserted between the base of the insulated receiving

aerial and the earth, but it was subsequently found by him to be a

great improvement to act upon the receiving device, not directly by

the electromotive force set up in the aerial, but by the induced

electromotive force of a special form of step-up oscillation

transformer he calls a "jigger," the primary circuit of which was

inserted in between the receiving aerial and the earth plate, and the

secondary circuit was connected to the sensitive organ of the

telegraphic receiving arrangements.[23] A suggestion to employ

transformed oscillations in affecting a coherer, had also been

described in a patent specification by Sir Oliver Lodge, in 1897, but

the essence of success in the use of this device is not merely the

employment of a transformer, but of a transformer constructed

specially to transform electrical oscillations.

Turning, then, to the consideration of the relation existing between

the transmitting and receiving aerials, we note that in their simplest

form these consist of two similar tall rods of metal placed upright,

with their feet in good connection with the earth at two places. We

may think of them as two identical lightning conductors, well earthed

at the bottom, and supported by non-conducting masts or towers. These

rods must be in good connection with the earth, and therefore with it

form, as it were, one conductor. If, as usual, these aerials are

separated by the sea, the intermediate portion of this circuit is an

electrolyte. The operations which take place when a signal is sent are

as follows:--

At the transmitting station, we set up in the transmitting aerial

electric oscillations, of which the frequency may be of the order of a

million, _i.e._, the oscillations as long as they last are at the rate

of a million a second. Each spark discharge at the transmitter

results, however, only in the production of a train of a dozen or two

oscillations, and these trains succeed each other at a rate depending

upon the transmitting arrangements used. Each oscillation in the

transmitting aerial is accompanied by the detachment from it of

semi-loops of electric strain, as already explained. The alterations

of electric strain directed perpendicularly to the earth, and of the

associated magnetic force parallel to the earth, constitute an

electric wave in the ether, just as the alternations of pressure and

motion of air molecules constitute an air wave. Associated with these

physical actions above ground, there is a propagation through the

earth of electric action, which may consist in a motion or atomic

exchange of electrons. Each change or movement of a semi-loop of

electric strain above ground has its equivalent below ground in

inter-atomic exchanges or movements of the electrons, on which the

ends of these semi-loops of electric strain terminate. The earth must

play, therefore, a very important part in so-called "wireless

telegraphy," and we might also say the earth does as much as the ether

in its production.

The function of the receiving aerial is to bring about a union between

these two operations above and below ground. When the electric waves

fall upon it, they give rise to electromotive force in the receiving

aerial, and, therefore, produce oscillations in it which, in fact,

are electric currents flowing into and out of the receiving aerial. We

may say that the transmitting aerial, the receiving aerial and the

earth form one gigantic Hertz oscillator. In one part of this system,

electric oscillations of a certain period are set up by the discharge

of a condenser and are propagated to the other part. In the earth,

there is a propagation of electric oscillations; in the space above

and between the aerials, there is a propagation of electric waves. The

receiving aerial _feels_, therefore, what is happening at the distant

aerial and can be made to record it.[24]

We have next to consider the question of the wave-detecting devices

which enable us to appreciate and record the impact of a wave or wave

train against the aerial. At the very outset it will be necessary to

coin a new word to apply generally to these appliances. Most readers

are probably familiar with the term "coherer," which was applied by

Sir Oliver Lodge, in the first instance, to an electric wave-detecting

device of one particular kind--viz., that in which a metal point was

lightly pressed against another metal surface and caused to stick to

it when an electric wave fell upon it. As our knowledge increased, it

was found that there were many cases in which the effect of the

electric radiation was to cause a severance and not a coherence, and

hence such clumsy phrases as "anticoherer" and "self-decohering

coherer" have come into use. Moreover, we have now many kinds of

electric wave detectors based on quite different physical principles.

At the risk of incurring reprobation for adding to scientific

nomenclature, the author ventures to think that the time has arrived

when a simple and inclusive term will be found useful to describe all

the devices, whatever their nature, which are employed for detecting

the presence of an electric wave. For this purpose the term

_kumascope_, from the Greek [Greek: kuma] (a wave), is suggested. The

scientific study of waves has already been called _kumatology_, and in

view of our familiarity with such terms as _microscope_,

_electroscope_ and _hygroscope_, there does not seem to be any

objection to enlarging our vocabulary by calling a wave-detecting

appliance a _kumascope_. We are then able to look at the subject

broadly and to classify kumascopes of different kinds.

We may, in the first place, arrange them according to the principle on

which they act. Thus, we may have electric, magnetic, thermal,

chemical and physiological operations involved; and finally, we may

divide them into those which are self-restoring, in the sense that

after the passage or action of a wave upon them they return to their

original sensitive condition; and those which are non-restoring, in

that they must be subjected to some treatment to bring them back again

to a condition in which they are fit to respond again to the action of

a wave.

We have no space to refer to the whole of the steps of discovery which

led up to the invention of all the various forms of the modern

electric kumascope or wave detector. Suffice it to say that the

researches of Hertz in 1887 threw a flood of light upon many

previously obscure phenomena, and enabled us to see that an electric

spark, and especially an oscillatory spark, creates a disturbance in

the ether, which has a resemblance in Nature to the expanding ripples

produced by a stone hurled into water. Scientific investigation then

returned with fresh interest to previously incomprehensible effects,

and a new meaning was read into many old observations. Again and again

it had been noticed that loose metallic contacts, loose aggregations

of metallic filings or fragments, had a mysterious way of altering

their conductivity under the action of electric sparks, lightning

discharges and high electromotive forces.

As far back as 1852, Mr. Varley had noticed that masses of powdered

metals had a very small conductivity, which increased in a remarkable

way during thunderstorms;[25] and in 1866, C. and S. A. Varley

patented a device for protecting telegraphic instruments from

lightning, which consisted of a small box of powdered carbon in which

were buried two nearly touching metal points, and they stated that

"powdered conducting matter offers a great resistance to a current of

moderate tension, but offers but little resistance to currents of high

tension."[26]

We then pass over a long interval and find that the next published

account of similar observations was due to Professor T.

Calzecchi-Onesti, who described in an Italian journal, _Il Nuovo

Cimento_ (see Vol. XVI., p. 58, and Vol. XVII., p. 38), in 1884 and

1885 his observations on the decrease in resistance of metal powders

when the spark from an induction coil was sent through them.[27] These

observations did not attract much attention until Professor E. Branly,

of Paris, in 1890 and 1891, repeated them on an extended scale and

with great variations, making the important observation that an

electric spark _at a distance_ had a similar effect in increasing the

conductivity of metallic powders.[28] Branly, however, noticed that in

some cases of conductors in powder, such as the peroxide of lead or

antimony, the effect of the spark was to cause a decrease of

conductivity.

To Professor E. Branly unquestionably belongs the honour of giving to

science a new weapon in the shape of a tube containing metallic

filings or powder rather loosely packed between metal plugs, and of

showing that when the pressure on the powder was adjusted such a tube

may be a conductor of very high resistance, but that the electrical

conductivity is enormously increased if an electric spark is made in

its neighbourhood. He also proved that the same effect occurred in the

case of two slightly oxidised steel or copper wires laid across one

another with light pressure, and that this loose or imperfect contact

was extraordinarily sensitive to an electric spark, dropping in

resistance from thousands of ohms to a few ohms when a spark was made

many yards away.

It is curious to notice how long some important researches take to

become generally known. Branly's work did not attract much attention

in England until 1892, when Dr. Dawson Turner described his own

repetition of Branly's experiments with the metallic filings tube at a

meeting of the British Association in Edinburgh. In the discussion

which followed, Professor George Forbes made an important remark. He

asked whether it was possible that the decrease in resistance could be

brought about by Hertz waves.[29]

This question shows that even in 1892 the idea that the effect of the

spark on the Branly tube was really due to Hertzian waves was only

just beginning to arise. The following year, however, Mr. W. B. Croft

repeated Branly's experiment with copper filings before the Physical

Society of London, and entitled his short Paper "Electric Radiation on

Copper Filings."[30] He exhibited a tube containing copper filings

loosely held between two copper plugs and joined in series with a

galvanometer and cell. The effect of an electric spark at a distance,

in causing increase of conductivity, was shown, and the return of the

tube to its non-conducting state when tapped was also noticed.

In the discussion which followed the reading of this Paper, Professor

Minchin described the effects of electric radiation on his impulsion

cells. He followed up this by reading a Paper to the Physical Society

on November 24, 1893, on the action of Hertzian radiation on films

containing metallic powders, and expressed the opinion that the change

in resistance of the Branly tube was due to electric radiation.[31]

Thus, at the end of 1893, a few physicists clearly recognised that a

new means had been given to us for detecting those invisible ether

waves, the chief properties of which Hertz had unravelled with

surpassing skill six years before, by means of a detector consisting

of a ring of wire having a small spark-gap in it.

In June, 1894, Sir Oliver Lodge delivered a discourse at the Royal

Institution, entitled "The Work of Hertz," and at this lecture use was

made of the Branly tube as a Hertz wave detector. The chief object of

the lecture was to describe the properties of Hertzian waves and their

reflection, absorption and transmission, and many brilliant

quasi-optical experiments were exhibited. Although a Branly tube, or

imperfect metallic contact, then named by him a _coherer_, was

employed by Sir Oliver Lodge to detect an electric wave generated in

another room, there was no mention in this lecture of any use of the

instrument for telegraphic purposes.[32]

As we are here concerned only with the applications in telegraphy, we

shall not spend any more time discussing the purely scientific work

done with laboratory forms of this wave detector.

Without attempting to touch the very delicate question as to the

precise point at which laboratory research passed into technical

application, we shall briefly describe the forms of kumascope which

have been devised with special reference to Hertzian wave telegraphic

work. A very exact classification is at present impossible, but we may

say that telegraphic kumascopes may be roughly divided into six

classes. The first class includes all those that depend for their

action on the "coherer principle" or the reduction of the resistance

of a metallic microphone by the action of electromotive force. As they

depend upon an imperfect contact, they may be called _contact

kumascopes_. This class is furthermore subdivided into the

self-restoring and the non-self-restoring varieties. The second class

comprises the _magnetic kumascopes_ which depend upon the action of an

electrical oscillation as a magnetising or demagnetising agency. The

third class comprises the _electrolytic responders_, in which the

action of electric oscillations either promotes or destroys the

results of electrolysis. The fourth class consists of the

_electrothermal detectors_, in which the power of an electrical

oscillation as a high frequency electric current to heat a conductor

is utilised. The fifth class comprises the _electromagnetic_ or

_electro-dynamic_ instruments, which are virtually very sensitive

alternating-current ammeters, adapted for immensely high frequency.

The sixth class must be made to contain all those which cannot be well

fitted at present into any of the others, such as the sensitive

responder of Schaefer, the action of which is not very clearly made

out.

We may proceed briefly to describe the construction of the principal

forms of kumascope coming under the above headings. In the first

place, let us consider those which are commonly called the "coherers"

or, as the writer prefers to call them, the _contact kumascopes_. The

simplest of these is the crossed needle or single contact, which

originated with Professor E. Branly.[33] The pressure of the point of

a steel needle against an aluminium plate was subsequently found by

Sir Oliver Lodge to be a very sensitive arrangement when so adjusted

that a single cell sends little or no current through the contact.[34]

When an electric wave passes over it, good conducting contact ensues.

The point is, in fact, welded to the plate, and can only be detached

by giving the plate or needle a light shock or vibration. A variation

of the above form is a pair of crossed needles, one resting on the

other.

Hertzian Wave Wireless Telegraphy · 第 8 / 10 题