MURDER OF MIANTONOMO.

In a subsequent Indian war, 1643,--brought about, it is said, by

Connecticut, between the Narragansetts and the Mohegans,--Miantonomo, by

some strange accident, fell into the hands of Uncas, who, for fear of

retaliation, instead of taking his life, sent him to Hartford. The

Connecticut people, in their turn, sent him to Boston, to be judged by the

Commissioners of the United Colonies; and these commissioners, "although

they had no jurisdiction in the case, nor any just ground of complaint

against the sachem," came to the conclusion "that Uncas would not be safe

if he were suffered to live." Drake says, "Strange as it may seem, it was

with the advice of the Elders of the Churches" (Winthrop says five of the

most judicious elders) that it was determined Uncas might put Miantonomo

to death,--a piece of barbarism and injustice hardly matched by any

conduct of the Indians. He was taken back to Uncas "with a guard of

English soldiers," and Uncas readily undertook the execution of his

victim. When he arrived at a place appointed, a brother of Uncas "clave

his head with a hatchet." "Thus inhumanly and unjustly perished the

greatest Indian chief of whom any account is found in New England's

annals." Canonicus, it is said, was greatly affected by the death of his

nephew, in whom he always had the utmost confidence, and regarded him with

the fondness of a father. Canonicus died in 1647. After the death of

Miantonomo, the Narragansetts were never on very good terms with the

English, who had suspected them once or twice unjustly. Hutchinson says,

"The Narragansetts are said to have kept to the treaty until the Pequods

were destroyed, and then they grew insolent and treacherous." It certainly

appears that they were not well used by the English settlers, and it is

not surprising that they should grow "insolent and treacherous;" for the

treachery appears to have been first against them.

Curiosities of History: Boston, September Seventeenth, 1630-1880 · 第 33 / 96 题