ORIGIN OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.

(_To the Editor._)

As a general reader of your entertaining miscellany, I take the liberty to

correct a mistake in No. 481, relative to the Origin of the House of

Commons, which is indirectly stated to have _originated from the Battle of

Evesham_. It is true that the earliest instance on record of the

assembling in parliament representatives of the people occurred in the

same year with the battle of Evesham; but it had no connexion whatever

with the event of that engagement, since the parliament (to which for the

first time citizens and burgesses were summoned) was assembled through the

influence of the Earl of Leicester, who then held the king under his

control; and the meeting took place in the beginning of the year 1265, the

writs of summons having been issued in November, 1264; while the battle of

Evesham, in which the Earl of Leicester was killed, did not happen till

August 4, 1265, or between five and six months after the conclusion of the

parliament. From that period to the death of Henry III. in 1272, it does

not appear that any election of citizens or burgesses, to attend

parliament, occurred. The next instance of such elections seems to have

happened in the 18th of Edward I.; and the first returns to such writs of

summons extant are dated the 23rd of the same reign, since which, with a

few intermissions, they have been regularly continued.

The correctness of these statements will appear from a reference to the

4th and 5th chapters of Sir W. Betham's recently published work on

"Dignities Feudal and Parliamentary," or to Sir James Mackintosh's History

of England.

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 17, No. 485, April 16, 1831 · 第 3 / 33 题