HARLOW’S TRIAL OF QUEEN KATHERINE.

This celebrated picture, (known also as “The Kemble Family,” from its

introducing their portraits,) was the last and most esteemed work of J.

H. Harlow, whom Sir Thomas Lawrence generously characterizes as “the

most promising of all our painters.” The painting was commenced and

finished in 1817; immediately after its exhibition at the Royal Academy,

it was finely copied in mezzotint, by G. Clint; and the print in its

time probably enjoyed more popularity than any production of its class.

A proof impression has been known to realize upwards of twenty guineas.

The picture is on mahogany panel, stated to have cost the artist 15_l._;

it is one and a half inch in thickness, and in size about seven feet by

five feet. It originated with Mr. T. Welsh, the professor of music, who,

in the first instance, commissioned Harlow to paint for him a kit-cat

size portrait of Mrs. Siddons, in the character of Queen Katherine, in

Shakspeare’s play of Henry VIII., introducing a few scenic accessories

in the distance. For this portrait Harlow was to receive twenty-five

guineas; but the idea of representing the whole scene occurred to the

artist, who, with Mr. Welsh, prevailed upon most of the actors to sit

for their portraits; in addition to these are portraits of the friends

of both parties, including the artist himself. The sum ultimately paid

by Mr. Welsh for the picture was one hundred guineas; and a like amount

was paid by Mr. Cribb for Harlow’s permission to engrave the well-known

print, to which we have already adverted.

Harlow owed many obligations to Fuseli for his critical remarks on this

picture: when he first saw it, chiefly in dead-colouring, he said: “I do

not disapprove of the general arrangement of your work, and I see you

will give it a powerful effect of light and shadow; but you have here a

composition of more than twenty figures, or, I should rather say, parts

of figures, because you have not shown one leg or foot, which makes it

very defective. Now, if you do not know how to draw legs and feet, I

will show you,” and taking up a crayon, he drew two on the wainscot of

the room. Harlow profited by these instructions, and the next time

Fuseli saw the picture, the whole arrangement in the foreground was

changed. He then said to Harlow, “So far you have done well; but now you

have not introduced a back figure, to throw the eye of the spectator

into the picture;” and then pointed out by what means he might improve

it in this particular. Accordingly, Harlow introduced the two boys who

are taking up the cushion.

It has been stated that the majority of the actors in the scene sat for

their portraits in this picture. John Kemble, however, refused when

asked to do so by Mr. Welsh, strengthening his refusal with emphasis

profane. Harlow was not, however, to be defeated; and he actually drew

Kemble’s portrait in one of the stage-boxes of Covent Garden Theatre,

while the great actor was playing his part. The vexation such a _ruse_

must have occasioned to a man of Kemble’s temperament may be imagined.

Egerton, Pope, and Stephen Kemble were successively painted for Henry

VIII., the artist retaining the latter. The head or Charles Kemble was

likewise twice painted; the first, which cost him many sittings, was

considered by himself and others to be very successful. The artist

thought otherwise; and, contrary to Mr. Kemble’s wish and remonstrance,

he one morning painted out the approved head: in a day or two, however,

entirely from memory, Harlow repainted the portrait with increased

fidelity. It is stated that but one sitting was required of Mrs.

Siddons: the fact is, the great actress held her uplifted arm frequently

till she could hold it raised no longer, and the majestic limb was

finished from another original.

Anecdotes about Authors, and Artists · 第 235 / 323 题