CHAPTER XXIII

_ISRAEL'S FALL OVERRULED, FOR THE WORLD'S BLESSING, AND FOR ISRAEL'S

MERCY_

ROMANS xi. 11-24

The Apostle has been led a few steps backwards in the last previous

verses. His face has been turned once more toward the dark region of

the prophetic sky, to see how the sin of Christ-rejecting souls is met

and punished by the dreadful "_gift_" of slumber, and apathy, and the

transmutation of blessings to snares. But now, decisively, he looks

sunward. He points our eyes, with his own, to the morning light of

grace and promise. We are to see what Israel's fall has had to do with

the world's hope and with life in Christ, and then what blessings

await Israel himself, and again the world through him.

[Sidenote: Ver. 11.] =I say, therefore,= (the phrase resumes the point

of view to which the same words above (ver. 1) led us,) =did they

stumble that they might fall?= Did their national rejection of an

unwelcome because unworldly Messiah take place, in the divine

permission, with the positive divine purpose that it should bring on a

final rejection of the nation, its banishment out of its place in the

history of redemption? =Away with the thought! But their partial

fall[189] is the occasion of God's salvation (ἡ σωτηρία) for the

Gentiles, with a view to move them,= the Jews, =to jealousy,= to awake

them to a sight of what Christ is, and of what their privilege in Him

might yet be, by the sight of His work and glory in once pagan lives.

Observe here the divine benignity which lurks even under the edges of

the cloud of judgment. And observe too, thus close to the passage

which has put before us the mysterious side of divine action on human

wills, the daylight simplicity of _this_ side of that action; the

loving skill with which the world's blessing is meant by the God of

grace to act, exactly in the line of human feeling, upon the will of

Israel.

But would that "the Gentiles" had borne more in heart that last short

sentence of St Paul's, through these long centuries since the Apostles

fell asleep! It is one of the most marked, as it is one of the

saddest, phenomena in the history of the Church that for ages, almost

from the days of St John himself, we look in vain either for any

appreciable Jewish element in Christendom, or for any extended effort

on the part of Christendom to win Jewish hearts to Christ by a wise

and loving evangelization. With only relatively insignificant

exceptions this was the abiding state of things till well within the

eighteenth century, when the German Pietists began to call the

attention of believing Christians to the spiritual needs and prophetic

hopes of Israel, and to remind them that the Jews were not only a

beacon of judgment, or only the most impressive and awful illustration

of the fulfilment of prophecy, but the bearers of yet unfulfilled

predictions of mercy for themselves and for the world. Meanwhile, all

through the Middle Age, and through generations of preceding and

following time also, Christendom did little for Israel but retaliate,

reproach, and tyrannize. It was so of old in England; witness the

fires of York. It is so to this day in Russia, and where the

_Judenhetze_ inflames innumerable hearts in Central Europe.

No doubt there is more than one side to the persistent phenomenon.

There is a side of mystery; the permissive sentence of the Eternal has

to do with the long affliction, however caused, of the people which

once uttered the fatal cry, "His blood be on us, and on our children"

(Matt. xxvii. 25). And the wrong-doings of Jews, beyond a doubt, have

often made a dark occasion for a "Jew-hatred," on a larger or narrower

scale. But all this leaves unaltered, from the point of view of the

Gospel, the sin of Christendom in its tremendous failure to seek, in

love, the good of erring Israel. It leaves as black as ever the guilt

of every fierce retaliation upon Jews by so-called Christians, of

every slanderous belief about Jewish creed or life, of every unjust

anti-Jewish law ever passed by Christian king or senate. It leaves an

undiminished responsibility upon the Church of Christ, not only for

the flagrant wrong of having too often animated and directed the civil

power in its oppressions of Israel, and not only for having so awfully

neglected to seek the evangelization of Israel by direct appeals for

the true Messiah, and by an open setting forth of His glory, but for

the deeper and more subtle wrong, persistently inflicted from age to

age, in a most guilty unconsciousness--the wrong of having failed to

manifest Christ to Israel through the living holiness of Christendom.

Here, surely, is the very point of the Apostle's thought in the

sentence before us: "_Salvation to the Gentiles, to move the Jews to

jealousy_." In his inspired idea, Gentile Christendom, in Christ, was

to be so pure, so beneficent, so happy, finding manifestly in its

Messianic Lord such resources for both peace of conscience and a life

of noble love, love above all directed towards opponents and

traducers, that Israel, looking on, with eyes however purblind with

prejudice, should soon see a moral glory in the Church's face

impossible to be hid, and be drawn as by a moral magnet to the

Church's hope. Is it the fault of God (may He pardon the formal

question, if it lacks reverence), or the fault of man, man carrying

the Christian name, that facts have been so wofully otherwise in the

course of history? It is the fault, the grievous fault, of us

Christians. The narrow prejudice, the iniquitous law, the rigid

application of exaggerated ecclesiastical principle, all these things

have been man's perversion of the divine idea, to be confessed and

deplored in a deep and interminable repentance. May the mercy of God

awaken Gentile Christendom, in a manner and degree as yet unknown, to

remember this our indefeasible debt to this people everywhere present

with us, everywhere distinct from us;--the debt of _a life_, personal

and ecclesiastical, so manifestly pure and loving in our Lord the

Christ as to "move them to the jealousy" which shall claim Him again

for their own. Then we shall indeed be hastening the day of full and

final blessing, both for themselves and for the world.

To that bright coming day the Apostle points us now, more directly

than ever: [Sidenote: Ver. 12.] =But if their partial fall[190] be the

world's wealth, and their lessening (ἥττημα),= their reduction, (a

reduction in one aspect to a race of scattered exiles, in another to a

mere remnant of "Israelites indeed,") =be the Gentiles' wealth,= the

occasion by which "the unsearchable wealth of Messiah" (Eph. iii. 8)

has been as it were forced into Gentile receptacles, =how much more

their fulness,= the filling of the dry channel with its ample ideal

stream, the change from a believing remnant, fragments of a

fragmentary people, to a believing nation, reanimated and reunited?

What blessings for "the world," for "the Gentiles," may not come

through the vehicle of such an Israel? [Sidenote: Ver. 13.] =But[191]

to you I speak, the Gentiles[192]= to you, because if I reach the

Jews, in the way I mean, it must be through you. =So far indeed as I,

distinctively I (ἐγώ), am the Gentiles' Apostle, I glorify my

ministry= as such; I rejoice, Pharisee that I once was, to be devoted

as no other Apostle is to a ministry for those whom I once thought of

as of outcasts in religion. But I speak as your own Apostle, and to

you, [Sidenote: Ver. 14.] =if perchance I may move the jealousy of my

flesh and blood,[193] and may save some from amongst them,= by letting

them as it were overhear what are the blessings of you Gentile

Christians, and how it is the Lord's purpose to use those blessings as

a magnet to wandering Israel.[194] His hope is that, through the Roman

congregation, this glorious open secret will come out, as they meet

their Jewish neighbours and talk with them. So would one here, another

there, "in the streets and lanes of the City," be drawn to the feet of

Jesus, under the constraint of that "jealousy" which means little else

than the human longing to understand what is evidently the great joy

of another's heart; a "jealousy" on which often grace can fall, and

use it as the vehicle of divine light and life.

He says only, "_some of them_"; as he does in the sister Epistle;

1 Cor. ix. 22.[195] He recognizes it as his present task, indicated

alike by circumstance and revelation, to be not the glad ingatherer of

vast multitudes to Christ, but the patient winner of scattered sheep.

Yet let us observe that none the less he spends his whole soul upon

that winning, and takes no excuse from a glorious future to slacken a

single effort in the difficult present.

[Sidenote: Ver. 15.] =For if the throwing away of them,= their

downfall as the Church of God, was =the world's reconciliation,= the

instrumental or occasioning cause of the direct proclamation to the

pagan peoples of the Atonement of the Cross, =what will their

reception be, but life from the dead?= That is to say, the great event

of Israel's return to God in Christ, and His to Israel, will be the

signal and the means of a vast rise of spiritual life in the Universal

Church, and of an unexampled ingathering of regenerate souls from the

world. When Israel, as a Church, fell, the fall worked good for the

world merely by driving, as it were, the apostolic preachers out from

the Synagogue, to which they so much longed to cling. The Jews did

anything but aid the work. Yet even so they were made an occasion for

world-wide good. When they are "received again," as this Scripture so

definitely affirms that they shall be received, the case will be

grandly different. As before, they will be "occasions." A national and

ecclesiastical return of Israel to Christ will of course give occasion

over the whole world for a vastly quickened attention to Christianity,

and for an appeal for the world's faith in the facts and claims of

Christianity, as bold and loud as that of Pentecost. But more than

this; Israel will now be not only occasion but agent. The Jews,

ubiquitous, cosmopolitan, yet invincibly national, coming back in

living loyalty to the Son of David, the Son of God, will be a positive

power in evangelization such as the Church has never yet felt.

Whatever the actual facts shall prove to be in the matter of their

return to the Land of Promise[196] (and who can watch without deep

reflection the nation-less land and the land-less nation?) no

prediction obliges us to think that the Jews will be withdrawn from

the wide world by a national resettlement in their Land. A nation is

not a Dispersion merely because it has individual citizens widely

dispersed; if it has a true national centre, it is a people at home, a

people with a home. Whether as a central mass in Syria, or as also a

presence everywhere in the human world, Israel will thus be ready,

once restored to God in Christ, to be a more than natural evangelizing

power.

Let this be remembered in every enterprise for the spiritual good of

the great Dispersion now. Through such efforts God is already

approaching His hour of blessing, long expected. Let that fact animate

and give a glad patience to His workers, on whose work He surely

begins in our day to cast His smile of growing blessing.

Now the argument takes a new direction. The restoration thus

indicated, thus foretold, is not only sure to be infinitely

beneficial. It is also to be looked for and expected as a thing lying

so to speak in the line of spiritual fitness, true to the order of

God's plan. In His will, when He went about to create and develop His

Church, Israel sprung from the dry ground as the sacred Olive, rich

with the sap of truth and grace, full of branch and leaf. From the

tents of Abraham onward, the world's true spiritual light and life was

there. There, not elsewhere, was revelation, and God-given ordinance,

and "the covenants, and the glory." There, not elsewhere, the Christ

of God, for whom all things waited, towards whom all the lines of

man's life and history converged, was to appear. Thus, in a certain

profound sense, all true salvation must be not only "of" Israel (John

iv. 24) but through him. Union with Christ was union with Abraham. To

become a Christian, that is to say, one of Messiah's men, was to

become, mystically, an Israelite. From this point of view the

Gentile's union with the Saviour, though not in the least less genuine

and divine than the Jew's, was, so to speak, less normal. And thus

nothing could be more spiritually normal than the Jew's recovery to

his old relation to God, from which he had violently dislocated

himself. These thoughts the Apostle now presses on the Romans, as a

new motive and guide to their hopes, prayers, and work. (Do we gather

from the length and fulness of the argument that already it was

difficult to bring Gentiles to think aright of the chosen people in

their fall and rebellion?) He reminds them of the inalienable

consecration of Israel to special divine purposes. He points them to

the ancient Olive, and boldly tells them that they are, themselves,

only a graft of a wild stock, inserted into the noble tree. Not that

he thinks of the Jew as a superior being. But the Church of Israel was

the original of the Church. So the restoration of Israel to Christ,

and to the Church, is a recovery of normal life, not a first and

abnormal grant of life.

[Sidenote: Ver. 16.] =But if the first-fruit was holy, holy is the

kneaded lump too.= Abraham was as it were the Lord's First-fruits of

mankind, in the field of His Church. "Abraham's seed" are as it were

the mass kneaded from that first-fruits; made of it. Was the

first-fruits holy, in the sense of consecration to God's redeeming

purpose? Then that which is made of it must somehow still be a

consecrated thing, even though put aside as if "common" for awhile.

=And if the root= was =holy,= holy are =the branches too;= the lineal

heirs of Abraham are still, ideally, potentially, consecrated to Him

who separated Abraham to Himself, and moved him to his great

self-separation. [Sidenote: Ver. 17.] =But if some of the branches=

(how tender is the euphemism of the "_some_"!) =were broken off, while

you, wild-olive as you were, were grafted in among them,= in their

place of life and growth, =and became a sharer of the root and of the

Olive's fatness,--= [Sidenote: Ver. 18.] =do not boast over the=

torn-off =branches. But if you do boast over them--not you carry the

root, but the root carries you.= [Sidenote: Ver. 19.] =You will say

then, The branches were broken off--that I might be grafted in. Good:=

true--and untrue: =because of their unbelief they were broken off,

while you because of your faith stand.= They were no better beings

than you, in themselves. But neither are you better than they, in

yourself. They and you alike are, personally, mere subjects of

redeeming mercy; owing all to Christ; possessing all only as accepting

Christ. "Where is your boasting, then?" =Do not be high-minded, but

fear,= fear yourself, your sin, your enemy. [Sidenote: Ver. 21.] =For

if God did not spare the natural branches, take care lest He spare not

you either.= [Sidenote: Ver. 22.] =See therefore God's goodness and

sternness. On those who fell,= came His =sternness= (ἀποτομία, not

ἀποτομίαν); =but on you,= His =goodness, if you abide by that (τῇ)

goodness,= with the adherence and response of faith; =since you too

will be cut out= otherwise. [Sidenote: Ver. 23.] =And they too, if

they do not abide by their (τῇ) unbelief, shall be grafted in; for

God is able to graft them in again.= [Sidenote: Ver. 24.] =For if you

from the naturally wild olive were cut out, and non-naturally (παρὰ

φύσιν) were grafted into the Garden-Olive, how much more shall

those, the= branches =naturally, be grafted into their own Olive!=

Here are more topics than one which call for reverent notice and

study.

1. The imagery of the Olive, with its root, stem, and branches. The

Olive, rich and useful, long-lived, and evergreen, stands, as a

"nature-parable" of spiritual life, beside the Vine, the Palm, and the

Cedar, in the Garden of God. Sometimes it pictures the individual

saint, living and fruitful in union with his Lord (Psal. lii. 8).

Sometimes it sets before us the fertile organism of the Church, as

here, where the Olive is the great Church Universal in its long life

before and after the historical coming of Christ; the life which in a

certain sense began with the Call of Abraham, and was only

magnificently developed by the Incarnation and Passion. Its Root, in

this respect, is the great Father of Faith. Its Stem is the Church of

the Old Testament, which coincided, in the matter of external

privilege, with the nation of Israel, and to which at least the

immense majority of true believers in the elder time belonged. Its

Branches (by a slight and easy modification of the image) are its

individual members, whether Jewish or Gentile. The Master of the Tree,

arriving on the scene in the Gospel age, comes as it were to prune His

Olive, and to graft. The Jewish "branch," if he is what he seems, if

he believes indeed and not only by hypothesis, abides in the Tree.

Otherwise, he is--from the divine point of view--broken off. The

Gentile, believing, is grafted in, and becomes a true part of the

living organism; as genuinely and vitally one with Abraham in life and

blessing as his Hebrew brother. But the fact of the Hebrew "race" in

root and stem rules still so far as to make the re-ingrafting of a

Hebrew branch, repenting, more "natural" (not more possible, or more

beneficial, but more "natural") than the first ingrafting of a Gentile

branch. The whole Tree is for ever Abrahamic, Israelite, in stock and

growth; though all mankind has place now in its forest of branches.

2. The imagery of Grafting. Here is an instance of partial, while

truthful, use of a natural process in Scripture parable. In our

gardens and orchards it is the wild stock which receives, in grafting,

the "good" branch; a fact which lends itself to many fertile

illustrations. Here, on the contrary, the "wild" branch is inserted

into the "good" stock. But the olive-yard yields to the Apostle all

the imagery he really needs. He has before him, ready to hand, the

Tree of the Church; all that he wants is an illustration of

communication and union of life by artificial insertion. And this he

finds in the olive-dresser's art, which shews him how a vegetable

fragment, apart and alien, can by human design be made to grow into

the life of the tree, as if a native of the root.

3. The teaching of the passage as to the Place of Israel in the divine

Plan of life for the world. We have remarked on this already, but it

calls for reiterated notice and recollection. "At sundry times, and in

divers manners," and through many and divers races and civilizations,

God has dealt with man, and is dealing with him, in the training and

development of his life and nature. But in the matter of man's

spiritual salvation, in the gift to him, in his Fall, of the life

eternal, God has dealt with man, practically, through _one_ race,

Israel. Let it never be forgotten that the "sundry times and divers

manners" of the apostolic Epistle (Heb. i. 1) are all referred to "the

prophets"; they are the "times" and "manners" of the Old Testament

revelation. And when at length the same Eternal Voice spoke to man

"_in the Son_" (ἐν Ὑιῷ), that Son came of Israel, "took hold of

Abraham's seed" (Heb. ii. 16), and Himself bore definite witness that

"salvation is from the Jews" (John iv. 24). Amidst the unknown

manifoldness of the work of God for man, and in man, this is single

and simple--that in one racial line only runs the stream of authentic

and supernatural revelation; in the line of this mysteriously chosen

Israel. From this point of view, the great Husbandman has planted not

a forest but a Tree; and the innumerable trees of the forest can get

the sap of Eden only as their branches are grafted by His hand into

His one Tree, by the faith which unites them to Him who is the Root

below the root, "the Root of David," and of Abraham.

4. The appeal to the new-grafted "branch" to "abide by the goodness of

God." We have listened, as St Paul has dictated to his scribe, to many

a deep word about a divine and sovereign power on man; about man's

absolute debt to God for the fact that he believes and lives. Yet

here, with equal decision, we have man thrown back on the thought of

his responsibility, of the contingency in a certain sense of his

safety on his fidelity.[197] "If you are true to mercy, mercy will be

true to you; otherwise you too will be broken off." Here, as in our

study of earlier passages, let us be willing to go all along with

Scripture in the seeming inconsistency of its absolute promises and

its contingent cautions. Let us, like it, "go to both extremes"; then

we shall be as near, probably, as our finite thought can be at present

to the whole truth as it moves, a perfect sphere, in God. Is the

Christian worn and wearied with his experience of his own pollution,

instability, and helplessness? Let him embrace, without a misgiving,

the whole of that promise, "My sheep shall never perish." Has he

drifted into a vain confidence, not in Christ, but in privilege, in

experience, in apparent religious prosperity? Has he caught himself in

the act of saying, even in a whisper, "God, I thank Thee that I am not

as other men are"? Then let him listen in time to the warning voice,

"Be not high-minded, but fear"; "Take heed lest He spare not thee."

And let him put no pillow of theory between the sharpness of that

warning and his soul. Penitent, self-despairing, resting in Christ

alone, let him "_abide by the goodness of God_."

[189] Παράπτωμα: so we venture to render the word here, where its

compound form gets a special point from its neighbourhood to the

simple verb πίπτειν (πέσωσι).

[190] Παράπτωμα: see above p. 294.

[191] Read δὲ not γάρ. It is the "_but_" of a slight pause and

resumption.

[192] The converts of the Roman Mission were surely Gentiles for the

most part. See further below, ver. 25.

[193] Τὴν σάρκα μου: we venture to write "_flesh and blood_" as the

nearest equivalent in our parlance to the vigorous Greek, "_my

flesh_."

[194] It will be seen that we punctuate the Greek here as follows:

Ὑμῖν δὲ λέγω τοῖς ἔθνεσιν (ἐφ' ὅσον μὲν οὖν εἰμὶ ἐγὼ ἐθνῶν ἀπόστολος,

τὴν διακονίαν μου δοξάζω) εἴ πῶς κτλ. The thought of his "_glory_"

in his "_ministry_" is surely _parenthetical_; thrown in to remind

them that his plea for Israel means no change of heart towards his

Gentile converts, or any wavering in the certainty that in Christ they

are as completely "the people of God" as Israel is. The "main line" of

the sentence runs past this parenthesis: "To you Gentiles I speak, in

the hope of moving the jealousy of the Jews."

[195] Cp. too 2 Cor. iii. 14-16 with this whole passage.

[196] This chapter is silent on that great matter.

[197] "To our safety our sedulity is required." Hooker, _Sermon on the

Perpetuity of Faith in the Elect_ (at the close of the sermon). See

the whole sermon, with its temperate and well-balanced assertion of

the power of grace.

The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle of St Paul to the Romans · 第 23 / 32 章