STRATEGIC DOCTRINE

This Administration's systematic contributions to the necessary evolution

of strategic doctrine began in 1977 when I commissioned a comprehensive net

assessment. From that base a number of thorough investigations of specific

topics continued. I should emphasize that the need for an evolutionary

doctrine is driven not by any change in our basic objective, which remains

peace and freedom for all mankind. Rather, the need for change is driven by

the inexorable buildup of Soviet military power and the increasing

propensity of Soviet leaders to use this power in coercion and outright

aggression to impose their will on others.

I have codified our evolving strategic doctrine in a number of interrelated

and mutually supporting Presidential Directives. Their overarching theme is

to provide a doctrinal basis, and the specific program to implement it,

that tells the world that no potential adversary of the United States could

ever conclude that the fruits of his aggression would be significant or

worth the enormous costs of our retaliation.

The Presidential Directives include:

PD-18: An overview of our strategic objectives PD-37: Basic space policy

PD-41: Civil Defense PD-53: Survivability and endurance for

telecommunications PD-57: Mobilization planning PD-58: Continuity of

Government PD-59: Countervailing Strategy for General War.

These policies have been devised to deter, first and foremost, Soviet

aggression. As such they confront not only Soviet military forces but also

Soviet military doctrine. By definition deterrence requires that we shape

Soviet assessments about the risks of war, assessments they will make using

their doctrine, not ours.

But at the same time we in no way seek to emulate their doctrine. In

particular, nothing in our policy contemplates that nuclear warfare could

ever be a deliberate instrument for achieving our own goals of peace and

freedom. Moreover, our policies are carefully devised to provide the

greatest possible incentives and opportunities for future progress in arms

control.

Finally, our doctrinal evolution has been undertaken with appropriate

consultation with our NATO Allies and others. We are fully consistent with

NATO's strategy of flexible response.

State of the Union Addresses(#5045) · 第 97 / 130 题