POETS, MINOR AND MAJOR.

Perhaps no branch of literary reputation is so difficult to establish as

that of first-rate poetic excellence. During the last fifty years, many

meritorious competitors for bardic renown have successively aspired to

public favour, and have each in their turns exhibited their fancy-woven

_bouquets_, as containing a more beautiful assemblage of "flowers of all

hue," as Milton divinely sings, than those which their equally emulative

and praiseworthy compeers have, in their best attempts, laid out upon

the _parterre_ of the public. In the poetic foreground of the above

period, are to be seen the names of Pye, Ogilvie, Whitehead, Tasker,

Mason, Cowper, Merry, Jerningham, Woty, Hurdis, Pratt, Fitzgerald, &c.

over whose metrical effusions, with the exception of the fifth and

sixth, the clouds of obscurity have long since cast a darkening hue.

Even the "Elegaic Sonnets" of Charlotte Smith, which first appeared in

1784, and formed a sort of poetical era in point of popularity, have

long since "fallen into the sere and yellow leaf," as it was

discriminately hinted by Burns would be the case with his soul-breathing

Letters; the Sonnets by the Rev. W.L. Bowles, although emanating from a

beautiful fountain-spring of thought and feeling, which should have

screened their writer from the venomous shaft of Byron, have already

sunk beneath the meridian of their popularity; and the loaded ornamental

rhymes of Darwin; the prettily embroidered couplets of Miss Seward,

together with the Della Cruscan Rhymes of Mary Robinson, Mrs. Cowley,

&c. are left like daisies, plucked from the greensward, to perish

beneath unfeeling neglect. Who now reads the verses of Ann Yearsley, the

poetic milkwoman, who was so lauded beyond her deserts, by Mrs. H.

More?--few or none. Why is this revolution in public taste? Because

those master-spirits which guide the present age, have given birth to a

species of poetry more legitimate and useful in its design, and more

valuable in its tendencies and characteristics. Instead of the "namby

pamby" verses of the period I have alluded to, and the coarse scurrility

of style which runs with a discolouring vein through the satirical pages

of Dr. Wolcot, we have now the heart-stirring metres of a Campbell, as

in that beautiful rainbow of poetic loveliness and imagination, his

"Pleasures of Hope." We have now a series of pictures bearing an impress

as pleasant as the gleams of warm autumn in the "Pleasures of Memory,"

by Rogers; the wildness of Loutherbourgh, the grandeur of Salvator Rosa,

the terror-striking forms of Fuseli, embodied with increased energy in

the immortal Lays of Byron: the every-day incidents of life, copied with

the graphic fidelity of a Sharp, and bearing the faithful stamp of

cottage grouping, which distinguished the pencil of a Morland,--in the

natural paintings of Crabbe. We have Catullus stealing from his couch,

to breathe a new intonation into the harp of Moore; and last of all, we

have the votaress of virtue and moral feeling, the Cambrian minstrel,

Mrs. Hemans, making melancholy appear as delightful as love.

_The Author of a Tradesman's Lays._

* * * * *

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 20, No. 559, July 28, 1832 · 第 3 / 21 题