CHAPTER III

SYMBOLS

Probably it will elucidate the drift of these foregoing obscure

utterances, if we here insert somewhat of our Professor's speculations

on _Symbols_. To state his whole doctrine, indeed, were beyond our

compass: nowhere is he more mysterious, impalpable, than in this of

'Fantasy being the organ of the God-like;' and how 'Man thereby,

though based, to all seeming, on the small Visible, does nevertheless

extend down into the infinite deeps of the Invisible, of which

Invisible, indeed, his Life is properly the bodying forth.' Let us,

omitting these high transcendental aspects of the matter, study to

glean (whether from the Paper-bags or the Printed Volume) what little

seems logical and practical, and cunningly arrange it into such degree

of coherence as it will assume. By way of proem, take the following

not injudicious remarks:

'The benignant efficacies of Concealment,' cries our Professor, 'who

shall speak or sing? SILENCE and SECRECY! Altars might still be raised

to them (were this an altar-building time) for universal worship.

Silence is the element in which great things fashion themselves

together; that at length they may emerge, full-formed and majestic,

into the daylight of Life, which they are thenceforth to rule. Not

William the Silent only, but all the considerable men I have known,

and the most undiplomatic and unstrategic of these, forbore to babble

of what they were creating and projecting. Nay, in thy own mean

perplexities, do thou thyself but _hold thy tongue for one day_: on

the morrow, how much clearer are thy purposes and duties; what wreck

and rubbish have those mute workmen within thee swept away, when

intrusive noises were shut out! Speech is too often not, as the

Frenchman defined it, the art of concealing Thought; but of quite

stifling and suspending Thought, so that there is none to conceal.

Speech too is great, but not the greatest. As the Swiss Inscription

says: _Sprechen ist silbern, Schweigen ist golden_ (Speech is silvern,

Silence is golden); or as I might rather express it: Speech is of

Time, Silence is of Eternity.

'Bees will not work except in darkness; Thought will not work except

in Silence; neither will Virtue work except in Secrecy. Let not thy

left hand know what thy right hand doeth! Neither shalt thou prate

even to thy own heart of "those secrets known to all." Is not Shame

(_Schaam_) the soil of all Virtue, of all good manners and good

morals? Like other plants, Virtue will not grow unless its root be

hidden, buried from the eye of the sun. Let the sun shine on it, nay

do but look at it privily thyself, the root withers, and no flower

will glad thee. O my Friends, when we view the fair clustering flowers

that over-wreathe, for example, the Marriage-bower, and encircle man's

life with the fragrance and hues of Heaven, what hand will not smite

the foul plunderer that grubs them up by the roots, and with grinning,

grunting satisfaction, shows us the dung they flourish in! Men speak

much of the Printing-Press with its Newspapers: _du Himmel!_ what are

these to Clothes and the Tailor's Goose?'

'Of kin to the so incalculable influences of Concealment, and

connected with still greater things, is the wondrous agency of

_Symbols_. In a Symbol there is concealment and yet revelation: here

therefore, by Silence and by Speech acting together, comes a double

significance. And if both the Speech be itself high, and the Silence

fit and noble, how expressive will their union be! Thus in many a

painted Device, or simple Seal-emblem, the commonest Truth stands-out

to us proclaimed with quite new emphasis.

'For it is here that Fantasy with her mystic wonderland plays into the

small prose domain of Sense, and becomes incorporated therewith. In

the Symbol proper, what we can call a Symbol, there is ever, more or

less distinctly and directly, some embodiment and revelation of the

Infinite; the Infinite is made to blend itself with the Finite, to

stand visible, and as it were, attainable there. By Symbols,

accordingly, is man guided and commanded, made happy, made wretched.

He everywhere finds himself encompassed with Symbols, recognised as

such or not recognised: the Universe is but one vast Symbol of God;

nay if thou wilt have it, what is man himself but a Symbol of God; is

not all that he does symbolical; a revelation to Sense of the mystic

god-given force that is in him; a "Gospel of Freedom," which he, the

"Messias of Nature," preaches, as he can, by act and word? Not a Hut

he builds but is the visible embodiment of a Thought; but bears

visible record of invisible things; but is, in the transcendental

sense, symbolical as well as real.'

'Man,' says the Professor elsewhere, in quite antipodal contrast with

these high-soaring delineations, which we have here cut short on the

verge of the inane, 'Man is by birth somewhat of an owl. Perhaps, too,

of all the owleries that ever possessed him, the most owlish, if we

consider it, is that of your actually existing Motive-Millwrights.

Fantastic tricks enough man has played, in his time; has fancied

himself to be most things, down even to an animated heap of Glass; but

to fancy himself a dead Iron-Balance for weighing Pains and Pleasures

on, was reserved for this his latter era. There stands he, his

Universe one huge Manger, filled with hay and thistles to be weighed

against each other; and looks long-eared enough. Alas, poor devil!

spectres are appointed to haunt him: one age he is hag-ridden,

bewitched; the next, priestridden, befooled; in all ages, bedevilled.

And now the Genius of Mechanism smothers him worse than any Nightmare

did; till the Soul is nigh choked out of him, and only a kind of

Digestive, Mechanic life remains. In Earth and in Heaven he can see

nothing but Mechanism; has fear for nothing else, hope in nothing

else: the world would indeed grind him to pieces; but cannot he fathom

the Doctrine of Motives, and cunningly compute these, and mechanise

them to grind the other way?

'Were he not, as has been said, purblinded by enchantment, you had but

to bid him open his eyes and look. In which country, in which time,

was it hitherto that man's history, or the history of any man, went on

by calculated or calculable "Motives"? What make ye of your

Christianities, and Chivalries, and Reformations, and Marseillese

Hymns, and Reigns of Terror? Nay, has not perhaps the Motive-grinder

himself been _in Love_? Did he never stand so much as a contested

Election? Leave him to Time, and the medicating virtue of Nature.'

'Yes, Friends,' elsewhere observes the Professor, 'not our Logical,

Mensurative faculty, but our Imaginative one is King over us; I might

say, Priest and Prophet to lead us heavenward; our Magician and Wizard

to lead us hellward. Nay, even for the basest Sensualist, what is

Sense but the implement of Fantasy; the vessel it drinks out of? Ever

in the dullest existence there is a sheen either of Inspiration or of

Madness (thou partly hast it in thy choice, which of the two), that

gleams-in from the circumambient Eternity, and colours with its own

hues our little islet of Time. The Understanding is indeed thy window,

too clear thou canst not make it; but Fantasy is thy eye, with its

colour-giving retina, healthy or diseased. Have not I myself known

five-hundred living soldiers sabred into crows'-meat for a piece of

glazed cotton, which they called their Flag; which, had you sold it at

any market-cross, would not have brought above three groschen? Did not

the whole Hungarian Nation rise, like some tumultuous moon-stirred

Atlantic, when Kaiser Joseph pocketed their Iron Crown; an Implement,

as was sagaciously observed, in size and commercial value little

differing from a horse-shoe? It is in and through _Symbols_ that man,

consciously or unconsciously, lives, works, and has his being: those

ages, moreover, are accounted the noblest which can the best recognise

symbolical worth, and prize it the highest. For is not a Symbol ever,

to him who has eyes for it, some dimmer or clearer revelation of the

Godlike?

'Of Symbols, however, I remark farther, that they have both an

extrinsic and intrinsic value; oftenest the former only. What, for

instance, was in that clouted Shoe, which the Peasants bore aloft with

them as ensign in their _Bauernkrieg_ (Peasants' War)? Or in the

Wallet-and-staff round which the Netherland _Gueux_, glorying in that

nickname of Beggars, heroically rallied and prevailed, though against

King Philip himself? Intrinsic significance these had none: only

extrinsic; as the accidental Standards of multitudes more or less

sacredly uniting together; in which union itself, as above noted,

there is ever something mystical and borrowing of the Godlike. Under a

like category, too, stand, or stood, the stupidest heraldic

Coats-of-arms; military Banners everywhere; and generally all national

or other Sectarian Costumes and Customs: they have no intrinsic,

necessary divineness, or even worth; but have acquired an extrinsic

one. Nevertheless through all these there glimmers something of a

Divine Idea; as through military Banners themselves, the Divine Idea

of Duty, of heroic Daring; in some instances of Freedom, of Right.

Nay, the highest ensign that men ever met and embraced under, the

Cross itself, had no meaning save an accidental extrinsic one.

'Another matter it is, however, when your Symbol has intrinsic

meaning, and is of itself _fit_ that men should unite round it. Let

but the Godlike manifest itself to Sense; let but Eternity look, more

or less visibly, through the Time-Figure (_Zeitbild_)! Then is it fit

that men unite there; and worship together before such Symbol; and so

from day to day, and from age to age, superadd to it new divineness.

'Of this latter sort are all true works of Art: in them (if thou know

a Work of Art from a Daub of Artifice) wilt thou discern Eternity

looking through Time; the Godlike rendered visible. Here too may an

extrinsic value gradually superadd itself: thus certain _Iliads_, and

the like, have, in three-thousand years, attained quite new

significance. But nobler than all in this kind, are the Lives of

heroic god-inspired Men; for what other Work of Art is so divine? In

Death too, in the Death of the Just, as the last perfection of a Work

of Art, may we not discern symbolic meaning? In that divinely

transfigured Sleep, as of Victory, resting over the beloved face which

now knows thee no more, read (if thou canst for tears) the confluence

of Time with Eternity, and some gleam of the latter peering through.

'Highest of all Symbols are those wherein the Artist or Poet has risen

into Prophet, and all men can recognise a present God, and worship the

same: I mean religious Symbols. Various enough have been such

religious Symbols, what we call _Religions_; as men stood in this

stage of culture or the other, and could worse or better body-forth

the Godlike: some Symbols with a transient intrinsic worth; many with

only an extrinsic. If thou ask to what height man has carried it in

this manner, look on our divinest Symbol: on Jesus of Nazareth, and

his Life, and his Biography, and what followed therefrom. Higher has

the human Thought not yet reached: this is Christianity and

Christendom; a Symbol of quite perennial, infinite character: whose

significance will ever demand to be anew inquired into, and anew made

manifest.

'But, on the whole, as time adds much to the sacredness of Symbols, so

likewise in his progress he at length defaces or even desecrates them;

and Symbols, like all terrestrial Garments, wax old. Homer's Epos has

not ceased to be true; yet it is no longer _our_ Epos, but shines in

the distance, if clearer and clearer, yet also smaller and smaller,

like a receding Star. It needs a scientific telescope, it needs to be

reinterpreted and artificially brought near us, before we can so much

as know that it _was_ a Sun. So likewise a day comes when the Runic

Thor, with his Eddas, must withdraw into dimness; and many an African

Mumbo-Jumbo and Indian Pawaw be utterly abolished. For all things,

even Celestial Luminaries, much more atmospheric meteors, have their

rise, their culmination, their decline.'

'Small is this which thou tellest me, that the Royal Sceptre is but a

piece of gilt-wood; that the Pyx has become a most foolish box, and

truly, as Ancient Pistol thought, "of little price." A right Conjuror

might I name thee, couldst thou conjure back into these wooden tools

the divine virtue they once held.'

'Of this thing, however, be certain: wouldst thou plant for Eternity,

then plant into the deep infinite faculties of man, his Fantasy and

Heart; wouldst thou plant for Year and Day, then plant into his

shallow superficial faculties, his Self-love and Arithmetical

Understanding, what will grow there. A Hierarch, therefore, and

Pontiff of the World will we call him, the Poet and inspired Maker;

who, Prometheus-like, can shape new Symbols, and bring new Fire from

Heaven to fix it there. Such too will not always be wanting; neither

perhaps now are. Meanwhile, as the average of matters goes, we account

him Legislator and wise who can so much as tell when a Symbol has

grown old, and gently remove it.

'When, as the last English Coronation[3] was preparing,' concludes

this wonderful Professor, 'I read in their Newspapers that the

"Champion of England," he who has to offer battle to the Universe for

his new King, had brought it so far that he could now "mount his horse

with little assistance," I said to myself: Here also we have a Symbol

well-nigh superannuated. Alas, move whithersoever you may, are not the

tatters and rags of superannuated worn-out symbols (in this Ragfair of

a World) dropping off everywhere, to hoodwink, to halter, to tether

you; nay, if you shake them not aside, threatening to accumulate, and

perhaps produce suffocation?'

[3] That of George IV.--ED.

Sartor Resartus, and On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History · 第 3 / 16 章