INTO GOOD GROUND.

"_WHAT_ did you think of the sermon, Mr. Braxton?" said one church

member to another, as the two men passed from the vestibule of St.

Mark's out into the lofty portico.

Mr. Braxton gave a slight shrug, perceived by his companion as a sign

of disapproval. They moved along, side by side, down the broad steps to

the pavement, closely pressed by the retiring audience.

"Strong meat," said the first speaker, as they got free of the crowd

and commenced moving down the street.

"Too strong for my stomach," replied Mr. Braxton. "Something must have

gone wrong with our minister when he sat down to write that discourse."

"Indigestion, perhaps."

"Or neuralgia," said Mr. Braxton.

"He was in no amiable mood--that much is certain. Why, he set

nine-tenths of us over on the left hand side, among the goats, as

remorselessly as if he were an avenging Nemesis. He actually made me

shudder."

"That kind of literal application of texts to the living men and women

in a congregation is not only in bad taste, but presumptuous and

blasphemous. What right has a clergyman to sit in judgment on me, for

instance? To give forced constructions to parables and vague

generalities in Scripture, about the actual meaning of which divines in

all ages have differed; and, pointing his finger to me or to you,

say--'The case is yours, sir!' I cannot sit patiently under many more

such sermons."

Mr. Braxton evidently spoke from a disturbed state of mind. Something

in the discourse had struck at the foundations of self-love and

self-complacency.

"Into one ear, and out at the other. So it is with me, in cases like

this," answered Mr. Braxton's companion, in a changed and lighter tone.

"If a preacher chooses to be savage; to write from dyspeptic or

neuralgic states; to send his congregation, unshrived, to the nether

regions--why, I shrug my shoulders and let it pass. Most likely, on the

next Sunday, he will be full of consideration for tender consciences,

and grandly shut the gate he threw open so widely on the last occasion.

It would never answer, you know, to take these things to heart--never

in the world. We'd always be getting into hot water. Clergymen have

their moods, like other people. It doesn't answer to forget this. Good

morning, Mr. Braxton. Our ways part here."

"Good morning," was replied, and the men separated.

But, try as Mr. Braxton would to set his minister's closely applied

doctrine from Scripture to the account of dyspepsia or neuralgia, he

was unable to push from his mind certain convictions wrought therein by

the peculiar manner in which some positions had been argued and

sustained. The subject taken by the minister, was that striking picture

of the judgment given in the twenty-fifth chapter of Matthew, from the

thirty-first verse to the close of the chapter, beginning: "When the

Son of Man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him,

then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: and before him shall be

gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a

shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats." The passage concludes:

"And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous

into life eternal."

Now, although Mr. Braxton had complained of the literal application of

this text, that term was hardly admissible, for the preacher waived the

idea of a last general judgment, as involved in the letter of

Scripture, and declared his belief in a spiritual signification as

lying beneath the letter, and applicable to the inner life of every

single individual at the period of departure from this world; adding,

in this connection, briefly: "But do not understand me as in any degree

waiving the strictness of judgment to which every soul will have to

submit. It will not be limited by his acts, but go down to his ends of

life--to his motives and his quality--and the sentence will really be a

judgment upon what he _is_, not upon what he has _done_; although,

taking the barest literal sense, only actions are regarded."

In opening and illustrating his text, he said, farther: "As the word of

God, according to its own declarations, is spirit and life--treats, in

fact, by virtue of divine and Scriptural origin, of divine and

spiritual things, must we not go beneath the merely obvious and natural

meaning, if we would get to its true significance? Is there not a

hunger of the soul as well as of the body? May we not be spiritually

athirst, and strangers?--naked, sick, and in prison? This being so, can

we confidently look for the invitation, 'Come, ye blessed of my Father,

if our regard for the neighbor have not reached beyond his bodily life?

If we have never considered his spiritual wants and sufferings, and

ministered thereto according to our ability? Just in the degree that

the soul is more precious than the body, is the degree of our

responsibility under this more interior signification of Scripture. The

mere natural acts of feeding the hungry and giving water to the

thirsty, of visiting the sick, and those who lie in prison, of clothing

the naked and entertaining strangers, will not save us in our last day,

if we have neglected the higher duties involved in the divine

admonition. Nor will even the supply of spiritual nourishment to hungry

and thirsty souls be accounted to us for righteousness. We must find a

higher meaning still in the text. Are we not, each one of us, starving

for heavenly food?--spiritually exhausted with thirst?--naked, sick, in

prison? Are we eating, daily, of the bread of life?--drinking at the

wells of God's truth?--putting on the garments of

righteousness?--finding balm for our sick souls in Gilead?--breaking

the bonds of evil?--turning from strange lands, and coming back to our

father's house. If not, I warn you, men and brethren, that you are not

in the right way;--that, taking the significance of God's word, which

is truth itself, there is no reasonable ground of hope for your

salvation."

It was not with Mr. Braxton as with his friend. He could not let

considerations like these enter one ear and go out at the other. From

earliest childhood he had received careful instruction. Parents,

teachers and preachers, had all shared in the work of storing his mind

with the precepts of religion, and now, in manhood, his conscience

rested on these and upon the states wrought therefrom in the

impressible substance of his mind. Try as he would, he found the effort

to push aside early convictions and early impressions a simple

impossibility; and, notwithstanding these had been laid on the

foundation of a far more literal interpretation of Scripture than the

one to which he had just been listening, his maturer reason accepted

the preacher's clear application of the law; and conscience, like an

angel, went down into his heart, and troubled the waters which had been

at peace.

Mr. Braxton was a man of thrift. He had started in life with a purpose,

and that purpose he was steadily attaining. To the god of this world he

offered daily sacrifice; and in his heart really desired no higher good

than seemed attainable through outward things. Wealth, position, honor,

among men--these bounded his real aspirations. But prior things in his

mind were continually reaching down and affecting his present states.

He could not forget that life was short, and earthly possessions and

honors but the things of a day. That as he brought nothing into this

world, so he could take nothing out. That, without a religious life, he

must not hope for heaven. In order to get free from the disturbing

influence of these prior things, and to lay the foundations of a future

hope, Mr. Braxton became a church member, and, so far as all Sabbath

observances were concerned, a devout worshiper. Thus he made a truce

with conscience, and conscience having gained so much, accepted for a

period the truce, and left Mr. Braxton in good odor with himself.

A man who goes regularly to church, and reads his Bible, cannot fail to

have questions and controversies about truths, duties, and the

requirements of religion. The barest literal interpretation of

Scripture will, in most cases, oppose the action of self-love; and he

will not fail to see in the law of spiritual life a requirement wholly

in opposition to the law of natural life. In the very breadth of this

literal requirement, however, he finds a way of escape from literal

observance. To give to all who ask; to lend to all who would borrow; to

yield the cloak when the coat is taken forcibly; to turn the left cheek

when the right is smitten--all this is to him so evidently but a figure

of speech, that he does not find it very hard to satisfy conscience.

Setting these passages aside, as not to be taken in the sense of the

letter, he does not find it very difficult to dispose of others that

come nearer to the obvious duties of man to man--such, for instance, as

that in the illustration of which, by the preacher, Mr. Braxton's

self-complacency had been so much disturbed. He had never done much in

the way of feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, clothing

the naked, or visiting the sick and in prison--never done anything of

set purpose, in fact. If people were hungry, it was mostly their own

fault, and to feed them would be to encourage idleness and vice. All

the other items in the catalogue were as easily disposed of; and so the

literal duties involved might have been set forth in the most

impassioned eloquence, Sabbath after Sabbath, without much disturbing

the fine equipose of Mr. Braxton. Alas for his peace of mind!--the

preacher of truth had gone past the dead letter, and revealed its

spirit and its life. Suddenly he felt himself removed, as it were, to

an almost impossible distance from the heaven into which, as he had

complacently flattered himself, he should enter by the door of mere

ritual observances, when the sad hour came for giving up the delightful

things of this pleasant world. No wonder that Mr. Braxton was

disturbed--no wonder that, in his first convictions touching those more

interior truths, which made visible the sandy foundations whereon he

was building his eternal hopes, he should regard the application of

doctrine as personal and even literal.

It was not so easy a thing to set aside the duty of ministering to the

hungry, sick, and naked human souls around him, thousands of whom, for

lack of spiritual nourishment, medicine and clothing, were in danger of

perishing eternally. And the preacher in dwelling upon this great duty

of all Christian men and women, had used emphatic language.

"I give you," he said, "God's judgment of the case--not my own.

'Inasmuch as ye did it not unto one of the least of these, ye did it

not unto me. And these shall go away;' where? 'To everlasting

punishment!' Who shall go thus, in the last day, from this

congregation?"

As Mr. Braxton sat alone on the evening of that Sabbath, troubled by

the new thoughts which came flowing into his mind, the full impression

of this scene in church came back upon him. There was an almost

breathless pause. Men leaned forward in their pews; the low, almost

whispered, tones of the minister were heard with thrilling distinctness

in even the remotest parts of the house.

"Who?" he repeated, and the stillness grew more profound. Then, slowly,

impressively, almost sadly, he said:

"I cannot hide the truth. As God's ambassador, I must give the message;

and it is this: If you, my brother, are not ministering to the wants of

the hungry and thirsty, the stranger, the sick and in prison, you are

of those who will have to go away."

And the minister shut the Book, and sat down. If, as we have intimated,

the preacher had limited Christian duty to bodily needs, Mr. Braxton

would not have been much exercised in mind.

He had found an easy way to dispose of these merely literal

interpretations of Scripture. Now, his life was brought to the judgment

of a more interior law, as expounded that day. It was in vain that he

endeavored to reject the law; for the more he tried to do this, the

clearer it was seen in the light of perceptive truth.

"God help me, if this be so!" he exclaimed, in a moment of more perfect

realization of what was meant in the Divine Word. "Who shall stand in

the judgment?"

For awhile he endeavored to turn himself away from convictions that

were grounding themselves deeper and deeper every moment,--to shut his

eyes in wilful blindness, and refuse to see in the purer light which

had fallen around him. But this effort only brought his mind into

severer conflict, and consciously removed him to an almost fatal

distance from the paths leading upward to the mountains of peace.

"This is the way, walk ye in it." A clear voice rose above the noise of

strife in his soul, and his soul grew calm and listened. He no longer

wrought at the fruitless task of rejecting the higher truths which were

illustrating his mind, but let them flow in, and by virtue thereof

examined the state of his inner life. Now it was that his eyes were in

a degree opened, so that he could apprehend the profounder meanings of

Scripture. The parables were flooded with new light. He understood, as

he had never understood before, why the guest, unclothed with a wedding

garment, was cast out from the feast; and why the door was shut upon

the virgins who had no oil in their lamps. He had always regarded these

parables as involving a hidden meaning--as intended to convey spiritual

instruction under literal forms--but, now, they spoke in a language

that applied itself to his inward state, and warned him that without a

marriage garment, woven in the loom of interior life, where motives

rule, he could never be the King's guest; warned him that without the

light of divine truth in his understanding, and the oil of love to God

and the neighbor in his heart, the door of the kingdom would be shut

against him. Ritual observances were, to these, but outward forms, dry

husks, except when truly representative of that worship in the soul

which subordinates natural affections to what is spiritual and divine.

At last the seed fell into good ground. Mr. Braxton had been a

"way-side" hearer; but, ere the good seed had time to germinate, fowls

came and devoured it. He had been a "stony-ground" hearer, receiving

the truth with gladness, but having no root in himself. He had been as

the ground choked with thorns, suffering the cares of this world and

the deceitfulness of riches to choke and hinder the growth of heavenly

life. Now, into good ground the seed had at last fallen; and though the

evil one tried to snatch it away, its hidden life, moving to the

earth's quick invitation, was already giving prophetic signs of thirty,

sixty, or a hundredfold, in the harvest time.

Why was there good ground in the mind of Mr. Braxton? Good ground, even

though he was wedded to external life; a self-seeker; a lover of the

world? In the answer to this question lies a most important truth for

all to whom God has committed the care of children. Unless good ground

is formed, as it was in his case, by early instruction; by storing up

in the memory truths from the Bible, and states of good affection; by

weaving into the web and woof of the forming mind precepts of

religion--there is small hope for the future. If these are not made a

part of the forming life, things opposite will be received, and

determine spiritual capabilities. Influx of life into the soul must be

through prior things; as the twig is bent, the tree is inclined; as the

child's memory and consciousness is stored, so will the man develop and

progress. Take heart, then, doubting parent; if you have in all

faithfulness, woven precious truths, and tender, pious, unselfish

states into the texture of your child's mind--though the fruit is not

yet seen, depend on it, that the treasured remains of good and true

things are there, and will not be lost.

All's for the Best · 第 22 / 38 题