CHAPTER IX.

_Trap and Ball.--Gifts from the Vicar.--An Antiquarian History of

the Ball.--The See-saw.--The Mechanical Powers.--The Swing.--The

Doctrine of Oscillation.--Galileo’s Discovery.--The

Pendulum.--An interesting letter.--Mr. Seymour and the Vicar

visit Major Snapwell._

Mr. Seymour, having observed his children busily engaged at the game of

Trap and Ball, determined, as usual, to make it subservient to

scientific instruction. With this view he hastily sketched a diagram,

and proceeded with it to the scene of sport.

“Now, Tom, let me see how far you have profited by our late

conversation. I have some questions to ask you about the action of your

Trap and Ball,” said his father.

“I do not suppose there is much philosophy in the game,” observed Tom.

“Of that we shall judge presently.--Can you tell me the direction which

the ball takes after it flies from the spoon of the Trap, in

consequence of the blow of the bat upon the trigger?”

“It flies upwards, to be sure, and allows me to strike it with my bat,”

answered the boy.

“Very true; but at what angle?--I see you hesitate, look therefore at

the diagram I have prepared, and attend to my explanation of it.”

Mr. Seymour produced the sketch which we here present to our readers.

[Illustration: Sketch of Trap.]

“A B represent the spoon and trigger in their quiescent position. Upon

striking the end B with the bat, they are brought into the position

C D. The spoon will thus have described the small arc A C, when it will

be suddenly stopped by the end of the trigger D coming into contact

with the shoe. The motion of the ball, however, will not be arrested,

and it will consequently be projected forward out of the spoon.”

“Exactly,” exclaimed Louisa, “in the same manner as the shilling flew

off the wine glass, or a person on a galloping horse would be thrown

over the head by its suddenly stopping.”

“I thank you, Louisa; your memory, I perceive, has not suffered from

the drenching you received from the water-cart;[25]--but can you tell

me,” continued Mr. Seymour, “the direction which the ball will take

_after_ its release from the spoon?”

This was a step beyond Louisa’s knowledge, and her father, in order to

assist her, begged her to consider in what direction it was moving

_before_ it left the spoon.

“You have just told us,” said Tom, “that it described an arc, or

portion of a circle.”

“Very well,” said Mr. Seymour; “and did not the philosophy of your

sling teach you that, when a body revolving in a circle is suddenly

disengaged, it will fly off in a right line in the direction in which

it was moving at the instant of its release?--the ball therefore will

describe the tangent C E.”

“It is all clear enough to me now,” said Tom, evidently vexed that he

had overlooked a principle which had been so lately explained to him by

the action of his sling.

“I now see, too,” added Tom, “why the ball seldom flies off at the same

angle in every trap.”

“That,” said his father, “must of course depend upon the extent of the

arc described by the spoon, and which will of course vary in different

traps.”

“Before we conclude the subject, let me ask you whether there is not

some one point in the bat, at which you can most effectually strike the

ball?”

“To be sure,” answered Tom, “in the same way tha there is a point in my

hoop-stick at which I can give the strongest blow--and that point is

termed the _Centre_ of Percussion.”

“Enough,” said Mr. Seymour; “see, here comes the vicar.”

True to the hour appointed, did Mr. Twaddleton make his appearance,

just at the conclusion of the discussion above described; and, as he

approached the party, Louisa observed that he was carrying a canvass

bag in his hand.

“What have you there?” asked Mr. Seymour. “A sack of sugar-plums?”

“No, no; spheres of larger diameter. Here,” said the vicar, as he

opened his bag, “is a foot-ball for you, Tom; and here is a hand-ball

for you, Louisa.” He then presented each of the other children with a

similar present, exclaiming--

‘Nemo ex hoc numero mihi non donatus abibit.’[26]

as Virgil has it.”

“Perhaps,” said Mr. Seymour, “you will enhance the value of this

favour, by giving us an antiquarian history of the ball, which will be

very acceptable to us at this time, as we have just concluded a

philosophical enquiry upon that subject.”

To this request the vicar readily assented, and proceeded as follows:--

“The Greeks appear to have played with four kinds of ball: viz. the

_little ball_, the _great ball_, the _empty ball_ ( σφαιρα κενη ),

which was blown up with air, like our foot-ball, and the _leathern

ball_ ( κωρυκον ), which was suspended from the ceiling, and stuffed

with bran or sand, as those who tossed it were robust or delicate. The

Romans,” continued the vicar, “had also four kinds of _pilæ_, or balls.

The _follis_, a large ball made of leather and blown up with air, like

our foot-ball; the larger kinds of which were struck with the arm, the

smaller ones with the fist. Suetonius tells us that Augustus Cæsar

greatly delighted in the amusement; and in truth it was a glorious

sport, an exercise equally adapted for the young and old; or as Martial

has it,--

‘_Folle_ decet pueros ludere, _folle_ senes.’“[27]

“And yet,” said Mr. Seymour, “neither Horace nor Virgil played at it;

do not you remember the lines in the fifth satire?--

‘Lusum it Mæcenas, dormitum ego Virgiliusque;

Namque pilâ lippis inimicum et ludere crudis.’”[28]

“Many thanks, Mr. Seymour, many thanks for brushing up my recollection;

but I am a little doubtful about the game at which Mæcenas played at

Capua: I have, by-the-by, lately read[29] an account of a peculiar game

of ball for which the city of Sierra is celebrated, and it is supposed

to be that referred to by Horace--‘It is played in the foss, which has

a very high wall, and it is not unlike a tennis-court; the ball is very

large, and appears to be inflated with air; the arm is defended by a

wooden guard or shield; at certain periods of the game, one of the

players runs down a spring-board, and throwing the whole of his weight,

momentum, and strength upon the ball, as it is thrown towards him, he

strikes it to an astonishing distance.’ The second kind of ball,”

continued the vicar, “was termed _trigonalis_, which is conjectured to

have been nearly the same as our tennis-ball. It derived its name from

the position of the three persons who played with it; they were placed

in a triangle, and alternately caught and tossed the ball, and he who

first let it fall to the ground was the loser. The third kind of ball

was the _paganica_, as being much used in country villages. Some

authors state it to have been constructed of leather and stuffed with

feathers, while others conjecture it to have been a large kind of

_follis_. The fourth was the _harpastum_; a small ball, so called

because the gamesters endeavoured to snatch it from each other.”

“It seems,” observed Louisa, “to be a sport better adapted to boys than

girls.”

“In that supposition you are quite mistaken,” replied the vicar; “on

the contrary, the hand-ball would seem to have been originally a female

sport, for Homer has restricted the pastime to the princess and young

maidens of Corcyra; at least, he has not mentioned its ever having been

practised by the men.

‘O’er the green mead, the sporting _virgins_ play,

Their shining veils unbound; along the skies,

Toss’d and re-toss’d, the ball incessant flies.’”[30]

Mr. Seymour said that, as the vicar had satisfied them of the high

antiquity of the ball, he hoped he would now afford them some

information respecting its use in England.

“The game of hand-ball,” said the vicar, “called by the French

_palm-play_, because the exercise consisted originally in receiving the

ball, and driving it back again with the _palm of the hand_, was

formerly a favourite pastime among the youth of both sexes; and in many

parts of the kingdom it was customary for them to play at this game

during the Easter holidays for tansy cakes. In ancient times, the mayor

and aldermen of Newcastle used to go in state at the feasts of Easter

and Whitsuntide, to a little mall of the town, to witness this game. It

was originally played with the naked hand; then with a glove, which in

some instances was lined; afterwards, cords and catgut strings were

bound upon the hand to make the ball rebound more forcibly.”

“That custom,” observed Mr. Seymour, “doubtless, gave origin to the

_racket_.”

“It did,” replied the vicar; “and the places where this game was played

were called _tennis-courts_, and the game itself obtained the name of

_tennis_, from the French word _tenez_[31] (take it, hold it),

frequently used during the exercise. The pastime, I believe, was

introduced amongst our ancestors about the year 1222, the sixth year of

Henry III, by persons of superior rank and family, who erected courts

or oblong edifices for the performance of the exercise.”

“I long to hear something about foot-ball,” exclaimed Tom.

“That is a pastime,” said the vicar, “which was formerly in great vogue

in England, but of late years it has fallen into disrepute. It derives

its name, as you may suppose, from the circumstance of the ball being

driven with the foot, in preference to the hand. When a match is made,

two parties, equal in numbers, take the field, and stand between two

goals, which are placed at the distance of eighty or a hundred yards

from each other. The ball, which is commonly a blown bladder, cased

with leather, is delivered in the midst of the ground, and the object

of either party is to drive it through the goal of their opponents, by

which the game is won. The abilities of the performers are best

displayed in attacking and defending the goals, whence the pastime is

more frequently called a _goal_, than a _game_ at foot-ball. In this

attack and defence, the exercise becomes exceedingly violent; the

players kick each other’s shins without the least ceremony; and this

occasioned James I. to speak of foot-ball as ‘_meeter for laming than

making able the users thereof_.’”

“I believe,” said Mr. Seymour, “that the ancient game of _goff_ is

still much practised in Scotland.”

“It is,” replied the vicar. “In the reign of Edward III. the Latin name

_cambuca_, a crooked club, or staff, was applied to this pastime,

because it was played with such an instrument. The bat was also styled

a _bandy_, from its being bent; and hence the game itself is frequently

called _bandy-ball_.”

“And how is it played?” asked Tom.

“It is played on a smooth common, by driving forward two small hard

balls, with the _bandy_ I have just described, into very distant holes

in the ground, about a foot deep, and nine inches over: and the party

whose ball is driven into these holes with the fewest strokes, is the

victor.”

“But come,” said Mr. Seymour, “it is high time to think of our dinner;

the children must require some refreshment. I am not, my dear vicar,

one of those philosophers who believe that play was invented by the

Lydians[32] as a remedy against hunger; nor do I subscribe to the

opinion of the elder Scriblerus, that it was on such an account wisely

contrived by Nature, that children who have the keenest appetites

should, at the same time, be those who are most addicted to sport.”

“Whether you believe or not that the Lydians invented sports shall not

be a subject of contest between us,” said the reverend antiquary;

“but,” continued he, “one thing is quite certain, that the Lydian games

were at first called _Lydi_ by the Romans; and afterwards, by

corruption, _Ludi_; a presumption I must needs say in favour of the

Lydian claim; but enough of this: to what do you propose we should next

turn our attention? I doubt not you have some new sport for our

recreation as well as our instruction,” added the vicar.

“We will, if you please, attend the children to their _see-saw_, which

the gardener has lately constructed for them,” said Mr. Seymour.

The party accordingly walked to the grove, in which a plank had been

placed across a wooden post: and upon which Tom and John had been

riding for some time in the earlier part of the morning. The boys again

mounted their new hobby; and, after amusing themselves for some

minutes, Mr. Seymour desired them to stop, in order that Tom might

explain the principle upon which the _see-saw_ acted. Tom replied, that

he was not aware of any principle which could apply to riding on a

plank.

“Have I not often told you, my dear boy, that the principles of Natural

Philosophy may be brought to bear on the most trivial acts of life?

Listen, therefore, and you shall find that your present amusement teems

with instruction. You are already well acquainted with the nature and

operations of the centre of gravity; tell me, therefore, whereabouts it

lies in the plank upon which you are riding.”

“I should think,” replied Tom, “that in this instance, the centres of

gravity and magnitude must coincide, or be very nearly in the same

point.”

“The centre of gravity must, as you say, be very nearly in the middle

of the board; and if that be the case, you will allow that, supposing

those who ride upon it are of equal weight, the plank must be supported

in the centre to make the two arms equal; but you and John are of

unequal weight, so that you perceive the plank must be drawn a little

farther over the prop to make the arms unequal; and John, who is the

lightest, must be placed at the extremity of the largest arm. Thus

arranged, you will exactly balance each other; and as each of you, on

your descent, touches the ground with your feet, the reaction affords

you a spring, which destroys the equilibrium, and enables you to

oscillate in arcs about the centre of motion.”

[Illustration: Two children on a see-saw, with circles drawn around

them to show their motion.]

“Do we then describe the arcs of a circle as we ascend and descend?”

“Undoubtedly you must. Look at this diagram,” said Mr. Seymour, “and

you will see at once that the plank can only move round its centre of

motion; for how could you rise, or your brother fall, perpendicularly

in a straight line? You must, in rising, and he, in descending,

describe arcs of your respective circles. It is equally evident that

his velocity must be very superior to yours; for, if you could swing

quite round, you would each complete your respective circles in the

same time.”

“It would really appear so,” said Tom; “and I have myself observed,

that the lighter person has the better ride, as he moves both farther

and quicker, and I now understand the reason of it; it is because being

farther from the centre of motion, he describes a larger arc.”

“The greater velocity with which your little brother moves, renders his

momentum equal to yours. You have the most gravity, he the greatest

velocity; so that, upon the whole, your momenta are equal: for you, no

doubt, remember that momentum is weight multiplied into velocity.[33]

You have here then a striking instance of mechanical advantage gained

by opposing motion to matter, or velocity to weight; for I think you

will readily admit, that without the aid of the plank, your little

brother could never have raised you from the ground.”

“That is clear enough,” said Tom.

“The plank, then, thus arranged,” continued his father, “constitutes

what has been termed a _mechanical power_, to which the name of _lever_

has been given; it is not, however, my intention at present to enter

into the history of these powers, of which there are six distinct

kinds; the one presented to you, in the instance of the _see-saw_, is

perhaps the most simple, and not the least important of them.”

“It is very curious,” observed the vicar, “to reflect upon what a

simple, and apparently trifling fact, the powers of civilized man may

be said to depend. The single truth you have just announced, of making

velocity a compensation for weight, has supplied his weak arm with the

means of controlling the very elements.”(23)

“It is very true,” said Mr. Seymour, “and we might go so far as to say

that, had it been the will of the Almighty Creator of the universe to

have withheld from matter that property which we have been discussing,

man must have remained the most helpless and forlorn of his creatures.

I now propose,” added Mr. Seymour, “to accompany the children to their

swing; the present is a suitable opportunity for giving them some idea

of the doctrine of oscillation, or the theory of the pendulum.”

“Let us proceed, then, to the _Icarian Game_,” exclaimed the vicar.

As the party walked along, Mr. Twaddleton explained the meaning of the

above allusion, with which the reader will be hereafter made

acquainted. The children had commenced the sport, and Mr. Seymour

informed Tom and Louisa, who were attentively watching the motions of

the swing, that its vibrations, like those of the pendulum of a clock,

were produced by its effort to fall, from the force of gravity, and its

power of ascending through an arc similar and opposite to that through

which it has descended, from the momentum acquired during its descent.

“Like the bandilor, I suppose,” said Louisa.

“Exactly, my dear, that is a very good comparison; for as the bandilor,

having descended along the string by its gravity, acquires such a

momentum as to enable it to ascend the same string, and thus, as it

were, to wind itself up; so does the pendulum or swing, during its

descent, acquire a force that carries it up in an opposite arc to an

equal height as that from which it had fallen. But tell me, Tom,

whether you have not discovered that the motion of your new swing

differs from that which you experienced in your former one?”

“The ropes of our present swing are so much longer than those which we

formerly used, that the motion is much pleasanter.”

“Is that all?” said Mr. Seymour. “Have you not observed that you also

swing much slower?”

“I have certainly noticed that,” said Tom.

“It is a law which I am desirous of impressing upon your memory, that

the shorter the pendulum, or swing, the quicker are its motions, and

_vice versâ_; indeed, there is an established proportion between the

velocity and the length, which I shall, hereafter, endeavour to explain

to you. Galileo, the celebrated philosopher, and mathematician to the

Duke of Florence, accordingly proposed a method of ascertaining the

height of the arched ceiling of a church by the vibrations of a lamp

suspended from it. The solution of the problem was founded on the law

to which I have just alluded, viz. that _the squares of the times of

the vibrations are as the lengths_; so that a pendulous body, four

times the length of another, performs vibrations which last twice as

long. Now it is known that, in the latitude of London, a pendulum, if

39 inches and two tenths in length, will vibrate seconds, or make 60

swings in a minute; by observing, therefore, how much the pendulous

body deviates from this standard, we may, by the application of the

above rule, find its length; if the distance from the bottom of the

lamp to the pavement be then measured, which may be done by means of a

stick, and added to the former result, the sum will give the height of

the arch above the pavement: but I will show you the experiment the

next time we go into Overton church; the vicar can tell us the exact

height of the roof, and I will try how nearly I can approach the truth,

by observing with a stop-watch how many seconds one vibration of the

chandelier continues.”

“But, papa, why surely the duration of its vibration must depend upon

the force which you may happen to give to the chandelier?”

“Not in the least; and this brings us at once to the consideration of

the most curious and important fact in the history of the pendulum, and

for a knowledge of which we are also indebted to Galileo.[34] It is

termed _isochronous_[35] property, or that by which all its vibrations,

whether great or small, are performed in exactly the same period of

time; but that you may be better able to comprehend this subject,

attend to the diagram which I have prepared for your instruction.

Suppose that the swing or pendulum A B be raised to C, it will, in

effect, be raised the perpendicular height E C, and in falling will

describe the arc C B; and, in the point B, it will have that velocity

which is acquired by descending through C B, or by a body falling

freely through the perpendicular C E. This velocity will be sufficient

to cause it to ascend through an equal arc B D, to the same height from

whence it fell at C; and since the times of ascent and descent are

equal, it will describe both these arcs in exactly the same space of

time. Having lost all its motion at D, it will again begin to descend

by its own gravity; and in the lowest point B it will acquire the same

velocity as before, which will cause it to reascend to C; and thus, by

ascending and descending, it will perform continual vibrations in the

circumference C B D; and, were it not for the resistance of the air,

and the friction at the centre of motion A, the vibrations would never

cease: but from these obstructions, though small, it happens, that the

velocity of the mass of matter at B is a little diminished in every

vibration; and consequently it does not return precisely to the same

points C or D, but the arcs described continually become shorter and

shorter, till at length they grow insensible; and yet the very same

time is required for the performance of the shorter as the longer arcs;

for, although in the one case the body passes over less space, still

its velocity is proportionally decreased. You perceive, then, that in

an attempt to ascertain the height of a ceiling by the vibrations of a

chandelier, the extent of its swing cannot alter the time which may be

required for its completion. And, if you will place your little brother

in the swing, you will perceive that he will return to your hand in

nearly the same space of time, whether he describes a large or small

arc; although this experiment must be considered as extremely rude,

since there are many disturbing causes for which the theory cannot

possibly make any allowance. I must, moreover, warn you that where the

arc described is very considerable, the difference in the time will be

greater; for, in order to ensure this property of vibrating through

unequal arcs in equal times, it is necessary that the path of the body

should describe a peculiar curve, called a cycloid(24), and not the

segment of a circle; at present, however, it is not possible for us to

enter into this difficult branch of science, although I trust that at

some future period I shall be justified in an attempt to explain it.”

[Illustration: Drawing of a pendulum and its movements.]

Mr. Seymour having concluded his lecture, was about to return to the

Lodge, when Mrs. Seymour approached the party, carrying in her hands a

letter, which the smile on her countenance announced to contain

agreeable intelligence.

“I have just received,” said Mrs. Seymour, “a letter from Miss Villers,

whom you must all remember as a most delightful person. I am informed

that she is about to be married to the nephew of a gentleman who is at

present in our neighbourhood in search of a country residence.”

“Does she mention the gentleman’s name?” inquired the vicar.

“Mr. Henry Beacham,” said Mrs. Seymour.

“The nephew of Major Snapwell, I declare,” exclaimed the delighted

vicar.

The whole party participated in the pleasure which their excellent

friend expressed at this discovery, and Mr. Seymour immediately

accompanied Mr. Twaddleton to Ivy Lodge, to congratulate the major, and

to make such arrangements as might expedite the purchase of Osterley

Park, and the consequent introduction of a family into the

neighbourhood of Overton, from whose society the Seymours anticipated

the highest satisfaction.

At the same time Mrs. Seymour hastened to dispatch a letter to Miss

Villers, in order to solicit her immediate presence at Overton Lodge.

-----

Footnote 25:

See page 65.

Footnote 26:

“Not one amongst you shall depart without a gift from me.” _Æn_. v.

305.

Footnote 27:

Lib. xiv. epig. 43.

Footnote 28:

“Mæcenas goes to tennis, hurtful game

To a weak stomach, and to tender eyes,

So down to sleep with Virgil, Horace lies.”--FRANCIS.

Footnote 29:

“Two Hundred and Nine Days,” or “The Journal of a Traveller on the

Continent,” by Jefferson Hogg: London, 1827.

Footnote 30:

Pope’s Odyssey, lib. v.

Footnote 31:

This etymology has been disputed, and it has been said that the

holding or keeping possession of the ball is no part of the game;

for, during the play, the ball is in continual motion, or passing

from one to another. Others seek the etymology of the name, and the

origin of the game, in a place in France called Tennois; or, by a

change of one letter, Sennois, in the district of Champagne, where

balls were first made, and the game, as it is said, first introduced.

Footnote 32:

Herodotus speaks of the inhabitants of Lydia having successfully had

recourse to gaming as a partial substitute for food, during a famine

of many years’ continuance.

Footnote 33:

See page 61.

Footnote 34:

This discovery was published at Paris, in a treatise called “_L’Usage

du Cadran, ou de l’Horloge Physique Universelle_,” in the year 1639;

from which may be dated the invention of the pendulum.

Footnote 35:

Compounded of the Greek words ισος equal, and χϱονος time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Illustration: Three people looking at a diagram drawn on the ground.]

Philosophy in Sport Made Science in Earnest Being an Attempt to Illustrate the First Principles of Natural Philosophy by the Aid of Popular Toys and Sports · 第 9 / 21 章