CHAPTER II.

_On Gravitation.--Weight.--The Velocity of Falling Bodies.--At what

Altitude a Body would lose its Gravity.--The Tower of

Babel.--The known Velocity of Sound affords the means of

calculating Distances.--An Excursion to Overton Well.--An

Experiment to ascertain its Depth.--A Visit to the

Vicarage.--The Magic Gallery.--Return to the Lodge._

It was about two o’clock, when Mr. Twaddleton, in company with Mr. and

Mrs. Seymour, joined the children on the lawn.

“Tom,” said his father, “are you prepared to commence the proposed

examination?”

“Quite ready, papa.”

“Then you must first inform me,” said Mr. Seymour, taking the ball out

of Rosa’s hand, “why this ball falls to the ground, as soon as I

withdraw from it the support of my hand?”

“Because every _heavy_ body that is not supported, must of course fall.”

“And every _light_ one also, my dear; but that is no answer to my

question; you merely assert the fact, without explaining the reason.”

“Oh! now I understand you; it is owing to the force of gravity; the

earth attracts the ball, and the consequence is, that they both come in

contact;--is not that right?”

“Certainly; but if the earth attract the ball, it is equally true that

the ball must attract the earth; for you have, doubtless, learnt that

bodies mutually attract each other; tell me, therefore, why the earth

should not rise to meet the ball?”

“Because the earth is so much larger and heavier than the ball.”

“It is, doubtless, much larger, and since the force of attraction is in

proportion to the mass, or quantity of matter, you cannot be surprised

at not perceiving the earth rise to meet the ball, the attraction of

the latter being so infinitely small, in comparison with that of the

former, as to render its effect wholly nugatory; but with regard to the

earth being heavier than the ball, what will you say when I tell you

that it has no weight at all?”

“No weight at all!”

Tom begged that his father would explain to him how it could possibly

be that the earth should not possess any weight.

“Weight, my dear boy, you will readily understand, can be nothing more

than an effect arising out of the resisted attraction of a body for the

earth: you have just stated, that all bodies have a tendency to fall,

in consequence of the attraction of gravitation; but if they be

supported, and prevented from approaching the earth, either by the

hand, or any other appropriate means, their tendency will be felt, and

is called _weight_.”

Tom understood this explanation, and observed, that “since attraction

was always in proportion to the quantity of matter, so, of course, a

larger body must be more powerfully attracted, or be _heavier_, than a

smaller one.”

“Magnitude, or size, my dear, has nothing whatever to do with quantity

of matter: will not a small piece of lead weigh more than a large piece

of sponge? In the one case, the particles of matter may be supposed to

be packed in a smaller compass; in the other, there must exist a

greater number of pores or interstices.”

“I understand all you have said,” observed Louisa, “and yet I am unable

to comprehend why the earth cannot be said to have any weight.”

“Cannot you discover,” answered Mr. Seymour, “that, since the earth has

nothing to attract it, it cannot have any attraction to resist, and,

consequently, according to the ordinary acceptation of the term, it

cannot be correctly said to possess weight? although I confess that,

when viewed in relation to the solar system, a question will arise upon

this subject, since it is attracted by the sun.”

The children declared themselves satisfied with this explanation, and

Mr. Seymour proceeded to put another question: “Since,” continued he,

“you now understand the nature of that force by which bodies fall to

the earth, can you tell me the degree of velocity with which they fall?”

Tom asserted that the weight of the body, or its quantity of matter,

and its distance from the surface of the earth, must, in every case,

determine that circumstance; but Mr. Seymour excited his surprise by

saying, that it would not be influenced by either of those conditions;

he informed them, for instance, that a cannon-ball, and a marble, would

fall through the same number of feet in a given time, and that, whether

the experiment were tried from the top of a house, or from the summit

of Saint Paul’s, the same result would be obtained.

“I am quite sure,” exclaimed Tom, “that, in the _Conversations on

Natural Philosophy_, it is positively stated, that _attraction is

always in proportion to the quantity of matter_.”

“Yes,” observed Louisa, “and it is moreover asserted, that the

_attraction diminishes as the distances increase_.”

Mr. Seymour said, that he perceived the error under which his children

laboured, and that he would endeavour to remove it. “You cannot, my

dears,” continued he, “divest your minds of that erroneous but natural

feeling, that a body necessarily falls to the ground without the

exertion of any force: whereas, the greater the quantity of matter, the

greater must be the force exerted to bring it to the earth: for

instance, a substance which weighs a hundred pounds will thus require

just ten times more force than one which only weighs ten pounds; and

hence it must follow, that both will come to the ground at the same

moment; for, although, in the one case, there is ten times more matter,

there is, at the same time, ten times more attraction to overcome its

resistance; for you have already admitted that the force of attraction

is always in proportion to the quantity of matter. Now let us only for

an instant, for the sake merely of argument, suppose that attraction

had been a force acting without any regard to quantity of matter, is it

not evident that, in such a case, the body containing the largest

quantity would be the slowest in falling to the earth?”

“I understand you, papa,” cried Tom: “if an empty waggon travelled four

miles an hour, and were afterwards so loaded as to have its weight

doubled, it could only travel at the rate of two miles in the same

period, provided that in both cases the horses exerted the same

strength.”

“Exactly,” said Mr. Seymour; “and to follow up your illustration, it is

only necessary to state, that Nature, like a considerate master, always

apportions the number of horses to the burthen that is to be moved, so

that her loads, whatever may be their weight, always travel at the same

rate; or, to express the fact in philosophical instead of figurative

language, gravitation, or the force of the earth’s attraction, always

increases as the quantity of matter, and, consequently, that heavy and

light bodies, when dropped together from the same altitude, must come

to the ground at the same instant of time.”

Louisa had listened with great attention to this explanation; and

although she thoroughly understood the argument, yet it appeared to her

at variance with so many facts with which she was acquainted, that she

could not give implicit credence to it.

“I think,” papa, said the archly-smiling girl, “I could overturn this

fine argument by a very simple experiment.”

“Indeed! Miss Sceptic: then pray proceed; and I think we shall find,

that the more strenuously you oppose it, the more powerful it will

become: but let us hear your objections.”

“I shall only,” replied she, “drop a shilling, and a piece of paper,

from my bed-room window upon the lawn, and request that you will

observe which of them reaches the ground first; if I am not much

mistaken, you will find that the coin will strike the earth before the

paper has performed half its journey.”

Tom appeared perplexed, and cast an enquiring look at his father.

“Come,” said Mr. Seymour, “I will perform this experiment myself, and

endeavour to satisfy the doubts of our young sceptic; but I must first

take the opportunity to observe, that I am never better pleased than

when you attempt to raise difficulties in my way, and I hope you will

always express them without reserve.”

“Here, then, is a penny piece; and here,” said Tom, “is a piece of

paper.”

“Which,” continued Mr. Seymour, “we will cut into a corresponding shape

and size.” This having been accomplished, he held the coin in one hand,

and the paper disc in the other, and dropped them at the same instant.

“There! there!” cried Louisa, with an air of triumph; “the coin reached

the ground long before the paper.”

“I allow,” said Mr. Seymour, “that there was a distinct interval in

favour of the penny piece;” and he proceeded to explain the cause of

it. He stated that the result was not contrary to the law of

gravitation, since it arose from the interference of a foreign body,

the air, to the resistance of which it was to be attributed; and he

desired them to consider the particles of a falling body as being under

the influence of two opposing forces,--gravity, and the air’s

resistance. Louisa argued, that the air could only act on the surface

of a body, and as this was equal in both cases (the size of the paper

being exactly the same as that of the penny piece), she could not see

why the resistance of the air should not also be equal in both cases.

“I admit,” said Mr. Seymour, “that the air can only act upon the

surface of a falling body, and this is the very reason of the paper

meeting with more resistance than the coin; for the latter, from its

greater density, must contain many more particles than the paper, and

upon which the air cannot possibly exert any action; whereas almost

every particle of the paper may be said to be exposed to its

resistance, the fall of the latter must therefore be more retarded than

that of the former body.”

At this explanation Louisa’s doubts began to clear off, and they were

ultimately dispelled on Mr. Seymour performing a modification of the

above experiment in the following manner. He placed the disc of paper

in close contact with the upper part of the coin, and, in this

position, dropped them from his hand. They both reached the ground at

the same instant.

“Are you now satisfied, my dear Louisa?” asked her father. “You

perceive that, by placing the paper in contact with the coin, I

skreened it from the action of the air, and the result is surely

conclusive.”

“Many thanks to you, dear papa; I am perfectly satisfied, and shall

feel less confident for the future.” Tom was delighted; for, as he

said, he could now understand why John’s paper _parachute_ descended so

deliberately to the ground; he could also explain why feathers, and

other light bodies, floated in the air. “Well then,” said Mr. Seymour,

“having settled this knotty point, let us proceed to the other

question, viz. ‘that a body will fall with the same velocity, during a

given number of feet, from the ball of St. Paul’s as from the top of a

house.’ You maintain, I believe, that, since the attraction of the

earth for a body diminishes as its distance from it increases,[7] a

substance at a great height ought to fall more slowly than one which is

dropped from a less altitude.”

Neither Tom nor Louisa could think otherwise. Mr. Seymour told them

that, _in theory_, they were perfectly correct, but that, since

attraction acted from the centre, and not from the surface of the

earth, the difference of its force could not be discovered at the small

elevations to which they could have access: “for what,” said he, “can a

few hundred feet be in comparison with four thousand miles, which is

the distance from the centre to the surface of our globe?--You must

therefore perceive that, in all ordinary calculations respecting the

velocity of falling bodies, we may safely exclude such a consideration.”

“But suppose,” said Tom, “it were possible to make the experiment a

thousand miles above the earth, would not the diminished effect of

gravity be discovered in that case?”

“Undoubtedly,” replied his father, “indeed it would be sensible at a

much less distance: for instance, if a lump of lead, weighing a

thousand pounds, were carried up only four miles, it would be found to

have lost two pounds of its weight.” (2)

“This discussion,” observed Mr. Twaddleton, “reminds me of a problem

that was once proposed at Cambridge, to find the elevation to which the

Tower of Babel could have been raised, before the stones would have

entirely lost their gravity.”

“Its solution,” said Mr. Seymour, “would require a consideration which

Tom could not possibly understand at present, viz. the influence of the

_centrifugal force_.”

“I am fully aware of it,” replied the vicar, “and in order to

appreciate that influence, it would, of course, be necessary to take

into account the latitude of the place; but, if my memory serves me, I

think that under the latitude of 30°, which I believe is nearly that of

the plains of Mesopotamia, the height would be somewhere about

twenty-four thousand miles.”

Mr. Seymour now desired Tom to inform him, since all bodies fall with

the _same_ velocity, what that velocity might be.

“Sixteen feet in a second, papa;--I have just remembered that I had a

dispute with a school-fellow upon that subject, and in which, thanks to

Mrs. Marcet, I came off victorious, and won twelve marbles.”

“Then let me tell you, my fine fellow, that unless your answer

exclusively related to the _first_ second of time, you did not win the

marbles fairly; for, since the force of gravity is continually acting,

so is the velocity of a falling body continually increasing, or it has

what is termed an ‘_accelerating velocity_;’ it has accordingly been

ascertained by accurate experiments, that a body descending from a

considerable height falls sixteen feet, as you say, in the _first_

second of time; but _three times sixteen_ in the next; _five times

sixteen_ in the third; and _seven times sixteen_ in the fourth; and so

on, continually increasing according to the odd numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 9,

11, &c. so that you perceive,” continued Mr. Seymour, “by observing the

number of seconds which a stone requires to descend from any height, we

can discover the altitude, or depth, of the place in question.”

Louisa and Fanny, who had been attentively listening to their father’s

explanation, interchanged a smile of satisfaction, and, pulling Tom

towards them, whispered something which was inaudible to the rest of

the party.

“Come, now,” exclaimed Mr. Seymour, “I perceive by your looks that you

have something to ask of me: is Louisa sceptical again?”

“Oh dear no,” replied Tom; “Louisa merely observed, that we might now

be able to find out the depth of the village well, about which we have

all been very curious; for the gardener has told us that it is the

deepest in the kingdom, and was dug more than a hundred years ago.”

Mr. Seymour did not believe that it was the deepest in the kingdom,

although he knew that its depth was considerable; and he said that, if

Mr. Twaddleton had no objection, they should walk to it, and make the

proposed experiment.

“Objection! my dear Mr. Seymour, when do I ever object to afford

pleasure to my little playmates, provided its indulgence be harmless?

Let us proceed at once, and on our return I hope you will favour me

with a visit at the vicarage; I have some antiquities which I am

anxious to exhibit to yourself and Mrs. Seymour.” Tom and Rosa each

took the vicar’s hand, and Mr. and Mrs. Seymour followed with Louisa

and Fanny. The village well was about half a mile distant; the road to

it led through a delightful shady lane, at the top of which stood the

vicarage-house. Mr. and Mrs. Seymour and her daughters had lingered in

their way to collect botanical specimens; and when they had come up to

Tom and the vicar, they found them seated on the trunk of a

newly-felled oak, in deep discourse.

“What interests you, Tom?” said Mr. Seymour, who perceived, by the

enquiring and animated countenance of the boy, that his attention had

been excited by some occurrence.

“I have been watching the woodman,” said Tom, “and have been surprised

that the sound of his hatchet was not heard until some time after he

had struck the tree.”

“And has not Mr. Twaddleton explained to you the reason of it?” asked

Mr. Seymour.

“He has,” replied Tom, “and he tells me that it is owing to sound

travelling so much more slowly than light.”

“You are quite right; and as we are upon an expedition for the purpose

of measuring depths, it may not be amiss to inform you, that this fact

furnishes another method of calculating distances.”

The party seated themselves upon the oak, and Mr. Seymour

proceeded--“The stroke of the axe is seen at the moment the woodman

makes it, on account of the immense velocity with which light

travels;(3) but the noise of the blow will not reach the ear until some

time has elapsed, the period varying, of course, in proportion to the

distance, because sound moves only at the rate of 1142 feet in a

second, or about 13 miles in a minute; so that you perceive, by

observing the time that elapses between the fall of the hatchet and the

sound produced by it, we can ascertain the distance of the object.”

Mr. Seymour fixed his eye attentively on the woodman, and, after a

short pause, declared that he was about half a quarter of a mile

distant.

“Why, how could you discover that?” cried Louisa; “you had not any

watch in your hand.”

“But,” said Mr. Seymour, “you might have perceived that I placed my

finger on my wrist, and as my pulse beats about 75 strokes in a minute,

I was able to form a tolerable estimate of the interval, although I

confess that it is a very rough experiment, but sufficiently accurate

for the purpose of illustration. In the same manner we can readily

ascertain the distance of a thundercloud, or that of a vessel at sea

firing a cannon. If we do not hear the thunder till half a minute after

we see the lightning, we are to conclude the cloud to be at the

distance of six miles and a half. But let us proceed to the well.”

After a walk of a few minutes, the party reached the place of

destination. On their arrival Mr. Seymour enquired who would count the

time.

“Be that office mine,” said Mr. Twaddleton, as he extracted a large

silver time-piece from the dark abyss of his watch-pocket; “and let

Tom,” continued he, “find a pebble.”

“Here is one,” cried Louisa.

“Very well: now, then, how will you proceed?” asked Mr. Seymour.

“I shall drop the stone,” replied Tom, “into the well, and observe how

many seconds it will be before it touches the water, and I shall then

set down the number of feet it will fall in each second, and add up the

numbers.”

“That,” said Mr. Seymour, “would certainly accomplish your object; but

I can give you a neater, as well as a shorter rule for performing the

sum: you shall, however, first work it in your own way;--but you have

not yet informed me how you propose to ascertain the moment at which

the stone reaches the water.”

“By the sound, to be sure, papa; and you will find that a very loud one

will be produced.”

“If the depth of the well be considerable, such a plan will not answer

the purpose, since, in that case, there must necessarily be a

perceptible interval between the fall of the stone and the sound

produced by it, as you have just seen exemplified by the woodman,

which, unless taken into account,(4) will vitiate the result.”

Tom observed that he had not thought of that difficulty, and did not

know how he could get over it. His father told him, that he must look

at the surface of the water, and mark the moment it was disturbed by

the stone.

“Now, Mr. Twaddleton,” exclaimed Mr. Seymour, “are you ready to count

the seconds?”

“Quite ready.”

“Then drop the stone.”

“One,--two,--three,--four--”

“There,” said Tom, “it touched the water.”

“And there, there,” cried several voices, “what a noise it made!”

“_Facilis descensus Averni_,” exclaimed the vicar; “the stone descended

in four seconds.”

“Now, my boy, make your calculation.”

Mr. Seymour furnished pencil and paper, and Tom proceeded;--“_Sixteen_

feet for the first second,--I put that down.”--

“Well,” said his father, “and _three_ times _sixteen_ for the second?”

“_Forty-eight_,” cried Tom.--

“Put it down.”

“_Five times sixteen_, for the third?”

“_Eighty._”--

“Down with it.”

“And _seven times sixteen_, for the fourth?”

“_One hundred and twelve._”

“Now, cast up these numbers,” said Mr. Seymour.

“_Two hundred and fifty-six feet_,” cried Tom, “is the depth of the

well.”

A shout of delight, from the whole juvenile party, announced the

satisfaction which they felt at the success of their first experiment

in NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.

Louisa observed, that she could not distinguish any interval between

the actual contact of the stone with the water and the sound which it

produced.

“At so small a distance as two hundred and fifty-six feet,” said her

father, “the interval could not have exceeded in duration the fourth

part of a second, and was, consequently, imperceptible: we might

therefore, in the present instance, have accepted the sound as a signal

of the stone’s arrival at the water, without prejudice to the result of

the experiment.”

Mr. Seymour told his son, that the method which he had pursued was

unobjectionable when the experiment did not extend beyond a few

seconds: but that, if a case occurred in which a greater space of time

were consumed, he would find his plan tedious: “Now,” continued he, “I

will give you a general rule that will enable you to obtain the answer

in a shorter time without the details of addition. ‘_The spaces

described by a falling body increase as the squares of the times

increase._’ I conclude that you already know that the _square_ of a

number is the sum obtained by multiplying the number into itself.”

“Certainly,” answered Tom; “the square of 4 is 16; that of 3, 9, and so

on.”

“This, then, being the case, you have only to square the number of

seconds, and then multiply that product by 16, being the space

described by the falling body in the first second, and you will have

the required answer: apply this rule to the present case; the stone

fell to the bottom in four seconds; square this number, 4×4=16;

multiply this by 16, and we obtain 256.”

“That,” said Tom, “is certainly much more simple than my method.”

“And it has the advantage,” continued Mr. Seymour, “of being more

portable for the memory.”

“Should any of the villagers observe us,” said Mrs. Seymour, “they will

take us for a party of fortune-tellers.”

“Of fortune-tellers!” repeated Louisa, with surprise.

“Yes, my dear,” replied Mrs. Seymour, “there is a foolish superstition

attached to this, and I believe to many other wells in the

neighbourhood of remote villages, that by dropping pebbles into it, and

observing whether they produce a loud, or only a slight sound, and

noticing the number of times they rebound from the sides before they

reach the bottom, and other absurd distinctions, a person can predict

whether good or evil awaits them.” (5)

Mrs. Seymour now proposed the party’s return to the Lodge; but Mr.

Twaddleton expressed a hope that they would first favour him with a

visit at the vicarage; to which proposition they readily assented.

His antiquated residence, mantled in ivy, and shaded by cypress, stood

on the confines of the church-yard, from which his grounds were merely

separated by a dwarf hedge of sweet-brier and roses; so that the vicar

might be said to reside amidst the graves of his departed parishioners,

and the turf-clad heap evinced the influence of his fostering care by a

grateful return of primroses and violets.

Around the house the reverend antiquary had arranged several precious

relics, which were too cumbrous for admission within its walls; amongst

these was an ancient cross, raised upon a platform on four steps, which

from the worn appearance of the stones had evidently been impressed

with the foot of many a wandering pilgrim. These mouldering monuments

of ancient days cast a shade of solemnity around the dwelling, and

announced its inmate as a person of no ordinary stamp.

Annette, the vicar’s trusty servant, had watched the approach of the

squire and his family, and, anticipating the honour of a passing visit,

was busily engaged in removing the chequed covers from the cumbrous

oaken chairs, and the various other bibs and tuckers with which his

curiosities were invested, when the party entered the study. Lucky was

it for the vicar’s repose, that the notice had been so short, or the

tidy housewife would, without doubt, have scoured some of the antique

commodities, and destroyed a crop of sacred verdure, which ages could

not have replenished. As matters stood, nothing was left for poor

Annette, but to defend her character at the expense of her master, who

she declared treated her as though she was an old witch, whenever she

was seen with a _broom_.

“Why, papa,” exclaimed Tom, as he cast his eyes around the study, “all

these curiosities have been put up since I went to school.”

“The boy is right,” said the vicar; “I have only just completed their

arrangement, and I believe,” continued he, addressing himself to Mr.

Seymour, “that there are several rich morsels of antiquity which you

have not yet seen: but I must, in the first place, introduce my young

friends to the wonders of my magic gallery; wherein they may converse

with the spirits of departed emperors, heroes, patriots, sages, and

beauties;--contemplate, at their leisure, the countenances of the

Alexanders, Cæsars, Pompeys, and Trajans;--behold a legion of

allegorical and airy beings, who have here, for the first time, assumed

appropriate and substantial forms:--examine the models of ancient

temples and triumphal arches, which, although coeval with the edifices

they represent, are as perfect as at the first moment of their

construction, while the originals have long since crumbled into dust.

They shall also see volumes of history, condensed into a space of a few

inches, and read the substance of a hundred pages at a single glance.”

“How extraordinary!” said Tom: “why we never read anything more

wonderful in our Fairy Tales.”

“And what renders it more wonderful,” replied the vicar, “is its being

all true.”

So saying, the antiquary took a key of pigmy dimensions from the pocket

of his waistcoat, and proceeded to a cumbrous ebony cabinet which stood

in a deep recess, and displayed an antique structure, and curiously

carved allegorical devices, in strict unison with that air of mystery

with which the vicar had thought proper to invest its contents. It was

supported by gigantic eagles’ claws; its key-hole was surrounded by

hissing snakes; while the head of Cerberus, which constituted the

handle, appeared as if placed to guard the entrance. The children were

upon the tiptoe of expectation and impatience--the vicar applied the

key with the wonder-stirring exclamation of “OPEN SESAMA!”--the lock

yielded, and the doors flew open. Disappointment and chagrin were

visibly depicted on the countenances of the brother and sisters.

“And so,” exclaimed Tom, “this fine magic gallery turns out to be

nothing more than a box full of rusty halfpence!”

“I am sure,” said Louisa, “it was quite unnecessary to have engaged

Cerberus as a sentinel over such rubbish.”

“Hush!” cried the vicar; “you talk like one not initiated in the

mysteries of enchantment: have you not read, that under its spells the

meanest objects have assumed forms of splendour and magnificence?” [8]

“Like the fabled touch of the Phrygian monarch,” said Mrs. Seymour,

“which we are told transmuted the meanest materials into gold.”

“In like manner, then, may treasures of the greatest value appear to

ordinary eyes as mean and worthless.”

“This cabinet,” continued Mr. Twaddleton, “is under the influence of a

potent magician; by the touch of her wand, it would become irradiated

as with celestial light, and these rusty coins would be transformed

into all those various objects of interest and delight which I had

promised to show you.”

Tom and Louisa looked at the coins, then at the vicar, and afterwards

at Mr. Seymour, to whom they cast an enquiring glance.

“Then pray,” exclaimed Tom, “wave this mighty wand of your enchantress,

and fulfil your promise.”

“The enchantress,” replied the vicar, “is not disposed to grant her

favours to those by whom she has not been propitiated.”

“And what ceremony does she require?” enquired Louisa.

“The perusal of sundry mystic volumes; and the consumption of a

midnight lamp at her altar,” replied the vicar.

“Do you not comprehend the allegory?” said Mr. Seymour. “The enchanted

gallery is no other than a collection of antique medals;--the potent

enchantress, ERUDITION, or that classical learning, without which they

appear of less value than so many rusty halfpence.”

“You are right,” cried Mr. Twaddleton: “the poetical import of a device

can be alone felt and appreciated by those who are acquainted with the

classical subjects to which it alludes; for, as Addison forcibly

observes, there is often as much thought on the reverse of a medal as

in a canto of Spenser; besides, how frequently do you meet with hints

and suggestions in an ancient poet, that give a complete illustration

to the actions, ornaments, and antiquities which are found on

coins!--In short, the person who examines a collection of medals,

without a competent knowledge of the classics, is like him who would

explore a subterranean cavern without the aid of a torch.”

“I have already learned one fact,” said Louisa, “with which I was

certainly unacquainted; that the ancients possessed a much greater

variety of money than modern nations.” (6)

“Of that, my dear,” replied the vicar, “there is some doubt;--the

learned are divided upon the question: some authors maintain that every

medal, and even medallion, had its fixed and regular price in payments,

while others, on the contrary, assert that we are not in the possession

of any real money of the ancients, and that the medals never had any

currency as coins. The truth probably is between these two extremes.”

“If these medals were not used as money,” observed Louisa, “for what

purposes could they have been coined?”

“To perpetuate the memory of great actions; and, faithful to its charge

of fame, the medal has transmitted events, the history of which must,

otherwise, have long since perished. Nay, more,” exclaimed the vicar,

his voice rising as he became warmed by his subject, “the lamp of

history has been often extinguished, and the medalist has collected

sparks from the ashes of antiquity which have rekindled its flame. You

perceive, therefore,” continued the reverend antiquary, “that such

collections are of the highest importance, and if your papa will allow

you to pass a morning in their examination, I shall easily bring you to

admit, that I have not exaggerated the wonders of my magic gallery. I

will convince you, that it contains a series of original miniature

portraits of the greatest heroes of antiquity; a compendious chart of

history, chronology, and heathen mythology; a system of classic

architecture; and an accurate commentary upon the more celebrated poems

of Greece and Rome. Ay, and I will show you a faithful resemblance of

the very ship that carried Æneas to Italy, and of the lofty poop from

which the luckless Palinurus fell into the ocean.”

Mr. Twaddleton then favoured Mr. and Mrs. Seymour with a sight of some

of those rarer medals, which he considered as constituting the gems of

his collection.

“You do not mean to say,” exclaimed Tom, as he seized a small coin,

“that this _brass_ piece is of more value than the large coin of gold

that lies next to it?”

“Mercy upon us!” cried the vicar, in a tone of agony, “how the boy

handles it!--restore it to its place--gently--gently--that ‘little

brass piece,’ as you call it, is gold, and although it might not have

been worth one guinea fifteen hundred years ago, is now valued at a

hundred. It is a coin of Ptolemy the 8th of Egypt. On the obverse is

the portrait of the king beautifully raised; on the reverse a

cornucopia. I do not believe that the coin was known to Pinkerton when

he wrote his Essay.”

“There is, certainly,” said Mr. Seymour, “something very inexplicable

in the tastes and enthusiastic feelings of you patrons of antiquity.”

“The antiquary,” observed the vicar, “does not regard a cabinet of

medals as a treasure of money, but of knowledge; nor does he fancy any

charms in gold, but in the figures that adorn it; it is not the metal,

but the erudition, that stamps it with value.”

Mr. Twaddleton now passed on to a different compartment of his cabinet,

observing, that he must exhibit a few of his Roman treasures. “Behold,”

said he, “two gems of unappreciable value; never do I look upon them

but with feelings of the purest delight. Let my young friends come

nearer, and inspect them minutely. This is a large brass coin of

Tiberius, and was current when Christ was upon the earth; next to it

lies a silver _Denarius_ of the same Emperor; its value was about equal

to seven-pence of our money, and was the coin that tempted Judas to

betray his master.”

“I think,” said Mrs. Seymour, “I have heard you speak of some English

coins of rarity and interest.”

“True, Madam, very true, but they are in another cabinet: before I

close the present one, I will, with your permission, give you a glimpse

at my Sulphurs Paduans, and Beckers.”

“Paduans and Beckers!” exclaimed Mr. Seymour, “and pray what may they

be? I never before heard the terms.”

“‘My poverty but not my will consents,’ The antiquary who is poor in

purse,” observed the vicar, “must needs be contented with being rich in

counterfeits, or, I ought rather to have said, in possessing copies

instead of originals. Becker was an artist of Frankfort, who excelled

in imitating ancient coins, but he never used his skill for the purpose

of deception, but honestly sold his productions as avowed copies, which

are admitted into the cabinets of the curious under the name of

_Beckers_. The _Paduans_,” the vicar added, “derived their name from

two brothers at Padua, celebrated for the accuracy with which they

imitated large Roman coins. Here are the English coins you alluded to,”

said the antiquary to Mrs. Seymour. “This is a shilling of Henry VII.

curious as being the first shilling ever struck; it was presented to me

by a college friend some years ago, and I have been lately informed

that it is so rare as to fetch twenty-five pounds; but let me beg you

to examine attentively this curious little treasure,” said the vicar,

his eyes twinkling with pleasure as he placed the dainty morsel in the

hand of Mrs. Seymour; “it is,” continued he, “a silver groat of Perkin

Warbeck; on one side are the Royal arms, but without a name; they are

surmounted, you perceive, with an arched crown, and placed between a

fleur de lis and a rose.”

“What is the inscription?” asked Mrs. Seymour.

“Say _legend_, Madam, if you please; the words are, ‘_Domine, salvum

fac regem_,’ the date 1494. The coin is supposed to have been struck by

the order of the Duchess of Burgundy for Perkin Warbeck, when he set

out to invade England.”

“Pray,” said Tom, “have you got a Queen Anne’s farthing?”

“It is really curious,” observed the vicar, “that well-informed persons

should still continue to be deceived with regard to the value of this

coin. The absurd notion of its being worth 100_l._ arose from an

advertisement of an old lady, who had lost one, stating it to be one of

the only three known in the world, and worth at least 100_l._ The truth

is, I understand from my much valued friend of Tavistock-Street, that

these farthings generally fetch from five to twenty shillings each;

there are several different types of them, but the only one intended

for currency is that bearing the date of 1714; all the others were

struck as patterns. This is certainly scarce, in consequence of the

death of the Queen taking place before the coinage was finished. The

farthing and sixpence of Oliver Cromwell are much more scarce and

valuable, the one generally brings 10_l._ the other as much as 25_l._

It appears that, after Oliver had stamped his head upon them, he was

afraid to issue them as current coins, which accounts for the few which

have been handed down to us.”

“You remind me,” said Mr. Seymour, “of a story I lately heard of a

crown-piece of Oliver selling at a public auction for as much as two

hundred guineas--can it be possible?”

“You labour under a mistake,” answered the vicar; “the coin you allude

to is known amongst collectors by the name of the Petition crown of

Charles the Second, and it is undoubtedly a most inimitable piece of

workmanship. The story is this: Simon, the artist, had been employed by

Oliver Cromwell, and at the Restoration, in order to obtain the

patronage of Charles, executed the crown-piece in question. It

resembles in its general appearance the common milled five-shilling

piece, but on the edging there are two lines of letters beautifully

executed. The words are ‘_Thomas Simon most humbly prays your Majesty

to compare this his tryal piece with the Dutch, and if more truly drawn

and embossed, more gracefully ordered, and more accurately engraven, to

relieve him_.’”

“And what said Charles to it?” enquired Mrs. Seymour.

“Charles,” said the vicar, “took no notice of him, on account of his

having worked for Cromwell, and the poor artist shortly afterwards died

of a broken heart.”

“Well,” exclaimed Mr. Seymour, “his manes must be surely appeased, if

his crowns now sell for two hundred guineas each.”

The party, soon after this exhibition, quitted the vicarage, highly

gratified, and returned to the Lodge, where, after the usual ceremonies

at the toilet, they sat down to dinner; in the enjoyment of which we

will now leave them, and put an end to the present chapter.

[Illustration: Stone cross.]

-----

Footnote 7:

Gravity, or the tendency of a body to approach the earth, is

proportioned to the _square of the distance_; that is, if a body be

attracted by the earth at a certain distance, with a certain force,

and be afterwards removed to _twice_ the distance, it will now be

attracted, not _half_ us much, but only _one-fourth_ as much as it

was before; and if it be removed to _three_ times the first distance,

it will be attracted not _one-third_ as much, but _one-ninth_, as

much as before; four being the square of two, and nine the square of

three.

Footnote 8:

In the legends of Scottish superstition, the magic power of imposing

upon the eye-sight was termed _Glamour_.

“It had much of glamour might:

Could make a ladye seem a knight;

The cobwebs on a dungeon wall,

Seem tapestry in lordly hall;

A nutshell seem a gilded barge,

A sheeling seem a palace large,

And youth seem age, and age seem youth:--

All was delusion, nought was truth.”

_Lay of the Last Minstrel._--Canto 3. ix.

Philosophy in Sport Made Science in Earnest Being an Attempt to Illustrate the First Principles of Natural Philosophy by the Aid of Popular Toys and Sports · 第 2 / 21 章