WOODCUTS IN ENGLISH PLAYS PRINTED BEFORE 1660[20]

[20] From 'The Library,' by leave of the editor, and Messrs. Kegan

Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co.

When loaves are lacking it seems natural to attach a high value to

crumbs, and perhaps this may be accepted as an excuse for printing the

following rough notes on the few woodcuts which I have been able to find

in editions of English plays printed before 1660. An excuse is needed,

because, while the artistic value of the cuts is distinctly low, the

plays in which they are found, with the exception of Marlowe's 'Dr.

Faustus,' are not of the first interest. On the other hand, as I hope to

show, the woodcuts, as a rule, are not merely fancy pictures used only

because they looked pretty. They are real illustrations, drawn by men

who had certainly read the plays themselves, and in all probability had

seen them. To have had, say, the play-scene from 'Hamlet' drawn, however

rudely, as a title-cut by a contemporary artist would have been a very

pleasant addition to our scanty sources of knowledge as to the

appearance of the actors and the stage when Shakespeare's plays were

first acted, and, though it is less interesting plays which have come

down to us embellished with illustrated title-pages, we may as well take

note of what fortune has given us.

Two at least of the old morality plays, 'Every Man' and 'Hyckscorner,'

are prefaced with cuts, to some of which the names of the characters are

attached on labels, so that we may be sure of their identity.

Unfortunately most of these little figures are poor copies of those used

in a French translation of 'Terence,' published by Antoine Vérard. In

'Hyckscorner' Wynkyn de Worde went farther. To fill up a gap on his

title-page he inserts a picture of an elephant with a howdah on his

back. I have read 'Hyckscorner' once, ten years ago, and I hope never to

have to read it again. But if my memory serves me, there is nothing

about an elephant in it, and this particular elephant agrees so closely

with one used by John of Doesborgh to illustrate a tract about Prester

John's country that I am afraid he was one of Wynkyn de Worde's job

lots. Clearly these earliest cuts throw no light on the contemporary

stage.

The title-cut of 'The pleasant and stately morall of the Three Lordes

and Three Ladies of London,' printed by 'R. Ihones' in 1590, is of more

interest. If I am right in my interpretation of it, it relates not to

the play itself, but to a performance of any morality in a private hall.

On the right is a philosophical-looking person with a wand in his hand,

whom I take to be the 'Doctor' or 'Expositor,' who used to interpret to

the audience the meaning of the old miracle plays and moralities. On the

left is a man in ordinary dress of the sixteenth century, apparently an

actor. Both these are turning their faces to a group of ladies seated on

a dais, presumably as spectators. The picture is thus taken from the

rear of the actors, and illustrates, though in rather a dull and

conventional manner, the performances of a much earlier period than

1590. This is in keeping with the play itself, the 'statelie morall'

being a curious hybrid, half morality, half play, the publication of

which at a date when Shakespeare and Marlowe were already writing for

the stage was a curious anomaly.

[Illustration: FROM 'THE THREE LORDS AND THREE LADIES OF LONDON,' 1590.]

Three other sixteenth-century plays, Marlowe's 'Faustus,' Greene's

'Friar Bacon' and 'Hieronimo,' were issued with title-cuts, but not, I

believe, in the sixteenth century. The edition of 'The Tragicall History

of the Life and Death of Dr. Faustus. Written by Chr. Mar.,' which I

have found thus illustrated is that 'printed for John Wright, and to be

sold at his shop without Newgate at the sign of the Bible, 1616.'

Unfortunately the cut is larger than the page of text, and in the copies

both of this and of later editions, to which I have had access, has

been cropped by the binder's shears beyond any possibility of

reproduction. It shows Faustus, looking rather like some of the least

flattering portraits of Archbishop Laud, standing in a magic circle,

wand in hand, with the devil he has raised squatting before him on his

haunches like a ferocious black poodle.

As in the case of 'Dr. Faustus,' it is difficult to find an uncropped

copy of 'The Honorable Historie of Frier Bacon and Frier Bongay. As it

was lately plaid by the Prince Palatine his servants. Made by Robert

Greene, Master of Arts. (London, Printed by Elizabeth Allde dwelling

neere Christ-Church. 1630.)' In the copy accessible to me only about

three-fourths of the title-page have escaped the horrid shears; but this

suffices to show that we have here one of the few variations from the

dramatist's text of which these illustrators have to be accused. Bacon,

when weariness compels him to leave to his servant the task of watching

the Brazen Head, chides him for slowness in answering his call. 'Think

you,' is the answer, 'that the watching of the Brazen Head craves no

furniture? I warrant you, sir, I have so armed myself that if all your

devils do come I will not fear them an inch.' Unluckily the artist has

dressed the servant not as a fighter, but as a bandsman, with drum and a

kind of fife, and no visible arms. But the Brazen Head is there, and

Bacon very fast asleep, while the labels issuing from the Head's mouth,

'Time was,' 'Time is,' 'Time is Past,' show that the text of the play

had been read, though not very carefully.

The illustration to 'Hieronimo' here shown is taken from the edition

whose title runs: 'The Spanish Tragedie, containing the lamentable end

of Don Horatio and Belimperia: with the pittiful death of old

Hieronimo. (London, Printed by Augustine Mathewes, and are to bee sold

by Iohn Grismand at his shop in Pauls Alley.)' The original cut is very

'mealy' (a characteristic quite successfully reproduced in the

accompanying facsimile of it), and the design has not many artistic

merits; but in point of faithfulness it is probably all that could be

desired. It will be remembered that as Horatio and Belimperia are toying

in an arbour in Hieronimo's garden, the lady hears footsteps. 'Lorenzo,

Balthazar, Cerberim, and Pedringano enter, disguised.' Lorenzo, the

jealous brother, bids his minions 'Quickly despatch, my Masters,' and

according to the stage direction, 'they hang him in the Arbour' (_i.e._,

Horatio, not Lorenzo), and, despite Belimperia's entreaties, stab him to

death.

[Illustration: FROM THE 'SPANISH TRAGEDIE']

'Murder, murder, help, Hieronimo, help!' cries Belimperia, as in the

picture, and though at Lorenzo's bidding, 'Come stop her mouth; away

with her,' she is dragged off, the old man hears. The stage direction,

'Enter Hieronimo in his shirt,' has been interpreted liberally, for

Hieronimo has nether garments in addition; but he is duly coatless and

provided with a torch with which to see the 'murdrous spectacle.'

'_Hier._ What outcry calls me from my naked bed,

And chills my throbbing heart with trembling fear,

Which never danger yet could daunt before?

Who calls Hieronimo? speak, here I am.

I did not slumber; therefore 'twas no dream.

No, no; it was some woman cried for help.

And here within the garden did she cry,

And in this garden must I rescue her.

But stay, what murdrous spectacle is this?

A man hang'd up, and all the Murderers gone;

And in my Bower, to lay the guilt on me?

This place was made for pleasure, not for death:

[_He cuts him down._

These garments that he wears I oft have seen:

Alas, it is Horatio, my sweet son!'----

and so he makes his discovery and devotes himself henceforth to revenge.

The labels issuing from the actors' mouths show that the artist had

studied his text, and I cannot resist remarking on how admirably he has

caught the pose of the straw dummy, which must have been left hanging to

personate Horatio, in place of the actor, who had doubtless slipped

behind the arbour during the scuffle and was now resting after his

exertions.

Of plays first acted in the seventeenth century which have woodcuts, the

earliest is probably, 'If you know not me, you know nobodie: Or the

troubles of Queene Elizabeth. Printed for Nathaniel Butter, 1606.' To

render the 'me' emphatic there is a portrait of Queen Bess seated in a

chair of state, crowned, and with ball and sceptre in her hands. It is

carefully drawn and cut, and no doubt represents the 'make up' which the

actors followed. Seven years later the same publisher similarly

embellished another chronicle play, 'When you see me you know me, or the

famous Chronicle Historie of King Henrie the Eight, with the birth and

vertuous life of Edward Prince of Wales. As it was played by the high

and mightie Prince of Wales his servants. By Samuel Rowly, servant to

the Prince. (At London, Printed for Nathaniel Butter, and are to be sold

at his shop in Paules churchyard near S. Austines Gate. 1613.)' In the

cut Henry VIII., in his familiar attitude, is standing enveloped in

curtains, rather like a stage manager who has come to the 'front' to

address the audience.

But for our purpose kings and queens copied from familiar portraits are

less important than persons of a much humbler rank, and more interesting

than either of the two illustrations just described is that of the

heroine from 'The Roaring Girls or Moll Cut-Purse. As it hath lately

beene acted on the Fortune Stage by the Prince his Players. Written by

G. Middleton and P. Dekkar. (Printed at London for Thomas Archer.

1611.)' Moll Cut-Purse was a real person, of whom, as Mary Frith, a

judicial account from the pen of Mr. A. H. Bullen will be found in the

'Dictionary of National Biography.' In the play she frightens a father

into allowing his son to marry another Mary by persuading him that it is

she herself of whom the young man is enamoured. She is credited with

'the spirit of foure great parishes and a voyce that will drown all the

citty,' but the cowardly Laxton, whom she fights, mistakes her in her

male attire for a young barrister, and perhaps the Temple produced many

rufflers not unlike the figure here shown. Mary Frith herself seems to

have had few good qualities, but Moll in the play is an amiable giant,

and her promise to her servant of the reversion of her man's clothes

'next week' was probably made in order to persuade the spectators that

this masquerading was only an isolated freak.

[Illustration: MOLL CUT-PURSE]

[Illustration: GREENE'S 'TU QUOQUE']

No less interesting than this, and artistically the best picture we have

to show, is the title-cut of 'Greene's Tu Quoque or the Cittie Gallant,

as it hath beene divers times acted by the Queenes Maiesties servants.

Written by Jo. Cooke, Gent. (Printed at London for John Trundle. 1614.)'

Originally known as 'The Cittie Gallant,' this play was renamed after

Thomas Green, the actor who so successfully personated 'Bubble,' to

whom the 'Tu Quoque' quip is assigned.

Bubble is the type of the foolish young gentleman who wants to know 'the

lowest price of being italianated.' No doubt this excellent cut is a

portrait of Green in the part as he enters 'gallanted,' and exclaims:

'How apparel makes a man respected, the very children in the streets do

adore me; for if a boy that is throwing at his jackalent chance to hit

me on the shins, why I say nothing but _Tu quoque_, smile and forgive

the child with a beck of my hand or some such like token: so by that

means I do seldom go without broken shins.'

[Illustration: FROM 'THE MAIDS TRAGEDIE']

In contrast to these portraits of single characters is the title-cut of

'The Maids Tragedie, as it hath beene diuers times acted at the

Black-Friers by the Kings Maiesties Seruants. Newly perused, augmented

and inlarged, this second Impression. (London, Printed for Francis

Constable, and are to be sold at the White Lion in Pauls Church-yard,

1622.)' Here we have depicted the chief incident of the play, the fight

which Aspatia, in man's clothes, forces upon Amintor in order to end her

life at his hand. The drawing is a little rude, but, as will be seen

from the following quotation, the attitude of Aspatia is strictly in

accordance with the text.

'_Aspatia._ You must be urged, I do not deal uncivilly

With those that dare to fight, but such as you

Must be used thus. [_She strikes him._

_Amintor._ I prithee, youth, take heed.

Thy sister is a thing to me so much

Above mine honour that I can endure

All this--good gods!--a blow I can endure,

But stay not, lest thou draw a timeless death

Upon thy self.

_Aspatia._ Thou art some prating fellow,

One that has studied out a trick to talk

And move soft-hearted people; to be kickt, [_She kicks him._

Thus to be kickt--[_aside_] Why should he be so slow

In giving me my death?

_Amintor._ A man can bear

No more and keep his flesh. Forgive me then,

I would endure yet, if I could. Now show

The spirit thou pretendest, and understand

Thou hast no hour to live. [_They fight._

What dost thou mean? Thou canst not fight.

The blows thou mak'st at me are quite besides,

And those I offer at thee, thou spread'st thine arms

And tak'st upon thy breast, alas, defenceless!

_Aspatia._ I have got enough,

And my desire. There is no place so fit

For me to die as here.'

The fight, it will be observed, is akin to that between David Balfour

and Alan Breck in Stevenson's 'Kidnapped,' but here the spectators' pity

is more keenly worked on by the inexpert challenger being a woman and

by the more tragical termination of the combat. As for the artist, no

doubt he did his best.

In Beaumont and Fletcher's 'A King and No King,' printed by T. Walkley

in 1619, the title-page shows a well-drawn figure of a man, above whose

head, half on, half off it, a crown is held by an arm from the sky. In

'Swetnam the Woman-hater, arraigned by women,' printed for Richard

Meighen the next year, a fairly good cut, which I regret to have

remembered too late to have reproduced, exhibits Swetnam formally tried

at bar, before a judge and jury of women.

[Illustration: THE FAIR MAID OF THE WEST]

Our next picture is from 'The Fair Maid of the West, or, a Girle Worth

Gold. The first part. As it was lately acted before the King and Queen,

with approved liking, by the Queens Majesties Comedians. Written by T.

H. (London, Printed for Richard Royston, and are to be sold at his Shop

in Ivie Lane. 1631.)' The cut, of course, represents the 'girl worth

gold,' and leaves one wondering whether the man who took the part was

really able to screw his waist to the fashionable limit here shown.

In 'The Iron Age: Contayning the Rape of Hellen: The siege of Troy: The

Combate betwixt Hector and Aiax: Hector and Troilus slayne by Achilles:

Achilles slaine by Paris: Aiax and Vlisses contend for the Armour of

Achilles: The Death of Aiax, etc. Written by Thomas Heywood,' we have a

very pictorial title-page, which duly answers to the stage direction:

'Alarum. In this combat, both having lost their swords and shields,

Hector takes up a great piece of a rock and casts at Aiax, who tears a

young tree up by the roots, and assails Hector; at which they are parted

by both armies.'

In 'The Second Part' (N. Okes, 1632) the title-cut shows Troy in flames,

the Greeks issuing from the wooden horse, and in the foreground Sinon

and Thersites engaged in a most conventional stage dialogue. The actual

greeting of these heroes is in contrast with the earnest mien the artist

has given them; for Thersites hails Sinon as 'My Urchin,' and Sinon

hails Thersites as 'My Toad.' But these epithets had no doubt a hidden

meaning.

Our next illustration is from 'The Foure Prentises of London, With the

Conquest of Jerusalem. As it hath beene diuers times acted at the

Red-Bull, by the Queene's Maiestie's Seruants with good applause.

Written and newly reuised by Thomas Heywood. (Printed at London by

Nicholas Okes, 1632.)'

On the whole, I am inclined to think that the picture merely represents

the jovial dance of the apprentices, either when their labours are over,

or when, after the proclamation for the Crusades, they hold this

colloquy:

'_Eustace._ Ran, tan, tan.

Now by S. George he tells us gallant newes.

I'll home no more. I'll run away to-night.

_Guy._ If I cast bowl, or spoon, or salt again,

Before I have beheld Jerusalem

Let me turn Pagan.

_Charles._ Hats and caps, adieu;

For I must leave you, if the Drum say true.

_Godfrey._ Nay, then, have with you, brothers! for my spirit

With as much vigour hath burst forth as thine,

And can as hardly be restrain'd as yours.

Give me your hands. I will consort you too:

Let's try what London Prentices can do!

_Eustace._ For my Trades sake, if good success I have

The grocers arms shall in my ensign wave.

_Guy._ And if my valour bring me to command

The Goldsmiths' arms shall in my colours stand.

_Godfrey._ So of us all. Then let us in one fleet

Launch all together.'

These are brave words, and the coats of arms hung over the 'prentices'

heads are in accordance with them. But there is a stage direction later

on in the play: 'Alarum. The four brethren each of them kill a Pagan

king, take off their crowns and exeunt, two one way and two another

way'; and I cannot but regret that the artist did not choose this as the

subject of his cut.

[Illustration: THE FOUR PRENTISES OF LONDON]

In 1655 'The Merry Devil of Edmonton' appeared from the press of D.

Gilbertson with a title-cut showing Banks and his famous horse on a

platform. Our last illustration is taken, not from this, but from

another Edmonton play, 'The Witch of Edmonton, a known true story.

Composed into a tragi-comedy by divers well-esteemed Poets; William

Rowley, Thomas Dekker, John Ford, etc. Acted by the Princes Servants,

often at the Cock-Pit in Drury-Lane, once at Court, with singular

Applause. Never printed till now. (London, Printed by J. Cottrel, for

Edward Blackmore, at the Angel in Paul's Churchyard. 1658.)'

[Illustration: FROM 'THE WITCH OF EDMONTON']

The illustration in this case is a composite one, referring to three

different moments in the play. Mother Sawyer is found by the dog--said

dog, of course, being 'a Familiar'--cursing 'that curmudgeon Banks,'

the 'clown' of the piece, who, with three of his companions, has been

abusing her. A long speech of imprecation ends with the effective line:

'Vengeance, shame, ruin, light upon that Canker,'

and it is then that there appears the stage direction, 'Enter Dog,' his

opening remark being the 'Ho! have I found thee cursing? now thou art

mine own,' of which part is shown on the label. The dog subsequently

explains that it is only when he finds people cursing that he can obtain

powers over them of life and death, but before owning to this limitation

he has rather unfairly got the old woman to seal the usual covenant with

her blood, and instructed her in the art of making herself unpleasant.

'I'll tell thee, when thou wishest ill;

Corn, Man or Beast, would spoyl or kill,

Turn thy back against the Sun,

And mumble this short Orison:

_If thou to death or shame pursue 'em

Sanctibicetur nomen tuum.'_

In a subsequent scene the Spirit takes the form of Katherine Carter,

with whom Cuddy Banks is in love. On her appearing to him he remarks

that he will teach her to walk so late! The teaching, however, was not

on his side. She trips before him, and his exclamation as he quits the

stage, 'Nay, by your leave I must embrace you,' is speedily followed by

that quoted in the cut, 'Oh help, help, I am drown'd. I am drown'd.' The

stage direction hereupon is 'Enter Wet,' and the dog, after four

diabolic 'ha ha's,' bids him 'Take heed how thou trustest the Devil

another time!' The tumbling into the water, it will be observed, like

the murder of her children by Medea, was enacted behind the stage,

probably because on the stage there was no means of simulating water to

tumble into. In this case, therefore, the artist, a very rude one, it

must be confessed, not only brought three scenes together, but depicted

one which the audience could not have witnessed.

Our subject has been limited to woodcuts in old plays, but it should be

noted that both the undated editions of Middleton's 'Game of Chess' have

engraved title-pages of some merit. As for our woodcuts, I have tried to

resist the temptation to claim for them more than they deserve. One or

two of them are really good, several others at least interesting, a few,

like that at which we have just been looking, poor stuff enough. But

they are connected with the greatest period of the English drama, and it

has been worth while to collect these notes, if only to show that this

is the best that English artists could do, or English publishers had the

enterprise to commission them to do, when they were confronted with so

unique an opportunity.

Old Picture Books, With Other Essays on Bookish Subjects · 第 21 / 32 题