THE PROFITS OF THE PERCY MEMOIR.

The original design of Bishop Percy in undertaking the _Memoir_ of his

friend Goldsmith was to benefit Maurice. Then Catherine, daughter of

Henry, was added as a participant in the assumed profits: afterwards

(when Maurice died and Charles revealed himself) Charles Goldsmith,

the sole then remaining brother of Oliver. Percy’s ultimate decision,

when the work took shape and he had made his agreement with Cadell

and Davies in 1797, was for 125 of the 250 free copies of the work

given to him by Cadell and Davies for disposal to be sold through

White the bookseller of Fleet Street for the benefit of Charles, and

the remaining 125 copies to be sold through Archer the bookseller of

Dublin for the benefit of Catherine, daughter of the Revd. Henry. The

London copies seem to have gone off fairly well. Percy in a Memorandum

dated Dromore, 24 May, 1808, explaining the affair long after the

event to Dr. R. Anderson (_Literary Illustrations_, VII, 189-192),

says that from Charles “the Bishop frequently heard, informing him

that the payments were duly made, and whatever copies he desired were

delivered to him to dispose of among his friends for his own benefit.

He believes Mr. Charles Goldsmith is since dead, but the account is

still open with his family, to whom Mr. White must account for any that

may have remained of the 125 copies delivered to him.” The case of the

125 Irish copies was less satisfactory. “It was principally on account

of Catherine Goldsmith, who had been reduced to indigence, that the

Bishop had applied in 1800 to Messrs. Cadell and Davies to afford some

present relief, to alleviate the distress occasioned by the delay of

the publication: which being refused by them, the Bishop had supplied

the same himself, and continued to do so till her death, which took

place before Mr. Archer had come to a settlement for the 125 copies

transmitted to him. Part of these are still unsold.... Whatever arises

from this sale, or remains of Mr. Archer’s balance that was unpaid to

or for the niece, shall be delivered to any relative of Dr. Goldsmith

who shall be found a proper object of the same.” (Nichols’ _Literary

Illustrations_, VII, 191.)

[Illustration]

The Family Letters of Oliver Goldsmith A Paper Read Before the Bibliographical Society, October 15th, 1917 · 第 24 / 26 题