CHAPTER II

AULD REEKIE

“Auld Reekie,” as it is fondly called, still raises its smokiest

chimneys and most weathered walls along the “hoary ridge of ancient

town” that culminates in the Castle Rock, looking across a long central

line of gardens to the farther swell of land on which stands the New

Town of Scott’s day. But New Town now seems a misnomer, since the

cramped site of the old city, itself much sweetened and aerated by

innovations, is surrounded by newer towns expanding in other directions.

Southwards, of late years, Edinburgh has grown more rapidly up to the

foot of the hills that here edge the suburbs of Newington, Grange, and

Morningside. Westwards she spreads out towards Corstorphine Hill and

Craiglockhart. On the east her progress is barred by the mass of

Arthur’s Seat, but round the base of this creep rows of tall houses that

will soon connect her with Portobello, that minor Margate of the

capital, now comprised within her municipal boundaries. Northwards, she

goes on “flinging her white arms to the sea,” which she almost touches

at Granton and Trinity; and a long unlovely street leads to the Piræus

of this modern Athens, Leith, still stiffly standing aloof in civic

independence. Including Leith, which refuses to be included, the

Scottish metropolis began the century with a population not far short of

400,000.

On high in the midst of these modern settings, the charms of Old

Edinburgh are thrown into becoming relief, as the medley smartness of

Princes Street is enhanced by its facing the grim backs of the High

Street “lands.” Ruskin and other critics have said hard things of the

New Town’s architects; but their strictures do not go without question.

What, at all events, must strike strangers is an imposing solidity of

the modern buildings, whether tall “stairs”--_Anglicé_ flats--or roomy

private houses, nearly all built of a grey stone that seems in keeping

with the atmosphere; and this not only in the central streets and

squares, but in outer suburbs, innocent of brick and stucco. If a too

classical regularity has been aimed at, this is tempered by the

unevenness of the ground, breaking up the “draughty parallelograms,”

giving vistas into the open country, and at night such long panoramas of

glittering lights displayed on slopes and crests. The place, says R. L.

Stevenson, who has so well caught the picturesque points of his native

city, “is full of theatre tricks in the way of scenery.... You turn a

corner, and there is the sun going down into the Highland hills. You

look down an alley, and see ships tacking for the Baltic.” And if the

city fathers have been ill advised in the past, its municipality may

claim the credit of being first in the kingdom to take powers for

disinfecting it against the plague of mendacious and hideous

advertisements that are too much allowed to pock our highways and

byways.

[Illustration: EDINBURGH FROM “REST AND BE THANKFUL”]

A peculiar feature of the city is its “Bridges,” by which certain

streets span others at different levels, physically and socially. From

the unique Dean Bridge, in the heart of the West End, one overlooks what

might be taken for a Highland glen but for the lines of mansions that

edge it above. When I came to Edinburgh as a homesick little schoolboy,

appalled by the “boundless continuity” of street, I devoted my first

Saturday freedom to an attempt at discovering the open country. This was

happily before the days of schoolboys being driven and drilled to play.

Striking the Water of Leith at Stockbridge, I turned along the path

leading into this glen that might well satisfy desires for a green

solitude. But on reaching the village of Dean, embedded below the

bridge, I climbed up to find myself beside the dome of St. George’s

Church, lost deeper than ever in that bewildering city. Still, a little

trimmed and tamed, an oasis of wooded bank shuts in the rushing stream,

now purified and stocked with trout, where we were content to catch

loaches and sticklebacks.

What a loss to this city was the classically-minded Gothicism or

carelessness through which came to be rooted up so many noble trees that

once dotted the parks of Drumsheugh and Bellevue! But Edinburgh has been

well endowed afresh with open spaces and shrubberies, those that

separate the blocks of the New Town mainly private joint-stock

paradises, yet serving for public amenity. The Old Town is enclosed

between the noble stretch of the Princes Street Gardens on the north,

and on the south the open Meadows, with its “Philosopher’s Walk” of

Dugald Stewart’s and Playfair’s days, rising into the Bruntsfield Links.

Then the city is almost ringed about by parks, more than one of them

including grand features of natural scenery. Philadelphia is the only

city I know which has such wild scenes at her very doors, in her case

collected together in the Fairmount Park, where miles of hill and river

landscape have been left almost untouched among the streets and suburbs,

yet boasting no points so noble as the head of Arthur’s Seat, with its

girdle of crags, screes, and lakes.

This miniature Ben, imposing as it looks, is under 1000 feet high, and

easily climbed. Those almost past their climbing days may seek Blackford

Hill on the south side, where Scott tells us that he bird’s-nested as a

truant boy, and speaks of it as at a later day brought under

cultivation; but it has relapsed again to its native wildness, laid out

as a rough park and as site for the squat domes of the new Observatory.

From this eminence one gets Marmion’s view of the city, now grown up to

its foot, shut in between Arthur’s Seat and the wooded ridge of

Corstorphine, and bounded to the north across the Firth by the heights

of Fife, above which, in clear weather, stand up the blue bastions of

the Highlands. Behind Blackford, one may keep up the wooded hollow of

the Hermitage, by a public path following the stream, and thus gain the

Braid Hills, overlooking the city a little farther back. Keeping along

their edge, at some risk from flying golf balls, one can hold on to the

hotel built between the old and the new south roads. Here, at the

terminus of suburban trams, looking to the Pentlands up the valley of

the Braid Burn, by which runs a field path towards Swanston, the country

home of R. L. Stevenson, one might hardly guess oneself so near a great

city, but for the lordly poorhouse and fever-hospital buildings to the

back of Craiglockhart Hill.

In the very heart of the city are view-points fine enough to content

hasty travellers, from the battlements of the Castle, from the spire of

Scott’s Monument, from the slopes of the Calton Hill, with its array of

ready-made ruins and monuments with which Edinburgh has sought to live

up to her classical pretensions. This rises beyond the east end of

Princes Street, opposite the battlemented gaol, and a little way past

that Charing Cross of Auld Reekie, where its main ways meet between the

Post Office, the Register House and the tower of a new North British

Hotel looking down upon the glass roofs of the sunken Waverley Station.

At the other end of Princes Street, an opening before the Caledonian

Station may be called Edinburgh’s Piccadilly Circus, radiating into its

Mayfair quarter. This end is dominated by the Castle, suggesting to

Algerian travellers a duodecimo edition of that wonderful rock-set city

Constantine. It shows little of the modern fortress, rather a pile of

ugly barracks which a Japanese cruiser could knock to pieces from the

Firth; but one understands how in old days its site made it a Gibraltar

citadel, that often could hold out when the town was overrun by foemen

taking care to keep themselves beyond range of the Castle guns. Taylor,

the Water Poet, who had seen something of war in his youth, judged it

“so strongly grounded, bounded, and founded, that by force of man it can

never be confounded.” The King himself did not gain admittance on his

recent visit without a ceremony of summons by the Lord Lyon King of

Arms; but all and sundry, at reasonable hours, may stroll across its

drawbridge to lounge on the ramparts, to be conducted over historic

relics by veteran ciceroni, or to wait for the stunning report of the

gun, which, fired from Greenwich at one o’clock, brings every watch

within hearing to the test.

From this “Maiden Castle,” safe refuge for princesses of the good old

times, a conscientious tourist makes for Holyrood by the long line of

High Street and Canongate, bringing him past most of the historic sites

and monuments--the “Heart of Midlothian,” the Parliament House, the

swept and garnished Cathedral of St. Giles, beside which John Knox now

lies literally buried in a highway, as was Dr. Johnson’s pious wish for

him; the restored Market Cross, the Tron Church, Knox’s House, which

counts rather among Edinburgh’s Apocrypha, and many another ancient

mansion, once alive with Scotland’s proudest names, now degraded to an

Alsatia of huge dingy tenements, swarming forth vice and misery at

nightfall. The way narrows through an unsavoury slum as it approaches

the deserted home of kings, beyond which opens a park such as no king

has at his back door.

Holyrood was originally an abbey, founded by David I. “in gratitude,”

says the legend, “for his miraculous deliverance from a stag on Holy

Rood Day, and prompted thereto by a dream.” Similar stories are told of

many another prince less disposed to ecclesiastical benefactions than

David, that “sair saint to the crown”; even John of England founded one

abbey, at Beaulieu, as an act of grace prompted by nightmare visions.

Beside David’s Abbey of the Holy Cross sprang up a palace that, as well

the sacred precincts, suffered much in the troubles of the Stuart

reigns, being frequently burned or spoiled by

[Illustration: EDINBURGH FROM SALISBURY CRAGS--EVENING]

English tourists of their period, on the last occasion “personally

conducted” by one Oliver Cromwell, who had small respect either for

palaces or abbeys. In Charles II.’s time it was rebuilt somewhat after

the style of Hampton Court, while the Abbey, devastated by a

Presbyterian mob, came to be refitted with a too heavy roof that crushed

it into utter ruin. The present building is thus modern, but for the

ruins behind, and the restored portion incorporating Queen Mary’s

apartments. The name of the Sanctuary opposite was no vain one up till

about half a century ago, when impecunious debtors used to take asylum

within its bounds, privileged to issue free on Sundays, else venturing

forth to feast or sport only at the risk of thrilling adventures with

bailiffs.

Everyone who has been to Edinburgh knows the sights of this show place:

the portraits of Scottish kings, more or less mythical, “awful examples”

as works of art, the whole gallery, it is said, done by a Dutch painter

of the seventeenth century for a lump sum of £250; the tapestried rooms

of Darnley; the Queen’s bedchamber; and the dark stain on the flooring

where Rizzio is believed to have gasped out his life, after being

dragged from the side of his mistress. Every reader must know Scott’s

story of the traveller in some patent fluid for removing stains, who

pressed the use of his nostrum on the horrified custodian. What every

stranger does not know is how this “virtuous palace where no monarch

dwells” is still used for functions of state. Annually, in May, the Lord

High Commissioner takes up his quarters here as representative of the

Crown in the General Assembly of the Church, when green peas ought to

come into season to make their first appearance on the quasi-royal

table. Ireland, that makes such loud boast of her grievances, basks in

the smiles of a Lord-Lieutenant all the year, while poor patient

Scotland has a blink of reflected royalty for one scrimp fortnight,

during which the old palace wakes to the life of _levèes_, drawingrooms,

and dinners, where black gowns and coats are more in evidence than in

most courtly circles. The Commissioner’s procession from the palace to

open the Assembly lights up the old Canongate with a martial display;

and more or less festivity is held within the walls according to the

wealth or liberality of the Commissioner, who, like the Lord Mayor of

London, should be a rich man to fill his office with due _éclat_. But

when King Edward VII. recently visited Edinburgh, to the regret of the

citizens, he did not take up his quarters in the palace, pronounced

unsuitable by the prosaic reason of its drains being somewhat too

Georgian, a matter that has now been amended.

A more occasional function fitly transacted here is the election of

representative peers for Scotland in a new parliament. As every

schoolboy ought to know, our Constitution admits only sixteen Scottish

peers to sit in Parliament, most of them indeed having place there in

virtue of British peerages--the Duke of Atholl as Lord Strange, for

instance, the Duke of Montrose as Lord Graham, and so forth. Of those

left out in the cold, sixteen are “elected” by a somewhat cut-and-dried

process very free from the heat and excitement of popular voting. As I

have seen it, the ceremony seemed to lack impressiveness. Some dozen

gentlemen in pot hats and shooting jackets assembled in the Picture

Gallery before an audience chiefly consisting of ladies, more than one

of these legislators in mien and appearance suggesting what Fielding

says about Joseph Andrews, that he might have been taken for a nobleman

by one who had not seen many noblemen. Each of the privileged order, in

turn, wrote and read out a list of the peers for whom he voted, usually

ending “and myself.” Certain practically-minded peers sent in their

votes by post. The most moving incident was the expected one of an

advocate in wig and gown rising to put in for a client some unrecognised

claim to a title or protest as to precedency, duly listened to and noted

down. The whole ceremony struck one as rather a waste of time; but

perhaps the same might be said of most ceremonies. One thing has to be

remembered about these unimposing lords, that they are a highly select

body in point of blue blood, all representing old families, as the fount

of their honour was dried up at the Union, and the king can make an

honest man as soon as a Scottish peer.

The tourist who comes in for any of such functions will realise the

truth of what R. L. Stevenson says for his native city:--

“There is a spark among the embers; from time to time the old

volcano smokes. Edinburgh has but partly abdicated, and still

wears, in parody, her metropolitan trappings. Half a capital and

half a country town, the whole city leads a double existence; it

has long trances of the one and flashes of the other; like the king

of the Black Isles, it is half alive and half a monumental marble.

There are armed men and cannon in the citadel overhead; you may see

the troops marshalled on the high parade; and at night after the

early winter evenfall, and in the morning before the laggard winter

dawn, the wind carries abroad over Edinburgh the sound of drums and

bugles. Grave judges sit bewigged in what was once the scene of

imperial deliberations. Close by in the High Street perhaps the

trumpets may sound about the stroke of noon; and you see a troop of

citizens in tawdry masquerade; tabard above, heather-mixture

trowser below, and the men themselves trudging in the mud among

unsympathetic bystanders. The grooms of a well-appointed circus

tread the streets with a better presence. And yet these are the

Heralds and Pursuivants of Scotland, who are about to proclaim a

new law of the United Kingdom before two-score boys, and thieves,

and hackney-coachmen.”

Tourists are too much in the way of seeing no more of Edinburgh than its

historic lions and rich museums, as indicated in the guide-books. I

would invite them to pay more attention to the suburbs straggling on

three sides into such fine hill scenery as is the environment of this

city. Open cabs are easily to be had in the chief thoroughfares; and

Edinburgh cabmen have the name of being rarely decent and civil, as if

the Shorter Catechism made an antidote to the human demoralisation

spread from that honest friend of man, the horse. Give a London Jehu

something over his fare, and his first thought seems to be that you are

a person to be imposed upon; but I, for one, never had the same

experience here. I know of a stranger who took a cheaper mode of finding

his way through Edinburgh; he had himself booked as an express parcel

and put in charge of a telegraph messenger, who would not leave him

without a receipt duly signed at his destination. But the wandering

pedestrian is at great advantage where he seldom has out of sight such

landmarks as the Castle and Arthur’s Seat. There is no better way of

seeing the city than from the top of the tramcars that run in all

directions, the main line being a circular

[Illustration: CRAIGMILLAR CASTLE, NEAR EDINBURGH]

route from the Waverley Station round the west side of the Castle, then

through the south suburbs, and back beneath Arthur’s Seat to the Post

Office. Public motor cars also ply their terror along the chief

thoroughfares. The trams are on the cable system, invented for the steep

ascents of San Francisco, but out of favour in most cities. The excuse

for its adoption here was that bunches of overhead wires would spoil

such amenities as are the city’s stock in tourist trade. It has the

objectionable habit of keeping up along the line a rattle disquieting to

nervous people, while the car itself steals upon one like a thief in the

night; but it appears that accidents to life and limb are not so common

as hitches in the working.

The trams now run on Sunday, an innovation that shocks many good folk,

brought up in days when the streets of a Scottish city were as stricken

by the plague, unless at the hours when all the population came

streaming on foot to and from their different places of worship. A few

years ago, I felt it my duty to correct the late Max O’Rell, who had

gathered some wonderful stories supposed to illustrate the manners of

Scotland. As he related how, getting into an Edinburgh tramcar on

Sunday, his companion insisted on their riding inside not to be seen of

men, one was able to inform him that since the days of Moses no public

vehicle had disturbed Edinburgh’s Sabbath quiet. It is not so now; and

all the old stories about “whustlin’ on the Sabbath” and so forth will

soon be legends, so fast is the peculiar observance of Scottish piety

melting away.

R. L. Stevenson humorously called himself “a countryman of the Sabbath,”

but this institution is not so clearly a native of Scotland as has been

taken for granted. John Knox played bowls on Sunday; and the rigidity

that came in later was due as much to English Puritanism as to the

thrawnness of Scottish revolt against Catholic practices. Whatever its

origin, Sabbatarianism once weighed heavily on human nature north of the

Tweed. “Is this a day to be talking of days!” was the rebuke of the

Highlander to a tourist who ventured to remark that it was a fine

Sunday. Not so many years ago, I have known a Highland farmer refuse the

loan of a girdle to bake scones for a breadless family, “not on the

Sabbath”; yet this orthodox worthy and his sons, living as far from a

church as from a baker’s shop, seemed to spend most of the day of rest

lying by the roadside smoking their pipes and reading the newspaper. An

exiled Scot, in far distant lands, has told me how the shadow of the

coming Sabbath began to fall on his youth as early as Wednesday night.

The holy day was a term of imprisonment for juvenile spirits, its

treadmill two long services, chiefly sermon, sometimes run into one, or

separated by only a few minutes’ interval, to economise short winter

light in which worshippers might have to trudge miles to church. It is

in the Highlands and other out-of-the-way parts, of course, that such

austerities linger, while the urban populations more readily adopt

English compromises on this head.

In Edinburgh one generation has seen a great thawing of the Sabbath

spirit. I can remember the excitement caused all over Scotland by a

sermon in which Dr. Norman Macleod proclaimed that there was no harm in

taking a walk on Sunday. The _Scotsman_, a paper that has never much

flattered its readers’ prejudices, came out with a sly humorous article

headed “Murder of Moses’ Law by Dr. Norman Macleod,” and it is said that

some good people read this in the sense that the “broad” divine had

actually committed homicide. Even earlier, Edinburgh people had tacitly

sanctioned a walk to a cemetery, as echoing the teachings of the pulpit.

The story went that the present King, when at Edinburgh University, was

sternly denied admission to the Botanic Gardens on Sunday; but he might

unblamed have taken a stroll through the adjacent tombs of Warriston.

From the Dean Cemetery, the West End ventured on extending its Sunday

ramble as far as “Rest and be Thankful” on Corstorphine Hill; then it

was a fresh scandal when a very Lord of Session came to show himself on

this road in tweeds, instead of the full phylacteries that might attest

previous church-going. Of another judge living at Corstorphine it is

told that he once sought to mend the morals of a cobbler helplessly

drunk at his gate on Sunday afternoon, but was met by the hiccoughed

repartee, “Wha’s you, without your Sabbath blacks?”

In my youth the police would put a stop to skating or such like

diversions on Sabbath; but now Sunday bicycles flit over the country;

the iniquity of a Sunday band is tolerated in the parks; while a society

is suffered to promote Sunday concerts and lectures indoors. Another

sign of the times is that Christmas in Edinburgh begins to be almost as

much observed as the national festival of New Year’s Day, whereas

orthodox Presbyterianism once made a point of ignoring fasts and feasts

sanctioned by prelacy or popery. As for its own fasts, they have long

been transmuted into junketings; and the sacramental “preachings” of

large towns are now frankly abolished in favour of public holidays

answering to the English saturnalia of St. Lubbock, observed only by

banks across the Tweed. The Communion, in old days administered but once

or twice a year, and regarded in some parts with such awe that few

ventured to put themselves forward as participants, is now a frequent

rite in Presbyterian Churches, whose congregations are throwing off

their horror of ornament and ceremony, as may be seen in St. Giles.

Old-fashioned English rectors of the Simeon school have been known to

shake their heads at the services now read in the ears of descendants of

that Jenny Geddes who so forcibly testified against a prayer-book

declared by ribald jesters hateful to Scotland through its too frequent

mention of “Collect.”

The honest stranger, then, has nothing to fear from the austerity of

Scottish morals, not even the supposed risk of being married by mistake.

It will be his own fault if he fail to find a welcome across the Tweed.

Effusive manners are not the Scot’s strong point, and he may be accused

of a certain suspicion of offence, kept sharp by the careless and not

ill-natured insolence of southrons who are so free with their jovial

jests about “bawbees” and such like, well-worn and rusty pleasantries

coined in the days of Bute’s unpopularity and Johnson’s bearish

dogmatism. Among the baser sorts of Scots are still current inverse

sarcasms against English “pock-puddings,” conceived as fat and greedy;

but they would have to be fished up from a low social stratum by the

travelling gent who cannot understand that, however little disposed

[Illustration: LINLITHGOW PALACE]

Sandy may have been to hang his head for honest poverty, he ill relishes

its being flung in his face. “A sooth bourd is nae bourd,” says the old

proverb; but now, what with tourists, and trade, and Scotsmen who come

back again, bringing the spoils of the world with them, the reproach of

poverty ceases to be so sore a one.

Though in the eyes of busy Glasgow Edinburgh may pass as a retired

capital, living on its means of attraction, it has in fact several

industries from which to earn a livelihood. Along with the lodging and

amusing of strangers, it must do a good business in the tartans,

pebbles, silver-work, and other showy wares displayed in Princes Street

shop windows. “Edinbury Rock,” done up in tartan wrappers, is much

pressed upon the notice of tourists; the same indeed being sold in other

towns under their own name. As for shortbread, scones, biscuits, and

other manufactures of the “Land of Cakes,” these have invaded London,

where every baker not a German is like to be a Scot. It will be noted by

Cockney revilers as a proof of Scotch thriftiness, which might bear

another interpretation, that what costs a penny in a London baker’s shop

is here sold for a halfpenny. Well known to strangers are the Princes

Street confectioners’ shops, several of them extensive restaurants like

that one which, crowning its storeys of accommodation, has a roof garden

looking upon the Castle opposite.

The staple trades of Edinburgh have come to be printing and publishing,

and, as the nettle grows near the dock, brewing and distilling. The

great Scottish publishing firms have of late years shown a tendency to

gravitate towards London; but more than one still keeps its

headquarters here, beside some of the largest and best printing

establishments in the kingdom. It must be confessed that what is spoken

of as “_the_ trade,” is whisky, too much consumed about the premises, as

visitors are apt to note. The worst shame a Scotsman need take for

Scotland is on account of what Englishmen specially distinguish as

“Scotch.” I never heard sadder jest than the laughing comment of a group

of Dundee lasses, as they passed a braw lad wallowing in the gutter at

mid-day--“He’s having his holidays!” Yet as to this reproach, something

might be said in plea for mitigation of judgment. Something to the

purpose was said by that experienced toper who explained how “whusky

makes ye drunk before ye are fu’, but yill makes ye fu’ before ye are

drunk.” The whisky drunk by the lower classes here is a demon that takes

no disguise. It seems that, while there is more brutal intoxication in

Scotland, there may be less toping sottishness than in England. Men seen

so helplessly overcome at the ninth hour of a holiday are perhaps of

ordinarily sober habits, all the more readily affected by occasional

indulgence in fiery spirit. A woman frequenting public-houses implies a

lower depth of degradation. In the north, a larger proportion of the

population are abstainers; young people and the class of domestic

servants for instance, drink water where in English families they would

expect beer. In all classes, there are still too many Scotsmen religious

in the worship of their native Bacchus, vulgar and violent deity as he

is; but every year adds to the number of Protestants against this

perverted fanaticism. By the Forbes Mackenzie Act, all public-houses

are

[Illustration: THE BASS ROCK--A TRANQUIL EVENING]

closed on Sunday, when, however, if all stories be true, a good deal of

_shebeening_ or illicit drinking goes on in the cities. It is not

unreasonable to suppose that the austerity of Scottish Sabbatarianism

has driven many into vicious indulgence; and much is to be hoped from

the churches taking an interest in honest amusement as a help and not a

hindrance to religion. But a sneer often thrown out by strangers against

the supposed hypocrisy of Scotsmen, only shows ignorance of a country

where those most concerned about Sabbath observance have long been the

deadliest enemies of drinking habits.

Whisky, as well as golf, has now so masterfully invaded England, that

this can no longer be called “Scottish Drink,” as it was not by Burns.

In his day, home-brewed beer was the Lowland beverage, of which a

Cromwellian soldier complained as more like brose for its thickness. Up

to our day “Edinburgh Ale” made the capital’s chief contribution to the

heady gaiety of nations. Whisky came in from the Highlands, its name a

contraction of _uisgebeatha_, “water of life,” which Burns and Scott

write _usquebaugh_, the Celtic word for water being the same that

appears in so many river names _Esk_, _Usk_, _Exe_, _Axe_, and so forth.

Even in the Highlands, this mountain dew would seem to have supplanted

beer within historic times; and old writers admire the temperance as

much as the honesty and courage of Highlanders. Both Highland and

Lowland gentlemen preferred brandy, in the days when, as Lord Cockburn

tells us, claret was hawked about the Edinburgh streets in a cart, a jug

of any reasonable size being filled for sixpence.

Firm and erect the Caledonian stood,

Old was his mutton, and his claret good.

Let him drink port! a beef-fed statesman cried.

He drank the poison and his spirit died.

The preference for French wine and spirits before the days of Hanoverian

fiscalities, relates to the old alliance with France, which has left its

mark also on Scottish speech. That warning cry “Gardy-loo” (_gardez

l’eau_), which gave such scandal to early English tourists, was of

course a survival of a far-spread practice in cities before the days of

drainage or even of ash-backets (_baquets_). Many French household words

are used in Scotland at this day, as “caraff” (_carafe_), “ashet”

(_assiette_), a “jiggot” of mutton (_gigot_) a “haggis” (_hachis_); and

Burns’s “silver tassie” was of course a _tasse_. A “cummer” (_commère_)

“canna be fashed” (_se fâcher_) to step out to the “merchant’s,” who may

be “douce” or “dour” and an “honest” man (_honnête_), though sharp in

his bargains. “Ma certie (_certes_), that’s a braw (_brave_) vest!”

quoth a lass to her lad, a word here used like the French _garçon_ or

_gars_, while _gosse_ will be distinguished as a “laddie,” who grows to

be a “young lad” in spite of orgies on sour “grozers” or “grozets” and

“gheans,” which in France are _groseilles_ and _guignes_, but in England

gooseberries and wild cherries. French names too have taken root in

Scotland, Janet (Jeannette) being very common with one sex, as Louis or

Ludovic is not unknown in the other. For the matter of that, one might

string together instances of how the well of Old English flows undefiled

by time in the north.

Then brought to him that maiden meek

_Hose_ and _shoon_ and _sark_ and _breek_.

These words are used to this day in every Scottish cottage, as once in

the stately style of an early southron minstrel. Shakespeare and the

Bible show many picked phrases which are now wild flowers in the north;

and high example might be found for the _shalls_ and _wills_ that here

run loose from the enclosures of modern grammarians. But as Mr. David

MacRitchie suggests in an interesting pamphlet, “to _doubt_ that one is

_colded_ and can’t go to _the_ church,” seem rather specimens of French

idioms transplanted during the three centuries or so that Capets and

Stuarts stood together against the Plantagenets.

Protestantism availed to draw Scotland from the arms of France into

those of England; then Prelacy and Presbytery set the near neighbours

again at odds. For some generations, the young Scotsmen who had once

sought the Catholic schools of the Continent, were more in the way of

finishing their education at Dutch or German Universities. Scotland had

also an old connection, chiefly in the way of trade, with Scandinavia

and Poland, in both of which countries Scottish family names are

naturalised, as Swedish Dicksons and Polish Gordons. Scots students of

our day still look to Germany, under whose professors they are apt to

forget the Shorter Catechism for the categories of Kant and the secret

of Hegel. The Union was not fully consummated till Macs began to make

themselves at home in Oxford and Cambridge, while for a time the renown

of Scottish philosophy drew some of the promising English youth to

Edinburgh, whose medical school kept up the attraction. In the last

generation or two, Scotsmen have been only too ready to go south for

education, seeking a stamp of Anglified gentility as well as better

qualities which were perhaps not to be had from those rude old dominies

under whom the young laird and the barefoot loon once sat together in

friendly hatred of “carritch” and rudiments.

Such foreign communications cannot but help young Scotsmen to put their

native prejudices in due proportion, and to doubt if the sun of truth

has always shown most clearly in the sky of one small people much beset

by mists and east winds. Yet Scottish parents seem much “left to

themselves” in sending their sons and daughters beyond Edinburgh for

schooling. One of the most important industries of this city has come to

be education. It abounds in teaching of all kinds, from its venerable

University to spick and span board schools. Those who believe the fable

of Scotch niggardliness should consider that no place in the United

Kingdom, unless it be Bedford, is so rich in educational endowments, and

palatial charity schools, which have long ceased to be charities.

Edinburgh, indeed, suffered from such an embarrassment of benefactions

of this kind, that in our time, several of them have been turned into

day-schools, giving a complete education to thousands of boys and girls

of the better class. The latest large endowment, that of Sir William

Fettes for the children of necessitous families, was applied to building

a sumptuous pile, handed over _per saltum_ to the upper class as a

seminary on the model of English public schools, which only in the

course of generations came so far from the intention

[Illustration: LOCH ACHRAY, THE TROSSACHS, PERTHSHIRE]

of their pious founders. This competition has but set on their mettle

the once “New” Academy, for the best part of a century the chief school

in Scotland, and the old High School that nursed so many generations of

distinguished Scotsmen.

So, as at Bedford, where marriageable damsels complain of the _hims_ as

being either too ancient or too modern, the population of the Scottish

capital is increased by a selection of retired family-fathers, and a

swarm of youngsters who appear to thrive on the easterly winds and

haars. This hint about the weather is let slip unhappily, since I am

about to put forward a bold pretension for “mine own romantic town,” in

a character not obviously associated with it. In case of seeming too

presumptuous on its behalf, I will quote from Black’s _Guide to

Edinburgh_, which ought to be well informed on such matters:--

“In the holiday season, when Edinburgh is deserted by the upper

class of its inhabitants, why should it not be sought as a pleasant

change by the inhabitants of more grimy cities or less inspiring

scenes? It may seem strange to mention the capital of Scotland as a

health resort; yet, when one comes to think of it, ‘Auld Reekie’

has more claim to this extra title than many less famous places

which flourish in full reputation for gay and picturesque

salubrity. The fact is, that had Edinburgh not been a great city,

it might well be a Clifton or a Scarborough, and its ancient

dignity need not be allowed to overshadow its other merits. To

begin with, the climate is airy and bracing, notoriously rather too

much so at most seasons, but the sea-breezes cool the heat of

summer, and the moderate rainfall is soon carried off on the

sloping streets. Practically it stands on the sea, the shore being

hardly farther from the centre of Edinburgh than from some parts

of Brighton. By train or tram one can run down at any hour to

Portobello, where are sands, donkeys, crowds, bathing-machines,

pleasure-boats, and ornamental pier to satisfy the most fastidious

Margateer. At Craiglockhart, a mile or so from the outskirts of the

town, there is a first-class hydropathic establishment, nestling

under the wild scenery of the Pentland Hills. Nor is mineral water

wanting, if that be desired. In the valley of the Water of Leith,

below the stately mansions of Moray Place, a sulphurous spring may

be found dispensed in a little classical temple that elsewhere

would pass for a creditable pump-room, though many citizens of

Edinburgh, perhaps, know nothing about it. Bands play almost daily

in one or other of the parks; and even nigger minstrels, no doubt,

might be found, if that feature seemed indispensable to the

character of a holiday resort. There is no want of theatrical and

other performances. Then, as we have shown, few cities are so well

off for coach, steamboat, and railway excursions which would bring

one back in a day from a round through half of Scotland.”

Bonnie Scotland Painted by Sutton Palmer; Described by A.R. Hope Moncrieff · 第 2 / 12 章