PUNISHMENT OF TREACHEROUS BEASTS

I have already cited one cardinal rule recognized by all animal

workers. There is one other just as universally accepted by the

fraternity of trainers. This is, that any animal which has inflicted

injury on a trainer must be punished until completely subjugated. This

punishment must be given, if possible, by the one whom the creature has

injured.

No doubt more than one trainer who has been half killed by a

treacherous animal has been inclined to overlook this chastisement

after recovering from his injuries. This, however, is regarded as

professional treachery, for it is practically certain that the

rebellious animal that is not chastised in this manner will kill the

next man who enters its cage. To neglect to show the brute which has

injured you that you are its master is therefore, according to the

ethics of the profession, a deed of cowardice, and a sure way of

bringing disaster upon any other person having the hardihood to trust

himself in the power of an animal that has "downed" its trainer.

Of course some trainers are killed outright, and others are so disabled

in severe encounters that they are absolutely unable to continue in the

service. Then the duty of inflicting the chastisement falls upon a new

man, and you may rest assured he never looks forward to the job with

any particular pleasure. There is but one course, however, and that is

to beat the creature until it howls for mercy. Occasionally an animal

famed for its splendid performances is suddenly and without any

apparent reason retired from the program. As a performing animal is

worth many times as much as one that has not been trained, this would

seem a strange and unbusinesslike course on the part of the management.

The outsider would immediately ask: "Why not continue the performance

with this animal so long as it does not kill a man or conduct itself

more savagely than many others of its kind which have the confidence of

trainers and performers?"

The answer is very simple: The man handling the animal and knowing well

its character has been able to discern a radical change in its

disposition. He declares that the brute is no longer to be trusted, and

any wise and humane showman who receives this kind of a warning from a

reliable and efficient trainer or performer will retire the brute in

question to a cage and leave it there. On the other hand, some animals

which have tasted blood, and even "killed their man," are continued in

the service. Why? Because the trainer who goes in to chastise them

believes that he has been able to beat the animal into a permanent

state of penitence, humility and wholesome fear, and to effectually

obliterate the sense of triumph in the mind of the creature.

Sawdust & Spangles: Stories & Secrets of the Circus · 第 103 / 142 题