LETTER XLIII.

SELBORNE, _Sept._ 9_th_, 1778.

Dear Sir,--From the motion of birds, the transition is natural enough

to their notes and language, of which I shall say something. Not that

I would pretend to understand their language like the vizier of the

_Spectator_, who, by recital of a conversation which passed between two

owls, reclaimed a sultan, before delighting in conquest and

devastation; but I would be thought only to mean that many of the

winged tribes have various sounds and voices adapted to express their

various passions, wants and feelings; such as anger, fear, love,

hatred, hunger and the like. All species are not equally eloquent;

some are copious and fluent as it were in their utterance while others

are confined to a few important sounds: no bird, like the fish kind, is

quite mute, though some are rather silent. The language of birds is

very ancient and, like other ancient modes of speech, very elliptical;

little is said, but much is meant and understood.

The notes of the eagle-kind are shrill and piercing and about the season

of nidification much diversified, as I have been often assured by a

curious observer of Nature, who long resided at Gibraltar, where eagles

abound. The notes of our hawks much resemble those of the king of birds.

Owls have very expressive notes; they hoot in a fine vocal sound, much

resembling the _vox humana_, and reducible by a pitch-pipe to a musical

key. This note seems to express complacency and rivalry among the males;

they use also a quick call and a horrible scream: and can snore and hiss

when they mean to menace. Ravens, besides their loud croak, can exert a

deep and solemn note that makes the woods to echo; the amorous sound of a

crow is strange and ridiculous; rooks, in the breeding season, attempt

sometimes in the gaiety of their hearts to sing, but with no great

success; the parrot-kind have many modulations of voice, as appears by

their aptitude to learn human sounds; doves coo in an amorous and

mournful manner, and are emblems of despairing lovers; the woodpecker

sets up a sort of loud and hearty laugh; the fern-owl, or goat-sucker,

from the dusk till daybreak, serenades his mate with the clattering of

castanets. All the tuneful _passeres_ express their complacency by sweet

modulations and a variety of melody. The swallow, as has been observed

in a former letter, by a shrill alarm bespeaks the attention of the other

hirundines, and bids them be aware the hawk is at hand. Aquatic and

gregarious birds, especially the nocturnal, that shift their quarters in

the dark, are very noisy and loquacious; as cranes, wild-geese,

wild-ducks, and the like; their perpetual clamour prevents them from

dispersing and losing their companions.

In so extensive a subject, sketches and outlines are as much as can be

expected; for it would be endless to instance in all the infinite variety

of the feathered nation. We shall therefore confine the remainder of

this letter to the few domestic fowls of our yards, which are most known,

and therefore best understood. And first the peacock, with his gorgeous

train, demands our attention; but, like most of the gaudy birds, his

notes are grating and shocking to the ear: the yelling of cats, and the

braying of an ass, are not more disgustful. The voice of the goose is

trumpet-like and clanking; and once saved the Capitol at Rome, as grave

historians assert; the hiss, also, of the gander, is formidable and full

of menace, and "protective of his young." Among ducks the sexual

distinction of voice is remarkable; for, while the quack of the female is

loud and sonorous, the voice of the drake is inward and harsh, and

feeble, and scarce discernible. The cock turkey struts and gobbles to

his mistress in a most uncouth manner; he hath also a pert and petulant

note when he attacks his adversary. When a hen turkey leads forth her

young brood she keeps a watchful eye; and if a bird of prey appear,

though ever so high in the air, the careful mother announces the enemy

with a little inward moan, and watches him with a steady and attentive

look; but if he approach, her note becomes earnest and alarming, and her

outcries are redoubled.

No inhabitants of a yard seem possessed of such a variety of expression

and so copious a language as common poultry. Take a chicken of four or

five days old, and hold it up to a window where there are flies, and it

will immediately seize its prey, with little twitterings of complacency;

but if you tender it a wasp or a bee, at once its note becomes harsh, and

expressive of disapprobation and a sense of danger. When a pullet is

ready to lay she intimates the event by a joyous and easy soft note. Of

all the occurrences of their life, that of laying seems to be the most

important; for no sooner has a hen disburdened herself, than she rushes

forth with a clamorous kind of joy, which the cock and the rest of his

mistresses immediately adopt. The tumult is not confined to the family

concerned, but catches from yard to yard, and spreads to every homestead

within hearing, till at last the whole village is in an uproar. As soon

as a hen becomes a mother her new relation demands a new language; she

then runs clucking and screaming about, and seems agitated as if

possessed. The father of the flock has also a considerable vocabulary;

if he finds food, he calls a favourite concubine to partake; and if a

bird of prey passes over, with a warning voice he bids his family beware.

The gallant chanticleer has at command his amorous phrases and his terms

of defiance. But the sound by which he is best known is his crowing: by

this he has been distinguished in all ages as the countryman's clock or

larum, as the watchman that proclaims the divisions of the night. Thus

the poet elegantly styles him:

" . . . the crested cock, whose clarion sounds

The silent hours."

A neighbouring gentleman one summer had lost most of his chickens by a

sparrow-hawk, that came gliding down between a faggot pile and the end of

his house to the place where the coops stood. The owner, inwardly vexed

to see his flock thus diminished, hung a setting-net adroitly between the

pile and the house, into which the caitiff dashed and was entangled.

Resentment suggested the law of retaliation; he therefore clipped the

hawk's wings, cut off his talons, and, fixing a cork on his bill, threw

him down among the brood-hens. Imagination cannot paint the scene that

ensued; the expressions that fear, rage, and revenge inspired, were new,

or at least such as had been unnoticed before: the exasperated matrons

upbraided, they execrated, they insulted, they triumphed. In a word,

they never desisted from buffeting their adversary till they had torn him

in a hundred pieces.

The Natural History of Selborne, Vol. 2 · 第 54 / 90 题