CHAPTER VII.

1817.

Visit of the Grand Duke Nicholas of Russia -- Stones thrown

at the Regent -- Issue of the new Silver Coinage -- Riots and

arrests for sedition -- First issue of Sovereigns -- The Case of

Abraham Thornton and appeal by battle -- The Queen at Bath --

Death of the Princess Charlotte -- Richard Owen and his scheme

-- "The Fortunate Youth" -- "Caraboo."

The Chronicle of this year opens with the record of a luckily rare

visitation, namely, that a slight shock of earthquake was felt on

January 8th at Mansfield, in Nottinghamshire. In 1816 a shock had

been felt in several places in Scotland.

The Grand Duke Nicholas of Russia, afterwards Czar, was over here,

and spent some months in this country, and those of us who remember

the last war we had with Russia, will scarcely recognize the stern

Nicholas of the Crimea, under the guise of the light-hearted Grand

Duke, as exemplified in the following anecdote, which occurred early

in January:--

"A LITTLE FROLIC OF THE GRAND DUKE NICHOLAS.--On his Imperial

Highness leaving Chester for Montgomeryshire, he perceived one of the

outriders to be mounted on a good horse; being a fine morning, his

Highness felt disposed to take a ride, and requested to change place

with the Courier; it was a fourteen-mile stage, and, on descending

a very long and steep hill, his Highness did not like to crawl down

so slow as the others, and told his suite that he would ride on, and

order some refreshment and horses for them. On his Highness arriving

at the Inn, he desired the landlady to prepare some beefsteaks and

mutton chops for the Grand Duke and his suite.

"The landlady observed that they should immediately be got ready,

and, taking his Highness for the Courier, asked him to accept of

something, which he politely declined, observing that he would wait

until the company arrived. She then showed him the room she had

prepared for the Grand Duke, and asked him if he thought it would

do? His Highness told her that it would do extremely well. The

carriages shortly after arrived, and the hostess begged him to have

the goodness to point out to her the Grand Duke; his Highness smiled,

and said she would be sure to see him." When Generals Kutusoff and

Mansel alighted and saluted him, one can picture the landlady's

astonishment. Nicholas was so pleased with the horse that he bought

it. He left England at the end of March.

Far less popular was another Royal Highness, far nearer home. The

Prince Regent went on the 28th of January to open the Session

of Parliament, and was met with a storm of yells and opprobious

epithets, but he got safely to the House of Lords, and delivered his

speech; on his return, the clamour and insults had vastly increased.

It is true that some few cried "God save the King," but the majority

hissed and hooted at, and called his Royal Highness naughty names;

the climax was reached when the Regent's carriage was about the

middle of the Mall. Some evilly disposed person threw a stone, or

stones, at the Royal equipage, and made a hole in one of the windows.

This hole remains a mystery, for the window on the opposite side

was not broken, and no stone, nor other missile, was found in the

carriage.

Lord James Murray, who was Lord of the Bedchamber to the Regent, was

in the carriage with him, and was examined shortly afterwards at the

bar of the House of Commons, and he was of opinion that the hole in

the window was made by two small bullets, about a quarter of an inch

apart--but this must have been pure conjecture on his lordship's

part. He went on to say that "about a minute after the glass was

broken, as I have described, a large stone was thrown against the

glass of the carriage, which broke it, and three or four other small

stones were thrown, which struck the glass, and the other part of the

carriage." And this is all that was found out about it.

The Lords and Commons united in an Address conveying their Abhorrence

of this attack upon his Royal Highness--the Guards at the Palaces,

the Parks, the Bank, and elsewhere were doubled; the Lord Mayor

was informed of the awful occurrence, and requested, if he thought

necessary, to call in the aid of the Military power, and despatches

were sent by the Mail Coaches to every part of the kingdom, to put

the Magistrates in every place on their guard. But there was no

occasion for all this fuss: the event did not produce a ferment in

the public mind, and we learn in next morning's paper, "that by five

o'clock in the afternoon the streets were perfectly clear of all mob,

and no disposition to riot appeared in any part of the town."

[Illustration: "The New Coinage; or, John Bull's Visit to Mat of The

Mint!!" (_February 13, 1817._)

_New Silver to enable the people to give intrinsic value for Bank

rags & worthless Tokens_]

A man named James Scott was the only one arrested, although £1,000

reward was offered for the Criminals, and as somebody was wanted to

be hanged, they accused him of high treason in throwing stones at the

Vicegerent of the Lord's Anointed. But, although they tried very hard

for a conviction, it only wanted three examinations by a Magistrate

to acquit the man of the charge of treason, but he was committed for

a misdemeanour in aiding and abetting of the Riot. He was admitted to

bail in two Sureties of £100 each, and himself in £200. Reading

the evidence, I can see nothing to incriminate him, and as I can

find nothing about his conviction, or acquittal, from any source, I

presume he was never called upon to appear. Peter Pindar satirised

this event in "R--LTY BESET."

On the 18th of January, a proclamation was issued "from our Court

at Brighton," announcing the issue of a new Silver Coinage, which

might be changed for old, at the Mint, between the 3rd and 17th of

February: and another proclamation of the 12th of February, "from

our Court at Carlton House," gave the date of the 13th of February

as that of general issue, after which they were to be taken as

lawful money. On this date was published a Satirical print, called

"The New Coinage, or John Bull's visit to MAT of the MINT!!"[26] in

which Wellesley Pole, "Master and Worker of his Majesty's Mint," is

shovelling money into a sack, saying "There, Johnny! see how I have

been working for you for months past; you can't say I get my money

for nothing." John Bull replies, "You be a very industrious man,

Master Mat, and the prettiest _Cole_[27] merchant I have dealt with

for many a day." The room, and the street, seen through an open door,

are crowded with men, women, and children, anxious to get the new

silver. That advantage was taken of promptly changing old worn silver

for bright new coin, is shown that by the 19th the large Hall of the

Bank, which was given up to its issue, was nearly empty, and the old

coinage had disappeared from circulation. They were counterfeited

immediately, which was a natural sequence, and there were squabbles

about their artistic merits, which was also natural. Regarding the

latter, as there are plenty of this issue now in circulation, my

readers can judge for themselves. There was the usual epigram upon it.

[Footnote 26: Mat o' the Mint was a character in Gay's

Beggar's Opera.]

[Footnote 27: _Cole_ or _Coal_ is thieves' slang for money,

and many people carry a piece of Coal in their pocket,

under the belief that so long as they have _Cole_ in their

pocket they will never want for money.]

"THE NEW COIN.

It is allow'd, throughout the town,

The head upon the new Half-Crown,

Is not the GEORGE we so much prize--

The Chin's not like--the Nose--the Eyes.

This may be true--yet, on the whole,

The fault lies chiefly _in the Pole_!"

Reform was being violently agitated all over the country, and,

without wishing to give this book any political character, yet as a

phase of social life it must be mentioned. There were riots late in

February in Somersetshire, among the Colliers, who struck against

a deduction of 10 per cent. in their wages. They did not do much

damage, but a dangerous spirit was abroad, and the cry of "Bread or

Blood; Hunt for ever!" was ominous of mischief. They were soon put

down by a troop of the 22nd Lancers, from Bristol, and the North

Somerset Yeomanry, without bloodshed.

On the 28th of February, the operation of the Act of _Habeas Corpus_

was suspended, and was not resumed until the 31st of January, 1818.

Of the Spa Fields rioters, two others besides Cashman, whose

execution has already been recorded, were hanged--and the others

in custody respited during pleasure: but no severity could quell

the unhappy feeling all over England. The people were restless and

suffering, and were determined to make themselves heard: as, for

instance, on the 10th of March, a meeting took place at Manchester

for the avowed purpose of petitioning the Prince Regent for a redress

of grievances, and a Reform in Parliament. It was recommended for the

Reformers to proceed in a large body to London, which was attempted

to be carried into effect by some hundreds, who had provided

themselves with blankets and bundles; but, by the activity of the

Magistrates, aided by the military, their purpose was defeated, and

several of the leaders were committed to prison.

On the 18th of March numerous arrests took place at Manchester, of

persons charged with seditious practices; and on the 25th of March

the Bill to prevent seditious meetings passed the House of Commons

by a large majority. High treason had become so familiar that

new regulations had to be adopted in the Tower, as to prisoners

contained there. "Each prisoner is kept in a separate apartment, and

night and day, two yeomen, or warders, continue in the room, the

door of which is locked, and on the outside a sentinel is placed

to prevent the approach of any one, except those in the Governor's

establishment. Their beds and board are provided by the Government.

No person is allowed to see the prisoners, unless a special order

is sent to the Lieutenant-Governor by the Clerk of the Council, and

then they are restricted from holding any communication except in the

presence and hearing of some persons appointed by the lieutenant, or

his deputy."

Let us pass to something pleasanter. The Custom House was opened for

business on the 12th of May without ceremony, and as one newspaper

says: "This structure is, in fact, perfect in everything, as its

inmates confess, and wants nothing but _business_." But the building

was not finished until the 2nd of August.

The only Social News between this date and July is the account of

mere riots at Nottingham and Leeds--together with State trials--which

we will skip.

On the 1st of July were issued the new gold Coin "the Sovereign,"

and from that date the old Guinea was doomed, and only now survives

in professional fees, and wherever any one can stick on an extra

shilling to a Sovereign. They were taken very kindly to, only some

exception was taken to the name, many thinking they ought to have

been called a "George." The half-sovereigns soon got a nickname,

that of "Regents." This is what a wicked wag thought of the "New

Sovereign":

"The Horse on the _Coin_ is more fit for a Waggon,

Than meet for _St. George_ to encounter the _Dragon_!

And, as for the _Effigy_, meant for the _Saint_,

He appears like a _Sans Culotte_, ready to faint;

With his head hanging down o'er a lean hungry paunch,

He has struck, with his spear, his poor horse, on the haunch;

While the _Dragon_ in pity, looks at the incision,

And cocks up his nose, at _St. George_ in derision!!!"

One of the most famous Criminal Cases of modern times occurred this

year--singular for the fact that it revived the old Ordeal, "Appeal

by battle," which had been in obeyance since 1771, and which no one

ever dreamed would be revived. One Abraham Thornton had been accused

of murdering Mary Ashford by drowning her on the 27th of May. He was

tried, and acquitted, but was subsequently arrested in October on an

appeal. This was heard in the King's Bench on the 17th of November,

and both Appellant and Appellee answered to their names. The first,

William Ashford, brother of the deceased, is described as being a

slight made lad, about seventeen years of age, and short in stature.

Thornton stood about five feet four inches high, very stout and

robust.

After the preliminary formalities were over, Mr. Leblanc, clerk to

the Crown, read over the record against him, and asked him whether

he was guilty or not." "His Counsel, Mr. Reader, then put a piece of

paper in his hand from which the prisoner read:

"'NOT GUILTY; AND I AM READY TO DEFEND THE SAME WITH MY BODY.'

"Mr. Reader had likewise handed a pair of large gauntlets, or gloves,

to the prisoner, one of which he put on, and the other, in pursuance

of the old form, he threw down for the appellant to take up. It was

not taken up, and

"Mr. Reader moved that it should be kept in the custody of the

officer of the Court.

Mr. Leblanc: Your plea is that you are not Guilty, and that you are

ready to defend the said plea with your body?

"The Prisoner: It is.

"Lord Ellenborough: Is the Appellant in Court?

"Mr. Clarke (his Counsel): He is, my Lord."

He appeared, but said nothing, and then Mr. Clarke addressed the

Court with a counter plea for the Appellant. In the course of his

speech, he said, "It would appear to me extraordinary indeed, if the

person who murdered the sister, should, as the law exists in these

enlightened times, be allowed to prove his innocence by murdering the

brother also, or at least, by an attempt to do so.

"Lord Ellenborough: It is the law of England, Mr. Clarke. We must not

call it murder."

Mr. Clarke then went on arguing that, surely the appeal must be

discretionary with the Court, and urged the inferiority of his

client's physique.

The Case was adjourned until the 22nd of November, when the Appellant

pleaded that Thornton ought not to be admitted to wage battle with

him, because both before and after the appeal there had been, and

still were, proofs that he had murdered the Appellant's sister. Case

adjourned.

On the 16th of April, 1818, Abraham Thornton was discharged, without

bail, the appellant declining the Challenge to combat, according to

ancient usage. But such a scandal could not long continue, and the

law was repealed in 1819 (59 George III. cap. 46).

What became of him, I know not, but I find mention of him in _The

Morning Chronicle_ of the 26th of October, 1818. _The Liverpool

Courier_ says: "We stated a few weeks ago, that the celebrated

Abraham Thornton had arrived in this town for the purpose of

emigrating to the United States. He has experienced more difficulty

than he anticipated in getting a passage thither. It appears that he

had engaged one in the _Independence_, but, when the other passengers

became acquainted with his name and character, they unanimously

refused to go in the same vessel with him; and a new Muster roll

was, in consequence, made out, in which his name was omitted."

The Chinese Embassy sent out under Lord Amherst had returned, having

failed in its object, his lordship refusing to kotoo to the Emperor:

his ship, the _Alceste_, being fired into by the Chinese.

The health of that tough old lady, Queen Charlotte, was beginning

to fail, and her physicians recommended her to go to Bath, for the

waters, and, in November, thither repaired, accompanied by the Duke

of Clarence.

The illustration gives an extremely graphic idea of the effects of

the Water upon the afflicted Queen. It is called "A PEEP into the

PUMP ROOM, or the Zomersetshire folk in A Maze."

The following anecdote of her sojourn is dated "Bath, November

28th.--The Queen wishing to ride through Prior Park, the property of

John Thomas, a very rich Quaker, a footman was sent forward to the

house to ask leave for the gates to be opened. Mr. Thomas received

the Queen very respectfully at the park gate, and addressed her as

follows: "Charlotte, I hope thee is very well: I am glad to see thee

in my park; thou art very welcome at any time, and I shall feel proud

in opening my gates for thy pleasure. I hope thou receives benefit

from the Bath waters. I wish thee well."

[Illustration: "A Peep into the Pump Room; or, The Zomersetshire Folk

in a Maze," October, 1817. (_Published, February, 1818._)]

Early in the morning of the 6th of November, died the Princess

Charlotte. On the day before she had been delivered of a stillborn

child, and was reported to be going on well, but within twelve hours

she was a corpse. There really was sorrow when she died. Her husband

was inconsolable, and her father, bereft of his only, though somewhat

wayward child, stayed at home and was ill. She was buried, with all

pomp, at Windsor, on the 19th of November. There was no Lord Mayor's

Show this year.

Before the end of the year there were more riots at Brighton and

Worcester, and a Commission sat at Derby, upon thirty-five persons

charged with high treason. Three of them, Brandreth, Ludlam, and

Turner were found guilty, and afterwards hanged and beheaded. The

others, on withdrawing their plea of not guilty, were dealt with

mercifully.

The Chronicle of this year must not be closed without mention of

Robert Owen, a Cotton Spinner at Lanark, who was a Social Reformer

of somewhat peculiar views. He had a Plan for the better support and

government of the poor, the outlines of which are as follows:--He

proposed to make the poor National, and to raise funds by mortgaging

the poor's rate to the amount of five or six years of its annual

value. The money so raised, in sums as required, he would have

applied in purchase of land, in portions of different magnitudes,

and erect establishments thereon for the accommodation of from

five hundred to fifteen hundred people. Of these buildings he

furnished a plan, on a scale for twelve hundred persons--men, women,

and children. The buildings were to be surrounded by a regulated

quantity of land for _spade_ cultivation--say an acre for each

person, including the site of erection--and they were designed for

a pauper community, which was to supply everything for itself; and

to be superintended on the principle of combining moral culture, and

reformation, with industry and frugality.

[Illustration: Robert Owen, August 21, 1817.]

The occupants were both to farm and manufacture, and, consequently,

to employ the faculties of each description of poor. Besides

comfortable lodging rooms, the buildings were intended to contain

a public kitchen, mess rooms, and all requisite accommodation

attached to comfortable cookery and eating; a chapel, infant

schools, schools for adults, grounds for exercise and recreation,

planted and beautified with trees. The lodgings for the married

poor, each to be sufficient to accommodate two children with their

father and mother: dormitories for children above three years of

age; manufactories and gardens; a complete farming establishment;

malting, and brewing-houses, corn-mill, dairy, and, in short, all the

constituents for self-support. To the men were assigned the labours

of agriculture, and the heaviest part of the manufactures. To the

women the care of their children and houses, the cultivation of

vegetables, the making of clothes, and an attendance, in rotation,

on the kitchen, mess-room, and dormitories. The children were to be

trained in the lighter occupations until fit for manly or womanly

employment, &c. The expense of such an establishment for twelve

hundred people, Owen estimated at £96,000.

In the latter part of this year, a great deal was heard of "The

Fortunate Youth." The story told about whom was, that a young

gentleman met with a very rich old one, who took a violent fancy

to the youth, used often to have him at his house, without the

knowledge of his parents, and finally, dying, left "The Fortunate

Youth" an immense fortune. This lad succeeded in humbugging people

to an unlimited extent, and in obtaining money from them, until, in

a Newspaper of the 6th of December, appeared: "SOI-DISANT FORTUNATE

YOUTH.--We lament to wound the feelings of the friends of this young

man, but we are bound by a painful duty to caution the public against

an impostor, whose detected falsehoods, and disingenuous acts,

authorize the assertion, that there is not one word of truth in his

whole story."

This was pretty plain speaking, and brought forth a disclaimer from

"The Solicitor and Confidential Friend of 'The Fortunate Youth'

and his family," in which he says, "I will venture to assert that

this Youth has never defrauded, nor attempted to defraud, any one;

and that if any person has any just pecuniary claim upon him, the

liquidation of it will be immediately provided for, on such claim

being made known to me." Once again he wrote defending his client;

but alack, and well-a-day, a little time afterwards, in a letter to

the same Newspaper, he writes (giving his own name, Weatherby): "I

feel it now a duty I owe to the public to declare, that circumstances

have since occurred, which induce me to think that I have been

grossly deceived in my opinion of him, and that his pretensions to a

large property are without foundation."

The editor then gives the impostor's real story.

"This young man's name is ABRAHAM W. CAWSTON. His father is a farmer

at Chippenham, near Newmarket. The early promise of shining talents

induced his father to send him to school, under the tuition of the

eminent Dr. Butler, of Shrewsbury, and there his attainments and

abilities gained him universal admiration. He was not seventeen years

of age when he paid his addresses to a young lady of fortune in

that place, and from that time the strange artifice or imagination

of this enormous fortune that had dropped to him, as it were, from

the clouds, had birth. He first opened his wonderful secret to his

father; and the story which he told was, that an aged gentleman

had, at one of his journeys from home to school, fallen in with him

in a stage coach going to Birmingham, and that he afterwards made

him _a deed of gift_ of his whole fortune! It did not, in the first

disclosure, swell to the magnitude which it afterwards attained;

but the first feeling that he manifested was to settle a part of his

wealth on his parents and brother. For this purpose he was introduced

to Mr. Weatherby, to whom he gave instructions to make a will; and,

as his fortune was stated to be all personal, Mr. Weatherby saw no

objection to the deed. His distribution of wealth, though uncommon,

did not strike Mr. Weatherby as improbable, so clear and consistent

were the boy's statements in their different interviews, and so

filial, and brotherly, were the bequests.

"From this time, nothing could equal the romance of his story, the

unblushing effrontery with which he maintained it, and the ingenious

stratagems he devised to keep up the delusion. It would fill a

volume to recount the history of the youth for the last two months;

and we are possessed of so many curious anecdotes, that we shall

entertain our readers with the relation of a few of them, since

the affair has afforded a striking example of the courtesy which

is shown to appearance, and the eagerness with which a meteor is

contemplated in the hemisphere of rank and fashion. That tradesmen

of all descriptions should crowd round his doors for the advantage

of his orders, was natural; but that Bankers should contend for his

account--Duchesses for the honour of his acquaintance--and Ministers

for his Parliamentary support--prove how much all conditions of

Society are on the alert for gold and power.

"He prevailed on his father to enter his elder brother, who is

twenty-four years of age, and had been brought up in the line of

farming, as a fellow commoner of Emanuel College, Cambridge.

"He instructed one solicitor to enter into a negociation for the

purchase of several estates, and surveys had actually been made.

"He applied to Government for a grant to take the name and bear the

arms of Devereux, and the Herald's College had begun to take steps

to exemplify the arms, and waited only for information as to which

branch of the house of Devereux his benefactor belonged.

"He instructed another Solicitor to insert an advertisement in the

public papers, calling on the Creditors, if any, of Don Gaspar de

Quintilla, deceased, to bring vouchers of their demands, in order

that they might be immediately liquidated. (Meaning to couple him

with Don Joachim de Quintilla, a rich Portuguese diamond Merchant.)

"He stated that it was his determination to purchase ten Boroughs,

that he might have twenty Members of Parliament in the House of

Commons, to procure him an Earldom.

"He said that his half-year's dividend, due on the 5th of January

next, was £92,000, and that he held annuities from several of the

crowned heads of Europe to the amount of millions.

"He was in the habit of suffering drafts on bankers for thousands,

nay, at times for tens, and hundreds of thousands, to drop from

his pocket-book, as if by accident, that they might be seen; and

he talked of loans to persons of the highest distinction, on whose

estate he had mortgages.

"When strongly pressed for an explanation as to the _Deed of Gift_ by

which the Legacy Tax had been evaded, he said that it was a secret

which he was bound to conceal for a time, but it was in an iron

chest, buried in the garden of his benefactor.

"So entire was the conviction of his friends, as to the certainty,

and extent, of his wealth, that a consultation was held with two

eminent Lawyers, to devise the means of making him a Ward of

Chancery; and, as his wealth was all his own, and, consequently,

there was no ground for the interference of the Lord Chancellor, it

was settled that he should present £30,000 to his father, and file a

friendly bill, upon which application might be made to constitute him

a ward."

This is only a slight portion of the revelations made respecting him;

but, although highly amusing, the relation of them would occupy too

much space. I have not taken the trouble to try and find out what

became of him.

It is curious that this should have been the year of two notorious

and historical impostors. One we have just heard of: the other

was a hussey named Wilcox or Baker--who tried to ape the _rôle_ of

George Psalmanazar. Her story is on this wise. On the evening of

3rd April, 1817, the guardian of the poor brought a female, aged

about twenty-five, clothed in ordinary costume, although it was

somewhat fantastically put on, to Mrs. Worrall, of Knole Park, for

advice. She had been found in the neighbouring village of Almondsbury

(Gloucestershire), and had gone into a cottage, making signs that she

wished to rest and sleep there: but as there was something uncanny

about her, and she spoke no language they understood, she was taken

to the Great House. Mrs. Worrall very kindly sent a maid with her

to the village inn, where she slept that night. Next day she was

interviewed, but all that could be got out of her was some gibberish

no one could understand, and she kept pointing to herself, saying

"Caraboo," by which it was inferred that such was her name. She

was taken to Bristol and examined: many persons versed in Eastern

languages trying to converse with her, but failing--her language

being utterly unknown to them.

Mrs. Worrall then took her to her house at Knole, and afterwards, a

Portuguese Malay appeared on the scene, undoubtedly a confederate,

who could talk to her, and then it came out that she was a Malayan

princess, of Chinese origin, and that she came from _Javasu_

(wherever that may be). One day she was walking in her garden

attended by her women, when the crew of a pirate prahu landed,

scaled the walls, gagged her, bound her and carried her off! (_Red

fire. Curtain falls_).--Act II. She is now discovered in a state of

slavery--having been sold by the pirates to the captain of a brig,

from which ship she was transferred to another, where she found

company in the society of a few more female captives, who, after

five weeks' cruise, were landed at another port. Caraboo, however,

continues sailing the wild ocean for nearly three months, till,

nearing land, and preferring death to slavery, she jumps overboard!

(_Soft music. Curtain falls_).--Act III. A merciful Providence

watches over her, and she swims ashore, borne to a land to which

she is an utter stranger, wanders about for six weeks, and at last

finds herself in this village of Almondsbury, clad like a respectable

working woman, in stuff dress, bonnet, woollen socks, leather boots,

a piece of soap, and other necessaries in a bundle, and a few

halfpence and a bad sixpence in her pocket. Kind people befriended

her, she composed a new language, and wrote some of it. Suspicion

is aroused, other kind people take an interest in her, who trace

different antecedents for her; she is confronted with the friends of

her youth, and (counterpart of Rider Haggard's "She") the Princess

Caraboo of Javasu crumbles into Mary Baker, or Wilcox, of Witheridge,

in the county of Devon!!! (_Tableau. Curtain falls, hisses and

catcalls._)

She afterwards went, still in 1817, to America, but a New York paper

noticing her arrival at Philadelphia, remarked, "That her personal

charms will have their due weight here, we should be sorry in this

age of gallantry, to doubt; but as to any prospect of success which

the fair adventuress may promise herself in the way of _hoaxing_, she

will shortly discover, from the number of our _banking institutions_,

our _stones in cotton_, and _wooden nutmegs_, that we are already

adepts in her profession."

In the year 1824 she returned from America, and took apartments in

New Bond Street, where she publicly showed herself at a shilling a

head. She finally settled down at Bristol, where she sold leeches,

and died at the close of 1864.

Social England under the Regency, Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 7 / 16 章