in water and bathe his flesh and hold himself unclean till the even.
The assistant who fed the fire was in like manner unclean. These
were both to withdraw; and one who was clean was to gather the ashes
of the burning and, having provided some clean vessel within the
camp, he was to store up the purifying ashes for future use by the
people. Finally, the person who did this last duty, having become
tainted like the others, was to wash his clothes and be unclean for
the day. The ashes were to be used by mixing them with water to make
"water for pollution"; that is, water to take away pollution. Special
care was to be exercised that only living water, or water from a
flowing stream, should be used for this purpose. It was to be applied
to the defiled person, vessel, or tent, by means of hyssop. But,
again, the man who used the water of purification in this way was to
wash his clothes and be unclean until even.
Here we have an extra-sacerdotal rite, not of worship--for as
ordinarily used there was no prayer to God, nor perhaps even the
thought of appeal to God. It was religious, for the sense of defilement
belonged to religion; but when under the necessity of the occasion any
one applied the water of purification, his sense of acting the priestly
part was reduced to the lowest point. The efficacy came through the
action of the accredited priest when the heifer was sacrificed, it
might be a year previously. So, although provision was made for needs
occurring far from the sanctuary, no opening was left for any one
to claim the power belonging to the sacerdotal office. And in order
to make this still more sure it was enacted (ver. 21), that though
the sprinkled water of purification cleansed the unclean, any one
who touched it being himself clean should _de facto_ be defiled. The
water was declared so sacred that unless in cases where it was really
required no one would be disposed to meddle with it. The sanctity of
the tabernacle and the priesthood was symbolically carried forth to the
most distant parts of the land. All were to be on their guard lest they
should incur the judgment of God by abusing that which had ceremonial
holiness and power.
The idea here is in a sense directly opposite to that which we
associate with the sacred word, by which Divine will is communicated
and souls are begotten anew. To use that word, to make it known abroad
is the duty of every one who has heard and believed. He diffuses
blessing and is himself blessed. There is no strict law hedging about
with precautions the happy privilege of conveying to the sin-defiled
the message of forgiveness and life. And yet may we not call to
recollection here the words of Paul, "I buffet my body, and bring it
into bondage; lest by any means, after that I have preached to others,
I myself should be rejected." In a spiritual sense they should be clean
who bear the vessels of the Lord; and every deed done, every word
spoken in the sacred Name, if not with purity of purpose and singleness
of heart, involves in guilt him who acts and speaks. The privilege has
its accompanying danger; and the more widely it is used in the thousand
organisations within and without the Church, the more carefully do all
who use it need to guard the sanctity of the message and the Name. "In
a great house there are not only vessels of gold and silver, but also
of wood and of earth; and some unto honour, and some unto dishonour.
If a man therefore purge himself from these"--the profane babblings of
those who do not handle the word of God aright--"he shall be a vessel
unto honour, sanctified, meet for the Master's use, prepared unto every
good work."
3. DEFILEMENT BY THE DEAD.--The statute of the water of purification
stands closely related to one form of uncleanness, that occasioned
by death. When death took place in a tent, every one who came into
the tent and every one who was in the tent, every open vessel that
had no covering bound upon it, and the tent itself (ver. 18) were
defiled; and the taint could not be removed in less than seven days.
Whoever in the open field touched one who had been slain with a
sword, or had otherwise died, or touched the bone of a man, or a
grave--contracted like defilement. For purification the sacred water
had to be sprinkled on the defiled person, on the third day and again
on the seventh day. Not only the aspersion with sacred water, but,
in addition, cleansing of clothes and of the body was necessary, in
order to complete the removal of the taint. And further, while any
one was unclean from this cause, if he touched another, his touch
carried defilement that continued to the close of the day. To neglect
the statute of purification was to defile the tabernacle of Jehovah:
he who did so was to be cut off from his people.
The law was made stringent, as we have already seen, partly no doubt
for the purpose of preventing the spread of disease. And to that
extent the preservation of health was presented as a religious duty;
for only in that sense can we understand the statement that he who
did not purify himself defiled the tabernacle of Jehovah. Yet the
stringency cannot be altogether due to this, for a bone or a grave
would not often communicate infection. The general principle must be
received by way of explanation, that death is peculiarly repugnant to
the life of God, and therefore contact with it, in any form, takes
away the right of approach to the sanctuary. That this idea goes
back to the fall and the death penalty then pronounced might seem a
reasonable conclusion. But the same thought does not apply to the
defilement connected with birth. If the statute regarding uncleanness
by death rested on the connection of death with sin, making "death
and mortal corruption an embodiment of sin," the thought was obscured
by many other laws regarding uncleanness. The aim we must believe was
to make the theocratic oversight of the people penetrate as many as
possible of the incidents and contingencies of their existence.
XVI
_SORROW AND FAILURE AT KADESH_
NUMBERS xx
There is a mustering at Kadesh of the scattered tribes, for now the
end of the period of wandering approaches, and the generation that has
been disciplined in the wilderness must prepare for a new advance.
The spies who searched Canaan were sent from Kadesh (xiii. 26), to
which, in the second year from the exodus, the tribes had penetrated.
Now, in the first month of the fortieth year it would seem, Kadesh is
again the headquarters. The adjacent district is called the desert of
Zin. Eastward, across the great plain of the Arabah, reaching from the
Dead Sea to the Elanitic Gulf, are the mountains of Seir, the natural
rampart of Edom. To the head of the Gulf at Elath the distance is some
eighty miles in a straight line southward; to the southern end of the
Dead Sea it is about fifty miles. Kadesh is almost upon the southern
border of Canaan; but the way of the Negeb is barred by defeat, and
Israel must enter the Promised Land by another route. In preparation
for the advance the tribes gather from the wadies and plateaus in
which they have been wandering, and at Kadesh or near it the earlier
incidents of this chapter occur.
First among them is the death of Miriam. She has survived the
hardships of the desert and reached a very great age. Her time of
influence and vigour past, all the joys of life now in the dim
memories of a century, she is glad, no doubt, when the call comes.
It was her happiness once to share the enthusiasm of Moses and to
sustain the faith of the people in their leader and in God. But any
service of this kind she could render has been left behind. For some
time she has been able only now and then with feeble steps to move to
the tent of meeting that she might assure herself of the welfare of
Moses. The tribes will press on to Canaan, but she shall never see it.
How is a life like this of Miriam's to be reckoned? Take into
account her faith and her faithfulness; but remember that both were
maintained with some intermixture of poor egotism; that while she
helped Moses she also claimed to rival and rebuke him; that while
she served Jehovah it was with some of the pride of a prophetess.
Her devotion, her endurance, the long interest in her brother's
work, which indeed led to the great error of her life--these were
her virtues, the old great virtues of a woman. So far as opportunity
went she doubtless did her utmost, with some independence of thought
and decision of character. Even though she gave way to jealousy and
passed beyond her right, we must believe that, on the whole, she
served her generation in loyalty to the best she knew, and in the
fear of the Most High. But into what a strange disturbed current of
life was her effort thrown! Downcast, sorely burdened women, counting
for very little when they were cheerful or when they complained,
heard Miriam's words and took them into their narrow thoughts, to
resent her enthusiasm, perhaps, when she was enthusiastic, to grudge
her the power she enjoyed, which to herself seemed so slight. In
the camp generally she had respect, and perhaps, once and again,
she was able to reconcile to Moses and to one another those whose
quarrels threatened the common peace. When she was put forth from
the camp in the shame of her leprosy, all were affected, and the
march was stayed till her time of separation was over. Was she one of
those women whose lot it is to serve others all their lives and to
have little for their service? Still, like many another, she helped
to make Israel. Of good and evil, of Divine elements and some that
are anything but Divine, lives are made up. And although we cannot
gather the results of any one and tell its worth, the stream of being
retains and the unerring judgment of God accepts whatever is sincere
and good. Miriam from first to last fills but a few lines of sacred
history; yet of her life, as of others, more has to be told; the end
did not come when she died at Kadesh and was buried outside Canaan.
* * * * *
Spread through a diversified and not altogether barren region, over
many square miles, the tribes have been able during the thirty-seven
years to provide themselves with water. Gathered more closely now,
when the dry season begins they are in want. And at once complaints
are renewed. Nor can we wonder much. In flaming sunshine, in the
parched air of the heights and the stifling heat of the narrow valleys,
the cattle gasping and many of them dying, the children crying in
vain for water, the little that is to be had, hot and almost putrid,
carefully divided, yet insufficient to give each family a little,--the
people might well lament their apparently inevitable fate. It may be
said, "They should have confided in God." But while that might apply
in ordinary circumstances, would not be out of place if the whole
history were ideal, the reality, once understood, forbids so easy a
condemnation of unbelief. Nothing is more terrible to endure, nothing
more fitted to make strong men weep or turn them into savage critics of
a leader and of Providence, than to see their children in the extremity
of want which they cannot relieve. And a leader like Moses, patient as
he may have been of other complaints, should have been most patient of
this. When the people chode with him and said, "Would God that we had
died when our brethren died before the Lord! And why have ye brought
the assembly of the Lord into this wilderness, that we should die,
we and our cattle?" they ought surely to have been met with pity and
soothing words.
It is indeed a tragedy we are to witness when we come to the rock;
and one element of it is the old age and the weary spirit of the
leader. Who can tell what vexed his soul that day? how many cares
and anxieties burdened the mind that was clear yet, but not so
tolerant, perhaps, as once it had been? The years of Moses, his
long and arduous service of the people, are not remembered as they
ought to be. Even in their extremity the men of the tribes ought
to have appealed to their great chief with all respect, instead of
breaking in upon him with reproaches. Was no experience sufficient
for these people? After the discipline of the wilderness, was the new
generation, like that which had died, still a mere horde, ungrateful,
rebellious? From the leader's point of view this thought could not
fail to arise, and the old magnanimity did not drive it away.
Another point is the forbearance of Jehovah, who has no anger with
the people. The Divine Voice commands Moses to take his rod and go
forth to the rock and speak to it before the assembly. This does not
fall in with Moses' mood. Why is God not indignant with the men of
this new generation who seize the first opportunity to begin their
murmuring? Relapsing from his high inspiration to a poor human level,
Moses begins to think that Jehovah, whose forgiveness he has often
implored on Israel's behalf, is too ready now to forgive. It is a
failing of the best men thus to stand for the prerogative of God
more than God Himself; that is, to mistake the real point of the
circumstances they judge and the Divine will they should interpret.
The story of Jonah shows the prophet anxious that Nineveh, the
inveterate foe of Israel, the centre of proud, God-defying idolatry,
should be destroyed. Does God wish it to be spared, to repent and
obtain forgiveness? So does not Jonah. His creed is one of doom
for wickedness. He resents the Divine mercy and, in effect, exalts
himself above the Most High. In like temper is Moses when he goes out
followed by the crowd. There is the rock from which water shall be
made to flow. But with the thought in his mind that the people do not
deserve God's help, Moses takes the affair upon himself. The tragedy
is fulfilled when his own feelings guide him more than the Divine
patience, his own displeasure more than the Divine compassion; and
with the words on his lips, "Hear now, ye rebels; shall we bring you
forth water out of this rock?" he smites it twice with his rod.
For the moment, forgetting Jehovah the merciful, Moses will himself
act God; and he misrepresents God, dishonours God, as every one
who forgets Him is sure to do. Is he confident in the power of his
wonder-working rod? Does he wish to show that its old virtue remains?
He will use it as if he were smiting the people as well as the rock.
Is he willing that this thirsting multitude should drink? Yet he is
determined to make them feel that they offend by the urgency with which
they press upon him for help. There have been crises in the lives of
leaders of men when, with all the teaching of the past to inspire them,
they should have risen to a faith in God far greater than they ever
exercised before; and more or less they have failed. This is not the
will of Providence, they have thought, though they should have known
that it was. They have said, "Advance: but God goes not with you," when
they should have seen the heavenly light moving on. So Moses failed. He
touched his limit; and it was far short of that breadth of compassion
which belongs to the Most Merciful. He stood as God, with the rod in
his hand to give the water, but with the condemnation upon his lips
which Jehovah did not speak.
In this mood of assumed majesty, of moral indignation which has a
personal source, with an air of superiority not the simplicity of
inspiration, a man may do what he will for ever regret, may betray a
habit of self-esteem which has been growing upon him and will be his
ruin if it is not checked. In the strong mind of Moses there had lain
the germs of hauteur. The early upbringing in an Egyptian court could
not fail to leave its mark, and the dignity of a dictator could not be
sustained, after the anxieties of the first two years in the desert,
without some slight growth of a tendency or disposition to look down
on people so spiritless, and play among them the part of Providence,
the decrees of which Moses had so often interpreted. But pride, even
beginning to show itself towards men, is an aping of God. Unconsciously
the mind that looks down on the crowd falls into the trick of a
superhuman claim. Moses, great as he is, without personal ambition, the
friend of every Israelite, reaches unaware the hour when a habit long
suppressed lifts itself into power. He feels himself the guardian of
justice, a critic not only of the lives of men but of the attitude of
Jehovah towards them. It is but for an hour; yet the evil is done. What
appears to the uplifted mind justice, is arrogance. What is meant for a
defence of Jehovah's right, is desecration of the highest office a man
can hold under the Supreme. The words are spoken, the rock is struck in
pride; and Moses has fallen.
Think of the realisation of this which comes when the flush of hasty
resentment dies, and the true self which had been suppressed revives
in humble thought. "What have I done?" is the reflection--"What have
I said? My rod, my hand, my will, what are they? My indignation!
Who gave me the right to be indignant? A king against whom they
have revolted! A guardian of the Divine honour! Alas! I have denied
Jehovah. I, who stood for Him in my pride, have defamed Him in my
vanity. The people who murmured, whom I rebuked, have sinned less
than I. They distrusted God, I have declared Him unmerciful, and
thereby sown the seeds of distrust. Now I, too, am barred from
Israel's inheritance. Unworthy of the promise, I shall never cross
the border of God's land. Aaron my brother, we are the transgressors.
Because we have not honoured God to sanctify Him in the eyes of the
children of Israel, therefore we shall not bring this assembly unto
the land He gives them." By the lips of Moses himself the oracle was
given. It was tragical indeed.
But how could the brothers who had yielded to this dictatorial
hierarchical temper be men of God again, fit for another stroke of
work for Him, unless, coming forth into action, their pride had
disclosed itself, and with whatever bad result shown its real nature?
We deplore the pride; we almost weep to see its manifestation; we
hear with sorrow the judgment of Moses and Aaron. But well is it
that the worst should come to light, that the evil thing should be
seen, God-dishonoring, sacrilegious; should be judged, repented of,
punished. Moses must "feel himself and find the blessedness of being
little." "By that sin fell the angels," that sin unconfessed. Here in
open sight of all, in hearing of all, Moses lays down the godhead he
had assumed, acknowledges unworthiness, takes his place humbly among
those who shall not inherit the promise. The worst of all happens
to a man when his pride remains unrevealed, uncondemned; grows to
more and more, and he never discovers that he is attempting to carry
himself with the air of Providence, of Divinity.
The error of Moses was great, yet only showed him to be a man of like
passions with ourselves. Who can realise the mercy and lovingkindness
that are in the heart of God, the danger of limiting the Holy One of
Israel? The murmuring of the Israelites against Jehovah had often
been rebuked, had often brought them into condemnation. Moses had
once and again intervened as their mediator and saved them from
death. Remembering the times when he had to speak of Jehovah's
anger, he feels himself justified in his own resentment. He thought
the murmuring was over; it is resumed unexpectedly, the same old
complaints are made and he is carried away by what appears zeal for
Jehovah. Yet there is in him even, the man, much more in God, a
better than the seeming best. Pathetic indeed is it to find Moses
judged as one who has failed from the high place he could have
reached by a final effort of self-mastery, one more generous thought.
And we see him fail at a point where we often fail. Sternly to judge
our own right of condemning before we speak sternly in the name of
God; neither to do nor say anything which implies the assumption of
knowledge, justice, charity we do not possess--how few of us are
in these respects blameless for a day! Far back in sacred history
this high duty is presented so as to evoke the best endeavour of the
Christian soul and warn it from the place of failure.
* * * * *
There is preserved in the Book of Exodus (xxxvi.) a list of the Kings
of Edom reaching down apparently to about the establishment of the
monarchy of Israel. Recent archæology sees no reason to question the
genuineness of this historical notice or the names of the Dukes of
Edom given in the same passage. With varying boundaries the region
over which they ruled extended southward from Moab and the Dead Sea
as far as the Elanitic Gulf. Kadesh, considerably west of the Arabah,
is described as being on its uttermost border. But the district
inhabited by the Edomites proper was a narrow strip of rugged country
eastward of the range of Mount Seir. One pass giving entrance to the
heart of Edom led by the base of Mount Hor towards Selah, afterwards
called Petra, which occupied a fine but narrow valley in the heart of
broken mountains. To reach the south of Moab the Israelites desired
probably to take a road a good deal farther north. But this would
have led them by Bozrah the capital, and the king who reigned at the
time refused them the route. The message sent him in Moses' name
was friendly, even appealing. The brotherhood of Edom and Israel was
claimed; the sore travail of the tribes in Egypt and the deliverance
wrought by Jehovah were given as reasons; promise was made that no
harm should be done to field or vineyard: Israel would journey by
the king's way turning neither to the right nor the left. When the
first request was refused Moses added that if his people drank of the
water while passing through Edom they would pay for it. The appeal,
however, was made in vain. An attempt to advance without permission
was repelled. An armed force barred the way, and most reluctantly the
desert road was again taken.
We can easily understand the objection of the King of Edom. Many of
the defiles through which the main road wound were not adapted for
the march of a great multitude. The Israelites could scarcely have
gone through Edom without injuring the fields and vineyards; and
though the undertaking was given in good faith by Moses, how could
he answer for the whole of that undisciplined host he was leading
towards Canaan? The safety of Edom lay in denying to other peoples
access to its strongholds. The difficulty of approaching them was
their main security. Israel might go quietly through the land now;
but its armies might soon return with hostile intent. Water, too,
was very precious in some parts of Edom. Enough was stored in the
rainy season to supply the wants of the inhabitants; beyond that
there was none to spare, and for this necessary of life money was
no equivalent. A multitude travelling with cattle would have made
scarcity, or famine,--might have left the region almost desolate.
With the information they had, Moses and Joshua may have believed
that there were no insuperable difficulties. Yet the best generalship
might have been unequal to the task of controlling Israel in the
passes and among the cultivated fields of that singular country.