usually be the case, the solution being set out to crystallise in a
quiet and protected place on the previous afternoon or evening, the
slight fall of temperature during the night gently assists the process
and almost ensures a good crop of a few well-formed crystals large
enough for goniometrical purposes next morning. They should be removed
before the temperature begins to rise again with the advent of the sun,
dried with blotting paper and by air exposure for a short time, and
stored in a miniature bottle labelled with the name or formula of the
substance and the date of collection of the crop. In such cases the
labile state is never reached, and the course of the crystallisation is
represented by the curve BE. The whole conditions for the curve ABE,
however, would correspond to much lower temperatures, such as those
given at the foot of the diagram below the word “temperature,” rather
than to the upper row of temperature abscissæ suitable for the other
purposes of the diagram already referred to. Crystallisation might well
begin about 13° or 14°, as shown at B, and the liquid would cool a
couple of degrees or more during the night while crystallisation was
steadily proceeding, until equilibrium was reached at E on the
solubility curve.
The diagram does not represent any substance in particular, but is a
perfectly general one, corresponding to the facts observed with most of
the very varied salts worked with by Miers and those of which the author
has had experience. The exact temperatures and concentrations will, of
course, differ for each substance.
A beautiful experimental demonstration of crystallisation from the
metastable and labile conditions of solution respectively is afforded by
potassium bichromate, K_{2}Cr_{2}O_{7}. When deposited slowly from a
metastable solution under conditions of quietude, this salt is slowly
deposited in bright orange coloured and excellently formed crystals,
often of considerable size, belonging to the triclinic system of
symmetry; they are bounded by good pinakoidal (pairs of parallel) faces
intersecting in sharp edges. But when the crystallisation occurs from a
labile solution, being much more rapid, it takes the form of feathery or
arborescent branching skeletal growths, there being inadequate time for
the formation of well-developed crystals.
Fig. 99, Plate XXI., is a photographic reproduction of well-formed
crystals of potassium bichromate, grown from a solution in the
metastable condition on a microscope slip, just as they are seen through
the microscope in the slow act of formation, employing a 1½ inch
objective. The crystallisation had been started by germ crystals of the
salt falling in from the air, after which the drop, placed within the
ring of hardened gold size on the slide, had been covered with a
cover-glass, under which the crystallisation had proceeded with
sufficient slowness to enable a successful photograph to be taken, when
the camera was subsequently attached above the vertically arranged
microscope. An upright micrographic apparatus had been designed by the
author specially for this photography of growing crystals, many of the
results of which are reproduced in this book.
[Illustration:
_PLATE XXI._
FIG. 99.—Potassium Bichromate slowly crystallising from a Metastable
Solution.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 100.—Potassium Bichromate rapidly crystallised from a Labile
Solution.
CHARACTERISTIC DIFFERENCE IN THE CRYSTALS DEPOSITED FROM METASTABLE
AND LABILE SOLUTIONS.
]
Fig. 100 is the reproduction of another photograph taken under similar
conditions, but employing a hot and somewhat more concentrated solution
of potassium bichromate, and making the exposure at the moment when, in
the particular field chosen, a rapid labile crystallisation was just
completing itself, the rapidity of growth of the feathery skeletal
crystals having just become arrested. Indeed, the branches are
frequently terminated by small well-formed crystals, the rapid growth
having been succeeded by a final slow crystallisation where the solution
had discharged its labile excess and attained once more the metastable
condition.
This experiment with potassium bichromate lends itself admirably to
lantern demonstration with the projection microscope. When the drop of
hot concentrated solution is first placed on the warmed microscope slip,
and the latter laid on the stage, nothing visible on the screen happens
for a minute or two, the solution becoming, however, more or less
rapidly cooled. But suddenly, the drop having cooled sufficiently to
bring the solution to the labile condition of supersaturation
corresponding to the conditions for spontaneous crystallisation
indicated by the supersolubility curve, arborescent or feathery growths
begin to shoot out from various points in the field, often near the
margin, and traverse the screen so rapidly that in a moment or two it is
filled with them. The crystallisation then slows down once more, the
labile shower of excess having become exhausted, and the terminations of
the branches and ramifications begin to develop into good little
crystals, which thus hang like fruit on a tree. The experiment is
rendered the more brilliant and beautiful by the bright orange colour of
the crystals.
In Fig. 101, Plate XI., facing page 88, a reproduction of a photograph
of a similar crystallisation from a labile solution of ammonium chloride
is given. This salt is also particularly suitable for screen
demonstrations. The beautiful skeletal ramifications follow the axial
directions of the cubic axes, ammonium chloride crystallising in the
pentagonal-icositetrahedral class of the cubic system. Good crystals
may, however, be very slowly grown from metastable solutions, and they
usually exhibit as the principal forms the icositetrahedron
(predominating), cube, octahedron, rhombic dodecahedron, and the
class-distinguishing pentagonal icositetrahedron. The rapid growths by
spontaneous crystallisation of labile solutions, however, invariably
take the form of the rectangularly branching feathery crystals shown in
Fig. 101.
Further light has been thrown on the act of crystallisation by another
most interesting research of Miers concerning “vicinal faces,”[21] such
as the three very low pyramid faces (forming a very flat triakis
octahedron) which often replace each octahedron face on a crystal of
alum which has been grown somewhat rapidly. The author has frequently
observed this phenomenon in the course of the numerous crystallisations
required for the investigation of the sulphates and selenates. It may be
described in general terms as the replacement of primary faces
possessing the simplest rational indices by faces having such high
indices that it is doubtful whether they ought really to be represented
by indices at all. The number of such vicinal faces which replace the
simple face depends on the symmetry of the crystal, to which, of course,
they conform. Thus, while three such vicinal faces replace an octahedral
face, and two replace the face of a tetragonal prism, the simple primary
prism face of a rhombic or monoclinic crystal would only be replaced by
one, which may have a deformation of as much as even 30′ from the
correct position of the prism face, and on either side of it. Indeed it
is possible for a whole succession of such vicinal faces to be developed
within the degree of arc which may in extreme cases separate the
limiting values on each side of the prism face, and such are often seen
and make up the well-known bundle of images afforded on the goniometer
by a bad face, a face which would cause the author at once to reject the
whole crystal for measurement purposes. One of the faces, even in cases
such as alum or a tetragonal crystal, where three or two might have
equal values as regards the symmetry, generally predominates, and
affords a very much more brilliant image of the goniometer signal than
the others in the bundle, so that an unwary observer might easily come
to the conclusion that this was the really valid image corresponding to
the octahedron face or to the simple primary prism face, or whatever
particular face was expected in the neighbourhood indicated by the
bundle of images. Obviously, however, it might only be one of three or
two equally valid faces of a vicinal form, which had grown
predominatingly during the last period of growth previous to removal
from the mother liquor.
The explanation of this interesting phenomenon of the production of
vicinal faces is one intimately connected with the structure of
crystals, and it forms one of the strongest confirmations of the
correctness of the theory of crystal structure the basis of which is the
molecular space-lattice. Miers is in full agreement with the author in
emphasising the importance of the space-lattice formed by the “points”
representative of the molecules, and analogously chosen in the
molecules. He says: “Whatever structures may be necessary to account for
other features of crystals, there is little doubt that we are justified
in regarding their faces as the planes of a space-lattice.”[22] Now
Wulff,[23] who has contributed very considerably to our knowledge of the
nature of the act of crystallisation, has proved, from his own
investigations and those of Weyberg, carried out at his suggestion in
his laboratory at Warsaw,[24] that faces of greatest reticular density,
that is, those along which the points of the space-lattice are most
thickly strewn, are those which grow the most slowly, and therefore are
the best developed. This latter will be obvious on a little
consideration, for the faces of less reticular density which grow more,
tend in doing so to extend the boundaries of the faces of greatest
reticular density, and thus to enlarge those faces. Hence the usual
planes on a crystal must be those of high reticular density; and these
are such as are represented by the simplest indices, the faces most
dense of all in points being the primary ones.
But it has been shown from the researches of Miers that vicinal faces
are often produced in preference to these simple index planes of high
density, and such vicinal faces, although the nearest (in angular
position) of all possible faces to those simple index planes, are
themselves of excessively low reticular density, so much so that if
represented by indices at all they can only be indicated by very high
numbers, not such as we are accustomed to consider as in keeping with
the simple spirit of the law of rational indices. Taking the example
worked out most fully by Miers, the octahedral crystals of alum, it is a
fact that the cubic faces of highest reticular density are those of the
cube itself, then come in order those of the rhombic dodecahedron and
those of the octahedron. Hence, the density of octahedral faces is very
high. But those of the very low triakis octahedron, which Miers finds to
replace the octahedron faces so frequently as vicinal faces, are of
excessively low reticular density.
Miers explains the appearance of the latter instead of octahedral faces
by assuming that the supersaturated liquid in contact with the growing
crystal consists of the particles (molecules) of salt uniformly mingled
with those of water, the solvent, and that the act of crystallisation
consists of the escape of the water and solidification of the salt.
Consequently, the salt particles just before crystallisation cannot be
so dense as they are along primary planes of the crystal, as they are
separated by the water particles, which are presumably much more
numerous. Hence it is that they are not deposited along the planes of
high reticular density, but along vicinal planes of low density of
points. For instance, he shows that the shower of salt particles upon a
cube face would have to be so dense that there would be insufficient
room for the water particles. The density in a cube face is 114 times as
great as that in one of the vicinal planes observed. Now, 100 cubic
centimetres of solid alum weigh 172 grammes, and 100 c.c. of the
solution depositing crystals contain 9·74 grammes of alum. Thus the
density of the growing crystal of alum is nearly 18 times that of the
alum in the adjacent saturated solution.
Consequently the deposition of the salt particles, in a moderately quick
crystallisation, when insufficient time is afforded for the deliberate
escape of the water particles and for the orderly rearrangement of the
salt particles, occurs along vicinal planes instead of along the primary
planes. For it must not be forgotten that whenever it has the
opportunity of coming into operation there is a directive molecular
force of some kind, which controls the operation of crystallisation, and
which undoubtedly attempts to cause, and given adequate time and scope
succeeds in causing, the production of faces of high reticular density,
the fundamentally important primary faces of lowest indices, and which
are often those along which cleavage occurs. Wulff emphasises this in
saying (_loc. cit._, p. 461): “Bei der Krystallisation orientiren sich
die Molekeln auf den Flächen des Krystalles ganz gleichförmig durch den
Einfluss der Richtkraft der Krystallisation.” The more rapidly the
crystallisation occurs, however, the less chance is there for this force
to attain its ultimate object. More will be said about this directive
force in the next chapter, after we have studied the remarkable “liquid
crystals” discovered by Lehmann.
This highly interesting explanation of Miers, supported as it is by the
work of Wulff, and confirmed also in many respects by the observations
of the author, whose great aim throughout his investigations has been to
avoid the production of such vicinal faces, throws an important light on
the nature of the act of crystallisation. It renders the reason clear
why crystals which are very slowly grown from solutions only feebly
supersaturated and under conditions of absolute rest, protected from
either air currents or preventable earth tremors—conditions which the
author has taken quite exceptional pains to procure for the preparation
of the crystals used in the investigation of the sulphates and selenates
of the rhombic simple salt series and monoclinic double salt series—are
occasionally obtained quite free from any sign of such vicinal faces.
They are small perfect individuals exhibiting primarily the faces of
high reticular density, that is, the faces of the simple forms of low
rational indices; and these faces are absolutely plane, affording one
single brilliant image of the goniometer signal, which can be adjusted
with great precision to the cross-wires of the telescope. For the slower
the growth, the more time is afforded for the escape of the water
molecules, and for the salt molecules to deposit themselves as directed
by the molecular guiding force of crystallisation, along the planes of
high reticular density. In many of his experiments Miers expressly
stirred the solution, to prevent concentration currents, which had been
considered by Wulff of importance in the process, from coming into play
and causing unknown effects. Hence his experiments in which vicinal
faces were produced are not comparable with the author’s slow growths.
The work of Miers assists in the proof that the constancy of angle to
within one or two minutes of arc is a real property of the crystals of a
substance. For previously the frequent presence of vicinal faces rather
than the simple forms of high reticular density, and which had been
mistaken for the latter, had caused Pfaff in 1878[25] and others to
conclude that variations from the true crystal angle amounting to as
much as 30′ were of common occurrence as the result of strain during
deposition.
Brauns[26] in 1887 made a careful series of measurements of very good
octahedral crystals of lead nitrate, and found 13′ 20″ the largest
deviation of a good image from the theoretical position. He imputed it
to the action of gravity as a disturbing cause during deposition. The
researches of Miers have cleared away all this misconception, in proving
that the bright images referred to, taken for those of the simple
primary form, are not such at all, but vicinal faces of very low
reticular density.
CHAPTER XVI
LIQUID CRYSTALS.
We have seen in the foregoing pages that a crystal is usually a solid,
highly organised in a homogeneous manner, and, unless the symmetry be
developed to its highest extent, the crystal then belonging to the cubic
system, it is also in general anisotropic, that is, it exhibits double
refraction. Section-plates of it, more or less thin according to the
strength of the double refraction, exhibit colours in parallel polarised
light, and show the phenomenon of a single optic axis, or of two optic
axes, in convergent polarised light. Every variety of hardness, however,
is displayed, from that of the diamond down to that of a crystal as soft
as gypsum, and even softer. Moreover, many of the softer crystallised
substances develop the property of permitting one layer to glide over
another by gentle side pressure with a knife blade, when inserted in an
edge or face in an attempt to cut the crystal. Calcite and ice, for
instance, both possess such planes of gliding of the structural units
over one another in layers. There are also the border line cases of
crystals so soft as to be readily bent, and many well-known viscous
substances crystallisable only with great difficulty, some of which form
pliable crystals.
But in the year 1876 Lehmann discovered a new property in an already
remarkable substance, iodide of silver, AgI, namely, that at
temperatures superior to 146° C. it can flow like a viscous liquid,
while exhibiting several of the properties which are characteristic of
crystals. Silver iodide is dimorphous, exhibiting a hexagonal form at
the ordinary temperature, which persists up to 146°. But during the
heating to the latter temperature a regularly accelerating diminution of
volume occurs, the feeble expansion in directions perpendicular to the
axis being overbalanced by a considerable contraction along the axis,
both quantities having been accurately measured so long ago as the year
1867 by Fizeau, by means of his delicate interference dilatometer. This
contraction, so unusual an occurrence with increase of temperature,
culminates at 146°, according to Mallard and Le Chatelier, in a sudden
change of condition into a cubic modification, accompanied by absorption
of heat. Now Lehmann, studying this cubic modification of silver iodide
under a microscope which he had devised—specially adapted for
observations at temperatures higher than the ordinary, by being supplied
with the means of heating the object under observation—found that it was
not only plastic, but actually a liquid.
[Illustration:
FIG. 102.—Lehmann’s Crystallisation Microscope.
]
The form of Lehmann’s “Crystallisation Microscope,” as now constructed
by Zeiss, is shown in Fig. 102. Its essential features are that the
glass object-plate, which is somewhat wider than the usual microscope 3
by 1 inches slip, is supported by little metallic columns at a height an
inch or more above the ordinary stage, and may be heated from below by a
miniature Bunsen burner, which is provided with a delicate graduated
gas-tap and is adjustable for its position, swinging in or out as
desired. The small Bunsen flame may be converted into a blowpipe flame
if necessary, an air-blast attachment to a mixing reservoir being
provided, to which the arm of the burner is hinged. Two cooling blasts,
connected with a gas-holder of air, are also provided, and are
adjustable to the most suitable symmetrical positions above the slide
for directing the cooling air on the part of the latter where the liquid
is situated. These arrangements enable the substance on the slide to be
rapidly or slowly heated or cooled at will. Electric connections are
also provided, in the event of the observer desiring to study the
behaviour of the liquid crystals under the influence of the electric
current.
Considerably later, in the year 1889, the attention of Lehmann was
called by Reinitzer to another similarly singular substance, cholesteryl
benzoate, which appeared to consist of an aggregate of minute crystals
which flow as readily as oil, while preserving many of the characters of
crystals.
In the next year, 1890, the substance para-azoxyphenetol, then recently
discovered by Gattermann, was observed by Lehmann to form a turbid
“melt” on fusion, which consisted of an aggregate of crystals flowing
with a mobility equal to that of water, and which take the form of
spherical drops showing a dark kernel inside, as shown at _a_ in Fig.
103, quite unlike a drop of ordinary liquid. The kernel disappears on
shaking, but reappears on coming to rest again. In polarised light the
drops show dichroism, that is two different colours in different parts
or directions, being divided into white and yellow parts, the yellow as
a pair of opposite approximately 60°-sectors, as indicated at _c_ in
Fig. 103. Under crossed Nicols they show a black cross, as represented
at _d_ in Fig. 103.
Now obviously these drops are doubly refractive, and their whole optical
behaviour corresponds to the arrangement of the molecules in concentric
circles, such as that suggested at _b_ in Fig. 103.
[Illustration:
FIG. 103.—Liquid Crystals of Para-azoxy-phenetol arranged in Spherical
Drops.
]
Another substance of like character, para-azoxy-anisol, was subsequently
found to behave similarly, and forms an excellent substance to use for
demonstration purposes. A reproduction of a photograph, kindly sent to
the author by Prof. Lehmann, of a slide of this substance is given in
Fig. 104, Plate XXII. It shows a characteristic field of such drops,
exhibiting white parts and yellow sectorial parts which photograph dark,
of para-azoxy-anisol mixed with a little para-azoxy-phenetol, oil and
resin (colophony), as seen under the polarising microscope with crossed
Nicols.
The next and possibly most interesting step in this remarkable series of
discoveries was made by Lehmann himself in the year 1894. He alighted on
the fact that ammonium oleate, crystallised from solution in alcohol,
affords a splendid example of flowing crystals, which are sufficiently
large to enable their habits to be studied in detail. The individuals
are almost invisible in ordinary light, owing to the refractive index of
the crystals and of the mother liquor being approximately the same. But
in polarised light, using crossed Nicols, they are clearly revealed as
steep double pyramids with more or less rounded edges. Their section is
nearly circular in consequence, and they exhibit optical properties of a
uniaxial character, the optic axis being that of the double cone or
bipyramid. A characteristic individual is shown at _e_ in Fig. 105. When
two of these flowing crystals approach each other, as at _a_ in Fig.
105, they coalesce to form a larger single individual, as is indicated
in stages at _b_, _c_, and _d_ in the illustration.
[Illustration:
FIG. 105.—Liquid Crystals of Ammonium Oleate.
]
When the cover-glass, under which they are growing on a microscope 3 by
1 inch slip, is moved to and fro so as to distort these remarkable
bodies, which we may well hesitate to call crystals, the singular effect
is produced of causing them all to become similarly orientated, for the
extinction directions follow the direction of the pressure. They at once
seek to regain their original form, however, on cessation of the
disturbance. A slide of the bipyramids under pressure is shown in Fig.
106. In the black extinguished portions of the field the flowing
crystals are flattened, according to Lehmann, and arranged so that the
optic axis is in all cases perpendicular to the tabular crystals and the
glass plates and parallel to the axis of the microscope. The black parts
are separated by oily strips, as shown in another slide under
considerable pressure, represented in Fig. 107, which are composed of
the tabular crystals standing on end, with their optic axes parallel to
the plates. These strips polarise the more brightly the more truly the
crystals stand perpendicularly to the plates. The two conditions are
shown diagrammatically at _a_ and _b_ in Fig. 108.
[Illustration:
FIG. 106.—Liquid Crystals of Ammonium Oleate under slight pressure.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 107.—Ammonium Oleate under considerable pressure.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 108.—Diagrammatic Representation of Arrangement of Molecules.
]
Lehmann believes the explanation of these singular phenomena to be that
the “liquid crystals” of ammonium oleate are composed of piles or layers
of thin plates perpendicular to the optic axis. Disturbance detaches the
plates from their piled positions over one another, and sets them
parallel to the glass plate, except in places, the oily strips, where
the plates stand upright, perpendicularly to the micro-slip and
cover-glass. Lehmann, indeed, goes further, and asserts that the
molecules themselves are anisotropic, and probably take the form of
plates.
[Illustration:
FIG. 109.—A Crystal of Ammonium Oleate A, broken at B, each part
repairing itself at C, perfect again at D.
]
An extremely interesting experimental observation of Lehmann’s with the
bipyramids of ammonium oleate is, that if one of them, for instance A in
Fig. 109, be broken into two parts, as at B, each part grows again and
completely repairs itself, becoming once more a perfect double pyramid,
as indicated in stages at C and D in the figure.
[Illustration:
FIG. 110.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 111.
Cruciform, Boomerang, and Arrow-head Twins of Ammonium Oleate.
]
[Illustration:
_PLATE XXII._
FIG. 104.
Dichroic Crystal Drops of Para-azoxy-anisol.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 112.
Rectilinear Liquid Prisms of Para-azoxy-benzoic Acid.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 115.—Tetragonal Astatic Magnet-system.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 116.—Cubic Astatic Magnet-system.
]
Twins of ammonium oleate are also shown in Figs. 110 and 111, the former
figure representing a twin of cruciform character, and the latter
exhibiting twins resembling a boomerang and an arrowhead respectively.
This substance, ammonium oleate, thus appears to be one of the most
remarkable and interesting of all the bodies yet observed to afford
liquid crystals. Many other oleates produce liquid crystals also, but
the ammonium salt is by far the most striking, and very convincing as to
the reality of Lehmann’s discovery.
Another substance of a different nature was discovered by Vorländer in
the year 1904, namely, the ethyl ester of para-azoxy-benzoic acid. A
characteristic microscope slide of it in ordinary light is shown in Fig.
112, Plate XXII., which is a reproduction of an actual photograph most
generously sent to the author by Prof. Lehmann.
The individuals are described by Lehmann, who further studied the nature
of the substance, as almost perfectly rectilinear prisms with nearly
sharply defined basal plane end faces. A singular fact about this
substance is, that when two individuals approach each other they arrange
themselves parallel with a jerk, and then flow into each other,
producing a single larger liquid crystal, and often with such rapidity
that the eye can scarcely follow the movements. These coalescences
appear to be occurring all over the field at once, with the production
of larger and larger crystals. Indeed, Lehmann likens it to a struggle
between the innumerable individuals, in which the smaller ones are being
continually eaten up by the larger.
Vorländer also prepared the ethyl ester of para-azoxy-cinnamic acid, and
Lehmann found it to be similarly interesting. The substance separates
from a solution in monobromonaphthalene in uniaxial prisms or
hemimorphic pyramids, the edges and solid angles of which are more or
less rounded, and which appear colourless in the direction of the axis
and yellow in all other directions. When pressed between the cover-glass
and the micro-slip on which the crystallisation is proceeding,
extinction of the light occurs throughout the whole mass when polarised
light is being employed and the Nicols are crossed. For throughout the
entire substance the particles—whether they are the molecules themselves
as Lehmann asserts or aggregations of them in the form of
ultramicroscopic crystals—arrange themselves with their optic axes (the
crystals being uniaxial) perpendicular to the cover-glass and
micro-slip, as in the case of ammonium oleate. Lehmann’s theory is that
the molecules themselves are tabular perpendicular to the axis, as in
the case just referred to, and that they are thus readily coerced by the
pressure of the flat cover-glass to take up positions parallel to it.
Two further reproductions of photographs, taken in polarised light, of a
somewhat remarkable character, which have been placed at the author’s
disposal by the courtesy of Prof. Lehmann, are given in Figs. 113 and
114, Plate XXIII. Fig. 113 represents numerous doubly refractive and
dichroic strips marking the boundaries of elongated individual crystals
of the substance dibenzal benzidine, and affords a graphic idea of the
real character of the double refraction displayed by liquid crystals.
[Illustration:
_PLATE XXIII._
FIG. 113.—Elongated Liquid Crystals of Dibenzal Benzidine, showing
Double Refraction and Dichroism.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 114.—Spherical Liquid Crystals of Para-azoxy-anisol, showing
Interference Colours under Crossed Nicols as the Effect of
Compression.
]
Fig. 114 represents the effect of compression on para-azoxy-anisol, and
demonstrates very clearly the distribution of the interference colours
due to double refraction.
We are thus face to face in these remarkable experiments with some new
facts concerning the nature of crystals. For we pass here into the
borderland between ordinary liquids—singly refractive and structureless,
in which the molecules are rolling over each other with every possible
orientation—and solid true crystals possessing homogeneous structure,
and the basis of which is a space-lattice arrangement of the chemical
molecules, determinative of the system of symmetry displayed. In this
wonderful borderland we certainly have had revealed to us, by the genius
and persistency of Lehmann, liquids which possess many of the attributes
of crystals, such as definite orientation of the ultimate particles,
double refraction, and optic axes. These are undoubtedly solid facts
which require to be faced.
Whether Lehmann’s theory is to be accepted in full can only be decided
after much more investigation by several independent investigators. We
are now becoming familiar with the phenomena, as they have naturally
excited immense interest in all scientific circles, and demonstrations
of many of the experiments of Lehmann have been given in this country by
Dr. Miers, Prof. Pope, and others, and particularly by Messrs Zeiss,
with their new high temperature microscope, a description of the use of
which for the projection of liquid crystals on the screen will presently
be given. Prof. Lehmann himself has described the phenomena so clearly
and fully that it is quite easy for others to repeat his experiments,
and doubtless time would often be much better spent in doing so than in
criticising points of theory without observing the phenomena at first
hand. It frequently happens, in the inevitable march of scientific
progress, that striking new facts, such for instance as the discovery of
the composite nature of the chemical atom, are apt to cause either
alarm, even panic, as to cherished theories, or else unreasoning
scepticism. The happy mean between these two modes of receiving such
facts, the open philosophic mind, ever ready to widen the scope of the
horizon when a novel supposition is indubitably proved to be a real
fact, and to assimilate that truth into the theory, widening
correspondingly the scope of the latter if needful, is obviously the
ideal thing to cultivate, and one which eventually finds itself in
harmony with the authenticated final results of the new discoveries. It
usually happens that too sweeping conclusions are at first drawn from
such new facts, but time, with its further wealth of experience,
especially the accumulation of experimental _data_ which it brings in
its train, soon levels these down and relegates the facts to their
proper positions in the great scheme of natural knowledge.
Lehmann’s view is that the ordinary effect of surface tension to cause
truly liquid particles to assume the spherical “drop” form is resisted
by a special force, which he terms “Gestaltungskraft,” and which we may
perhaps translate “Configuration-determining force.” This force he
considers is not identical with that of elasticity, but is that force by
virtue of which a “flowing crystal” continually seeks, while freely
swimming in the mother liquor or fused liquid, to take up its normal
configuration. Even if a spherical drop could be cut out of it, the
sphere would at once become a rod, prism, or pyramid or whatever the
normal configuration of the flowing crystals of the substance in
question might be.
The much debated term “liquid crystal” has been given by Lehmann to the
normal configuration of each of the now considerable number of
substances which have been discovered to exhibit the phenomena of
flowing crystals. The latter appellation “flowing crystal,” which
Lehmann also uses, appears to the author to be in many ways more
suitable, however, and would avoid much of the criticism which has been
levelled at the term “liquid crystal.”
As already indicated, Lehmann attributes the whole phenomena to a
fundamental cause, namely, anisotropy (optical dissimilarity in
different directions) of the molecules themselves, which he considers
must cause self-restoration of the structure after disturbance, a
process which he terms “spontaneous homœotropy.” He considers that it is
the molecular configuration-producing force, connected with the tabular
form of, and directionally differentiated distribution of energy and
force in, the single chemical molecules, which maintains the inner
structure of the flowing crystal in position. The polyhedral outward
form thus appears to be a necessary consequence of the inner structure,
on this basis that it is a force resident in the molecules themselves
which produces the structure.
Now the revelation of new facts, as startling as those which are now
experimentally fully confirmed concerning flowing crystals, must
inevitably cause searching reflection as to whether the magnificent
geometrical work on the 230 homogeneous structures, and their
development in actual fact in the 32 classes of crystals, is to stand or
to be seriously affected. Again the author ventures to express the
opinion, that just what happened in regard to the historic differences
between the schools of Haüy and Mitscherlich, will in all probability
again occur, namely, both extreme views will be shown to depend more or
less on real facts, and other connecting facts will eventually be
revealed which will completely reconcile the two series with each other.
In the author’s opinion, the geometrical work will stand, as the grand
generalisation it really is. But it will be interpreted in the future
without the somewhat arbitrary assumptions which have more or less
accompanied it. From these it will be freed, and then rise purified and
elevated to its real dominating position in regard to crystal
morphology.
Lehmann, with the natural enthusiasm of the discoverer of one of the
most remarkable facts for which the last few decades have been famous,
may have carried his theory too far, and particularly in that part of
his work, to which the author has not hitherto referred, in which he
describes certain phenomena of flowing crystals as akin to the movement
of living organisms such as bacteria, and thus brought even some of the
sound facts under the criticism of the sceptic more than might otherwise
have been the case. He may also have made his theory far more
revolutionary than is essential. But the one incontrovertible thing
stands out plainly, namely, that the “flowing crystals” with which he
has made us acquainted are an indubitable experimental fact. Flowing
crystals are produced, however, by a relatively few substances of very
complex molecular constitution, involving a large number of atoms in the
molecule; they are mostly compounds of carbon, and in number possibly
not one per cent. of the innumerable substances known to produce
ordinary solid crystals. That the theory of crystal structure can
eventually be made to include these few remarkable substances is highly
probable, when many more facts have been accumulated.
Lehmann would appear to have made one point very clear, which at once
removes an objection long felt by the author to the theory of crystal
structure as it stands at present, namely, that the chemical molecule is
endowed with a directive orientative force, which is certainly concerned
in crystallisation. To assume, as has been done, just because it is not
necessary from the point of view of the geometrician in developing his
possible homogeneous structures, that no directive force is operative in
crystallisation, and that all is a mere question of the most convenient
mechanical packing of the molecules, is, in the author’s opinion, going
beyond what the experimental facts justify. If Lehmann’s discovery of
flowing crystals does nothing more than return to the molecule the
property always hitherto attributed to it, of possessing in itself some
directive force by reason of which it arranges itself homogeneously by
mutual accommodation with its similarly endowed fellow molecules, when
its motion in the liquid state has been sufficiently arrested by its
approach to its fellows within the range of molecular action (four or
five molecular diameters), either by cooling or the falling out of
previously separating solvent molecules, it will have achieved a notable
thing.
What does occur at the moment of crystallisation is at the present time
one of the most interesting unsolved questions in crystallography, and
one calling most urgently for solution. Attention was directed to the
problem in the last chapter, in connection with the suggestive work of
Miers on vicinal faces. It was shown that it was only when the directive
force had time to come properly into operation that the primary faces of
fundamental importance were produced, and that when the crystallisation
was rapid vicinal faces formed instead. Lehmann believes that a single
kind of chemical molecule is only capable of producing a single specific
space-lattice, and that polymorphism is due to alteration of the
molecules themselves at the critical temperature of transformation. He
showed so far back as 1872 that this limit could be actually observed
under the microscope, as a definite line of demarcation between the two
varieties as the temperature fell, one side of the field attaining the
critical temperature slightly before the other, and the defining line
between the two kinds thus travelling over the field. Internal friction
did not appear to Lehmann to enter into the question at all, as he
considered it would have done if a rearrangement of the molecules were
the sole cause of the change. The molecules themselves, he states, must
have been undergoing change, and such rearrangement of them as occurred
must have been due to that fact.
[Illustration:
_PLATE XXIV._
FIG. 117.—Arrangement of Astatic Magnet-systems in a Plane.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 118.—Arrangement of Astatic Magnet-systems in Space.
]
Lehmann suggests a very interesting explanation of the molecular
orientative force of configuration, namely, that it is due to the action
of the electronic corpuscles (forming the elementary atoms) rotating in
the molecule. For the molecules of flowing crystals behave like freely
suspended astatic systems of magnets, which are constantly setting
themselves, even while moving about, in a crystalline space-lattice. He
suggests that the molecules are really magnets the poles of which
mutually attract and repel one another; that two equal magnetic
molecules are arranged alongside with opposite poles against each other,
thus mutually binding each other, or that four horse-shoe magnets may be
arranged with opposite poles together, in a tetragonal astatic system,
as shown in Fig. 115, Plate XXII. The latter may be grouped in space in
a cubic astatic system, as represented in Fig. 116 on the same Plate;
while Figs. 117 and 118, Plate XXIV., are further suggestive of how a
homogeneous structure of such astatically distributed molecules can be
built up, Fig. 117 representing a single plane of them, and Fig. 118 the
complete arrangement in space.
An astatic system of molecules of this nature would have lost all power
of attraction by a magnet, and the fact would thus be accounted for that
no striking crystallographic results have ever attended experiments on
crystallisation in a magnetic field. Astatic systems, however, such as
that shown in Fig. 115, would certainly arrange themselves in
space-lattices. For such parallel arrangements would, in general,
involve differences in different directions, with regard both to
internal friction and to the power of thermal expansion and of such
regular dilatational or other deformational changes as we know are
provoked by different physical conditions of environment. These
differences would naturally, in turn, give rise to external polyhedral
form.
Lehmann then goes on to point out that either electric currents or
mechanically moved quantities of electricity, such as moving negative
electronic corpuscles, can give rise to just such magnetic effects, and
he suggests that these corpuscles are the true cause. He supposes that
the directive forces result in astatic combinations which find their
equilibrium when the latter have taken up their positions at the eight
corners of a cube or other elementary parallelepipedon of one of the
fourteen possible space-lattices, the positive atoms being encircled
spiral-wise by the negative electronic corpuscles in alternately
opposite directions. Such parallelepipeda would seek homogeneous
repetition by virtue of the fact of the corners exhibiting alternating
polarity.
These theoretical ideas of Lehmann have naturally called forth much
discussion, criticism, and scepticism. But, so far, his experimental
facts have been fully substantiated by further investigation. Much more
practical work is urgently required, however, before the subject can be
considered as laid on a secure foundation. So much may be said, however,
that it is clear that we must concede the existence of a directive force
of crystallisation, and not be led by the pure geometry of the subject
of crystal structure to ignore facts of such interest and undoubted
importance as have been brought into prominence by the remarkable work
of Lehmann.
A further interesting contribution has recently been made by
Vorländer[27] to the facts regarding the relationship between chemical
constitution and the formation of liquid crystals. It must have already
struck the reader that most of the substances which exhibit liquid
crystals are composed of a large number of chemical atoms, being either
long-chain compounds of the fatty acids or complex derivatives of the
hydrocarbon benzene, C_{6}H_{6}; also that many of the latter are “para”
compounds, that is, derivatives in which the substitution groups are
inserted in the benzene ring of six carbon atoms in the “para” position,
which is that at the opposite corner of the hexagon to the carbon atom
to which a substitution group has already been attached. This renders
the para compounds the most extended in a straight line of all the
benzene derivatives. Now Vorländer finds that a particularly favourable
condition for the production of liquid crystals is a linear structure of
the molecule. As the para substitution products of benzene derivatives
possess this elongated structure, many of them exhibit the development
of liquid crystals. The more linearly extended the structure becomes,
that is, the longer the straight chain of atoms is, the more favourable
become the conditions. The advent of a third substitution group,
however, which would have the effect of producing a kink in the chain,
or of bending it, appears to destroy the possibility of the production
of liquid crystals. This interesting observation may afford the key to
many of the extraordinary phenomena of liquid crystals which have been
described, and is undoubtedly one of prime importance. Further
favourable conditions for the formation of liquid crystals, according to
Vorländer,[28] are the aromatic character, and the presence of the
doubly-linked carbon and nitrogen groups C:C, C:N, and N:N, which are
usually so rich in energy.
The idea of the formation of a specific crystalline homogeneous
structure, merely because the mechanical fitting-in of the molecules
occurs with the minimum of trouble or maximum of ease for this
particular type of all the 230 possible types, is certainly not
applicable to the case of Lehmann’s liquid crystals. With this,
moreover, is also connected the question of softness or hardness of
crystals, which was referred to at the opening of this chapter. For the
so-called liquid crystals are extreme cases of softness, and yet in
these cases the molecules must still be arranged in accordance with the
internal structure of a crystal, either parallel or enantiomorphously
definitely orientated with respect to each other, for otherwise it is
not possible to account for the optical properties resembling the
orientated ones of a crystal. Yet the condition being that of a liquid,
the molecules must be able readily to pass and roll over each other, and
hence cannot be at the close quarters where mere “fitting-in” comes into
play.
Again, as has been pointed out earlier, many soft crystals, even such as
calcite, which are only relatively soft, attaining the position of as
much as four in the scale of hardness, readily exhibit the property of
being deformable upon glide-planes. The molecules in these cases have
been shown to undergo a movement which has two components, a
transference and a rotation, a fact which has been thoroughly
substantiated by optical investigations of the parts of the crystal
concerned before and after gliding. There cannot, therefore, have been
merely “fitting-in” of the molecules, but their orientated positions
must have been determined and maintained by the organising force, which
is probably purely physical and not chemical, but is nevertheless the
cause of crystallisation; it draws the molecules within a certain range
of each other, corresponding to and dependent upon the temperature,
causes or enables them to arrange themselves in the marshalled order of
the particular type among the 230 possible arrangements, and keeps them
at the same time from approaching nearer to each other than within these
prescribed limits corresponding to the temperature. It is doubtless
within these limits that gliding can occur parallel to such planes as
leave the molecules most room for the purpose, and which are directions
of least resistance.
[Illustration:
FIG. 119.—Lehmann’s Crystallisation Microscope arranged for
Projection.
]
Connected with this important question is the principle enunciated by
Bravais, as a result of his discovery of the space-lattice, that
cleavage occurs most readily parallel to those net-planes of the
space-lattice which are most densely strewn with points. The force just
referred to, whether we term it cohesion or otherwise, is obviously at a
maximum within such a plane, and at a minimum in the perpendicular
direction where the points are further off from each other. Moreover, it
has been fairly well proved also, from the experiments of Wulff,
described in the last chapter, that the direction or directions of
maximum cohesion are those of slowest growth of the crystal; so that
faces parallel to those directions become relatively more extended owing
to the more rapid growth of other faces on their boundaries, and thus
become the most largely developed and confer the “habit” on the crystal.
All these are facts so important as evidences of a controlling force at
work in crystallisation, that a _purely_ geometrical theory of the
formation of crystals which would make “facility of fitting-in” of the
molecular particles its chief tenet, obviously does not tell us the
complete story. Hence the author desires to utter a warning against
going too far with the pure geometry of the subject. The geometricians
have done a grand work in providing us with the thoroughly well
established 230 types of homogeneous structures, as a full and final
explanation of the 32 classes of crystals, and so far their results are
wholly and unreservedly acceptable.
The phenomena of “liquid crystals” lend themselves admirably to screen
demonstration, for which purpose an excellent improved form of the
crystallisation microscope of Lehmann, shown in Fig. 119, is constructed
by Zeiss, and its actual use in the projection, with the aid of the
well-known Zeiss electric lantern, but specially fitted for the purpose,
is shown in Fig. 120.
A magnification of 600–700 diameters on the screen is very suitable,
employing a Zeiss 8–millimetre objective without eyepiece. This
objective affords directly a magnification of 30 diameters. For ordinary
eye observation an eyepiece magnifying 6–8 times is added, thus
affording to the eye a magnification of about 200 diameters.
[Illustration:
FIG. 120.—Zeiss Apparatus for the Projection of Liquid Crystals.
]
The lantern is supplied with a self-feeding electric arc lamp, ensuring
a steady light. A collective lens of extra light-gathering power is
fitted in front as condenser, and from it proceeds a light-tight tube
provided with a water cell to filter out most of the heat rays which
accompany the light. The electric lantern with Brockie-Pell or Oliver
self-feeding arc lamp, shown in Figs. 71 and 79 (pages 186 and 202), is
also equally suitable, and with the water cell, and parallelising
concave lens removed from the large Nicol polariser, affords a parallel
beam of the same character as the Zeiss apparatus. The microscope stands
on a sole plate provided with levelling screws, and is naturally
employed in the vertical position for such work with fused substances. A
mirror inclined at 45° at the foot of the microscope directs the
parallelised rays from the optical lantern through the microscope, and
another above the optical tube reflects them to the screen.
The heating apparatus consists of a form of miniature Bunsen burner
fitted with blowpipe blast, the respective pressures of gas and air
being regulated by means of two taps with graduated arcs for obtaining
greater delicacy of adjustment. The tabular plate seen to the left in
Fig. 119 is the graduated semi-circle of the two taps; below it is seen
the cylindrical mixing chamber for gas and air, in the event of the
necessity for using the Bunsen as a blowpipe. There are two separate
attachments for indiarubber tubes to this cylinder, conveying
respectively gas and air. Above the object stage a double air-blast is
fitted, each tube of which is hinged with a universal joint, so that it
can be readily adjusted to any desired position on either side of and
above the glass plate (supported on little metallic uprights) on which
the experiment is being conducted. A polarising Nicol prism and an
analysing Nicol, both constructed in a manner which protects them from
the effects of heat more effectually than is the case with the usual
form, are provided for obtaining the projections in polarised light. The
objective and analysing Nicol, as well as the substage condenser, are
also specially protected from injury by heat, by being surrounded with a
water jacket, supplied with running water, and a disc-like screen just
above the objective assists in deflecting the heat rays from the optical
tube and its Bertrand lens and other usual fittings. The miniature
Bunsen flame is usually brought about an inch below the object-plate,
and the size of the flame can be regulated with the utmost precision, so
that a fairly constant temperature can be obtained for a considerable
time. With the aid of the blowpipe air-blast temperatures up to 700° C.
can be safely employed.
The microscope shown in position on the projection apparatus in Fig. 120
is a still more recent form introduced by Zeiss, embodying several
further conveniences and improvements.
The following substances lend themselves particularly well to projection
purposes. Para-azoxy-anisol with resin, which exhibits the phenomenon of
rotating drops; cholesteryl acetate, which affords a fine example of
spherical liquid crystals; paraazoxy-phenetol with resin, which gives
beautiful interference colours; and the acetyl ester of
para-azoxy-benzoic acid with resin, which shows the uniting of crystals
to form larger and larger individuals.
Perhaps the most interesting and beautiful of all is cholesteryl
acetate, a characteristic field of which is shown in Fig. 121 on Plate
XVI., facing page 208. It is interesting that on this Plate XVI. there
are represented the very hardest and the softest of crystals, namely,
diamonds and liquid crystals. In order to obtain the finest effect the
heating and cooling should be carried out very slowly. The little Bunsen
burner, with a very minute flame, is first placed under the slide, and
allowed to act until the substance melts and forms a clear liquid. The
gas jet is then removed and the air-blasts, both of which are
simultaneously actuated when the tap controlling them is turned, are
very gently brought into operation, one on each side of the centre of
the slide, there being a good working distance of a quarter of an inch
or more between the slide and the objective. The cooling is thus brought
about very slowly. The Nicols should be crossed, and at this time the
field is quite dark, the liquid substance being at this temperature
(well above 114.5° the ordinary melting point) an ordinary singly
refractive liquid.
As soon as the temperature has become reduced to that at which the
particular modification of cholesteryl acetate is produced which forms
liquid crystals, spots of light make their appearance at various points
in the field, and each expands into a beautiful circular and more or
less coloured disc marked by a rectangular sectorial black cross, which
latter is well shown in the illustration (Fig. 121). These beautiful
apparitions continue to occur, and each to expand to a certain size,
which is rarely exceeded, until the whole field becomes filled with the
wheels or crossed discs, the general effect very much in some respects
resembling that afforded by a slide of the well-known polarising
substance salicine. These discs, however, are liquid, being spherical
drops, of the structure already described and illustrated in Fig. 103,
and that this is so is at once made apparent on touching the cover-glass
with a pen-knife or other hard pointed substance, which immediately
causes them to become distorted. They recover instantly their shape
again when the pressure is removed. When the cooling, moreover, has
proceeded still further, there is a sudden change, and acicular solid
crystals shoot over the screen, tinted with all the colours of the
spectrum, until the field is full of them, the ordinary solid
modification of the substance having then been produced. The experiment
may be repeated with the same specimen of the substance, mounted on the
same slide, covered with the usual thin cover-glass, time after time for
months, at reasonable intervals.
In concluding this chapter it may be mentioned that absolute proof of
the double refraction of the liquid crystals of several different
substances, derivatives of cinnamic acid, has been afforded during the
year 1910. For direct measurements have been carried out by two
independent investigators, Dorn and Stumpf, of the two refractive
indices corresponding to the ordinary and extraordinary rays in each
case, the crystals being uniaxial.
CHAPTER XVII
THE CHEMICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CRYSTALLOGRAPHY. THE THEORY OF POPE AND
BARLOW—CONCLUSION.
Nothing in connection with the subject of crystallography is more
surprising than the neglect and apathy with which it has been for long
treated by the chemical world. That crystalline structure is intimately
related to chemical constitution will have been made abundantly plain
during the course of this book. Yet in spite of the great work of
Mitscherlich, essentially a chemist, and of a large amount of striking
work which has been steadily accumulating during the last thirty years,
with results of vital importance to chemistry, it is only at the
eleventh hour that chemists are really awakening to the vast
significance which crystal structure has for them.
The explanation undoubtedly is, that the long interregnum of conflicting
investigations, doubt, and controversy, which followed the work of Haüy
and Mitscherlich, and preceded the beginning of really accurate and
painstaking investigation of an organised and systematic character, had
caused chemists to regard with more or less of indifference the work of
the crystallographers. Added to this we must remember that the subject
of crystallography has hitherto been taught, when taught at all, merely
as an appanage of mineralogy, although the pure chemical substances
which crystallise well infinitely outnumber the naturally occurring
minerals, and the results afforded by them frequently possess a much
greater value by reason of the purity of the substances and their more
definite chemical constitution. Also the mathematical and geometrical
side has usually been unduly emphasised, and carried on in lectures
without any practical goniometrical work at all. Moreover, the current
text-books have often proved forbiddingly full of calculations and
formulæ, and of the obsolete and unenticing symbols of Naumann.
At last we have come to see that the subject is one of fascinating
interest when its study is commenced in a practical manner from the
beginning, armed from the very first lesson with the goniometer. The
crystal itself is then our main and highly interesting study; its
exterior form unravels itself in a most delightfully simple manner when
we follow the arrangement of its faces in zones on the goniometer
itself; and its symmetry becomes immediately patent to our eyes in all
ordinary simple cases, when we construct for ourselves its plan in a
stereographic projection, drawn at first in freehand while still at the
goniometer. The calculations also become perfectly simple when we have
learnt that only the simplest of the very easy formulæ of spherical
trigonometry are required, and which a knowledge of only elementary
plane trigonometry enables us to apply. Aided by a few very helpful
rules, such as those of Napier for calculating right-angled spherical
triangles, and the rule of the anharmonic ratio of four poles in a
zone—which, when the positions of three crystal faces of the zone are
known, at once enables us to calculate the situation of any fourth face
of the zone—we have at once a stock-in-trade which carries us over all
difficulties in the way of calculation, and relegates this side of the
work to an altogether subordinate position, although accuracy in
carrying it out is, of course, absolutely essential and even vital.
Especial interest has recently been attracted on the part of chemists to
the bearing of crystallography on their science by a remarkable theory
which has been advanced by Pope and Barlow, connecting the internal
structure of crystals with chemical valency, the power which the atom of
a chemical element possesses of combining with the atoms of other
elements, and which is generally expressed by the number of atoms of a
monad element, such as hydrogen or chlorine, with which it is capable of
combining chemically. Thus the electro-positive metal potassium is said
to have monad valency because it is capable of combining with one atom
of the electro-negative element chlorine to form the salt potassium
chloride, KCl; calcium possesses dyad valency because it can unite with
two atoms of chlorine to form calcium chloride, CaCl_{2}; aluminium is
triadic as it can combine with three atoms of chlorine producing
aluminium chloride, AlCl_{3}; carbon is a tetrad because it can take up
four chlorine atoms, forming carbon tetrachloride, CCl_{4}, and
phosphorus a pentad as it can fix five with production of phosphorus
pentachloride, PCl_{5}; while sulphur is a hexad because it can take up
as many as six atoms of chlorine, forming sulphur hexachloride, SCl_{6}.
Occasion has already been taken in Chapter XI. to refer to the able work
of Prof. Pope with regard to optically active carbon compounds, and in
Chapter IX. the important contribution of Mr Barlow to the completion of
the theory of the homogeneous partitioning of space has likewise been
discussed. In collaboration these two investigators have now propounded
a theory which connects the chemical and geometrical sides of
crystallography in a somewhat startling manner, which has naturally
aroused very considerable discussion, and which, whether right or wrong,
cannot fail to have the best results in attracting investigators to the
subject.
Starting from the facts which have now been laid down in this book as
having been firmly established by the most careful measurement and
experimental investigation—notably the constancy of the interfacial
angles of the crystals of the same substance, the fixed positions of the
atoms or their spheres of influence in the molecule and in the crystal,
and the arrangement of the molecules in space-lattices and the atoms in
point-systems—Pope and Barlow assume that valency, the expression of the
relative combining power of the chemical elements, is a question of the
size of the sphere of influence of the atom of an element, and that the
relative sizes of such spheres of influence determine the modes in which
they can be packed, that is, the nature of the homogeneous crystal
structure which they can build up. The theory consequently renders the
chemical phenomenon of valency and the physical phenomenon of
crystalline form mutually interdependent.
It will thus be apparent that the essence of their conception is that
the chemical molecule may be considered as made up of a number of
spheres corresponding to, and representing, the spheres of influence of
the atoms composing it, and that the volume of each sphere is roughly
proportional to the valency of the atom which it represents. They then
assume that the sum of the valencies of the atoms present in the
molecule may be substituted for the molecular volume, and the quantity
thus arrived at is termed by them the “valency volume.” By using the
valency volume instead of the molecular volume in the author’s formulæ
for calculating the molecular distance ratios, which have been shown in
Chapter X. to afford the relative dimensions of the unit cell of the
space-lattice, and the distances of separation of the centres of gravity
of the molecules from each other along the directions of the crystal
axes, Pope and Barlow arrive at new ratios, which they term equivalence
parameters. By the use of these latter they have attempted to account
for the crystalline structure of a number of substances—chiefly organic
compounds, in the investigation of which Prof. Pope has proved so
adept—which are connected morphotropically in the manner described in
Chapter VIII., and of others which are still less intimately connected.
Unfortunately, the equivalence parameters do not make clear the
relationships in an isomorphous series, as do the molecular distance
ratios; for they are, from their very nature and mode of derivation,
almost identical for all the members of an isomorphous series, the
valencies of the interchangeable elements being the same. The molecular
distance ratios have also the great advantage of being derived from the
three measurements which have now been brought to the highest pitch of
experimental accuracy, namely, atomic weight determinations, density
determinations by the Retgers immersion method, and goniometrical and
physical measurements (optical and thermal) with instruments now
available of the utmost refinement. Structural constants thus derived
are obviously of especial value. It would thus appear that the theory
requires modification so as to take account of the experimentally proved
regular increase in volume and in the directional dimensions of the
structural unit cell of the crystal space-lattice, when one element of
the same family group and of the same valency is interchanged for
another. Indeed, as the theory stands at present it entirely ignores and
fails to offer any explanation of the highly important physical property
of density, specific gravity. That this physical constant, and the
equally important constant molecular volume, derived by dividing the
molecular weight by the density, possess a real and significant meaning
in isomorphous series, formed by the interchange of elements of the same
family group, has been clearly proved in Chapter X. This fact is,
indeed, so obvious that any further development of the theory must of
necessity take account of it.
A precise statement of their conception has recently been made by Prof.
Pope in an excellent Report on the Progress of Crystallography, issued
by the Chemical Society early in the year 1909. He states that they
(Pope and Barlow) “regard the whole of the volume occupied by a
crystalline structure as partitioned out into polyhedra, which lie
packed together in such a manner as to fill the whole of that volume
without interstices. The polyhedra can be so selected that each
represents the habitat of one component atom of the material, and are
termed the spheres of atomic influence of the constituent atoms. Up to
this point no assumption is made other than that clearly indicated by
the result of crystallographic measurements, namely, that each atom
present in a crystalline structure exerts a distinct morphological
effect—or, what is the same thing, appropriates a certain definite
volume. The assumption is next made that the crystalline structure,
which is resolvable into individual molecules and ultimately into
individual atoms, exists as such by reason of equilibrium set up between
opposing attractive and repulsive forces operating between the component
atoms, and that this equilibrium results in the polyhedra representing
the spheres of atomic influence assuming shapes which are as nearly as
possible spherical.... The polyhedra thus arrived at may be regarded as
derived by compression of a close-packed assemblage of deformable,
incompressible elastic spheres,[29] the compression sufficing for the
practical extinction of the interstitial space. When such an assemblage
is released from pressure it is evident that in place of polyhedra, the
shapes of which approximate as closely as possible to the spherical,
closely packed spheres are presented; the distances between the sphere
centres can be substantially in the same ratios as the distances between
the centres of the corresponding polyhedra in the unexpanded mass, and
the equilibrium condition of maximum sphericity of the polyhedra will be
presented in the expanded mass of spheres by the existence of the
maximum number of contacts between spheres. The whole method of treating
the primary assumption thus resolves itself into finding close-packed
assemblages of spheres of various sizes representing by their relative
volumes the spheres of influence of the component atoms of any
particular crystalline structure.”
Some very interesting evidence of the validity of their fundamental
assumption of spheres of influence of the component atoms as the
ultimate structural units is brought forward. They show that there are
two modes of closely packing equal spheres, which give rise respectively
to a cubic and a hexagonal crystal structure, the latter having a
specific axial ratio of the vertical to the three equal equatorial
horizontal axes; and that the chemical elements which are solids and
crystallise, and the structural units of which can naturally be assumed
to be equal spheres, being those of the similar atoms of the same
chemical element, do practically all crystallise either in the cubic
system or in the hexagonal system with the specific axial ratio
indicated by them. The theory as it concerns chemical valency is
obviously not affected by these interesting facts, as the spheres of
influence present are those of the identically similar atoms of the same
element. But the theory has received considerable support from the
results of the investigation of a number of carbon compounds, chiefly
derivatives of benzene.
Thus, in spite of the very wise decision of Barlow at the time of
developing his theory of the homogeneous partitioning of space, to keep
quite clear of attributing shape to the structural unit atoms or
molecules, and to consider them as points, he, in common with the other
contributors to that splendid geometrical work, appears driven to
consider the question of shape when, in collaboration with his chemical
colleague, he endeavours to apply his geometrical results to the
practical problems of chemistry. It may be inevitable that we cannot get
away from the idea of shape of the fundamental structural units. Yet the
moment we do admit the idea, and begin to talk of polyhedra, or even of
spheres, in close or any other packing, we enter the debatable land,
concerning which the experimental evidence is as yet but shadowy and
liable to many interpretations. Hence it is that we have the
parallelohedra of Von Fedorow, having volumes proportional to the
molecular volumes, the more general plane-faced cell of fourteen faces,
the tetrakaidecahedron of Lord Kelvin and its deformed derivatives, and
now the polyhedra of Pope and Barlow. The more indefinite
“Fundamentalbereich” of Schönflies appears to be left behind, and we
have embarked on a definite course of attributing shape to the component
atoms or their regions of influence in the crystal structure. Von
Fedorow has developed his particular theory in a very masterly manner,
and with the aid of it professes, and with very considerable success in
many cases, to determine the correct mode of setting up a crystal for
truly comparative descriptive purposes, and has derived therefrom a
remarkable method of crystallochemical analysis.
Moreover, there is yet another view, that of Sollas,[30] that the
packing of the molecules is a more open one altogether, a view to which
he has been guided by consideration of the molecular volume. Sollas has
offered some remarkable explanations of crystal structure, notably in
the case of the dimorphous forms of silver iodide. The abnormal
contraction which occurs on heating this interesting substance, and its
sudden transformation at 146° from the ordinary hexagonal into a cubic
modification as discovered by Lehmann, appear capable of very clear
explanation on the basis of his theory. According to this theory of
Sollas the volumes of the spheres of influence of the atoms of the
different elements of the same family group, such as those of the group
of alkali metals or those of the halogens, chlorine, bromine, and
iodine, vary progressively in a manner which is dependent on the atomic
volumes of the elements, which have a real comparative significance when
the elements belong to the same family group.
It is probable that there is a considerable substratum of truth behind
these various apparently conflicting views, and what is now required is
that the germ of real fact shall be winnowed from the husk of fallacious
speculation, just as occurred in the happy recent settlement of the old
issue between Haüy and Mitscherlich. As in that case, moreover, it will
be experimental work of superlative accuracy which can alone offer the
desirable evidence on which a satisfactory arbitration can be founded.
It is thus obvious that we have now arrived at a stage in the history of
crystallography when more experimental data, and many more measurements
of the most carefully conducted character, on pure materials and
excellently developed crystals, are most urgently needed, in order to
decide these important, indeed fundamental, questions, the present state
of which the author has endeavoured to present with judicial
impartiality. When one looks around, and sees the almost complete lack
of opportunities for the training of investigators in this rapidly
growing branch of science, the importance of which to chemistry and
physics is increasing every day, while the field is ripe for the
harvesters, one is inclined to feel depressed with the thought of the
opportunities which are being lost. Our country has, in this science at
any rate, a fine record, having with few breaks led the van of progress
from the time of Wollaston, the inventor in the year 1809 of the
reflecting goniometer, and of Miller, the originator of our method of
describing crystals and the pioneer of accurate experimental work, down
to the present day. It may be, also, that our country’s reputation is
safe at this moment. But it is in the hands of a band of investigators
so small, and often of the private and not professional nature, carrying
on the work for sheer love of it and deep interest in it, that the
wonder is that so much has been done, and it is the provision for
carrying on our national tradition of leadership in crystallography in
the future that is a matter for the deepest concern.
If the perusal of this book should have awakened sufficient interest in
the minds of some of its readers to prompt them to offer themselves as
recruits to this small band of investigators, and especially if it
should have inspired the zeal and enthusiasm of a few young students
looking around for a promising and fascinating field of work, and,
finally, if it should prove to be of assistance in obtaining the means
of training such recruits with the help of the best and most accurate
experimental apparatus which can be obtained, the author’s main objects
in writing it will have been attained.
INDEX
Airy’s spirals, 197
Alpine snow-field, 49
Alum, ammonium iron, 43;
cæsium, 42;
potash, 5, 16, 17, 77;
vicinal faces of potash, 248, 251
Amethyst quartz, 222–229;
as example of pseudo-racemism, 231, 232
Ammonium chloride labile crystallisation, 248;
iron alum, 43;
NH_{4} group, and its isomorphism with alkalies, 82, 83, 131;
oleate, liquid crystals of, 259–263;
oleate, twins of, 262
Ampère’s researches on ammonia, 83
Anatase, crystal of, 37
Antimony oxide, dimorphism of, 87, 88
Apatite, crystal of, 37
Aragonite, biaxial interference figure of, 189, 190
Armstrong and Pope on sobrerol, 153
Arsenic oxide, crystals of, 5, 88
Astatic systems of molecular magnets of Lehmann, 271, 272
Asymmetric carbon atom, 144, 145
Axes and axial planes of crystals, 51, 55, 56
Axial ratios, 129
Babinet’s double-wedge quartz plate, 219
Bacteria, destruction of one enantiomorphous form by, 149
Barium nitrate, 152
Barker, researches on perchlorates, 123
Barlow, discovery of remainder of 230 point-systems, 118, 119, 140;
and Pope’s theory, 285–292
Bartolinus, Erasmus, 17
Benzoic acid, screen experiment on crystallisation of, 229–231
Bergmann and Gahn’s laws of cleavage, 18
Berzelius and Mitscherlich, atomic weights and isomorphism, 80, 82, 83,
85
Beudant’s researches on the vitriols, 75, 76
Biaxial crystals, 60°-prisms and refractive indices of, 162, 163, 184;
optic axes of, 185;
optic axial angle of, 191
Biot’s researches on tartaric and racemic acids, 143
Biquartze, natural and artificial, 181, 211, 214, 216, 217
Black band of quartz twins, 216–218
Boisbaudran, Lecoq de, 238
Boyle, Robert, 17
Brauns, 254
Bravais, 114;
space-lattices, 114
Brookite, 91
Cæsalpinus, 15
Cæsium alum, 42
Calcite, crystals of, 10–13, 38;
amount of double refraction of, 174;
in rock sections, 177, 178;
uniaxial interference figure of, 189, 190;
plate perpendicular to axis of, 209;
refractive indices of, 174;
60°-prism of, 165, 168
Calcium carbonate, three habits of crystals of, 11
Calcium dextro-glycerate, optical activity and crystal form of, 155–160
Carangeot’s contact goniometer, 18–20
Carbonate, calcium, 11, 87;
potassium sodium, 44
Carbonates of alkaline earths, 74
Carbon, dimorphism of, 137
Carbon dioxide, liquid in quartz cavities, 46
Cavendish, 23
Chemical significance of crystallography, 73, 283, 284;
valency and crystalline form, 285–291
Cholesteryl benzoate, liquid crystals of, 258;
acetate, spherical liquid crystals of, 281, 282
Chromate, potassium, 84
Chromates and manganates, isomorphism with sulphates, 84
Classes, the 32 crystal, 6, 33
Cleavage, 17;
and glide-planes, 275, 276
Cobalt sulphate, 78
Conditions for growth of crystals, 240, 244, 245
Constancy of crystal angles, 6, 13, 14, 17, 23, 132
Convergent light experiments, 186, 188
Copper sulphate, 40, 76, 78
Coppet, de, 238
Crookes, Sir William, 138, 208
Crossed-axial-plane dispersion of optic axes, 89, 94, 95;
of ethyl triphenyl pyrrholone, 106, 107, 108;
of gypsum, 89
Crystal, definition of, 4;
germs and their influence on crystallisation, 236, 237
Crystals, modes of formation of, 4, 5
Cube and its perfection of symmetry, 38;
axes of, 52
Cubic system, 37
Cyanide, potassium cadmium, crystals of, 42
Dalton, 25
Dark field of polariscope, 188, 202
Davy, Sir Humphry, researches on ammonia, 82, 83
Delafosse and morphotropy, 101
Deville and Troost’s researches on tantalum chloride, 84, 85
Diamond, 8, 137, 138, 207, 208
Dibenzal benzidine, liquid crystals of, 264
Digonal axis of symmetry, 36
Dimensions of structural parallelepipeda, 129
Dimorphism, 79, 87;
of antimony oxide, 87, 88;
of carbonate of lime, 79, 87;
of mercuric iodide, 97;
of sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 80, 81;
of sulphur, 86;
of vitriols, 79
Directive molecular force in crystallisation, 139, 269, 274–277
Dog-tooth spar, 10–12
Double refraction, interference colours due to, 176, 177;
measure of, 169, 170;
of biaxial crystals, 184;
of uniaxial crystals, 183
Double sulphates and selenates, 35, 79, 121, 127, 128, 132
Dulong and Petit’s law, 84
Electronic corpuscles, constituents of atoms, 113, 124
Elements of a crystal, 68, 69
Enantiomorphism and optical activity, 140;
11 classes showing, 150
Epsom salts, 76, 78
Ethyl triphenyl pyrrholone, 105, 106
Eutropic series, definition of, 132
External molecular compensation, 134, 234
Extinction directions, 204, 205
Fedorow, von, discovery of remainder of 230 point-systems, 118, 119,
140;
theory of, 291, 292
Ferricyanide, potassium, 44
Ferrocyanide, potassium, 43
Ferrous sulphate, 76, 78
Fletcher, indicatrix of, 184
Fluorspar, single refraction of, 206
Form, definition of a, 11, 60, 61
Frankenheim on morphotropy, 101;
discovery of space-lattices, 114
Frankland and Frew, 155
Fuchs, von, researches on sulphates of barium, strontium, and lead, 75,
77
Fuess reflecting goniometer, 64–66
Fundamentalbereich of Schönflies, 112, 113
Gattermann, 258
Gay-Lussac on alums, 77;
on ammonia, 83;
on racemic acid, 142
Gernez, 238
Gessner, 14
Gmelin, researches on racemic acid, 142
Goniometer, contact, 19, 20;
reflecting, 64–66
Graphite, 137
Groth, von, morphotropic researches, 98, 102–104
Growth of a crystal, 1;
from solution, 237–254
Guglielmini, researches on crystal structure, 17
Gypsum (selenite), cleavage of, 203;
crystals of, 14;
extinction directions of, 204;
60°-prism, experiment with, 163, 168;
twins of in polarised light, 205, 206
Habit of crystals, 12, 13
Hardness of crystals, 255, 274
Hatchett’s discovery of columbium, 85
Haüy, 22;
and Mitscherlich, 70, 75, 77, 88, 132;
fundamental forms, 22, 23;
law of constancy of form, 23;
lattices, 29;
law of rational indices, 24, 29, 30;
modernisation of theories of, 30–32;
molécules intégrantes, soustractives, and élémentaires, 25–28;
structural units, 24
Hemihedral classes of crystals, 34
Hexagonal axes of symmetry, 36;
prism, 11;
system, 36, 53
Hexakis octahedron, 39;
indices of, 61
Hjortdahl and morphotropy, 101
Holohedral classes of crystals, 34
Homogeneity, 6, 16;
definition of, 114
Homogeneous structures, the 230 types of, 6, 111
Hooke, Robert, 16
Huyghens, 17;
discovery of laws of double refraction, 17;
investigation of calcite, 17
Ice, crystalline form of, 47
Iceland spar, discovery of, 17;
rhombohedron of, 10–12
Inactive tartaric acid, 144
Inactivity, true optical, 235
Indicatrix of Fletcher, 184
Indices of crystal faces, 11
Intercepts on crystal axes, 58
Interference colours due to double refraction, 177;
figures of biaxial and uniaxial crystals, 189–191
Internal structure of crystals, 15, 111–120
Iodide of mercury, dimorphism of, 97
Isomerism, chemical and physical, 142, 143
Isomorphism, Mitscherlich’s conferment of the term, 81;
doctrine of, 81, 82;
limitations of, 85;
recent clearer definition of, 121–132
Isotropic crystals, 206
John of Berlin’s discovery of racemic acid, 142
Kipping and Pope, definition of racemism and pseudo-racemism, 153, 154
Kopp, 100
Kundt’s powder, 149
Labile solutions, 241
Laurent and Nickle’s organic researches, 99
Lavoisier, 23
Law of rational indices, 24, 50, 57, 59
Le Bel and van t’Hoff’s explanation of optical activity, 151
Le Blanc, researches on alums, 77
Lehmann, researches on liquid crystals, 256–282
Liquid crystals, 255–282;
and polymorphism, 138, 139;
list of substances forming, 280, 281
Magnesium sulphate, 76, 78
Mallard and Le Chatelier on silver iodide, 256
Manganate, potassium, 96
Manganates, 84, 96
Manganese sulphate, 78
Marignac and isomorphism of tantalum and niobium compounds, 84;
and morphotropy, 101
Mercury iodide, dimorphism of, 97
Metastable solutions, 240
Methyl triphenyl pyrrholone, 105, 106
Mica-sectors plate for testing sign of optical rotation, 212, 213
Microscope, Lehmann’s crystallisation, 256, 257, 276–280
Miers, H. A., researches on crystallisation, 238–243;
on red silver ores, 109;
on vicinal faces, 248–254
Millerian indices, 57
Mirror-image symmetry, 118, 119, 134, 135;
illustrated by quartz, 231
Mitscherlich, experiment with gypsum, 90–94;
work of, 70–97
Mixed crystals, 77, 86
Molecular compound, racemic acid a, 150
Molecular volume and distance ratios, 129, 130
Molecule, individuality and directive force of, 139, 269
Monochromatic illuminator, 192, 193
Monoclinic system, 39;
axes and axial planes of, 53, 54
Morphotropy, 98–104
Muthmann, researches on permanganates, 123
Naphthalene tetrachloride, 99
Newton’s seven orders of spectra, 177
Nickel sulphate, 76, 78
Nicol prism, 174, 175, 187
Nitrobenzenes, von Groth’s researches on, 104
Noble, Sir Andrew, experiments on liquefaction of carbon, 138
Optical activity and mirror-image symmetry, 141;
antipodes, characters of, 152;
characters of crystals, 7
Optically active classes of crystals, 150, 151
Optic axes of biaxial crystals, 185;
axis of uniaxial crystals, 165;
axial angle, 191;
axial angle of ethyl triphenyl pyrrholone for different wave-lengths,
107, 191;
axial angle of gypsum at different temperatures, 90–94, 191
Ostwald’s predictions of crystallisation phenomena, 238, 240
Oxides of arsenic and antimony, isodimorphism of, 88
Para-azoxy-anisol, liquid crystals of, 259, 265;
-benzoic acid, 263;
-cinnamic acid, 263;
-phenetol, 258, 259
Parametral form, 56
Pasteur’s law, 155;
research on morphotropy of tartrates, 100;
research on tartaric and racemic acids, 142–150
Penfield’s diagram of spherical projection, 61, 62
_Penicillium glaucum_, destruction of dextro component of racemic acid,
148
Perchlorates and permanganates, isomorphism of, 84, 96
Pfaff, 254
Phases, different solid, 137
Phenol and resorcinol, von Groth’s researches on, 103
Phosphate, ammonium magnesium, 43;
sodium dihydrogen, dimorphism of, 80, 81
Phosphates and arsenates, isomorphism of, 73, 74
Phosphorus, dimorphism of, 138
Photomicrographs of growing crystals, mode of obtaining, 41
Pistor’s goniometer, 89
Planeness of crystal faces, 6, 7
Polarisation colours due to optical activity, 179
Polarisation, rectangular, of spectra from doubly refractive prisms,
164
Polariscope, the, 187, 188
Polymorphism, 133–137
Pope and Barlow, theory of, 285–291
Positive and negative uniaxial and biaxial crystals, 166
Potassium bichromate, metastable and labile crystallisation of, 246,
247;
manganate, 96;
nickel sulphate, 35;
selenate, 96;
sulphate, 13
Priestley, 23
Primitive form of Romé de l’Isle, 20, 27
Projection polariscope, for convergent light, 92, 186, 188, 189;
for parallel light, 201, 202
Progressive change of crystal angles in isomorphous series, 125;
of double refraction, 126;
of molecular distance ratios, 130, 131;
of position of optical ellipsoid, 128
Propyl triphenyl pyrrholone, 106, 108
Proustite, 109, 110
Pseudo-racemism, 153, 154
Pyrargyrite, 109, 110
Pyroelectrical properties of crystals, 149
Quartz, 170;
crystalline form of, 171, 172;
crystals in rock sections, polarisation colours of, 175–178;
crystals, liquid cavities in, 45;
crystals on sand grains, 2, 3;
double refraction of, 174;
interference figure in convergent polarised light, 194–196;
optical activity of, 173, 179–181, 210;
plates, preparation of for polariscope, 181;
polarisation colours of due to optical activity, 209, 210;
refractive indices of, 174;
screw point-systems of, 151;
60°-prism experiment with, 165, 168;
Steno’s research on, 16;
twinning of, 215, 216, 219–221, 225;
two varieties of as examples of mirror-image symmetry, 171
Racemate, sodium ammonium, Pasteur’s researches on, 147, 148
Racemic acid, 142–146, 233, 234
Racemic forms and racemism, 150, 153, 233
Rammelsberg and morphotropy, 101
Rational indices, 24, 50, 59, 116
Reflection of light by crystal faces, 8
Refractive index, meaning of, 167
Reinitzer, 258
Reusch’s artificial quartzes, 198, 199
Rhombic system, 39;
axes and axial planes of, 52, 54
Rhombohedron and its axes, 10, 11, 54, 55, 172
Rings and brushes, optic axial, 190, 191
Rock-salt, cube of in quartz cavity, 45;
60°-prism experiment with, 162, 168
Romé de l’Isle, 18–20;
researches on alums, 77
Roozeboom, 238
Rotation of plane of polarisation by quartz of two varieties and
different thickness, 180, 210, 211
Royal Institution experiment with diamonds, 8
Sal-ammoniac, 82, 83
Salol and betol, Miers’ researches on, 242, 243
Sand grains with quartz crystals, 3
Scalenohedron of calcite, 11
Scheele’s discovery of tartaric acid, 142
Schlippe’s salt, 45
Schönflies, discovery of remainder of 230 point-systems, 118, 119, 140
Seebeck, researches on ammonia, 82, 83
Selenates, isomorphous with sulphates, 96;
of alkalies, 121
Selenic acid, 95
Selenite, polarisation colours of films of, 203
Selenium, discovery by Berzelius, 96
Sella’s warning against hasty generalisation, 102
Senarmontite, 88
Silver iodide, 256, 292
Single refraction of cubic crystals, 162, 183
Snow crystals, 49
Sobrerol, 153
Sodium chlorate, 151;
sulphantimoniate, 45
Sohncke, regular point-systems, 117;
mirror-image molecular arrangement, 141;
two point-systems of quartz, 151
Sollas, crystal structure, theory of, 292
Solubility and supersolubility, 238–241;
curves of, 240
Solutions, optical activity of, 151;
metastable and labile, 240, 241
Space-lattices, 50, 114–116;
triclinic illustration of, 115
Specific gravity, importance of determinations of, 129
Spheres of influence of atoms, 113
Steno, 16
Stereographic projection, 34, 62, 67;
of topaz, 68;
of double sulphates, 35
Stereometric arrangement of atoms in molecule, 124, 136
Story Maskelyne, 34
Strain, polarisation colours of glass and diamond due to, 207, 208
Structural units of crystals, 24, 111–113
Sulphantimoniate of sodium, 45
Sulphate, ammonium magnesium, 44
Sulphates of alkalies, 121;
of barium, strontium and lead, 74
Sulphur, dimorphism of, 86, 87, 137;
monoclinic form of, 4, 86
Symbol of a face or form, 57
Symmetry, axes and planes of, 34, 36, 41, 55;
elements of, 34
Systems, the crystal, 6, 7, 33
Tartaric acid, 142–148;
dextro, 143, 146–148;
lævo, 144, 146–148;
pyro-electrical properties of, 149
Tartrate, hydrogen potassium, 43
Tetartohedral classes of crystals, 34
Tetragonal system, 37;
axes and planes of, 36, 52
Thallium, relation of to alkali metals, 131
Thénard and Gay-Lussac, research on ammonia, 83
Thomson, J. M., 238
Thomson, Sir J. J., discovery of composition of atoms, 112
Topaz, crystal of, 40;
stereographic projection of, 68
Transition tint, 180
Triclinic bipyramid, 56;
system, 40;
axes and planes of, 53, 54
Trigonal system, 37;
axes and planes of, 37, 53, 55
Triphenyl pyrrholone derivatives, 105–108
Triple tartrate of sodium, potassium, and ammonium, 91
Tutton, fixed positions of atoms in crystals, 122–124;
law of progression of crystal properties in isomorphous series,
121–123, 129;
nature of structural units, 134, 135;
research on calcium dextro-glycerate, 157, 160;
researches on simple and double sulphates and selenates, 121;
researches on triphenyl pyrrholones, 105–108
Uniaxial crystals, optic axis of, 165;
60°-prisms of, 164;
two refractive indices of, 166, 183
Valentinite, 88
Vanadium family group of elements, 85
Vauquelin, researches on alums, 77
Vicinal faces, 248–254
Vitriols, the, 15, 76, 78
Von Lang, 23, 34
Vorländer, 263;
nature of molecules forming liquid crystals, 273
Water, exceptional thermal dilatation of, 47
Water flowers in ice, 47
Water of crystallisation, 76, 78, 79
Wave-length of most luminous part of spectrum, 179
Werner’s fundamental form, 20
Westfeld, 18
Weyberg, 250
White of higher orders, 178
Wollaston’s reflecting goniometer, 63, 81;
work on carbonates and sulphates of barium, strontium and lead, 74,
75
Wulff, 250, 252, 253
Zinc sulphate, 76, 78
Zone of crystal faces, 63;
circle, 63
PRINTED BY
TURNBULL AND SPEARS,
EDINBURGH
-----
Footnote 1:
See page 57 for explanation of indices.
Footnote 2:
_Proc. Roy. Soc._, 1908, A, 81, 40.
Footnote 3:
_Comptes Rendus_, 1842, 15, 350, and 1845, 20, 357.
Footnote 4:
_Comptes Rendus_, 1848, 27, 611, and 1849, 29, 339.
Footnote 5:
_Jahresbericht_, 1849, 19.
Footnote 6:
_Comptes Rendus_, 1848, 26, 535.
Footnote 7:
_Journ. für Prakt. Chemie._, 1865, 94, 286.
Footnote 8:
_Mem. R. Accad. di Torino_, 2A, 17, 337, and 20, 355.
Footnote 9:
_Pogg. Ann._, 141, 31.
Footnote 10:
_Mineralogical Magazine_, 1888, 8, 37.
Footnote 11:
_Journ. Chem. Soc._, 1896, 69, 507.
Footnote 12:
_Ann. de Chim. et Phys._, 1848, 24, 28 and 38; also 1850, 28, 56;
_Comptes Rendus_, 1848, 26, 535; also 1849, 29, 297; also 1850, 31,
480; also 1853, 37, 162, and 1858, 46, 615.
Footnote 13:
_Journ. Chem. Soc._, 1891, 315.
Footnote 14:
_Ibid._, 1897, 989.
Footnote 15:
_Journ. Chem. Soc._, 1891, 59, 233.
Footnote 16:
_Ibid._, 1891, 59, 96.
Footnote 17:
_Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc._, 1895, A, 185, 913.
Footnote 18:
_Mineralogical Magazine_, 1892, 10, 123.
Footnote 19:
_Journ. Chem. Soc._, 1906, 89, 413; _Proc. Roy. Soc., A_, 1907, 79,
322.
Footnote 20:
“Lehrbuch der Allgemeinen Chemice,” vol. 2, part 2, p. 780.
Footnote 21:
_Phil. Trans._, 1903, A, 202, 459.
Footnote 22:
_Phil. Trans._, 1903, A, 202, 519.
Footnote 23:
_Zeitschr. für Kryst._, 1901, 34, 449.
Footnote 24:
_Loc. cit._, p. 531.
Footnote 25:
_Sitzungsber. d. Physik. Med. Soc._, Erlangen, 1878, 10, 59.
Footnote 26:
_Neues Jahrbuch_, 1887, 138.
Footnote 27:
_Ber. der deutsch. Chem. Ges._, 1907, 40, 1970.
Footnote 28:
_Zeitschr. f. Phys. Chemie._, 1907, 57, 357.
Footnote 29:
This apparent contradiction in terms the author takes to mean that,
whatever compression is produced by pressure on one part of the
sphere, is counterbalanced by a corresponding protuberance produced in
the part not confined under pressure, the total volume being
incompressible.
Footnote 30:
_Proc. Roy. Soc._, 1898, 63, 270, 286, and 296; 1901, 67, 493.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
1. Silently corrected obvious typographical errors and variations in
spelling.
2. Retained archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings as printed.
3. Re-indexed footnotes using numbers and collected together at the end
of the last chapter.
4. Enclosed italics font in _underscores_.
5. Denoted superscripts by a caret before a single superscript
character or a series of superscripted characters enclosed in
curly braces, e.g. M^r. or M^{ister}.
6. Denoted subscripts by an underscore before a series of subscripted
characters enclosed in curly braces, e.g. H_{2}O.