The proposition for a revision of the Constitution failed to secure the

requisite majority in the Legislative Assembly, and so was defeated. On

the 8th of July the Report of the committee to whom the petitions for a

revision were referred, was presented by M. DE TOCQUEVILLE. It is a

document of great length, drawn up with decided ability. After

discussing in detail the defects inherent in the constitution, which in

the opinion of a majority of the Committee were of sufficient moment to

render a revision desirable, the Report proceeds to examine the present

situation of the country and the perils which had been alleged to attend

the revision, should it now be attempted. These apprehended dangers

arose from the unsettled state of the franchise, and the contests of

parties, each of whom desires a revision as a means for the

accomplishment of its own ends. The majority of the Committee, while

admitting the danger attending a revision, are yet convinced that it is

exceedingly necessary. This conclusion rests mainly upon the

circumstance, adverted to in our last Record, that the functions of the

Legislative and of the Executive branches of the Government expire at

almost the same time. The intention of the Constitution in fixing the

term of the one at four and of the other at three years was to prevent

the occurrence of this, until after an interval of twelve years had

given stability to the Republic. But by the law of October, 1848, the

regular time of the election for President was anticipated, so that his

term expires a year sooner than it should have done. Besides this there

is the danger that a candidate whom the Constitution renders ineligible

may be the one upon whom the popular choice will fix. Such a violation

of the Constitution, facilitated by the method of election by direct

suffrage which it provides, would be productive of the most fatal

consequences. These dangers may be obviated by surrendering the power of

Government into the hands of a Constituent Assembly. The Report then

goes on to discuss the question of the kind and amount of revision to be

recommended. The Committee, however divided upon other points, were

unanimously of the opinion that the Legislative Assembly had no power

either to propose to the Constituent Assembly that the nation should

quit the Republic, or to impose upon it that form of Government. The

Constituent would supersede the Legislative Assembly, and must be

independent of it. The Committee were also unanimously of the opinion

that the revision, if made at all, must be made in the manner prescribed

by the Constitution. If the requisite majority of three-fourths of the

votes of the Assembly could not be secured in its favor, it must be

abandoned; and hence, "any attempt having for its object to urge the

people toward unconstitutional candidateship, from the moment that the

Constitution can not be legally revised, would not only be improper and

irregular, but culpable." The proposition which the Committee, by a vote

of 9 to 6, resolved to submit to the Assembly, and to which they asked

their consent, was: "Taking into consideration Article 111 of the

Constitution, the Assembly decides that the Constitution shall be

revised in totality." The reading of this Report was listened to with an

attention and decorum by no means characteristic of the French

Legislature. At the close, a large number of members inscribed their

names, as intending to take part in the discussion. This was done to

meet the requirements of the rule that a speaker upon one side succeeds

one upon the other. The debate upon this Report commenced on the 14th.

It was opened by an admonitory speech from the President of the

Assembly, M. DUPIN, recommending order and moderation in the discussion.

A brief sketch of the views advanced by the principal speakers will

serve better than any thing else to show the state of opinion and

feeling in France at the present moment. M. DE FALLOUX, formerly

Minister of Public Instruction, in an eloquent and impressive speech,

urged the re-establishment of the monarchical principle, as the only

means of saving the country, which was falling into decay. He said

Socialism was rapidly increasing, not merely among the very poor, but

also among the better paid class of workmen. M. CAVAIGNAC made a firm

and temperate speech against the revision, and in favor of building up a

strong republic. M. COQUEREL, the well-known Protestant pastor,

advocated a revision. He believed that Bonaparte would be elected,

whether constitutionally or not, and he preferred that it should be done

constitutionally. He defended the republican form of government, and

avowed his belief that it would ultimately become universal. M. MICHEL

(de Bourges), who has made himself known as the able counsel for the

prosecuted newspapers and proscribed Socialists, made a long and very

able speech on the democratic side of the question, and against the

revision. He spoke in terms of commendation of the "Girondists who

proclaimed the Republic, and of the Montagnards who saved it," and of

"the Convention which made the Constitution known to Europe by cannon

shots, and delivered the country from tyrants." This speech has been

printed by the party for gratuitous distribution, as an exponent of

their views. M. DE BERRYER followed in a brilliant speech in favor of

Legitimacy. He admitted the great services which the President had

rendered to the cause of order, but deprecated his re-election in spite

of the Constitution, by universal suffrage, as he would then be placed

in a position superior to the Constitution. This catastrophe was to be

averted, if at all by the action of a Constituent Assembly. He painted

in glowing colors all the excesses of which the Republic had been

guilty, and affirmed that France was not adapted for or in favor of a

republican form of government. VICTOR HUGO followed in a speech in

opposition to a revision and to monarchy, and in favor of the Republic.

He reflected in very severe terms upon the Government and upon the

majority in the Assembly. His speech was greeted with applause from the

Left and disapprobation from the Right. The debate, which had hitherto

been conducted with great decorum, now closed amid a scene of wild

disorder. On the following day, the 19th, the closing speech in the

discussion was made by ODILLON BARROT in favor of a revision, as the

only means of averting the dangers which impended. At the conclusion of

his speech, the question was demanded and carried. The whole number of

votes cast was 724; of these 446 were in favor of revision, and 278

against it. Three-fourths of the votes cast, the number required to

carry the proposition, is 543; so that it failed by 97 votes. By the

rules of the Assembly it can not be revived until after an interval of

three months. The absorbing interest of the occasion is shown by the

large vote cast. The Assembly, when full, consists of 750 members; there

are now 14 vacancies, so that only 12 members were absent. The vote

against the revision was made up of the extreme Republicans in a mass,

with a few of almost every shade of opinion; including Thiers and his

friends, Lamartine, and a considerable body of moderate Republicans, as

well as a few Legitimists.

On the 21st a charge was brought in the Assembly against M. Faucher, the

Minister of the Interior, of having unduly and unconstitutionally urged

on the petitions in favor of a revision. After a warm altercation

between the Minister and M. Baze, by whom the charge was brought, the

latter offered a resolution that "The National Assembly, while

regretting that in some localities the Government, contrary to its duty

had used its influence to excite the citizens to petition, orders the

legal petitions to be deposited in the Bureau des Reseignements." This

was carried by a majority of 13 in a very full House, the vote being 333

to 320. The Ministers regarding it as a vote of censure, tendered their

resignations, which the President refused to accept. After consultation,

they repeated the tender, but were finally persuaded to retain their

posts.

A debate on Free-trade took place in the Assembly, upon a motion by M.

DE BEAUVE for the reconstruction of the customs tariff in such a manner

as to abolish all prohibitions, and to limit the duties to be levied

within the same general bounds as those adopted in England. The author

of the proposition occupied the session of one entire day, and part of

another in developing the proposed measure. M. THIERS opposed the

proposition, in a speech of great length in which he maintained that the

principle of protection was essential to the prosperity of France. M.

FOULD, Minister of Finance, also opposed the proposition as inimical to

the security and independence of a great nation. It was rejected by a

vote of 422 to 199.

A grand fete has been given by the Municipality of Paris to the

Commissioners and others prominently concerned in the Great Exhibition.

GERMANY, ETC.

The only question of political or general interest respects the

annexation of the non-Germanic portions of the Austrian Empire to the

Germanic Confederation. Diplomatic notes protesting against the

admission were presented to the Diet from the English and French

Governments. That body replied, that the question was a purely German

one, which admitted of no foreign interference.

In Austria an imperial ordinance respecting the press has been

promulgated. If any periodical "takes a hostile direction to the throne,

the unity and integrity of the Empire, religion, morality, or the

maintenance of the public peace," the Stadtholder has the power of

suspending it for three months, after two public warnings. Suspension

for a longer period, or total prohibition can only be decreed by the

Council of Ministers. But foreign works of all kinds may be prohibited,

throughout the whole empire by the Minister of the Home Department.

In Hesse-Cassel a decree has been issued annulling the oath taken by the

officers of the army to the Constitution. An amnesty has been proclaimed

to the officers and soldiers who resisted the Government during the

_quasi_ revolution last year; but the amnesty is coupled with conditions

by which its efficacy is greatly impaired.

It is said that the Russians have lately suffered severe losses in

Circassia, though no reliable and authentic details are furnished.

SOUTHERN EUROPE.

_Italy_ presents the same aspect as herefore. The only signs of life are

reports of assassinations, petty violations of law, and still more

petty decrees on the part of the rulers. In consequence of an

assassination at Milan, which Marshal Radetzky considered to have been

committed from political motives, the whole Lombardo-Venetian kingdom

has been declared to be in a state of siege; the communes are made

responsible for similar acts, and are threatened with severe treatment

unless the assassins are delivered up. At Perugia the Austrian

commandant issued a notice that, notwithstanding the prohibition of

Government, some individuals of both sexes "are still seen wearing red

ribbons, cravats, and shoes. In order to put a stop to such practices,

it is hereby declared that three days after the promulgation of the

present notice, any person wearing any such ribbon, cravat, or shoes,

shall be brought before a court martial." Two letters by Mr. Gladstone,

the English statesman, to Lord Aberdeen, have been published--setting

forth the horrible state of the administration of justice in the Kingdom

of Naples. More than thirty thousand people are confined, he assures us,

in prison upon political charges, subject to the most brutal treatment.

Among these, are an absolute majority of the Deputies who, at the same

time with the monarch, swore to the Constitution, which he has found it

convenient to violate. The Russian Minister, Count Nesselrode, is

reported to have addressed a dispatch to the Russian envoys at Naples,

Florence, and Rome, directing them to inform those Governments that the

three Northern Powers have agreed to place at their disposal all the

forces they may be compelled to require in order to suppress

revolutionary movements.

In _Portugal_ affairs have assumed a somewhat unstable aspect; and

public confidence is greatly shaken as to the ability of the present

government to sustain itself. There have been military disturbances at

various points.

THE EAST.

In _China_ the insurrection, at the latest dates, continued in full

force.--The difficulties between the Sultan and the Pasha of _Egypt_ are

reported to be in process of adjustment.

In _India_ the new Governor-general, Lord Dalhousie, appears to be by no

means popular. He is acknowledged to be an able administrator, but is

charged with unduly favoring his countrymen and personal friends in the

distribution of official patronage. A series of hurricanes has swept

Ceylon and the eastern coasts, occasioning considerable loss of

shipping. Among the vessels lost was a new iron steamer, the Falkland,

belonging to the East India Company. The swell caused by the hurricane

strained the vessel to such a degree that her plates gradually opened

until at last she broke clean in two and sank.--A movement has been made

among the Hindoos, designed to counteract the efforts of the

missionaries. A meeting of learned pundits have decided, contrary to

immemorial usage, that a person who has lost caste by forsaking his

religion can be reinstated in his privileges by the performance of

certain penitential rites.

The _Grand Canary_ Island is undergoing a dreadful visitation of the

cholera. It broke out at the end of May. On the 10th of June, and

subsequent days, the deaths reached to 100 a day. At that date out of a

population of 16,000 all but 4000 had fled from the chief town. It

became almost impossible to bury the dead. It could be done only by the

soldiers seizing upon all they could find, and compelling them to

perform that office. By the 18th of June out of 4000 inhabitants who

remained in the city, 1000 had died. In the smaller towns and

country-houses throughout the island, the disease raged with equal

violence.

Literary Notices

_Episodes of Insect Life._ A second volume of this fascinating chronicle

of insect history is issued by J.S. Redfield, which will command the

public favor no less than the former volume, by its sparkling

delineations of rural life, and its beautiful illustrations of animal

economy. The author has a decided genius for delicate observation;

nothing escapes him, however minute, in his study of insect

idiosyncracy; and with a rich vein of poetic sentiment, and a luxuriant

bloom of all kindly, and natural household feelings, he throws a

delightful coloring of imagination around his descriptions, though

without impairing their evident fidelity to nature. The very titles of

his chapters have a delicious quaintness that leads every one who opens

the book to obtain a further taste of its quality. What charming fancies

lurk under such an inventory of topics as the following! "The Lady Bird

of our Childhood," "Things of a Day," "Insect Magicians," "A Love among

the Roses," "The Tribes of an Oak," "A Few Friends of our Summer

Gladness," "A Sylvan Morality, or a Word to Wives," "A Summer Day's

Dream," and the like, which are treated with a subtle development of

analogies, and exquisite propriety of expression. Whoever would enlarge

his preparation for a reverent communion with nature, and trace the

unfolding of the Divine Epos, in its sublime minuteness, should read

this volume under the shade of trees, and within the sound of running

waters.

_The Fate_, by G.P.R. JAMES (published by Harper and Brothers), is the

title of the latest offshoot of the luxuriant forest of romance, which

has recently been transplanted to this country without losing its

verdurous hues or its potent vitality. Mr. James evidently writes from

an inward necessity, as the trees grow, putting forth all sorts of

leaves, blossoms, and branches, in immeasurable profusion, and (may his

shadow never be less) he will always find a throng of weary wayfarers

who love to turn aside from the heated paths of life, and seek a

refreshing coolness in the grateful shade. The quaint moralities with

which he relieves the monotony of description are not without a certain

charm. They bring us nearer to the personality of the writer, than his

more elaborate dialogues. If the plots of his novels are constructed by

"horse-power," as has been maliciously said, no machinery could force

out the agreeable bits of ethical reflection, in which the novelist

speaks in his own name. And though not always free from common-place, as

we are bound to confess, they often present sharp touches of

good-natured satire, and a piercing insight into the convolutions of

vanity and weakness, showing the sagacity of a shrewd observer. These

"landing-places" are perhaps more frequent in this volume than in most

of the preceding ones, though there is no want of spirit or interest in

the movement of the plot. The scene of the novel is laid in England

during the civil wars succeeding the Restoration. It aims to present a

counterpart to Mr. Macaulay's picture of the condition of England in the

year 1685. The author enters his protest against that part of Macaulay's

"great and fanciful work," which refers to the English country gentlemen

and to the English country clergy of those times. His own sketches

present the state of society during that period in a more favorable

light. We are not sure but the historian has drawn more freely on the

imagination for his statements than the novelist. At all events, the

portraitures by Mr. James have a natural look, and seem to have been

taken from the life.

In one of the numerous episodes of this volume, the author, after the

example of American politicians, with whom he has now become familiar,

undertakes to "define his position" in regard to "the two solitary

horsemen," who, thus far, have usually not failed to make their

appearance, sooner or later, among the characters of his romances. We

are glad to have this knotty point cleared up so skillfully. These much

calumniated horsemen--one on a white horse--shall have the benefit of

their patron's ingenious defense of their "right to ride" in his own

words:

"As to repeating one's self, it is no very great crime, perhaps, for

I never heard that robbing Peter to pay Paul was punishable under any

law or statute, and the multitude of offenders in this sense, in all

ages, and in all circumstances, if not an excuse, is a palliation,

showing the frailty of human nature, and that we are as frail as

others--but no more. The cause of this self-repetition, probably, is

not a paucity of ideas, not an infertility of fancy, not a want of

imagination or invention, but that, like children sent daily to draw

water from a stream, we get into the habit of dropping our buckets

into that same immeasurable depth of thought exactly at the same

place; and though it be not exactly the same water as that which we

drew up the day before, it is very similar in quality and flavor, a

little clearer or a little more turbid, as the case may be. Now this

dissertation--which may be considered as an introduction or preface

to the second division of my history--has been brought about, has had

its rise, origin, source, in an anxious and careful endeavor to

avoid, if possible, introducing into this work the two solitary

horsemen--one upon a white horse--which, by one mode or another, have

found their way into probably one out of three of all the books I

have written; and I need hardly tell the reader that the name of

these books is legion. There are, perhaps, too many; but though I

must die, some of them will live--I know it, I feel it; and I must

continue to write while this spirit is in this body. To say truth, I

do not know why I should wish to get rid of my two horsemen,

especially the one on the white horse. Wouvermans always had a white

horse in all his pictures; and I do not see why I should not put my

signature, my emblem, my monogram, in my paper and ink pictures as

well as any painter of them all. I am not sure that other authors do

not do the same thing--that Lytton has not always, or very nearly, a

philosophizing libertine--Dickens, a very charming young girl, with

dear little pockets; and Lever, a bold dragoon. Nevertheless, upon my

life, if I can help it, we will not have in this work the two

horsemen and the white horse; albeit, in after times--when my name is

placed with Homer and Shakspeare, or in any other more likely

position--there may arise serious and acrimonious disputes as to the

real authorship of the book, from its wanting my own peculiar and

distinctive mark and characteristic.

"But here, while writing about plagiarism, I have been myself a

plagiary; and it shall not remain without acknowledgment, having

suffered somewhat in that sort myself. Hear my excellent friend,

Leigh Hunt, soul of mild goodness, honest truth, and gentle

brightness! I acknowledge that I stole from you the defensive image

of Wouvermans' white horse, which you incautiously put within my

reach, on one bright night of long, dreamy conversation, when our

ideas of many things, wide as the poles asunder, met suddenly without

clashing, or produced but a cool, quiet spark--as the white stones

which children rub together in dark corners emit a soft,

phosphorescent gleam, that serves but to light their little noses."

Phillips, Sampson, and Co. have published _The Inventor's Manual_, by

GEORGE TICKNOR CURTIS, being an abridgement of the author's larger

Treatise on the Patent Law. It presents the general principles of the

law on this subject, in a condensed and intelligible form, and furnishes

directions for making applications to the Patent Office, divested of the

technical learning, which can only serve to embarrass the practical

inventor.

_Memoir of the Rev. Edward Bickersteth_, by the Rev. T.R. BIRKS. This

genuine piece of old-fashioned religious biography is republished from

the London edition, by Harper and Brothers, with an Introduction by the

Rev. Dr. TYNG, of this city. It is almost exclusively the record of

Christian experience. Mr. Bickersteth was not distinguished for any

remarkable powers of mind. His character was of an ordinary texture. The

even tenor of his life was not diversified by any unusual incidents. But

his biography shows the power of earnest devotion to a great object,

sustained by clear and constant intellectual convictions, to call forth

an effective energy of action, and to invest the character with a

certain charm, although it presents no brilliant aspects in the daily

routine of life. Mr. Bickersteth was born in a quiet English village in

Westmoreland. He commenced his active career as a subordinate clerk in

the London Post-office. At this early period of his life, he exhibited

the same strength of religious principle, and the same fastidiousness of

moral perception, which were at the foundation of his subsequent

character. Indeed, his minute, rigid, ascetic adherence to formal rules

of conduct might be deemed premature. We find little exercise of the

free, gladsome spirit of youth, but on the contrary, a subjection to the

strictest system of self-discipline, which would have done no discredit

to a devotee. The habits thus formed were no doubt highly favorable to

the rigorous severity of purpose, with which he afterward devoted

himself to the performance of grave duties. His self-inflicted training

led him to regard religion almost exclusively in the light of

obligation, and as the natural result, his conscience not only gained

the mastery over his character, but to a great extent interfered with

the due exercise of other sentiments. Becoming weary of his employments

in the post-office, he determined to engage in the study of law, and was

at length articled as an attorney's clerk. Just before taking this step,

however, his religious feelings received a still stronger impulse. The

tone of his mind experienced a great change, and he became so absorbed

in religious ideas, as to make it obvious that he would find little that

was congenial in the profession of law.

After a series of obstacles, that were overcome only by great effort and

perseverance, Mr. Bickersteth was enabled to realize a wish which he had

long fondly cherished, and received ordination as a clergyman of the

English Church. From that time, his labors in his favorite sphere of

action were devoted and abundant. The missionary cause had always called

forth his warmest sympathies, and it now became the most cherished

object of his life. Its prosperity in England was greatly owing to his

zealous exertions. As Secretary of the Church Missionary Society, he has

identified his name with its interests. Nor was he less active in the

discharge of duty in other branches of his profession. His earnestness

was perpetual. Nothing could check his unrelenting industry. The usual

relaxations of society could not divert him from his high purpose. He

made use of the pulpit and the pen, with equal energy for the

accomplishment of his plans. His publications were numerous, and though

destitute of literary merit, had considerable influence in their day. He

wrought more, however, by his character than by his writings. His

unmistakable sincerity, his childlike simplicity, his consistency and

purity of intention, gave a contagious virtue to his example, and

enabled him to act both on individuals and on large bodies of men with

an unerring moral magnetism, which is never granted except to genuine

elevation of purpose, and an enthusiasm for an ideal aim, which throws

self into the shade.

This biography is prepared by the eldest daughter of Mr. Bickersteth and

her husband, a clergyman of the Established Church, by whom it was

undertaken at the request of their deceased parent, made during his last

illness. It has been compiled with discrimination and care, free use

being made of the voluminous correspondence of Mr. Bickersteth, which he

sustained with characteristic assiduity. Although it presents the memoir

of a person, who was less distinguished by splendid or imposing natural

endowments, than by his peculiar and conspicuous position in the

religious world, it affords many curious and suggestive illustrations of

human nature, which can not fail to be perused with interest by the

student in that science. To the religious public, strictly so called, it

will be one of the most enticing works that has appeared for some time.

_The Stone-Mason of Saint Point_, by LAMARTINE (published by Harper and

Brothers), is a simple rural tale, descriptive of peasant life in

France, abounding in fine touches of nature, and with less of the

fantastic and exaggerated than is usual in the prose fictions of the

author. It is pervaded with a deep religious sentiment, illustrating the

power of faith in the Divine Providence, and of devotion to the good of

others, in sustaining the soul under the severest calamities. His

pictures of the country are drawn from the experience of the writer. He

paints the scenes of his childhood, which are reproduced in a softened

and pensive aspect. If the sentiment is often too luscious for a sturdy

Saxon taste, it is redeemed by its pathos and earnestness, and will be

tolerated as a curious expression of French naivete.

_The True Remedy for the Wrongs of Woman_, by CATHARINE E. BEECHER,

published by Phillips, Sampson, and Co. This is not a controversial

work. It is rather an eloquent plea for the education of woman. It

contains little that is original, and nothing radical. The enterprise of

the author for the promotion of education in the West, is its main

topic. Her narrative of the annoyances and perplexities to which she has

been subjected in the prosecution of her plan is lively and graphic, and

not without a tinge of bitterness. The volume displays throughout a

masculine intellect, and sufficient energy of character for a

field-marshal.

_The Literature and Literary Men of Great Britain and Ireland_, by

ABRAHAM MILLS, is the title of a work just issued by Harper and Brothers

in two large octavo volumes, containing a full and comprehensive survey

of the progress of English literature, from its earliest development to

the present time. It has evidently been prepared with great industry,

and at the same time, shows a mature and cultivated taste, a sound

literary judgment, and an uncommon familiarity with the most eminent

English authors. The extracts from their writings, which compose the

staple of the work, are introduced with elaborate critical and

biographical notices, which betray a ripe scholarship, and no small

degree of sagacity. We believe these volumes will prove an admirable

contribution to a branch of education which has been too much neglected

in our higher seminaries of learning. A thorough grounding in the

elements of English literature is rare. At the same time, it is as

valuable an acquisition as the scholar can possess. It is folly to give

a secondary place to the treasures of our mother tongue, while so much

time is devoted to studies which are often wholly inapplicable to the

pursuits of after life. A thorough initiation into the beauties of the

English classics by a competent teacher, would be worth more, as a means

of aesthetic culture, than the whole circle of attainments with which one

often completes his college course. The present volumes will be found an

excellent guide to the knowledge of English literature, and we cordially

commend them to the attention of professors as well as of private

students.

_Arthur Conway_ is a spirited novel, with great variety of action and

incident, and a plot of the most exciting interest, forming the last

number of Harpers' "Select Library of Novels."

The _Odd-Fellows' Offering_ for 1852 (published by Edward Walker), is

the first annual that we have seen for the coming season. It is issued

in a style of substantial elegance, with a number of well-executed

engravings, and a highly finished illuminated presentation plate. Among

the most valuable contributions are the articles entitled "Napoleon's

First Love," by James Nack, "Blanaid," by Mary E. Hewitt, "The Destiny,"

by Mrs. E. Oakes Smith, "The Talkative and Taciturn," by Frederic

Saunders, "Peace," by Benson J. Lossing, and "The Second Ship," by Fanny

Green. Several of the shorter pieces are worthy of commendation, and the

volume as a whole is superior to the average of the ephemeral class of

literature to which it belongs.

_Elements of Algebra_, by Prof. LOOMIS (published by Harper and

Brothers), is a new elementary treatise on that science, intended for

the use of students who have just completed the study of arithmetic. The

author has aimed to present the subject with so much clearness and

simplicity, that any person who has acquired a tolerably familiar

knowledge of the principles of numbers may proceed to this volume with

advantage. In point of brevity and terseness of statement, it will be

found to have no superior. It abounds with practical examples, happily

adapted to illustrate the processes of algebra to the young beginner.

The development of the more difficult principles of the science, is so

gradual--the ascent from one step to another is made so facile--that the

student is enabled to master the elements of the subject without the

sense of weariness and discouragement, which often attends the use of a

text-book, in which the needs of the beginner are too much lost sight of

by the author.

_The Christian Retrospect and Register_, by ROBERT BAIRD, published by

M.W. Dodd. A summary of the scientific, moral, and religious progress of

the first half of the nineteenth century. The plan of this work is

excellent, but it is not carried out with good success. It is full of

omissions, and crude and superficial statements. Hurried through the

press without time for thorough preparation or revision, it is a

skeleton rather than a treatise, and is equally unworthy of the author

and of the subject.

_Roman Antiquities_, by CHARLES ANTHON, LL.D., is designed to furnish a

consecutive description of the manners and customs of the ancient

Romans, in a form adapted to popular reading. In the preparation of this

work, recourse has been had to the most recent and trustworthy

authorities; it includes the results of modern research; on obscure and

doubtful questions it is critical and discriminating; and its style,

for the most part, is remarkable for its copiousness and ease. Without

being encumbered with learned disquisitions, it presents a complete

statement of the points essential to the elucidation of Roman history.

Its excellent arrangement and attractive style render it a work which

may not only be occasionally consulted, but thoroughly read, with

interest and advantage. For popular use, it is not surpassed by any of

the previous contributions of the author to the cause of classical

literature. (Published by Harper and Brothers.)

_The History of the United States_, by RICHARD HILDRETH, Vol. V. (Harper

and Brothers). Mr. Hildreth is making rapid progress with his great

national work. We have now the fifth volume of the whole series, and the

second of the history since the adoption of the Federal Constitution. It

is devoted to the administrations of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson,

bringing down the narrative to the difficulties with England on account

of the affair of the Chesapeake in 1807. This period is fruitful in

topics of great historical interest. Among those which Mr. Hildreth has

investigated with the most exemplary diligence, and presented in his

usual plain and forcible style, are the state of parties subsequent to

the election of Adams, the struggle between Adams and his Federal

opponents, the downfall of the Federal party on the accession of

Jefferson, the purchase of Louisiana, the characters of Hamilton and

Burr, and the growth of the commercial troubles with Great Britain.

These are described with the same Doric severity of expression which

characterizes the previous volumes, with scarcely a flower of rhetoric

to entice the toiling reader. As an authentic and vigorous chronicle of

events, we still deem this work an important element in the study of

American history. If he does not rival the philosophical splendor of

Bancroft or the sweet amenities of Prescott, Mr. Hildreth has earned a

highly honorable niche among our native historians.

_Travels and Adventures in Mexico_, by WILLIAM W. CARPENTER (published

by Harper and Brothers), is a record of military service and wanderings

on foot, by a soldier in the late Mexican War, describing the manners

and customs of the people of Mexico, and the agricultural and mineral

resources of that country. The narrative is drawn up from notes taken on

the spot, and although the author bespeaks the indulgence of his readers

for his want of skill in composition, it is marked by such a high degree

of frankness and simplicity, that it can scarcely fail to prove

attractive to the majority of readers. He enjoyed unusual opportunities

for the observation of the Mexican character. Placed in circumstances

which made him familiar with all classes of society, he studied the

strange habits and striking features that came under his notice with

unsleeping vigilance, and has recorded his impressions, with apparent

accuracy and good faith. The course of his journeys led him through

various towns, which are off of the routes most frequented by travelers,

such as Salamanca, Guanahuato, Guadalajara, Ahuacatlan, and Tepic,

concerning which he presents a variety of valuable and interesting

information. Exposed to the casualties of military life, and for a long

time held a prisoner by the Mexicans, he has been able to gather up an

abundant store of incident and adventure, which he relates almost with

the freedom of a conversational style, but commanding the attention of

the reader to the close of the volume.

Editors Drawer.

It was an idea of the gifted author of "Ship and Shore," the late WALTER

COLTON, chaplain in the United States' Navy, who had witnessed many

burials at sea in his various voyages, that a body thus buried remained

suspended in a medium so dense that it was alike beyond the reach of

decay, or destruction by the "innumerable creeping things, both small

and great beasts," which inhabit the mighty deep. This theory gives an

added interest to the following beautiful passage from a discourse by

the Rev. Mr. Giles: "The SEA is the largest of all cemeteries, and its

slumberers sleep without a monument. All other grave-yards, in all other

lands, show some symbol of distinction between the great and the small,

the rich and the poor: but in that ocean-cemetery the king and the

clown, the prince and the peasant, are alike undistinguished. The same

waves roll over all; the same requiem by the minstrelsy of the ocean is

sung to their honor. Over their remains the same storm beats and the

same sun shines; and there, unmarbled, the weak and the powerful, the

plumed and the unhonored, will sleep on until awakened by the same trump

when the sea shall 'give up its dead!'"

* * * * *

Few things were more characteristic of the colored servants living with

the old families of the North many years ago, than their high-flown

language, and the deference which they endeavored to exact from those of

their race whom they thought below themselves in a dependent position,

and even of the whites whose social scale was beneath that of their own

especial masters. A friend mentioned to us recently an amusing

illustration of this: Some years ago, "EBEN," as he was called, a

colored servant of Mr. A----, an old and opulent citizen of a

flourishing and beautiful city in Connecticut, obtained leave to use his

master's sleigh and horses, to take his sable inamorata "a-sleighing" to

a neighboring road-side inn, a popular resort, at certain seasons, even

for the elite of the town whence it derived its principal support. About

nine o'clock "EBEN" drove up, and throwing the reins to the stable-boy,

in the most stately manner, he helped out "Miss Dinah" with an air that

would have befitted a colored Count D'Orsay, and the pair made their way

to the principal sitting-room, where a bright and cheerful fire was

blazing up the wide-backed chimney. Here, having seated his "lady" in

state, he rang a little hand-bell on the table. The landlord entered.

"Is _dis_ you' best room, landlord?" "Yes," replied the landlord,

"yes--doesn't it suit you?" "W'y, yes, sa, it suit if dere ain't no

_better_, sa. We want some fresh'ents--best you got; sumfin nice--quick:

an' look a' hea: gib my hosses couple tub o' oats, two ton o' hay, and

two bushel o' water! An', we don't want no odder company, sa, in our

'partment: don't let in no colored pussons, sa." The landlord, who had

known the old servant before he had gone to live with Mr. A---- (a fact

which _he_ did not know, or had forgotten), said, "EBEN, where do you

live now?" "Mr. A---- lib wid me, down on de Plain," said "EBEN,"

speaking very quickly; "but I t'ank you, sa, w'en you speak to me, to

call me by _both_ my names: I got _two_ names, sa." "Ah?--well, EBEN,

what is your _other_ name?" "My middle name is 'NEZER, sa, and I'd t'ank

you to recollect 'im!" "Poor, faithful, simple-hearted 'Eben!'" said the

friend who mentioned this incident to us, he has followed 'Uncle Ned,'

and 'gone where the good niggers go;' but he will long be remembered by

all who ever knew him. He it was who, on one occasion, when about to

take a letter to a certain quarter of the city, and when asked if he

knew where the house was, replied, "I wish I had as many dollars as I

know where dat house is!" The sum was not computable by any rule known

to arithmetic, mathematics, or any cognate "science of numbers." On

another occasion he was describing an execution of a colored man, which

he had been to see. "When he went upon the platform," said he, "he was

extremely overcome, and I thought, at one time, dat he _wouldn't

survive_!" The probability is, that he _didn't_ long!

* * * * *

One of "Nature's true Nobility," an educated, independent farmer in the

country, after walking over his rich paternal acres, amidst his "fields

ripe for the harvest," and his noble flocks and herds, sits down and

writes the following passage in a letter to a gentleman of this city:

"The scene has changed on the farm since I wrote you last. Blades and

blossoms have turned to ears and fruit; spring to summer; seed-time to

harvest. The birds have changed their notes, and seem to sing as if from

a sense of duty only. The trees, instead of being fresh and green, are

only shady. Brooks seem to be growing tired, and gardens no longer

conceal their faded flowers. The noon of the year is at hand. Even now

we feel its sultry heat; we are dazzled by its golden light. Reapers

will soon go out to gather the ripened grain. Store-houses and barns

will soon be filled again with the bounties of GOD. Is it not a pleasant

season, a profitable halting-time; a point of prospect, from which we

may look backward and forward? Has it no analogy to the Present of our

own lives--yours, and mine, and ----'s? Does it not bid us look to _our_

harvests, that we may gather in season, and be furnished for the long

winter which approacheth? Gather, I mean, in those great moral fields

which GOD has opened around us, and filled with incorruptible fruits:

knowing that _they_, too, have their appropriate seasons, and that as to

_them_, also the harvest will soon pass, the summer will soon end? Let

us keep in mind, then, dear ----, the great truth, that,

"Loitering slow the Future creepeth,

Arrow-swift the Present sweepeth,

And motionless forever stands the Past!"

* * * * *

"'I had been out a-fishing in the 'Old South Bay,'" said a Long Island

subscriber the other day, "with one of those crafty fishermen to whom

_no_ days, on which the water may be tempted, are considered days for

'bad luck;' '_dies infaustus_' being a term unknown in his calendar. He

was one of those 'long-necked clam'-eaters, whose stomach rose and fell

with the tides which made them plentiful or left them scarce. As we were

coming in in our boat, after a successful foray upon bass and

sheepshead, we 'fell to meditate' upon various matters which were

neither piscatory nor akin to it. As Boswell would say of the colloquies

of the Great Leviathan: 'We spoke of Ghosts.' 'You say ghosts have been

_seen_ on Long Island, but _you_ never seen 'em, and don't believe in

'em!' 'Wal, yes, I can't say I do believe in 'em, but I guess I _should_

believe in 'em, ef I had such luck in gettin' a sight on 'em as a man

did down to Jerusalem-South a good many years ago. The way of it was

this: You see, it was a dreadful cold winter's night, about nine o'clock

(how the Old South Bay roared that night)! when there was a sleigh with

three fellows into it, druv up under the hoss-shed at the tavern. Two

on 'em got out; and as they got out, they said to 't'other one, 'Jim,

jist you sit there and mind the hosses while we go in and git somethin'

warmin': we'll be right out agin.' They went into the tavern, but they

_didn't_ 'come right out again' by a jug-full, though when they _did_

come out they had more than a jug-full apiece into 'em--both on 'em

had--ha! ha! 'Fore they come out, though, BILL the 'ostler said to the

man sittin' in the sleigh, 'Ef I was you I wouldn't sit there in the

cold as long as you're a-sittin', blamed if I would: why don't _you_ go

in and get somethin' too?" The man never said nothin', though, in

answer, but sot up as straight as an Indian. Bill, who was lookin' after

some other hosses under the same shed, a'ter a while said somethin' more

to him, but he was as still as a 'yster. Pooty soon Bill said to

hisself, 'Goy-blamed ef I don't think he's friz to death, or else he'd

say _somethin'_!' So he went up to him and shook him; and sure enough,

he found him fruz as stiff as a stake; and when he come to hold up his

lantern to look, he found him propped up on each side on the seat; the

lines was wound round his hands; he was muffled up with comforters about

his face--and he was stone-dead!

"'Bill wasn't nobody's fool, ef he _did_ attend to hosses. He smelt the

whole thing out to-once. Two or three graves had been robbed about there

only a little while before, and the two chaps in the tavern was two

body-gatherers that had been paid by doctors to get bodies for 'em, for

to cut up, and they'd been and robbed a new grave that night; and here

was the corpse, wrapped up and propped up in that sleigh, so that folks

wouldn't suspicion nothing about it! Now what d'you 'spose Bill does? He

goes and takes, Bill does, that body out of the sleigh (for he wasn't

afraid of the very devil), strips off the clothes, and puts it into the

oat-bin inside, and fastens the door: then he puts on the dead man's

clothes hisself, and _he_ goes and gets into the sleigh with 'em onto

him, puts the lines round his hands, props hisself up, and waits for the

body-snatchers to come out from the bar-room. Pooty soon, out they come,

got in on the wide seat along side of him, and druv off. There Bill

sits, as stiff as a rail; but 'twasn't long 'fore one o' the chaps says

to t'other, feelin o' Bill's leg a little, 'Why, the body's gettin'

warm! Feel o' that leg!' T'other one put down his hand and felt o'

Bill's legs; and then _he_ started back and said: 'It's a fact, by

Thunder! it _is_ warm, and _no_ mistake!' 'Twas Bill's time, now: so he

turned his head round, stiff-like and straight, without moving his body,

and says he, '_Warm?_--wal, I guess you'd be WARM ef you'd been took out

o' h-ll only a little while ago, as _I_ was!'

"'Bill says it wan't half a second 'fore both o' them chaps had pitched

head-first out o' that sleigh, and n'ither on 'em stopped runnin' till

they was clean out o' sight. Then he turned right square round and druv

back to the tavern. There he told the whole story; and he made a good

spec. out o' the thing too, in the end; for you see, the friends of the

man that was dug up guv him fifty dollars for savin' of the body, and as

nobody ever come back a'ter the sleigh and hosses, he sold 'em to

Captain B----, down on H---- Plains, for nigh upon three hundred

dollars! 'Twas a fust-rate team--so they said. That's the most

profitable and about the only ghost that ever _I_ heerd tell on! Good

many folks _talks_ about seein' 'em, but I expect they never _did_--not

_r'ally_.'"

* * * * *

It was not an uncommon thing in England, before the abuse was corrected

by an especial act of Parliament, for interested parties to secure the

incarceration, in private asylums for lunatics, of those who, from

pecuniary or other considerations, they were desirous of "_getting_ out

of the way, and _keeping_ out of the way:" but in this country the

difficulty attending such transactions rendered them infrequent of

execution. Yet as late as in October, 1847, a learned clergyman of the

Church of England, of unique mind, and in his manners not a copyist of

others, was imprisoned in a lunatic asylum not three hundred miles from

New York, on the alleged ground that he was "crazy." The truth was soon

discovered, however, and he was liberated; but the result arose from a

mere accident. The victim had asked permission, on a Sunday, to attend

church. The request was refused. A second demand to the same effect was

met with: "If you ask to go to church again, we shall confine you to the

'second floor'"--a hall with cells and grated windows, and seldom

entered by visitors. Whereupon the incarcerated clergyman, who had not

been prohibited from having writing materials, sent to the overseer of

the institution the following lines:

"Go on, go on! your prison den

No terrors has for me:

GOD is my shield! why fear I then

A moment's tyranny?

"Vain man may bind his fellow clay,

Incarcerate the wise,

Dungeons shut out the cheerful day,

And darkness shroud my eyes:

"Go on, go on! free FANCY smiles,

And soars on golden wings,

The Spirit spurns your petty wiles--

The MUSE, unfettered, sings!

"Bring on, bring here your threats and chains,

IMAGINATION bind!

Bring grates, bring all your iron panes--

Cage in the steadfast mind!

"Your power is faint, your threatenings naught,

What empire have ye now?

This poor, frail body--not one thought--

Shall to your thralldom bow.

"Sure is that day not distant far,

When TRUTH shall claim her son,

Offended Justice wake the war,

And speak in thunder-tone:

"How did ye dare, on MERCY'S plea,

Abuse her sacred name,

Till violated Liberty

Bring in her sternest claim.

"Now Justice reign, bereft of sight,

For mortal woes and fears;

In Freedom's cause uphold the Right!

Back, back, ye struggling tears!"

These lines seemed to create an impression, in the minds of those who

saw them, that there was at least some "method" in the writer's

"madness," and the requisite inquisition soon put an end to his

incarceration. He is now, as he was then, a learned and accomplished

divine, and is at present preaching to a large and flourishing

congregation in a sister city.

* * * * *

We have heard much of the sagacity of the elephant; of those qualities

which DUGALD STEWART places far above mere instinct (namely, memory and

forecaste), which he possesses; but we never knew until lately, that an

elephant had an "ear for music!" But it appears that there was at

Mayence, in 1811, an elephant who was a great lover of sweet sounds. The

musicians of the city treated him with a concert of instrumental music,

which had a very powerful effect upon him. He expressed his delight by

frequently flapping his great leather-apron ears, and rolling from side

to side. A solo upon a horn almost transported him. He "put himself in

motion," beat time with his trunk, and expressed his approval of the

performance by the distinct but subdued emission of vocal applause.

Think of an elephant applauding at the opera, or one of JENNY LIND'S

concerts!

* * * * *

It will have been observed, by those who have read the recent speeches

of a celebrated American orator and statesman, with what beautiful

simplicity and force brief passages or phrases from the BIBLE come in

aid of his eloquence. And well would it be if these qualities were

studied more by our public speakers from that good "BOOK of books." Sir

WILLIAM JONES expressed his opinion that the BIBLE contained "more true

sublimity, more exquisite beauty, more pure morality, more important

history, and finer strains of eloquence and poetry, than could be

collected from all other books, in whatever language or age they might

have been written." FISHER AMES and PATRICK HENRY, pre-eminent American

orators, did not hesitate to go further, and declare, that "no man ever

did or ever could become truly eloquent, without being a constant reader

of the Bible, and an admirer of the purity and sublimity of its

language."

* * * * *

If the following amusing circumstance had been narrated in the pages of

the veracious historian, DIEDRICH KNICKERBOCKER, it would have been set

down to the credit of a fertile fancy on the part of that illustrious

historian, rather than believed as a fact. But the occurrence here

detailed is a veritable one, and happened many years ago in the county

of York, Pennsylvania. It is a forcible illustration of that undoubted

and undoubting Dutch honesty which made New Amsterdam so famous in the

olden time.

It seems, from the record, that there were two early German settlers, in

the western part of the county, whose names were PETER ---- and JOHN ----.

Peter had increased the size of his farm, by annexing to it a small

tract of land adjoining, and he lacked about a hundred dollars of the

sum which it was necessary to pay for his new acquisition. He called

upon his neighbor John, to borrow the amount. John consented at once,

and going into another room, he brought out an old bread-basket, and

counted down the desired number of dollars; and then the two sat down to

two large earthen mugs of cider and as many pipes of tobacco. After

smoking over the matter for a while, it occurred to Peter that in

similar transactions he had seen or heard something like a _note_

passing between the borrower and lender, and he suggested as much to

John. The lender assented to the propriety of such a course; paper, pen,

and ink, were produced; and between the two a document was concocted,

stating that John had loaned Peter one hundred dollars, which Peter

would repay to John in "tree mont's." This Peter signed; and thus far

the two financiers made the thing "all regular, and ship-shape."

But at this point a difficulty presented itself. They both knew that

notes were made in the operation of borrowing and lending, which they

had witnessed; but neither of them had observed what disposition was

made of the document: neither could tell whether it was for the borrower

or the lender to take charge of the paper. Here was a dilemma! At last a

bright idea struck John: "You haves de money to pay, Peter, so you must

take dis paper, so as you can _see_ as you haf to pay it." This was

conclusive: the common sense of the thing was unanswerable; and Peter

pocketed the money and his own note, so "as he could _see_ as he haf to

pay it!"

Three months passed over; and punctually to the day appeared Peter, and

paid over the promised sum to John. This being done, the mugs and pipes

were again brought out. After puffing awhile, Peter produced the note,

and handed it to John, with the remark: "_Now_, John, _you_ must take de

note, so as you can see the money haf been paid!"

It strikes us that this incident is only second to the "balancing of the

books" by weighing, passing receipts, and mulcting the constable in the

amount of costs, as recorded by the sage historian of Manahatta.

* * * * *

We believe it is a German poet who, walking "silent and thoughtful by

the solemn shore of the vast ocean we must sail so soon," thus speaks

"_The Ship of Death_:"

"By the shore of Time, now lying

On the inky flood beneath,

Patiently, thou SOUL undying!

Waits for thee the Ship of Death!

"He who on that vessel starteth,

Sailing from the sons of men,

To the friends from whom he parteth

Never more returns again!

"From her mast no flag is flying,

To denote from whence she came;

She is known unto the dying--

AZAEL is her captain's name.

"Not a word was ever spoken,

On that dark, unfathom'd sea;

Silence there is so unbroken,

She herself seems not to be!

"Silent thus, in darkness lonely,

Doth the SOUL put forth alone,

While the wings of angels only

Waft her to a LAND UNKNOWN."

How many are departing daily in that "Ship of Death!" "Good Heaven!"

exclaims one, "how often are we to die before we go off this stage! In

every friend we lose, we lose a part of ourselves, and the best part.

GOD keep those we have left!"

* * * * *

The following ludicrous occurrence finds its way into the "Drawer," on a

blank-leaf of a business-letter, from a flourishing town in Illinois: "A

manufacturer of tombstones, in our place, lately received a call from a

countryman, who wanted a stone to place over the grave of his mother.

After looking around for some time, and making sundry remarks about the

taste of his deceased mother, he finally pitched upon one which the

stone-cutter had prepared for another person. 'I like _this_ one,' said

he. 'But,' said the manufacturer, 'that belongs to another man, and has

Mrs. PERRY'S name cut on it: it wouldn't do for your mother.' 'O, yes,

it would,' said the countryman, 'she couldn't _read_! And besides,' he

continued, as he observed the wonderment of the stone-cutter, 'PERRY was

always a favorite name of hers, any how!'" This anecdote reminds us of a

kindred occurrence, which actually took place in this good city of

Gotham. A parvenu, who had set up his carriage in great state, went to a

harness-maker to have "a silver letter" put on the blinders of his

horses. "What letter shall I put on?" asked the harness-maker. "Well, I

don't _know_, exactly," answered the pompous "patron;" but, after

hesitating a moment, he said, "Well; I guess W is about as handsome a

letter as you can put on--isn't it?"

* * * * *

In the "marriage of language to music and feeling," as the great German,

GOETHE, expresses it, ALFRED TENNYSON has but few equals, and probably

no superior at the present day. A modern English critic, in a review of

his _Princess_, observes: Mr. TENNYSON is not, we believe, a connoisseur

in music, as MOORE was; yet look at the songs in 'The Princess.' Take

the 'Bugle Song,' for example, unequaled in our language, except by

SHAKSPEARE:

'The splendor falls on castle walls,

And snowy summits old in story:

The long light shakes across the lakes,

And the wild cataract leaps in glory:

Blow, bugle, blow--set the wild echoes flying,

Blow, bugle; answer echoes, dying, dying, dying!

'O hark! O hear! how thin and clear,

And thinner, clearer, farther going!

O sweet and far from cliff and scar

The horns of Elfland faintly blowing!

Blow! let us hear the purple glens replying

Blow, bugle! answer echoes, dying, dying, dying!

'O love, they die in yon rich sky,

They faint on hill, on field, on river:

_Our_ echoes roll from soul to soul,

And grow forever and forever:

Blow, bugle! blow; set the wild echoes flying,

And answer echoes, answer, dying, dying, dying!'

"True," says the reviewer, "this is an imitation, in words, of the

actual sounds of bugle-music; but it had been little to let us hear, in

the wonderful combination of liquid, ringing consonants, and resounding

vowels, the 'horns of Elfland faintly blowing,' had not the poet told us

in the same key of sound, how

'The splendor falls on castle walls,

And snowy summits old in story:'

investing with one uniting halo, first the scenery, then the music

itself, and lastly the human thoughts and feelings which remind him that

'_Our_ echoes roll from soul to soul,

And grow forever and forever:'

embodying, in the oneness of the sensuous framework, the spiritual

harmony of the whole inward and outward impression, the luscious

languor, the stately splendor, the thoughts which follow into infinity

the dying echoes of the air." This is true criticism, and is

confirmatory of an impression which we have long entertained, that it

requires something more than laborious pains-taking, something

different, and better, than a mere careful selection of melodious or

sounding words, and a felicitous collocation of them, to give a man a

poetical reputation that is worth possessing.

* * * * *

The western lawyers, who "hire out their words and anger," are somewhat

amenable to the charge brought against them by transatlantic writers, of

looseness and bombast in their arguments and oratory. In a recent case

of capital crime, before a far-western jury, the lawyer addressed to

them, among other similar arguments, the following: "The BIBLE says,

'Thou shalt not kill!' Now do you know, gentlemen, that if you go to

hang my client, the prisoner at the bar, that you commit murder? You

_do_, and 'no mistake;' for murder is _murder_, whether it is committed

by twelve men in what is called a box--and a 'bad box' you'll find it if

you don't give a righteous verdict--or a humble individual, like my

client. S'posing my client _had_ killed a man; I say, _s'posing_ he had;

is that any reason why _you_ should kill a man?--twelve of you on one!

No, gentlemen of the jury, you may bring the prisoner at the bar, my

client, in guilty; the hangman may do his duty, but will that exonerate

_you_? No such thing! You will all, individually and collectively, you

will _all_ of you be murderers!" This profound argument had its effect.

The verdict of the jury was: "_Not guilty if he'll quit the State!_"

* * * * *

Our neighbors across the water indulge themselves in occasional comments

upon the personal ostentation and desire for external display, which

they regard as the besetting folly of our people. There is an old adage

of "Look at home," which it seems to us it would not be amiss for

"honest JOHN" to bear in mind. One of his own writers recently said, "An

Englishman will forego a horse and cabriolet that will serve to convey

him comfortably to his friends, and give him air, pleasure, and variety,

if he can not do it in an expensive style and manner, mounting a lackey

behind, bedaubed with gold lace. Pride, purse-pride, is the besetting

sin of England; and like most other sins, brings its own punishment, by

converting existence into a struggle, and environing it with gloom and

despondency." This is a criticism, be it understood, of an Englishman

upon Englishmen, in the present state of English society. Now to show

how it was aforetime, and that what BULL charges _us_ with, is a

besetting sin and folly of his own, hear the quaint THOMAS NASHE, who

wrote in 1593:

"ENGLAUND, the players' stage of gorgeous attyre, the ape of all

nations' superfluities, the continuall masquer in outlandish

habilements, great plenty-scanting calamities art thou to await, for

wanton disguising thyself against kind, and digressing from the

plainnesse of thine Auncesters; scandalous and shamefull is it, that

not anie in thee (Fishermen and husbandmen set aside) but lyve above

their ability and birth; that the outward habite (which in other

countries is the only distinction of honour), shoulde yeelde in thee

no difference of persons: that all thy auncient Nobilitie, (almost,)

with this gorgeous prodigalitie, should be devoured and eaten uppe,

and up-starts inhabite their stately Pallaces, who from farre have

fetcht in this vanitie of pride to entrappe and to spoyle them. Those

of thy people that in all other things are miserable, on their

apparaile will be prodigal. No Lande can so unfallibly experience

this proverbe, _The hoode makes not the Moncke_ as thou: for Tailers,

serving-men, Make-shifts, and Gentlemen in thee are confounded. For

the compassment of bravery we hear theye will robbe, steale, cozen,

cheate, betray their owne Fathers, sweare and forsweare, or doe any

thing. Take away braverie, you kill the hart of lust and

incontinencie. Wherefore doe men make themselves brave, but to riot

and to revell? Looke after what state theyr apparaile is, that state

they take to them and carry, and after a little accustoming to that

carriage, persuade themselves they are such indeede."

* * * * *

There is that in the following brief social homily which renders it

worthy of a better preservation than an inscription upon an

unappropriated slip of paper in the "Drawer:" "There is no better

evidence of ill-breeding than the practice of interrupting another in

conversation while speaking, or commencing a remark before another has

fully closed. No well-bred person ever does it, nor continues

conversation long with a person who _does_ do it. The latter often finds

an interesting conversation abruptly waived, closed, or declined by the

former, without even suspecting the cause. A well-bred person will not

even interrupt one who is in all respects greatly his inferior. If you

wish to judge the good-breeding of a person with whom you are but little

acquainted, observe him, or her, strictly in this respect, and you will

not be deceived. However intelligent, fluent, or easy one may appear,

this practice proves the absence of true politeness. It is often amusing

to see persons, priding themselves on the gentility of their manners,

and putting forth all their efforts to appear to advantage in many other

respects, so readily betray all in this particular."

Fashions for September

[Illustration: FIG. 1.--PROMENADE AND HOME COSTUME.]

The warm weather, which generally continues until the middle of this

month, makes a change in the materials for dresses quite unnecessary,

and we report some slight novelties in mode rather than change in

fabrics.

The figure on the left, in the above illustration, exhibits an elegant

style of WALKING TOILETTE.--Silk drawn bonnet. The poke is made on a

whalebone skeleton. Crown reclining, trimmed with a silk _fanchon_,

edged with two _ruches_, one blue, the other same color as the silk. A

similar double _ruche_ runs along the edge of the poke and curtain. This

last is very full. On one side are small bunches of forget-me-nots, with

a little foliage. The ribbons or edges are worked in festoons. Dress and

mantelet of plain silk with band _a disposition_ trimmed with fringed

ribbon. The scarf-mantelet is low on the neck; it is cut with a point,

and the part of the top which folds like a shawl falls over the other,

from the front, and behind is continued in a point following the shape

of the lower part. The band is clouded with blue and green on nut-color,

and is detached from the ground by a narrow white fillet; below there is

a plain part which forms a hem, under which are sewed fringed ribbons of

the same color as the stuff, the threads being alternately an inch of

blue and an inch of green. The fringe of the shawl part is from 6 to 7

inches deep at top, that at bottom from 9 to 10 inches. The body is

open, and there is a _chine_, or clouded band, about an inch from the

edge. The skirt has two tucks along each of which runs a clouded band

with a hem of about an inch, and a deep fringe. The upper one reaches to

within 1-1/2 inch of the band at bottom. Therefore, if the skirt is 44

inches deep, there are 10 of fringe, 8 of interval, 10 more of fringe,

and the rest forms the band and the top of the skirt. The collar is

composed of three rows of lace turned down, and the front of the

habit-shirt is formed of three rows of beautiful lace, having the

appearance of a very full triple shirt frill.

The other figure, on the right, shows a beautiful style of HOME

TOILETTE.--The hair is arranged in waved bands, short and puffed. A

cambric chemisette with small plaits, a raised collar of two frills very

finely plaited, and edged with a very narrow _valenciennes_. Sleeves

half-large, of cambric, plaited small; and ending in a stitched

wrist-band with two plaited trimmings, and narrow _valenciennes_, like

the collar. Waistcoat body of white quilting, open in front; the collar,

which turns down, is narrow, rounded at the corner, and is continued in

a little lapel like a man's waistcoat. The lappets are not sewed on at

the waist; they are formed by the hollowing of the seams; the front

lappet opens and rounds off on the hip. Behind, it is continued square,

with an opening at each seam. The sleeves have an elbow, and a cuff

turned up, with the corners rounded off. There is a small pocket on each

of the front lappets. The buttons are coral. All the edges of this

garment have a double row of stitches. The skirt is made of Scotch

poplin.

[Illustration: FIGS. 2 AND 3.--BONNET AND HEAD-DRESS.]

There is a greater variety in the style of bonnets than in dresses.

Among the most elegant are a drawn bonnet of white lace, hair, and

straw, mounted on a net foundation, with a small poke formed by

bouillons of white _gros de Naples_, placed cross-wise, and separated

from each other, by an extremely narrow straw ornament. These bouillons

spread between two spaces of straw lace, half an inch wide, one of which

forms the edge of the poke, and the other comes at the bottom of the

crown. The curtain is very deep, of the same lace, surmounted by a band

of silk. Inside are two small bunches of field-flowers, mixed with

blades of grass. Another bonnet is composed of cross-pieces of lisse

crape, laid flat in contrary directions, and trimmed with three deep

blonds, placed according to fancy. The edge is open-work blond. At the

bottom of each cross-piece is a roll of shot silk, intended to give

relief. Trimmed on the side with a cabbage rose, or marabouts; the

curtain, crape and blond. A novel style of drawn bonnet for mourning,

is composed of half ornaments of black and white hair, and half narrow

flounces of rose-leaf, small-striped ribbons. Each of them is zebraed

with three small pink stripes of equal width; but the ribbons are so

matched, that these stripes gradually increase in width, and form a very

pleasing diversity. Figure 2 represents a very pretty style. The poke of

the bonnet of rice-straw, having at the edge in front one row of about

an inch wide, and continued, without being cut, along the bottom of the

curtain, which is very large and wholly of rice-straw. The crown forms

three divisions. Those of the two sides, arranged in the shape of a

ram's horns, are composed of three bouillonnes, separated by narrow rows

about a quarter of an inch. These bouillonnes, beginning at top, form on

each side a kind of semi-circle. The top of the crown between these two

parts is formed of nineteen or twenty flat plaits of silk, separated

from each other by a narrow row of rice-straw. On the side of the bonnet

is a branch of a rose-tree with buds and leaves, which begins wide at

bottom and gets narrower up the poke. Inside, ribbons and flowers.

Figure 3 represents a pretty style of head-dress for a home toilette.

The hair is disposed in bandeaux, and tied low behind. The head-dress is

composed of tufts of silk ribbons, and bunches of velvet bows. These

ribbons are mounted on elastic springs, which hold them well on the

head.

[Illustration: FIG 4--CHEMISETTE]

Chemisettes and habit-shirts form a part of almost every costume, and

when arranged with taste, are very elegant. They are of almost every

variety of pattern, and some of them, trimmed with fine lace, are very

costly. Our engraving represents a very neat pattern, and quite simple.

It is made of the usual material, and trimmed with two rows of festooned

bands with insertions to match.

Scarfs are beginning to be quite fashionable. Owing to long disuse, they

possess the charm of novelty. The mantelets have, for some time, been

approaching in form the scarf of former days, and this graceful portion

of a full dress, will doubtless soon be in general vogue.

Waistcoats, too, are gaining favor, and their style very nearly

resembles those worn by gentlemen. In fact, the ladies seem determined

to reduce the volume of their dresses. This is manifested abroad by the

prevailing taste for close fitting jackets, and at home by the general

favor in which the "Bloomers" are held. There are signs of radical

changes in costume, which neither sneers, caricatures, or serious

opposition, can prevent. Health and good taste demand a reform, and

common sense will doubtless second the demand with powerful effect.

End of Project Gutenberg's Harper's New Monthly Magazine, by Various

Harper's New Monthly Magazine No. XVI.—September, 1851—Vol. III. · 第 14 / 14 章