II.

Count Tolstoï’s literary life is divided very sharply into three

periods; or, if the expression be preferred, his powerful talent,

original from the very first, has passed through three phases. He began

by writing works which are mainly the working up of reminiscences

or illustrations of personal impressions. In the “War Sketches,”

in “Childhood and Youth,” in “The Cossacks,” the writer confines

himself to narration. Of these three writings, the one that best

shows Tolstoï’s talent in the first part of his career is the romance

entitled “Kazaki,” which, to use Turgénief’s words, is “an incomparable

picture of men and things in the Caucasus.” In a detailed analysis of

this masterpiece, we shall find the definition of Tolstoï’s manner at

the time of his forceful youth.

The second period is that of ripe age; it is filled by the two great

novels “War and Peace,” and “Anna Karénina.” The writer’s manner has

singularly broadened; even the dimensions of the frame-work of the

fiction have taken an almost exaggerated aspect. “War and Peace”

makes not less than eighteen hundred pages. “Anna Karénina” appeared

in the “Russki Vyestnik,” not in the course of months, but of years.

It is true that between two parts of the work the author stopped, as

though he had lost interest in its publication. But the public did

not lose its interest by waiting; and when, after more than half a

year, the narrator resumed the broken thread of his story, his readers

found themselves, as it were, dazzled by the return of the brilliant

characters of the romance, after this long and dismal eclipse.

In the novels of this second period, argument forces its way in under

cover of fiction. Thus, in “Anna Karénina,” which is the story of an

adultery, Tolstoï has not only tried to present us with a very accurate

picture of aristocratic customs in Russia; he has not only wished to

show as the centre and powerful fascination in this series of pictures,

the very subtle, very penetrating, very accurate study of a soul

wounded by love, the wound of which becomes more and more painful under

the effect of the friction and worriments following her first fault:

but he has also wished to attack, to settle in his own way, a problem

in the social order; he wished to express his opinion about marriage,

about separation, about divorce, about celibacy, about unions freely

agreed upon and religiously maintained.

“War and Peace,” likewise, is a sort of semi-military, semi-domestic

epos; or, if you like, it is a broad study of Russian life, and

especially of aristocratic life, whether in the camps, whether in

the parlors, whether in the residences of the proprietors during the

first quarter of this century, and more especially at the time of the

invasion. But within this ample scope the author expresses his theories

on military art, his private opinions on the state of war and on the

state of peace, his philosophic doctrine of destiny, or his religious

fatalism. Some of the characters in “War and Peace” seem at certain

times to give a prophetic hint of the dogma which Count Tolstoï will

adopt a little later. In Pierre Bezukhof are seen the aspirations

towards the ideal which the author of “My Religion” will soon be

preaching to men.

If his teaching at this time encroaches on the romance, still it

understood how to use marvellously well that vehicle for dissemination

wherever the Russian language is spoken; and we shall see, in analyzing

them, that the two works of Tolstoï’s second manner show a power and

a brilliancy that are truly Shaksperian. But the mysticism, traces of

which are found in these works, will develop in their author to such

a degree as to make him look upon a novel as an object of scandal,

as a “flood of oil thrown on the fire of erotic sensuality.” He will

therefore renounce the inventions of romance; he will sacrifice

fiction, which now he calls “licentious;” he will not take up the pen,

except to perform the work of a doctor or an evangelist; he will write

“My Confession,” “My Religion,” the “Commentary on the Gospels.” Of

these three works which illustrate Count Lyof Tolstoï’s third manner,

the reader will be interested especially in knowing about the first

two. He will even find that we have already said enough about “My

Confession,” and he will take it kindly if we reserve merely “My

Religion” for analysis. In return, he will allow us to dwell upon it,

and to speak of it entirely at our ease.

Before entering upon the study of “The Cossacks,” it will not be idle

to run quickly over a little story which might serve in place of an

introduction to a translation of this romance. This story, consisting

of only a few pages, is entitled “Recollections of a Scorer.”[47] It is

the story of a rich young man, who, having full control of his fortune,

is led by laziness in a short time to degradation and ruin. Nekliudof

falls into the society of debauchees and professional gamblers. They

pluck him, and ruin him. At his first appearance in this society, he

has a feeble nature, but not vulgar. He had some honor: disgusted by

the lowness of one of the gamblers, he demands reparation, calls him

a coward when he refuses to fight, and compels him to leave the club

forever. He had a sense of shame: on the day following a most debasing

night, when he had been made intoxicated and initiated into all the

depths of debauchery, he bursts into tears, declaring that he will

never forgive either himself or his companions in the orgie. Passion

for gambling keeps him bound to them; he sinks so low that soon he

plays, not only with his habitual partners, but with the servant who

fills the functions of scorer. One by one he descends all the steps of

a sickening and abject degradation. He is ruined, and disappears.[48]

He returns one fine day, enters the club, asks for writing materials,

and, having finished his letter, summons the scorer: “I would like

to try one more game with you.” He gains. “Haven’t I learned to play

well? Hey?”--“Very well.”--“Now go and order my carriage.” “He started

to walk up and down the room. Not suspecting any thing, I went

down to call his carriage; but there was no carriage there. I went

up-stairs again; and, as I approached the billiard-room, I thought I

heard a slight noise, like a knock with a cue. I went in. I noticed a

strange smell. I looked around: what did I see? He was stretched out

on the floor, bathed in his own blood ... a pistol near him. I was so

terror-struck that I could not make a sound. He gave a few signs of

life; he stretched out his legs, gave the death-rattle, and all was

over.”

If this young Russian had possessed a stronger nature or less enfeebled

elasticity, he would have done like Olénin, the hero of “The Cossacks,”

or like Tolstoï, who is himself represented under that name. He would

have torn himself from his habits; he would have started for the Far

East: he would have been certain to find there enough new impressions

to refresh his weary brain; enough manly occupations or vivifying

pleasures to strengthen his nerves, and build up his muscles; enough

perils and accidents or proofs of every kind to regenerate his soul,

purify it from the tares of vice, and again raise the wheat of more

than one virtue.

Tolstoï was not the first of these superficially blasé emigrants who

went off to Asia to find a powerful diversion from irksomeness, from

the disgust of an idle and disorderly existence. Pushkin had pointed

out the road for him; and the author of “The Gypsies” had himself

followed the traces already marked through the desert by the _britchka_

which carried Griboyédof, and the ox-cart which brought him back.[49]

“On the high river bank,” says Pushkin, “I saw before me the fortress

of Herhera. Three torrents, with roar and foam, come tumbling down

the banks. I had just crossed the river. Two oxen, hitched to an

_arba_, were climbing the steep road. A few Georgians accompanied

the _arba_. ‘Where from?’ I asked them. ‘From Teheran.’--‘What are

you carrying?’--‘Griboyéd.’ It was the body of the assassinated

Griboyédof, which they were taking back to Tiflis.”

More fortunate than Griboyédof, Tolstoï will come back alive, and,

like Pushkin, will be able to describe this adventurous existence;

but he will describe it without embellishments, above all without

exalting it. He will let the people whom he finds there, and whom he

studies entirely at his leisure, appear in all the bold relief of their

natures. He will not take away the strange grace and the perfume of the

wildflower from this nature in which he feels a voluptuous delight.

The evolution of the romance is rapid and fascinating. We are at

Moscow. The night is done. The busy city is waking little by little.

The indolent youth are finishing their evenings. At the Hotel

Chevallier a light, the presence of which is against the rules, filters

through the blinds. A carriage, sledges, and a travelling _troïka_, are

before the door, near which the porter, muffled in his _shuba_, and a

grumbling lackey with pale, drawn features, are waiting.

In the dining-room three young men are finishing a farewell supper.

One of them, in short _shuba_, strides up and down the room, cracking

almonds in his strong, thick, but well-cared-for hands. At first glance

we feel moved by sympathy for him: there is such an expression of life

in his smile, in his heated cheeks, in his brilliant eyes, in his fiery

gestures, and in his animated voice. He is off for the Caucasus, in the

capacity of _yunker_.[50]

Olénin found himself, without family and without curb, at the head

of a great fortune, which at twenty-four he has already half wasted.

The dominant trait of his character is scorn for all authority. Yet

he remains capable of every impulse, even of the most generous. He

has experimented with social relations, with service of the State,

with farming occupations, with music, with love. He feels that he is

_blasé_, but he believes that he is capable of beginning life anew. He

is not one of those men “who, born for the bridle, put it on once, and

never take it off till the day of their death.” He has the spirit and

the vivacity which impel him to pick up and cast far from him all the

weight of servitude.

After having followed a whole net-work of unknown and obscure streets,

after having felt a softening of the heart during this drive, not about

his friends, not about his mistresses, but about himself, as though

his tears were homage rendered to all that he felt that was still good

and beautiful and strong and hopeful in him, Olénin suddenly finds

himself before the wide, snow-bound plain. He turns his mind to the

past. He thinks about his farming, about his debts, about his follies;

and he comes to the conclusion that he is, “in spite of all, a very,

very clever young man.” Having made the first relay, he endeavors to

bring about equilibrium in his budget, so as to pay up his creditors

in the briefest possible time; and, his conscience being now eased, he

falls asleep. He dreams of Circassian beauties, of battles, of glory,

of passionate love, of some wild beauty tamed, civilized, and freed

by his hand. His tailor Capelli, whom he owes nearly seven hundred

rubles, comes across this gilded dream, which is rudely interrupted by

the second relay. His journey is broken or filled only by these halts,

by tea served at the station, by watching the rumps of the horses, by

a few words with his valet Vanya, by a certain number of indefinite

dreams, and, most of all, by the nights of sound sleep, such as is

granted to youth alone.

According as Olénin advances towards the Caucasus, calm takes

possession of his soul. The evidences of civilization which he sees on

the route are a trial to him. At Stavropol he is disagreeably impressed

to find fashionable attire, cabs, and round hats. But as soon as he

is beyond the city the country assumes and retains a wild and warlike

character. In the territory of the Don the air becomes already so mild

that he has to ride without his furs. Nothing is so delightful as this

unexpected spring. But here is something better: danger begins. At any

moment they may be attacked by bandits. Then the mountains rise on the

horizon. The first impression, at twilight, and from the distance, and

through the clouds, is disappointing; but the next morning at early

dawn, in the clearness of the sky, they take a new and superb aspect.

“From this moment, all that he saw, all that he thought, all that he

felt, took on the new and sternly majestic character of the mountains.

All his recollections of Moscow, his shame and his regret, all his idle

dreams about the Caucasus, departed, never to return.”

It is on the banks of the Terek that Olénin is going to dwell, to

struggle, to love, to hate,--in a word, to live,--for a number of

seasons. It is this river, therefore, that Tolstoï begins to describe

for us, with its heaps of grayish sand, and its border of reeds on the

right bank, with its low, steep left bank, gullied and crowned with

oaks or “rotten plane-trees.” On the right are the villages of the

Tcherkes, on the left the _stanitsas_ (stations) of the Kazaki. “In old

times the majority of these _stanitsas_ were on the very bank; but the

Terek, moving annually north of the mountain, has washed them away, and

now only the traces can be seen of thickly-overgrown ancient ruins,

abandoned gardens, pear-trees, lindens, and poplars, woven together

with mulberries and wild vines. No one dwells there now; and on the

sand only the tracks of stags, wolves, hares, and pheasants, which love

these places, can be seen.”

A delicious impression of buoyant air and joyous light fills Olénin’s

heart as soon as he sets foot in the Novomlinskaïa _stanitsa_, in the

midst of the Kazak tribe of Grebna. His arrival in the clear twilight,

when the whitish mass of the mountains stood out distinctly against

the brilliant rays of the setting sun, is described with a vivacity of

coloring which deliciously translates emotions never to be forgotten.

“Young girls in tucked-up petticoats, with switches in their hands,

ran, merrily chattering, to meet the cattle hurrying home in a cloud of

dust and gnats from the steppe. The satiated cows and buffaloes scatter

through the streets, followed by the Kazak children in their variegated

Tatar tunics. Their loud conversation, merry bursts of laughter, and

shouts are commingled with the lowing of the cattle. Here an armed

Kazak on horseback, having leave of absence from his outpost, rides up

to a cottage, and, leaning down from his horse, raps at the window; and

in a moment the pretty young head of the Kazak girl appears, and one

hears their gay, affectionate talk. Here comes a ragged, high-cheeked

Nogai laborer back with reeds from the steppe. He turns his creaking

_arba_ into the captain’s broad, clean _dvor_, and throws off the

yokes from the shaking heads of the oxen, and talks in Tatar with the

_esaul_. Around the puddle which fills nearly the whole street, and by

which people, all these years, have forced their way, crowding against

the fence, a bare-legged Kazak girl is picking her way, bending under

a bundle of fagots, and lifting her skirt high above her white ankles;

and a Kazak horseman, returning from the chase, laughingly shouts out,

‘Lift it higher, wench!’ and he aims at her. The Kazak girl drops her

skirt, throws down her wood. An old Kazak, with turned-up trousers and

bare gray breast, on his way home from fishing, carries his silvery

fish, still flopping in the net, and, in order to take a shorter path,

crawls through his neighbor’s broken hedge, and tears a rent in his

coat on the thorns. Here comes an old woman dragging a dry branch, and

the blows of an axe are heard around the corner. Kazak children shout

as they whip their tops wherever there are level places in the streets;

women crawl through the fences so as to save going round. The pungent

smoke of burning dung rises from all the chimneys. In every _dvor_ is

heard the sound of the increased bustle that precedes the silence of

the night.”

Amid these new faces, there is one whom Olénin catches a glimpse of the

very first thing: it is the girl to whom he is going to lose his heart.

How she comes upon the scene, this wild young maiden, with her noble

features, her statuesque form, her gloomy and burning eyes, with her

red lips, her golden complexion, her supple and nervous muscles, her

turbulent blood, her savage heart! She comes in with her cattle, which

break their way through the open wicket, following a huge buffalo-cow

driven wild by the gnats of the steppe. “Marianka’s face is half

concealed by a kerchief tied round her head: she wears a pink shirt,

and a green _beshmet_, or petticoat.” She hides under the pent-house

of the _dvor_; and her voice is heard as she gently wheedles the

buffalo-cow, which she is about to milk: “Now stand still! Here now!

Come now, _mátushka_!” How could Olénin escape the impression of “the

tall and stately figure, ... her strong and virginal form, outlined by

the thin calico shirt,” of those beautiful black eyes, which at first

will shun him, but which later will gaze at him “with childish fright

and savage curiosity.” Love will be born all the more easily from the

fact that Marianka is the daughter of the people with whom Olénin is

quartered, and that he will find her in his path at every step.

But this feeling is not destined to be met with return. If Marianka

is Olénin’s ideal of maidenly beauty, this civilized Russian cannot

arouse in the young girl’s heart any feeling of admiration, and, in

consequence, no love. He is not ill-favored, or a weakling, or foolish,

stupid, or cowardly; but he has not the triumphant beauty, or the

marvellous vigor, or the ever-watchful shrewdness, or the pitiless

courage, of the young Kazak, Lukashka. What woman would not love the

latter? He is so tall and so well shaped; he wears his soldier’s rig

so proudly, his torn kaftan, his woollen cap knocked in behind; he has

such elegant weapons, and such unrivalled skill in the use of them!

There is nothing sweet, nothing tender about him; but the ardor and the

life of all the passions show on his face, with its black brows, with

its falcon eyes, with teeth of dazzling whiteness. He appears to us for

the first time at the Kazak post, near the Terek. His great hands are

laying snares and traps for the pheasants, and he is whistling. His

comrade (Nazarka), brings him a live pheasant, not daring to kill it.

“‘Give it here!’ Lukashka took a small knife from under his dagger, and

quickly cut the pheasant’s throat. The bird struggled, but did not have

time to spread its wings before its bleeding head bent over and fell.”

Whatever character Tolstoï gave these young figures of Marianka and

Lukashka, he does not find that they express all that ideal of strength

and power with which at this time infatuated. Accordingly he calls

up the image of a more striking savagery, in the person of the old

Yeroshka, the colossal huntsman with his voice of thunder, his animal

habits, his ogre-like appetites, and his childlike character. “Over

his shoulders was thrown a ragged woven _zipún_, and his feet were

shod in buck-skin _porshni_, or sandals, fastened by cords, which were

twisted about his legs. On his head was a rumpled white fur cap. On

his back, over one shoulder, he carried a _kobuilka_ [an instrument to

catch pheasants], and a sack with pullets and dried meat, to bring back

the falcon; over the other shoulder a dead wild-cat was swinging by a

strap; behind him, fastened to his belt, were a bag containing bullets,

powder, and bread, a horse-tail for keeping off the gnats, a big dagger

in a torn sheath, stained with blood, and two dead pheasants. This

giant has, for distinctive traits, the discreet and silent way in which

he walks in his soft sandals, and the odor which he exhales, “a strong,

but not unpleasant odor mingled of fresh wine, of vodka, of powder,

and of dried blood.” He has an inexhaustible fund of anecdotes, about

his past life, his hunting, his exploits, his horse-thefts. Yet he is

only a child, compared to what his father was, who carried on his back

a four-hundred-pound wild boar, and drank at a draught two buckets of

vodka. He likes to repeat this saw of a Western man, whom he knew: “We

shall all die, the grass will grow on our grave, and that is all.”

He is stout and hearty for his seventy years, although a witch had

ruined him a little with her spell. On the chase, in the woods, he

does not cease to whisper, God knows what mysterious monologue. When

he returns, if he finds some host at whose table he can sit, and if he

can only have wine furnished according to the measure of his thirst,

he gets drunk, until he falls stiff on the floor. Hunting scenes,

scenes of love, scenes of ambuscade or of combat, go to make up almost

exclusively the matter of all this work. But all these scenes are so

variously true, and so profoundly the result of experience, that the

romantic thread designed to connect them seems almost needless. What

reader, however, would have the courage to disengage it? I should like,

for my part, to give by way of analysis, and by short quotations, an

idea of the most powerful scenes here pictured. I will present them in

the order in which they come.

Here we are in ambush, on the banks of the river: “They were hourly

expecting the Abreks--as the hostile Tchetchens were called--to cross

and attack them, from the Tatar side, especially during the month of

May, when the woods along the Terek are so dense, that a man on foot

has difficulty in breaking through, and when the river is so low that

it can in many places be forded.” The Kazak Lukashka is gazing at the

sky, with its flashing of heat lightning. He spreads down his kaftan at

the foot of the reeds. “Occasionally the reeds, without any apparent

reason, would all begin to wave and to whisper to each other. From

below, the waving feathers of the sedge looked like the downy branches

of trees, against the bright background of the sky.” He listens to

all the noises of the night, the murmur of the reeds, the snoring of

the three Kazaks who have come with him to keep his secret guard, the

buzzing of the gnats, and the rippling of the water, from time to time

a far-off shot, the fall of a part of the bank washed away, the splash

of some big fish, the crashing of the underbrush as some animal forced

its way through. “Once an owl, slowly flapping its wings, flew down the

Terek; over the heads of the Kazaks, it turned and flew towards the

forest, with faster flapping wings, and then fluttering settled down in

the branches of an old _tchinar_ (plane tree). At every such unusual

sound the young Kazak pricked up his ears eagerly, snapped his eyes,

and slowly examined his gun.”

Suddenly (it is now almost daybreak) a log with a dry branch floating

in the river attracts his attention. He immediately notices that

the log, instead of going according to the will of the current, and

floating down stream, is crossing the river. Here follows several

minutes of strange excitement: the whole inner drama which is enacting

in this young savage’s soul is expressed with so much truth and force,

that you come to follow with him the voice of the ferocious instinct

which controls him. He puts his gun to his shoulder and waits, while

his heart is violently beating at the thought that he may miss his

human game; finally he draws a long breath and shoots, muttering,

according to the Kazak custom, the “In the name of the Father and the

Son.” The tree trunk, rocking and rolling over and over, swiftly floats

down the stream, freed from the weight which it carried.

And when the Kazaks come hurrying down, both on foot and on

horseback (the first thing, in case of a surprise, was to send for

re-enforcements), what a scene is that where the lucky marksman plunges

into the water to go and bring his fish from the sandbank, and flings

the corpse on the bank “like a carp”! What barbarous coloring in the

exclamations of the spectators! “How yellow he is!” says one. “He was

evidently one of their best _jigits_,” says Lukashka: “his beard is

dyed and trimmed.” While they are on the spot, the chief claims the

_jigit’s_ gun, one Kazak buys the kaftan for a ruble, another promises

two gallons of vodka for the dagger.

But the marvellous fragment of this broad, animated, boldly lighted

canvas is this group, this contrast between the living man triumphant

in his nakedness, and the corpse lying on the ground, naked also,

but rigid and terrible to see under the strange coloration and the

disconcerting expression of death. “The cinnamon colored body, with

nothing on but wet, dark-blue cotton drawers, girdled tightly about

the fallen belly, was handsome and well built; the muscular arms lay

stiffly along the sides; the livid, freshly shaven round head, with

the clotted wound on one side, was thrown back; the smooth sunburned

forehead made a sharp contrast with the shaven head; the glassy eyes

were still open, showing their pupils, and seemed to look up beyond

them all; a good-natured and shrewd smile seemed to hover on the thin

and half-open lips under the reddish, half-cut mustache. The small

bony hands were covered with hair; the fingers were clinched, and the

nails had a red tinge. Lukashka was not yet dressed; he was still wet;

his neck was redder, and his eyes were brighter, than usual; his broad

cheeks trembled; and from his white and healthy body there seemed to

rise into the cool morning air a visible vapor.”

As a reward for this expedition, the Kazaks who took part in it are

permitted to go and spend the day at the village. The victorious

Lukashka steps up to Marianka with the same feeling of faith in his

strength and in his skill as he had had the evening before while

lying in wait for the enemy. He asks her for some of the sunflower

seeds which she has; she offers him her apron. He comes close to her,

and whispers a request of her: she replies, “I shall not go! I have

said so.” He follows her by the house, and there he urges her to love

him. She laughs, and sends him off to his married mistress. He cries,

“Suppose I have a sweetheart, the Devil take her.” She does not reply,

but breaks the switch which she has in her hands. At last, “I will

marry certainly, but don’t expect me to commit any follies for you,

never!” He tenderly woos her. She leans against him, kisses him on the

lips, calls him a sweet name, and, after pressing him warmly to her,

suddenly tears herself from his arms and runs away. “You will marry,”

he says to himself, “but the only thing that I want is that you love

me!” He went off to find Nazarka at Yamka’s; “and, after drinking a

while with him, he went to Duniashka’s, where he spent the night.”

In this struggle for existence, and in this battle for the possession

of the beauty whom both love, why should not Olénin be worsted

by Lukashka? The principal obstacle to the triumph of the son of

civilization comes from I his intellectual advantages and from his

moral perfection. Do the best he can, he can never get rid of all

his prejudices. He will be able only to approach that barbaric ideal

which his rival without effort realizes by his natural gifts. In

Marianka’s eyes he could have only borrowed virtues, only the graces of

a plagiarist.

Olénin cannot change his nature by changing his habits; still more he

cannot succeed by formulating a theory of life, in conforming to it in

all respects the practical facts of existence. The contradictions which

result from this conflict between the past and the present, between

long-settled ideas and present convictions, is strongly brought out by

Tolstoï in many passages in the novel. Here is one example: The first

time that the young Russian goes alone pheasant-hunting, he gets tired,

and lies down on the ground in the midst of the forest. Myriads of

gnats settle down upon him. The torment of it nettles him, discourages

him. He is on the point of retracing his steps; an effort of the will

keeps him where he is. Finally the feeling of pain is diminished, and

at length it seems to him almost agreeable. “It even seemed to him that

if this atmosphere of gnats surrounding him on all sides, this paste

of gnats which rolled up under his hand when he wiped his sweaty face,

and this itching over his whole body were missing, the forest would

have lost for him its wild character and its charm.”

From this reflection he passes to others; and, lying “in the old stag’s

bed,” he thinks about his whole surrounding,--the trees, the wild vine,

the frightened pheasants, the complaining jackals, the gnats buzzing

and dancing amid the leaves. “About me, flying among the leaves, which

seem to them immense islands, the gnats are dancing in the air and

humming,--one, two, three, four, a hundred, a thousand, a million

gnats; and all these, for some reason or other, are buzzing around me,

and each one of them is just as much a separate existence from all

the rest as I am.” It began to seem clear to him what the gnats said

in their humming. “Here, here, children, here is some one to eat,”

they sing, and settle down upon him. And now this taught him that he

was not a Russian nobleman, a person in Moscow society, a friend or a

relative to this and that person. It came to him that he was just a

mere gnat, a mere pheasant, a mere stag, like those around him. The

conclusion which he draws from this is quite different from what would

be expected. Instead of saying, “Let us struggle like these beings, and

like them let us live to triumph, or let us triumph to live,” Olénin

throws himself down on his knees, and beseeches God to let him live

to accomplish some great deed of devotion; for “happiness,” he says,

“consists in living for others.”

What did Tolstoï mean to insinuate? That Olénin was illogical, or that

he lacked sincerity? It will be enough for him to find himself in

Marianka’s presence to forget his vow, and to sacrifice his morals to

his instincts.

How much happier the Kazak Lukashka is in having only instincts, and

in not entangling them, in not fastening them down in this bird-lime

of moral considerations! This is what Tolstoï seems to have wished to

be understood in a marvellous scene, an analysis of which cannot give

either the bold design or the sombre coloring or the proportions worthy

of an epos. It is the wholly Homeric parley about the ransom of the

corpse. The brother of the dead man and his murderer are face to face:

the former tall, stalwart, with reddish trimmed beard, with an air of

royalty under his ragged kaftan, honoring no one with a glance, not

even looking at the corpse, and sitting on his crossed legs, with a

short pipe in his mouth, doing nothing except occasionally giving an

order in a guttural voice to his companion the interpreter; the latter

with difficulty restraining the exultation into which he is thrown by

the promise which has just been made of giving him the cross, and,

in spite of his face reddened with pleasure, striving to preserve an

impassive attitude, and whittling a stick of wood, out of which he will

make a ramrod.

The Tchetchenets has merely asked, as he takes his departure, where

the murderer is; and the interpreter points out Lukashka. “The

Tchetchenets looked at him for a moment, and then, slowly turning away,

fixed his eyes on the other bank. His eyes expressed, not hatred, but

cold disdain.” They get into the boat; they rapidly push through the

stream. Horsemen are waiting for them; they put the dead body across

a saddle on a horse, which shies. Lukashka is told what a curt threat

the Tchetchenets made as he went away. “You have killed us, but we will

crush you.” Lukashka bursts out laughing. “Why do you laugh?” asked

Olénin. “If they had killed your brother, would you be glad?” The Kazak

looked at Olénin, and laughed. He seemed to have comprehended his idea,

but he was above all prejudice. “Well, now, mayn’t that happen? Isn’t

this necessary? Haven’t they sometimes killed some of our men?”

The time passes. Instead of drinking, of playing cards, of flirting

with the Kazak women, of all the time calculating his chances of

promotion, like the majority of the Russian _yunkers_ in the Caucasus,

Olénin plunges into the solitudes of the woods, and gathers indelible

impressions. His love for Marianka has imperceptibly developed until it

presents all the phenomena of a genuine passion. He has even blurted

out a few hints of his affection, which a strange timidity or a scruple

of candor keeps him from putting into more direct form; but at night

he comes to the door of the room where the young girl is sleeping, in

order to listen to her breathing.[51] What shall he do? To take her

for his mistress would be “horrible; it would be murder.” To marry her

would be worse.

“Ah! if I could become a Kazak like Lukashka, could steal horses, could

drink _tchikhir_ wine, could sing songs, shoot people, creep under her

window at night when drunk, without any thought of what I am, or why

I exist, that would be another matter. Then we might understand each

other; then I might be happy.... What is the most terrible and the

most delightful thing in my position is the feeling that I understand

her, and that she will never understand me. It is not because she is

below me that she does not understand me: no, she could not possibly

understand me. She is happy. She, like nature itself, is beautiful,

calm, and absolutely self-contained.” What is to be done, then? Give

her up? Sacrifice himself? What folly! Live for others? Why? It is the

fate of men to love only the _ego_; that is to say, in this case, to

conquer Marianka, “and live her life.” Olénin then makes himself drunk

like a Kazak; and, in the madness of intoxication, he offers to marry

the young girl. She perceives clearly that that is only the wine that

speaks: she drives the wooer away, and escapes him.

Yet she feels somewhat moved in consequence of this offer; and on the

day of the _stanitsa_ festival she is rude to Lukashka, though she has

already become his acknowledged “bride.” But a tragic event is about

to bring forth abundantly the feeling which fills this young soul to

overflowing. All Marianka’s deep love for Lukashka will suddenly gleam

out with unexpected brilliancy, like the gloomy sheet of the Terek in

the flashes of the storm.

The Kazaks have started out on an expedition against the Abreks.

Olénin follows the band which is directed, but not commanded, by

Lukashka. The engagement takes place. The Abreks are sitting in a swamp

at the foot of a hillock of sand. The Kazaks approach them behind a

cart loaded with hay. At first they do not reply to the enemy’s shots.

They wait till they are within five paces from the Abreks, then they

rush upon them. Olénin joins them. “Horror came over his eyes. He

did not see any thing distinctly, but perceived that all was over.

Lukashka, white as a sheet, had caught a wounded Tchetchenets, and was

crying, ‘Do not kill him. I will take him alive.’ The Tchetchenets

was the red-bearded Abrek, the brother of the one whom he had killed,

he who had come to ransom his body. Lukashka was twisting his arms.

Suddenly the Tchetchenets tore himself away, and his pistol went off.

Lukashka fell. Blood showed on his abdomen. He leaped to his feet,

but fell back again, swearing in Russian and Tatar. Still more blood

appeared on him and under him. The Kazaks hurried up to him, and

began to loosen his belt. One of them--it was Nazarka--for some time

before coming to him could not sheathe his _shashka_. The blade of the

_shashka_ was covered with blood.”

“When Olénin came back to Marianka, and wanted to speak of his love for

her, he found her grieving. She looked at him silently and defiantly.

“Olénin said, ‘Mariana, I have come.’...

“‘Stop,’ she said. Her face did not change in the least, but the tears

poured from her eyes.

“‘What is the matter? What are you crying for?’

“‘Why?’ she repeated in a hoarse, deep voice. ‘They have been killing

Kazaks, and that’s what the matter is!’

“‘Lukashka?’ asked Olénin.

“‘Go away. I don’t want to see you.’

“‘Mariana,’ said Olénin, coming nearer to her.

“‘You will never get any thing from me!”

“‘Mariana, don’t say so!’

“‘Go away, you hateful man!’ cried the young girl, stamping angrily,

and starting towards him with a threatening gesture. Such anger, scorn,

hatred, were expressed in her face that Olénin instantly saw that he

had nothing more to hope for.”

He therefore goes away. The scene of his farewell with the old uncle

Yeroshka has that exquisite pathos where smiles are mingled with

tears. As a friendly gift at this solemn moment of separation, the old

Kazak gives the young Russian some advice which will save his life in

battles. He casts ridicule on the customs of the orthodox soldiers.

“When you have to go into battle, or everywhere,--I am an old wolf,

you see, who has seen every thing,--when they fire at you, don’t go

into a crowd where there are many men. You see, when your fellows are a

bit afraid, they all crowd together; and though it’s more sociable in

a crowd, it is more dangerous, because a crowd gives a good mark....

I say sometimes, when I look at your soldiers, “I wonder at ’em. How

stupid! They go straight on, all in a mass; and, what is worse, they

wear red. How can they help getting killed?” And he breaks into tears

as he kisses this young, “ever-wandering fool;” but he manages to

extort from him a gun, to keep as a remembrance of him.

“Olénin looked round. Dyadya Yeroshka and Marianka were talking,

evidently about their own affairs; and neither the old Kazak nor the

young girl were looking at him.” (With these simple but pathetic words,

the story ends.)

The great masters of Russian literature in the nineteenth century · 第 35 / 49 题