Dafydd ab Edmwnd

The commanding figure in this period is, of course, Dafydd ab Edmwnd,

who was a disciple of Meredydd ap Rhys. He bears somewhat the same

relation to his contemporaries as Dafydd ab Gwilym does to his, and to

strain an analogy, we might say that as Dryden was to Milton, so Dafydd

ab Edmwnd was to Dafydd ab Gwilym. He was regarded by his contemporaries

as the greatest poet that North Wales had ever produced, and some would

set him up as a rival even to Dafydd ab Gwilym himself. He would

probably have produced much greater poetry had he understood that the

cywydd and the other metres were strait and shackled enough without the

_cymeriadau_ and other devices which he introduced, or at least

sanctioned and made popular. He begins many of his cywyddau and odes

with the same letter; he is the chief among Welsh formalists, but in

spite of his self-imposed restrictions he is a great poet also. His most

famous poems are three _Cywyddau Merch_ or "Poems to a Lady," and his

_Cywydd i Wallt Merch_, "cywydd to a lady's hair." He is the author of

the lines already quoted: "thy brow," he sings, "is as the snow of

yesternight, and thy cheeks like a shower of roses." He died about 1480.

Dafydd ab Edmwnd's disciples were Gutyn Owain and Tudur Aled, who was

also his nephew. Gutyn Owain lived between 1420 and 1500, and was one of

the men appointed by the king's commissioners to trace, or perhaps to

manufacture, the Welsh pedigree of Henry VII. He belonged entirely to

the school inaugurated by Dafydd ab Edmwnd, and though he was by no

means wanting in imagination, the highest distinction of his verse is

its intricacy of form and very often the felicity of his couplets.

Just as the rise of Owen Glyndwr in the beginning of the century had

given a new impulse and a new interest to poetry, so in 1485, when Henry

VII.--the "little bull" as he is called by the poets--ascended the

throne of England, a particular kind of poetry called _brud_, half

history and half prophecy, became popular, and we have in the

manuscripts much writing of this description, a good deal of it

worthless as poetry. Occasionally, however, some of these "bruts" may

claim to be called poetry, especially the compositions of Robin Ddu o

Fon, who wrote poems in praise of the Tudors and hailed them as the

deliverers of the nation, even before Henry VII. had landed in England,

and Dafydd Llwyd ab Llywelyn, whose works deserve to be much better

known than they are at present. One of the best cywyddau among his works

is the "Address to the Raven," to whom he promises a right royal feast

when the hero whom all Wales is expecting has met his royal enemy. Tudur

Aled, too, was a zealous partisan of Henry VII. and wrote many cywyddau

in praise of Sir Rhys ap Thomas, the great champion of Henry's cause in

South Wales. He is also famous as having supplemented and made a new

recension of Dafydd ab Edmwnd's rules of poetry in the eisteddfod held

at Caerwys in 1524. Tudur Aled has always been more widely known in

Wales than almost any other of the earlier poets except Dafydd ab

Gwilym. This is perhaps due to the quotability and sententiousness of

his couplets. There is a certain refreshing dryness about his poetry

which partly makes up for his want of imagination. One of the most

interesting poets of this century is Lewis Glyn Cothi, who lived between

1410 and 1490. During the Wars of the Roses he was a zealous

Lancastrian, and his bitterest enemies were the men of Chester, who had

treated him scurvily while he was there in hiding, and his _awdl_,

satirizing the men of that city, is one of the most vigorous

compositions in the language. Indeed, among so many _cywyddau_ of this

period in conventional praise of different patrons, it is most

refreshing to find such an outburst of sincere personal feeling, boldly

and fiercely expressed. He wrote an _awdl_ also rejoicing in the victory

of Henry VII. Most of his work, however, consists of _cywyddau

mawl_--praise of patrons--containing weary and unpoetical pedigrees.

Gruffydd Hiraethog, who flourished about 1540, was a disciple of Tudur

Aled. A fierce poetical dispute raged between him and Sion Brwynog of

Anglesey, who was a contemporary of his. About this time there were many

poets in Wales who were imitators of Dafydd ab Gwilym, and who did not

follow implicitly the lead of Dafydd ab Edmwnd, like those whom we have

mentioned. Much of their poetry is feeble, but Bedo Brwynllysg

especially stands out from among the rest, and his poetry, though highly

imitative and often over fanciful, is of a much higher order than the

genealogical poems of Lewis Glyn Cothi and others. In the same way the

only poem of any merit of Ieuan Denlwyn printed in the _Gorchestion_ is

written in this imitative strain. Other poets of the middle of this

period are Deio ap Ieuan Du, Iorwerth Fynglwyd, Lewys Morganwg, Ieuan

Brydydd Hir, and Tudur Penllyn, who wrote a superb _cywydd_ to Dafydd ab

Siencyn, the outlaw.

Towards the end of the period we begin to breathe a literary atmosphere

that is gradually but surely changing,--it is the change from the misty

Wales of Roman Catholic times to the modern Wales after the Reformation.

The poetical incoherencies of the old metres and the tricks of fancy of

the old stylists occasionally form a somewhat incongruous dress for the

thoughts of later poets. The old spirit and the glamour were gradually

wearing away, only to be momentarily revived in the poetry of Goronwy

Owen, nearly two centuries later. Two or three figures, indeed, stand

out prominently during these years, among whom are some of the bards

ordained _penceirddiaid_ (master-poets) in the second Caerwys Eisteddfod

held in 1568, viz. William Llyn, William Cynwal, Sion Tudur, and Sion

Phylip. William Llyn (1530?-1580) was a pupil of Gruffydd Hiraethog. His

complicated _awdlau_ are marvels of ingenuity, but many of them are on

that very account almost unintelligible. He was, however, a complete

master of the _cywydd_, in which he sometimes displays a sense of style

and a sweetness of imagery allied to a melodiousness of language

unequalled by the other poets of the period. His best-known work is the

famous _marwnad_ to his master, Gruffydd Hiraethog. Sion Tudur (d.

1602), also a disciple of G. Hiraethog, was connected in some capacity

or other with the cathedral at St Asaph. He is a realist, and delights

in giving vivid word pictures in a less fanciful strain than his

predecessors. Sion Phylip (1543-1620) wrote a famous _marwnad_ to his

father and a _cywydd_ "to a sea-gull," which is a superb piece of

nature-painting in the style of Dafydd ab Gwilym. While dealing with

this second Eisteddfod at Caerwys, we may note that Simwnt Fychan's

"Laws of Poetry" were accepted at this festival.

Two poets of this period, whom an English writer describes as "the two

filthy Welshmen who first smoked publicly in the streets," were captains

in Queen Elizabeth's navy, viz. Thomas Prys (d. 1634) of Plas Iolyn, and

William Myddleton (1556-1621), called in Welsh Gwilym Canoldref. The

former wrote, among other things, humorous _cywyddau_ descriptive of

life in London and in the English navy of those days, in a style which

was afterwards attempted by Lewys Morys. The work of Myddleton, by

which he is best known, is his translation of the Psalms (1603) into

Welsh _cywydd_ metre, a difficult and profitless experiment.

With Edmwnd Prys (1541-1624), the famous archdeacon of Merioneth, we

come to distinctly modern times. He is hardly a great poet, if we judge

him by the canons which are now popular. His gift was a gift of terse

and biting statement, and his _cywyddau_ on the whole have more of

literary than of poetical merit. He was a man of vast learning, and his

works are full of scholastic and often difficult allusions. His most

famous _cywyddau_ are those written in the literary quarrel between him

and Wiliam Cynwal. "Wiliam Cynwal," says Goronwy Owen, "though the

greater poet, was like a man fighting with bare fists against complete

armour," and it may be freely granted that in this, the most famous

quarrel in Welsh literature, the palm of victory rested with the

contentious old ecclesiastic. We shall deal with the rest of Edmwnd

Prys's literary work in the section on the rise of popular poetry.

Here the age of the _cywydd_ and the _awdl_, as the chief forms of

verse, ends. They appear again in the succeeding centuries, but as

aliens among a nation that no longer paid them homage. The distinctly

Welsh fashion in song was dying out.

6. _Prose, 1550-1750._--One of the most striking features of Welsh

literature is the almost entire absence of prose between 1300 and 1550.

The genius of the people has always been an eminently poetical and

imaginative one, and the history of Wales, politically and socially, has

always been a fitter subject for poetry than for prose. During this

period, Wales enjoyed a rest from propagandists and revolutionaries

which has seldom been the happy lot of any other nation--they lay

content with their own old traditions, acquiescing proudly in their

separation from the other nations of Europe, and in their aloofness from

all the movements which shook England and the continent during those

years. Dynasties came and went, one religion ousted another religion, a

new learning exposed the absurdities of the old, but the Welsh, among

their hills, knew nothing of it; and when new ideas began to brood over

the consciousness of the nation, they never got beyond the stage of

providing new subjects for _cywyddau_. The Peasant Revolt, for instance,

had but little effect on Welsh history, its most important contribution

to the heritage of the nation being Iolo Goch's superb "_Cywydd_ to the

Labourer." Even the Reformation, which helped to change the whole fabric

of English literature, had little effect on that of Wales, and the age

of the _cywydd_ dragged out wearily its last years without experiencing

the slightest quickening from the great movement which was remaking

Europe. Hardly a prophet or reactionary raised his voice in defence or

condemnation, and the Welsh went on serenely making and reading poetry.

The two political movements in which Wales was really interested, the

revolt of Glyndwr and the accession of Henry VII., paid their tribute to

its poetry alone, and both enterprises had sufficient of romance in them

to repel the historian and to capture the poet. Naturally, therefore, we

have no prose in this period, because there was no cause strong enough

to produce it. What prose the nation required they found in the tales of

romance, in the legends of Arthur and Charlemagne and the Grail, and, as

for pedigrees and history, were they not written in the _cywyddau_ of

the poets?

The little prose that was produced during this period (1300-1550) was of

an extraordinary kind. It was simply an exercise in long sentences and

in curiously built compounds, and therefore more nearly allied to

poetry. It generally took the form of _dewisbethau_, a list of the

"choice things" of such and such a person, or of the later triads

(_trioedd_), which, starting from an ancient nucleus, gradually grew

till, at the present day, Wales has a gnomic literature out of all

proportion to the rest of its prose. Modern Welsh prose, however, is

only very indirectly connected with these compositions. It is almost

altogether a product of the Biblical literature which began to appear

after the Reformation, and we shall proceed to give here the main facts

and dates in its development. The first Welsh book was printed in 1546.

It consisted of extracts in Welsh from the Bible and the Prayer Book,

and a calendar. The author was Sir John Prys (1502-1555). The most

important name in the early part of this period is William Salesbury

(1520?-1600?). His chief books were, _A Dictionary in Englyshe and

Welshe_ (printed in 1547, and published in facsimile reprint by the

Cymmrodorion Society), _Kynniver Llith a Ban_ (1551), the Prayer Book in

Welsh (1567), and the most important of all his works, the translation

of the New Testament (1567). It is difficult to form any estimate, at

this distance of time, of the impetus which William Salesbury gave to

Welsh prose, but it must be regretfully admitted that his great work was

marred by many defects. He had a theory that Welsh ought to be written

as much like Latin as possible, and the result is that his language is

very poor Welsh, both in spelling and idiom; it is an artificial

dialect. It is a striking testimony, however, to his influence that many

of the constructions and words which he manufactured are found to this

day in correct literary Welsh.

In 1567 was published a _Welsh Grammar_ by Dr Gruffydd Roberts, a Roman

Catholic priest living at Milan (reprinted in facsimile, Paris, 1883),

and in 1583, under the direction of Dr Rhosier Smyth, his _Drych

Cristionogawl_ was published at Rouen. Many other important Welsh books

were produced during these years, but the work which may be regarded as

having the greatest influence on the subsequent literature of Wales was

the translation of the _Welsh Bible_ (1588) by Dr William Morgan

(1547?-1604), bishop of Llandaff, and afterwards of St Asaph. The

Authorized Version (1620) now in use is a revision of this work by Dr

Richard Parry, bishop of St Asaph (1560-1623). In 1592 the _Welsh

Grammar_ of Sion Dafydd Rhys (1534-1609) was published--a most valuable

treatise on the language and on the rules of Welsh poetry. It was

followed in 1621 by the _Welsh Grammar_, and in 1632 by the _Welsh

Dictionary_ of Dr John Davies o Fallwyd (1570?-1644).

There are two prose compositions which stand entirely by themselves in

this period of Bibles and grammars--the _History_ of Ellis Gruffydd, and

Morris Kyffin's _Deffyniad y Ffydd_. The former was a soldier in the

English army during the reign of Queen Elizabeth, and wrote a long

history of England from the earliest times to his own day. This

document, which has never been published, and which lies hidden away

among the Mostyn MSS., is a most important and valuable original

contribution to the history of the author's contemporaries, and it sheds

considerable light on the inner life of the court and the army. It is

written in a delightfully easy style, contrasting favourably with the

stiff diction of this period of translations. The work of Morris Kyffin

(1555?-1598?) which we have mentioned is a translation of Bishop Jewel's

_Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae_ (1562) and was published in 1595. This

work is the first piece of modern Welsh prose within reach of the

ordinary reader, written in the rich idiom of the spoken Welsh. It is a

precursor of many other books of its kind, a long series culminating in

the immortal _Bardd Cwsc_. In this sense Morris Kyffin may with perfect

justice be hailed as the father of modern Welsh prose.

Most of the works which were afterwards written in the strong idiomatic

Welsh of Morris Kyffin were on religious subjects, and many of them were

translated from the English. The first was _Ymarfer o Dduwioldeb_ (1630)

by Rowland Vychan o Gaergai (a translation of Bailey's _Practice of

Piety_), which was followed in 1632 by Dr John Davies's _Llyfr y

Resolution_, and in 1666 by _Hanes y Ffydd Ddiffuant_ (A History of the

True Faith) by Charles Edwards. All these authors and many of their

successors were strong adherents of the Established Church, which was

then intensely Welsh in sentiment. But in the midst of these churchmen,

a flame-bearer of dissent appeared--Morgan Llwyd o Wynedd, who published

in 1653 "a mystery to be understood of some, and scorned of

others"--_Llyfr y Tri Aderyn_ (The Book of the Three Birds). It is in

the form of a discussion between the eagle (Cromwell), the dove

(Dissent) and the raven (the Established Church). This book is certainly

the most important original composition published during the 17th

century, and to this day remains one of the widely-read classics of the

Welsh tongue. Morgan Llwyd wrote many other books in Welsh and English,

all more or less in the vein of the first book.

During the remaining years of this period, the prose output of the Welsh

press consisted mainly of devotional books, written or translated for or

at the instigation of the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. The

Established Church, with the help of this society, made a gallant

attempt to lighten the darkness of Wales by publishing books of this

description, and it is mainly due to its exertions that the lamp of

Welsh prose was kept burning during these years. Among the clergy who

produced books of this description were Edward Samuel (1674-1748), who

published among other works _Holl Ddyledswydd Dyn_, a translation of

_The Whole Duty of Man_ (1718); Moses Williams (1684-1742), a most

diligent searcher into Welsh MSS. and translator; Griffith Jones of

Llanddowror (1683-1761), the father of Welsh popular education; Iago ab

Dewi (1644?-1722) and Theophilus Evans (1694-1769), the famous author of

_Drych y Prif Oesoedd_ (1716 and 1740). This book, like _Llyfr y Tri

Aderyn_ and _Y Bardd Cwsc_, has an established position for all time in

the annals of Welsh literature.

We come now to the greatest of all Welsh prose writers, Ellis Wyn o

Lasynys (1671-1734). His first work was a translation of Jeremy Taylor's

_Holy Living_, under the title of _Rheol Buchedd Sanctaidd_ (1701). His

next work was the immortal _Gweledigaethau y Bardd Cwsc_ (1703). The

foundation of this work was L'Estrange's translation of the _Suenos_ of

the Spaniard Quevedo. Ellis Wyn has certainly followed his original

closely, even as Shakespeare followed his, but by his inimitable magic

he has transmuted the characters and the scenery of the Spaniard into

Welsh characters and scenery of the 17th century. No writer before or

after him has used the Welsh language with such force and skill, and he

will ever remain the stylist whom all Welsh writers will strive to

imitate. The magic of his work has endowed the stately idiom of Gwynedd

with such glamour that it has now become the standard idiom of Welsh

prose. See Stern, _Z. f. celt. Phil._ iii. 165 ff.

7. _The Rise of Popular Poetry, 1600-1750._--When Henry VII. ascended

the throne, the old hostility of the Welsh towards the English

disappeared. They had realized their wildest hope, that of seeing a

Welshman wearing "the crown of London." Naturally enough, therefore, the

descendants of the old Welsh gentry began to look towards England for

recognition and preferment, and their interest in their own little

country necessarily began to wane. The result was that the traditional

patrons of the Welsh muse could no longer understand the language of the

poets, and the poets were forced to seek some more profitable

employment. Besides, the old conditions were changing; the medieval

traditions were indeed dying hard, but it gradually and imperceptibly

came about that the poets of the older school had no audience. The only

poets who still followed the old traditions were the rich farmers who

"sang on their own land," as the Welsh phrase goes. A new school,

however, was rising. The nation at large had a vast store of

folk-poetry, full of all the poetical characteristics of the Celt, and

it was this very poetry, despised as it was, that became ultimately the

groundwork of the new literature.

The first landmark in this new development was the publication in 1621

of Edmwnd Prys's metrical version of the Psalms (followed by later

editions in 1628, 1630, 1638 and 1648), and of the first poem of the

_Welshmen's Candle_ (_Cannwyll y Cymry_) of Rhys Pritchard, vicar of

Llandovery (1569-1644). This was published in 1646. These works were not

written in the old metres peculiar to Wales, but in the free metres,

like those of English poetry. The former work is of the utmost

importance, as these Psalms were about the first metrical hymns in use.

They are often rugged and uncouth, but many of the verses--such as the

23rd Psalm--have a haunting melody of their own, which grips the mind

once and for ever. The second work, the first complete edition of which

was published in 1672, consisted of moral verses in the metres of the

old folk-songs (_Penillion Telyn_), and for nearly two centuries was the

"guide, philosopher and friend" of the common people. Many other poets

of the early part of this period wrote in these metres, such as Edward

Dafydd o Fargam (fl. 1640), Rowland Fychan, Morgan Llwyd o Wynedd and

William Phylip (d. 1669). Poetry in the free metres, however, was

generally very crude, until it was given a new dignity by the greatest

poet of the period, Huw Morus o Bont y Meibion (1622-1709). Most of his

earlier compositions, which are among his best, and which were

influenced to a great extent by the cavalier poetry of England, are love

poems, perfect marvels of felicitous ingenuity and sweetness. He fixed

the poetic canons of the free metres, and made what was before homely

and uncouth, courtly and dignified. He wrote a _cywydd marwnad_ to his

contemporary, Edward Morus o'r Perthi Llwydion (d. 1689), who was also a

poet of considerable merit. Most of his work is composed of "moral

pieces" and carols. Other poets of the period were Sion Dafydd Las

(1650-1691), who was among the last of the family bards, and Dafydd

Jones o Drefriw (fl. 1750). Towards the end of the period comes Lewys

Morys (1700-1765). His poetry alone does not seem to warrant his fame,

but he was the creator of a new period, the inspirer and the patron of

Goronwy Owen. According to the lights of the 18th century, he was, like

his brothers Richard and William, a scholar. His poetry, except a few

well-known pieces, will never be popular, because it does not conform to

modern canons of taste. His greatest merit is that he wrote the popular

poetry then in vogue with a scholar's elegance.

8. _The Revival, 1750-1830._--The two leading figures in this period are

Goronwy Owen (1722-1769) and William Williams, Pantycelyn (1717-1791).

Goronwy Owen wrote all his poetry in the _cynghanedd_, and his work gave

the old metres a new life. He raised them from the neglect into which

they had fallen, and caused them to be, till this day, the vehicle of

half the poetical thought of Wales. But he was in no way a

representative of his age; he, like Milton, sang among a crowd of

inferior poets themes quite detached from the life of his time, so that

he also, like his English brother, lacks "human interest." After Dafydd

ab Gwilym, he is the greatest poet who sang in the old metres, and the

influence of his correct and fastidious muse remains to this day.

William Williams, however, wrote in the free metres in a way that was

astoundingly fresh. It is not enough to say of him that he was a

hymnologist; he is much more, he is the national poet of Wales. He had

certainly the loftiest imagination of all the poets of five centuries,

and his influence on the Welsh people can be gauged by the fact that a

good deal of his idiom and dialect has fixed itself indelibly on modern

literary Welsh. Besides the hymns, he wrote a religious epic,

_Theomemphus_, which is to this day the national epic of evangelical

Wales. Even as Goronwy Owen is the father of modern Welsh poetry in the

old metres, so William Williams is the great fountain-head of the free

metres, because he set aflame the imagination of every poet that

succeeded him. With two such pioneers, it is natural that the rest of

this period should contain many great names. Thomas Edwards (Twm o'r

Nant) (1739-1810) has been called by an unwarrantably bold hyperbole,

"the Welsh Shakespeare." Most of his works are interludes and ballads,

and he used to be very popular with the common people; he is, to this

day, probably the oftenest quoted of all the Welsh poets. William Wynn,

rector of Llangynhafal (1704-1760), is the author of a "_Cywydd_ of the

Great Judgment," which bears comparison with Goronwy Owen's masterpiece.

Evan Evans (Ieuan Brydydd Hir) (1731-1789) was famous both as a poet and

as a scholar and antiquarian. Edward Rhisiart (1714-1777), the

schoolmaster of Ystradmeurig, was a scholar and a writer of pastorals in

the manner of Theocritus. Most of the other poets who flourished towards

the end of this period--Dafydd Ddu Eryri (1760-1822), Gwallter Mechain

(1761-1849), Robert ab Gwilym Ddu (1767-1850), Dafydd Ionawr

(1751-1827), Dewi Wyn o Eifion (1784-1841)--were brought into prominence

by the Eisteddfod, which began to increase in influence during this

period until it has become to-day the national festival. They all wrote

for the most part in _cynghanedd_, and the work of nearly all of them is

marked by correctness rather than by poetical inspiration.

9. _Prose after 1830._--In the preceding periods, we have seen that

Welsh prose, though abundant in quantity, had a very narrow range. Few

writers rose above theological controversy or moral treatises, and the

humaner side of literature was almost entirely neglected. In this

period, however, we find a prose literature that, with the exception of

scientific works, is as wide in its range as that of England, and all

departments are well and competently represented, though by but few

names. Dr Lewis Edwards (1809-1887) struck a new note when he began to

contribute his literary and theological essays to the periodicals, but,

though many have equalled and even surpassed him as theological

essayists, few, if any, of his followers have attempted the literary and

critical essays on which his fame as writer must mainly rest. Together

with Gwilym Hiraethog (1802-1883), the author of the inimitable

_Llythyrau Hen Ffarmwr_, he may be regarded as the pioneer of the new

literature. Samuel Roberts (1800-1885), generally known as S.R., wrote

numerous tracts and books on politics and economics, and as a political

thinker he was in many respects far in advance of his English

contemporaries. It was in this period, too, that Wales had her national

novelist, Daniel Owen (1836-1895). He was a novelist of the Dickens

school, and delighted like his great master "in writing mythology rather

than fiction." He has created a new literary atmosphere, in which the

characters of Puritanical and plebeian Wales move freely and without

restraint. He can never be eclipsed just as Sir Walter Scott cannot be

eclipsed, because the Wales which he describes is slowly passing away.

He has many worthy disciples, among whom Miss Winnie Parry is easily

first. Indeed, in her finer taste and greater firmness of touch, she

stands on a higher plane than even her great master. The inspiring

genius of the latter part of this period is Owen M. Edwards (b. 1858),

and, as a stylist, all writers of Welsh prose since Ellis Wynn have to

concede him the laurel. His little books of travel and history and

anecdote have created, or rather, are creating a new school of writers,

scrupulously and almost pedantically careful and correct, an ideal

which, on its philological side is the outcome of the scientific study

of the language as inaugurated by Sir John Rhys and Professor Morris

Jones. One of the earliest, if not the ablest writer of this "new Welsh"

was the independent and original Emrys ap Iwan (d. 1906), whose

_Homiliau_ was published in 1907.

10. _Poetry after 1820._--The origins of this period are really placed

in the last period. Its great characteristics are the development of the

lyric, and the influence of English and continental ideas. Just as the

_cywydd_ was among the older writers the favourite form of poetry, so

the lyric becomes now paramount, almost to the exclusion of other forms.

The first great name, after those already mentioned in the development

of this form of poetry, is that of Anne Griffiths (1776-1805). Her

poetry is exclusively composed of hymns, but to the English mind, the

word "hymn" is entirely inadequate to give any idea of the passion, the

mysticism and the rich symbolistic grace of her poems. She gave to the

Welsh lyric the depth and the rather melancholy intensity which has

always characterized it. Evan Evans (Ieuan Glan Geirionydd) (1795-1855)

was also a hymnologist, but he wrote many secular lyrics and

_awdlau_--among the former being the famous _Morfa Rhuddlan_. Ebenezer

Thomas (Eben Fardd) (1802-1863) was a famous _Eisteddfodwr_; his best

work is his _awdlau_, and no one will deny him the distinction of being

the master poet of the _awdl_ in the 19th century. Gwilym Cawrdaf

(1795-1848), also a writer of _awdlau_, has the gift of simple and

direct expression, well exemplified in _Hiraeth Cymro am ei wlad_.

Daniel Ddu (1792-1846) was a scholar who wrote some touching lyrics and

hymns. Gwilym Hiraethog (1802-1883) attempted an epic, _Emmanuel_, with

indifferent success. His shorter works and some of his _awdlau_ are of a

much higher order. Caledfryn (1801-1869) was a direct successor of Dewi

Wyn and the earlier writers of _awdlau_, but his _Drylliad y Rothsay

Castle_ is superior to anything which his master wrote. Similar in

genius, though not on quite as high a plane, were Nicander (1809-1874),

Cynddelw (1812-1875), Gwalchmai (1803-1897) and Tudno (1844-1895).

John Blackwell (Alun) (1797-1840) was a lyricist of the first order.

With Ieuan Glan Geirionydd, he is the pioneer of the secular lyric of

the 19th century. Succeeding to this group of lyricists, we have another

later group, Ceiriog (1832-1887), Talhaiarn (1810-1869) and Mynyddog

(1833-1877), who certainly had the advantage over their predecessors in

freshness, in vigour and in human interest, but they lacked the

scholastic training of the earlier group, and so their work is often

uneven, and cannot therefore be fairly compared with that of the earlier

poets. Ceiriog, of course, is the greater name of the three, and is to

Wales what Robert Burns was to Scotland, sharing with him his poetical

faults and merits. He is called the national poet of Wales, because he

was the first to sing of the land and the nation he knew, and he cast

the glamour of his genius over the life of the _gwerin_, the peasants of

Wales.

Somewhat higher flights were essayed by Gwilym Marles (1834-1879) and

Islwyn (1832-1878). Their poetry is Wordsworthian and mystical, and well

exemplifies the love of metaphysics and speculation which is growing in

Wales. Islwyn's _Y storm_, though uneven, is full of powerful passages,

and he was a master of blank verse. Of the remaining poets of the period

living in 1908, the most distinguished was the Rev. Elvet Lewis in the

older generation, and Eifion Wyn in the younger--both writers of lyrics.

Other lyrical poets of the first class are Gwylfa and Silyn Roberts. In

the old metres, two poets stand out prominent above all others--J.

Morris Jones and T. Gwynn Jones. The _Awdl i Famon_ of the former, and

the _Ymadawiad Arthur_ of the latter, gave reason to believe that Welsh

poetry was only entering on its golden period.

AUTHORITIES.--_General_.--T. Stephens, _Literature of the Kymry_

(London[2], 1876); L.C. Stern in _Die Kultur d. Gegenwart_, i. xi. 1

pp. 114-130; Gweirydd ap Rhys. _Hanes Llenyddiaeth Gymreig, 1300-1650_

(London, 1885); C. Ashton, _Hanes Llenyddiaeth Gymreig, 1651-1850_

(Liverpool, 1893); J. Loth, _Les Mabinogion_ (2 vols., Paris, 1889);

E. Anwyl, _Prolegomena to Welsh Poetry_ (London, 1905), also on the

Mabinogi in _Zeitschr. f. celt. Phil._ i. 277 ff.; I.B. John, _The

Mabinogion_ (London, 1901); T. Shankland, _Diwygwyr Cymru_, reprinted

from _Seren Gomer_ (1899); W.J. Gruffydd, _Foreign Influences on Welsh

Literature in the XIV. and XV. Centuries_, Guild of Welsh Graduates

(1908); Gwilym Lleyn, _Llyfryddiaeth y Cymry_ (Llanidloes, 1867);

Robert Williams, _Enwogion Cymru_ (Llandovery, 1852); Owen Jones,

_Cymru_ (2 vols., London, 1875); D.W. Nash, _History of the Battle of

Cattraeth_ (Tenby, 1861); _Encyclopaedia Cambrensis_ (10 vols.,[2]

1889-1896); C. Ashton, _Bywyd ac amserau yr Esgob Morgan_ (Treherbert,

1891); J. Foulkes, _J. Ceiriog Hughes, ei fywyd a'i waith_ (Liverpool,

1887); J.M. Jones, _Llenyddiaeth fy ngwlad_ (Holywell, 1893); H. Elvet

Lewis, _Sweet Singers of Wales_ (London, 1889); H.W. Lloyd, _Welsh

Books Printed Abroad in the XVI. and XVII. Centuries_ (London, 1881).

_Anthologies, Selected Prose and Verse, &c._--W.F. Skene, _The Four

Ancient Books of Wales_ (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1868); W. Owen (Pughe),

Iolo Morganwg and Owen Jones (Myfyr), _Myvyrian Archaiology of Wales_

(3 vols., London, 1801;[2] Denbigh, 1870, in 1 vol.); Dr John Davies

(o Fallwyd), _Flores Poetarum Britannicorum_ (Shrewsbury, 1710;

Swansea, 1814; reprinted London, 1864); Iolo Morganwg, _Iolo

Manuscripts_ (Llandovery, 1848); E. Evans, _Some Specimens of the

Poetry of the Antient Welsh Bards translated into English, &c._

(London, 1764); Hugh Jones, _Dewisol Ganiadau yr Oes Hon_ (Shrewsbury,

1759;[5] Merthyr, 1827), _Diddanwch Teuluaidd_ (London, 1763); David

Jones, _Blodeugerdd Cymry_ (Shrewsbury[2], 1779); Owen Jones, _Ceinion

Llenyddiaeth Gymreig_ (2 vols., London, 1876); W. Lewis Jones,

_Caniadau Cymru_ (Bangor[2], 1908); W. Jenkyn Thomas, _Penillion

Telyn_ (Carnarvon, 1894); Myrddin Fardd, _Cynfeirdd Lleyn_ (1905);

_Cyfres Lien Cymru_, vols. i.-vi. (Cardiff, 1900-1906); W.J. Gruffydd,

_Y Flodeugerdd Newydd_ (Cardiff, 1908); O.M. Edwards, _Beirdd y

Berwyn_ (Conway, 1903).

_Versification, &c_,--Dafydd Morganwg, _Yr Ysgol Farddol_ (Cardiff[3],

1887); Iolo Morganwg, _Cyfrinach Beirdd Ynys Prydain_ (Merthyr,

1829;[2] Carnarvon, 1874); _Simwnt Vychan and Dafydd Ddu Athraw,

Dosparth Edeyrn Davod Aur_, ed. by J. Williams ab Ithel (Llandovery,

1856); J. Morris Jones, "Welsh Versification," _Zeitschr.f. celt.

Phil._ iv. pp. 106-142.

_Collected Works, Editions and Reprints_,--J. Gwenogvryn Evans and

John Rhys, _Y Llyvyr Coch o Hergest_ (2 vols. Oxford, 1887-1890),

_Pedeir Kainc y Mabinogi_ (Oxford, 1897); J. Gwenogvryn Evans, _The

Black Book of Carmarthen_ (Oxford, 1907; also in facsimile, Oxford,

1888), _Llyvyr Job trans. by Dr Morgan, 1558_ (reprinted 1888), _Oll

Synwyr pen_ [Salesbury] (Bangor, 1902); J. Morris Jones and John Rhys,

_Llyvyr Agkyr Llandewivrevi_ (Oxford, 1894); Aneurin Owen, _Ancient

Laws and Institutes of Wales_ (2 vols., London, 1841), _Brut y

Tywysogion_ (London, 1863); J. Williams ab Ithel, _Gododin with Notes

and Translation_ (Llandovery, 1852); T. Stephens, _Gododin with Notes

and Translation_, ed. by T. Powel (London, 1888); R. Williams,

_Selections from the Hengwrt MSS._ (2 vols., London, 1876-1892); T.

Powel, _Ystorya de Carolo Magno_ (London, 1883); _Psalmau Dafydd

trans. by W. Morgan_ (facsimile, 1896); Owen Jones (Myfyr) and W. Owen

(Pughe), _Barddoniaeth Dafydd ab Gwilym_ (London, 1789); Walter Davies

and J. Jones, _Poetical Works of Lewis Glyn Cothi_ (1837); Prince

Louis Bonaparte, _Athrawaeth Gristnogavl by Morys Clynoc_ (facsimile

London, 1880); Walter Davies, _Caniadau Huw Morus_ (2 vols., 1823);

_Psalmau Dafydd gan W. Middleton_ (Llanfair, 1827); J. Morris Jones,

_Gweledugaethai y Bardd cwsg gan Elis Wynne_ (Bangor, 1898); R. Jones,

_The Poetical Works of Goronwy Owen_ (2 vols. London, 1876); W.J.

Gruffydd, _Cywyddau Goronwy Owen_ (Newport, 1906); T.E. Ellis,

_Gweithiau Morgan Llwyd_ (Bangor, 1899); J.H. Davies, _Yn y Llyvyr

hwn_ (Bangor, 1902); S.J. Evans, _Drych y Prif Oesoedd gan Th. Evans_

(Bangor, 1902); W.P. Williams, _Deffyniad Ffydd Eglwys Loegr gan Morys

Kyffin_ (Bangor, 1908); N. Cynhafal Jones, _Gweithiau W. Williams

Pantycelyn_ (2 vols., 1887-1891); O.M. Edwards, _Gweithiau Islwyn_

(1897). (W. J. G.)

V. BRETON LITERATURE.--Unlike the literature of Wales, the literature of

Brittany is destitute of originality, and we find nothing to compare

with the _Mabinogion_. Till the 19th century all the monuments which

have come down to us are copies of French models, though the retention

down to the 17th century of that intricate system of versification found

in Welsh and Cornish may indicate that what was really Breton in spirit

has not been preserved (v. J. Loth, _La Metrique galloise_, ii.

177-203). It is usual to divide the literature into three periods in

conformity with the language in which the monuments are written--Old,

Middle, and Modern Breton. No connected monuments of the first period

(8th to 11th centuries) have come down to us. For our knowledge of the

language of this period we must have recourse to the manuscripts

containing glosses and the names occurring in ancient documents. The

chief collections of glosses are (1) the Oxford glosses on Eutychius;

(2) the Luxemburg glosses; (3) the Bern glosses on Virgil; (4) the

glosses on Amalarius (Corpus Christi, Cambridge); (5) five _Collationes

Canonum_, the chief manuscripts being at Paris and Orleans. All these

glosses have been published in one volume by J. Loth (_Vocabulaire

Vieux-Breton_, Paris, 1884). From a linguistic point of view the Breton

names in the Latin lives of saints are very important, particularly

those of St Samson, St Paul, Aurelian, St Winwaloe, St Ninnoc, St Gildas

and St Brieuc. Of even greater value are the names in the Charter of

Redon, which was written in the 11th century, but dates largely from the

9th (published by A. de Courson, 1865); we may also mention the Charter

of Landevennec (11th century). In the Middle Breton period, which

extends from the 11th to the 17th centuries, we are obliged, down to the

15th century, to rely on official documents such as the Charter of

Quimperle. French seems to have been the language of the aristocracy and

the medium of culture. Hence the oldest connected texts are either

translated or imitated from French, and are full of French words. We

might mention a Book of Hours belonging to the 16th century, published

by Whitley Stokes, and three religious poems bound up with the _Grand

Mystere de Jesus_; further, the _Life of St Catherine_ (1576) in prose

(published by Ernault, _Revue celtique_, viii. 76), translated from the

_Golden Legend_, the _Mirror of Death_, containing 3360 verses, which

was composed in 1519 and printed in 1576, the _Mirror of Confession_, a

translation from the French in prose (1621), the _Christian Doctrine_, a

translation in verse (1622), a collection of carols (_An Nouelou

ancien_, 1650, _Rev. celt._ vols. x.-xiii.) and the _Christian

Meditations_ of J. Cadec, 1651 (_Rev. Celt._ xx. 56). The earliest

Breton printed work is the _Catholicon_ of Jean Lagadeuc, a

Breton-Latin-French dictionary, dated 1464 but printed first in 1499

(reprinted by R.F. Le Men, Lorient, 1867). Modern Breton begins with the

orthographical reforms of the Jesuit, Julien Maunoir, whose grammar (_Le

Sacre College de Jesus_) and dictionary appeared in 1659. Throughout the

modern period we find numerous collections of religious poems and

manuals of devotion in prose and verse, which we cannot here attempt to

enumerate. But the bulk of Breton literature before the 19th century

consists of mysteries and miracle plays. This class of literature had a

tremendous vogue in Brittany, and the native stage was only killed about

1850. It is stated, for instance, that no less than 15,000 copies were

sold of the _Tragedy of the Four Sons of Aymon_, first published in

1815. It is impossible to give the titles of all the dramas which have

come down to us (about 120). The manuscript collection of the

Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris is described in the _Revue celtique_,

xi. 389-423 (many since published) and Le Braz gives a useful list of

other manuscripts in the bibliographical appendix to his _Theatre

celtique_. A few of these plays belong to the Middle Breton period. The

_Life of St Nonn_, the mother of St David, belongs to the end of the

15th century, and follows the Latin life (published by Ernault in the

_Revue celtique_, viii. 230 ff., 405 ff.). _Le Grand Mystere de Jesus_

(1513) follows the French play of Arnoul Gresban and Jean Michel

(published by H. de la Villemarque, Paris, 1865). A French original is

also followed in the _Mystere de Sainte Barbe_ (1st ed., 1557, 2nd ed.,

1647, reprinted by Ernault, Nantes, 1885). These mystery plays may be

divided into four categories according to the subjects with which they

deal: (1) Old Testament subjects; (2) New Testament subjects; (3) lives

of saints; (4) romances of chivalry. There is occasionally a dash of

local colouring in these plays; but the subject matter is taken from

French sources or, in the case of the third category, from Latin lives.

Even when the life of a Breton saint, e.g. St Gwennole, is dramatized,

the treatment is the traditional one accorded to all saints of whatever

origin. Amongst the most favourite subjects in addition to those already

mentioned we may note the following: _Vie des quatre fils Aymon_, _Ste

Tryphine et le roi Arthur_, _Huon de Bordeaux_, _Vie de Louis Eunius_,

_Robert le Diable_. These mysteries commonly contain from 5000 to 9000

lines of either 12 or 8 syllables apiece. For the sake of completeness

we may add the names of three farces, described by Le Braz: _Ar Farvel

goapaer_ (_Le bouffon moqueur_), _Ian Melarge_ (_Mardi-gras_), _La Vie

de Mardi-gras, de triste Mine, sa femme, et de ses enfants_. The actors,

who were always peasants, came to be regarded with an unfavourable eye

by the clergy, who finally succeeded in killing the Breton stage.

We look in vain for any manifestation of originality in Breton

literature until we reach the 19th century. The consciousness of

nationality then awakened and found expression in verse.

The movement led by Le Gonidec (described above in the section on Breton

language) caused ardent patriots to endeavour to create a national

literature, more especially when the attention of the whole world of

letters was directed to Brittany after the publication of the _Barzas

Breiz_. The most prominent of these pioneers were Auguste Brizeux, F.M.

Luzel and Prosper Proux. Brizeux (1803-1858), better known as a French

poet, wrote a collection of lyrics entitled _Telen Arvor_, or the

_Armorican Harp_ (Lorient, 1844, reprinted Paris, 1903). Luzel's

original compositions were published under the title of _Bepred Breizad,

Toujours Breton_ (Morlaix, 1865), and Prosper Proux is known as the

author of _Canaouenno gret gant eur C'hernewod_ (1838) and _Ar Bombard

Kerne_, or _The Hautboy of Cornouailles_ (Guingamp, 1866). Dottin also

mentions _Telenn Remengol_, by J. Lescour (Brest, 1867); _Telenn

Gwengam_, by the same writer (Brest, 1869), a volume of _Chansoniou_ by

Y.M. Thomas (Lannion, 1870), and another by C. Rannou. This was a very

creditable beginning, but the themes of these writers are apt to be

somewhat conventional and the constant recurrence of the same situation

or the same idea grows monotonous. An anthology of poems connected with

this movement appeared at Quimperle in 1862 under the title of _Bleuniou

Breiz, Poesies anciennes et modernes de la Basse-Bretagne_ (reprinted,

Paris, 1905). Several of La Fontaine's fables were published in a Breton

dress by P.D. de Goesbriand (Morlaix, 1836), and a collection of fables

in verse which is thought very highly of by cultivated Bretons appeared

under the title of _Marvaillou Grac'h koz_ by G. Milin (Brest, 1867). A

book of Georgics in the dialect of Vannes appeared under the title of

_Levr al labourer_ (The Farmer's Book) by l'Abbe Guillome (Vannes,

1849), and Le Gonidec prepared a translation of the Scriptures, which

was revised by Troude and Milin, and published at St Brieuc in 1868. But

the real literature of Brittany consists of legends, folk-tales and

ballads. The first to tap this source was Hersart de la Villemarque

(1815-1895), who issued in 1839 his famous collection of ballads

entitled _Barzas Breiz_, but which cannot be regarded as an anthology of

Breton popular poetry. The publication of this work gave rise to a

controversy which is almost as famous as that caused by Macpherson's

forgeries. De la Villemarque was endowed with considerable poetic gifts,

and, coming as he did at a time when folk-poetry was the fashion, he

determined to collect the popular literature of his own country.

However, he was not content to publish the poems as he found them

circulating in Brittany. With the aid of several collaborators he

transformed his material, eliminating anything that was crude and gross.

The poems included in his collection may be divided into three classes:

(1) Poems rearranged by himself or others. These consist mainly of

love-songs and ballads. (2) Modern poems transferred to medieval times.

(3) Spurious poems dealing with such personages as Nominoe and Merlin.

The compiler of the _Barzas Breiz_ unfortunately laboured under the

delusion that these Breton folk-songs were in the first instance the

work of medieval bards corresponding to Taliessin and Llywarch Hen in

Wales, and that it was possible to make them appear in their primitive

dress. The very title of the collection indicates the artificial nature

of the contents. For _Barzas_ (in the 2nd edition of 1867 spelt

_Barzaz_) is not a Breton word at all but is formed on Welsh _barddas_

(bardic poems). For the whole controversy the reader may consult H.

Gaidoz and P. Sebillot, "Bibliographie des traditions et de la

litterature populaire de la Bretagne" (_Revue celtique_, v. 277 ff., and

G. Dottin in the _Revue de synthese historique_, viii. 95 ff.). In

Brittany it is usual to divide the popular poetry into _gwerziou_ and

_soniou_. The _gwerziou_ (complaintes) deal with local history,

folk-lore, religious legends and superstitions, and are in general much

more original than the other class. The _soniou_ consist of love-songs,

satires, carols and marriage-lays, as well as others dealing with

professional occupations, and seem in many cases to show traces of

French influence. The first scholar who published the genuine ballad

literature of Brittany was F.M. Luzel, who issued two volumes under the

title of _Gwerziou Breiz-Izel, chants populaires de la Basse-Bretagne_

(Lorient and Paris, 1868, 1874). This collection contains several of the

originals of poems in the _Barzas Breiz_. Luzel is also the author of a

collection of Breton tales in French translation, _Contes bretons

recueillis et traduits par F.M. Luzel_ (Quimperle, 1870). The same

author published _Les Legendes chretiennes de la Basse-Bretagne_ (Paris,

1881) and _Veillees bretonnes, moeurs, chants, contes et recits

populaires des Bretons-Armoricains_ (Morlaix, 1879). Another

indefatigable collector of Breton legends is Anatole le Braz, who was

commissioned by the minister of public instruction to investigate the

stories current with reference to _An Ankou_ (death). Le Braz's results

are to be found in his _La Legende de la mort_ (1902[2]). A well-known

collection of stories with a French translation was issued by the

lexicographer Troude under the title of _Ar marvailler brezounek_

(Brest, 1870), and one of the most popular books at the present day is

_Pipi Gonto_, by A. le Moal (St Brieuc, vol. i. 1902, vol. ii. 1908). A

recent collection of stories with a religious tendency is C.M. le Prat's

_Marvailhou ar Vretoned_ (Brest, 1907). The modern movement, which

started in the 'nineties of last century, has already produced numerous

dramas and volumes of lyrics, and it may now be affirmed in all

seriousness that Brittany is producing something really national. The

scope of the writers of the earlier movement was very limited and little

originality was displayed in their productions. The literary output of

the last ten years in Brittany may truly be termed prodigious, and much

of it reaches quite a high level. The dramas which are being produced

are mainly propagandist in the interests either of the _Union

Regionaliste Bretonne_ or of temperance reform. These are for the most

part very crude, but they have been received with great enthusiasm, and

this has led to the revival of the old mysteries, though in a somewhat

modified form. The foremost living writer is Fanch Jaffrennou, who

writes under the name of "_Taldir_" (Brow of Steel) and is the author of

two very striking volumes of lyrics--_An Hirvoudou_ or _Sighs_ (St

Brieuc, 1899) and _An Delen Dir_ or _The Harp of Steel_ (St Brieuc,

1900). The latter is the most interesting outcome of the modern

movement. Among other poets we may mention N. Quellien (_Annaik_, Paris,

1880; _Breiz, Poesies bretonnes_, Paris, 1898), Erwan Berthou (_Dre an

Delen hag ar c'horn-boud, Par la harpe et par le cor de guerre_, St

Brieuc, 1904), C.M. le Prat, who writes under the name of Klaoda (_Mouez

Reier Plougastel_, "The Voice of the Cliffs of Plougastel," St Brieuc,

1905), J. Cuillandre (_Mouez an Aochou, La Voix des greves_, Rennes,

1903), abbe Lec'hvien, _Gwerziou ha soniou_ (St Brieuc, 1900), and,

further, two anonymous volumes of verse, _An Tremener, Gwerziou ha

soniou_ (Brest, 1900), and _Kanaouennou Kerne_ (Brest, 1900). Two older

collections are mentioned by Dottin--J. Cadiou, _En Breiz-Izel_

(Morlaix, 1885) and _Ivona_ (Morlaix, 1886). An anthology of latter-day

lyrics appeared at Rennes in 1902 under the title of _Bleuniou

Breiz-Izel, Dibab Barzoniezou_. Of the numerous plays those most

deserving of mention from a literary point of view are perhaps _Ar

Vezventi_ by T. le Garrec; the comedy _Alanik al Louarn_ by J.M. Perrot

(Brest, 1905) based on the farce of Pathelin; Tanguy Malmanche, _Le

Conte de l'ame qui a faim_, in which Breton superstitions connected with

the spirits of the dead are introduced with strange effect; J. le Bayon,

_En Eutru Keriolet_ (Vannes, 1902), which deals with the life and death

of a blaspheming Breton nobleman of the early part of the 17th century;

F. Jaffrennou, _Pontkallek_ (Brest, 1903), which tells of the betrayal

of a noble Breton who was put to death by the French in 1720; and the

farce _Eur Pesk-Ebrel_ by L. Rennadis (Morlaix, 1900).

AUTHORITIES.--A history of Breton literature does not exist, though we

possess ample materials for such a work. The following works and

articles may be consulted: G. Dottin. _Revue de synthese historique_,

viii, 93-104, contains a full bibliography; J. Loth, _Chrestomathie

bretonne_ (Paris, 1890); L.C. Stern in _Die Kultur d. Gegenwart_, i.

xi. 1, pp. 132-137; A. le Braz, _Le Theatre celtique_ (Paris, 1904);

H. Gaidoz and P. Sebillot, "Bibliographie des traditions et de la

litterature populaire de la Bretagne" (_Revue celtique_, v. 277-338;

supplement by P. Sebillot_, Revue de Bretagne, de Vendee, et d'Anjou_,

1894); F.M. Luzel, "Formules initiates et finales des conteurs en

Basse-Bretagne" (_Revue celtique_, iii. 336 ff.); L.F. Sauve,

"Formulettes et traditions diverses de la Basse-Bretagne" (_Revue

celtique_, v. 157 ff.); _Charmes_, "Oraisons et conjurations

magiques," ib vi. 66 ff.; "Devinettes bretonnes," _ib._ iv 60 ff.;

"Proverbes et dictons de la Basse-Bretagne," _ib._ i-iii. For Breton

proverbs see also A. Brizeux, "Furnez Breiz," in _Oeuvres de A.

Brizeux_ (Paris, 1903); J. Loth, "Chansons en bas-vannetais" (_Revue

celtique_, vii. 171 ff.); N. Quellien, _Chansons et danses des

Bretons_ (Paris, 1889); E. Ernault, "Chansons populaires" (_Revue

celtique_, xxiii. 121 ff.); P. le Roux, "Une Chanson bretonne du

xviii^e siecle" (_Revue celtique_, xix. 1). Since 1901 a complete

bibliography of modern works pertaining to Breton language and

literature appears from time to time in the _Annales de Bretagne._

(E. C. Q.)

VI. CORNISH LITERATURE.--The literature of Cornwall is more destitute of

originality and more limited in scope than that of Brittany, and it is

remarkable that the medieval drama should occupy the most prominent

place in both. The earliest Cornish we know consists of proper names and

a vocabulary. About 200 Cornish names occur among the manumissions of

serfs in the Bodmin Gospels (10th century). They were printed by Whitley

Stokes in the _Revue celtique_, i. 232. Next comes the Cottonian

Vocabulary, which seems to follow a similar Anglo-Saxon collection and

is contained in a 12th-century MS. at the British Museum. It consists of

seven pages and the words are classified under various headings, such as

heaven and earth, different parts of the human body, birds, beasts,

fishes, trees, herbs, ecclesiastical and liturgical terms. At the end we

find a number of adjectives. This vocabulary was printed by Zeuss[2], p.

1065, and again in alphabetical order by Norris in the _Ordinalia_. The

language of this document is termed Old Cornish, although the forms it

contains correspond to those of Mid. Welsh and Mid. Breton.

The first piece of connected Cornish which we know consists of a poem,

or portion of a play(?), of forty-one lines discovered by Jenner in the

British Museum. This fragment was probably written about 1400 and deals

with the subject of marriage (edited by W. Stokes in the _Revue

celtique_, iv. 258). A little later is the _Poem of Mount Calvary_ or

_the Passion_, of which five MSS. are in existence. The poem has been

twice printed, first by Davies Gilbert with English translation by John

Keigwin (1826), and again by W. Stokes for the London Philological

Society in 1862. It consists of 259 stanzas of eight lines of seven

syllables apiece, and contains a versified narrative of the events of

the Passion made up from the Gospels and apocryphal sources, notably the

Gospel of Nicodemus. But the bulk of Cornish literature is made up of

plays, and in this connexion it may be noted that there still exist in

the west of Cornwall the remains of a number of open-air amphitheatres,

locally called _plan an guari_, where the plays seem to have been acted.

The earliest representatives of this kind of literature in Cornwall form

a trilogy going under the name of _Ordinalia_, of which three MSS. are

known, one a 15th-century Oxford MS. from which the two others are

copied. The _Ordinalia_ were published by Edwin Norris under the title

of _The Ancient Cornish Drama_ (Oxford, 1859). The first play is called

_Origo Mundi_ and deals with events from the Old Testament down to the

building of Solomon's temple. The second play, the _Passio Domini_, goes

on without interruption into the third, the _Resurrectio Domini_, which

embraces the Harrowing of Hell, the Resurrection and Ascension, the

legend of St Veronica and Tiberius, and the death of Pilate. Here again

the pseudo-Gospel of Nicodemus is drawn upon, and interwoven with the

Scriptural narrative we find the Legend of the Cross. As the title

_Ordinalia_ indicates, these plays are of learned origin and are

imitated from English sources. The popular name for these dramas,

_quari-mirkle_, is a literal translation of the English term miracle

play, and Norris shows that whole passages were translated word for

word. Many of the events are represented as having taken place in

well-known Cornish localities, but apart from this scarcely any traces

of originality can be discovered. The same remark holds good in the case

of another play, _Beunans Meriasek_ or the _Life of St Meriasek._ This

deals in an incoherent manner with the life and death of Meriasek (in

Breton _Meriadek_), the son of a duke of Brittany, and interwoven with

this theme is the legend of St Silvester and the emperor Constantine,

quite regardless of the circumstance that St Silvester lived in the 4th

and St Meriasek in the 7th century. The MS. of this play was written by

"Dominus Hadton" in the year 1504, and is preserved in the Peniarth

library. The language is more recent than that of the _Ordinalia_, and

there is a certain admixture of English. The _Life of St Meriasek_ falls

into two parts, and at the end of each the spectators are invited to

carouse. St Meriasek was in earlier times the patron saint of Camborne,

where his fountain is still to be seen and pilgrims to it were known by

the name of _Merra-sickers._ In this play, consequently, we might expect

to find something really Cornish. But le Braz has shown that the author

of this motley drama was content to draw his materials from Latin and

English lives of saints. The story of Meriasek himself was taken from a

Breton source and closely resembles the narrative of the 17th-century

Breton hagiographer, Albert le Grand. The last play we have to mention

is _Gwreans an Bys_ (The Creation of the World), of which five complete

copies are known. Two of these are in the Bodleian and one in the

British Museum, which also possesses a further fragment. The oldest text

was revised by William Jordan of Helston in 1611, but there are

indications that parts of it at any rate are older than the Reformation.

This play bears a great resemblance to the first part of the _Origo

Mundi_, and may have been imitated from it. It was printed first by

Davies Gilbert in 1827 with a translation by John Keigwin, and again by

W. Stokes in the _Transactions of the London Philological Society_ for

1864. The language shows considerable signs of decay, and Lucifer and

his angels are often made to speak English. The only other original

compositions of any length written in Cornish are _Nebbaz Gerriau dro

tho Carnoack_ (A Few Words about Cornish), by John Boson (printed in the

_Journal of the Royal Institution of Cornwall_, 1879), and the _Story of

John of Chy-an-Hur_ (Ram's House), a folk-tale which appears in Ireland

and elsewhere. The latter was printed in Lhuyd's _Grammar_ and in

Pryce's _Archaeologia_. Andrew Borde's _Booke of the Introduction of

Knowledge_ (1542) contains some Cornish conversations (see _Archiv f.

celt. Lexikographie_, vol. i.), and in Carew's _Survey of Cornwall_ a

number of words and phrases are to be found. Apart from the Cornish

preface to Lhuyd's _Grammar_, the other remains of the language consist

of a few songs, verses, proverbs, epigrams, epitaphs, maxims, letters,

conversations, mottoes and translations of chapters and passages of

Scripture, the Lord's Prayer, the Creed, the Commandments, King

Charles's Letter, &c. These fragments are to be found (1) in the Gwavas

MS. in the British Museum, a collection ranging in date from 1709 to

1736; (2) in the Borlase MS. (1750); (3) in Pryce's _Archaeologia

Cornu-Britannica_ (1790); (4) in D. Gilbert's editions of the _Poem of

the Passion_ (1826) and the Creation of the World (1827). They are

enumerated, classified and described by Jenner in his _Handbook._

AUTHORITIES.--H. Jenner, _Handbook of the Cornish Language_ (London,

1904); A. le Braz, _Le Theatre celtique_ (Paris, 1905); E. Norris,

_The Ancient Cornish Drama_ (2 vols., Oxford, 1859); T.C. Peter, _The

Old Cornish Drama_ (London, 1906); L.C. Stern, _Die Kultur d.

Gegenwart_, i. xi. 1, pp. 131-132. (E. C. Q.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Cat" to "Celt" Volume 5, Slice 5 · 第 53 / 54 题