The argument

Celsus opens the way for his own attack by rehearsing the taunts

levelled at the Christians by the Jews. Jesus was born in adultery and

nurtured on the wisdom of Egypt. His assertion of divine dignity is

disproved by his poverty and his miserable end. Christians have no

standing in the Old Testament prophecies, and their talk of a

resurrection that was only revealed to some of their own adherents is

foolishness. Celsus indeed says that the Jews are almost as ridiculous

as the foes they attack; the latter said the saviour from Heaven had

come, the former still looked for his coming. However, the Jews have

the advantage of being an ancient nation with an ancient faith. The

idea of an Incarnation of God is absurd; why should the human race

think itself so superior to bees, ants and elephants as to be put in

this unique relation to its maker? And why should God choose to come

to men as a Jew? The Christian idea of a special providence is

nonsense, an insult to the deity. Christians are like a council of

frogs in a marsh or a synod of worms on a dunghill, croaking and

squeaking, "For our sakes was the world created." It is much more

reasonable to believe that each part of the world has its own special

deity; prophets and supernatural messengers had forsooth appeared in

more places than one. Besides being bad philosophy based on fictitious

history, Christianity is not respectable. Celsus does not indeed

repeat the Thyestean charges so frequently brought against Christians

by their calumniators, but he says the Christian teachers who are

mainly weavers and cobblers have no power over men of education. The

qualifications for conversion are ignorance and childish timidity.

Like all quacks they gather a crowd of slaves, children, women and

idlers. "I speak bitterly about this," says Celsus, "because I feel

bitterly. When we are invited to the Mysteries the masters use another

tone. They say, 'Come to us ye who are of clean hands and pure speech,

ye who are unstained by crime, who have a good conscience towards God,

who have done justly and lived uprightly.' The Jews say, 'Come to us

ye who are sinners, ye who are fools or children, ye who are

miserable, and ye shall enter into the kingdom of Heaven.' The rogue,

the thief, the burglar, the poisoner, the spoiler of temples and

tombs, these are their proselytes. Jesus, they say, was sent to save

sinners; was he not sent to help those who have kept themselves free

from sin? They pretend that God will save the unjust man if he repents

and humbles himself. The just man who has held steady from the cradle

in the ways of virtue He will not look upon." He pours scorn upon the

exorcists--who were clearly in league with the demons themselves--and

upon the excesses of the itinerant and undisciplined "prophets" who

roam through cities and camps and commit to everlasting fire cities

and lands and their inhabitants. Above all Christians are disloyal,

and every church is an illicit collegium, an insinuation deadly at any

time, but especially so under Marcus Aurelius. Why cannot Christians

attach themselves to the great philosophic and political authorities

of the world? A properly understood worship of gods and demons is

quite compatible with a purified monotheism, and they might as well

give up the mad idea of winning the authorities over to their faith,

or of hoping to attain anything like universal agreement on divine

things.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Cat" to "Celt" Volume 5, Slice 5 · 第 44 / 54 题