FIG. 3.--Hunting Call.]

The hunting-horn, whether in its simplest form or with the one spiral,

was held with the bell upwards on a level with the huntsman's head or

just above it.[31]

A horn of the same fine calibre as the French horn, 3 or 4 ft. in

length, slightly bent to take the curve of the body, was in use in

Italy, it would seem, in the 15th century.[32] It was held slanting

across the body with the bell already slightly parabolic, at arm's

length to the left side.

The hunting- and post-horns were favourite emblems on medieval coats

of arms, more especially in Germany[33] and Bohemia.

It is necessary at this point to draw attention to the fact that the

French horn is a hybrid having affinities with both trumpet and

primitive animal horn, or with _buccina_ and _cornu_, and that both

types, although frequently misnamed and confused by medieval writers

and miniaturists, subsisted side by side, evolving independently until

they merged in the so-called French horn. Both buccina and cornu after

the fall of the Roman Empire, while Western arts and crafts were in

their infancy, were made straight, being then known as the busine or

straight trumpet (busaun or posaun in Germany), and the long horn,

_Herhorn_, slightly curved.[34]

[Illusration: FIG. 4.--Medieval Circular Horn.]

[Illusration: FIG. 5.--Medieval Circular Horn, 1589.]

From two medieval representations of instruments like the Roman cornu

one might be led to conclude that the instrument had been revived and

was in use from the 14th century. A wooden bas-relief on the under

part of the seats of the choir of Worcester cathedral,[35] said to

date from the 14th century, shows a musician in a robe with long

sleeves of fur playing the horn (fig. 4). The tube winds from the

mouth in a circle reaching to his waist, passes under the right arm

across the shoulders with the bell stretching out horizontally over

his left shoulder. The tube, of strictly conical bore, is made in

three pieces, the joints being strengthened by means of two rings. The

other example is German, and figures in the arms of the city of

Frankfort-on-Main.[36] Here in the two opposite corners are two

cherubs playing immense cornua. The bore of the instruments (fig. 5)

is of a calibre suggestive of the contrabass tuba; the circle formed

is of a diameter sufficiently large to accommodate the youthful

performer in a sitting posture; the bell is the forerunner of that of

the modern saxophone, shaped like a gloxinea; the mouthpiece is

cup-shaped. It is possible, of course, that these two examples are

attempts to reproduce the classic instrument, but the figures of the

musicians and the feeling of the whole scheme of ornamentation seem to

render such an explanation improbable. Moreover, Sebastian

Virdung,[37] writing on musical instruments at the beginning of the

16th century, gives a drawing of a cornu coiled round tightly, the

tubing being probably soldered together at certain points. Virdung

calls this instrument a _Jegerhorn_, and the short hunting-horn

_Acherhorn_ (Ackerhorn--the synonym of the modern Waldhorn). The scale

of the former could have consisted only of the first eight harmonics,

including the fundamental, which would be easily obtained on an

instrument of such a large calibre. Mersenne,[38] a century and a

quarter later, gives a drawing of the same kind of horn among his

_cors de chasse_, but does not in his description display his

customary intimate knowledge of his subject; it may be that he was

dealing at second-hand with an instrument of which he had had little

practical experience. Praetorius[39] gives as Jagerhorn only the

simple forms of crescent-shaped horns with a single spiral; the

spirally-wound horn of Virdung is replaced by a new instrument--the

_Jagertrummet_ (huntsman's trumpet)--of the same form, but less

cumbersome, of cylindrical bore excepting at the bell end and having a

crook inserted between the mouthpiece and the main coils. The tube,

which could not have been less than 8 ft. long, produced the harmonic

series of the cavalry trumpet from the 3rd to the 12th. The

restrictions placed upon the use of the cavalry trumpet would have

rendered it unavailable for use in the hunting-field, but the

snake-shaped model, as Praetorius describes it, was a decided

improvement on the horn, although inferior in resonance to the cavalry

model. Here then are the materials for the fusion of the trumpet and

hunting-horn into the natural or hand-horn of the 17th and 18th

centuries. There is evidence, however, that a century earlier, i.e. at

the end of the 15th century, the art of bending a brass tube of the

delicate proportions of the French horn, which is still a test of fine

workmanship, had been successfully practised. In an illustrated

edition of Virgil's works published in Strassburg in 1502 and

emanating from Gruninger's office, Brant being responsible for the

illustrations, the lines (_Aen._ viii. 1-2) "Ut belli signum Laurenti

Turnus ab arce Extulit: et rauco strepuerunt cornua cantu" are

illustrated by two soldiers, one with the sackbut (posaune, the

descendant of the buccina), the other with a horn wound spirally round

his body in three coils, which appear to have a conical bore from the

funnel-shaped mouthpiece to the bell which extends at the back of the

head horizontally over the left shoulder (fig. 6). There is ample

room for the performer's head and shoulders to pass through the

circle: the length of the tube could not therefore have been much less

than 16 ft. long, equivalent to the horn in C or B[flat] basso. In the

same book (pl. ccci.) is another horn, smaller, differing slightly in

the disposition of the coils and held like the modern horn in front.

[Illustration: FIG. 6.--Spirally Coiled Horn from Virgil's Works

(1502), folio cccviii. versa.]

These horns were not used for hunting but for war in conjunction with

the draw-trumpet. Brant could not have imagined these instruments, and

must have seen the originals or at least drawings of them; the

instruments probably emanated from the famed workshops of Nuremberg,

being intended mainly for use in Italy, and had not been generally

adopted in Germany. The significance of these drawings of natural

horns in a German work of the dawn of the 16th century will not be

lost. It disposes once and for all of the oft-repeated fable that the

hunting-horn first assumed its present form in France about 1680, a

statement accepted without question by authorities of all countries,

but without reference to any _piece justificative_ other than the

story of the Bohemian Count Sporken first quoted by Gerber,[40] and

repeated in most musical works without the context. The account which

gave rise to this statement had been published in 1782 in a book by

Faustinus Prochaska:[41] "Vix Parisiis inflandi cornua venatoria

inventa ars quum delectatus suavitate cantus duos ex hominibus sibi

obnoxiis ea instituendos curavit. Id principium apud nos artis, qua

hodie Bohemi excellere putantur." In a preceding passage after the

count's name, Franz Anton, Graf von Sporken, are the words "anno

saeculi superioris octogesimo quum iter in externas provincias

suscepisset," &c. There is no reference here to the invention of the

horn in Paris or to the folding of the tube spirally, but only to the

manner of eliciting sound from the instrument. Count Sporken,

accustomed to the medieval hunting fanfares in which the tone of the

horn approximated to the blare of the trumpet, was merely struck by

the musical quality of the true horn tone elicited in Paris, and gave

France the credit of the so-called invention, which probably more

properly belonged to Italy. The account published by Prochaska a

hundred years after, without reference to the source from which it was

obtained, finds no corroboration from French sources. Had the French

really made any substantial improvement in the hunting-horn at the end

of the 17th century, transforming it from the primitive instrument

into an orchestral instrument, it would only be reasonable to expect

to find some evidence of this, considering the importance attached to

the art of music at the court of Louis XIV., whose musical

establishments, la Chapelle Musique,[42] la Musique de la Chambre du

Roi and la Musique de la Grande Ecurie, included the most brilliant

French artists. One would expect to find horns of that period by

French makers among the relics of musical instruments in the museums

of Europe. This does not seem to be the case. Moreover, in Diderot and

d'Alembert's _Encyclopedie_ (1767) the information given under the

heading _trompe ou cor de chasse grand et petit_ is very vague, and

contains no hint of any special merit due to France for any

improvement in construction. Among the plates (vol. v., pl. vii.) is

given an illustration of a horn very similar to the instruments made

in England and Germany nearly a century earlier, but with a

funnel-shaped mouthpiece. Dr Julius Ruhlmann states that there are two

horns by Raoux, bearing the date 1703,[43] in the Bavarian National

Museum in Munich,[44] but although fine examples, one in silver, the

other in brass (fig. 6) by Raoux, they turn out on inquiry[45] to bear

no date whatever. Ruhlmann's statement in the same article, that in

the arms of the family of Wartenberg-Kolb (now extinct), which goes

back to 1169, there is a hunting-horn coiled round in a complete

circle is also misleading. The horn (a post-horn) did not appear in

the arms of the family in question until 1699, when the first peer

Casimir Johann Friedrich was created hereditary Post-Master. The

influence of such erroneous statements in the work of noted writers is

far-reaching. Inquiries at the department of National Archives in

Paris concerning Raoux, the founder of the afterwards famous firm of

horn-makers whose model with pistons is used in the British military

bands and at Kneller Hall, proved fruitless. Fetis states that he

worked during the second half of the 18th century. Albert Chouquet[46]

states that he has seen a trumpet by Raoux, "seul ordinaire du Roy,

Place du Louvre" dated 1695. The inscriptions on the horns in question

are: For No. 105, a silver horn of the simplest form of construction

in D, "Fait a Paris par Raoux"; for No. 106, a brass horn engraved

with a crown on an ermine mantle with the initials C. A. (Carl

Albert), "Fait a Paris par Raoux, seul ordinaire du Roy, Place du

Louvre." Both horns measure across the coils 56 cm. and across the

bell 27(1/2). They are practically the same as the _cors de chasse_

now in use in French and Belgian military bands, the large diameter of

the coil enabling the performer to carry it over his shoulder. The

orchestral horn was given a narrower diameter in order to facilitate

its being held in front of the performer in a convenient position for

stopping the bell with the right hand. No. 107 in the same collection,

a horn of German construction, bears the inscription "Macht Jacob

Schmid in Nurnberg" and the trademark "J. S." with a bird. A horn in

E[flat]] of French make, having fleur-de-lys stamped on the rim of the

bell, and measuring only 15 in. across the coils to the exterior edge

of the bell--therefore a very small horn--is preserved in the Grand

Ducal Museum at Darmstadt.[47] A horn in F[sharp] (probably F in

modern high pitch), having the rim ornamented as above and the

inscription "Fait a Paris, Carlin, ordinaire du Roy," readily gives

the harmonics from the 3rd to the 12th.[48] The extreme width is 20

in.[49] Carlin, who lived at rue Croix des Petits Champs, died about

1780. The earliest dated horn extant is believed to be the one

preserved in the Hohenzollern Museum in Sigmaringen, "Machts Wilhelm

Haas, Nurnberg, 1688."[50] Another early German horn engraved "Machts

Heinr. Rich. Pfeiffer in Leipzig, 1697,"[51] formerly in Paul de Wit's

museum in Leipzig and now transferred with the rest of the collection

to Cologne, is of similar construction.

[Illustration: From a Photo by K. Teufel.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Home, Daniel" to "Hortensius, Quintus" Volume 13, Slice 6 · 第 45 / 58 题