Brice could not and would not pay his fine; and it has been asserted

that he was sent to prison. This, however, seems not to have been the

case. He retired into his own house, and remained there in voluntary

confinement for seven years; where he still continued to produce his

_Journal_. That of 27 February, 1730, contains some information about

him in a leading article. After alluding to “the vile Prosecution

commenced against” him “near Two Years and a Half since,” he thus

refers to the consequences of the action: “I’ve the sad Choice of

paying that other _Honourable Man_, my gentle Adversary above a Hundred

Pounds, go to Gaol (the Den of Legion Woe), or retire from and guard

against the horrid Catchpoles’ rapacious Clutches. The first none who

can’t instruct me honestly to get the Sum will, I presume, advise

me to comply with; the second I’ve a natural Antipathy against; and

therefore the latter, how much soever it may rub against the grain,

I’m forced to submit to.” Then follows the first announcement of a

poem he had composed during his retirement, entitled _Freedom_; and

this had appended to it a notice of another poem, “already printed, to

be published very soon,” entitled “/Behemoth/, or, The horrid

bloody Monster of St. Thomas’s (an Island scituate directly under the

Æquinoctial Line, between Guinea and Lower Æthiopia, subject to the

Portuguese).” This, of course, was another attack upon Glanvill, but

no copy of it is now known to exist.

Whilst preparing for the publication of _Freedom_ he lost his mother

and wife, and this delayed its issue.

Brice took advantage of every Sunday, a day on which debtors could not

be arrested, to walk abroad. Many attempts were made to seize him, but

all failed. He kept himself too close, and was too much on his guard.

On one occasion a bailiff named Spry disguised himself as a clergyman

and entered his office under pretence that he had got a book he desired

to have published by Brice; but that worthy did not allow himself to be

seen.

The profits from the sale of his poem on “Freedom” were said to have

been sufficiently large to enable him to compound with his creditors

and regain his liberty. After this he opened a printing press at Truro,

the first in Cornwall. But the venture did not succeed, and he soon

gave it up.

From the outset of his career Brice had exhibited a strong partiality

for the drama, and when players came to Exeter they were hospitably

received at his table.

In 1743, John Wesley visited Exeter for the second time, and preached

in the open air. He probably produced considerable effect, for some

time after this visit the local comedians were prosecuted as vagrants

and forced to give up their theatre in Waterbeer Street. Thereupon

the Methodists purchased it and converted it into a meeting-house.

Brice at once took up the cause of the players, and in 1745 published

a poem entitled “The Play-house Church, or new Actors of Devotion.”

In consequence of this, says the early biographer of Brice, “the mob

were so spirited up that the Methodists were soon obliged to abandon

the place to its former possessors, whom Mr. Brice now protected by

engaging them as his covenant-servants to perform gratis.”

All the playing fraternity who visited Exeter became acquainted with

Brice, and while valuing his hospitality and support, could not fail

to notice and be amused at his eccentricities. When Garrick produced

Colman’s play, _The Clandestine Marriage_, in 1766, Dr. Oliver says:

“There was some hesitation what tone would be most suitable to Lord

Ogleby--it was decided at last that Mr. King should assume Mr. A.

Brice’s.” The part, an important one, was originally intended for

Garrick: but on his declining it, Mr. King was requested to undertake

it. He at first hesitated, but finally consented, and made a great hit

with it. “Mr. King--as Lord Ogleby--seemed to give a relief and glow to

the character which was not intended by the author.”[31]

The character does not accord with what we know of Brice. Lord Ogleby

is a hypochondriac, a fop, an aged flirt, who leers at the ladies and

makes up his complexion. “I have rather too much of the lily this

morning in my complexion,” he says to his valet; “a faint tincture

of the rose will give a delicate spirit to my eyes for the day.”

He converses in French, he chirps out stanzas, whilst twinged with

rheumatism. “Love is the idol of my heart,” says the old fop, “and the

demon, interest, sinks before him.” But that there is a strong vein of

sarcasm in Lord Ogleby, there seems to be no element in the character

that agrees with that of Brice.

We now arrive at the production of the _Grand Gazetteer_, the work

upon which rests principally Brice’s claim to literary celebrity. Upon

it he expended much labour and money. “The very Books by us us’d in

the composition ... cost far above £100,” he says. It was issued in

forty-four shilling numbers, each consisting of thirty-two pages, and

was begun in 1751, and the last number appeared in 1755. This was one

of the earliest gazetteers published in England, and certainly the

most important. Writing fifty years after its completion, Dyer, the

Exeter bookseller, in 1805, termed it, at that date, “the best, the

most comprehensive, and even the most learned Gazetteer in the English

language”; but if we may trust Brice in the matter, he lost money on

the publication.

His last published work was an heroic-comic poem entitled _The Mobiad_,

being a description of an Exeter election “by Democritus Juvenal,

Moral Professor of Ridicule and plaguy-pleasant Fellow of Stingtickle

College; _vulgarly_ Andrew Brice.” London, 1770.

Dr. Brushfield has shown good reasons for attributing to Andrew

Brice, assisted by Benjamin Bowring, of Chumleigh, the composition of

_The Exmoor Scolding and Courtship_ that first appeared in Brice’s

_Journal_.[32]

Brice’s latter days were spent in strife with his nephew, Thomas Brice,

who was connected with the _Exeter Journal_, and with Mr. Andrews and

B. Trewman, who had been employed in his printing office, and who left

him and started a new paper on their own account, the _Exeter Mercury_.

He was a disappointed man in his family. He was twice married, but

both his wives, and all his children, died before him. He himself died

of general decay, at the age of eighty-three, on 7 November, 1773. In

his will he desired that he might be attended to his grave by his

brother masons of St. John’s Lodge. His remains were removed to the

Apollo Room, where during his lifetime he had often presided at masonic

gatherings, and there they were exposed for several days on show to

the public, who were charged a shilling a head to view them. The money

raised was to defray the expenses of his funeral.

On Sunday, 14 November, “the morrow of St. Brice’s day,” the interment

took place in St. Bartholomew’s churchyard. Two hundred members of

various lodges, in masonic costume, and with all their regalia,

together with several hundred of the inhabitants, walked in procession

from the New Inn to the grave. A funeral elegy, written by J. E.

Whitaker and set to music by J. E. Gaudry, was performed at the grave

to the accompaniment of orchestral music. No monumental stone marks the

spot where he lies, but the following epitaph, as suitable, is given by

Polwhele:--

Here lies Andrew Brice, the old Exeter printer,

Whose life lengthen’d out to the depth of its winter;

Of his brethren masonic he took his last leave,

Inviting them all to a lodge at his grave,

Who, to show their respect and obedience, came hither,

(Or rather, the mob and the masons together)

Sung a hymn to his praise in a funeral tone,

But disliking his lodging, return’d to their own.

Dr. Brushfield thus gives his appreciation of Andrew Brice: “The

character of Andrew Brice, although very pronounced, is by no means an

easy one to estimate or to describe. His natural good abilities, aided

by a good education, placed him in a position far above his compeers,

and we can well understand Polwhele’s remark on the Farleys being ‘no

match for the learning and abilities of Brice.’ That he possessed

literary talents of a high order is shown by his article on Exeter in

his _Gazetteer_. Of another order of composition, and as displaying

his versatility in a praiseworthy direction, some of his newspaper

articles may be mentioned. But, on the other hand, when excited by

political animosity or by private enmity, he appears to have thrown

off all restraint, and as he was a master in the arts of vituperation,

satire, and unscrupulous sneering, and coarse in his statements, we are

not surprised to learn that he was constantly embroiled in literary

and even in more active warfare. He was vigorous and thorough in all

that he did; a model of plodding perseverance, as the circumstances

of his early life have already demonstrated, a man of strong feelings

and powerful resentment. Testy, painfully sensitive, never forgetting

or forgiving an injury, and governed by strong impulses, whether for

good or for evil. And yet, like those of a large class, his faults were

far more patent to the world than were his virtues. His character was

antithetic, powerful in extremes. Although a good fighter, even when on

the losing side, he often acknowledged himself to be in the wrong. In

his daily life no one was kinder, displayed more hospitality, or was

more charitable--all these good qualities were especially exhibited

to his poorer relatives, as well as to the ‘poor players.’ Of him

Dr. Oliver reports ‘that he was a great favourite with his brother

Exonians; he ... was frank, humorous, and independent.’ He calls him

‘facetious,’ a point of character on which Andrew appeared to pride

himself, as he sometimes dubbed himself ‘Merry Andrew,’ at other times

‘Andrew, surnamed Merry.’ He certainly possessed strong individuality,

and was eccentric in speech, in manner, and dress.”

It often happens that what a man has done and least values is all that

remains of him to be really appreciated in after times. So was it

with Andrew Brice. His _Gazetteer_ has long been superseded. But his

_Exmoor Scolding and Courtship_, which he so little appreciated that

he did not care to acknowledge his part authorship, has been printed

and reprinted, and is valued to this day as one of the most important

dialect works in the English language, and the two were published as

a specimen of the folk-speech of the north-east of the county in 1879

by the English Dialect Society, edited by Mr. F. T. Elworthy. Of the

various authorities for the life of Andrew Brice it is unnecessary here

to speak; all have been superseded by the admirable monograph by Dr.

Brushfield in the _Transactions_ of the Devonshire Association, 1888.

He has been able to correct many errors into which earlier biographers

fell.

Several portraits of Brice exist, mainly line engravings. But the best

is a mezzotint engraved by Jehner and published in 1781.

DEVONSHIRE WRESTLERS

Wrestling was the favourite sport in former days in Devonshire and

Cornwall.

Evelyn, in his _Diary_, speaks of West-countrymen in London contesting

in London against men of the North, and in all cases the former

were the victors. And Ben Jonson, in his _Bartholomew Fair_, 1614,

introduces a Western wrestler, who performed before the Lord Mayor of

London.

If we may judge by _As You Like It_, wrestling in the Elizabethan

period was a murderous sport. Charles, the wrestler, plays with an old

man’s three sons. “The eldest of the three wrestled with Charles--which

Charles in a moment threw him, and broke three of his ribs, and there

is little hope of life in him, so he served the second, and so the

third.” When Le Beau laments that Rosalind and Celia had not seen the

sport, Touchstone wisely remarks, “Thus men grow wiser every day! It is

the first time that ever I heard breaking of ribs was sport for ladies.”

At Marytavy, in the churchyard, is the tombstone of John Hawkins,

blacksmith, 1721:--

Here buried were some years before,

His two wives and five children more:

One Thomas named, whose fate was such

To lose his life by wrestling much.

Which may a warning be to all

How they into such pastimes fall.

There is a Cornish ballad of a wrestling match between Will Trefry and

“Little Jan” that ends thus:--

Then with a desperate toss

Will showed the flying hoss,

And little Jan fell on the tan,

And never more he spake.

Oh! little Jan, alack!

The ladies say, O woe’s the day!

O little Jan, alack.

And it concludes with a verse stating that Little Jan was to have been

married that day.

Of the “flying hoss” or “flying mare” more presently. The wrestling

dress peculiar to the West Country consisted of breeches or trousers

and a wrestling jacket, the only part of the dress by which a hold,

or as it was technically called a _hitch_, could be got by the rules

of the play. The jacket was short and loose, made of untearable

linen stuff, and had short loose sleeves, reaching nearly to the

wrist. Wrestlers wore nothing else, except worsted stockings, and in

Devonshire shoes, soaked in bullock’s blood and baked at a fire, making

them hard as iron. Three men were appointed as _sticklers_ to watch the

players and act as umpires, and decide, in the case of a fall, whether

it was a _fair back_ or not. For a fair back both shoulders and one hip

must touch the ground at the same time, or both hips and one shoulder.

Such a fall was called a Threepoint Fall.

The men having stepped into the ring, shook hands, and then separated,

and the play began by trying for a hitch. This led to much dodging.

A player who gave his adversary a fall remained in the ring for the

next antagonist, and when he had given two falls he was reckoned as a

_standard_. Supposing there were twenty standards left in, the double

play would begin by the sticklers matching them with each other, and

ten would then be left for the treble play. The players would then

be reduced to five, then to three, and finally the two best would be

matched against one another.

The play in Devonshire and Cornwall was different in this, that in the

former county there was kicking, but this was not allowed above the

knee. In some cases skillibegs were worn in Devon, that is, haybands

wound about the calves and shins as a protection. In the Cornish play

there is hugging and heaving; in the Devonshire play, kicking and

tripping. It might be thus defined: in Cornwall, the shoulders and arms

were mainly relied on; in Devonshire, the legs.

A player, having got his hitch, would proceed to very close quarters,

and taking his man round the body, not lower than the waist, would

throw him over his shoulder, giving him the _Flying Mare_, and turning

him over on his back when falling, give him the Back Fall.

Besides the Flying Mare, there was the Cross-buttock fall in shoulder

play, the Back-heave, and others. In the leg play there were the

Fore-lock, the Back-lock, Heaving-toe, Back-heel, and others. The

Cornish player would, when he had secured his hitch, endeavour to drag

his man in for the hug and the fling; whereas the Devonshire man would

play for his hitch to keep him off, till he had disabled him.[33]

Sir Thomas Parkyns, about whom more in the sequel, thus describes the

cast of the Flying Mare: “Take him by the right hand with your left,

your palm being upwards as if you designed only to shake him by the

hand in a friendly manner in the beginning, and twist it outwards, and

lift it upwards to make way for your head, and put your head under

his left armpit, and hold his head stiff backwards, to hold him out of

his strength; then put your right arm up to the shoulder between his

grainings, and let your hand appear behind, past his breech; but if

you suspect they will cavil at that arm, as a breeching, lay your arm

across his belly, and lift him up as high as your head, and in either

hold, when so high, lean backwards and throw him over your head.”

Sir Thomas insists that a good wrestler must be temperate. “Whoever

would be a complete wrestler must avoid being overtaken in drink,

which very much enervates, or, being in a passion at the sight of his

adversary, or having received a fall, in such cases he is bereaved

of his senses; not being master of himself is less of his art, but

showeth too much play, or none at all, or either pulleth, kicketh, and

ventureth beyond all reason and his judgment when himself.”

Wrestling matches usually began at Whitsuntide, but were most in

practice at the period between the hay and corn harvests, when the

cereals were assuming a golden hue, and the orchards were bending under

their burden of fruit. There was hardly a village in the West that did

not offer a prize and enjoy the time-honoured spectacle of a game of

wrestling. The prize was either a silver-plated belt or a gold-laced

hat. The wearing of the latter was held to free the wearers from

liability to be pressed for the Navy.

The wrestling ground was laid with tan. At Moreton Hampstead the games

took place in the Sentry or Sanctuary field. At Sheepstor in the still

well-preserved Bull-ring, and the spectators sat on the churchyard wall

to watch the sport. At Liskeard, matches took place in the Ploy, or

Play-field from Lady Day to Michaelmas.

In the kicking, usual in Devonshire play, the wrestler about to

administer a kick had but one foot on the ground, and having an

off-hitch was liable to be thrown by a quick player with a trip or a

lock. The kick could be prevented by bending the knee so as to bring

the heel up to the buttock, and projecting it, when the knee caught the

administering player on the leg-bone above the knee with such force as

to paralyse it for a while, and it has even been known to break it.

This was entitled the _stop_.

Several of the Devonshire wrestlers became famous beyond the confines

of the county; and matches between Devonians and Cornishmen were not

uncommon; and the latter do not seem to have been at all afraid of

the kick, for by closing on their antagonists for the hug, they could

prevent them from kicking with toe or heel, at all events with full

force.

Thorne was a man of Widdecombe-on-the-Moor, a man of splendid build

and muscular development. He had made his name as a wrestler, when he

was induced to join the Life Guards, and in the battle of Waterloo

took part in the famous charge against the French cuirassiers; as he

was cutting down his tenth victim a shot laid him low, at the age of

twenty-three.

Then two young Devonian giants took the lead in the ring, Johnny Jordan

and Flower, each six feet high and weighing a trifle over eighteen

stone apiece. Jordan was a redoubted kicker, and the bravest wrestlers

shrank from challenging him. On one occasion Flower and Jordan were

opposed to one another, and after a struggle of seventeen minutes,

Flower gave way.

In 1816, Flower was confronted with Polkinghorne, a St. Columb

taverner, and the champion of Cornwall. The latter was too much

for Flower, and he was thrown amidst enthusiastic cheering and

hat-tossing and kerchief-waving of the Cornishmen.

[Illustration: _Drawn from Nature on the Stone by Geo. Rowe. Printed by

P. Simonau._

THE WRESTLING CHAMPION OF ENGLAND.

ABRAHAM CANN.

Who challenges all the World for 100 Sovereigns. Height 5 f^t 8-1/4.

Weight 12 Stone 7 lb Age 30. _Pub^d by Geo. Rowe N^n 38 Paris S^t Exeter

Aug^{st} 10^{th} 1826._]

Jackman, another Devonshire man, confronted Polkinghorne next day, and

he was cast over the head of the Cornubian, describing the “flying

mare.” William Wreford, at the age of eighteen, achieved reputation

by throwing Jordan over his head with such force that Jordan came

down with a “crash similar to that produced by felling an oak tree.”

But Wreford met his match in a wrestle with “the little Elephant,”

James Stone. Simultaneously the men grappled each other; and although

Wreford had the advantage at the outset, he was hurled into the

air, and fell with such violence on his back that for a time he was

incapacitated from taking part in a similar contest. Eventually the

return match came off at Southmolton, and Stone was again victorious.

Nevertheless Wreford remained a prominent figure in the ring, and threw

Francis Olver, a Cornishman, although he came out of the contest with

several of his ribs crushed by the deadly “hug.” But a greater than

Wreford and Jordan arose in the person of Abraham Cann. He was born in

December, 1794, and was the son of Robert Cann, a farmer and maltster

at Colebrook. His father had been a wrestler before him, and Abraham

inherited the old man’s skill, and learned by his experience, and soon

defeated Jordan, Flower, Wreford, Simon Webber, and other redoubtable

Devon champions. He was above the middle height as a man, with long

legs, and was endowed with surprising strength of limb. He was a

kicker. Abraham had a brother James, also a well-known wrestler, but he

did not acquire the celebrity of Abraham. In his later years he was an

under-gamekeeper, respected for his fearlessness when poachers were to

the fore.

There were other mighty men in the ring, as Bawden the Mole-catcher,

and Frost, of Aveton Gifford; but these were no match for Cann.

At Totnes, in 1825, Jordan had thrown a fine player, of the name of

Huxtable, in one minute, and the liveliest interest was felt in a match

that was to be played between him and Abraham Cann, who boasted that he

could kick to rags the legs of his antagonist in “vive minutes.”

When his turn arrived Cann awaited Jordan in the ring, upright,

undaunted, with a smile of conscious superiority on his face. Jordan

eyed the tall, athletic, and muscular form of Abraham, and withdrew

without trying for a hitch. This caused lively disappointment, and loud

cries of anger broke forth. But Jordan felt that he was not in good

form at the time. Two days later he was roughly handled by a young

Cornishman named Hook, and was too much injured to resume the contest.

On 21 September, 1826, at the Eagle Tavern, City Road, London, Cann

contended without shoes for the first prize with James Warren of

Redruth, and although the latter made a gallant struggle and Cann was

at a disadvantage playing without his proper and accustomed weapons,

the indurated boots, Abraham Cann came off the victor.

He now challenged Polkinghorne, the champion of Cornwall. James

Polkinghorne was 6 ft. 2 in. high, weighed 320 lb., and had not

wrestled for some years, but had carried on business as landlord of the

“Red Lion” in St. Columb Major. Cann was but 5 ft. 8-1/2 in. high, and

weighed 175 lb. This match was for £200 a side, for the best of three

back-falls; and it took place on Tamar Green, Morice Town, Plymouth,

on 23 October, 1826, in presence of 17,000 spectators. According to

some accounts, Abraham on this occasion was allowed only one shoe.

There had been much previous correspondence between the champions;

Polkinghorne had postponed meeting Cann as long as was possible.

Finally a meeting was arranged, as said, on the 23rd October, 1826.

Devonshire Characters and Strange Events · 第 35 / 59 段