“On the afternoon of Friday, 27 December, 1867, my mind was

unaccountably full of thoughts about her. I had been making some

purchases in Regent Street, and on my way home in a cab was wondering,

as I was driven through the crowd of vehicles, if I should ever see her

in her well-known carriage again, with its snuff-coloured ‘Petersham

brown’ body, the long brown coats, the silver hat cords of the coachman

and footman, the half-crescents of white leather which formed part of

the harness across the foreheads of the horses.

“On the following day I received the sorrowful news that Lady

Harrington was dead at the time I had thought so much of her, and that

I had lost a friendship for which Time can never lessen my gratitude.”

CARABOO

On Thursday evening, 3 April, 1817, the overseer of the parish of

Almondsbury, in Gloucestershire, called at Knole Park, the residence

of Samuel Worall, Esq., to inform him that a young female had entered

a cottage in the village, and had made signs to express her desire to

sleep there; but not understanding her language, the good folk of the

cottage communicated with the overseer, and he, as perplexed as the

cottagers, went for counsel to the magistrate. Mr. Worall ordered that

she should be brought to Knole, and presently the overseer returned

with a slim damsel, dressed poorly but quaintly, with a sort of turban

about her head, not precisely beautiful, but with very intelligent

speaking eyes.

Neither Mr. nor Mrs. Worall could make heads or tails of what she said.

He had a Greek valet who knew or could recognize most of the languages

spoken in the Levant, but he also was at fault; he could not catch a

single word of her speech that was familiar to him. By signs she was

questioned as to whether she had any papers, and she produced from her

pocket a bad sixpence and a few halfpence. Under her arm she carried

a small bundle containing some necessaries, and a piece of soap wound

up in a bit of linen. Her dress consisted of a black stuff gown with a

muslin frill round her neck, a black cotton shawl twisted about her

head, and a red and black shawl thrown over her shoulders, leather

shoes, and black worsted stockings.

The general impression produced from her person and manners was

favourable. Her head was small, her eyes black, hair also black; the

forehead was low, nose short, in complexion a brunette. The cheeks were

faintly tinged with red. The mouth was rather wide, teeth pearly white,

lips large and full, the underlip slightly projecting. The chin small

and round. Her height was 5 ft. 2 in. Her hands were clean and small

and well cared for. Obviously they had not been accustomed to labour.

She wore no ear-rings, but the marks of having worn them remained. Her

age appeared to be twenty-five.

After consultation, it was thought advisable to send her to the village

inn; and as Mrs. Worall was interested in her, she sent her own maid

and the footman to attend the stranger to the public-house, it being

late in the evening, and to request the landlady to give her a private

room and a comfortable bed.

The young woman seemed to be greatly fatigued and walked with

difficulty. When shown the room in which she was to sleep, she prepared

to lie down on the mat upon the floor; whereupon the landlady put her

own little girl into the bed, so as to explain its purport to her

guest. The stranger then undressed and went to bed.

Next morning Mrs. Worall went to the inn at seven o’clock and found her

sitting dejectedly by the fire. The clergyman of the parish had brought

some books of travel and illustrated geographies to show her, so that

she might give some clue as to whence she came. She manifested pleasure

at the pictures of China and the Chinese.

[Illustration: CARABOO PRINCESS OF JAVASU,

_alias MARY BAKER_.]

Mrs. Worall now took her to Knole, where by signs, pointing to herself

and uttering the word Caraboo, she explained to her hostess that this

was her name. At dinner she declined all animal food, and took nothing

to drink but water, showing marked disgust at beer, cyder, and meat.

Next day she was conveyed to Bristol and examined before the mayor

and magistrates, but nothing was made out concerning her, and she was

consigned to St. Peter’s Hospital for Vagrants.

There she remained till the ensuing Monday--three days--refusing food

of every description. On that day Mrs. Worall went into Bristol and

visited her at the hospital. The friendless situation of the foreign

lady had in the interim become public, and several gentlemen had called

upon her, bringing with them foreigners of their acquaintance, in the

hope of discovering who she was. Caraboo expressed lively delight at

seeing Mrs. Worall again, and that lady, deeply touched, removed her

from the hospital to the office of Mr. Worall, in Bristol, where she

remained for ten days under the care of the housekeeper.

Daily efforts were made to discover her language and country, but

without effect. At last a Portuguese of the name of Manuel Eynesso, who

happened to be in Bristol, had an interview, and he professed that he

was able to interpret what she said. The tale he revealed was that she

was a person of consequence in her own country, and had been decoyed

from an island in the East Indies, brought to England against her

wishes, and then deserted. He further added that her language was not a

pure dialect, but was a mixture of several tongues spoken in Sumatra.

On this Mrs. Worall removed Caraboo to Knole, and from 3 April to 6

June her hostess, the whole family, and the domestics treated her with

the utmost consideration and regard.

Among the visitors at Knole was a gentleman who had made many voyages

in the East Indies, and he took a lively interest in the girl, and

conversed with her, partly by word of mouth and partly--when at fault

for words--by signs.

It must have been an interesting sight, the travelled gentleman

interrogating Caraboo and taking notes of her reply, with an admiring

circle around of the family and visitors, wondering at his linguistic

acquirements and facility of speech in Oriental tongues. This traveller

committed to writing the following particulars obtained from Caraboo.

She was daughter of a person of high rank, of Chinese origin, by a

_Mandin_, or Malay woman, who was killed in war between the Boogoos

(cannibals) and the Mandins (Malays). Whilst walking in her garden at

Javasu attended by three _sammen_ (women), she was seized by pirates

commanded by a man named Chee-ming, bound hand and foot, her mouth

covered, and carried off. She herself in her struggles wounded two of

Chee-ming’s men with her creese; one of these died, the other recovered

by the assistance of a _justee_ (surgeon). After eleven days she was

sold to the captain of a brig called the _Tappa-Boo_. A month later

she arrived at a port, presumably Batavia, remained there two days,

and then started for England, which was reached in eleven weeks. In

consequence of ill-usage by the crew, she made her escape to shore. She

had had a dress of silk embroidered and interwoven with gold, but she

had been induced to exchange this with a woman in a cottage whose doors

were painted green, but the situation of which she could not describe.

The garments she now wore were those she had received from the cottager.

After wandering over the country for six weeks, she had arrived at

Almondsbury. She spoke of her mother’s teeth as artificially blackened

(i.e. by chewing betelnut); her face and arms were painted, and she

wore a jewel in her nose, and a gold chain from it was attached to her

left temple. Her father had three more wives, and he was usually borne

upon the shoulders of _macratoos_ (common men) in a palanquin.

She described the dress she wore at home. Seven peacock’s feathers

adorned the right side of her cap or turban. Upon being furnished with

calico, she made herself a dress in the style she had been accustomed

to. It was short in the skirt, the sleeves wide and long enough

to reach to the ground. A broad embroidered band passed round her

waist, and the fringe of the skirt, of the sleeves and the bosom, was

embroidered. She wore no stockings, and was furnished with sandals of

Roman fashion. She sometimes twisted her hair and rolled it up at the

top of her head and fastened it with a skewer.

During the ten weeks she resided at Knole and in Bristol, she was never

heard to pronounce a word or syllable that at all resembled a European

tongue. Mrs. Worall’s housekeeper, who slept with her, never heard on

any occasion any other language, any tone of voice other than those she

had employed when she first entered the house.

She was equally constant in her choice of food, and showed great nicety

as to her diet. She dressed everything herself, preferring rice to

anything else, did not care for bread, rejected meat, and drank only

water or tea. She refused a pigeon, which she called a _rampue_, that

had been dressed by the cook; but when given a bird that was alive,

she pulled off the head, poured the blood into the earth and covered it

up, then cooked the bird herself and ate it. This was the only animal

food she could be induced to touch, except fish, which she treated in

the same manner.

On every Tuesday she fasted rigidly, on which day she contrived to

ascend to the roof of the house, frequently at the imminent peril of

her life. Ablutions she was particularly fond of; she regularly knelt

by the pond in Knole Park and washed her face and hands in it.

After three weeks’ residence at Knole, she was one morning missing. But

she returned in the evening with a bundle of clothes, her shoes and

hands dirty. Then she fell seriously ill.

On Saturday, 6 June, she again took flight. She had not taken with

her a pin or needle or ribbon but what had been given to her. She

bent her way to Bath, and on the following Sunday, Mrs. Worall

received information of the place to which her protégée had flown. She

determined to reclaim her, and started for Bath, which she reached on

Sunday afternoon.

Here she found the Princess of Javasu, as she was called, at the

pinnacle of her glory, in the drawing-room of a lady of the _haut ton_,

one fair lady kneeling at her feet and taking her hand, and another

imploring to be allowed the honour of a kiss.

Dr. Wilkinson, of Bath, was completely bewildered when he visited

her, and wrote to the _Bath Chronicle_ a glowing account of Caraboo,

in full belief that she was all she pretended to be. “Nothing has yet

transpired to authorize the slightest suspicion of Caraboo, nor has

such ever been entertained except by those whose souls feel not the

spirit of benevolence, and wish to convert into ridicule that amiable

disposition in others.”

Dr. Wilkinson resolved on going to London to consult the Foreign

Office, and to obtain funds for the present relief of the Princess, and

her restoration to her native land.

Mrs. Worall left Bath, taking Caraboo with her. But the wide

circulation of the story led to her detection.

On the following Monday, a Mrs. Neale called on a Mr. Mortimer, and

urged him to go to Knole and tell Mrs. Worall that she knew the girl

very well, for she had lodged in her house in the suburbs of Bristol.

At the same time a youth arrived from Westbury, a wheelwright’s

son, who had met her upon her first expedition to Almondsbury, and

remembered seeing her at a public-house by the roadside, where a

gentleman, feeling compassion for her weariness, had taken her in and

treated her to beefsteak and hot rum and water.

Mrs. Worall was much disconcerted, but wisely said nothing to her guest

of what she had heard, and took Caraboo next day in her carriage to

Bristol under the plea that she was going to have Mr. Bird, the artist,

complete the portrait of the princess on which he was engaged, and

desired a final sitting. But instead of driving to Mr. Bird’s studio,

the princess was conveyed to the house of Mr. Mortimer, where she was

shown into a room by herself, whilst Mrs. Worall had an interview with

Mrs. Neale elsewhere. This lady was attended by her daughter, and

their story both surprised and confounded the kind magistrate’s wife.

After a protracted discussion, she returned to Caraboo, and told her

plainly that she was convinced that she was an impostor. When Caraboo

heard that Mrs. Neale had denounced her, she burst into tears and her

fortitude gave way. She made a few feeble attempts to keep up the

deception, but finally made a full confession.

Her name was Mary Baker. She was born at Witheridge in Devonshire in

1791, and had received no education, being of a wild disposition and

impatient of study. At the age of eight she was employed spinning wool

during the winter, and in summer she drove her father’s horses, weeded

the corn, etc. At the age of sixteen her father and mother procured a

situation for her at a farmhouse with a Mr. Moon, at Brushford, near

Witheridge. She remained there two years as nurse and general help, but

left because paid only tenpence a week, and she demanded that her wage

should be raised to a shilling, which Mr. Moon refused.

Her father and mother were highly incensed at her leaving, and treated

her so ill that she ran away from home and went to Exeter, where she

knew no one, but had a written character from her former mistress. She

was engaged by a shoemaker named Brooke at the wage of £8 per annum.

But she remained in this situation only two months. She spent her

wage on fine clothes, especially a white gown, and went home in it.

Her father was angry at seeing her dressed in white like a lady, and

peremptorily ordered her to take the gown off. She refused and left,

returned to Exeter, and went about begging. She wandered to Taunton

and thence to Bristol, begging from house to house. From Bristol she

made her way to London, where she fell ill with fever, and was taken

into St. Giles’s Hospital. There she enlisted the pity and sympathy

of a dissenting preacher, who, when she was well enough to leave,

recommended her to a Mrs. Matthews, 1 Clapham Road Place, and with her

she tarried for three years. Mrs. Matthews was very kind to her, and

taught her to read; but she was a strict woman, and of the straitest

sect of Calvinists. One day Mary heard that there was to be a Jews’

wedding in the synagogue near by, and she asked leave to be allowed

to witness it. Her mistress refused, but Mary was resolved not to be

debarred the spectacle, so she persuaded a servant in a neighbouring

house to write a letter to Mrs. Matthews, as if from a friend of hers,

to say that she was hourly expecting her confinement and was short of

domestics: would Mrs. Matthews lend her the aid of Mary Baker for a

while? Mrs. Matthews could not refuse the favour and sent Mary out of

the house, and Mary went to the synagogue and saw what was to be seen

there.

Meanwhile, Mrs. Matthews had sent to inquire how her dear friend was

getting through with her troubles, and expressed a hope that Mary had

been of assistance in the house. To her unbounded surprise, she learned

that the good lady was not in particular trouble just then, and that

she really did not comprehend what Mrs. Matthews meant about Mary’s

assistance. When Mary returned to the house, having seen the breaking

of the goblet and heard some psalm singing, she found that a storm was

lowering. Her mistress had sent for the dissenting minister to give it

hot and strong to the naughty girl. To escape this harangue Mary ran

away, wandered about the streets, and seeing a Magdalen Reformatory,

applied at the door for admission. “What! so young and so depraved!”

was the exclamation with which she was received. She was admitted and

remained in the institution some time, and was confirmed by the Bishop

of London. Then it was discovered that she had all along not been

qualified for admission, and was expelled.

She then exchanged her female garments for a boy’s suit at a Jew’s

pawnshop, and started to walk back to Devonshire, begging her way. On

Salisbury Plain she fell in with highwaymen, who offered to take her

into their company if she could fire a pistol. A pistol was put into

her hand, but when she pulled the trigger and it was discharged, she

screamed and threw the weapon down. Thereupon the highwaymen turned

her off, as a white-livered poltroon unfit for their service. She

made her way back to Witheridge to her father, and then went into

service at Crediton to a tanner, but left her place at the end of

three months, unable further to endure the tedium. Then she passed

through a succession of services, never staying in any situation longer

than three months, and found her way back to London. There, according

to her account, she married a foreign gentleman at a Roman Catholic

chapel, where the priest officiated to tie the knot. She accompanied

her husband to Brighton and thence to Dover, where he gave her the

slip, and she had not seen him or heard from him since. She returned

to London, was eventually confined, and placed her child in the

Foundling Institution; then took a situation not far off and visited

the child once a week till it died. After a while she again appeared

at Witheridge, but her reception was so far from cordial that she left

it and associated with gipsies, travelling about with them, telling

fortunes.

It was now, according to her account, that the idea entered her head of

playing the part of a distinguished stranger from the East, and when

she quitted the gipsies, she assumed that part--with what success we

have seen.

Mrs. Worall sent into Devon to ascertain what amount of truth was in

this story. It turned out that her father was named Willcocks, and was

a cobbler at Witheridge, and badly off. He confirmed Mary’s tale as far

as he knew it. She had had an illness when young, and had been odd,

restless, and flighty ever since; especially in spring and autumn did

she become most impatient and uncontrollable. He denied that he had

treated her cruelly, but he had taken the stick to her occasionally, as

she was specially aggravating by throwing up every situation obtained

for her after staying in it for but a short while.

[Illustration: MARY WILCOCKS, OF WITHERIDGE, DEVONSHIRE, ALIAS CARABOO

_Drawn and Engraved by N. Branwhite_]

Finally Mrs. Worall got her embarked on board a vessel, the _Robert and

Anne_, at Bristol, Captain Richardson, under her mother’s maiden name

of Burgess, for the United States, in the hopes that she might be able

to find a situation in Philadelphia.

The reason why she was entered in her mother’s name was to prevent her

from being overwhelmed by the visits and attentions of the curious.

As it was, the Earl of Cork and the Marquess of Salisbury obtained

interviews, got the girl to tell her story, speak her lingo, and

doubtless did not leave without having put gold into her palm.

She was certainly a remarkable character, with astounding

self-possession. Once or twice the housekeeper at Knole would rouse her

by some startling cry or call when she was asleep, but even then she

never passed out of her assumed character.

At Bath, the lady who had received her into her house proposed that a

collection should be made to defray her expenses in returning home to

Javasu. Bank-notes were thrown on the table, and some fell off on the

floor. Caraboo looked on with stolid indifference. If she picked one up

she replaced it on the table without glancing at the note to see how

much it was worth; in fact, she acted as if she did not understand that

bank-notes were other than valueless scraps of paper.

She was, moreover, insensible to flattery. A young gentleman seated

himself by her one day and said, “I think that you are the loveliest

creature I ever set eyes on!” She remained quite unmoved, not a

flutter of colour was in her cheek.

The Greek valet mistrusted her at first, but after a while was

completely won over to believe that she was a genuine Oriental

princess. She was entirely free from vicious propensities beyond that

of feigning to be what she was not. She never purloined anything; never

showed any token of wantonness. Vanity and the love of hoaxing people

were her prevailing passions; there was nothing worse behind.

So over the blue sea she passed to the West, and what became of her

there, whether there she gulled the Americans into believing her to be

an English countess or marchioness, is unknown.

Of one thing we may be pretty certain, that the gentleman who had

visited the Far East, and who pretended to understand her language and

thereby drew out her history, never again dared to show his face at

Knole.

The authority for this story is: “A narrative of a Singular Imposition

practiced ... by a young woman of the name of Mary Willcocks _alias_

Baker, ... _alias_ Caraboo, Princess of Javasu.” Published by Gutch,

of Bristol, in 1817. This contains two portraits, one by E. Bird,

/R.A./, the other a full-length sketch of her in her costume as

a princess.

JOHN ARSCOTT, OF TETCOTT

The family of Arscott, of Dunsland, is one of the most ancient in

the county. Its certified pedigree goes back to 1300, when they were

Arscotts, of Arscott, in the parish of Holsworthy. The elder branch

remained at Dunsland, one of the finest houses in North Devon, or

rather cluster of houses, for it consists of the early mansion of the

reign, at latest, of Henry VII, probably much earlier, of another

portion erected in the reign of James I, and of a stately more modern

mansion erected in the seventeenth century. Dunsland came into the

possession of the Arscotts through marriage with the heiress of Battyn

in 1522. In 1634 the heiress of Arscott married William Bickford, and

it remained in the Bickford family till 1790, when the heiress conveyed

it to her husband, William Holland Coham. In 1827 the heiress of Coham

conveyed Arscott and Dunsland to her husband, Captain Harvey Dickenson,

of the Madras Army, whose son now owns the estate and resides at

Dunsland.

So far the elder branch. The junior branch of Arscott was settled at

Tetcott in 1550, where it continued till 1783, when died John Arscott,

of Tetcott, the last of that stock, whereupon the Tetcott estate passed

to the Molesworths through the descendant of a great-aunt.

Tetcott House--the older--remains, turned into stables and residence

for coachmen and grooms. A stately new mansion was erected in the reign

of Queen Anne. But when the property passed to the Molesworths this was

pulled down, and all its contents dispersed. The family portraits, the

carved oak furniture, the china fell to the contractor who demolished

the mansion. But the park remains with its noble oak trees, and of this

more anon.

John Arscott, of Tetcott, was born in 1718 or 1719; he lived all his

life at the family mansion, and was a mighty hunter before the Lord.

On the presentation of Sir W. Molesworth, Bart., the Rev. Paul W.

Molesworth was presented to the living of Tetcott, and he, in 1855,

succeeded to the baronetcy.

In the register of Tetcott he made the following entry in Latin, which

is here given in translation:--

“Of the Rectors who preceded me I know almost nothing. John Holmes,

whose name appears first in the list of Rectors, was inducted by ‘Quare

impedit’--to use the legal term--in face of the Bishop’s objection. Of

this I was assured by the Rev. G. C. Gorham, who about the year 1848,

as the Bishop of Exeter--H. Phillpotts--refused to institute him to a

benefice on account of his unsoundness on Baptism, attempted to get

himself instituted compulsorily in the same manner.

“James Sanxay, whose name comes lower down in the list, was a man of

no small classical learning, as is proved by his editing a Lexicon of

Aristophanes.

“I have heard it said of him, that on the title page of a book he

added after his name the letters--O.T.D., and on being asked what

these signified, he replied: ‘I have noticed that most Authors, when

publishing their writings, have the greatest objection to their bare

name, always add something to it, such as--F.R.S., LL.D., M.A. So

to keep up the old custom, I myself have added O.T.D., that is--Of

Tetcott, Devon.’”

[Illustration: ARSCOTT OF TETCOTT

“The good old Squire! once more along the glen,

Oh, for the scenes of old! the former men!”

_R. S. Hawker_

_From the picture by J. Northcote. R.A._]

[Between the above and what follows a leaf has been cut out of the

register. Perhaps other rectors were told of on this missing leaf.]

“Of the ‘Lords’ who have held the manor of Tetcott in an unbroken line,

there are not many surviving memories.

“I have heard a story told by the old parishioners of one known as

‘The wicked Arscott,’ so named because he used to keep poor people

and beggars from his doors by big dogs. He still, they say, pays the

penalty of his cruelty in an old oak near the Church.

Devonshire Characters and Strange Events · 第 3 / 59 段