Among the many phenomena connected with the glacial deposits of this

country which have puzzled geologists there is none more remarkable

than the "intercrossing of erratics." The fact that such wandered

blocks have apparently crossed each other's tracks in their journeys

appears at first sight inexplicable on the assumption that their

transport has been effected by land-ice. The phenomena in question,

therefore, have always been appealed to by those who uphold the

iceberg origin of our boulder-clays, etc., as evidence decisively in

favour of their views. No one can deny that any degree and amount of

intercrossing might take place in the case of icebergs. We can readily

conceive how floating ice, detached from a long line of coast, might be

compelled by shifting winds and changing currents to tack about again

and again, so as to pursue the most devious course, and scatter their

stony burdens in the most erratic manner over the sea-bottom; while,

on the other hand, it is quite impossible to understand how a similar

irregular distribution of erratics could take place under one and the

same glacier flowing in a determinate direction. It is little wonder,

then, that the curious phenomena of the intercrossing of erratics

should have had much importance attached to it by the upholders of

the iceberg theory, seeing that all the other proofs which have been

adduced in favour of this theory have only served to demonstrate its

insufficiency. Upon the facts connected with the intercrossing of

erratics, the supporters of this time-honoured theory are now making

what I must believe is their last stand. I purpose therefore, in this

paper, to give a short outline of those facts, with the view of showing

that so far from being antagonistic to the land-ice theory, they are in

complete harmony with it; and indeed must be considered as affording an

additional demonstration of its truth.

Some years ago I called attention to the fact that in the middle

districts of Scotland the boulder-clay not infrequently contains a

curious commingling of northern and southern erratics.[R] I showed

that this was the case throughout a belt of country extending from the

sea-coast near Ayr, north-east to the valley of the Irvine, and thence

across the watershed into the Avon, and east to Lesmahagow, then down

the valley of the Clyde to Carluke, stretching away to the east by

Wilsontown, and thereafter continuing along the crest of the Pentlands

and the northern slopes of the Lammermuir Hills, by Reston and Ayton,

to the sea. "All along this line," I remarked, "we have a 'debatable

ground' of variable breadth, throughout which we find a commingling in

the till of stones which have come from north and from south. South of

it, characteristic Highland stones do not occur, and north of it stones

derived from the south are similarly absent." The explanation of these

facts is obvious. The belt of ground referred to was evidently the

meeting-place of the Highland and southern _mers de glace_. Here the

two opposing ice-flows coalesced and became deflected by their mutual

pressure to right and left--one great current going east and another

west. It is evident that the line of junction between the two _mers de

glace_ could not be rigorously maintained in one and the same position

during a period of glaciation, but would tend to oscillate backwards

and forwards, according as one or the other ice-sheet prevailed.

Sometimes the southern ice-sheet would be enabled to push back the

northern _mer de glace_, while at other times the converse would take

place. Nor is it necessary to suppose that the advance of one ice-sheet

was general along the whole line. On the contrary, it is most likely

that the movement was quite irregular--an ice-sheet advancing in some

places, while at other points its line of junction with the opposing

ice-sheet remained stationary, or even retrograded. Such movements

would obviously give rise to oscillations in the sub-glacial débris of

clay and stones; and thus we have a simple and natural explanation of

those intercrossings of erratics which are so characteristic of that

region which I have termed the "debatable ground." And this conclusion

is borne out by the fact that the glacial striæ of the same "debatable

ground" afford like evidence of oscillation in the trend of the

ice-flow.

[R] _Great Ice Age_, 2nd edit., p. 609.

Along the base of the Highland mountains in Forfarshire, etc., we

meet with similar intercrossings of erratics. Thus we occasionally

encounter in the boulder-clays overlying the Silurian regions erratics

of Old Red Sandstone rocks which have come from the east or south-east;

while the abundant presence of erratics of Silurian origin, on the

other hand, bespeak an ice-flow from the west towards the low-grounds.

In some places within the Silurian area we encounter a greyish-blue

boulder-clay containing Silurian fragments only, while in other places

within the same area the boulder-clay becomes reddish, and is charged

with many boulders of Old Red Sandstone rocks. Now the greyish-blue

till could only have been laid down by glacier-ice descending from

the Silurian high-grounds to Strathmore, while the red boulder-clay

points to a partial invasion of the Silurian regions by land-ice,

which had previously traversed the lower-lying Old Red Sandstone

areas. These apparently contradictory movements are readily accounted

for by the former presence in the area of the North Sea of the great

Scandinavian _mer de glace_. Dr. James Croll was the first to point out

that the glacial phenomena of Caithness and the Shetlands could only

be accounted for by the advance of the Scandinavian ice-sheet towards

our coasts, where it encountered and deflected the Scottish ice-sheet

out of its normal course--a sagacious induction, which the admirable

and exhaustive researches of my colleagues, Messrs. B. N. Peach and

J. Horne, have now firmly established. The lower blue boulder-clay

was evidently accumulated at a time when the Scottish ice was able

to flow more or less directly east or south-east towards what is now

the coast-line; while the overlying red boulder-clay points to a

subsequent period when the presence of the Scandinavian _mer de glace_

was sufficiently great to compel the Scottish ice out of its normal

course, and cause it to flow in a north-easterly direction. In doing

so it now and again passed from tracts of Old Red Sandstone to invade

the Silurian area, and thus an overlying red boulder-clay was here and

there accumulated upon the surface of a greyish-blue till in which not

a single fragment of any Old Red Sandstone rock occurs.

Recently Messrs. B. N. Peach and J. Horne, in a most instructive paper

on the "Glaciation of Caithness,"[S] have described some remarkable

comminglings of material which occur in a region where the glacial

striæ afford equally striking evidence of conflicting ice-movements.

These phenomena are developed here and there along a line which

indicates the meeting-place of two rival ice-streams, on each side

of which the boulder-clay presents different characteristics--the

one boulder-clay being the _moraine profonde_ of the ice that flowed

ENE. and NNE. towards the Caithness plain, while the other is an

accumulation formed underneath the ice that streamed across that plain

from SE. to NW. These phenomena are thus, as my colleagues remark,

quite analogous to those met with in the middle districts of Scotland,

as described by me, and referred to in a preceding paragraph. Now it

is obvious that while these examples of "intercrossings" of erratics

and "cross-hatching" of striæ all go strongly to support the land-ice

theory of the glacial phenomena, they at the same time negative the

notion of floating-ice having had anything to do with the production of

the phenomena under review.

[S] _Proceedings Royal Physical Society_, Edinburgh, 1881.

Before considering the evidence adduced by Mr. Mackintosh and others

as to the intercrossings of erratics in the drift-deposits of England,

I shall mention some of the more remarkable examples of the same

phenomena which have been noticed by continental geologists. The first

cases I shall cite are those which have been observed in the glacial

accumulations of the Rhone valley in eastern France. The land-ice

origin of these accumulations has never been called in question, and

as the intercrossings of erratics in that region are not only more

common, but much more striking and apparently inexplicable than any

which have been noticed elsewhere, it will be admitted that they of

themselves afford a strong presumption that the conflicting courses

followed by the erratics in certain regions of our own country are

the result rather of oscillations in the flow of land-ice than of the

random and eccentric action of icebergs. The researches of Swiss and

French glacialists have proved that during the climax of the Glacial

period an enormous area in the low-grounds of eastern France was

covered with a huge _mer de glace_, formed by the union of the great

Rhone glacier with the glaciers descending from the mountains of Savoy

and Dauphiny. A line drawn from Bourg by way of Chatillon, Villeneuve,

Trévoux, and Lyons to Vienne, and thence south-east by Beaurepaire to

the valley of the Isère, a few miles above St. Marcellin, indicates

roughly the furthest limits reached by the _mer de glace_. Over all

the low-grounds between that terminal line and the mountains are found

widespread sheets of boulder-clay and sand and gravel, together with

loose erratics. Now and again, too, well-marked terminal moraines make

their appearance, while the rock-surfaces, when these are visible and

capable of bearing and retaining glacial markings, present the usual

aspect of _roches moutonnées_. The same kinds of morainic materials

and ice-markings may of course be followed up into the valleys not

only of the Alps properly so-called, but also into those of the hills

of Bugey and the secondary mountain-chain of Savoy and Dauphiny. It

has indeed long been known that local glaciers formerly occupied the

mountain-valleys of Bugey. For example, a number of small glaciers have

descended from the slopes of the mountains west of Belley (such as Bois

de la Morgue, Bois de Lind, etc.) to the Rhone, and again from Mont du

Chat to the north-west. These glaciers were quite independent of the

greater ice-streams of the neighbouring Alps of Savoy, and the same was

the case with the glaciers of that mountainous tract which extends from

Nantua south to Culoz, between the valleys of the Ain and the Rhone.

From this elevated region many local glaciers descended, such as that

of the Valromey, which flowed for a distance of some twenty miles from

north to south. Again, similar local glaciers have left abundant traces

of their former presence throughout the mountainous belt of land that

stretches between Chambery and Grenoble to the west of the valley of

the Isère. The moraines of all those local glaciers, charged as they

are with the débris of the neighbouring heights, clearly indicate that

the local glaciers flowed each down its own particular valley. There

are certain other appearances, however, which seem at first sight to

contradict this view. Sometimes, for example, we encounter in the same

valleys erratics which do not belong to the drainage-system within

which they occur, but have without doubt been derived from the higher

Alps of Switzerland and Savoy. And the course followed by these foreign

erratics has crossed at all angles that which the local glaciers have

certainly pursued--occasionally, indeed, the one set of erratics has

travelled in a direction exactly opposed to the trend taken by the

others. As examples, I may cite the case of the erratics which occur

in Petit Bugey. In this district we encounter many locally-derived

erratics which have come from Mont du Chat to the west of the Lac

du Bourget--that is to say, they have travelled in a north-westerly

direction. But in the same neighbourhood are found many erratics of

Alpine origin which have been carried from north-east to south-west, or

at right angles to the course followed by the local erratics. Again,

in the valley of the Seran we have evidence in erratics and terminal

moraines of a local glacier which flowed south as far as the Lyons and

Geneva Railway, in the neighbourhood of which, a few miles to the west

of Culoz, its terminal moraines may be observed. This is the extinct

Glacier du Valromey of MM. Falsan and Chantre. Now it is especially

worthy of note that in the same valley we have distinct evidence of an

ice-flow from south to north--_i.e._, _up_ the valley. Erratics and

morainic materials which are unquestionably of Alpine origin have been

followed a long way up the Seran valley--for two-thirds of its length

at least. Before they could have entered that valley and approached the

slopes of Romey, they must have travelled down the valley of the Rhone

from the higher Alps of Savoy in a _south-west_ and _south_ direction

until they rounded the Montagne du Grand Colombier. It was only after

they had rounded this massive mountain-ridge that they could pursue

their course up the valley of the Seran, in a direction precisely

opposite to that which they had previously followed. These and many

similar and even more remarkable examples of the "intercrossings"

of streams of erratics are described by MM. Falsan and Chantre, and

graphically portrayed in their beautiful and instructive work on the

"Ancient Glaciers and Erratic Deposits of the Basin of the Rhone"; and

the explanation of the phenomena given by them is extremely simple

and convincing. The local erratics and moraines pertain partly to the

commencement and partly to the closing stage of the Glacial period.

Long before the south branch of the great glacier of the Rhone had

united with the glacier of the Arve, and this last with the glaciers

of Annecy and Beaufurt, and before these had become confluent with the

glacier of the Isère, etc., the secondary mountain-ranges of Savoy and

Dauphiny and the hills of Bugey were covered with very considerable

snow-fields, from which local glaciers descended all the valleys to the

low-ground. But when the vast ice-flows of Switzerland, Upper Savoy,

etc., at last became confluent, they completely overflowed many of the

hilly districts which had formerly supported independent snow-fields

and glaciers, and deposited their bottom-moraines over the morainic

débris of the local glaciers. In other cases, where the secondary

hill-ranges were too lofty to be completely drowned in the great _mer

de glace_, long tongues of ice dilated into the valleys, and compelled

the local ice out of its course; sometimes, as in the case of the

Valromey, forcing it backward up the valleys down which it formerly

flowed. But when once more the mighty _mer de glace_ was on the wane,

then the local glaciers came again into existence, and reoccupied

their old courses. And thus it is that in the hilly regions at the

base of the higher Alps, and even out upon the low-grounds and plains,

we encounter that remarkable commingling of erratics which has been

described above. Not infrequently, indeed, we find one set of moraines

superposed upon another, just as in the low-grounds of northern

Germany, etc., we may observe one boulder-clay overlying another, the

erratics in which give evidence of transport in different directions.

The observations recorded by MM. Falsan and Chantre, and their

colleagues, thus demonstrate that "intercrossings" of erratics of the

most pronounced character have been brought about solely by the action

of glaciers. In the case of the erratics and morainic accumulations of

the basin of the Rhone, the action of icebergs is entirely precluded.

I may now mention some of the more remarkable examples of

intercrossings of erratics which have been recorded from the glacial

accumulations of north Germany, etc. An examination of the glacial

striæ, _roches moutonnées_, and boulder-clays of Saxony leads to

the conviction, according to Credner, Penck, Torell, Helland, and

others, that the whole of that region has been invaded by the great

Scandinavian _mer de glace_ which flowed into Saxony from NNE. to SSW.

Erratics from southern Sweden and Gothland occur in the boulder-clay,

and the presence of these, taken in connection with the direction

of the glaciation, leaves us no alternative but to agree with the

conclusions arrived at by the Saxon geologists. But, apparently

in direct contradiction of this conclusion, we have evidence to

show that boulders of the same kinds of rock occur in Denmark and

Holland, pointing to a former ice-flow from north-east to south-west

and west. Thus boulders derived from Gothland occur at Gröningen

in Holland, while fragments from the island of Öland are met with

in Faxö; and erratics from the borders of the Gulf of Finland are

encountered at Hamburg. Indeed, when geologists come to examine the

erratics in north Germany and Poland generally, they find evidence of

apparently two ice-flows--one of which went south-south-west, south,

and south-east--spreading out, as it were, in a fan-shape towards the

southern limits reached by the great "Northern Drift,"--while the other

seems to have followed the course of the Baltic depression, overflowing

the low-grounds of northern Prussia, Holland, etc., in a south-west and

west direction. Now, it is quite evident that no one _mer de glace_

could have followed these various directions at one and the same time.

The explanation of the apparent anomaly, however, is not far to seek.

It is reasonable to infer that long before the _mer de glace_ had

attained its maximum dimensions, when as yet it was confined to the

basin of the Baltic and was only able to overflow the northern regions

of Prussia, etc., its course would be determined by the contour of the

pavement upon which it advanced. It would, therefore, be compelled

to follow the Baltic depression, and for a long time it would carry

erratics from Finland, the Baltic islands, and eastern Sweden in a

south-west and west-south-west direction. And this would continue to

be the direction even after a considerable portion of the low-grounds

of Prussia, etc., had been overflowed. But when the ice-sheet was

enabled to advance south into Saxony, Poland, and Lithuania, erratics

from Finland, the Baltic islands, etc., would necessarily cease to

travel towards the west, and hold on a south-south-east, south, and

south-south-west course. Again, when the _mer de glace_ was on the

decline, a time would return when the ice, as before, would be

controlled in its flow by the Baltic depression, and this would give

rise to a further distribution of erratics in a prevalent west-by-south

direction.[T]

[T] For a fuller discussion of the distribution of erratics on

the Continent, I may refer to Appendix, Note B, in _Prehistoric

Europe_, where the reader will find references to the literature of

this interesting subject. [Continental geologists now recognise a

distinct stage of the Ice Age, during which their "Upper Diluvium" was

deposited by a great glacier that occupied the basin of the Baltic.

This "Great Baltic Glacier" appears to have been contemporaneous with

the local ice-sheets and valley-glaciers of the Highlands and other

mountain-tracts of our island. See Article X. 1892.]

No one of late years has been more assiduous in the collection of facts

relating to the intercrossing of erratics in the drift-deposits of

England than Mr. D. Mackintosh.[U] He has written many instructive and

interesting descriptions of the phenomena in question, which he justly

thinks are of prime importance from a theoretical point of view. In a

recent paper[V] he presents us with the results of a systematic survey

of the direction and limits of dispersion of the erratics of the west

of England and east of Wales, which he evidently is of opinion afford

strong support to the iceberg theory, while at the same time they

are directly opposed to the theory of transport by land-ice. I have

attentively considered all the arguments advanced by Mr. Mackintosh in

favour of his views--the one upon which he apparently lays most stress

being that of the intercrossings of erratics observed by him--and I

shall now proceed to point out how the phenomena described by him are

most satisfactorily explained by the land-ice theory. They seem to

me, indeed, to lend additional support to that theory, in the same

manner as the intercrossings of boulders observed in Scotland, northern

Germany, etc., and sub-alpine regions of France. Mr. Mackintosh calls

attention to the fact that erratics of the well-known Criffel granite

are found scattered over a large part of the plain of Cumberland,

from which they extend south along the coast to near the mouth of the

estuary of the Duddon. They reappear on the coast in the neighbourhood

of Blackpool and Liverpool, and again at intervals on the coasts of

north Wales from Flint to Colwyn Bay, and thence to Penmaenmawr and

the neighbourhood of Beaumaris. They are dispersed over the peninsula

of Wirral and the Cheshire plain, etc., and they have been followed

south-east as far as the neighbourhood of Cardington, near Church

Stretton, Burton, Wolverhampton, Stafford, Hare Castle, Macclesfield,

and Manchester. This great stream of boulders, therefore, spreads

out to south-east, south, and south-west: the erratics, to quote

Mr. Mackintosh, "have radiated from an area much smaller than their

terminal breadth." The same is the case, I may remark in passing, with

erratics in the boulder-clays of Scotland, Scandinavia, north Germany,

etc., as also with those in the drift-deposits of the great Rhone

glacier and other ancient glaciers both on the north and south side of

the Alps. Now, the course followed by the Criffel erratics is crossed

at an acute angle by the path pursued by many boulders of Eskdale

granite, and various felspathic rocks derived from the Cumberland

mountains. For example, Cumberland erratics of the kinds mentioned

occur near St. Asaph and Moel-y-Tryfane and in Anglesey, and they

have been followed over a wide district in Cheshire, etc., extending

as far south as Church Stretton and Wolverhampton, and as far east as

Rochdale. More than this, we find that numerous erratics of felstone,

derived from the mountain of Great Arenig, in north Wales, have gone

to north-east as far as Halkin Mountain, in Flintshire, Eryrys, near

Llanarmon, and Chirk, from which last-named place they have been traced

in a south-easterly direction to Birmingham, Bromsgrove, etc. A glance

at the map of England will show that this south-easterly drift of

erratics crosses at an acute angle the paths followed by the Criffel

granite boulders and the erratics derived from Cumberland, so that we

have now several intercrossings to account for. How can this be done by

the land-ice theory?

[U] This enthusiastic geologist died in 1891.

[V] _Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc._, vol. xxxv. p. 425

The explanation seems to me obvious, for the phenomena are, after all,

less striking than similar appearances which have been observed in

Scotland, especially by my colleagues, Messrs. Peach and Horne, in

Caithness and the Orkney and Shetland Islands; and they are certainly

less intricate than the facts recorded by MM. Falsan and Chantre

concerning the intercrossing, interosculation, and direct opposition

of erratic paths in Savoy and Dauphiny. We have only to reflect that

the great _mer de glace_--to which, as I believe, all the English

phenomena are due--did not come into existence and attain its maximum

dimensions in the twinkling of an eye, nor could it afterwards have

disappeared in the same sudden manner. On the contrary, a period

of local glaciation must have preceded the appearance of the great

ice-sheet. At first, and for a long time, permanent snow would be

confined to the higher elevations of the land, and glaciers would

be limited to mountain-valleys; but as the temperature fell the

snow-line would gradually descend, until at last, probably after a

prolonged period, it reached what is now the sea-level. Thus the

formation of _névé_ and glacier-ice would eventually take place over

what are now our low-grounds, and other tracts also, which are now

submerged. It is quite impossible that the vast sheets of ice which

can be demonstrated to have covered Scotland, a large part of England,

Ireland, Scandinavia, and north Germany, and even the limited area of

the Faröe Islands, could possibly have been fed by the snow-fields of

mountain-heights only. The precipitation and accumulation of snow, and

the formation of _névé_ and glacier-ice, must have taken place over

enormous regions in what are now the temperate latitudes of Europe.

Fragments of Earth Lore: Sketches & Addresses Geological and Geographical · 第 17 / 37 段