ROMAN CATHOLIC EMANCIPATION.--DUKE OF WELLINGTON.--CORONATION OATH.

The Roman Catholic Emancipation Act--carried in the violent, and, in fact,

unprincipled manner it was--was in effect a Surinam toad;--and the Reform

Bill, the Dissenters' admission to the Universities, and the attack on the

Church, are so many toadlets, one after another detaching themselves from

their parent brute.

* * * * *

If you say there is nothing in the Romish religion, sincerely felt,

inconsistent with the duties of citizenship and allegiance to a territorial

Protestant sovereign, _cadit quæstio_. For if _that_ is once admitted,

there can be no answer to the argument from numbers. Certainly, if the

religion of the majority of the _people_ be innocuous to the interests of

the _nation_, the majority have a natural right to be trustees of the

nationalty--that property which is set apart for the nation's use, and

rescued from the gripe of private hands. But when I say--_for the nation's

use_.--I mean the very reverse of what the Radicals mean. They would

convert it to relieve taxation, which I call a private, personal, and

perishable use. A nation's uses are immortal.

* * * * *

How lamentable it is to hear the Duke of Wellington expressing himself

doubtingly on the abominable sophism that the Coronation Oath only binds

the King as the executive power--thereby making a Highgate oath of it. But

the Duke is conscious of the ready retort which his language and conduct on

the Emancipation Bill afford to his opponents. He is hampered by that

affair.

_June_ 20. 1834.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 239 / 270 题