MODERN POLITICAL ECONOMY.

What solemn humbug this modern political economy is! What is there true of

the little that is true in their dogmatic books, which is not a simple

deduction from the moral and religious _credenda_ and _agenda_ of any good

man, and with which we were not all previously acquainted, and upon which

every man of common sense instinctively acted? I know none. But what they

truly state, they do not truly understand in its ultimate grounds and

causes; and hence they have sometimes done more mischief by their half-

ignorant and half-sophistical reasonings about, and deductions from, well-

founded positions, than they could have done by the promulgation of

positive error. This particularly applies to their famous ratios of

increase between man and the means of his subsistence. Political economy,

at the highest, can never be a pure science. You may demonstrate that

certain properties inhere in the arch, which yet no bridge-builder _can_

ever reduce into brick and mortar; but an abstract conclusion in a matter

of political economy, the premisses of which neither exist now, nor ever

will exist within the range of the wildest imagination, is not a truth, but

a chimera--a practical falsehood. For there are no theorems in political

economy--but problems only. Certain things being actually so and so; the

question is, _how_ to _do_ so and so with them. Political _philosophy_,

indeed, points to ulterior ends, but even those ends are all practical; and

if you desert the conditions of reality, or of common probability, you may

show forth your eloquence or your fancy, but the utmost you can produce

will be a Utopia or Oceana.

You talk about making this article cheaper by reducing its price in the

market from 8_d_. to 6_d_. But suppose, in so doing, you have rendered your

country weaker against a foreign foe; suppose you have demoralized

thousands of your fellow-countrymen, and have sown discontent between one

class of society and another, your article is tolerably dear, I take it,

after all. Is not its real price enhanced to every Christian and patriot a

hundred-fold?

* * * * *

_All_ is an endless fleeting abstraction; _the whole_ is a reality.

_March_ 31. 1833.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 186 / 270 题