NINTH ARTICLE.--SIN AND SINS.--OLD DIVINES.--PREACHING EXTEMPORE.

"Very far gone," is _quam longissime_ in the Latin of the ninth article,--

as far gone as possible, that is, as was possible for _man_ to go; as far

as was compatible with his having any redeemable qualities left in him. To

talk of man's being _utterly_ lost to good, is absurd; for then he would be

a devil at once.

* * * * *

One mistake perpetually made by one of our unhappy parties in religion,--

and with a pernicious tendency to Antinomianism,--is to confound _sin_ with

_sins_. To tell a modest girl, the watchful nurse of an aged parent, that

she is full of _sins_ against God, is monstrous, and as shocking to reason

as it is unwarrantable by Scripture. But to tell her that she, and all men

and women, are of a sinful nature, and that, without Christ's redeeming

love and God's grace, she cannot be emancipated from its dominion, is true

and proper.[1]

[Footnote 1:

In a marginal scrap Mr. C. wrote:--"What are the essential doctrines of our

religion, if not sin and original sin, as the necessitating occasion, and

the redemption of sinners by the Incarnate Word as the substance of the

Christian dispensation? And can these be intelligently believed without

knowledge and steadfast meditation. By the unlearned, they may be worthily

received, but not by the unthinking and self-ignorant, Christian."--ED.]

* * * * *

No article of faith can be truly and duly preached without necessarily and

simultaneously infusing a deep sense of the indispensableness of a holy

life.

* * * * *

How pregnant with instruction, and with knowledge of all sorts, are the

sermons of our old divines! in this respect, as in so many others, how

different from the major part of modern discourses!

* * * * *

Every attempt, in a sermon, to cause emotion, except as the consequence of

an impression made on the reason, or the understanding, or the will, I hold

to be fanatical and sectarian.

* * * * *

No doubt preaching, in the proper sense of the word, is more effective than

reading; and, therefore, I would not prohibit it, but leave a liberty to

the clergyman who feels himself able to accomplish it. But, as things now

are, I am quite sure I prefer going to church to a pastor who reads his

discourse: for I never yet heard more than one preacher without book, who

did not forget his argument in three minutes' time; and fall into vague and

unprofitable declamation, and, generally, very coarse declamation too.

These preachers never progress; they eddy round and round. Sterility of

mind follows their ministry.

_January_ 20. 1833.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 176 / 270 题