THE TWO MODES OF POLITICAL ACTION.

There are many able and patriotic members in the House of Commons--Sir

Robert Inglis, Sir Robert Peel, and some others. But I grieve that they

never have the courage or the wisdom--I know not in which the failure is--

to take their stand upon duty, and to appeal to all men as men,--to the

Good and the True, which exist for _all_, and of which _all_ have an

apprehension. They always set to work--especially, his great eminence

considered, Sir Robert Peel--by addressing themselves to individual

interests; the measure will be injurious to the linen-drapers, or to the

bricklayers; or this clause will bear hard on bobbin-net or poplins, and

so forth. Whereas their adversaries--the demagogues--always work on the

opposite principle: they always appeal to men as men; and, as you know,

the most terrible convulsions in society have been wrought by such phrases

as _Rights of Man_, _Sovereignty of the People_, _&c_., which no one

understands, which apply to no one in particular, but to all in

general.[1]

The devil works precisely in the same way. He is a very clever fellow; I

have no acquaintance with him, but I respect his evident talents.

Consistent truth and goodness will assuredly in the end overcome every

thing; but inconsistent good can never be a match for consistent evil.

Alas! I look in vain for some wise and vigorous man to sound the word Duty

in the ears of this generation.

[Footnote 1:

"It is with nations as with individuals. In tranquil moods and peaceable

times we are quite _practical_; facts only, and cool common sense, are then

in fashion. But let the winds of passion swell, and straightway men begin

to generalize, to connect by remotest analogies, to express the most

universal positions of reason in the most glowing figures of fancy; in

short, to feel particular truths and mere facts as poor, cold, narrow, and

incommensurate with their feelings."--_Statesman's Manual_, p. 18.

"It seems a paradox only to the unthinking, and it is a fact that none but

the unread in history will deny, that, in periods of popular tumult and

innovation, the more abstract a notion is, the more readily has it been

found to combine, the closer has appeared its affinity, with the feelings

of a people, and with all their immediate impulses to action. At the

commencement of the French Revolution, in the remotest villages every

tongue was employed in echoing and enforcing the almost geometrical

abstractions of the physiocratic politicians and economists. The public

roads were crowded with armed enthusiasts, disputing on the inalienable

sovereignty of the people, the imprescriptible laws of the pure reason, and

the universal constitution, which, as rising out of the nature and rights

of man as man, all nations alike were under the obligation of adopting."--

_Statesman's Manual_.]

_August_ 24. 1831.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 115 / 270 题