ENGLAND.--HOLLAND AND BELGIUM.

I cannot contain my indignation at the conduct of our government towards

Holland. They have undoubtedly forgotten the true and well-recognized

policy of this country in regard to Portugal in permitting the war faction

in France to take possession of the Tagus, and to bully the Portuguese

upon so flimsy--indeed, false--a pretext[1] yet, in this instance,

something may be said for them.

Miguel is such a wretch, that I acknowledge a sort of morality in leaving

him to be cuffed and insulted; though, of course, this is a poor answer to

a statesman who alleges the interest and policy of the country. But, as to

the Dutch and King William: the first, as a nation, the most ancient ally,

the _alter idem_ of England, the best deserving of the cause of freedom

and religion and morality of any people in Europe; and the second, the

very best sovereign now in Christendom, with, perhaps, the single

exception of the excellent king of Sweden[2]--was ever any thing so mean

and cowardly as the behaviour of England!

The Five Powers have, throughout this conference, been actuated exclusively

by a selfish desire to preserve peace--I should rather say, to smother war

--at the expense of a most valuable but inferior power. They have over and

over again acknowledged the justice of the Dutch claims, and the absurdity

of the Belgian pretences; but as the Belgians were also as impudent as they

were iniquitous,--as they would not yield _their_ point, why then--that

peace may be preserved--the Dutch must yield theirs! A foreign prince comes

into Belgium, pending these negotiations, and takes an unqualified oath to

maintain the Belgian demands:--what could King William or the Dutch do, if

they ever thereafter meant to call themselves independent, but resist and

resent this outrage to the uttermost? It was a crisis in which every

consideration of state became inferior to the strong sense and duty of

national honour. When, indeed, the French appear in the field, King William

retires. "I now see," he may say, "that the powers of Europe are determined

to abet the Belgians. The justice of such a proceeding I leave to their

conscience and the decision of history. It is now no longer a question

whether I am tamely to submit to rebels and a usurper; it is no longer a

quarrel between Holland and Belgium: it is an alliance of all Europe

against Holland,--in which case I yield. I have no desire to sacrifice my

people."

[Footnote 1:

Meaning, principally, the whipping, so richly deserved, inflicted on a

Frenchman called Bonhomme, for committing a disgusting breach of

common decency in the cathedral of Coimbra, during divine service in

Passion Week.--ED.];

[Footnote 2:

"Every thing that I have heard or read of this sovereign has contributed

to the impression on my mind, that he is a good and a wise man, and worthy

to be the king of a virtuous people, the purest specimen of the Gothic

race."--_Church and State_, p. 125. n.--ED.]

* * * * *

When Leopold said that he was called to "_reign over_ four millions of

noble Belgians," I thought the phrase would have been more germane to the

matter, if he had said that he was called to "_rein in_ four million

restive asses."

_August_ 20. 1831.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 113 / 270 题