SIR T. MONRO.--SIR S. RAFFLES.--CANNING.

Sir Thomas Monro and Sir Stamford Raffles were both great men; but I

recognise more genius in the latter, though, I believe, the world says

otherwise.

* * * * *

I never found what I call an idea in any speech or writing of ----'s.

Those enormously prolix harangues are a proof of weakness in the higher

intellectual grasp. Canning had a sense of the beautiful and the good; ---

rarely speaks but to abuse, detract, and degrade. I confine myself to

institutions, of course, and do not mean personal detraction. In my

judgment, no man can rightly apprehend an abuse till he has first mastered

the idea of the use of an institution. How fine, for example, is the idea

of the unhired magistracy of England, taking in and linking together the

duke to the country gentleman in the primary distribution of justice, or

in the preservation of order and execution of law at least throughout the

country! Yet some men never seem to have thought of it for one moment, but

as connected with brewers, and barristers, and tyrannical Squire Westerns!

From what I saw of Homer, I thought him a superior man, in real

intellectual greatness.

* * * * *

Canning flashed such a light around the constitution, that it was difficult

to see the ruins of the fabric through it.

_May_ 12. 1830.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 55 / 270 题