Bull and Waterland are the classical writers on the Trinity.[1]

In the Trinity there is, 1. Ipseity. 2. Alterity. 3. Community. You may

express the formula thus:--

God, the absolute Will or Identity, = Prothesis. The Father = Thesis. The

Son = Antithesis. The Spirit = Synthesis.

[Footnote 1:

Mr. Coleridge's admiration of Bull and Waterland as high theologians was

very great. Bull he used to read in the Latin Defensio Fidei Nicaenae,

using the Jesuit Zola's edition of 1784, which, I think, he bought at Rome.

He told me once, that when he was reading a Protestant English Bishop's

work on the Trinity, in a copy edited by an Italian Jesuit in Italy, he

felt proud of the church of England, and in good humour with the church of

Rome.--ED.]

* * * * *

The author of the Athanasian Creed is unknown. It is, in my judgment,

heretical in the omission, or implicit denial, of the Filial subordination

in the Godhead, which is the doctrine of the Nicene Creed, and for which

Bull and Waterland have so fervently and triumphantly contended; and by not

holding to which, Sherlock staggered to and fro between Tritheism and

Sabellianism. This creed is also tautological, and, if not persecuting,

which I will not discuss, certainly containing harsh and ill-conceived

language.

* * * * *

How much I regret that so many religious persons of the present day think

it necessary to adopt a certain cant of manner and phraseology as a token

to each other. They must _improve_ this and that text, and they must do so

and so in a _prayerful_ way; and so on. Why not use common language? A

young lady the other day urged upon me that such and such feelings were the

_marrow_ of all religion; upon which I recommended her to try to walk to

London upon her marrow-bones only.

* * * * *

_July_ 9. 1827.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 33 / 270 题