The injunction, "Love one another," is as applicable to nations as to

individuals. It is one of the great laws of Heaven. And nations, like

individuals, may well measure their nearness to God and to his glory by

the conformity of their conduct to this duty.

* * * * *

In response to arguments founded on economy, the true nature of man,

and Christianity, I hear the skeptical note of some advocate of the

transmitted order of things, some one among the "fire-worshippers" of

War, saying, All this is beautiful, but visionary; it is in advance

of the age, which is not yet prepared for the great change. To such

I answer: Nothing can be beautiful that is not true; but all this is

true, and the time has come for its acceptance. Now is the dawning day,

and now the fitting hour.

The name of Washington is invoked as authority for a prejudice which

Economy, Human Nature, and Christianity repudiate. Mighty and reverend

as is his name, more mighty and more reverend is Truth. The words

of counsel which he gave were in accordance with the spirit of his

age,--which was not shocked by the slave-trade. But his great soul,

which loved virtue and inculcated justice and benevolence, frowns upon

those who would use his authority as an incentive to War. God forbid

that his sacred character should be profanely stretched, like the skin

of John Ziska, on a militia-drum, to arouse the martial ardor of the

American people!

The practice of Washington, during the eight years of his

administration, compared with that of the last eight years for which we

have the returns, may explain his real opinions. His condemnation of

the present wasteful system speaks to us from the following table.[103]

[103] Executive Document No. 15, Twenty-eighth Congress, First Session.

+----------------------+----------------+---------------+

| Years. | Military | Naval |

| | Establishment. | Establishment.|

+----------------------+----------------+---------------+

| 1789-91 | $835,618 | $570 |

| 1792 | 1,223,594 | 53! |

| 1793 | 1,237,620 | |

| 1794 | 2,733,539 | 61,409 |

| 1795 | 2,573,059 | 410,562 |

| 1796 | 1,474,672 | 274,784 |

| Total, during eight |} ----------- | -------- |

| years of Washington, |} $10,078,102 | $747,378 |

| | | |

| 1835 | $9,420,313 | $3,864,939 |

| 1836 | 19,667,166 | 5,807,718 |

| 1837 | 20,702,929 | 6,646,915 |

| 1838 | 20,557,473 | 6,131,581 |

| 1839 | 14,588,664 | 6,182,294 |

| 1840 | 12,030,624 | 6,113,897 |

| 1841 | 13,704,882 | 6,001,077 |

| 1842 | 9,188,469 | 8,397,243 |

| | | |

| Total, during eight |} ------------ | ----------- |

| recent years, |} $119,860,520 | $49,145,664 |

+----------------------+----------------+---------------+

Thus the expenditures for the national armaments under the sanction

of Washington were less than _eleven million_ dollars, while during

a recent similar period of eight years they amounted to upwards of

_one hundred and sixty-nine millions_,--an increase of nearly _fifteen

hundred per cent_! To him who quotes the precept of Washington I

commend the example. He must be strongly possessed by the martial mania

who will not confess, that, in this age, when the whole world is at

peace, and our national power is assured, _there is less need_ of these

Preparations than in an age convulsed with War, when our national power

was little respected. The only semblance of argument in their favor

is the increased wealth of the country; but the capacity to endure

taxation is no criterion of its justice, or even of its expediency.

Another fallacy is also invoked, that _whatever is is right_. A

barbarous practice is elevated above all those authorities by which

these Preparations are condemned. We are made to count principles

as nothing, because not yet recognized by nations. But they are

practically applied in the relations of individuals, towns, counties,

and states in our Union. _All these have disarmed._ It remains only

that they should be extended to the grander sphere of nations. Be it

our duty to proclaim the principles, whatever the practice. Through us

let Truth speak.

* * * * *

From the past and the present auspicious omens cheer us for the future.

The terrible wars of the French Revolution were the violent rending of

the body preceding the exorcism of the fiend. Since the morning stars

first sang together, the world has not witnessed a peace so harmonious

and enduring as that which now blesses the Christian nations. Great

questions, fraught with strife, and in another age heralds of War, are

now determined by Mediation or Arbitration. Great political movements,

which a few short years ago must have led to bloody encounter, are

now conducted by peaceful discussion. Literature, the press, and

innumerable societies, all join in the work of inculcating good-will

to man. The Spirit of Humanity pervades the best writings, whether the

elevated philosophical inquiries of the "Vestiges of the Creation," the

ingenious, but melancholy, moralizings of the "Story of a Feather," or

the overflowing raillery of "Punch." Nor can the breathing thought and

burning word of poet or orator have a higher inspiration. Genius is

never so Promethean as when it bears the heavenly fire to the hearths

of men.

In the last age, Dr. Johnson uttered the detestable sentiment, that

he liked "a good Hater." The man of this age will say that he likes

"a good Lover." Thus reversing the objects of regard, he follows a

higher wisdom and a purer religion than the renowned moralist knew.

He recognizes that peculiar Heaven-born sentiment, the Brotherhood of

Man, soon to become the decisive touchstone of human institutions. He

confesses the power of Love, destined to enter more and more into the

concerns of life. And as Love is more heavenly than Hate, so must its

influence redound more to the true glory of man and the approval of

God. A Christian poet--whose few verses bear him with unflagging wing

in immortal flight--has joined this sentiment with Prayer. Thus he

speaks, in words of uncommon pathos and power:--

"He prayeth well who loveth well

Both man and bird and beast.

"He prayeth best who loveth best

All things, both great and small;

For the dear God who loveth us,

He made and loveth all."[104]

[104] Coleridge, Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Part VII.

The ancient Law of Hate is yielding to the Law of Love. It is seen in

manifold labors of philanthropy and in missions of charity. It is seen

in institutions for the insane, the blind, the deaf, the dumb, the

poor, the outcast,--in generous efforts to relieve those who are in

prison,--in public schools, opening the gates of knowledge to all the

children of the land. It is seen in the diffusive amenities of social

life, and in the increasing fellowship of nations; also in the rising

opposition to Slavery and to War.

There are yet other special auguries of this great change,

auspicating, in the natural progress of man, the abandonment of all

international Preparations for War. To these I allude briefly, but with

a deep conviction of their significance.

Look at the Past, and see how War itself is changed, so that its

oldest "fire-worshipper" would hardly know it. At first nothing but

savagery, with disgusting rites, whether in the North American Indian

with Powhatan as chief, or the earlier Assyrian with Nebuchadnezzar as

king, but yielding gradually to the influence of civilization. With the

Greeks it was less savage, but always barbarous,--also with Rome always

barbarous. Too slowly Christianity exerted a humanizing power. Rabelais

relates how the friar Jean des Entommeures clubbed twelve thousand

and more enemies, "without mentioning women and children, which is

understood always." But this was War, as seen by that great genius in

his day. This can be no longer. Women and children are safe now. The

divine metamorphosis has begun.

Look again at the Past, and observe the _change in dress_. Down to a

period quite recent the sword was the indispensable companion of the

gentleman, wherever he appeared, whether in street or society; but he

would be deemed madman or bully who should wear it now. At an earlier

period the armor of complete steel was the habiliment of the knight.

From the picturesque sketch by Sir Walter Scott, in the "Lay of the

Last Minstrel," we learn the barbarous constraint of this custom.

"Ten of them were sheathed in steel,

With belted sword, and spur on heel;

They quitted not their harness bright,

Neither by day nor yet by night:

They lay down to rest

With corslet laced,

Pillowed on buckler cold and hard;

They carved at the meal

With gloves of steel,

And they drank the red wine through the helmet barred."

But all this is changed now.

Observe the _change in architecture and in domestic life_. Places

once chosen for castles or houses were savage, inaccessible retreats,

where the massive structure was reared to repel attack and to enclose

its inhabitants. Even monasteries and churches were fortified,

and girdled by towers, ramparts, and ditches,--while a child was

stationed as watchman, to observe what passed at a distance, and

announce the approach of an enemy. Homes of peaceful citizens in

towns were castellated, often without so much as an aperture for

light near the ground, but with loopholes through which the shafts

of the crossbow were aimed. The colored plates now so common, from

mediæval illustrations, especially of Froissart, exhibit these

_belligerent armaments_, always so burdensome. From a letter of

Margaret Paston, in the time of Henry the Sixth, of England, I draw

supplementary testimony. Addressing in dutiful phrase her "right

worshipful husband," she asks him to procure for her "some crossbows,

and wyndacs [grappling-irons] to bind them with, and quarrels [arrows

with square heads]," also "two or three short pole-axes to keep within

doors"; and she tells her absent lord of apparent preparations by a

neighbor,--"great ordnance within the house," "bars to bar the door

crosswise," and "wickets on every quarter of the house to shoot out at,

both with bows and with hand-guns."[105] Savages could hardly live in

greater distrust. Let now the Poet of Chivalry describe another scene:--

"Ten squires, ten yeomen, mail-clad men,

Waited the beck of the warders ten;

Thirty steeds, both fleet and wight,

Stood saddled in stable day and night,

Barbed with frontlet of steel, I trow,

And with Jedwood axe at saddle-bow;

A hundred more fed free in stall:

Such was the custom of Branksome Hall."

[105] Paston Letters, CXIII. (LXXVII. Vol. III. p. 315.)

This also is all changed now.

The principles causing this change are not only active still, but

increasing in activity; nor can they be confined to individuals.

Nations must soon declare them, and, abandoning martial habiliments and

fortifications, enter upon peaceful, _unarmed life_. With shame let it

be said, that they continue to live in the very relations of distrust

towards neighbors which shock us in the knights of Branksome Hall, and

in the house of Margaret Paston. They pillow themselves on "buckler

cold and hard," while their highest anxiety and largest expenditure

are for the accumulation of new munitions of War. The barbarism which

individuals have renounced nations still cherish. So doing, they take

counsel of the wild-boar in the fable, who whetted his tusks on a tree

of the forest when no enemy was near, saying, that in time of Peace he

must prepare for War. Has not the time come, when man, whom God created

in his own image, and to whom he gave the Heaven-directed countenance,

shall cease to look down to the beast for an example of conduct? Nay,

let me not dishonor the beasts by the comparison. The superior animals,

at least, prey not, like men, upon their own species. The kingly lion

turns from his brother lion; the ferocious tiger will not raven upon

his kindred tiger; the wild-boar of the forest does not glut his

sharpened tusks upon a kindred boar.

"Sed jam serpentum major concordia: parcit

Cognatis maculis similis fera: quando leoni

Fortior eripuit vitam leo? quo nemore unquam

Exspiravit aper majoris dentibus apri?

Indica tigris agit rabida cum tigride _pacem

Perpetuam_."[106]

[106] Juvenal, Sat. XV. 159-164.

To an early monarch of France just homage has been offered for effort

in the cause of Peace, particularly in abolishing the Trial by Battle.

To another monarch of France, in our own day, descendant of St. Louis,

and lover of Peace worthy of the illustrious lineage, Louis Philippe,

belongs the honest fame of first from the throne publishing the truth

that Peace is endangered by Preparations for War. "The sentiment, or

rather the principle," he says, in reply to an address from the London

Peace Convention in 1843, "that in Peace you must prepare for War,

_is one of difficulty and danger; for while we keep armies on land to

preserve peace, they are at the same time incentives and instruments

of war_. He rejoiced in all efforts to preserve peace, for that was

what all needed. He thought the time was coming when we should get

rid entirely of war in all civilized countries." This time has been

hailed by a generous voice from the Army itself, by a Marshal of

France,--Bugeaud, the Governor of Algiers,--who, at a public dinner

in Paris, gave as a toast these words of salutation to a new and

approaching era of happiness: "To the pacific union of the great human

family, by the association of individuals, nations, and races! To the

annihilation of War! To the transformation of destructive armies into

corps of industrious laborers, who will consecrate their lives to

the cultivation and embellishment of the world!" Be it our duty to

speed this consummation! And may other soldiers emulate the pacific

aspiration of this veteran chief, until _the trade of War_ ceases from

the earth![107]

[107] There was a moment when the aspiration of the French marshal

seemed fulfilled even in France, if we may credit the early Madame de

Lafayette, who, in the first sentence of her Memoirs, announces perfect

tranquillity, where "no other arms were known than instruments for the

cultivation of the earth and for building, and the troops were employed

on these things." Part of their work was to divert the waters of the

Eure, so that the fountains at Versailles should have a perpetual

supply: but this was better than War.--MADAME DE LAFAYETTE, _Mémoires

de la Cour de France pour les Années 1688 et 1689_, p. 1.

To William Penn belongs the distinction, destined to brighten as men

advance in virtue, of first in human history establishing the _Law

of Love_ as a rule of conduct in the intercourse of nations. While

recognizing the duty "to support power in reverence with the people,

and to secure the people from the abuse of power,"[108] as a great

end of government, he declined the superfluous protection of arms

against foreign force, and aimed to "reduce the savage nations by just

and gentle manners to the love of civil society and the Christian

religion." His serene countenance, as he stands with his followers in

what he called the sweet and clear air of Pennsylvania, all unarmed,

beneath the spreading elm, forming the great treaty of friendship with

the untutored Indians,--whose savage display fills the surrounding

forest as far as the eye can reach,--not to wrest their lands by

violence, but to obtain them by peaceful purchase,--is to my mind the

proudest picture in the history of our country. "The great God," said

the illustrious Quaker, in words of sincerity and truth addressed to

the Sachems, "hath written his law in our hearts, by which we are

taught and commanded to love and help and do good to one another. It

is not our custom to use hostile weapons against our fellow-creatures,

for which reason we come unarmed. Our object is not to do injury, but

to do good. We are now met on the broad pathway of good faith and good

will, so that no advantage is to be taken on either side, but all is

to be openness, brotherhood, and love, while all are to be treated as

of the same flesh and blood."[109] These are words of True Greatness.

"Without any carnal weapons," says one of his companions, "we entered

the land, and inhabited therein, as safe as if there had been thousands

of garrisons." What a sublime attestation! "This little State," says

Oldmixon, "subsisted in the midst of six Indian nations without so

much as a militia for its defence." A great man worthy of the mantle

of Penn, the venerable philanthropist, Clarkson, in his life of the

founder, pictures the people of Pennsylvania as armed, though without

arms,--strong, though without strength,--safe, without the ordinary

means of safety. According to him, the constable's staff was the only

instrument of authority for the greater part of a century; and never,

during the administration of Penn, or that of his proper successors,

was there a quarrel or a war.[110]

[108] Preface to Penn's Frame of Government of the Province of

Pennsylvania: Hazard's Register of Pennsylvania, Vol. I. p. 338. See

also Clarkson's Memoirs of Penn, Vol. I. p. 238, Philadelphia, 1814.

[109] Clarkson's Memoirs of Penn, Vol. I. Ch. 18.

[110] Ibid., Vol. II. Ch. 23.

Greater than the divinity that doth hedge a king is the divinity that

encompasses the righteous man and the righteous people. The flowers of

prosperity smiled in the footprints of William Penn. His people were

unmolested and happy, while (sad, but true contrast!) other colonies,

acting upon the policy of the world, building forts, and showing

themselves in arms, were harassed by perpetual alarm, and pierced by

the sharp arrows of savage war.

This pattern of a Christian commonwealth never fails to arrest the

admiration of all who contemplate its beauties. It drew an epigram of

eulogy from the caustic pen of Voltaire, and has been fondly painted by

sympathetic historians. Every ingenuous soul in our day offers willing

tribute to those graces of justice and humanity, by the side of which

contemporary life on this continent seems coarse and earthy.

Not to barren words can we confine ourselves in recognition of virtue.

While we see the right, and approve it too, we must dare to pursue it.

Now, in this age of civilization, surrounded by Christian nations, it

is easy to follow the successful example of William Penn encompassed

by savages. Recognizing those two transcendent ordinances of God, the

_Law of Right_ and the _Law of Love_,--twin suns which illumine the

moral universe,--why not aspire to the true glory, and, what is higher

than glory, the great good, of taking the lead in _the disarming of the

nations_? Let us abandon the system of Preparations for War in time

of Peace, as irrational, unchristian, vainly prodigal of expense, and

having a direct tendency to excite the evil against which it professes

to guard. Let the enormous means thus released from iron hands be

devoted to labors of beneficence. Our battlements shall be schools,

hospitals, colleges, and churches; our arsenals shall be libraries; our

navy shall be peaceful ships, on errands of perpetual commerce; our

army shall be the teachers of youth and the ministers of religion. This

is the cheap defence of nations. In such intrenchments what Christian

soul can be touched with fear? Angels of the Lord will throw over the

land an invisible, but impenetrable panoply:--

"Or if Virtue feeble were,

Heaven itself would stoop to her."[111]

[111] These are the concluding words of that most exquisite creation

of early genius, the "Comus." Beyond their intrinsic value, they have

authority from the circumstance that they were adopted by Milton as a

motto, and inscribed by him in an album at Geneva, while on his foreign

travels. This album is now in my hands. The truth thus embalmed by the

grandest poet of modern times is also illustrated in familiar words by

the most graceful poet of antiquity:--

"Integer vitæ scelerisque purus Non eget Mauris jaculis, neque arcu,

Nec venenatis gravida sagittis, Fusce, pharetra."

HOR., _Carm._ I. xxii. 1-4.

Dryden pictures the same in some of his most magical lines:--

"A milk-white hind, immortal and unchanged, Fed on the lawns, and in

the forest ranged; Without unspotted, innocent within, _She feared no

danger, for she knew no sin_."

_The Hind and the Panther_, Part I. 1-4.

At the thought of such a change, the imagination loses itself in

vain effort to follow the multitudinous streams of happiness which

gush forth from a thousand hills. Then shall the naked be clothed

and the hungry fed; institutions of science and learning shall crown

every hill-top; hospitals for the sick, and other retreats for the

unfortunate children of the world, for all who suffer in any way, in

mind, body, or estate, shall nestle in every valley; while the spires

of new churches leap exulting to the skies. The whole land shall

testify to the change. Art shall confess it in the new inspiration of

the canvas and the marble. The harp of the poet shall proclaim it in

a loftier rhyme. Above all, the heart of man shall bear witness to it,

in the elevation of his sentiments, in the expansion of his affections,

in his devotion to the highest truth, in his appreciation of true

greatness. The eagle of our country, without the terror of his beak,

and dropping the forceful thunderbolt from his pounces, shall soar,

with the olive of Peace, into untried realms of ether, nearer to the

sun.

* * * * *

I pause to review the field over which we have passed. We have beheld

War, sanctioned by International Law as a mode of determining _justice_

between nations, elevated into an _established custom_, defined and

guarded by a complex code known as the Laws of War; we have detected

its origin in an appeal, not to the moral and intellectual part of

man's nature, in which alone is Justice, but to that low part which

he has in common with the beast; we have contemplated its infinite

miseries to the human race; we have weighed its sufficiency as a

mode of determining justice between nations, and found that it is

a rude invocation to force, or a gigantic game of chance, in which

God's children are profanely treated as a pack of cards, while, in

unnatural wickedness, it is justly likened to the monstrous and impious

custom of Trial by Battle, which disgraced the Dark Ages,--thus

showing, that, in this day of boastful civilization, justice between

nations is determined by the same rules of barbarous, brutal

violence which once controlled the relations between individuals.

We have next considered the various prejudices by which War is

sustained, founded on a false belief in its necessity,--the practice

of nations, past and present,--the infidelity of the Christian

Church,--a mistaken sentiment of honor,--an exaggerated idea of the

duties of patriotism,--and finally, that monster prejudice which

draws its vampire life from the vast Preparations for War in time

of Peace;--especially dwelling, at this stage, upon the thriftless,

irrational, and unchristian character of these Preparations,--hailing

also the auguries of their overthrow,--and catching a vision of the

surpassing good that will be achieved, when the boundless means thus

barbarously employed are dedicated to works of Peace, opening the

serene path to that righteousness which exalteth a nation.

* * * * *

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 01 (of 20) · 第 9 / 28 段