CHAPTER I.

E-text prepared by Jonathan Ingram, Dainis Millers, and the Project

Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (https://www.pgdp.net/)

Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this

file which includes the original illustrations.

See 16600-h.htm or 16600-h.zip:

(https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/6/6/0/16600/16600-h/16600-h.htm)

or

(https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/6/6/0/16600/16600-h.zip)

CECIL RHODES

Man and Empire-Maker

by

PRINCESS CATHERINE RADZIWILL

(CATHERINE KOLB-DANVIN)

With Eight Photogravure Plates

Cassell & Company, Ltd

London, New York, Toronto and Melbourne

1918

[Illustration: THE RT. HON. CECIL RHODES]

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

1. CECIL RHODES AND SIR ALFRED MILNER 1

2. THE FOUNDATIONS OF FORTUNE 17

3. A COMPLEX PERSONALITY 28

4. MRS. VAN KOOPMAN 40

5. RHODES AND THE RAID 50

6. THE AFTERMATH OF THE RAID 69

7. RHODES AND THE AFRIKANDER BOND 82

8. THE INFLUENCE OF SIR ALFRED MILNER 104

9. THE OPENING OF THE NEW CENTURY 120

10. AN ESTIMATE OF SIR ALFRED MILNER 130

11. CROSS CURRENTS 144

12. THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS 157

13. THE PRISONERS' CAMPS 170

14. IN FLIGHT FROM THE RAND 191

15. DEALING WITH THE REFUGEES 202

16. UNDER MARTIAL LAW 214

CONCLUSION

INDEX

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

THE RT. HON. CECIL RHODES Frontispiece

Facing page

THE RT. HON. W.P. SCHREINER 32

PRESIDENT KRUGER 68

THE HON. J.H. HOFMEYR 86

THE RT. HON. SIR W.F. HELY-HUTCHINSON 98

VISCOUNT MILNER 132

THE RT. HON. SIR LEANDER STARR JAMESON 148

THE RT. HON. SIR JOHN GORDON SPRIGG 224

INTRODUCTION

The recent death of Sir Starr Jameson reminded the public of the South

African War, which was such an engrossing subject to the British public at

the close of the 'nineties and the first years of the present century. Yet

though it may seem quite out of date to reopen the question when so many

more important matters occupy attention, the relationship between South

Africa and England is no small matter. It has also had its influence on

actual events, if only by proving to the world the talent which Great

Britain has displayed in the administration of her vast Colonies and the

tact with which British statesmen have contrived to convert their foes of

the day before into friends, sincere, devoted and true.

No other country in the world could have achieved such a success as did

England in the complicated and singularly difficult task of making itself

popular among nations whose independence it had destroyed.

The secret of this wonderful performance lies principally in the care

which England has exercised to secure the welfare of the annexed

population, and to do nothing likely to keep them in remembrance of the

subordinate position into which they had been reduced. England never

crushes those whom it subdues. Its inbred talent for colonisation has

invariably led it along the right path in regard to its colonial

development. Even in cases where Britain made the weight of its rule

rather heavy for the people whom it had conquered, there still developed

among them a desire to remain federated to the British Empire, and also a

conviction that union, though it might be unpleasant to their personal

feelings and sympathies, was, after all, the best thing which could have

happened to them in regard to their material interests.

Prosperity has invariably attended British rule wherever it has found

scope to develop itself, and at the present hour British patriotism is far

more demonstrative in India, Australia or South Africa than it is in

England itself. The sentiments thus strongly expressed impart a certain

zealotism to their feelings, which constitutes a strong link with the

Mother Country. In any hour of national danger or calamity this trait

provides her with the enthusiastic help of her children from across the

seas.

The Englishman, generally quiet at home and even subdued in the presence

of strangers, is exuberant in the Colonies; he likes to shout his

patriotism upon every possible occasion, even when it would be better to

refrain. It is an aggressive patriotism which sometimes is quite uncouth

in its manifestations, but it is real patriotism, disinterested and devoid

of any mercenary or personal motives.

It is impossible to know what England is if one has not had the

opportunity of visiting her Dominions oversea. It is just as impossible to

judge of Englishmen when one has only seen them at home amid the comforts

of the easy and pleasant existence which one enjoys in Merrie England, and

only there. It is not the country Squires, whose homes are such a definite

feature of English life; nor the aristocratic members of the Peerage, with

their influence and their wealth; nor even the political men who sit in

St. Stephen's, who have spread abroad the fame and might and power of

England. But it is these modest pioneers of "nations yet to be" who, in

the wilds and deserts of South Africa, Australia and Asia, have

demonstrated the realities of English civilisation and the English spirit

of freedom.

In the hour of danger we have seen all these members of the great Mother

Country rush to its help. The spectacle has been an inspiring one, and in

the case of South Africa especially it has been unique, inasmuch as it has

been predicted far and wide that the memory of the Boer War would never

die out, and that loyalty to Great Britain would never be found in the

vast African veldt. Facts have belied this rash assertion, and the world

has seldom witnessed a more impressive vindication of the triumph of true

Imperialism than that presented by Generals Botha and Smuts. As the leader

of a whole nation, General Botha defended its independence against

aggression, yet became the faithful, devoted servant and the true adherent

of the people whom he had fought a few years before, putting at their

disposal the weight of his powerful personality and the strength of his

influence over his partisans and countrymen.

CATHERINE RADZIWILL.

_December, 1917._

CECIL RHODES

CHAPTER I.

CECIL RHODES AND SIR ALFRED MILNER

The conquest of South Africa is one of the most curious episodes in

English history. Begun through purely mercenary motives, it yet acquired a

character of grandeur which, as time went on, divested it of all sordid

and unworthy suspicions. South Africa has certainly been the land of

adventurers, and many of them found there either fame or disgrace,

unheard-of riches or the most abject poverty, power or humiliation. At the

same time the Colony has had amongst its rulers statesmen of unblemished

reputation and high honour, administrators of rare integrity, and men who

saw beyond the fleeting interests of the hour into the far more important

vista of the future.

When President Kruger was at its head the Transvaal Republic would have

crumbled under the intrigues of some of its own citizens. The lust for

riches which followed upon the discovery of the goldfields had, too, a

drastic effect. The Transvaal was bound to fall into the hands of someone,

and to be that Someone fell to the lot of England. This was a kindly throw

of Fate, because England alone could administer all the wealth of the

region without its becoming a danger, not only to the community at large,

but also to the Transvaalers.

That this is so can be proved by the eloquence of facts rather than by

words. It is sufficient to look upon what South Africa was twenty-five

years ago, and upon what it has become since under the protection of

British rule, to be convinced of the truth of my assertion. From a land of

perennial unrest and perpetual strife it has been transformed into a

prosperous and quiet colony, absorbed only in the thought of its economic

and commercial progress. Its population, which twenty years ago was

wasting its time and energy in useless wrangles, stands to-day united to

the Mother Country and absorbed by the sole thought of how best to prove

its devotion.

The Boer War has still some curious issues of which no notice has been

taken by the public at large. One of the principal, perhaps indeed the

most important of these, is that, though brought about by material

ambitions of certain people, it ended by being fought against these very

same people, and that its conclusion eliminated them from public life

instead of adding to their influence and their power. The result is

certainly a strange and an interesting one, but it is easily explained if

one takes into account the fact that once England as a nation--and not as

_the_ nation to which belonged the handful of adventurers through whose

intrigues the war was brought about--entered into the possession of the

Transvaal and organised the long-talked-of Union of South Africa, the

country started a normal existence free from the unhealthy symptoms which

had hindered its progress. It became a useful member of the vast British

Empire, as well as a prosperous country enjoying a good government, and

launched itself upon a career it could never have entered upon but for the

war. Destructive as it was, the Boer campaign was not a war of

annihilation. On the contrary, without it it would have been impossible

for the vast South African territories to become federated into a Union of

its own and at the same time to take her place as a member of another

Empire from which it derived its prosperity and its welfare. The grandeur

of England and the soundness of its leaders has never come out in a more

striking manner than in this conquest of South Africa--a blood-stained

conquest which has become a love match.

During the concluding years of last century the possibility of union was

seldom taken into consideration; few, indeed, were clever enough and wise

enough to find out that it was bound to take place as a natural

consequence of the South African War. The war cleared the air all over

South Africa. It crushed and destroyed all the suspicious, unhealthy

elements that had gathered around the gold mines of the Transvaal and the

diamond fields of Cape Colony. It dispersed the coterie of adventurers who

had hastened there with the intention of becoming rapidly rich at the

expense of the inhabitants of the country. A few men had succeeded in

building for themselves fortunes beyond the dreams of avarice, whilst the

majority contrived to live more or less well at the expense of those naïve

enough to trust to them in financial matters until the day when the war

arrived to put an end to their plunderings.

The struggle into which President Kruger was compelled to rush was

expected by some of the powerful intriguers in South Africa to result in

increasing the influence of certain of the millionaires, who up to the

time when the war broke out had ruled the Transvaal and indirectly the

Cape Colony by the strength and importance of their riches. Instead, it

weakened and then destroyed their power. Without the war South Africa

would have grown more wicked, and matters there were bound soon to come to

a crisis of some sort. The crux of the situation was whether this crisis

was going to be brought about by a few unscrupulous people for their own

benefit, or was to arise in consequence of the clever and far-seeing

policy of wise politicians.

Happily for England, and I shall even say happily for the world at large,

such a politician was found in the person of the then Sir Alfred Milner,

who worked unselfishly toward the grand aim his far-sighted Imperialism

saw in the distance.

History will give Viscount Milner--as he is to-day--the place which is due

to him. His is indeed a great figure; he was courageous enough, sincere

enough, and brave enough to give an account of the difficulties of the

task he had accepted. His experience of Colonial politics was principally

founded on what he had seen and studied when in Egypt and in India, which

was a questionable equipment in the entirely new areas he was called upon

to administer when he landed in Table Bay. Used to Eastern shrewdness and

Eastern duplicity, he had not had opportunity to fight against the

unscrupulousness of men who were neither born nor brought up in the

country, but who had grown to consider it as their own, and exploited its

resources not only to the utmost, but also to the detriment of the

principles of common honesty.

The reader must not take my words as signifying a sweeping condemnation of

the European population of South Africa. On the contrary, there existed in

that distant part of the world many men of great integrity, high

principles and unsullied honour who would never, under any condition

whatsoever, have lent themselves to mean or dishonest action; men who held

up high their national flag, and who gave the natives a splendid example

of all that an Englishman could do or perform when called upon to maintain

the reputation of his Mother Country abroad.

Some of the early English settlers have left great remembrance of their

useful activity in the matter of the colonisation of the new continent to

which they had emigrated, and their descendants, of whom I am happy to say

there are a great number, have not shown themselves in any way unworthy of

their forbears. South Africa has its statesmen and politicians who, having

been born there, understand perfectly well its necessities and its wants.

Unfortunately, for a time their voices were crushed by the new-comers who

had invaded the country, and who considered themselves better able than

anyone else to administer its affairs. They brought along with them fresh,

strange ambitions, unscrupulousness, determination to obtain power for the

furtherance of their personal aims, and a greed which the circumstances in

which they found themselves placed was bound to develop into something

even worse than a vice, because it made light of human life as well as of

human property.

In any judgment on South Africa one must never forget that, after all,

before the war did the work of a scavenger it was nothing else but a vast

mining camp, with all its terrifying moods, its abject defects, and its

indifference with regard to morals and to means. The first men who began

to exploit the riches of that vast territory contrived in a relatively

easy way to build up their fortunes upon a solid basis, but many of their

followers, eager to walk in their steps, found difficulties upon which

they had not reckoned or even thought about. In order to put them aside

they used whatever means lay in their power, without hesitation as to

whether these answered to the principles of honesty and

straightforwardness. Their ruthless conduct was so far advantageous to

their future schemes that it inspired disgust among those whose ancestors

had sought a prosperity founded on hard work and conscientious toil. These

good folk retired from the field, leaving it free to the adventurers who

were to give such a bad name to England and who boasted loudly that they

had been given full powers to do what they liked in the way of conquering

a continent which, but for them, would have been only too glad to place

itself under English protection and English rule. To these people, and to

these alone, were due all the antagonisms which at last brought about the

Boer War.

It was with these people that Sir Alfred Milner found himself out of

harmony; from the first moment that he had set his foot on African soil

they tried to put difficulties in his way, after they had convinced

themselves that he would never consent to lend himself to their schemes.

Lord Milner has never belonged to the class of men who allow themselves to

be influenced either by wealth or by the social position of anyone. He is

perhaps one of the best judges of humanity it has been my fortune to meet,

and though by no means an unkind judge, yet a very fair one. Intrigue is

repulsive to him, and unless I am very much mistaken I venture to affirm

that, in the 'nineties, because of the intrigues in which they indulged,

he grew to loathe some of the men with whom he was thrown into contact.

Yet he could not help seeing that these reckless speculators controlled

public opinion in South Africa, and his political instinct compelled him

to avail himself of their help, as without them he would not have been

able to arrive at a proper understanding of the entanglements and

complications of South African politics.

Previous to Sir Alfred's appointment as Governor of the Cape of Good Hope

the office had been filled by men who, though of undoubted integrity and

high standing, were yet unable to gauge the volume of intrigue with which

they had to cope from those who had already established an iron--or,

rather, golden--rule in South Africa.

Coteries of men whose sole aim was the amassing of quick fortunes were

virtual rulers of Cape Colony, with more power than the Government to whom

they simulated submission. All sorts of weird stories were in circulation.

One popular belief was that the mutiny of the Dutch in Cape Colony just

before the Boer War was at bottom due to the influence of money. This was

followed by a feeling that, but for the aggressive operations of the

outpost agents of certain commercial magnates, it would have been possible

for England to realise the Union of South Africa by peaceful means instead

of the bloody arbitrament of war.

In the minds of many Dutchmen--and Dutchmen who were sincerely patriotic

Transvaalers--the conviction was strong that the natural capabilities of

Boers did not lie in the direction of developing, as they could be, the

amazing wealth-producing resources of the Transvaal and of the Orange Free

State. By British help alone, such men believed, could their country hope

to thrive as it ought.

Here, then, was the nucleus around which the peaceful union of Boer and

English peoples in South Africa could be achieved without bloodshed.

Indeed, had Queen Victoria been represented at the Cape by Sir Alfred

Milner ten years before he was appointed Governor there, many things which

had a disastrous influence on the Dutch elements in South Africa would not

have occurred. The Jameson Raid would certainly not have been planned and

attempted. To this incident can be ascribed much of the strife and

unpleasantness which followed, by which was lost to the British Government

the chance, then fast ripening, of bringing about without difficulty a

reconciliation of Dutch and English all over South Africa. This

reconciliation would have been achieved through Cecil Rhodes, and would

have been a fitting crown to a great career.

At one time the most popular man from the Zambesi to Table Mountain, the

name of Cecil Rhodes was surrounded by that magic of personal power

without which it is hardly possible for any conqueror to obtain the

material or moral successes that give him a place in history; that win for

him the love, the respect, and sometimes the hatred, of his

contemporaries. Sir Alfred Milner would have known how to make the work of

Cecil Rhodes of permanent value to the British Empire. It was a thousand

pities that when Sir Alfred Milner took office in South Africa the

influence of Cecil Rhodes, at one time politically dominant, had so

materially shrunk as a definitive political factor.

Sir Alfred Milner found himself in the presence of a position already

compromised beyond redemption, and obliged to fight against evils which

ought never to have been allowed to develop. Even at that time, however,

it would have been possible for Sir Alfred Milner to find a way of

disposing of the various difficulties connected with English rule in South

Africa had he been properly seconded by Mr. Rhodes. Unfortunately for both

of them, their antagonism to each other, in their conception of what ought

or ought not to be done in political matters, was further aggravated by

intrigues which tended to keep Rhodes apart from the Queen's High

Commissioner in South Africa.

It would not at all have suited certain people had Sir Alfred contrived to

acquire a definite influence over Mr. Rhodes, and assuredly this would

have happened had the two men have been allowed unhindered to appreciate

the mental standard of each other. Mr. Rhodes was at heart a sincere

patriot, and it was sufficient to make an appeal to his feelings of

attachment to his Mother Country to cause him to look at things from that

point of view. Had there existed any real intimacy between Groote Schuur

and Government House at Cape Town, the whole course of South African

politics might have been very different.

Sir Alfred Milner arrived in Cape Town with a singularly free and unbiased

mind, determined not to allow other people's opinions to influence his

own, and also to use all the means at his disposal to uphold the authority

of the Queen without entering into conflict with anyone. He had heard a

deal about the enmity of English and Dutch, but though he perfectly well

realised its cause he had made up his mind to examine the situation for

himself. He was not one of those who thought that the raid alone was

responsible; he knew very well that this lamentable affair had only fanned

into an open blaze years-long smoulderings of discontent. The Raid had

been a consequence, not an isolated spontaneous act. Little by little over

a long span of years the ambitious and sordid overridings of various

restless, and too often reckless, adventurers had come to be considered as

representative of English rule, English opinions and, what was still more

unfortunate, England's personality as an Empire and as a nation.

On the other side of the matter, the Dutch--who were inconceivably

ignorant--thought their little domain the pivot of the world. Blind to

realities, they had no idea of the legitimate relative comparison between

the Transvaal and the British Empire, and so grew arrogantly oppressive in

their attitude towards British settlers and the powers at Cape Town.

All this naturally tinctured native feeling. Suspicion was fostered among

the tribes, guns and ammunition percolated through Boer channels, the

blacks viewed with disdain the friendly advances made by the British, and

the atmosphere was thick with mutual distrust. The knowledge that this was

the situation could not but impress painfully a delicate and proud mind,

and surely Lord Milner can be forgiven for the illusion which he at one

time undoubtedly cherished that he would be able to dispel this false

notion about his Mother Country that pervaded South Africa.

The Governor had not the least animosity against the Dutch, and at first

the Boers had no feeling that Sir Alfred was prejudiced against them. Such

a thought was drilled into their minds by subtle and cunning people who,

for their own avaricious ends, desired to estrange the High Commissioner

from the Afrikanders. Sir Alfred was represented as a tyrannical,

unscrupulous man, whose one aim in life was the destruction of every

vestige of Dutch independence, Dutch self-government and Dutch influence

in Africa. Those who thus maligned him applied themselves to make him

unpopular and to render his task so very uncongenial and unpleasant for

him that he would at last give it up of his own accord, or else become the

object of such violent hatreds that the Home Government would feel

compelled to recall him. Thus they would be rid of the presence of a

personage possessed of a sufficient energy to oppose them, and they would

no longer need to fear his observant eyes. Sir Alfred Milner saw himself

surrounded by all sorts of difficulties, and every attempt he made to

bring forward his own plans for the settlement of the South African

question crumbled to the ground almost before he could begin to work at

it. Small wonder, therefore, if he felt discouraged and began to form a

false opinion concerning the persons or the facts with whom he had to

deal. Those who might have helped him were constrained, without it being

his fault. Mr. Rhodes became persuaded that the new Governor of Cape

Colony had arrived there with preconceived notions in regard to himself.

He was led to believe that Milner's firm determination was to crush him;

that, moreover, he was jealous of him and of the work he had done in South

Africa.

Incredible as it appears, Rhodes believed this absurd fiction, and learned

to look upon Sir Alfred Milner as a natural enemy, desirous of thwarting

him at every step. The Bloemfontein Conference, at which the brilliant

qualities and the conciliating spirit of the new Governor of Cape Colony

were first made clearly manifest, was represented to Rhodes as a desire to

present him before the eyes of the Dutch as a negligible quantity in South

Africa. Rhodes was strangely susceptible and far too mindful of the

opinions of people of absolutely no importance. He fell into the snare,

and though he was careful to hide from the public his real feelings in

regard to Sir Alfred Milner, yet it was impossible for anyone who knew him

well not to perceive at once that he had made up his mind not to help the

High Commissioner. There is such a thing as damning praise, and Rhodes

poured a good deal of it on the head of Sir Alfred.

Fortunately, Sir Alfred was sufficiently conscious of the rectitude of his

intentions and far too superior to feelings of petty spite. He never

allowed himself to be troubled by these unpleasantnesses, but went on his

way without giving his enemies the pleasure of noticing the measure of

success which, unhappily, attended their campaign. He remained inflexible

in his conduct, and, disdaining any justification, went on doing what he

thought was right, and which was right, as events proved subsequently.

Although Milner had at last to give up, yet it is very largely due to him

that the South African Union was ultimately constituted, and that the

much-talked-of reconciliation of the Dutch and English in Cape Colony and

in the Transvaal became an accomplished fact. Had Sir Alfred been listened

to from the very beginning it might have taken place sooner, and perhaps

the Boer War altogether avoided.

It is a curious thing that England's colonising powers, which are so

remarkable, took such a long time to work their way in South Africa. At

least it would have been a curious thing if one did not remember that

among the first white men who arrived there Englishmen were much in the

minority. And of those Englishmen who were attracted by the enormous

mineral wealth which the country contained, a good proportion were not of

the best class of English colonists. Many a one who landed in Table Bay

was an adventurer, drawn thither by the wish to make or retrieve his

fortune. Few came, as did Rhodes, in search of health, and few, again,

were drawn thither by the pure love of adventure. In Australia, or in New

Zealand or other colonies, people arrived with the determination to begin

a new life and to create for themselves new ties, new occupations, new

duties, so as to leave to their children after them the result of their

labours. In South Africa it was seldom that emigrants were animated by the

desire to make their home in the solitudes of the vast and unexplored

veldt. Those who got rich there, though they may have built for themselves

splendid houses while they dwelt in the land, never looked upon South

Africa as home, but aspired to spend their quickly gained millions in

London and to forget all about Table Mountain or the shafts and factories

of Johannesburg and Kimberley.

To such men as these England was a pretext but never a symbol. Their

strange conception of patriotism jarred the most unpleasantly on the

straightforward nature of Sir Alfred Milner, who had very quickly

discerned the egotism that lay concealed beneath its cloak. He understood

what patriotism meant, what love for one's own country signified. He had

arrived in South Africa determined to spare neither his person nor his

strength in her service, and the man who was repeatedly accused both by

the Dutch and by the English party in the Colony of labouring under a

misconception of its real political situation was the one who had from the

very first appreciated it as it deserved, and had recognised its damning

as well as its redeeming points.

Sir Alfred meant South Africa to become a member of the British Empire, to

participate in its greatness, and to enjoy the benefits of its protection.

He had absolutely no idea of exasperating the feelings of the Dutch part

of its population. He had the best intentions in regard to President

Kruger himself, and there was one moment, just at the time of the

Bloemfontein Conference, when a _modus vivendi_ between President Kruger

and the Court of St. James's might have been established, notwithstanding

the difficult question of the Uitlanders. It was frustrated by none other

than these very Uitlanders, who, fondly believing that a war with England

would establish them as absolute masters in the Gold Fields, brought it

about, little realising that thereby was to be accomplished the one thing

which they dreaded--the firm, just and far-seeing rule of England over all

South Africa.

In a certain sense the Boer War was fought just as much against financiers

as against President Kruger. It put an end to the arrogance of both.

Cecil Rhodes, Man and Empire-Maker · 第 1 / 16 章