Plate I. Mohegan baskets (_a_ and _b_ painted). 49

“ II. Mohegan baskets (_a_, _b_, and _c_ painted). 51

“ III. Mohegan baskets. 53

a--Painted.

b--Shows bottom construction.

“ IV. Niantic and Mohegan baskets. 55

a--Mohegan washing basket,

b--Niantic storage basket made about 1840 by Mrs.

Mathews at Black Point (near Lyme, Conn.)

“ V. Mohegan carrying baskets. 57

“ VI. Mohegan baskets, fancy work baskets, and wall pocket. 59

“ VII. Tunxis baskets. Made by Pually Mossuck, a Tunxis

woman from Farmington, Conn., who died about

1890 at Mohegan. Lower left hand basket slightly

painted. 61

“ VIII. Scatticook baskets, made by Rachel Mawee, Abigail

Mawee, and Viney Carter, who died at Kent, Conn.

about 1895. 63

“ IX. Oneida stamped basket (Heye collection). 65

“ X. Mohegan and Niantic moccasins. 67

a--Mohegan moccasins.

b--Niantic moccasins from the old reservation at

Black Point, near Lyme, Conn.

“ XI. Mohegan and Niantic beaded bags (3 from the Heye

collection). 69

“ XII. Mohegan corn mortars and stone pestle. 71

“ XIII. Mohegan ladles and spoons. 73

Decorative Art of Indian Tribes of Connecticut.

A fortunate phase of the research work among the Indians of New England

has recently led to the extension of our knowledge of the decorative

art of the eastern Algonkin tribes. This has been made possible by the

discovery of specimens, and by information furnished by several aged

Indians of the Mohegan and Niantic tribes of eastern Connecticut.[1]

During several visits in the winter of 1912-13, Mrs. Henry Mathews

(Mercy Nonsuch), the only full-blooded survivor of the Niantic Indians,

formerly inhabiting the shore of Long Island sound around the mouth of

Niantic river, and the Mohegans, Cynthia Fowler, Charles Mathews, and

the late Fidelia Fielding, the last person who could speak the Mohegan

language, all contributed towards the material here presented.[2]

The principal field of decoration among the Mohegan and Niantic, so far

as we can now tell, seems to have been chiefly in paintings on baskets.

Decorative wood-carving upon household utensils and sometimes upon

implements was also quite common. Bead-work, on the other hand, appears

to have been a secondary activity. A short account of the basket-making

itself is required, before the basket decorations are described.

For household and gardening purposes these people have developed a

few types of baskets (_manu·´da_[3] “receptacle”) varying in shape,

size, and weave. The most characteristic forms seem to have been

rectangular baskets a foot or so in length, two-thirds as high, and of

proportionate width, and without handles, though often provided with

covers. These are the household storage articles (Plates I and II). For

carrying garden products, and for hand use in general, are somewhat

smaller round-bottomed baskets, with handles or bails, ranging in width

from 4 inches up to baskets with a capacity of half a bushel (Plates

III and V). Then we have the type known, among the Indians from Nova

Scotia to the Southern States, as “melon”, “rib”, or “gizzard” baskets

(Plate III, upper right hand corner), provided with bails, and also

used for carrying. And, lastly, there are the open work baskets, some

of which are small fancy articles, while others are used as strainers

(Plates IV and VI). These fall under the general type of open hexagonal

twill baskets. All these types, of course, are commonly found among

practically all the tribes of the Atlantic coast, varying only in the

minor details of weave at the rim and the bottom.

As to the materials, the Mohegan and Niantic, like the northern New

England tribes, used prepared splints of the brown ash. Next in

importance is the white oak. Here the pounding is unnecessary, the

splints being more easily freed from the log. Swamp maple is also

commonly used by the Mohegan basket-makers, although it is not as

durable as either the oak or the ash.

All these materials go through the same processes of preparation before

the splints are ready to be woven. The first stage in the process

consisted in pounding the ash log all over, and then separating the

layers of wood. Next, the lengths of splints were shaved smooth with a

spoke-shave, which looks like a European tool. Hand gauges were then

used to cut the splints into strips of uniform width. These gauges

(Figure 1), not unlike those of the Penobscots, were provided with

teeth made, in recent days, of clock springs; the width of the splint

depending upon the distance at which the teeth were set in the end

of the gauge. Another small implement, a sort of hand planer through

which the splint was drawn to make it finer, was also obtained at the

Mohegan village (Figure 2). The knives of the crooked type,

_bən·ī·´dwaŋg_ (Figure 3), used by the Mohegans for woodworking in

general, have a very pronounced curve, and are usually mounted on

wooden or sometimes buckhorn handles. While not necessarily used

directly in basket making, these knives are indispensable to the

Indian workman. A very old bone pointed tool, probably a punch (Figure

4), seems to have been used in some way, perhaps in weaving the basket

rims.

The ordinary weave among these tribes is the common checker-work.

The basket bottoms are of two kinds, rectangular and round. In the

rectangular bottoms the checker-work forms a foundation, the same

process continuing up the sides. In the round-bottomed forms the

splints are arranged like the spokes of a wheel crossing and radiating

from a centre. These splints turn upwards around the bottom, and

form the standards around which the side filling is woven, in the

under-one-over-one-process. Among the Mohegans a certain feature of

the round-bottomed types occurs which has not yet been found in other

tribes making similar baskets; that is, the broad flattened centre

standards of the bottom, appearing in Plate III, figure b. The ordinary

New England oak or maple hoops, one inside and the other outside, bound

down by a splint in the ordinary manner of wrapping, constitute the

rims of all the baskets. The second type of round baskets is called

“gizzard” basket by the Mohegans (Plate III, upper right hand corner).

These are generally made of oak, and their weave, although shown

plainly in the illustration, is almost impossible to describe.

The decorations upon baskets are produced in two ways, either by

running variously coloured splints into the weaving as fillers round

the sides, or by painting with pigment upon broad splints various

patterns extremely free in outline and quite independent of the

technique. It is with such painted designs that we have chiefly to

deal, because they perpetuate the native decorative art of these

Indians. The colours appearing upon the baskets are red (_skwa´yo_),

black (_sug·a´yo_), and indigo (_zi·wamba´yo_), the commonest being

red and black. The red is obtained by boiling down cranberries. The

black dye has now been forgotten, although some think that it was

either ‘snakeberries’ (or ‘poke-berries,’ termed _skuk_), or perhaps

huckleberries. In later times they have used either water colours or

blueing. The colours were applied by means of crude brushes, made by

fraying the end of a splinter of wood, or by using a stamp cut from a

potato, which is dipped into the colouring matter and then stamped on

the splints.

The designs themselves in the field of basketry decoration are

pre-eminently floral, the figures being highly conventionalized. The

main parts of the blossom are pictured. The corolla of the flower forms

the centre, surrounded by four petals, and commonly augmented by four

corner sprays apparently representing the calyx from underneath brought

into view. There is a fundamental similarity in these pseudo-realistic

representations occurring on all the different baskets, which shows

that this was the prevailing motive in this kind of decoration. The

corolla usually occupies the exposed surface of one splint, and the

four petals occupy the surrounding ones, as is shown in the natural

size illustration (Figure 5). The colours in this specimen are limited

to blue and red. Cynthia Fowler, a Mohegan informant, named the flower

the “blue gentian”; but how generally this name was used in former

times it is impossible to say. These flowers are usually found enclosed

within a larger diamond-shaped space, on one side of the basket,

the enclosing border consisting of a straight line or chain-like

line edged by dots. These dotted borders and the flower elements are

very characteristic of Mohegan and Niantic work. The corners of the

baskets from top to bottom also constitute another favourite field of

ornamentation. Here vertical alternating chain-like curves of several

types appear. Examples of the available designs of both sorts are shown

in Figures 6 to 14. The solid black in the sketches represents either

black or dark indigo of the actual design; the lined spaces represent

red.

Turning to the design reproductions (Figures 6, 7, 8, 9), we observe

a most consistent similarity in all those of the rosette type, to

wit, the conventional centre, the radiating petals, and the enclosing

diamond or four-curve, recurring with modifications in practically all

of such designs. Some are very handsome, a few rather colourless. The

dotting is very distinctive. Next are the line or border patterns,

which, although adapted to linear spaces, are characterized, like the

rosettes, by intertwined lines, dots, and petals. Frequently different

rosettes appear on each of the four sides of the same basket; and the

sides are also occasionally quartered diagonally by one of the border

or line patterns, and are thus divided into triangular areas, each

containing a rosette. Unfortunately none of the painted figures show in

the photographs, on account of their having become quite faint through

age and wear.[4]

In this whole series of conventional painted patterns a general

resemblance to northeastern Algonkin designs, as far north as the

Naskapi of Labrador, is very noticeable. It is, moreover, quite likely

that similar designs among the Narragansetts were referred to by Roger

Williams when he wrote, “They also commonly paint these (skin garments,

etc.) with varieties of formes and colours.”[5]

A further extension of the ubiquitous splint basketry of the New

England tribes, and the decorative work connected therewith, is

furnished by another Connecticut tribe--the Scatticook, of the

Housatonic river, near Kent. Their art is especially interesting,

because it has also just become extinct among their descendants here.

As a tribe the Scatticook (_Pisga´‛tiguk_, ‘At the fork of the river’)

were composed of exiled Pequots, Mohegans, and the remnants of western

Connecticut tribes who formed a new unit in their new home.[6] Their

type of culture was accordingly intermediate in some respects between

the eastern Connecticut tribes and those of the Hudson river.

To judge from a vocabulary which I obtained at Scatticook about ten

years ago, they had closer linguistic affinities with the Hudson River

(Delaware) group.

Until ten years ago the native art of basketry was preserved by the

Scatticooks, and some specimens were then collected during several

visits. It was found recently, in another visit to the tribe, that the

industry had become extinct; so our remarks are now based upon old

specimens and implements in the possession of the Indians. The general

character of Scatticook work is the same as that of the Mohegans.

Instead of the maple, however, the Scatticook used white oak or brown

ash. The method of preparing the splints was the same, as was also

the case with the types of weaving (Plate VIII). In the round-bottom

forms we notice the same flat radiating splints cut narrow at the

edge, as figured before in dealing with Mohegan work. The Scatticook

baskets are, as a whole, quite finely constructed of very thin

splints. One somewhat distinctive feature is found here, namely, the

very frequent use of the curlicue or roll as an ornamental feature.

The curlicue consists of a splint run over one of the warp splints

and twisted between two alternate standards, thus making a sort of

twisted imbrication. The Scatticook, considering the embellishment as

representing a shell, call it “a shell”; and they term the baskets with

this feature “shell-baskets” (Figures 15, 16, 17).

Three modifications of this ornamentation are shown in Figures 15, 16,

a and b; in Figure 16, a, the splint is twisted alternately between two

rows of warp at a different level; in Figure 15, the splint is curled

twice in a different direction, and forms a point; in Figure 16, b,

the splint is twisted once between two parallel rows of warp. This is

claimed by the Indians to be a native feature; and, since it is found

in the oldest baskets from the region, there seems little doubt that it

is aboriginal.

The Scatticook seem to have employed almost exclusively pokeberry juice

to stain the basket splints dark blue. In none of the specimens made

in recent times do we find the painting upon the splints, as is the

case among the Mohegans. The only record of this kind of work from the

Scatticook is found in an article by W. S. Curtis,[7] describing a

collection of old baskets obtained many years ago.

The gauges made by these people are somewhat distinctive (Figures

18 _a_ and _b_, and 19). One of their characteristics is that the

decorations are largely functional, the object in the maker’s mind

evidently having been to provide a firm grip for the operator and

at the same time to produce a decorative effect. This interesting

feature is noticeable in the few specimens that were discovered on the

reservation, and in several others in the possession of collectors.

They are all highly prized by their possessors. In one case there

seems to have been an attempt to portray a fish on the handle. Another

instrument, a knife used in shaving the splints, is shown in Figure 20.

While we may assume that some influence upon the art of the Connecticut

Indians resulted from contact with the Iroquois, there is nothing to

show that the former had such symbolic associations in their designs

as did the Iroquois.[8] The general similarity of the Connecticut

Indian decorations to those of both the Iroquois and the northeastern

Algonkins is really too ambiguous to permit a final decision as to

their affinities. Aware of these uncertainties, I feel, however, that

the evidence sustains the conclusion that the stamped and painted

designs are original to the southern New England Indians, and that they

spread from them to the Iroquois.

The occurrence of identical types of splint basketry and similar potato

stamp decorations among the Oneida (Plate IX) and Onondaga,[9] might

lead to the impression, were we to overlook resemblances with northern

Algonkin designs, of an Iroquoian origin for the whole technique. In

a recent visit, however, to the Cherokee of North Carolina, for the

purpose of tracing relationships between northern and southern art

motives, nothing was discovered comparable to these northern types

either in design or technique, although the eastern Cherokee are quite

conservative. This naturally leaves the art of the southern New England

tribes to be tentatively classified as a somewhat distinctive branch of

the northern and eastern Algonkin field, with some outside affinities.

From information and sketches furnished by Dr. J. Alden Mason, based on

studies and photographs which he made of New England baskets in the

C. P. Wilcomb collection, Oakland, Cal., it seems that similar stamped

splint baskets were found among the Indians as far as the Merrimac

River valley in southeastern New Hampshire. Specimens in the collection

referred to are supposed to have come from Union, Me., Lenox, Mass.,

Ipswich, Mass., and Herkimer, N.H. While not numerous enough to permit

of discussion, the specimens from this eastern extension of the stamped

or painted basket area show a type of design different from that of

our southern New England tribes. The patterns are less elaborate.

Although it is difficult to account for it, they seem to bear closer

resemblances to the designs on Oneida baskets.

North of the southern New England culture sub-area, which appears to

have terminated at the Merrimac river, splint basketry and painted

designs were replaced by the birch bark basketry and etched designs

characteristic of the art of the Wabanaki group.

A few examples of Mohegan and Niantic beadwork have survived the decay

of Indian culture in New England. These miscellaneous articles are

shown in Plates X and XI. They include moccasins, bags, and portions

of costume. Whether they have all been actually made by Mohegans is

not certain, except where indicated. One peculiarity of Mohegan art is

beadwork upon birch bark. A couple of very old specimens (Figure 21) of

this work have come to light. The foundation is the thin bark of the

white birch. The beadwork figures are practically all floral, though a

few geometrical designs occur; and realism appears as in the butterfly

representation. The floral designs seem to be somewhat related to those

found in the basket paintings, although they are not so aboriginal in

appearance. The beadwork designs are generally termed “forget-me-nots,”

“daisies,” “yellow daisies,” with buds, leaves, and stems. It should be

noted in this connexion that from the earliest time the Mohegans have

had some contact with Iroquois, especially the Mohawks, who from time

to time visited the Connecticut Indians in small parties. During the

early nineteenth century a number of the latter joined the Iroquois,

with whom an intermittent relationship has since been maintained. It

may be said in general, however, that the same type of floral beadwork

extends throughout the whole northeastern and Great Lakes area, in

which the Mohegan work may be included. Almost identical bags, for

example, both in form and design, come from the Mohegan, Penobscot,

Malecite, Montagnais, and Ojibwa.

In the carving of wooden utensils, such as bowls, spoons, mortars, and

miscellaneous articles, the Mohegans have shown considerable skill,

as appears from what few articles have survived among them. Some of

their bowls made from maple burls are exquisite. Several of these have

been described and illustrated by Mr. Willoughby in a recent paper,

the originals being in the Slater Memorial Museum, of Norwich. Wolf or

dog faces facing inward from projections upon the rim are very well

executed. Oftentimes such bowls were decorated by inserting wampum

beads into the wood, giving the outline and eateries of the face. These

bowls were used until a few generations ago for mixing native bread

known as johnny-cake.

Hardly inferior in workmanship to the bowls are the very distinctive

Mohegan mortars (_də´kwaŋg_, “pounder”) made

of a pepperidge log, and provided with long stone pestles (_gwu´nsnag_,

“long stone”). Three of these specimens, now in the Heye collection,

are shown in Plate XII. Practically all of the large mortars for

grinding corn in the household, among the Mohegans, were of this type.

Their sides were tapered toward the pedestal, and there were from two

to three handles on the sides near the bottom. Hollowed scallop work

ornamented the edge of the pedestal. The mortars average about 17

inches in height; and their cavity, narrowing towards the bottom, is

very deep. The stone pestle is 18 inches long. Until lately a few of

these heirlooms were cherished in several Mohegan families.

The use of wooden spoons and ladles (_giya´mən_) has not

been entirely abandoned by these Indians. The designs of most of the

forms are considered as aboriginal. They have rather broad oval--or

sometimes even circular--bowls, sometimes flat-bottomed bowls; and

the handles are of varying lengths, with rounded projections in the

under side to prevent the ladle from sliding down into the pot. This

favourite semi-decorative and functional feature also occurs in the

handles of gauges (Figure 1). The spoons are usually made of birch or

maple. One or two ornamentally carved specimens were found. One with a

dog’s head at the end of the handle, and the bowl set at an angle to

the handle, is in the Slater Museum. Another, recently obtained from

the Indians (Plate XIII), has two human faces, back to back, at the end

of the handle. The spoons range from 6 to 12 inches in length. Various

types are shown in Plate XIII.

Several articles of bone, ornamentally carved, have come to light.

Chief among these are whalebone canes, with skilfully made carvings.

The handle of one of these canes represents a very natural looking

human hand (Figure 22). This same figure has been met with in the

carvings of the Penobscot and Iroquois.

A few miscellaneous articles made by old Mohegan workmen have been

discovered during the investigation, one of which is covered with

decorative designs (Figure 23). No discussion is warranted, since any

possible interpretation has now been forgotten, even as to the function

of the object.

Strange as it may seem to find definitive material amid such

deculturated surroundings, there can be little doubt that these tribes

have preserved designs of considerable antiquity. Perhaps they belong

to an early type of eastern Algonkin art, consisting of curves,

circles, ovals, wavy lines and dottings forming floral complexes,

having a general distribution in the north and east, from which the

more elaborate realistic floral figures of beadwork have developed.

[Figure 1. Mohegan basket gauge.]

[Figure 2. Mohegan hand splint planer.]

[Figure 3. Mohegan crooked knives, with wood and antler handles.]

[Figure 4. Bone punch.]

[Figure 5. Typical basketry design of the Mohegans.]

[Figure 6. Mohegan and Niantic painted designs.

c, f, from specimen _b_, Pl. IV, Niantic.

a, d, from specimen _a_, Pl. III, Mohegan.

b, e, from specimen _b_, Pl. I, Mohegan.]

[Figure 7. Mohegan and Niantic painted designs.

a, from specimen _a_, Pl. III, Mohegan.

b, from specimen _b_, Pl. IV, Niantic.

c, e, from specimen _b_, Pl. I, Mohegan.

d, from specimen _a_, Pl. I, Mohegan.

f, from specimen _c_, Pl. II, Mohegan.]

[Figure 8. Mohegan and Niantic painted designs.

a, c, d, e, f, from specimen _b_, Pl. IV, Niantic.

b, from specimen _a_, Pl. III, Mohegan.]

[Figure 9. Mohegan painted designs.

a, c, from specimen _a_, Pl. III, Mohegan.

b, Mohegan.]

[Figure 10. Mohegan, Niantic, and Scatticook painted designs.

a, b, from specimen _a_, Pl. III, Mohegan.

c, e, f, g, h, i, k, from specimen _b_, Pl. IV, Niantic.

d, from specimen _a_, Pl. II, Mohegan.

j, from specimen _c_, Pl. II, Mohegan.

l, from Curtis, Scatticook.]

[Figure 11. Mohegan and Niantic painted designs.

a, from specimen _b_, Pl. I, Mohegan.

b, c, d, e, f, from specimen _b_, Pl. IV, Niantic.]

[Figure 12. Mohegan, Scatticook, and Niantic painted designs.

a, c, from specimen (Mohegan).

b, from specimen _a_, Pl. III, Mohegan.

d, f, from Curtis (Scatticook).

e, from specimen _b_, Pl. IV, Niantic.]

[Figure 13. Linear border designs from Mohegan painted baskets.]

[Figure 14. Body designs from Mohegan painted baskets;

_a_, on the top of the basket; _b_ on the sides.]

[Figure 15. The curlicue or roll, in Scatticook baskets.]

[Figure 16. The curlicue or roll, in Scatticook baskets.]

[Figure 17. Bottom of Scatticook basket, showing trimming of radial

splints.]

[Figure 18 (a). Scatticook gauge.]

[Figure 18 (b). Scatticook gauge.]

[Figure 19. Scatticook gauges.]

[Figure 20. Scatticook splint planer.]

[Figure 21. Mohegan beadwork on birch bark.]

[Figure 22. Carved bone hand.]

[Figure 23. Decorated Mohegan wooden object.]

/Explanation of Plate I./

Mohegan baskets (_a_ and _b_ painted.)

[/Plate I./]

/Explanation of Plate II./

Mohegan baskets (_a_, _b_, and _c_ painted.)

[/Plate II./]

/Explanation of Plate III./

Mohegan baskets.

a--Painted.

b--Shows bottom construction.

[/Plate III./]

/Explanation of Plate IV./

Niantic and Mohegan baskets.

a--Mohegan washing basket.

b--Niantic storage basket made about 1840 by Mrs. Mathews at Black

Point (near Lyme, Conn.)

[/Plate IV./]

/Explanation of Plate V./

Mohegan carrying baskets.

[/Plate V./]

/Explanation of Plate VI./

Mohegan baskets, fancy work baskets, and wall pocket.

[/Plate VI./]

/Explanation of Plate VII./

Tunxis baskets. Made by Pually Mossuck, a Tunxis woman from Farmington,

Conn., who died about 1890 at Mohegan. Lower left hand basket slightly

painted.

[/Plate VII./]

/Explanation of Plate VIII./

Scatticook baskets, made by Rachel Mawee, Abigail Mawee, and Viney

Carter, who died at Kent, Conn., about 1895.

[/Plate VIII./]

/Explanation of Plate IX./

Oneida stamped basket (Heye collection.)

[/Plate IX./]

/Explanation of Plate X./

Mohegan and Niantic moccasins.

a--Mohegan moccasins.

b--Niantic moccasins from the old reservation at Black Point, near

Lyme, Conn.

[/Plate X./]

/Explanation of Plate XI./

Mohegan and Niantic beaded bags (3 from the Heye collection.)

[/Plate XI./]

/Explanation of Plate XII./

Mohegan corn mortars and stone pestle.

[/Plate XII./]

/Explanation of Plate XIII./

Mohegan ladles and spoons.

[/Plate XIII./]

Decorative Art of Indian Tribes of Connecticut · 第 5 / 6 题