CHAPTER XIV.

The Fever Act--Central Board of Health--Fever Hospitals--Changes in

the Act--Outdoor Attendance--Interment of the Dead--The Fever in

1846--Cork

Workhouse--Clonmel--Tyrone--Newry--Sligo--Leitrim--Roscommon--Galway--

Fever in 1847--Belfast--Death-rate in the

Workhouses--Swinford--Cork--Dropsy--Carrick-on-Shannon--Macroom--

Bantry Abbey--Dublin--Cork Street Hospital--Applications for Temporary

Hospital accommodation--Relapse a remarkable feature--Number of

cases received--Percentage of Mortality--Weekly Cost of

Patients--Imperfect Returns--Scurvy--The cause of

it--Emigration--Earlier Schemes of Emigration--Mr. Wilmot

Horton--Present Stats of Peterborough (_Note_)--Various

Parliamentary Committees on Emigration--Their Views--The Devon

Commission--Its Views of Emigration--A Parliamentary Committee

opposed to Emigration--Statistics of Emigration--Gigantic Emigration

Scheme--Mr. Godley--Statement to the Premier--The Joint Stock

Company for Emigration--£9,000,000 required--How to be applied--It

was to be a Catholic Emigration--Mr. Godley's Scheme--Not accepted

by the Government--Who signed it--Names (_Note_)--Dr. Maginn on the

Emigration Scheme--Emigration to be left to itself--Statistics of

Population--The Census of 1841--Deaths from the Famine--Deaths

amongst Emigrants--Deaths amongst those who went to

Canada--Emigration to the United States--Commission to protect

Emigrants--Revelations--Mortality on board Emigrant Ships--Plunder

of Emigrants--Committee of Inquiry--Its Report--Frauds about Passage

Tickets--Evidence--How did any survive?--Remittances from

Emigrants--Unprecedented--A proof of their industry and

perseverance.

In anticipation of fever and other epidemics resulting from the Famine,

a Fever Act was passed for Ireland in the early part of the Session of

1846, by which the Lord Lieutenant was empowered to appoint

Commissioners of Health, not exceeding five in number, who were to act

without salaries. They constituted what was called the Central Board of

Health. He was further empowered to appoint medical officers for the

Poor Law Unions, with salaries to be paid by the Treasury; such medical

officers to be under the control of the guardians. The Board of Health

was authorized to direct guardians to provide fever hospitals and

dispensaries, together with medicines and all other necessaries for

those hospitals. This Act was to cease in September, 1847, but in the

April of that year an Act to amend and extend it to November, 1847, was

passed. Eventually, it remained in its amended form in force until the

end of the Parliamentary Session of 1850.

The changes made by this second or amended Fever Act were of a very

extensive kind. By the previous one medical relief was to be given

through the guardians of the poor; by the Act as amended, the Board of

Health was empowered to certify to the Relief Commissioners, the

necessity of medical relief being afforded, in _any electoral division_

in which there was a Relief Committee. It was also to direct such

Committees to provide fever hospitals, and every other thing necessary

for the treatment of patients. And further: the Relief Commissioners, on

the certificate of the Board of Health, were to issue their order to

Relief Committees, to provide medical attendance, medicines, and

_nutriment_, if necessary, for such patients as were not received into

hospital, either because there was not accommodation for them, or

because it might endanger their lives to remove them. The Board of

Health acted as little as possible upon this clause; holding that, under

existing circumstances, it was impossible to treat patients with

advantage in their own houses. Those hospitals and dispensaries were

managed by the Relief Committees, under the control of the Relief

Commissioners, appointed to carry out the Act 10 Vic., cap. 7. By the

16th clause of the amended Fever Act, provision is made "for the proper

and decent interment of the deceased destitute persons who shall die of

fever or any other epidemic disease in any electoral division or

district, for which any Relief Committee shall have been constituted."

Whilst this very extensive system of medical relief was established and

carried out under the second Bill, the guardians of the poor continued

to use the powers granted to them in the former Bill, of giving medical

relief. The returns from these two sources give, respectively, the

number of fever cases received into their hospitals, but we have no

authentic means of determining the number of persons who died of fever

in their own houses, or on the highways and byways, as they wandered

about in search, of food. Such cases must have been very numerous.

Although fever or other epidemics did not arise to an alarming extent in

1846, still, that year showed a decided increase of them over previous

years. The following summary, derived from circulars issued, shows the

origin and progress of fever in 1846. "Fever began in Mitchelstown,

County Cork. It attacked equally those in good and bad health; but in

some instances, as in Innishannon and in Cove, many, in the best health;

while in Mitchelstown, the majority had previously suffered from

privation. Young persons appear to have been the subject of the

epidemic, more than those of more advanced life. The pressure from

without upon the city [of Cork] began to be felt in October; and in

November and December, the influx of paupers from all parts of this vast

county was so overwhelming, that, to prevent them from dying in the

streets, the doors of the Workhouse were thrown open, and in one week,

500 persons were admitted without any provision, either of space or

clothing, to meet so fearful an emergency. All these were suffering from

famine, and most of them from malignant dysentery or fever. The fever

was, in the first instance, undoubtedly confined to persons badly fed,

or crowded into unwholesome habitations; and, as it originated with the

vast migratory hordes of labourers and their families congregated upon

the public roads, it commonly was termed 'the road fever.' In

Cloughjordan, County Tipperary, the fever cases doubled in 1846 what

they had been in the previous year. The disease commenced in Clonmel in

November. The accounts from the Counties of Limerick and Kerry do not

record any increased sickness during this year. The epidemic commenced

in the County of Tyrone in the December of 1846. Young persons were

those chiefly attacked there. The fever commenced at Loughgall, County

Armagh, in the end of this year. The lower classes were chiefly

attacked; the majority of those affected having been previously in bad

health. The epidemic materially declined as the poor were better fed.

The fever was frequently preceded by scurvy. Individuals at the age of

puberty were chiefly attacked,--females more generally than males. In

Newry, dysentery existed as an epidemic during the autumn of 1846, being

very fatal among the old and infirm, who, if not carried off, were so

debilitated by its effects, as to render them an easy prey to the fever

which followed. In Dublin, although the great outbreak of the fever was

in 1847, yet, cases were noticed to have occurred in the latter end of

1846, in a greater proportion than usual. Those first attacked were

individuals who had been reduced by bad diet or insufficiency of food,

and throughout the continuance of the epidemic, the lower classes were

chiefly affected. In many cases, the fever set in immediately after

recovering from the effects of starvation, and although scurvy preceded

the disease, neither it nor purpura was noticed to have occurred as a

concomitant symptom. In the Province of Connaught, the epidemic

commenced in many places during the year 1846, especially in the

Counties of Sligo and Leitrim; in the former locality the young were

chiefly attacked; in the latter fever broke out so early as June, when

upwards of two hundred cases were at one time in the Workhouse of

Carrick-on-Shannon; while, in the remote northern hilly districts of the

county, it did not appear until December, 1847; those attacked were, for

the most part, reduced from want of food. In some parts, the fever was

preceded by aphthous ulcers on the tongue and gums; young persons were

those chiefly attacked, and females more than males. In the County of

Roscommon, the previous health of the population was much impaired;

bowel complaints were frequent; the fever commenced in the end of 1846

or beginning of 1847, and was very prevalent. The Workhouse of Castlerea

was one of the most severely afflicted during the epidemic, of any

similar class of institution in Ireland--as many as fifty persons a week

having died at one period subsequent to this--and, for a long time, all

attempt at separate burial was found impossible. In the County Galway

the epidemic of both dysentery and fever appeared at Ahascragh and

Clifden, separate ends of the district, at the end of this year."[269]

As was anticipated, fever rose to a fearful height in 1847. And, say the

Commissioners of Health, "the state of the medical institutions of

Ireland was, unfortunately, such as peculiarly unfitted them to afford

the required medical aid, on the breaking out of the epidemic. The

county infirmaries had not provision for the accommodation of fever

patients. The county fever hospitals were destitute of sufficient funds;

and dispensaries, established for the purpose of affording only ordinary

out-door medical relief, could, of course, afford no efficient

attendance on the numbers of destitute persons, suffering from acute

contagious diseases in their own miserable abodes, often scattered over

districts several miles in extent."

In January, fever complicated with dysentery and small pox became very

rife in Belfast, and accounts from various other places soon showed,

that it had seized upon the whole country. The week ending the 3rd of

April, the total number of inmates in Irish Workhouses was 104,455, of

whom 9,000 were fever patients. The deaths in that week were 2,706, and

the average of deaths in each week during the month was twenty-five per

thousand of the entire inmates--a death rate which would have hurried

to the grave, every man, woman, and child in the Workhouses of Ireland,

in about nine months! but it gradually decreased, until in October it

stood at five per thousand in the week.

On the 19th we read that, "the number suffering from fever in Swinford

is beyond calculation." Some idea of the dreadful mortality now

prevalent in Cork, may be found from the fact, that in one day

thirty-six bodies were interred in the same grave; the deaths in the

Workhouse there from the 27th of December, 1846, until the middle of

April--less than four months--amounted to 2,130. At this period, dropsy,

the result of starvation, became almost universal. On the 16th of April,

there were upwards of three hundred cases of fever in the

Carrick-on-Shannon Workhouse, and the weekly deaths amounted to fifty.

Again: every avenue leading to the plague-stricken town of Macroom has a

fever hospital; persons of all ages are dropping dead in the streets. In

May, it is announced that fever continued to rage with unabated fury at

Castlebar. "Sligo is a plague spot; disease in every street, and of the

worst kind." "Fever is committing fearful ravages in Ballindine,

Ballinrobe, Claremorris, Westport, Ballina, and Belmullet, all in the

county of Mayo." From Roscommon the news came, that the increase of

fever was truly awful; the hospitals were full, and applicants were

daily refused admission; "no one can tell," says the writer, "what

becomes of these unfortunate beings; they are brought away by their

pauper friends, and no more is heard of them." "Seven bodies were found

inside a hedge," in the parish of Kilglass; the dogs had the flesh

almost eaten off. Under date of the 18th of May, I find this entry;

"Small pox, added to fever and dysentery, is prevalent at Middleton,

County Cork; and, near Bantry Abbey, 900 bodies were interred in a plot

of ground forty feet square." From the autumn of 1846 to May, 1847, ten

thousand persons were interred in Father Mathew's cemetery at Cork--he

was obliged to close it. On the 12th of June, the number of fever

patients in the hospitals of Belfast was 1,840. "Awful fever," "Fearful

increase of fever," were the ordinary phrases, in which the spread of

the disease was announced from every part of Ireland.[270]

"Of the extent of the epidemic in Dublin, it would not be easy to give

any very correct idea. The hospital accommodation of the city amounted

to about 2,500 beds, a greater amount by 1,000, I believe, than were

opened in any previous epidemic. It may give some idea of the vast

amount of sickness, to state, that, at the Cork Street hospital, nearly

12,000 cases applied during a period of about ten months. At one period

there were upwards of 400 outstanding tickets; and as many as eighty

applications for admission have been made in one day. Still it may be

safely stated, that all this would give a very imperfect idea of the

real amount; for all who had to go amongst the poor at their own houses,

were well aware, that vast numbers remained there, who either could not

be accommodated in hospital, or who never thought of applying. It was

quite common to find three, four, and even five ill in a house, where

application had been made but for one. I think the very lowest estimate

which could be arrived at cannot make the numbers who sickened in Dublin

short of 40,000. The greatest pressure on the hospital took place in the

month of June, from which time the fever gradually declined, till the

month of February, 1848, when the epidemic may be said to have

ceased."[271]

In February, 1847, fourteen applications were made to the Board of

Health, for providing temporary hospital accommodation; in March, they

received fifty-one such applications; in April, fifty-three, in May,

fifty-two; in June, twenty-two; in July, sixty; in August, forty-eight;

in September the number was ten, and in October only eight. The

applications to the Board of Health for temporary fever hospitals in

1847 were 343; the entire number of such applications up to 1850, when

the Board closed its labours, were 576, of which 203 were refused.

Relapse was a remarkable feature of this famine-fever. "Relapses were so

common," writes Dr. Freke from a western county, "as to appear

characteristic of the epidemic; in several cases they have occurred so

frequently as three, or even four times in the same individual." At

Nohaval, Kinsale Union, out of 250 cases 240 relapsed.

The cases received into the permanent and temporary fever hospitals of

Ireland in the year 1845, were 37,604; in 1846 they increased to 40,620;

and in 1847 they rose to the enormous amount of 156,824 cases![272] of

which, according to the Report of the Board of Health, 95,890 were

admitted into temporary hospitals,[273] in which the percentage of

deaths was ten two-fifths; more males dying than females, the percentage

of deaths among males being eleven one-fifth, and among females nine

six-tenths. But the mortality in the fever sheds sometimes rose to

fifteen, twenty, twenty-five, and in a few instances to twenty-eight and

twenty-nine per cent.; the cause being previous dysentery (on which

cholera sometimes supervened) and starvation. In Eyrecourt, Ballinrobe

Union, the death-rate rose to twenty-nine one-third per cent.; in West

Skull to twenty; and in Parsonstown to twenty-nine five-eighths. The

principal complications of this famine-fever, according to the

Commissioners of Health, were dysentery, purpura, diarrhoea, and

small-pox; and they further say of it that it was, perhaps, unparalleled

for duration and severity.[274]

The average weekly cost of each patient in the temporary hospitals,

including the salary of the medical officer, was four shillings and one

halfpenny.

"Some approximation to the amount of the immense mortality that

prevailed may be gleaned from the published tables, which show that

within that calamitous period between the end of 1845 and the conclusion

of the first quarter of 1851, as many as 61,260 persons died in the

hospitals and sanitary institutions, exclusive of those who died in the

Workhouses and auxiliary Workhouses. Taking the recorded deaths from

fever alone, between the beginning of 1846 and the end of 1849, and

assuming the mortality at one in ten, which is the very lowest

calculation, and far below what we believe really did occur, above a

million and a-half, or 1,595,040 persons, being one in 4.11 of the

population in 1851, must have suffered from fever during that period.

But no pen has recorded the numbers of the forlorn and starving who

perished by the wayside or in the ditches, or of the mournful groups,

sometimes of whole families, who lay down and died, one after another,

upon the floor of their miserable cabins, and so remained uncoffined and

unburied, till chance unveiled the appalling scene. No such amount of

suffering and misery has been chronicled in Irish history since the days

of Edward Bruce, and yet, through all, the forbearance of the Irish

peasantry, and the calm submission with which they bore the deadliest

ills that can fall on man, can scarcely be paralleled in the annals of

any people."[275]

An unusual disease on land, scurvy, appeared during the Famine. The

Commissioners of Health attribute its appearance (1) to the want of

variety of food: the potato being gone, they say, the people did not

understand the necessity for variety, and men, such as railway porters,

who had wages enough to buy food, took scurvy for want of this variety,

coffee and white bread being their common dietary. (2) Another cause

was the eating of what was called "potato flour," got from rotten

potatoes; it was not flour at all, and did not contain the elements of

the potato, but consisted wholly of starch as foecula. (3) The use of

raw or badly cooked food also brought on scurvy; and the Commissioners

of Health, therefore, strongly recommended the giving of food in a

cooked form.[276]

Emigration played a very leading part in the terrible drama of the Irish

Famine of 1847; indeed, it was the potato failure of 1822, and the

consequent famine of 1823, which first gave emigration official

importance in this country. A Parliamentary Committee was appointed in

the latter year, before which Mr. Wilmot Horton, the Under Secretary of

State, explained in detail a plan of emigration from Ireland, then under

the consideration of Government, and which was afterwards carried into

effect. The emigrants were sent to Canada; and Peterborough, at the time

a very insignificant place, was fixed upon as their head quarters. On

two subsequent occasions, Mr. Horton stated this emigration to have been

eminently successful, which was fully corroborated by the evidence of

Captain Rubidge, before the Lords' Committee of 1847, on "Colonization

from Ireland." But this emigration, as well as that of 1825, both of

which were superintended by the Hon. Peter Robinson, was on a very

limited scale. The number taken out to Canada in the first emigration

was only 568 persons, men, women, and children. The Government supported

them for eighteen months after their landing, which very much increased

the expense; each of those emigrants having cost the country £22 before

they were finally settled. In 1825 Mr. Robinson took out 2,024 emigrants

under the same conditions, but in this instance the expense was slightly

diminished, the cost of each person being £21 10s. These emigrants also

prospered, but the money outlay in each case was so considerable, that

the experiment could not be extended, nor, in fact, repeated.[277]

From this period, committees continued to sit on the subject of

emigration, almost year after year; emigration from Ireland, even in the

absence of famine, being considered of the highest importance--and why?

Chiefly, because Irish labourers were lowering the rate of wages in the

English labour market--so it is stated in the report of the Select

Committee of 1826, in the following words:--"The question of emigration

from Ireland is decided by the population itself; and that which remains

for the legislature to decide is, whether it shall be turned to the

improvement of the British North American colonies, or whether it shall

be suffered and encouraged to take that which will be, and is, its

inevitable course, _to deluge Great Britain with poverty and

wretchedness_, and gradually, but certainly, to equalize the state of

the English and Irish peasantry. Two different rates of wages, and two

different conditions of the labouring classes, cannot permanently

co-exist. One of two results appears to be inevitable; the Irish

population must be raised towards the standard of the English, or the

English depressed towards that of the Irish. The question, whether an

extensive plan of emigration shall or shall not be adopted, appears to

your Committee to resolve itself into the simple point, whether the

wheat-fed population of Great Britain shall or shall not be supplanted

by the potato-fed population of Ireland?"[278]

The same reasons are given by the same Committee in 1827, and they are

again repeated in 1830, by another Committee, whose duty it was to

inquire into the state of the Irish poor.

The famous Devon Land Commission, which was called into existence in

1842, presented its voluminous report to Parliament in 1845, which was

founded on the examination of eleven hundred witnesses, whose evidence

was taken on the spot in every county in Ireland; the Commissioners

having visited more than ninety towns for the purpose;--that Commission

recommended emigration from Ireland, but in a cautious and modified way.

The Commissioners say:--"After considering the recommendations, thus

repeatedly made by Committees of Parliament upon this subject, and the

evidence of Mr. Godley, in which the different views of the subject are

well given, we desire to express our own conviction, that a

well-organized system of emigration may be of very great service, as one

among the measures which the situation of the occupiers of land in

Ireland, at present calls for. We cannot think that either emigration,

or the extension of Public Works, or the reclamation or improvement of

land can, singly, remove the existing evil. All these remedies must be

provided concurrently, according to the circumstances of each case. In

this view, and to this extent only, we wish to direct attention to the

subject of emigration."[279]

A Select Committee of the House of Lords, on the operation of the Poor

Law in Ireland, spoke approvingly of emigration as a relief to the

labour market at home, and it therefore recommended, "that increased

facilities for the emigration of poor persons should be afforded, with

the cooperation of the Government."[280]

One Parliamentary Committee, at least, condemned emigration in terms

both decided and remarkable; it was the Committee of Public Works

appointed in 1835. In its second report this passage occurs:--"It may be

doubted, whether the country does contain a sufficient quantity of

labour to develope its resources; and while the empire is loaded with

taxation to defray the charges of its wars, it appears most politic to

use its internal resources for improving the condition of its

population, by which the revenue of the exchequer must be increased,

rather than encourage emigration, by which the revenue would suffer

diminution, or than leave the labouring classes in their present state,

by which poverty, crime, and the charges of Government must be

inevitably extended."[281]

Previous to the Famine there was a large and steady emigration from

Ireland for many years, independent of Government aid. The total

colonial and foreign emigration between 1831 and 1841 amounted to

403,459, to which the returns add 25,012, for probable births, that item

being calculated at one and a-half per cent. per annum; making a total

of 428,471. These figures give a yearly average of nearly 43,000.[282]

Of these, 214,047 embarked from Irish ports, 152,738 from Liverpool;

and ten per cent. was added for imperfect returns. The largest number of

those who went from Ireland _direct_ to the colonies or foreign

countries, from any one port, embarked at Belfast, viz., twenty per

cent. of the whole. From Cork nearly the same. From the ports of Ulster

there went 76,905. From the ports of Munster 70,046. From Leinster

34,977, and from Connaught only 32,119. Those emigrants who embarked

from Irish ports proceeded as follows:--189,225 to British America,

namely, 107,792 males and 81,233 females; to the United States of

America 19,775, namely, 10,725 males, and 2,950 females; to the

Australian colonies, there went 4,553, in the proportion of 2,300 males

and 2,253 females; and 494 persons embarked for the West Indies--300

males and 194 females.[283]

Within the decade of years comprised between 1831 and 1841, emigration

was at its minimum in 1838, the number that left our shores in that year

being only 14,700; it rose to its maximum in 1841, namely, 71,392. It

rose still higher in 1842, the emigrants of that year being set down at

89,686. The year 1843 was named by O'Connell the Repeal year; the people

were filled with the hope of soon seeing a parliament in College Green,

and to this fact may probably, be attributed the great falling off in

emigration; the number for that year being only 37,509. It increased in

1844 to 54,289; and in 1845--the eve of the Famine, to 74,969 persons.

In the year 1846, as might be expected, emigration from Ireland reached

a height which it had never attained before in a single year; the

number, as estimated by the Emigration Commissioners, being 105,955.

Besides which between the 13th of January and the 1st of November,

278,005 immigrants arrived at Liverpool from Ireland; but the Irish

labourers who, at that time, annually visited England, and who were

variously estimated at from 10,000 to 30,000, are included in the

number. For the protection of the emigrants, additional agents were

appointed by the Government at Liverpool and some Irish ports; and the

annual vote in aid of colonial funds, for the relief of sick and

destitute emigrants from the United Kingdom, was increased from £1,000

to £10,000.[284]

In the spring of 1847, a gigantic emigration scheme was launched. It was

said to have emanated from, and was certainly patronized by members of

the so-called Irish party, which, with so few elements of cohesion, was

inaugurated at the Rotundo meeting; but the father of the scheme seems

to have been Mr. J.E. Godley. By it, two millions of Irish Catholics

were to be transferred to Canada in three years; it being a leading

feature in the scheme to send none but Catholics. It was, the promoters

said, to be an Irish Catholic colony, with a distinct and well marked

Irish nationality,--in fact, a New Ireland! There was a memorial on the

subject which extended over fifty one pages of a pamphlet, and which was

prepared by Mr. Godley with much ability. It went very fully into the

whole scheme. This, accompanied by a short explanatory letter, was

presented to the Prime Minister on the last day of March.

The memorialists assumed that the cultivation of the potato could not be

persevered in, and that Ireland, in her existing condition, could not

grow enough of corn food for six millions of people. Hence the necessity

for an extensive emigration. They are not, they say, to be ranked among

those who believe Ireland incapable of supporting its existing

population in comfort, under other circumstances; far from it. On the

contrary, they do not doubt that if "the social economy" of Ireland were

made to resemble that of England, the population of Ireland might be

larger than it then was. It was only under existing circumstances that

the population of Ireland was redundant, and all they desired was a

temporary decrease.

In the letter which accompanied the memorial to the Premier, the

memorialists put their views, shortly, as follows:--1. The present

condition of Ireland is such, that there must be, for some years, a vast

increase of emigration, they, therefore, urge the necessity of what they

call "systematic colonization," both for the advantage of the emigrants

themselves, and the good of the colony to which they would emigrate.

They think this colonization, "on a very large scale," ought to be made

from Ireland to Canada, and that the State ought to lend its assistance

to promote it. 2. In the second place they lay it down as an essential

part of their scheme, that religious provision must be made for the

emigrants. 3. They think there would be great advantage in enlisting

private enterprise, in the form of agency, to carry out the plan. 4.

Furthermore, there must be a willingness on the part of the nation to

accept an income and property tax, for the purpose of defraying the cost

of emigration: and, 5. To help the emigrants to settle on the land,

"aids to location," as Mr. Godley called them, must be provided.

How was this vast scheme to be carried to a successful issue? A

joint-stock company, to be called "The Irish Canadian Company," was to

undertake the entire management of it. This Company was to be legalised

by Act of Parliament, and recognised by the Canadian Government. It was

to transmit to Canada and settle there a million and a half of the Irish

people in three years, being at the rate of half a million a year. To do

this, £9,000,000 was to be lent by the Government, at the rate of

£3,000,000 each year, on the security of Irish property and an Irish

income tax. This tax was to be one per cent. the first year, two per

cent. the second year, three per cent. the third year, and to stand at

three per cent. until the first instalment of the loan could be paid,

and was, of course, to cease altogether when the last instalment was

paid. Repayment was to be made at the rate of six and a half per cent.,

per annum, which would extinguish principal and interest in twenty two

years.

The £9,000,000 so lent and to be so repaid, was to be expended in this

manner: The passage money of each individual was computed at £3; of this

the Government was to advance one pound, the emigrants themselves

finding the other two in some way--to be given by friends--saved from

wages--obtained from their landlords--however the £2 was to be

found,--that sum was to be provided by the emigrant. One pound to each

of one million and a-half of emigrants would absorb £1,500,000 of the

£9,000,000. The joint-stock company that was to work the concern must,

of course, have profits, and be paid for its labours; it was, therefore,

to have a bonus of £5, or a sum of about that amount, for each emigrant

it would prove to the satisfaction of Government that it had located in

Canada. It was to have other profits. It was to be empowered to lend

money to the district councils in Canada, to effect local improvements,

and the interest of this money was to be a portion of its profits. All

the emigrants were to be settled on the land in Canada; this would be

bought in its rude state by the company, and resold at a profit, when it

had improved it, and established upon it those "aids to location"

enumerated further on. This bonus of £5 on each, emigrant would amount

to £7,500,000, which, together with the £1,500,000 mentioned above,

would absorb the £9,000,000.

As already stated, it was a marked characteristic of this systematic

emigration, or colonization, that it was to be exclusively Catholic, and

that a number of priests, proportioned to the number of emigrants,

should be appointed to accompany them and settle down with them. This

Mr. Godley held to be absolutely necessary. Before the Lords' Committee

on Colonization he is asked: "Has any mode occurred to you by which a

more compacted social organization might be given to emigration,

carrying with it more of the characteristics and elements of improved

civilization than at present exists?" He answers: "Yes. I have explained

my views upon the subject at considerable length elsewhere. I think that

the nucleus of an Irish Roman Catholic emigration must be

ecclesiastical, I think they are debarred from going upon the land and

settling socially, by the want of the ordinances of their church; I

think that the first and most important element, in an Irish social

settlement must be religious and ecclesiastical."[285] Again he is

asked: "At the present moment, has it come within your knowledge, that

the want of such spiritual care and assistance checks the progress of

settlement among Irish emigrants, and, consequently, to a certain

extent, discourages emigration?" "Certainly," Mr. Godley answers, "it

prevents them from going upon the land all over America." "How does it,"

he is further asked, "prevent them from going upon the land?" "In this

way," he replies, "they being too poor to take the priest with them to

the wilderness, in order to partake of the ordinances of their church,

and to enjoy spiritual advice and comfort, remain in the towns, where

they are simply labourers, and are checked in going upon the land as

rural settlers."[286] _Question_ 1819: "How do you propose that the

priests should be paid?" _Answer_: "By a grant from this country or from

Ireland." _Question_ 1820: "Do you mean simply the expense of their

emigration, not as a permanent endowment in the colony?" _Answer_: "I

never entered so exactly into the detail as to say in what manner I

thought the endowment might be best effected, and, consequently, I do

not consider myself as committed to any particular plan of endowment.

The probability is, that the most effective way of endowing them would

be, to a certain extent, in money, and to a certain extent by land in

Canada; but that is a part of the plan which I did not consider

necessary to draw out in detail." The following question and answer

explains what Mr. Godley meant by "aids to location:"--_Question_ 1848:

"What is the practical mode in which you would set about the

establishment of a colony?" _Answer_: "I would open the country by means

of roads and bridges, build mills, endow a clergyman, and build a

school. Those are the leading features of a social settlement to which I

think a company, or any body that wanted to establish a settlement,

ought to attend first."

The memorial to Lord John Russell, praying that the Government would

give its sanction and support to Mr. Godley's scheme of colonization,

was signed by one archbishop, four marquises, seven earls, three

viscounts, thirteen barons, nine baronets, eighteen members of

parliament, some honourables, and several deputy-lieutenants. The

memorialists were, in all, eighty--that is, eighty of the leading peers,

members of parliament, and landowners approached the First Minister, to

beg that he would aid them in sending two millions of Irish Catholics to

Canada, to reclaim the land in that colony. Everybody knows that the

statement of Sir Robert Kane is accepted as a truth, that there are in

Ireland four and a-half millions of barren acres, the greater portion of

which would richly, and promptly, repay for their reclamation. Yet the

Government Bill for beginning that reclamation was withdrawn by the

Prime Minister, and no single voice was raised in favour of going on

with it; moreover, he said his reason for withdrawing it was, the

opposition which the House of Lords offered to it. Yes; they would have

no reclamation of Irish lands, but they would submit to bear increased

taxation in order to send the Celtic race by the million to delve in

Canada!--yet, even for that it became the Irish people to be duly

grateful, inasmuch as it was a decided improvement upon the older

colonization scheme of "To h----or Connaught."[287]

The colonization scheme met with little or no support in Ireland. It was

suspected. It was regarded as a plan for getting rid of the Celt by

wholesale. A Protestant gentleman, Mr. Thomas Mulock, thus comments on

the memorial: "And is it come to this, O ye lords and gentlemen!

representatives of the Irish party, with prospective adhesions after the

Easter holidays from the vast majority of Irish Protestant

proprietors,--do you avow yourselves to be in the position of

landowners, who stand in no relation of aristocracy or leadership,

government or guidance, succour or solace to millions of the people, who

famish on the territorial possessions from which you derive your titles,

your importance, your influence, your wealth. Has confiscation been

mellowed into the legal semblance of undisputed succession, only to

bring about a state of things which the most ruthless ravagers of

nations never permanently perpetrated?"[288]

The memorial was extensively circulated. Amongst many others, one was

sent to the Right Rev. Dr. Maginn, Coadjutor Bishop of Derry. He replied

in terms scathing as they were indignant. The following is an extract

from his letter:--"In sober earnestness, gentlemen, why send your

circular to a Catholic bishop? Why have the bare-faced impudence to ask

me to consent to the expatriation of millions of my co-religionists and

fellow-countrymen? You, the hereditary oppressors of my race and my

religion,--you, who reduced one of the noblest peoples under heaven to

live in the most fertile island on earth on the worst species of a

miserable exotic, which no humane man, having anything better, would

constantly give to his swine or his horses;--you, who have made the most

beautiful island under the sun a land of skulls, or of ghastly

spectres;--you are anxious, I presume, to get a Catholic bishop to abet

your wholesale system of extermination--to head in pontificals the

convoy of your exiles, and thereby give the sanction of religion to your

atrocious scheme. You never, gentlemen, laboured under a more egregious

mistake than by imagining that we could give in our adhesion to your

principles, or could have any, the least confidence, in anything

proceeding from you. Is not the _ex-officio_ clause in the Poor-law

Bill your bantling, or that of your leader, Lord Stanley? Is not the

quarter of an acre clause test for relief your creation? Were not the

most conspicuous names on your committee the abettors of an amendment as

iniquitous as it was selfish--viz., to remove the poor-rates from their

own shoulders to that of their pauper tenantry? Are not they the same

members who recently advocated, in the House of Commons, the

continuation of the fag-end of the bloody penal code of the English

statute book, by which our English brethren could be transported or

hanged for professing the creed of their conscience, the most forward in

this Catholic emigration plan? What good could we expect from such a

Nazareth?"[289]

The Prime Minister did not take up the great colonization scheme. He

said, in the House of Commons, on the 29th of April, that he declined,

on the part of the Government, assuming the responsibility of providing

for the absorption of the great excess of labour then existing in

Ireland. "I deny," said Lord John, "on the part of the Government, the

responsibility of completely, still less suddenly, resolving that

question. What we can do, and what we, the Government, have endeavoured

to do is, to mitigate present suffering."

The Government was of opinion that emigration, left to itself, would

transfer the starving people to the United States and British America,

as quickly as they could be provided for in those countries. This

calculation turned out to be correct enough, as the following figures

will show:--Emigration from Ireland in the year 1845 is set down at

74,969; it increased in 1846 to 105,955, although the Famine had not to

the full extent turned the minds of the people to seek homes in the New

World. The emigration of 1847 more than doubled that of 1846, being

215,444; ti fell in 1848 to 178,159, but in 1849 the emigration of 1847

was repeated, the emigrants of that year being 214,425, of which 2,219

were orphan girls from the Workhouses. The magnitude of the exodus was

maintained in 1850, that year giving 209,054 voluntary exiles; but the

emigration in 1851, which year closed the decade, quite outstripped that

of any previous year, the figure in that year standing at 257,372.[290]

The census of 1841 shows the population of Ireland to have been in that

year 8,175,124. Taking the usual ratio of births over deaths, it should

have increased in 1851 to 9,018,799, instead of which it fell to

6,552,385; thus, being nearly two millions and a-half less than it

should have been. These two millions and a-half disappeared in the

Famine. They disappeared by death and emigration. The emigration during

the ten years from 1842 to 1851, both inclusive, was 1,436,862.

Subtracting this from the amount of decrease in the population, namely,

2,476,414, the remainder will be 1,039,552; which number of persons must

have died of starvation and its concomitant epidemics; but even this

number, great as it is, must be supplemented by the deaths which

occurred among Famine emigrants, in excess of the percentage of deaths

among ordinary emigrants.

During the Famine-emigration period this excess became most remarkable

and alarming. The deaths on the voyage to Canada rose from five in the

thousand (the ordinary rate) to about sixty in the thousand; and the

deaths whilst the ships were in quarantine rose from one to forty in the

thousand. So that instead of six emigrants in the thousand dying on the

voyage and during quarantine, one hundred died. Subtracting six from one

hundred, we have ninety-four emigrants in the thousand dying of the

Famine as certainly as if they had died at home. Furthermore, great

numbers of those who were able to reach the interior died off almost

immediately. Sir Charles Trevelyan, the Government official, from whose

_Irish Crisis_ I take the above figures, adds these remarkable words:

"besides _still larger_ numbers who died at Quebec, Montreal, and

elsewhere in the interior."[291]

89,738 emigrants embarked for Canada in 1847. One in every three of

those who arrived were received into hospital, and the deaths on the

passage or soon after arriving were 15,330, or rather more than

_seventeen_ per cent. As the deaths amongst emigrants, in ordinary

times, were about 3/4 per cent., at least sixteen per cent. of those

deaths may be set down as being occasioned by the Famine. But seventeen

per cent., high as it seems, does not fully represent the mortality

amongst the Famine emigrants. Speaking of those who went to Canada in

1847, Dr. Stratten says: "Up to the 1st of November, one emigrant in

every seven had died; and during November and December there have been

many deaths in the different emigrant hospitals; so that it is

understating the mortality to say that one person in every five was dead

by the end of the year."[292]

This would give us twenty per cent. of deaths up to the end of 1847; but

the mortality consequent upon the Famine-emigration did not stop short

at the end of December; it must have gone on through the remainder of

the winter and spring, so that, everything considered, twenty-five per

cent. does not seem too high a rate at which to fix it for that year.

It is, however, to be taken into account, that the mortality amongst

Irish emigrants in 1847 was exceptionally great, so, in an average for

the six years from 1846 to 1851 we must strike below it. Seventeen per

cent does not seem too high an average for those six years.

We have not such full information about those who emigrated to the

United States as we have of those who went to Canada; the Canadian

emigrants had certainly some advantages on their side; for, until the

year 1847 there was no protection for emigrants who landed at New York.

In that year the Legislature of the State of New York passed a law,

establishing a permanent Commission for the relief and protection of

emigrants, which, in due time, when it got into working order, did a

world of good. Previous to this, private hospitals were established by

the shipbrokers (the creatures of the shipowners), in the neighbourhood

of New York. A Committee appointed by the Aldermen of New York in 1846

visited one of those institutions, and thus reported upon it: "The

Committee discovered in one apartment, 50 feet square, 100 sick and

dying emigrants lying on straw; and among them, in their midst, the

bodies of two who had died four or five days before, but who had been

left for that time without burial! They found in the course of their

inquiry that decayed vegetables, bad flour, and putrid meat, were

specially purchased and provided for the use of the strangers! Such as

had strength to escape from these slaughter-houses fled from them as

from a plague, and roamed through the city, exciting the

compassion--perhaps the horror--of the passers by. Those who were too

ill to escape had to take their chance--such chance as poisonous food,

infected air, and bad treatment afforded them of ultimate

recovery."[293]

It may be fairly assumed that the mortality amongst the emigrants who

went to the United States was at least as great as amongst those who

went to British America. The emigration from Ireland for the above six

years was, as already stated, 1,180,409, seventeen per cent. of whom

will give us 200,668, which, being added to 1,039,552, the calculated

number of deaths at home, we have ONE MILLION, TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY

THOUSAND DEATHS resulting directly from the Irish Famine, and the

pestilence which followed in its track.

The mortality on board some of the emigrant ships was terrible; and,

whatever the cause, the deaths in _British ships_ enormously exceeded

those in the ships of any other country.[294] The "Erin Queen" sailed

with 493 passengers, of whom 136 died on the voyage. The scenes of

misery on board of this vessel could hardly have been surpassed in a

crowded and sickly slaver on the African coast. It appears, writes Dr.

Stratten, that the "Avon," in 552 passengers, had 246 deaths; and the

"Virginius," in 476, had 267 deaths.[295] An English gentleman,

referring to a portion of Connaught in which he was stationed at the

time, writes thus: "Hundreds, it is said, had been compelled to emigrate

by ill-usage, and in one vessel containing 600 not _one hundred_

survived!"[296]

Much sympathy was shown in Canada for the poor emigrants, and their

orphans were, to a great extent, adopted by charitable families. The

legislature of the State of New York, and many of its leading citizens,

showed a laudable desire to aid and protect emigrants, in spite of which

the most cruel and heartless villainies were practised upon the

inexperienced strangers the moment they landed; in fact, before they

landed the ship was surrounded by harpies, who seized their luggage and

partly by violence, partly by wheedling and misrepresentation, led them

where they pleased, and plundered then at will.

The legislature of the State of New York, in 1847, appointed a Committee

to inquire into the frauds practised upon emigrants. It made its report

in January 1848. In the fourth page of that Report these words occur:

"Your Committee must confess, that they had no conception of, nor would

they have believed the extent to which these frauds and outrages have

been practised, until they came to investigate them." The first set of

robbers into whose hands the emigrants fell were called "runners." They

are described in the Report as a class who boarded the emigrant ship and

brought the emigrants to their special lodging-houses in spite of them,

and in spite of the authorities. They took charge of their luggage,

pretending that nothing would be demanded for the storage of it, the

price claimed for which afterwards was exorbitant, and the luggage was

held until it was paid.

The frauds committed with regard to passage tickets were if possible

more grievous than those practised by the runners. "The emigrant," says

the Report, buys a ticket at an exorbitant price, with a picture on it

representing a steam-boat, railway cars, and a canal packet drawn by

three prancing horses, to bring him to some place beyond Albany. _He

gets a steam-boat ticket to Albany_. Here his great ticket, with the

pictures, is protested; he has to pay once more, and instead of railroad

cars and a packet-boat, he is thrust into the steerage or hold of a line

boat, which amongst other conveniences is furnished with false scales

for weighing his luggage.

A few extracts from the testimony of some of the witnesses examined

before the Committee will show how unexaggerated was the Report.

Henry Vail is examined: he testifies that he is employed by E. Mathews.

His practice is to get all he can for tickets; he retains whatever is

over the proper price and gets his monthly pay besides. The only

exception to his getting all he can, is, he declares upon his oath, that

he "_never shaves a lady that is travelling alone_. It is bad enough,"

in his opinion, "to shave a man."[297] Charles Cooke said, in his

examination, that he had been employed by many offices. He heard

Rieschmüller tell passengers to go to the d----l, they could not get

less than twelve dollars as deck passengers on the lake, and he made

them believe they must get their tickets from him, which they did.

"Rieschmüller told me," said Cooke, "that all he was compelled to pay

for a passenger to any port on the lakes was from two dollars to two and

a-half. Wolfe told me that two dollars was the price, and all luggage

free."[298] Mervyn L. Ray swore that he knew Mr. Adams to take twelve

dollars for a passenger to Buffalo, when he (Ray) would have given him

the same fare at two dollars.

One of the witnesses, T.R. Schoger enters into some details. 1. The

first fraud, he says, practised on emigrants is this:--the moment the

vessel arrives it is boarded by runners, whose first object appears to

be to get emigrants to their respective public houses. Once there they

are considered sure prey. There are, of course, rival establishments;

each has agents (runners) and bullies. There is often bloodshed between

them. The emigrant is bewildered. He is told he will get meals for

sixpence a piece--he never gets one less than two shillings, and he is

often charged a dollar a meal. 2. The next ordeal is called booking;

that is, he is taken to the forwarding office, and told it is the _only_

office, the proprietors being owners of boats, railways, etc. The runner

gets one dollar for everyone booked. 3. The next imposition is at

Albany; it is there the great fraud is perpetrated. If they find the

emigrant has plenty of money they make him pay the whole passage over

again,--repudiating all that was done at New York. 4. The next is the

luggage. It is falsely weighed, and the emigrant is often made to pay

five or six times more than the proper charge. "The emigrant," adds Mr.

Schoger, "now thinks himself out of his difficulty, but finds himself

greatly mistaken. The passengers are crowded like beasts into the canal

boat, and are frequently compelled to pay their passage over again, or

be thrown overboard by the captain."[299] The mates of the ships often

took the property of emigrants; their locks were picked and their chests

robbed; for none of which outrages was there the slightest redress.[300]

Before the legislature took any effective action in protecting the

emigrants who landed at New York, many philanthropic and benevolent

societies were formed for that purpose. Of those societies one Hiram

Huested gave the following testimony on oath: "I am sure, there is as

much iniquity amongst the emigrant societies as there is amongst the

runners."[301]

What with shipwrecks, what with deaths from famine, from fever, from

overcrowding; what with wholesale robbery, committed upon them at almost

every step of their journey, it is matter for great surprise indeed,

that even a remnant of the Famine-emigrants survived to locate

themselves in that far West, to which they fled in terror and dismay,

from their humble but loved and cherished homes, in the land of their

fathers. The Irish race get but little credit for industry or

perseverance; but in this they are most unjustly maligned, as many

testimonies already cited from friend and foe, clearly demonstrate. If

one more be wanting, I would point to a fact in the history of the

worn-out remnant of our Famine-emigrants, who had tenacity of life

enough to survive their endless hardships and journeyings. That fact

is, the large sums of money which, year after year, they sent to their

friends--every penny of which they earned by the sweat of their brow--by

their industry and perseverance.

Thus write the Commissioners of Emigration, in their thirty-first

General Report: "In 1870, as in former years, the amount sent home was

large, being £727,408 from North America, and £12,804 from Australia and

New Zealand. Of this sum there was remitted in prepaid passages to

Liverpool, Glasgow, and Londonderry, £332,638; more than was sufficient

to pay the passage money for all who emigrated that year! Imperfect as

our accounts are," continue the Commissioners, "they show that, in the

twenty three years from 1848 to 1870 inclusive, there has been sent home

from North America, through banks and commercial houses, upwards of

£16,334,000. Of what has been sent home through private channels we have

no account."[302]

A public writer, reviewing the Commissioners' Report, says: "Even this

vast sum does not represent more than the one half of the total sent

home. Much was brought over by captains of ships, by relatives, friends,

or by returning emigrants." No doubt, a great deal of money came through

private channels, but it is hardly credible, that another sixteen or

seventeen millions reached Ireland in that way. It is only guess-work,

to be sure, but if we add one-fourth to the sum named in the Report, as

the amount transmitted by private hand, it will probably bring us much

nearer the truth. This addition gives us, in all, £20,417,500.

There, then, is the one more testimony, that the Irish race lack neither

industry nor perseverance. For the lengthened period of three and twenty

years, something like £1,000,000 a-year have been transmitted to their

relatives and friends by the Irish in America. In three and twenty

years, they have sent home over TWENTY MILLIONS OF MONEY. Examine it;

weigh it; study it; in whatever way we look at this astounding

fact--whether we regard the magnitude of the sum, or the intense,

undying, all-pervading affection which it represents--it STANDS ALONE IN

THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.

FOOTNOTES:

[269] Census of Ireland for the decade of years ending 1851. Tables of

deaths, vol. I, p. 277. Quotation from _Dublin Quarterly Medical

Journal_.

[270] See "Census of Ireland, from 1841 to 1851." Tables of Deaths, vol.

1, p. 296.

[271] Dr. H. Kennedy, in _Dublin Quarterly Journal_.

[272] Census Returns.

[273] Those admissions increased to 110,381 in 1848.

[274] The percentage of deaths in the cholera, which succeeded to this

fever in 1849, was forty-two one-fifth.

[275] Census of Ireland for the year 1851. Report on tables of deaths.

[276] Report of Commissioners of Health.

[277] It is pleasant to know that the settlement at Peterborough has

continued to flourish, as the following extract from the late John F.

Maguire's "Irish in America" will show.--"The shanty, and the wigwam,

and the log-hut have long since given place to the mansion of brick and

stone; and the hand-sleigh and the rude cart to the strong waggon and

the well-appointed carriage. Where there was but one miserable grist

mill, there are now mills and factories of various kinds. And not only

are there spacious schools under the control of those who erected and

made use of them for their children, but the 'heavy grievance' which

existed in 1825 has long since been a thing of the past. The little

chapel of logs and shingle--18 feet by 20--in which the settlers of that

day knelt in gratitude to God, has for many years been replaced by a

noble stone church, through whose painted windows the Canadian sunlight

streams gloriously, and in which two thousand worshippers listen with

the old Irish reverence to the words of their pastor. The tones of the

pealing organs swell in solemn harmony, where the simple chaunt of the

first settlers was raised in the midst of the wilderness; and for miles

round may the voice of the great bell, swinging in its lofty tower, be

heard in the calm of the Lord's day, summoning the children of Saint

Patrick to worship in the faith of their fathers."--_The Irish in

America_, by John F. Maguire, M.P. London, 1868, p. 110.

[278] Quoted in Report of Committee of the House of Lords on

Colonization from Ireland in 1847, p. vii.

[279] Quoted in Report of Committee of the House of Lords on

"Colonization from Ireland" in 1847, p. 10.

[280] Sessional Papers, 1846, No. 24.

[281] Sessional Papers, 1835.

[282] The Census Commissioners, whose Emigration Statistics I use, do

not add the one and a-half per cent. for probable births; hence they

state the number of emigrants between 1831 and 1841 at 403,459 only.

[283] Census Returns for 1851--Tables of Deaths, p. 227-8.

[284] Census of Ireland for the year 1851--Report on Table of Deaths, p.

278. Thorn's Directory for 1848, p. 126.

[285] _Question_ 1790, and _Answer_.

[286] _Questions_ and _Answers_ 1797 and 1798.

[287] A million and a-half of emigrants was the number contemplated by

Mr. Godley's scheme, but his opinion was that there would be "a parallel

stream of half a million, drawn out by the attraction of the new Irish

colony, which, would make the whole emigration two millions."

The following is a list of those who signed the memorial for

colonization in Canada:--Archbishop Whately, the Marquis of Ormonde, the

Marquis of Ely, the Marquis of Sligo, the Marquis of Headfort, the Earl

of Devon, the Earl of Desart, the Earl of Rosse, the Earl of Lucan, the

Earl Fitzwilliam (modified assent), the Earl of Glengall, the Earl of

Limerick, Viscount Massareene, Viscount Adare, Viscount Castlemaine,

Lord Farnham, Lord Jocelyn, Lord Dunally, Lord Rossmore, Lord Oranmore,

Lord Blayney, Lord Clonbrock, Lord Wallscourt, Lord Courtney, Lord Gort,

Lord Sydney Osborne, Lord George Hill, Lord Stuart de Decies, Sir Walter

James, Bart., M.P., Rt. Hon. Sir A.J. Foster, Bart., Sir Charles Coote,

Bart., M.P., Sir Vere de Vere, Bart., Sir Michael Bellew, Bart., Sir

Thomas Staples, Bart., Sir Colman O'Loghlin, Bart., Sir Roger Palmer,

Bart., Sir Ralph Howard, Bart., Col. Wyndham, M.P., E.J. Shirley, Esq.,

M.P., Lieut.-Colonel Taylor, M.P., D.S. Kerr, Esq., M.P., W. Hutt, Esq.,

M.P., Rt. Hon. Colonel D. Darner, M.P., Alex. M'Carthy, Esq., M.P., R.B.

Osborne, Esq., M.P., Hon. James Maxwell, M.P., Major Layard, M.P., Jas.

H. Hamilton, Esq., M.P., M.J. O'Connell, Esq., M.P., W.H. Gregory, Esq.,

M.P., W.V. Stuart, Esq., M.P., B.J. Chapman, Esq., M.P., D.R. Mangles,

Esq., M.P., C.B. Adderley, Esq., M.P., W. Ormsby Gore, Esq., M.P., Hon.

Stephen Spring Rice, Hon. Standish Vereker, Hon. James Hewitt, Thomas

Fortescue, Esq., D.L., Major Blackball, D.L.; James Lendrum, Esq., D.L.;

T.J. Fetherstone Haugh, D.L., Mervyn Pratt, Esq., D.L., E. Housley,

Esq., D.L., Colonel A. Knox Gore, Lieut. Co. Sligo, George Vaughan

Jackson, Esq., D.L., R.M. Fox, Esq., D.L., Edward Cane, Esq., Charles

Hamilton, Esq., Charles S. Monck, Esq., William Monsell, Esq., Thomas S.

Carter, Esq., Charles W. Hamilton, Esq., Richard Bourke, Esq.,

Fetherstone Haugh O'Neill, Esq., John Vernon, Esq., George Lendrum,

Esq., Francis Latouche, Esq., Peter Latouche, Esq., John Robert

Godley.--_Report of House of Lords on Colonization from Ireland, p.

168._

[288] Public letter.

[289] Reply to M.J. O'Connell, Esq., M.P., W.H. Gregory, Esq., M.P., and

John R. Godley, Esq., Secretaries to the Canadian Colonization Scheme;

9th of April, 1847.

[290] Taken from Thom's Almanack for 1853, p. 252. The census of 1851

only gives the emigration for the first three months of that year. The

number of emigrants in 1852 was largely in excess of those of 1851.

[291] "At Quebec in particular, we read that 'the mortality is

appalling;' it was denominated The Ship Fever."--_British American

Journal_. "Upwards of £100,000 was expended in relieving the sick and

destitute emigrants landed in Canada in 1847."--Nicholls' History of the

Irish Poorlaw, p. 327--_note_.

[292] Dr. Stratten, in Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, quoted by

Census Commissioners for 1851 in p. 305 of their Report on Tables of

Deaths.

[293] "The Irish in America," by John Francis Maguire, p. 186.

[294] "Report of Commissioners of Emigration for the State of New York,"

quoted by Mr. Maguire.

[295] Dr. Stratten in "Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal."

[296] Twelve months' residence in Ireland during the Famine and the

Public Works: by William Henry Smith, C.E., late conducting engineer of

Public Works, p. 92.

[297] Report p. 27. Halliday pamphlets, vol. 1990.

[298] Report, pp. 29, 30.

[299] Report, pp. 33, 34.

[300] _Ib._, pp. 54, 55.

[301] _Ib._, p. 73.

[302] The report of the Emigration Commissioners for 1873 [just issued

28th October, 1874] gives the following facts. In the course of last

year 310,612 emigrants sailed from the ports of the United Kingdom,

being a larger number than in any year since 1854. Of these, 123,343

were English, 83,692 Irish, 21,310 Scotch, 72,198 Foreigners, who had

merely touched at British ports, and 10,929 whose nationality was not

ascertained. The remittances of Irish Emigrants to their friends at home

were as usual very large, the total sum being, according to the

information within reach of the Commissioners, £724,040. This includes

the remittances of both the United States and Canada. Of this sum

£341,722 came in the shape of prepaid passages, more than sufficient,

says the Report, to defray the cost of steerage passages at £6 6s. each

for the 83,692 Irish who emigrated within the year. _Thirty-first

General Report of the Emigration Commissioners, p. 4._

The History of the Great Irish Famine of 1847 (3rd ed.) (1902) With Notices of Earlier Irish Famines · 第 14 / 15 章