T.

* * * * *

No. 139. Thursday, August 9, 1711. Steele.

Vera Gloria radices agit, atque etiam propagatur: Ficta omnia

celeriter, tanquam flosculi, decidunt, nec simulatum potest

quidquam esse diuturnum.

Tull.

Of all the Affections which attend Human Life, the Love of Glory is the

most Ardent. According as this is Cultivated in Princes, it produces the

greatest Good or the greatest Evil. Where Sovereigns have it by

Impressions received from Education only, it creates an Ambitious rather

than a Noble Mind; where it is the natural Bent of the Prince's

Inclination, it prompts him to the Pursuit of Things truly Glorious. The

two greatest Men now in _Europe_ (according to the common Acceptation of

the Word _Great_) are _Lewis_ King of _France_, and _Peter_ Emperor of

_Russia_. As it is certain that all Fame does not arise from the

Practice of Virtue, it is, methinks, no unpleasing Amusement to examine

the Glory of these Potentates, and distinguish that which is empty,

perishing, and frivolous, from what is solid, lasting, and important.

_Lewis_ of _France_ had his Infancy attended by Crafty and Worldly Men,

who made Extent of Territory the most glorious [Instance [1]] of Power,

and mistook the spreading of Fame for the Acquisition of Honour. The

young Monarch's Heart was by such Conversation easily deluded into a

Fondness for Vain-glory, and upon these unjust Principles to form or

fall in with suitable Projects of Invasion, Rapine, Murder, and all the

Guilts that attend War when it is unjust. At the same time this Tyranny

was laid, Sciences and Arts were encouraged in the most generous Manner,

as if Men of higher Faculties were to be bribed to permit the Massacre

of the rest of the World. Every Superstructure which the Court of

_France_ built upon their first Designs, which were in themselves

vicious, was suitable to its false Foundation. The Ostentation of

Riches, the Vanity of Equipage, Shame of Poverty, and Ignorance of

Modesty, were the common Arts of Life: The generous Love of one Woman

was changed into Gallantry for all the Sex, and Friendships among Men

turned into Commerces of Interest, or mere Professions. _While these

were the Rules of Life, Perjuries in the Prince, and a general

Corruption of Manners in the Subject, were the Snares in which_ France

_has Entangled all her Neighbours._ With such false Colours have the

Eyes of _Lewis_ been enchanted, from the Debauchery of his early Youth,

to the Superstition of his present old Age. Hence it is, that he has the

Patience to have Statues erected to his Prowess, his Valour, his

Fortitude; and in the Softnesses and Luxury of a Court, to be applauded

for Magnanimity and Enterprize in Military Atchievements.

_Peter Alexiwitz_ of _Russia_, when he came to Years of Manhood, though

he found himself Emperor of a vast and numerous People, Master of an

endless Territory, absolute Commander of the Lives and Fortunes of his

Subjects, in the midst of this unbounded Power and Greatness turned his

Thoughts upon Himself and People with Sorrow. Sordid Ignorance and a

Brute Manner of Life this Generous Prince beheld and contemned from the

Light of his own _Genius_. His Judgment suggested this to him, and his

Courage prompted him to amend it. In order to this he did not send to

the Nation from whence the rest of the World has borrowed its

Politeness, but himself left his Diadem to learn the true Way to Glory

and Honour, and Application to useful Arts, wherein to employ the

Laborious, the Simple, the Honest part of his People. Mechanick

Employments and Operations were very justly the first Objects of his

Favour and Observation. With this glorious Intention he travelled into

Foreign Nations in an obscure Manner, above receiving little Honours

where he sojourned, but prying into what was of more Consequence, their

Arts of Peace and of War. By this means has this great Prince laid the

Foundation of a great and lasting Fame, by personal Labour, personal

Knowledge, personal Valour. It would be Injury to any of Antiquity to

name them with him. Who, but himself, ever left a Throne to learn to sit

in it with more Grace? Who ever thought himself mean in Absolute

Power, 'till he had learned to use it?

If we consider this wonderful Person, it is Perplexity to know where to

begin his Encomium. Others may in a Metaphorical or Philosophick Sense

be said to command themselves, but this Emperor is also literally under

his own Command. How generous and how good was his entring his own Name

as a private Man in the Army he raised, that none in it might expect to

out-run the Steps with which he himself advanced! By such Measures this

god-like Prince learned to Conquer, learned to use his Conquests. How

terrible has he appeared in Battel, how gentle in Victory? Shall then

the base Arts of the _Frenchman_ be held Polite, and the honest Labours

of the _Russian_ Barbarous? No: Barbarity is the Ignorance of true

Honour, or placing any thing instead of it. The unjust Prince is Ignoble

and Barbarous, the good Prince only Renowned and Glorious.

Tho' Men may impose upon themselves what they please by their corrupt

Imaginations, Truth will ever keep its Station; and as Glory is nothing

else but the Shadow of Virtue, it will certainly disappear at the

Departure of Virtue. But how carefully ought the true Notions of it to

be preserved, and how industrious should we be to encourage any Impulses

towards it? The _Westminster_ School-boy that said the other Day he

could not sleep or play for the Colours in the Hall, [2] ought to be

free from receiving a Blow for ever.

But let us consider what is truly Glorious according to the Author I

have to day quoted in the Front of my Paper.

The Perfection of Glory, says _Tully_, [3] consists in these three

Particulars: _That the People love us; that they have Confidence in us;

that being affected with a certain Admiration towards us, they think we

deserve Honour_.

This was spoken of Greatness in a Commonwealth: But if one were to form

a Notion of Consummate Glory under our Constitution, one must add to the

above-mentioned Felicities a certain necessary Inexistence, and

Disrelish of all the rest, without the Prince's Favour.

He should, methinks, have Riches, Power, Honour, Command, Glory; but

Riches, Power, Honour, Command and Glory should have no Charms, but as

accompanied with the Affection of his Prince. He should, methinks, be

Popular because a Favourite, and a Favourite because Popular.

Were it not to make the Character too imaginary, I would give him

Sovereignty over some Foreign Territory, and make him esteem that an

empty Addition without the kind Regards of his own Prince.

One may merely have an _Idea_ of a Man thus composed and

circumstantiated, and if he were so made for Power without an Incapacity

of giving Jealousy, he would be also Glorious, without Possibility of

receiving Disgrace. This Humility and this Importance must make his

Glory immortal.

These Thoughts are apt to draw me beyond the usual Length of this Paper,

but if I could suppose such Rhapsodies cou'd outlive the common Fate of

ordinary things, I would say these Sketches and Faint Images of Glory

were drawn in _August, 1711,_ when _John__ Duke of _Marlborough_ made

that memorable March wherein he took the French Lines without Bloodshed.

The Spectator, Volume 1 Eighteenth-Century Periodical Essays · 第 267 / 351 题