L.

[Footnote 1: Thomas Tyers in his 'Historical Essay on Mr. Addison'

(1783) first named Sir John Pakington, of Westwood, Worcestershire, as

the original of Sir Roger de Coverley. But there is no real parallel.

Sir John, as Mr. W. H. Wills has pointed out in his delightful annotated

collection of the Sir Roger de Coverley papers, was twice married, a

barrister, Recorder of the City of Worcester, and M. P. for his native

county, in every Parliament but one, from his majority till his death.

The name of Roger of Coverley applied to a 'contre-danse' (i.e. a dance

in which partners stand in opposite rows) Anglicised Country-Dance, was

ascribed to the house of Calverley in Yorkshire, by an ingenious member

thereof, Ralph Thoresby, who has left a MS. account of the family

written in 1717. Mr. Thoresby has it that Sir Roger of Calverley in the

time of Richard I had a harper who was the composer of this tune; his

evidence being, apparently, that persons of the name of Harper had lands

in the neighbourhood of Calverley. Mr. W. Chappell, who repeats this

statement in his 'Popular Music of the Olden Time,' says that in a MS.

of the beginning of the last century, this tune is called 'Old Roger of

Coverlay for evermore. A Lancashire Hornpipe.' In the 'Dancing Master'

of 1696. it is called 'Roger of Coverly.' Mr. Chappell quotes also, in

illustration of the familiar knowledge of this tune and its name in

Addison's time, from 'the History of Robert Powell, the Puppet Showman

(1715),' that

"upon the Preludis being ended, each party fell to bawling and calling

for particular tunes. The hobnail'd fellows, whose breeches and lungs

seem'd to be of the same leather, cried out for 'Cheshire Rounds,

Roger of Coverly'," &c.]

[Footnote 2: I required]

[Footnote 3: that]

[Footnote 4: Archbishop Tillotson's Sermons appeared in 14 volumes,

small 8vo, published at intervals; the first in 1671; the second in

1678; the third in 1682; the fourth in 1694; and the others after his

death in that year. Robert Sanderson, who died in 1663, was a friend of

Laud and chaplain to Charles I., who made him Regius Professor of

Divinity at Oxford. At the Restoration he was made Bishop of Lincoln.

His fame was high for piety and learning. The best edition of his

Sermons was the eighth, published in 1687: Thirty-six Sermons, with Life

by Izaak Walton. Isaac Barrow, Theologian and Mathematician, Cambridge

Professor and Master of Trinity, died in 1677. His Works were edited by

Archbishop Tillotson, and include Sermons that must have been very much

to the mind of Sir Roger de Coverley, 'Against Evil Speaking.' Edmund

Calamy, who died in 1666, was a Nonconformist, and one of the writers of

the Treatise against Episcopacy called, from the Initials of its

authors, Smeetymnuus, which Bishop Hall attacked and John Milton

defended. Calamy opposed the execution of Charles I. and aided in

bringing about the Restoration. He became chaplain to Charles II., but

the Act of Uniformity again made him a seceder. His name, added to the

other three, gives breadth to the suggestion of Sir Roger's orthodoxy.

* * * * *

No. 107. Tuesday, July 3, 1711. Steele.

'Æsopo ingentem statuam posuere Attici,

Servumque collocârunt Æterna in Basi,

Patere honoris scirent ut Cuncti viam.'

Phæd.

The Reception, manner of Attendance, undisturbed Freedom and Quiet,

which I meet with here in the Country, has confirm'd me in the Opinion I

always had, that the general Corruption of Manners in Servants is owing

to the Conduct of Masters. The Aspect of every one in the Family carries

so much Satisfaction, that it appears he knows the happy Lot which has

befallen him in being a Member of it. There is one Particular which I

have seldom seen but at Sir ROGER'S; it is usual in all other Places,

that Servants fly from the Parts of the House through which their Master

is passing; on the contrary, here they industriously place themselves in

his way; and it is on both Sides, as it were, understood as a Visit,

when the Servants appear without calling. This proceeds from the humane

and equal Temper of the Man of the House, who also perfectly well knows

how to enjoy a great Estate, with such Oeconomy as ever to be much

beforehand. This makes his own Mind untroubled, and consequently unapt

to vent peevish Expressions, or give passionate or inconsistent Orders

to those about him. Thus Respect and Love go together; and a certain

Chearfulness in Performance of their Duty is the particular Distinction

of the lower Part of this Family. When a Servant is called before his

Master, he does not come with an Expectation to hear himself rated for

some trivial Fault, threatned to be stripped, or used with any other

unbecoming Language, which mean Masters often give to worthy Servants;

but it is often to know, what Road he took that he came so readily back

according to Order; whether he passed by such a Ground, if the old Man

who rents it is in good Health: or whether he gave Sir ROGER'S Love to

him, or the like.

A Man who preserves a Respect, founded on his Benevolence to his

Dependants, lives rather like a Prince than a Master in his Family; his

Orders are received as Favours, rather than Duties; and the Distinction

of approaching him is Part of the Reward for executing what is commanded

by him.

There is another Circumstance in which my Friend excells in his

Management, which is the Manner of rewarding his Servants: He has ever

been of Opinion, that giving his cast Cloaths to be worn by Valets has a

very ill Effect upon little Minds, and creates a Silly Sense of Equality

between the Parties, in Persons affected only with outward things. I

have heard him often pleasant on this Occasion, and describe a young

Gentleman abusing his Man in that Coat, which a Month or two before was

the most pleasing Distinction he was conscious of in himself. He would

turn his Discourse still more pleasantly upon the Ladies Bounties of

this kind; and I have heard him say he knew a fine Woman, who

distributed Rewards and punishments in giving becoming or unbecoming

Dresses to her Maids.

But my good Friend is above these little Instances of Goodwill, in

bestowing only Trifles on his Servants; a good Servant to him is sure of

having it in his Choice very soon of being no Servant at all. As I

before observed, he is so good an Husband, and knows so thoroughly that

the Skill of the Purse is the Cardinal Virtue of this Life; I say, he

knows so well that Frugality is the Support of Generosity, that he can

often spare a large Fine when a Tenement falls, and give that Settlement

to a good Servant who has a Mind to go into the World, or make a

Stranger pay the Fine to that Servant, for his more comfortable

Maintenance, if he stays in his Service.

A Man of Honour and Generosity considers, it would be miserable to

himself to have no Will but that of another, tho' it were of the best

Person breathing, and for that Reason goes on as fast as he is able to

put his Servants into independent Livelihoods. The greatest Part of Sir

ROGER'S Estate is tenanted by Persons who have served himself or his

Ancestors. It was to me extreamly pleasant to observe the Visitants from

several Parts to welcome his Arrival into the Country: and all the

Difference that I could take notice of between the late Servants who

came to see him, and those who staid in the Family, was that these

latter were looked upon as finer Gentlemen and better Courtiers.

This Manumission and placing them in a way of Livelihood, I look upon as

only what is due to a good Servant, which Encouragement will make his

Successor be as diligent, as humble, and as ready as he was. There is

something wonderful in the Narrowness of those Minds, which can be

pleased, and be barren of Bounty to those who please them.

One might, on this Occasion, recount the Sense that Great Persons in all

Ages have had of the Merit of their Dependants, and the Heroick Services

which Men have done their Masters in the Extremity of their Fortunes;

and shewn to their undone Patrons, that Fortune was all the Difference

between them; but as I design this my Speculation only [as a [1]] gentle

Admonition to thankless Masters, I shall not go out of the Occurrences

of Common Life, but assert it as a general Observation, that I never

saw, but in Sir ROGER'S Family, and one or two more, good Servants

treated as they ought to be. Sir ROGER'S Kindness extends to their

Children's Children, and this very Morning he sent his Coachman's

Grandson to Prentice. I shall conclude this Paper with an Account of a

Picture in his Gallery, where there are many which will deserve my

future Observation.

At the very upper end of this handsome Structure I saw the Portraiture

of two young Men standing in a River, the one naked, the other in a

Livery. The Person supported seemed half dead, but still so much alive

as to shew in his Face exquisite Joy and Love towards the other. I

thought the fainting Figure resembled my Friend Sir ROGER; and looking

at the Butler, who stood by me, for an Account of it, he informed me

that the Person in the Livery was a Servant of Sir ROGER'S, who stood on

the Shore while his Master was swimming, and observing him taken with

some sudden Illness, and sink under Water, jumped in and saved him. He

told me Sir ROGER took off the Dress he was in as soon as he came home,

and by a great Bounty at that time, followed by his Favour ever since,

had made him Master of that pretty Seat which we saw at a distance as we

came to this House. I remember'd indeed Sir ROGER said there lived a

very worthy Gentleman, to whom he was highly obliged, without mentioning

anything further. Upon my looking a little dissatisfy'd at some Part of

the Picture my Attendant informed me that it was against Sir ROGER'S

Will, and at the earnest Request of the Gentleman himself, that he was

drawn in the Habit in which he had saved his Master.

The Spectator, Volume 1 Eighteenth-Century Periodical Essays · 第 234 / 351 题