Per. 'Sat. 3.'

Several kinds of false Wit that vanished in the refined Ages of the

World, discovered themselves again in the Times of Monkish Ignorance.

As the Monks were the Masters of all that little Learning which was then

extant, and had their whole Lives entirely disengaged from Business, it

is no wonder that several of them, who wanted Genius for higher

Performances, employed many Hours in the Composition of such Tricks in

Writing as required much Time and little Capacity. I have seen half the

_Æneid_ turned into _Latin_ Rhymes by one of the _Beaux Esprits_ of that

dark Age; who says in his Preface to it, that the _Æneid_ wanted nothing

but the Sweets of Rhyme to make it the most perfect Work in its Kind. I

have likewise seen an Hymn in Hexameters to the Virgin _Mary,_ which

filled a whole Book, tho' it consisted but of the eight following Words.

_Tot, tibi, sunt, Virgo, dotes, quot, sidera, Caelo._

Thou hast as many Virtues, O Virgin, as there are Stars in Heaven.

The Poet rung the [changes [1]] upon these eight several Words, and by

that Means made his Verses almost as numerous as the Virtues and the

Stars which they celebrated. It is no wonder that Men who had so much

Time upon their Hands did not only restore all the antiquated Pieces of

false Wit, but enriched the World with Inventions of their own. It was

to this Age that we owe the Production of Anagrams,[2] which is nothing

else but a Transmutation of one Word into another, or the turning of the

same Set of Letters into different Words; which may change Night into

Day, or Black into White, if Chance, who is the Goddess that presides

over these Sorts of Composition, shall so direct. I remember a witty

Author, in Allusion to this kind of Writing, calls his Rival, who (it

seems) was distorted, and had his Limbs set in Places that did not

properly belong to them, _The Anagram of a Man_.

When the Anagrammatist takes a Name to work upon, he considers it at

first as a Mine not broken up, which will not shew the treasure it

contains till he shall have spent many Hours in the Search of it: For it

is his Business to find out one Word that conceals it self in another,

and to examine the Letters in all the Variety of Stations in which they

can possibly be ranged. I have heard of a Gentleman who, when this Kind

of Wit was in fashion, endeavoured to gain his Mistress's Heart by it.

She was one of the finest Women of her Age, and [known [3]] by the Name

of the Lady _Mary Boon_. The Lover not being able to make any thing of

_Mary_, by certain Liberties indulged to this kind of Writing, converted

it into _Moll_; and after having shut himself up for half a Year, with

indefatigable Industry produced an Anagram. Upon the presenting it to

his Mistress, who was a little vexed in her Heart to see herself

degraded into _Moll Boon_, she told him, to his infinite Surprise, that

he had mistaken her Sirname, for that it was not _Boon_ but _Bohun_.

_... Ibi omnis

Effusus labor ..._

The lover was thunder-struck with his Misfortune, insomuch that in a

little time after he lost his Senses, which indeed had been very much

impaired by that continual Application he had given to his Anagram.

The Acrostick [4] was probably invented about the same time with the

Anagram, tho' it is impossible to decide whether the Inventor of the one

of the other [were [5]] the greater Blockhead. The _Simple_ Acrostick is

nothing but the Name or Title of a Person or Thing made out of the

initial Letters of several Verses, and by that Means written, after the

Manner of the _Chinese_, in a perpendicular Line. But besides these

there are _Compound_ Acrosticks, where the principal Letters stand two

or three deep. I have seen some of them where the Verses have not only

been edged by a Name at each Extremity, but have had the same Name

running down like a Seam through the Middle of the Poem.

There is another near Relation of the Anagrams and Acrosticks, which is

commonly [called [6]] a Chronogram. This kind of Wit appears very often

on many modern Medals, especially those of _Germany_, [7] when they

represent in the Inscription the Year in which they were coined. Thus we

see on a Medal of _Gustavus Adolphus_ the following Words, CHRISTVS DUX

ERGO TRIVMPHVS. If you take the pains to pick the Figures out of the

several Words, and range them in their proper Order, you will find they

amount to MDCXVVVII, or 1627, the Year in which the Medal was stamped:

For as some of the Letters distinguish themselves from the rest, and

overtop their Fellows, they are to be considered in a double Capacity,

both as Letters and as Figures. Your laborious _German_ Wits will turn

over a whole Dictionary for one of these ingenious Devices. A Man would

think they were searching after an apt classical Term, but instead of

that they are looking out a Word that has an L, and M, or a D in it.

When therefore we meet with any of these Inscriptions, we are not so

much to look in 'em for the Thought, as for the Year of the Lord.

The _Boutz Rimez_ [8] were the Favourites of the _French_ Nation for a

whole Age together, and that at a Time when it abounded in Wit and

Learning. They were a List of Words that rhyme to one another, drawn up

by another Hand, and given to a Poet, who was to make a Poem to the

Rhymes in the same Order that they were placed upon the List: The more

uncommon the Rhymes were, the more extraordinary was the Genius of the

Poet that could accommodate his Verses to them. I do not know any

greater Instance of the Decay of Wit and Learning among the _French_

(which generally follows the Declension of Empire) than the endeavouring

to restore this foolish Kind of Wit. If the Reader will be at the

trouble to see Examples of it, let him look into the new _Mercure

Galant_; where the Author every Month gives a List of Rhymes to be

filled up by the Ingenious, in order to be communicated to the Publick

in the _Mercure_ for the succeeding Month. That for the Month of

_November_ [last], which now lies before me, is as follows.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Lauriers

- - - - - - - - - - - - Guerriers

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Musette

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Lisette

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cesars

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Etendars

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Houlette

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -Folette

One would be amazed to see so learned a Man as _Menage_ talking

seriously on this Kind of Trifle in the following Passage.

_Monsieur_ de la Chambre _has told me that he never knew what he was

going to write when he took his Pen into his Hand; but that one

Sentence always produced another. For my own part, I never knew what I

should write next when I was making Verses. In the first place I got

all my Rhymes together, and was afterwards perhaps three or four

Months in filling them up. I one Day shewed Monsieur_ Gombaud _a

Composition of this Nature, in which among others I had made use of

the four following Rhymes,_ Amaryllis, Phillis, Marne, Arne,_ desiring

him to give me his Opinion of it. He told me immediately, that my

Verses were good for nothing. And upon my asking his Reason, he said,

Because the Rhymes are too common; and for that Reason easy to be put

into Verse. Marry, says I, if it be so, I am very well rewarded for

all the Pains I have been at. But by Monsieur_ Gombaud's _Leave,

notwithstanding the Severity of the Criticism, the Verses were good._

Vid. MENAGIANA. Thus far the learned _Menage,_ whom I have translated

Word for Word. [9]

The first Occasion of these _Bouts Rimez_ made them in some manner

excusable, as they were Tasks which the _French_ Ladies used to impose

on their Lovers. But when a grave Author, like him above-mentioned,

tasked himself, could there be anything more ridiculous? Or would not

one be apt to believe that the Author played [booty [10]], and did not

make his List of Rhymes till he had finished his Poem?

I shall only add, that this Piece of false Wit has been finely ridiculed

by Monsieur _Sarasin,_ in a Poem intituled, _La Defaite des Bouts-Rimez,

The Rout of the Bouts-Rimez._ [11]

I must subjoin to this last kind of Wit the double Rhymes, which are

used in Doggerel Poetry, and generally applauded by ignorant Readers. If

the Thought of the Couplet in such Compositions is good, the Rhyme adds

[little [12]] to it; and if bad, it will not be in the Power of the

Rhyme to recommend it. I am afraid that great Numbers of those who

admire the incomparable _Hudibras_, do it more on account of these

Doggerel Rhymes than of the Parts that really deserve admiration. I am

sure I have heard the

Pulpit, Drum Ecclesiastick,

Was beat with fist instead of a Stick,

and

There was an ancient sage Philosopher

Who had read Alexander Ross over,

more frequently quoted, than the finest Pieces of Wit in the whole Poem.

The Spectator, Volume 1 Eighteenth-Century Periodical Essays · 第 171 / 351 题