C.

[Footnote 1: Albertus Magnus, a learned Dominican who resigned, for love

of study, his bishopric of Ratisbon, died at Cologne in 1280. In alchemy

a distinction was made between stone and spirit, as between body and

soul, substance and accident. The evaporable parts were called, in

alchemy, spirit and soul and accident.]

[Footnote 2: See No. 50.]

[Footnote 3: described]

[Footnote 4: an]

[Footnote 5: that]

* * * * *

No. 57. Saturday, May 5, 1711. Addison.

'Quem præstare potest mulier galeata pudorem,

Quæ fugit à Sexu!'

Juv.

When the Wife of _Hector_, in _Homer's Iliads_, discourses with her

Husband about the Battel in which he was going to engage, the Hero,

desiring her to leave that Matter to his Care, bids her go to her Maids

and mind her Spinning: [1] by which the Poet intimates, that Men and

Women ought to busy themselves in their proper Spheres, and on such

Matters only as are suitable to their respective Sex.

I am at this time acquainted with a young Gentleman, who has passed a

great Part of his Life in the Nursery, and, upon Occasion, can make a

Caudle or a Sack-Posset better than any Man in _England_. He is likewise

a wonderful Critick in Cambrick and Muslins, and will talk an Hour

together upon a Sweet-meat. He entertains his Mother every Night with

Observations that he makes both in Town and Court: As what Lady shews

the nicest Fancy in her Dress; what Man of Quality wears the fairest

Whig; who has the finest Linnen, who the prettiest Snuff-box, with many

other the like curious Remarks that may be made in good Company.

On the other hand I have very frequently the Opportunity of seeing a

Rural _Andromache_, who came up to Town last Winter, and is one of the

greatest Fox-hunters in the Country. She talks of Hounds and Horses, and

makes nothing of leaping over a Six-bar Gate. If a Man tells her a

waggish Story, she gives him a Push with her Hand in jest, and calls him

an impudent Dog; and if her Servant neglects his Business, threatens to

kick him out of the House. I have heard her, in her Wrath, call a

Substantial Trades-man a Lousy Cur; and remember one Day, when she could

not think of the Name of a Person, she described him in a large Company

of Men and Ladies, by the Fellow with the Broad Shoulders.

If those Speeches and Actions, which in their own Nature are

indifferent, appear ridiculous when they proceed from a wrong Sex, the

Faults and Imperfections of one Sex transplanted into another, appear

black and monstrous. As for the Men, I shall not in this Paper any

further concern my self about them: but as I would fain contribute to

make Womankind, which is the most beautiful Part of the Creation,

entirely amiable, and wear out all those little Spots and Blemishes that

are apt to rise among the Charms which Nature has poured out upon them,

I shall dedicate this Paper to their Service. The Spot which I would

here endeavour to clear them of, is that Party-Rage which of late Years

is very much crept into their Conversation. This is, in its Nature, a

Male Vice, and made up of many angry and cruel Passions that are

altogether repugnant to the Softness, the Modesty, and those other

endearing Qualities which are natural to the Fair Sex. Women were formed

to temper Mankind, and sooth them into Tenderness and Compassion, not to

set an Edge upon their Minds, and blow up in them those Passions which

are too apt to rise of their own Accord. When I have seen a pretty Mouth

uttering Calumnies and Invectives, what would not I have given to have

stopt it? How have I been troubled to see some of the finest Features in

the World grow pale, and tremble with Party-Rage? _Camilla_ is one of

the greatest Beauties in the _British_ Nation, and yet values her self

more upon being the _Virago_ of one Party, than upon being the Toast of

both. The Dear Creature, about a Week ago, encountered the fierce and

beautiful _Penthesilea_ across a Tea-Table; but in the Height of her

Anger, as her Hand chanced to shake with the Earnestness of the Dispute,

she scalded her Fingers, and spilt a Dish of Tea upon her Petticoat. Had

not this Accident broke off the Debate, no Body knows where it would

have ended.

There is one Consideration which I would earnestly recommend to all my

Female Readers, and which, I hope, will have some weight with them. In

short, it is this, that there is nothing so bad for the Face as

Party-Zeal. It gives an ill-natured Cast to the Eye, and a disagreeable

Sourness to the Look; besides, that it makes the Lines too strong, and

flushes them worse than Brandy. I have seen a Woman's Face break out in

Heats, as she has been talking against a great Lord, whom she had never

seen in her Life; and indeed never knew a Party-Woman that kept her

Beauty for a Twelvemonth. I would therefore advise all my Female

Readers, as they value their Complexions, to let alone all Disputes of

this Nature; though, at the same time, I would give free Liberty to all

superannuated motherly Partizans to be as violent as they please, since

there will be no Danger either of their spoiling their Faces, or of

their gaining Converts.

[2] For my own part, I think a Man makes an odious and despicable

Figure, that is violent in a Party: but a Woman is too sincere to

mitigate the Fury of her Principles with Temper and Discretion, and to

act with that Caution and Reservedness which are requisite in our Sex.

When this unnatural Zeal gets into them, it throws them into ten

thousand Heats and Extravagancies; their generous [Souls [3]] set no

Bounds to their Love or to their Hatred; and whether a Whig or Tory, a

Lap-Dog or a Gallant, an Opera or a Puppet-Show, be the Object of it,

the Passion, while it reigns, engrosses the whole Woman.

I remember when Dr. _Titus Oates_ [4] was in all his Glory, I

accompanied my Friend WILL. [HONEYCOMB] [5] in a Visit to a Lady of his

Acquaintance: We were no sooner sat down, but upon casting my Eyes about

the Room, I found in almost every Corner of it a Print that represented

the Doctor in all Magnitudes and Dimensions. A little after, as the Lady

was discoursing my Friend, and held her Snuff-box in her Hand, who

should I see in the Lid of it but the Doctor. It was not long after

this, when she had Occasion for her Handkerchief, which upon the first

opening discovered among the Plaits of it the Figure of the Doctor. Upon

this my Friend WILL., who loves Raillery, told her, That if he was in

Mr. _Truelove's_ Place (for that was the Name for her Husband) she

should be made as uneasy by a Handkerchief as ever _Othello_ was. _I am

afraid,_ said she, _Mr._ [HONEYCOMB,[6]] _you are a Tory; tell me truly,

are you a Friend to the Doctor or not?_ WILL., instead of making her a

Reply, smiled in her Face (for indeed she was very pretty) and told her

that one of her Patches was dropping off. She immediately adjusted it,

and looking a little seriously, _Well_, says she, _I'll be hang'd if you

and your silent Friend there are not against the Doctor in your Hearts,

I suspected as much by his saying nothing_. Upon this she took her Fan

into her Hand, and upon the opening of it again displayed to us the

Figure of the Doctor, who was placed with great Gravity among the Sticks

of it. In a word, I found that the Doctor had taken Possession of her

Thoughts, her Discourse, and most of her Furniture; but finding my self

pressed too close by her Question, I winked upon my Friend to take his

Leave, which he did accordingly.

The Spectator, Volume 1 Eighteenth-Century Periodical Essays · 第 168 / 351 题