SIR,

'You proposed, in your SPECTATOR of last _Tuesday_, Mr. _Hobbs's_

Hypothesis for solving that very odd Phænomenon of Laughter. You have

made the Hypothesis valuable by espousing it your self; for had it

continued Mr. _Hobbs's_, no Body would have minded it. Now here this

perplexed Case arises. A certain Company laughed very heartily upon

the Reading of that very Paper of yours: And the Truth on it is, he

must be a Man of more than ordinary Constancy that could stand it out

against so much Comedy, and not do as we did. Now there are few Men in

the World so far lost to all good Sense, as to look upon you to be a

Man in a State of Folly _inferior to himself_. Pray then how do you

justify your Hypothesis of Laughter?

Thursday, the 26th of

the Month of Fools.

Your most humble,

The Spectator, Volume 1 Eighteenth-Century Periodical Essays · 第 148 / 351 题