A RAILWAY REVOLUTION!
[Illustration]
ROYAL RAILWAYS
FARES & RATES
FOR ANY DISTANCE.
LOCAL TRAINS ONE PENNY
MAIN LINE ” ONE SHILLING
SLOW GOODS average } 1s. 6d.
FAST ” per ton } 10s.
A business proposition for Shareholders
and the Nation.
_Sixpence Nett._
SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, HAMILTON, KENT & CO., LTD.,
LONDON
ROYAL RAILWAYS
with Uniform Rates
_by_
WHATELY C. ARNOLD, LL.B. LOND.
_A PROPOSAL
for amalgamation of Railways with the
General Post Office and adoption of
uniform fares and rates for any distance._
LONDON: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL,
HAMILTON, KENT & CO., LTD
1914
_Preface._
This pamphlet has been printed and published with the assistance of
friends who share my opinion that the scheme proposed will solve the
railway problem--now at an acute stage.
A rough outline of the Scheme has been submitted to Sir Charles
Cameron, Bart. (on whose initiative sixpenny telegrams were adopted),
and while reserving his opinion as to the advantages of State ownership
and the difficulties of purchase, he has been good enough to write
that this scheme is the boldest and best reasoned plea for the
Nationalisation of Railways that he has come across.
The scheme has also been submitted to, among others, Mr. Emil Davies,
Chairman of the Railway Nationalisation Society, to Mr. L. G. Chiozza
Money, M.P., and to Mr. Philip Snowden, M.P., all of whom have
expressed their approval subject to the figures and estimates being
correct. These figures and estimates are based on the Official Board of
Trade returns for Railways of 1911 and 1912.
I also had the temerity to submit my draft to Mr. W. M. Acworth, the
well-known Railway expert, who very courteously gave me his views
generally, although refraining from any detailed criticism. I deal
with his remarks at the end of Chapter IV., but may here mention that
Mr. Acworth called my attention to an article by himself on Railways
in “Palgrave’s Encyclopædia of Political Economy” published in 1899.
In such article he referred to a suggestion which had then been made
for uniform fares on the Postal system, and he dismissed the idea in a
sentence as impracticable, because no one would pay for a short journey
as much as 8d., then the average fare for the whole country.
It is therefore evident that the principle of a flat rate is not novel;
yet I can find no reference in any books or pamphlets on railways to
any practical scheme for carrying it into effect. Apparently it has
been assumed that there can be only one uniform rate, equivalent to the
average rate, and that therefore the proposal is quite impossible. The
simple expedient of dividing the traffic into the two kinds of “Fast”
and “Slow,” on the analogy of the Postal rate of one penny for letters
and sixpence for telegrams, overcomes this difficulty. The scheme is
in effect an extension to the Railway System of the principle upon
which the existing Postal System is founded, and therefore involves
Nationalisation.
As submitted to the above-named gentlemen, the draft did not include
my remarks on the principles which in my opinion should govern all
National and Municipal Trading, and which are now contained in Chapter
IV. The attention of both opponents and advocates of Nationalisation
is particularly called to these principles, which I have not found
elsewhere, but which as laid down are believed to be absolutely sound,
and of the highest importance, as removing most, if not all, of the
objections of opponents, while retaining all the advantages claimed by
advocates of National and Municipal Trading.
I do not pretend to be a railway expert, and have only been able to
devote the small leisure time available from an exacting business to
putting into writing the thoughts which have exercised my mind for many
years past. But the well-known expert, Mr. Edwin A. Pratt, who is a
strong opponent of Railway Nationalisation, admits in one of his books
that “the greatest advances made by the Post Office have been due to
the persistence of outside and far-seeing reformers, rather than to the
Postal Officials themselves.” This admission and the conviction that
the further advance now proposed is based upon sound principles and
undisputed facts, encourages me to submit my scheme with confidence to
the consideration of experts and the public.
W. C. A.
37, NORFOLK STREET,
STRAND, LONDON, W.C.
DECEMBER, 1913.
SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS
PROPOSED UNIFORM FARES AND RATES:
=Passenger Fares=: Any Distance, so far as train travels.
_Main Lines_: =First Class 5/-=, =Third Class 1/-=.
_Local Lines_: ” =6d.= ” =1d.=
=Goods Rates=: Any Distance.
_Fast Service_: =Average 10/- per ton=.
_Slow Service_: ” =1/6= ”
=Introduction.= Page 15.
The Royal Mail.--Letters carried for same price any distance. Why
not passengers and goods? Object of pamphlet to prove that this is
financially possible with small uniform fares and rates mentioned. A
Business Proposition for Nation and Shareholders.
CHAPTER I.
=The Scheme.= Page 17.
=All Railways= to be purchased by State and amalgamated with General
Post Office. Trains of two kinds only, viz.:--
(1) =Main Line Trains=, _i.e._, non-stop for at least 30 miles.
(2) =Local Trains=, _i.e._, all trains other than Main Line.
=Passenger tickets= vary according to above fares only--no reference
to stations or distance. =Goods rates=, payable by stamps vary only
according to weight or size of goods, whether carried in bulk, in open
or closed trucks, or with special packing, but irrespective of any
other difference in nature or value of goods, or of distance, as now
with parcel post.
=All Railway Stations to be Post Offices.= All Post Offices to sell
Railway Tickets, and, where required, to be Railway Receiving Offices.
=Steamers= to be regarded as trains.