MR. WATTERSON TO MR. CLEVELAND

Courier-Journal Office, Louisville, July 9, 1892.—My Dear Mr.

President: I inclose you two editorial articles from the

Courier-Journal, and, that their spirit and purpose may not be

misunderstood by you, I wish to add a word or two of a kind directly

and entirely personal.

To a man of your robust understanding and strong will, opposition and

criticism are apt to be taken as more or less unfriendly; and, as you

are at present advised, I can hardly expect that any words of mine will

be received by you with sentiments either of confidence or favor.

I was admonished by a certain distrust, if not disdain, visited upon

the honest challenge I ventured to offer your Civil Service policy,

when you were actually in office, that you did not differ from some

other great men I have known in an unwillingness, or at least an

inability, to accept, without resentment, the question of your

infallibility. Nevertheless, I was then, as I am now, your friend, and

not your enemy, animated by the single purpose to serve the country,

through you, as, wanting your great opportunities, I could not serve it

through myself.

During the four years when you were President, I asked you but for one

thing that lay near my heart. You granted that handsomely; and, if you

had given me all you had to give beside, you could not have laid me

under greater obligation. It is a gratification to me to know, and it

ought to be some warrant both of my intelligence and fidelity for you

to remember that that matter resulted in credit to the Administration

and benefit to the public service.

But to the point; I had at St. Louis in 1888 and at Chicago, the

present year, to oppose what was represented as your judgment and

desire in the adoption of a tariff plank in our national platform;

successfully in both cases. The inclosed articles set forth the reasons

forcing upon me a different conclusion from yours, in terms that may

appear to you bluntly specific, but I hope not personally offensive;

certainly not by intention, for, whilst I would not suppress the truth

to please you or any man, I have a decent regard for the sensibilities

and the rights of all men, particularly of men so eminent as to be

beyond the reach of anything except insolence and injustice. Assuredly

in your case, I am incapable of even so much as the covert thought of

either, entertaining for you absolute respect and regard. But, my dear

Mr. President, I do not think that you appreciate the overwhelming

force of the revenue reform issue, which has made you its idol.

[Illustration: A Corner of “Mansfield”—Home of Mr. Watterson]

If you will allow me to say so, in perfect frankness and without

intending to be rude or unkind, the gentlemen immediately about you,

gentlemen upon whom you rely for material aid and energetic party

management, are not, as to the Tariff, Democrats at all; and have

little conception of the place in the popular mind and heart held by

the Revenue Reform idea, or, indeed of any idea, except that of

organization and money.

Of the need of these latter, no man has a more realizing sense, or

larger information and experience, than I have. But they are merely the

brakes and wheels of the engine, to which principles and inspirations

are, and must always be, the elements of life and motion. It is to

entreat you therefore, in your coming letter and address, not to

underestimate the tremendous driving power of this Tariff issue, and to

beg you, not even to seem to qualify it, or to abridge its terms in a

mistaken attempt to seem to be conservative.

You cannot escape your great message of 1887 if you would. I know it by

heart, and I think that I perfectly apprehend its scope and tenor. Take

it as your guiding star. Stand upon it. Reiterate it. Emphasize it,

amplify it, but do not subtract a thought, do not erase a word. For

every vote which a bold front may lose you in the East you will gain

two votes in the West. In the East, particularly in New York, enemies

lurk in your very cupboard, and strike at you from behind your chair at

table. There is more than a fighting chance for Illinois, Iowa, and

Minnesota, and next to a certainty in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana,

if you put yourself personally at the head of the column which is

moving in your name, supposing it to be another name for reduced taxes

and freer exchanges.

Discouraged as I was by the condition of things in New York and Indiana

prior to the Chicago Convention, depressed and almost hopeless by your

nomination, I can see daylight, if you will relax your grip somewhat

upon the East and throw yourself confidently upon the West.

I write warmly because I feel warmly. If you again occupy the White

House, and it is my most constant and earnest prayer that you may, be

sure that you will not be troubled by me. I cannot hope that my motives

in opposing your nomination, consistent as you know them to have been,

or that my conduct during the post-convention discussion and canvass,

free as I know it to have been of ill-feeling, or distemper, has

escaped misrepresentation and misconception. I could not, without the

loss of my self-respect, approach you on any private matter whatever;

though it may not be amiss for me to say to you, that three weeks

before the meeting of the National Convention, I wrote to Mr. Gorman

and Mr. Brice urging the withdrawal of any opposition, and declaring

that I would be a party to no movement to work the two-thirds rule to

defeat the will of the majority.

This is all I have to say, Mr. President, and you can believe it or

not, as you please; though you ought to know that I would write you

nothing except in sincere conviction, nor speak to you, or of you,

except in a candid and kindly spirit. Trusting that this will find you

hale, hearty, and happy, I am, dear sir, your fellow democrat and most

faithful friend,

Marse Henry: An Autobiography, Complete · 第 130 / 184 题