IV

The Jupiter Tonans of reform in attendance upon the convention was Col.

Alexander K. McClure. He was one of the handsomest and most imposing of

men; Halstead himself scarcely more so. McClure was personally unknown

to the Quadrilateral. But this did not stand in the way of our asking

him to dine with us as soon as his claims to fellowship in the good

cause of reform began to make themselves apparent through the need of

bringing the Pennsylvania delegation to a realizing sense.

He looked like a god as he entered the room; nay, he acted like one.

Schurz first took him in hand. With a lofty courtesy I have never seen

equalled he tossed his inquisitor into the air. Halstead came next, and

tried him upon another tack. He fared no better than Schurz. And

hurrying to the rescue of my friends, McClure, looking now a bit bored

and resentful, landed me somewhere near the ceiling.

It would have been laughable if it had not been ignominious. I took my

discomfiture with the bad grace of silence throughout the stiff, formal

and brief meal which was then announced. But when it was over and the

party, risen from table, was about to disperse I collected my energies

and resources for a final stroke. I was not willing to remain so

crushed nor to confess myself so beaten, though I could not disguise

from myself a feeling that all of us had been overmatched.

“McClure,” said I with the cool and quiet resolution of despair,

drawing him aside, “what in the —— do you want anyhow?”

He looked at me with swift intelligence and a sudden show of sympathy,

and then over at the others with a withering glance.

“What? With those cranks? Nothing.”

Jupiter descended to earth. I am afraid we actually took a glass of

wine together. Anyhow, from that moment to the hour of his death we

were the best of friends. Without the inner circle of the

Quadrilateral, which had taken matters into their own hands, were a

number of persons, some of them disinterested and others simple

curiosity and excitement seekers, who might be described as merely

lookers-on in Vienna. The Sunday afternoon before the convention was to

meet we, the self-elect, fell in with a party of these in a garden

“over the Rhine,” as the German quarter of Cincinnati is called. There

was first general and rather aimless talk. Then came a great deal of

speech making. Schurz started it with a few pungent observations

intended to suggest and inspire some common ground of opinion and

sentiment. Nobody was inclined to dispute his leadership, but everybody

was prone to assert his own. It turned out that each regarded himself

and wished to be regarded as a man with a mission, having a clear idea

how things were not to be done. There were Civil Service Reform

Protectionists and Civil Service Reform Free Traders. There were a few

politicians, who were discovered to be spoilsmen, the unforgivable sin,

and quickly dismissed as such.

Coherence was the missing ingredient. Not a man jack of them was

willing to commit or bind himself to anything. Edward Atkinson pulled

one way and William Dorsheimer exactly the opposite way. David A. Wells

sought to get the two together; it was not possible. Sam Bowles shook

his head in diplomatic warning. Horace White threw in a chunk or so of

a rather agitating newspaper independency, and Halstead was in an

inflamed state of jocosity to the more serious-minded.

It was nuts to the Washington Correspondents—story writers and

satirists who were there to make the most out of an occasion in which

the bizarre was much in excess of the conventional—with George Alfred

Townsend and Donn Piatt to set the pace. Hyde had come from St. Louis

to keep especial tab on Grosvenor. Though rival editors facing our way,

they had not been admitted to the Quadrilateral. McCullagh and Nixon

arrived with the earliest from Chicago. The lesser lights of the guild

were innumerable. One might have mistaken it for an annual meeting of

the Associated Press.

V

The convention assembled. It was in Cincinnati’s great Music Hall.

Schurz presided. Who that was there will ever forget his opening words:

“This is moving day.” He was just turned forty-two; in his physiognomy

a scholarly _Herr Doktor_; in his trim lithe figure a graceful athlete;

in the tones of his voice an orator.

Even the bespectacled doctrinaires of the East, whence, since the days

when the Star of Bethlehem shone over the desert, wisdom and wise men

have had their emanation, were moved to something like enthusiasm. The

rest of us were fervid and aglow. Two days and a night and a half the

Quadrilateral had the world in a sling and things its own way. It had

been agreed, as I have said, to limit the field to Adams, Trumbull and

Greeley; Greeley being out of it, as having no chance, still further

abridged it to Adams and Trumbull; and, Trumbull not developing very

strong, Bowles, Halstead and I, even White, began to be sure of Adams

on the first ballot; Adams the indifferent, who had sailed away for

Europe, observing that he was not a candidate for the nomination and

otherwise intimating his disdain of us and it.

Matters thus apparently cocked and primed, the convention adjourned

over the first night of its session with everybody happy except the D.

Davis contingent, which lingered on the scene, but knew its “cake was

dough.” If we had forced a vote that night, as we might have done, we

should have nominated Adams. But inspired by the bravery of youth and

inexperience we let the golden opportunity slip. The throng of

delegates and the audience dispersed.

In those days, it being the business of my life to turn day into night

and night into day, it was not my habit to seek my bed much before the

presses began to thunder below, and this night proving no exception,

and being tempted by a party of Kentuckians, who had come, some to back

me and some to watch me, I did not quit their agreeable society until

the “wee short hours ayont the twal.” Before turning in I glanced at

the early edition of the Commercial, to see that something—I was too

tired to decipher precisely what—had happened. It was, in point of

fact, the arrival about midnight of Gen. Frank P. Blair and Governor B.

Gratz Brown.

I had in my possession documents that would have induced at least one

of them to pause before making himself too conspicuous. The

Quadrilateral, excepting Reid, knew this. We had separated upon the

adjournment of the convention. I being across the river in Covington,

their search was unavailing. I was not to be found. They were in

despair. When having had a few hours of rest I reached the convention

hall toward noon it was too late.

I got into the thick of it in time to see the close, not without an

angry collision with that one of the newly arrived actors whose coming

had changed the course of events, with whom I had lifelong relations of

affectionate intimacy. Sailing but the other day through Mediterranean

waters with Joseph Pulitzer, who, then a mere youth, was yet the

secretary of the convention, he recalled the scene; the unexpected and

not over attractive appearance of the governor of Missouri; his not

very pleasing yet ingenious speech; the stoical, almost lethargic

indifference of Schurz.

“Carl Schurz,” said Pulitzer, “was the most industrious and the least

energetic man I have ever worked with. A word from him at that crisis

would have completely routed Blair and squelched Brown. It was simply

not in him to speak it.”

Greeley was nominated amid a whirl of enthusiasm, his workers, with

Whitelaw Reid at their head, having maintained an admirable and

effective organization and being thoroughly prepared to take advantage

of the opportune moment. It was the logic of the event that B. Gratz

Brown should be placed on the ticket with him.

The Quadrilateral was nowhere. It was done for. The impossible had come

to pass. There rose thereafter a friendly issue of veracity between

Schurz and myself, which illustrates our state of mind. My version is

that we left the convention hall together with an immaterial train of

after incidents, his that we had not met after the adjournment—he quite

sure of this because he had looked for me in vain.

“Schurz was right,” said Joseph Pulitzer upon the occasion of our

yachting cruise just mentioned, “I know, for he and I went directly

from the hall with Judge Stallo to his home on Walnut Hills, where we

dined and passed the afternoon.”

[Illustration: Mrs. Lincoln in 1861.]

The Quadrilateral had been knocked into a cocked hat. Whitelaw Reid was

the only one of us who clearly understood the situation and thoroughly

knew what he was about. He came to me and said: “I have won, and you

people have lost. I shall expect that you stand by the agreement and

meet me as my guests at dinner to-night. But if you do not personally

look after this the others will not be there.”

I was as badly hurt as any, but a bond is a bond and I did as he

desired, succeeding partly by coaxing and partly by insisting, though

it was devious work.

Frostier conviviality I have never sat down to than Reid’s dinner.

Horace White looked more than ever like an iceberg, Sam Bowles was

diplomatic but ineffusive, Schurz was as a death’s head at the board;

Halstead and I through sheer bravado tried to enliven the feast. But

they would none of us, nor it, and we separated early and sadly,

reformers hoist by their own petard.

Marse Henry: An Autobiography, Complete · 第 89 / 184 题