(185.) It is a singular fact, that in the history of this

invention considerable time and great ingenuity were vainly

expended in attempting to overcome a difficulty, which in the end

turned out to be purely imaginary. To comprehend distinctly the

manner in which a wheel carriage is propelled by steam, suppose

that a pin or handle is attached to the spoke of the wheel at some

distance from its centre, and that a force is applied to this pin

in such a manner as to make the wheel revolve. If the tire of the

wheel and the surface of the road were absolutely smooth and free

from friction, so that the face of the tire would slide without

resistance upon the road, then the effect of the force thus

applied would be merely to cause the wheel to turn round, the

carriage being stationary, the surface of the tire slipping or

sliding upon the road as the wheel is made to revolve. But if, on

the other hand, the pressure of the face of the tire upon the road

is such as to produce between them such a degree of adhesion as

will render it impossible for the wheel to slide or slip upon the

road by [Pg336] the force which is applied to it, the consequence

will be, that the wheel can only turn round in obedience to the

force which moves it by causing the carriage to advance, so that

the wheel will roll upon the road, and the carriage will be moved

forward, through a distance equal to the circumference of the

wheel, each time it performs a complete revolution.

It is obvious that both of these effects may be partially produced;

the adhesion of the wheel to the road may be insufficient to prevent

slipping altogether, and yet it may be sufficient to prevent the

wheel from slipping as fast as it revolves. Under such circumstances

the carriage would advance and the wheel would slip. The progressive

motion of the carriage during one complete revolution of the wheel

would be equal to the difference between the complete circumference

of the wheel and the portion through which in one revolution it has

slipped.

When the construction of travelling steam engines first engaged

the attention of engineers, and for a considerable period

afterwards, a notion was impressed upon their minds that the

adhesion between the face of the wheel and the surface of the road

must necessarily be of very small amount, and that in every

practical case the wheels thus driven would either slip

altogether, and produce no advance of the carriage, or that a

considerable portion of the impelling power would be lost by the

partial slipping or sliding of the wheels. It is singular that it

should never have occurred to the many ingenious persons who for

several years were engaged in such experiments and speculations,

to ascertain by experiment the actual amount of adhesion in any

particular case between the wheels and the road. Had they done so,

we should probably now have found locomotive engines in a more

advanced state than that to which they have attained.

To remedy this imaginary difficulty, Messrs. Trevethick and Vivian

proposed to make the external rims of the wheels rough and uneven,

by surrounding them with projecting heads of nails or bolts, or by

cutting transverse grooves on them. They proposed, in cases where

considerable elevations were to be ascended, to cause claws or

nails to project from the surface during the ascent, so as to take

hold of the road. [Pg337]

In seven years after the construction of the first locomotive

engine by these engineers, another locomotive engine was

constructed by Mr. Blinkensop, of Middleton Colliery, near Leeds.

He obtained a patent, in 1811, for the application of a rack-rail.

The railroad thus, instead of being composed of smooth bars of

iron, presented a line of projecting teeth, like those of a

cog-wheel, which stretched along the entire distance to be

travelled. The wheels on which the engine rolled were furnished

with corresponding teeth, which worked in the teeth of the

railroad, and, in this way, produced a progressive motion in the

carriage.

The next contrivance for overcoming this fictitious difficulty,

was that of Messrs. Chapman, who, in the year 1812, obtained a

patent for working a locomotive engine by a chain extending along

the middle of the line of railroad, from the one end to the other.

This chain was passed once round a grooved wheel under the centre

of the carriage; so that, when this grooved wheel was turned by

the engine, the chain being incapable of slipping upon it, the

carriage was consequently advanced on the road. In order to

prevent the strain from acting on the whole length of the chain,

its links were made to fall upon upright forks placed at certain

intervals, which between those intervals sustained the tension of

the chain produced by the engine. Friction-rollers were used to

press the chain into the groove of the wheel, so as to prevent it

from slipping. This contrivance was soon abandoned, for the very

obvious reason that a prodigious loss of force was incurred by the

friction of the chain.

The following year, 1813, produced a contrivance of singular

ingenuity, for overcoming the supposed difficulty arising from the

want of adhesion between the wheels and the road. This was no

other than a pair of mechanical legs and feet, which were made to

walk and propel in a manner somewhat resembling the feet of an

animal.

[Illustration: _Fig._ 86.]

A sketch of these propellers is given in _fig._ 86. A is the

carriage moving on the railroad, L and L′ are the legs, F and F′

the feet. The foot F has a joint at O, which corresponds to the

ankle; another joint is placed at K, which corresponds to the

knee; and a third is placed at L, which corresponds to [Pg338]

the hip. Similar joints are placed at the corresponding letters in

the other leg. The knee-joint K is attached to the end of the

piston of the cylinder. When the piston, which is horizontal, is

pressed outwards, the leg L presses the foot F against the ground,

and the resistance forces the carriage A onwards. As the carriage

proceeds, the angle K at the knee becomes larger, so that the leg

and thigh take a straighter position; and this continues until the

piston has reached the end of its stroke. At the hip L there is a

short lever L M, the extremity of which is connected by a cord or

chain with a point S, placed near the shin of the leg. When the

piston is pressed into the cylinder, the knee K is drawn towards

the engine, and the cord M S is made to lift the foot F from the

ground; to which it does not return until the piston has arrived

at the extremity of the cylinder. On the piston being again driven

out of the cylinder, the foot F, being placed on the road, is

pressed backwards by the force of the piston-rod at K; but the

friction of the ground preventing its backward motion, the

re-action causes the engine to advance: and in the same manner

this process is continued.

Attached to the thigh at N, above the knee, by a joint, is a

horizontal rod N R, which works a rack R. This rack has beneath it

a cog-wheel. This cog-wheel acts in another rack below it. By

these means, when the knee K is driven _from_ the engine, the rack

R is moved _backwards_; but the cog-wheel acting on the other rack

beneath it, will move the latter _in the contrary direction_. The

rack R being then moved _in the_ [Pg339] _same direction with the

knee_ K, it follows that the other rack will always be moved _in a

contrary direction_. The lower rack is connected by another

horizontal rod with the thigh of the leg L F′, immediately above

the knee at N′. When the piston is forced _inwards_, the knee K′

will thus be forced _backwards_; and when the piston is forced

_outwards_, the knee K′ will be drawn _forwards_. It therefore

follows, that the two knees K and K′ are pressed _alternately

backwards_ and _forwards_. The foot F′, when the knee K′ is drawn

forward, is lifted by the means already described for the foot F.

It will be apparent, from this description, that the piece of

mechanism here exhibited is a contrivance derived from the motion

of the legs of an animal, and resembling in all respects the fore

legs of a horse. It is however to be regarded rather as a specimen

of great ingenuity than as a contrivance of practical utility.

(186.) It was about this period that the important fact was first

ascertained that the adhesion or friction of the wheels with the

rails on which they moved was amply sufficient to propel the

engine, even when dragging after it a load of great weight; and

that in such case, the progressive motion would be effected

without any slipping of the wheels. The consequence of this fact

rendered totally useless all the contrivances for giving wheels a

purchase on the road, such as racks, chains, feet, &c. The

experiment by which this was determined appears to have been first

tried on the Wylam railroad; where it was proved, that when the

road was level, and the rails clean, the adhesion of the wheels

was sufficient, in all kinds of weather, to propel considerable

loads. By manual labour it was first ascertained how much weight

the wheels of a common carriage would overcome without slipping

round on the rail, and having found the proportion which that bore

to the weight, they then ascertained that the weight of the engine

would produce sufficient adhesion to drag after it on the railroad

the requisite number of waggons.[31]

In 1814, an engine was constructed at Killingworth, by Mr.

Stephenson, having two cylinders with a cylindrical [Pg340]

boiler, and working two pair of wheels, by cranks placed at right

angles; so that when the one was in full operation, the other was

at its dead points. By these means the propelling power was always

in action. The cranks were maintained in this position by an

endless chain, which passed round two cogged wheels placed under

the engine, and which were fixed on the same axles on which the

wheels were placed. The wheels in this case were fixed on the

axles, and turned with them.

[Illustration: _Fig._ 87.]

This engine is represented in _fig._ 87., the sides being open, to

render the interior mechanism visible. A B is the cylindrical

boiler; C C are the working cylinders; D E are the cogged wheels

fixed on the axle of the wheels of the engine, and surrounded by

the endless chain. These wheels being equal in magnitude, perform

their revolutions in the same time; so that, when the crank F

descends to the lowest point, the crank G rises from the lowest

point to the horizontal position D; and, again, when the crank F

rises from the lowest point to the horizontal position E, the

other crank rises to the highest point; and so on. A very

beautiful contrivance was adopted in this engine, by which it was

suspended on springs of steam. Small cylinders, represented at H,

are screwed by flanges to one side of the boiler, and project

within it a few inches; they have free communication at the top

with the water or steam of the boiler. Solid pistons are

represented at I, which move steam-tight in these [Pg341]

cylinders; the cylinders are open at the bottom, and the

piston-rods are screwed on the carriage of the engine, over the

axle of each pair of wheels, the pistons being presented upwards.

As the engine is represented in the figure, it is supported on

four pistons, two at each side. The pistons are pressed upon by

the water or steam which occupies the upper chamber of the

cylinder; and the latter being elastic in a high degree, the

engine has all the advantage of spring suspension. The defect of

this method of supporting the engine is, that when the steam loses

that amount of elasticity necessary for the support of the

machine, the pistons are forced into the cylinders, and the

bottoms of the cylinders bear upon them. All spring suspension is

then lost. This mode of suspension has consequently since been

laid aside.

In an engine subsequently constructed by Mr. Stephenson, for the

Killingworth railroad, the mode adopted of connecting the wheels

by an endless chain and cog-wheels was abandoned; and the same

effect was produced by connecting the two cranks by a straight

rod. All such contrivances, however, have this great defect, that,

if the fore and hind wheels be not constructed with dimensions

accurately equal, there must necessarily be a slipping or dragging

on the road. The nature of the machinery requires that each wheel

should perform its revolution exactly in the same time; and

consequently, in doing so, must pass over exactly equal lengths of

the road. If, therefore, the circumference of the wheels be not

accurately equal, that wheel which has the lesser circumference

must be dragged along so much of the road as that by which it

falls short of the circumference of the greater wheel; or, on the

other hand, the greater wheel must be dragged in the opposite

direction, to compensate for the same difference. As no mechanism

can accomplish a perfect equality in four, much less in six,

wheels, it may be assumed that a great portion of that dragging

effect is a necessary consequence of the principle of this

machine; and even were the wheels, in the first instance,

accurately constructed, it is not possible that their wear could

be so exactly uniform as to continue equal.

(187.) The next stimulus which the progress of this [Pg342]

invention received, proceeded from the great national work

undertaken at Liverpool, by which that town and the extensive

commercial mart of Manchester were connected by a double line of

railway. When this project was undertaken, it was not decided what

moving power it might be most expedient to adopt as a means of

transport on the proposed road: the choice lay between horse

power, fixed steam engines, and locomotive engines; but the first,

for many obvious reasons, was at once rejected in favour of one or

other of the last two.

The steam engine may be applied, by two distinct methods, to move

waggons either on a turnpike road or on a railway. By the one

method the steam engine is fixed, and draws the carriage or train

of carriages towards it by a chain extending the whole length of

road on which the engine works. By this method the line of road

over which the transport is conducted is divided into a number of

short intervals, at the extremity of each of which an engine is

placed. The waggons or carriages, when drawn by any engine to its

own station, are detached, and connected with the extremity of the

chain worked by the next stationary engine; and thus the journey

is performed, from station to station, by separate engines. By the

other method the same engine draws the load the whole journey,

travelling with it.

The Directors of the Liverpool and Manchester railroad, when that

work was advanced towards its completion, employed, in the spring

of the year 1829, Messrs. Stephenson and Lock, and Messrs. Walker

and Rastrick, experienced engineers, to visit the different

railways, where practical information respecting the comparative

effects of stationary and locomotive engines was likely to be

obtained; and from these gentlemen they received reports on the

relative merits, according to their judgment of the two methods.

The particulars of their calculations are given at large in the

valuable work of Mr. Nicholas Wood on railways; to which we refer

the reader, not only on this, but on many other subjects connected

with the locomotive steam engine, into which it would be foreign

to our object to enter. The result of the comparison of the two

systems was, that the capital [Pg343] necessary to be advanced to

establish a line of stationary engines was considerably greater

than that which was necessary to establish an equivalent power in

locomotive engines; that the annual expense by the stationary

engines was likewise greater; and that, consequently, the expense

of transport by the latter was greater, in a like proportion. The

subjoined table exhibits the results numerically:—

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

| | | Expense of

| | | taking a

| | Annual | Ton of Goods

| Capital. | Expense. | a Mile.

——————————————————-+——————————————-+——————————————-+—————————————

| £ s. d.| £ s. d.|

Locomotive engines | 58,000 0 0 | 25,517 8 2 | 0·164 penny

Stationary engines | 121,496 7 0 | 42,031 16 5 | 0·269

|——————————————-+——————————————-+—————————————

Locomotive system | | |

less | 63,496 7 0 | 16,514 8 3 | 0·105

——————————————————-+——————————————-+——————————————-+—————————————

On the score of economy, therefore, the system of locomotive

engines was entitled to a preference; but there were other

considerations which conspired with this to decide the choice of

the Directors in its favour. An accident occurring in any part of

a road worked by stationary engines must necessarily produce a

total suspension of work along the entire line. The most vigilant

and active attention on the part of every workman, however

employed, in every part of the line, would therefore be necessary;

but, independently of this, accidents arising from the fracture or

derangement of any of the chains, or from the suspension of the

working of any of the fixed engines, would be equally injurious,

and would effectually stop the intercourse along the line. On the

other hand, in locomotive engines an accident could only affect

the particular train of carriages drawn by the engine to which the

accident might occur; and even then the difficulty could be

remedied by having a supply of spare engines at convenient

stations along the line. It is true that the _probability_ of

accident is, perhaps, less in the stationary than in the

locomotive system; but the _injurious consequences_, when accident

_does_ happen, are prodigiously greater in the former. "The one

system," says Mr. Walker, "is like a chain extending from

Liverpool to Manchester, the failure [Pg344] of a single link of

which would destroy the whole; while the other is like a number of

short and unconnected chains," the destruction of any one of which

does not interfere with the effect of the others, and the loss of

which may be supplied with facility.

The decision of the Directors was, therefore, in favour of

locomotive engines; and their next measure was to devise some

means by which the inventive genius of the country might be

stimulated to supply them with the best possible form of engines

for this purpose. With this view, it was proposed and carried into

effect to offer a prize for the best locomotive engine which might

be produced under certain proposed conditions, and to appoint a

time for a public trial of the claims of the candidates. A premium

of five hundred pounds was accordingly offered for the best

locomotive engine to run on the Liverpool and Manchester railway;

under the condition that it should produce no smoke; that the

pressure of the steam should be limited to fifty pounds on the

inch; and that it should draw at least three times its own weight,

at the rate of not less than ten miles an hour; that the engine

should be supported on springs, and should not exceed fifteen feet

in height. Precautions were also proposed against the consequences

of the boiler bursting; and other matters not necessary to mention

more particularly here. This proposal was announced in the spring

of 1829, and the time of trial was appointed in the following

October. The engines which underwent the trial were, the Rocket,

constructed by Mr. Stephenson; the Sanspareil, by Hackworth; and

the Novelty, by Messrs. Braithwaite and Ericson. Of these, the

Rocket obtained the premium. A line of railway was selected for

the trial, on a level piece of road about two miles in length,

near a place called Rainhill, between Liverpool and Manchester;

the distance between the two stations was a mile and a half, and

the engine had to travel this distance backwards and forwards ten

times, which made altogether a journey of thirty miles. The Rocket

performed this journey twice: the first time in 2 hours 14 minutes

and 8 seconds; and the second time in 2 hours 6 minutes and 49

seconds. Its speed at different parts of the journey varied: its

greatest rate of motion was [Pg345] rather above 29 miles an

hour; and its least, about 11-1/2 miles an hour. The average rate

of the one journey was 13-4/10 miles an hour; and of the other,

14-2/20 miles. This was the only engine which performed the

complete journey proposed, the others having been stopped from

accidents which occurred to them in the experiment. The Sanspareil

performed the distance between the stations eight times,

travelling 22-1/2 miles in 1 hour 37 minutes and 16 seconds. The

greatest velocity to which this engine attained was something less

than 23 miles per hour. The Novelty had only passed twice between

the stations when the joints of the boiler gave way, and put an

end to the experiment.

(188.) The great object to be attained in the construction of

these engines was, to combine with sufficient lightness the

greatest possible heating power. The fire necessarily acts on the

water in two ways: first, by its radiant heat; and second, by the

current of heated air which is carried by the draught through the

flues, and finally passes into the chimney. To accomplish this

object, therefore, it is necessary to expose to both these sources

of heat the greatest possible quantity of surface in contact with

the water. These ends were attained by the following admirable

arrangement in the Rocket:—

[Illustration: _Fig._ 88.]

[Illustration: _Fig._ 89.]

This engine is represented in _fig._ 88. It is supported on four

wheels; the principal part of the weight being thrown on one pair,

which are worked by the engine. The boiler consists of a cylinder

six feet in length, with flat ends; the chimney issues from one

end, and to the other end is attached a square box B, the bottom

of which is furnished with the grate on which the fuel is placed.

This box is composed of two casings of iron, one contained within

the other, having between them a space about three inches in

breadth; the magnitude of the box being three feet in length, two

feet in width, and three feet in depth. The casing which surrounds

the box communicates with the lower part of the boiler by a pipe

marked C; and the same casing at the top of the box communicates

with the upper part of the boiler by another pipe marked D. When

water is admitted into the boiler, therefore, it flows freely,

through the pipe C, into the casing which [Pg346] surrounds the

furnace or fire-box, and fills this casing to the same level as

that which it has in the boiler. When the engine is at work, the

boiler is kept about half filled with water; and, consequently,

the casing surrounding the furnace is completely filled. The steam

which is generated in the water contained in the casing finds its

exit through the pipe D, and escapes into the upper part of the

boiler. A section of the engine, taken at right angles to its

length, is represented at _fig._ 89. Through the lower part of the

boiler pass a number of copper tubes of small size, which

communicate at one end with the fire-box, and at the other with

the chimney, and form a passage for the heated air from the

furnace to the chimney. The ignited fuel spread on the grate at

the bottom of the fire-box disperses its heat by radiation, and

acts in this manner on the whole surface of the casing surrounding

the fire-box; and thus raises the temperature of the thin shell of

water contained in that casing. The chief [Pg347] part of the

water in the casing, being lower in its position than the water in

the boiler, acquires a tendency to ascend when heated, and passes

into the boiler; so that a constant circulation of the heated

water is maintained, and the water in the boiler must necessarily

be kept at nearly the same temperature as the water in the casing.

The air which passes through the burning fuel, and which fills the

fire-box, is carried by the draught through the tubes which extend

through the lower part of the boiler; and as these tubes are

surrounded on every side with the water contained in the boiler,

this air transmits its heat through these tubes to the water. It

finally issues into the chimney, and rises by the draught. The

power of this furnace must necessarily depend on the power of

draught in the chimney; and to increase this, and at the same time

to dispose of the waste steam after it has worked the piston, this

steam is carried off by a pipe L, which passes from the cylinder

to the chimney, and escapes there in a jet which is turned

upwards. By the velocity with which it issues from this jet, and

by its great comparative levity, it produces a strong current

upwards in the chimney, and thus gives force to the draught of the

furnace. In _fig._ 89. the grate-bars are represented at the

bottom of the fire-box at F. There are two cylinders, one of which

works each wheel; one only appearing in the drawing _fig._ 88.,

the other being concealed by the engine. The spokes which these

cylinders work are placed at right angles on the wheels; the

wheels being fixed on a common axle, with which they turn.

In this engine, the surface of water surrounding the fire-box,

exposed to the action of radiant heat, amounted to twenty square

feet, which received heat from the surface of six square feet of

burning fuel on the bars. The surface exposed to the action of the

heated air amounted to 118 square feet. The engine drew after it

another carriage, containing fuel and water; the fuel used was

coke, for the purpose of avoiding the production of smoke.

The Steam Engine Explained and Illustrated (Seventh Edition) With an Account of Its Invention and Progressive Improvement, and Its Application to Navigation and Railways; Including Also a Memoir of Watt · 第 29 / 44 段