DANIEL.

There is scarcely a step from the school to the forum--from the nursery

to the world. Young girls, who in England would be all blushes and bread

and butter, boldly precede their mammas into the ball-room; and the code

of a mistaken gallantry supplies no corrective to their caprice, for

youth and beauty are here invested with regal prerogatives, and can do

no wrong. In short, the Americans carry their complaisance to the sex

beyond due bounds--at least in little things--for we by no means think

that the real influence of their women is great, notwithstanding the

tame and submissive gallantry with which the latter are treated in

public. We doubt whether the most limited gynocracy would tolerate the

use of tobacco as an article of daily diet, or permit ferocious murders

to go unwhipped of justice under the name of duels. But the absorbing

character of the pursuits of the men forbids any strong sympathy betwixt

the sexes; and perhaps the despotism which the women exercise in the

drawing-room arises from the fact that all that relates to the graces

and embellishments of life is left entirely to them. We do not know

that this can be avoided under the circumstances of the country, but it

has a most injurious effect upon social intercourse. The Americans of

both sexes want tact and graciousness of manner, and that prompt and

spontaneous courtesy which is the child of discipline and

self-restraint. They are seldom absolutely awkward, because they are

never bashful; they have no _mauvaise honte_, because they are all on an

equality; hence they never fail to display a certain dry composure of

bearing, which, though not agreeable, is less ludicrous than the

_gaucherie_ so commonly observed in all classes of English society,

except the very highest.

It is curious to observe how the manners of two nations of the same

origin, and, in a great degree, of similar instincts, are modified by

their political institutions. Neither the British nor the Americans are

distinguished for that natural politeness and _savoir vivre_, which is

to be found more or less in all other civilised countries. They are both

too grave, too busy, and too ambitious to lay themselves out for

trifles, which, after all, go far to make up the sum of human happiness.

As for the Americans, the general aspect of their society is dreary and

monotonous in the extreme. Whatever "our first circles" may say to the

contrary, there is a great equality of manners, as of other things,

amongst them; but if the standard is nowhere very high, it never falls

so low as with us; if there is less refinement and cultivation amongst

the higher classes, (we beg Demus' pardon for the expression,) there is

on the other hand less grossness, certainly less clownishness, among the

mass. Of course there are many individuals in this, as in other

countries, remarkable for natural grace and genteel bearing; but the

class which is pre-eminent in these respects, is very small and

ill-defined. The great national defect is a want of sprightliness and

vivacity, and an impartial _insouciance_ in their intercourse with all

classes and conditions of men. For if inequality has its evils, it has

also its charms; as the prospect of swelling mountains and lowly vales

is more pleasing to the eye than that of the monotonous, though more

fertile champaign. Now, as the relation of patrician and plebeian, of

patron and client, of master and servant, of superior and inferior, can

scarcely be said to exist in the United States, so all the nice

gradations of manner which are elicited by those relations, are wanting

also. The social machine rubs on with as little oil as possible--there

is but small room for the exercise of the amenities and charities of

life. The favours of the great are seldom rewarded by the obsequiousness

of the small. No leisure and privileged class exists to set an example

of refined and courtly bearing; but there are none, however humble, who

may not affect the manners of their betters without impertinence, and

aspire to the average standard of the Republic. Hence, almost every

native American citizen is capable of conducting himself with propriety,

if not with ease, in general society. What are fine ladies and gentlemen

to him, that he should stand in awe of them? Simply persons who have

been smarter or earlier in the field of fortune than himself, who will

"burst up" some fine morning, and leave the road open to others. The

principle of rotation[6] is not confined to the political world of the

United States, but obtains in every department of life. It is throughout

the same song--

"Here we go up, up, up,

And here we go down, down, down."

Law and opinion, and the circumstances of the country, are alike

opposed to the accumulation of property, so that it is rare for two

successive generations of the same family to occupy the same social

position. The ease with which fortunes are made, or repaired, is only

equalled by the recklessness with which they are lost. Prosperity, at

some time or other, appears to be the birth-right of every citizen; and,

where all are _parvenus_ alike, there are none to assume the airs of

exclusiveness, or to crush the last comer beneath the weight of

traditional and time-honoured grandeur.

It is not easy to dismiss the peculiarities of our British society in a

paragraph. Bull, however, to be appreciated, must be seen in the midst

of his own household gods, with his family and bosom friends about him.

This is what may be called the normal state of that fine fellow--and

here Jonathan can't hold a candle to him. American interiors want relief

and variety of colouring. Their children are not like the children of

the Old World: they don't romp, or prattle, or get into mischief, or

believe in Bogie. They seem to take brevet rank, from the first, as men

and women, and are quite inaccessible to nursery humbug of any kind.

They are never whipped, and eat as much pastry as they think proper;

whereby they grow up dyspeptic and rational beyond their years. Parents

don't appear to exercise any particular functions, masters (we again beg

Demus's pardon for the poverty of the vernacular) have nothing

magisterial about them, and servants won't stomach even the name, at

least if they wear white skins, and know it. After the first burst of

admiration at the philosophy of the thing, it grows tiresome to live

amongst people who are all so much alike. Now in England the

distinctions of age, and rank, and sex, are much more strongly marked;

while in those countries of Europe which are still less under the

influence of the equalising spirit of the age, the social landscape is

still more variegated and picturesque. With us, two adverse principles

are at work; and this is the reason why our British society is so

anomalous to ourselves, and so entirely beyond the comprehension of

foreigners. Whenever our brave Bull is thrown into a mixed company

abroad, or even at home, where the social position of those with whom he

is brought into contact is unknown to him, there is no end to the

blundering and nonsense of the worthy fellow. Go where he will, he is

haunted by the traditions of his eccentric island, and desperately

afraid of placing himself in what he calls a false position. At home, he

has one manner for his nobleman, another for his tradesman, another for

his valet; and he would rather die than fail in the orthodox intonation

appropriate to each. Who has not observed the strange mixture of

petulance and _mauvaise honte_ which distinguishes so many of our

English travellers on the Continent? Decidedly, we appear to less

advantage in public than any people in the world. Place a Briton and an

American, of average parts and breeding, on board a Rhine steam-boat,

and it is almost certain that the Yankee will mix up, so to speak, the

better of the two. The gregarious habits of our continental neighbours

are more familiar to him than to his insular kinsman, and he is not

tormented like the latter by the perpetual fear of failing, either in

what is due to himself or to others. His manners will probably want

polish and dignity; he will be easy rather than graceful, communicative

rather than affable; but he will at least preserve his Republican

composure, alike in his intercourse with common humanity, or in the

atmosphere of more courtly and exclusive circles.

The art of pleasing is nowhere well understood in the United States: but

the beauty of the women, though transient, is unrivalled while it lasts,

and perhaps in no country is the standard of female virtue so high. The

formal and exaggerated attention which the sex receives from all classes

in public, is at least a proof of the high estimation in which it is

held, and must, we think, be put down as an amiable trait in the

American character.

We are quite sure, for instance, that females may travel unattended in

the United States with far more ease and security than in any country of

the Old World: and the deference paid to them is quite irrespective of

the rank of the fair objects--it is a tribute paid to the _woman_ and

not to the _lady_. Some travellers we believe have denied this. We can

only say, that during a pretty extensive tour we do not recollect a

single instance in which even the unreasonable wishes of women were not

complied with as of course. We _did_ remark with less satisfaction the

ungracious manner in which civilities were received by these spoilt

children of the Republic--the absence of apologetic phrases, and those

courtesies of voice and expression, with which women usually acknowledge

the deference paid to their weakness and their charms. But this is a

national failing. The Americans are too independent to confess a sense

of obligation, even in the little conventional matters of daily

intercourse. They have almost banished from the language such phrases

as, "Thank you," "If you please," "I beg your pardon," and the like. The

French, who are not half so attentive to women as the Americans, pass

for the politest nation in Europe, because they know how to veil their

selfishness beneath a profusion of bows and pretty speeches. Now, when

your Yankee is invited to surrender his snug seat in a stage or a

railroad carriage in favour of a fair voyager, he does not hesitate for

a moment. He expectorates, and retires at once. But no civilities are

interchanged; no smiles or bows pass betwixt the parties. The gentleman

expresses no satisfaction--the lady murmurs no apologies.

Even now we see in our mind's eye the pert, pretty little faces, and the

loves of bonnets which flirt and flutter along Broadway in the bright

sunshine--_Longum Vale_! In the flesh we shall see them no more. No more

oysters at Downing's, no more terrapins at Florence's, no more fugacious

banquets at the Astor House. We have traduced the State, and for us

there is no return. The commercial house which we represent, has offered

to renew its confidence, but it has failed to restore ours. No amount of

commission whatever, will tempt us to affront the awful majesty of

Lynch, or to expose ourselves to the tar-and-feathery tortures which he

prepares for those who blaspheme the Republic. We have ordered our buggy

for the Home Circuit, and propose, by a course of deliberate

mastication, and unlimited freedom of speech, to repair the damage which

our digestion, and we fear our temper, has sustained during our travels

in "the area of freedom."

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 61, No. 378, April, 1847 · 第 30 / 52 题