How shameful and yet it was most real. Bakewell narrates that

"I went several times to the Baptist meeting in Second Street,

under the care of Dr. Rogers. This man burst out, and bade the

people beware, for 'a Priestley had entered the land;' and then,

crouching down in a worshiping attitude, exclaimed, 'Oh, Lamb of

God! how would they pluck thee from thy throne!'"

The public prints flayed Rogers, and even the staid old Philosophical

Society indicated to him that such conduct ill became a member of that

august body. Accordingly humiliated he repented his error and in time

became strongly attached to Priestley, concerning whom he told this

story to a Mr. Taylor whose language is here given:

The Doctor (Priestley) would occasionally call on Dr. Rogers, and

without any formal invitation, pass an evening at his house. One

afternoon he was there when Dr. Rogers was not at home, having

been assured by Mrs. Rogers that her husband would soon be there.

Meanwhile, Mr. ----, a Baptist minister, called on Dr. Rogers, and

being a person of rough manners, Mrs. Rogers was a good deal

concerned lest he should say something disrespectful to Dr.

Priestley in case she introduced the Doctor to him. At last,

however, she ventured to announce Dr. Priestley's name, who put

out his hand; but instead of taking it the other immediately drew

himself back, saying, as if astonished to meet with Dr. Priestley

in the home of one of his brethren, and afraid of being

contaminated by having any social intercourse with him, 'Dr.

Priestley! I can't be cordial.'

It is easy to imagine that by this speech Mrs. Rogers was greatly

embarrassed. Dr. Priestley, observing this, instantly relieved her

by saying, and with all that benevolent expression of countenance

and pleasantness of manner for which he was remarkable, 'Well,

well, Madam, you and I can be cordial; and Dr. Rogers will soon be

with us, Mr. ---- and he can converse together, so that we shall

all be very comfortable.' Thus encouraged, Mrs. Rogers asked Dr.

Priestley some questions relative to the Scripture prophecies, to

which he made suitable replies; and before Dr. Rogers arrived,

Mr. ---- was listening with much attention, sometimes making a

remark or putting in a question. The evening was passed in the

greatest harmony, with no inclination on the part of Mr. ---- to

terminate the conversation. At last Dr. Priestley, pulling out his

watch, informed Mr. ---- that as it was _ten_ o'clock it was time

that two old men like them were at their quarters. The other at

first was not willing to believe that Dr. Priestley's watch was

accurate; but finding that it was correct, he took his leave with

apparent regret, observing that he had never spent a shorter and

more pleasant evening. He then went away, Dr. Priestley

accompanying him, until it became necesary to separate. Next

morning he called on his friend, Dr. Rogers, when he made the

following frank and manly declaration: 'You and I well know that

Dr. Priestley is quite wrong in regard to his theology, but

notwithstanding this, he is a great and good man, and I behaved to

him at our first coming together like a fool and a brute.'

Many additional evidences might be introduced showing that the Doctor

was slowly winning his way among the people. It must also be remembered

that not all of his associates were of the clerical group but that he

had hosts of scientists as sincere and warm supporters. In Woodhouse's

laboratory he was ever welcome and there must have met many congenial

spirits who never discussed politics or religion. This was after the

manner of the Lunar Society in Birmingham in which representatives of

almost every creed came together to think of scientific matters. Hence,

it is quite probable that Priestley's visit to Philadelphia was on the

whole full of pleasure.

He was also in habits of close intimacy with Dr. Ewing, Provost of the

University of Pennsylvania, and with the Vice-Provost, Dr. John

Andrews, as well as with Dr. Benjamin Rush who had long been his friend

and with whom he corresponded at frequent intervals after his arrival in

America. To him Priestley had confided his hope of getting a college in

Northumberland and inquired,--

Would the State give any encouragement to it?

Priestley in America, 1794-1804 · 第 19 / 55 题